Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, June 1998, p. 1534-1538, Vol. 36, No. 6
0095-1137/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Detection of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) RNA in
Pools of Sera Negative for Antibodies to HIV-1 and HIV-2
Pierre-Alain
Morandi,1
Gérard A.
Schockmel,1
Sabine
Yerly,1
Philippe
Burgisser,2
Peter
Erb,3
Lukas
Matter,4
Radan
Sitavanc,5 and
Luc
Perrin1,*
Laboratory of Virology and AIDS Center,
Division of Infectious Diseases, Geneva University Hospital, 1211 Geneva,1
Division of Immunology and
Allergy, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, 1011 Lausanne,2
Institute for Medical
Microbiology, University of Basel, 4003 Basel,3
Institute for Medical Microbiology, University of Bern,
3010 Bern,4 and
Bio Analytique
Institute, 1207 Geneva,5 Switzerland
Received 22 December 1997/Returned for modification 25 February
1998/Accepted 17 March 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
A total of 234 pools were prepared from 10,692 consecutive serum
samples negative for antibodies to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and HIV-2 collected at five virological laboratories (average
pool size, 45 serum samples). Pools were screened for the presence of
HIV-1 RNA by a modified commercial assay (Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor test)
which included an additional polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation
step prior to purification of viral RNA (PEG Amplicor assay). The
sensitivity of this assay for HIV-1 RNA detection in individual serum
samples within pools matches that of standard commercial assays for
individual serum samples, i.e., 500 HIV-1 RNA copies per ml. Five pools
were identified as positive, and each one contained one
antibody-negative, HIV-1 RNA-positive serum sample, corresponding to an
average of 1 infected sample per 2,138 serum samples. Retrospective
analysis revealed that the five HIV-1 RNA-positive specimens originated
from individuals who had symptomatic primary HIV-1 infection at the
time of sample collection and who were also positive for p24
antigenemia. We next assessed the possibility of performing the
prepurification step by high-speed centrifugation (50,000 × g for 80 min) of 1.5-ml pools containing 25 µl of 60 individual serum samples, of which only 1 contained HIV-1 RNA
(centrifugation Amplicor assay). The sensitivity of this assay also
matches the sensitivities of standard commercial assays for HIV-1 RNA
detection in individual serum samples. The results demonstrate that
both assays with pooled sera can be applied to the screening of large
numbers of serum samples in a time- and cost-efficient manner.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Diagnosis of human immunodeficiency
virus (HIV) infection is commonly based on the detection of antibodies
to HIV, but seroconversion, i.e., the appearance of specific anti-HIV
antibodies, usually occurs 3 to 8 weeks after the infectious
contact and 5 to 10 days after the onset of symptoms associated with
early infection (4, 9, 12, 19). The window period between
infection and seropositivity can be shortened by testing plasma or sera
for the presence of HIV p24 antigen (4, 6, 9) and/or HIV
type 1 (HIV-1) RNA (4, 8, 13). The presence of HIV-1 RNA in
plasma is a more sensitive marker than the presence of p24
antigen in plasma (4, 8), and several commercial kits are
now available for the detection of HIV-1 RNA, including
quantitative PCR (Amplicor), nucleic acid sequence-based
amplification, and branched DNA signal amplification (Quantiplex)
(21). However, although these techniques are routinely used
for the determination of viremia in HIV-1-infected individuals, they
cannot be used for systematic screening for HIV-1 infection due to
their high costs and labor-intensive nature. Assays for HIV-1 RNA with
pooled sera instead of individual sera, as performed previously
for HIV-1 antibody testing (15, 25), would be less expensive
and time-consuming but would carry the risk of reduced analytical
sensitivity. We recently developed a boosted version of the Amplicor
assay with a lower detection limit of 20 HIV-1 RNA copies per ml
(23). The increase in sensitivity was achieved by
introducing a high-speed centrifugation step prior to purification of
viral RNA. In this assay, standard high-speed centrifuges restrict the
input volume of samples to 1.5 ml.
For the present investigation, which was aimed at detecting
antibody-negative HIV-1 RNA-positive samples among sera sent to microbiological laboratories, we developed two modified formats of the
Amplicor assay for the analysis of pooled sera. The first was designed
to allow low-speed centrifugation of large serum pools by using a
polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation step prior to viral
purification. The second was based on high-speed centrifugation of
smaller input volumes.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Collection of specimens.
Between November 1996 and March
1997 a total of 10,692 individual serum samples were collected at
five centers including four university hospital laboratories (Basel,
Bern, Lausanne, and Geneva, Switzerland) and one private laboratory
(Bio-Analytique Institute [BAI], Geneva). The commercial kits used
for the detection of anti-HIV antibodies were the following: HIV1/2
AxSYM, (Abbott, Delkenheim, Germany) (Basel, Bern, BAI, and Geneva),
VIDAS (BioMérieux, Marcy-l'Etoile, France) (Basel and Bern),
GENSCREEN HIV1/2 (Sanofi Pasteur, Marnes la Coquette, France) (Basel,
Lausanne, and Geneva), Cobas core anti-HIV1/HIV2 EIA DAGS (Roche,
Basel, Switzerland) (Lausanne), and MUREX HIV1/2 ICE 1.0.2 (MUREX,
Dartford, England) (BAI). All of the centers except BAI used two
different screening tests for each serum sample; BAI used only one,
either the MUREX assay or the Abbott assay. Pools were prepared daily
by mixing a maximum of 70 individual HIV-1 antibody-negative serum
samples (200 µl of each sample), stored at
75°C, and sent on dry
ice once a week to the Geneva Laboratory of Virology. Lists of the samples included in the pools were recorded on the daily protocol used
to perform antibody screening. Individual serum samples were stored at
20°C according to the standard procedure in use in each of the
participating laboratories and were available for further analysis on
request. Assays for HIV-1 p24 antigen in individual serum samples were
performed retrospectively with a commercial kit (HIVAG-1 monoclonal;
Abbott).
Four serum samples from HIV-1 seroconverters collected at the Geneva
Laboratory were used to compare the Amplicor assay with the
centrifugation Amplicor assay.
HIV-1 RNA assays. (i) PEG Amplicor assay.
The PEG Amplicor
assay is based on modifications of the Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor test
(Roche) (17, 23) including (i) a PEG precipitation step
prior to the extraction of viral RNA in order to accommodate larger
input volumes and allow initial centrifugation at low speed (1,500 × g); (ii) an increase in the PCR amplification step from
30 to 40 cycles in order to achieve a higher sensitivity (qualitative
assay); and (iii) a modification of reagent volumes in order to reach a
final concentration of the internal quantitation standard (IQS)
identical to that used in the standard Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor and to
increase the concentration of RNA introduced in the PCR. Briefly, the
pools of sera from the same participating center prepared daily were
thawed, the tubes were centrifuged at 1,500 × g for 10 min to remove fibrin deposits, and half of the pooled volume
(corresponding to 100 µl of each serum sample) was used for the
detection of HIV-1 RNA. When the pools contained less than 20 serum
samples they were mixed with other pools from the same center to yield
an input volume of 3 to 7 ml. A 50% commercial PEG solution
(Polyethylene glycol 6'000 Solution; Fluka Chemie AG, Buchs,
Switzerland) and a 3 M NaCl solution (final concentration of PEG, 3%;
final concentration of NaCl, 0.15 M) were added, and the tubes (15-ml
Falcon tube; Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, N.J.) were placed on ice
for 30 min and spun at 1,500 × g for 30 min at 4°C.
The resulting pellet, corresponding to about 100 µl, was mixed with
1,650 µl of Working Lysis Reagent (containing the IQS) and kept at
room temperature for 10 min, and then 1,750 µl of isopropanol was
added. The tubes were centrifuged at 1,500 × g for 15 min at room temperature, and the pellet was washed with 1 ml of 70%
ethanol and then transferred to a 1.5-ml tube and spun at 12,500 × g for 5 min with a microcentrifuge. The ethanol was then
removed completely, and the pellet was resuspended in 100 µl of
Specimen Diluent. For the PCR, 50 µl of the processed specimen was
mixed with 50 µl Master Mix and was amplified according to the
manufacturer's instructions with a Perkin-Elmer 9600 thermal cycler
(Roche, Branchburg, N.J.) with 36 cycles of 10 s at 95°C, 10 s at 60°C, and 10 s at 72°C instead of 26 cycles (40 total cycles instead of 30 total cycles). The detection of amplified sequences was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions, except that amplified samples were diluted only 1/1, 1/5, and 1/25 for
the detection of HIV-1 RNA and 1/5 for the detection of the IQS. This
allowed the inclusion of two samples per slot and thus a reduction in
the cost. Pools were considered positive when the optical density for
HIV-1 was >0.2 and when the OD for the IQS was >0.3. When HIV-1 RNA
was detected, the pools of sera prepared daily were analyzed
separately, and positive pools were split for further analysis (they
were first split into pools of 10 serum samples, and then the
individual serum samples were tested).
(ii) Centrifugation Amplicor assay.
The centrifugation
Amplicor assay is based on modifications of the Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor
test and was performed with pools of 1.5 ml containing 59 HIV-negative
serum samples and either 25 µl of an individual serum sample with a
known HIV-1 RNA copy number or 25 µl of one serum sample from a
seroconverting patient. Pools were centrifuged at 27,000 rpm
(50,000 × g) for 80 min at 4°C with a Biofuge 28 RS
centrifuge with a 3740 rotor with 12 positions (Heraeus AG, Osterode,
Germany). The pellet was resuspended in 518 µl of Lysis Reagent and
82 µl of Working Lysis Reagent, and the mixture was then incubated
for 10 min at room temperature. HIV-1 RNA was precipitated with 620 µl of isopropanol, spun at 12,500 × g for 15 min,
washed with 1 ml of 70% ethanol, and spun again at 12,500 × g for 5 min. The ethanol was removed completely with a
disposable transfer pipette, and the tubes were left open for 15 min
under a closed box to remove traces of ethanol. The box was then
treated with UV light overnight. The pellet was suspended in 55 µl of
Specimen Diluent, and the processed specimen was treated as recommended
by the manufacturer. Pools were considered positive when the OD for
HIV-1 was >0.2 and when the OD for the IQS was >0.3.
(iii) Amplicor assay.
The standard Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor
test (Roche) was performed with individual serum samples according to
the manufacturer's instructions.
 |
RESULTS |
PEG Amplicor assay.
We first determined the optimal
concentrations of PEG and NaCl required to achieve maximal recovery and
ease of resuspension of the pellet and found that the addition of final
concentrations of 3% PEG and 0.15 M NaCl was a good compromise (data
not shown). A major goal was to achieve a degree of analytical
sensitivity for individual samples within pools similar to that
achieved by the Amplicor assay for individual samples tested
separately. Table 1 reports the results
for three series of pools of 6 ml each tested in quintuplicate and
containing serum with known numbers of copies of HIV-1 RNA from
the same infected individual. HIV-1 RNA was detected down to an
input of 50 copies per pool, corresponding to a detection limit of 5 to
10 copies/ml. Because the pools contained only 0.1 ml of each serum
sample, the detection limit for an individual serum sample within a
pool was 500 copies/ml. A similar sensitivity was achieved when the
same experiment was repeated twice with pools mixed with HIV-1 RNA
containing sera from two other infected individuals (data not shown).
Screening of HIV-1/2 antibody-negative sera.
A total of 234 pools containing 10,692 individual serum samples negative for
antibodies to HIV-1 and HIV-2 (HIV-1/2 antibody-negative sera) were
analyzed for the presence of HIV-1 RNA by the PEG Amplicor assay.
Details concerning the number and size of the serum pools are reported
in Table 2.
No inhibition of PCR amplification (OD for IQS, >1.0 at a dilution of
1/5) was detected for the 176 pools of sera collected at the four
university hospital laboratories. Nine of 58 pools received from the
private laboratory (BAI) had evidence of inhibition, as indicated by
ODs for the IQS ranging from 0.108 to 0.253 at a dilution of 1/5.
Further investigations revealed a protocol violation due to the
inclusion of heparinized samples in the nine pools (heparin is known to
inhibit PCR reactions [11]). These pools were among
the first 20 collected at this laboratory. No inhibitory activity was
detected in the next 38 pools provided by the same private laboratory.
These pools contained only sera prepared according to the protocol.
Five pools were positive for HIV-1 RNA, all with an OD for HIV-1 of
>1.0 at a dilution of 1/5 (Table 3).
Initially, two additional pools had been positive for HIV-1 RNA, but
further analysis revealed that they contained each an HIV-1/2
antibody-positive sample which had been included in the pool by
mistake. The five pools each contained a single serum sample
(from subjects 1 to 5) which was HIV-1 RNA positive and
HIV-1/2 antibody negative, as confirmed by retesting of the
sera for the presence of HIV-1/2 antibody by three screening tests
(Abbott HIV1/2 AxSYM, VIDAS BioMérieux, GENSCREEN HIV1/2).
Western blot analysis was also negative for all five serum samples. The
five serum samples were tested individually for HIV-1 RNA
(Amplicor assay) and for the presence of p24 antigen and were positive
by both assays (Table 3).
The five HIV-1 RNA-positive, HIV-1/2 antibody-negative serum samples
were from individuals suffering from primary HIV-1 infection, as
established on the basis of clinical symptoms (data not shown) and
laboratory parameters (Table 3). Each individual presented with
seroconversion, i.e., the appearance of HIV-1-specific antibodies in plasma, during the follow-up period. Subjects 1 to 3 had been infected as a result of heterosexual contact, subject 4 had been infected as a result of homosexual contact, and subject 5 had been
infected as a result of intravenous drug abuse.
Centrifugation Amplicor assay.
Since the PEG Amplicor
assay is relatively complex, we developed a second, simpler assay
for the detection of HIV-1 RNA in pooled sera. This assay is based on a
previously described boosted Amplicor assay characterized by high-speed
centrifugation prior to purification of viral RNA (23). The
centrifugation Amplicor assay allows centrifugation of pools containing
as many as 60 individual serum samples (25 µl of each sample) in
1.5-ml tubes, accommodated by standard high-speed centrifuges (e.g.,
Heraeus Biofuge 28 RS). The analytical sensitivity of the
centrifugation assay is reported in Table
4. Four pools of 1.5 ml each containing 60 individual serum samples, 1 of which was from an HIV-1-infected individual and which had a known HIV-1 RNA copy number, were tested in
quintuplicate. The results indicate that HIV-1 RNA was detected in all
five pools containing approximately 12.5 copies and in four of five
pools containing approximately 6.25 copies. No inhibition of PCR
amplification was observed. Thus, the theoretical lower detection limit
for individual sera within pools (input volume, 25 µl per serum
sample) can be estimated to be 12.5 copies × 40 = 500 copies/ml, where 40 is a correction factor taking in account the 25 µl of volume of each serum sample introduced into the pool. Similar
results were obtained when the same experiment was repeated twice with
pools mixed with HIV-1 RNA containing either 10 or 5 copies provided by
sera from two other HIV-1-infected individuals. HIV-1 RNA was
detected in all pools containing 10 copies and in 59% of pools
containing 5 copies (data not shown).
We compared the ability of the Amplicor assay to detect HIV-1 RNA in
individual serum samples with that of the centrifugation Amplicor
assay to detect HIV-1 RNA in pools of 60 serum samples. Four serum
samples from seroconverting individuals, with HIV-1 RNA levels ranging
between 133,400 and 1,101,900 copies/ml, were tested in duplicate:
individually (200 µl) and mixed in a pool. Each pool contained 59 HIV-1 RNA-negative serum samples (1.475 ml) and 1 serum sample (25 µl) from a seroconverting subject. The ODs for HIV-1 RNA and IQS were
similar in both the Amplicor and the centrifugation Amplicor assays
(data not shown), indicating that the sensitivity of the centrifugation
Amplicor assay matches the sensitivity of the commercial assay for
specimens diluted 60 times.
 |
DISCUSSION |
The window period between HIV infection and its detection by
laboratory methods poses a challenge for the diagnosis of HIV-1 infection (4, 6, 26, 27). The infectious window period defines the time during which an individual is both infected and infectious prior to seroconversion. While the sensitivities of HIV
antibody detection assays have significantly improved since the tests
were first licensed in 1985 (2, 4, 5, 10, 28), the
infectious window period is still longer for the assays based on the
detection of anti-HIV antibodies than for the assays based on the
detection of viral nucleic acids. Indeed, the assays based on the
detection of HIV-1 RNA by PCR gave positive results 7 to 11 days before
the assays based on the detection of anti-HIV antibodies
(4). However, PCR for HIV-1 RNA is too expensive and
labor-intensive for routine diagnostic screening of single serum
specimens. A reduction in cost might be achieved by using an
assay with pooled samples, which reduces the amounts of both laboratory materials and the supplies required. The Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor kit for the detection of HIV-1 RNA costs about US$600. The kit
allows 24 assays to be performed; i.e., each assay costs the laboratory
about US$25. The patient pays about US$50 for an assay for HIV-1 RNA
performed with a single serum sample (US$25 for the Amplicor HIV-1
Monitor kit and US$25 for additional costs). Considering a mean pool
size of 45 serum samples, the assays with pooled sera described here
reduce the cost of screening of a single serum specimen for HIV-1 RNA
by a factor of 45, since only 1 assay (instead of 45 assays) needs to
be performed. Moreover, the assays with pooled sera can be performed in
a time-efficient manner. In 1 working day, using the PEG Amplicor
assay, a trained technician can test 15 to 20 pools containing
approximately 1,000 individual serum samples, i.e., 20 times more serum
samples than can be tested individually.
This study demonstrates that PCR for HIV-1 RNA can be performed with
large pools of sera for diagnostic purposes and that the sensitivities
of the PEG and centrifugation Amplicor assays for the detection of
HIV-1 RNA in individual serum samples within pools are equivalent to
the sensitivity of the Amplicor assay for the detection of HIV-1 RNA in
single serum samples, i.e., 500 copies/ml. Both assays with pooled
sera have a detection limit of between 5 and 10 copies/ml for total
HIV-1 RNA in pools (23) (Tables 1 and 4) and thus are 5 to
10 times more sensitive than the recently modified, ultrasensitive
Amplicor assays, which have detection limits of 50 copies/ml (18,
23). Of note, a very high analytical sensitivity is important for
the detection of suppressed viremia in patients treated with potent
antiretroviral drugs but not for the identification of HIV-1 RNA in
individuals with primary HIV infection prior to seroconversion. These
patients have elevated HIV-1 RNA levels, ranging between
103 and 108 copies/ml (3, 20).
The assays with pooled sera represent an alternative to additional
diagnostic procedures selected to complement diagnoses based on a
single antibody test. Thus, in countries such as France and
Switzerland, it is recommended that microbiology laboratories screen
individual serum samples by two commercial antibody-based assays.
However, the assays with pooled sera for the detection of HIV-1
RNA are likely to reduce the window period during which infection
can be detected to a greater extent than additional assays
for p24 antigen and/or HIV antibodies. One of the temporary limitations of the present pooled serum assays based on the
Amplicor assay is their inability to detect some of the non-B HIV-1
subtypes (1), but new PCR primers with a wider
range of detection for non-B HIV-1 subtypes are being released by
the Amplicor assay manufacturer (16).
According to the locally available equipment and local
needs, laboratories may give preference to one of the pooled serum assays described here. The centrifugation Amplicor assay requires a
high-speed centrifugation and the pipetting of small volumes (25 µl),
and the pool size is limited to 60 serum samples. The PEG Amplicor
assay may accommodate larger pools containing up to 80 serum samples,
allows for easier pipetting due to the use of larger volumes (100 µl), and does not require additional equipment for centrifugation.
Its main drawback is the necessity to transfer the pellet from a large
15-ml tube to a 1.5-ml tube.
Early recognition of primary HIV-1 infection has important implications
for treatment, prognosis, prevention of disease dissemination in the
community, and the safety of blood and tissue donations (4, 6, 7,
22, 24, 26, 27). The pooled serum assays described here with
10,692 consecutive HIV-1/2 antibody-negative serum samples sent to
microbiology laboratories for HIV-1 antibody testing led to the
identification of five individuals suffering from primary HIV-1
infection. This corresponds to an average of 1 infected serum sample
per 2,138 serum samples. There may be two explanations for this
relatively high incidence: first, the higher incidence of
HIV-1-infected individuals in a population of people screened for HIV-1
infection compared to the incidence in the general population and,
second, the relatively high prevalence of HIV-1 infection in
Switzerland compared to that in other Western countries
(14). All five individuals and their sexual partners likely
involved in the transmission of the infection are receiving potent antiviral combination therapy. They have been informed of their
infection status and how to protect their sexual partners. The early
identification of subjects with primary HIV infection might contribute
to a reduction in the spread of HIV.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This work was supported by the Swiss Federal Office of Public
Health and the National AIDS Research Program.
We thank K. Zollinger for excellent technical assistance.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Laboratory of
Virology and AIDS Center, Division of Infectious Diseases, Geneva
University Hospital, 1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland. Phone:
41.22/37.24.991. Fax: 41.22/37.24.990. E-mail:
luc.perrin{at}hcuge.ch.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Alaeus, A.,
K. Lidman,
A. Sönnerborg, and J. Albert.
1997.
Subtype-specific problems with quantification of plasma HIV-1 RNA.
AIDS
11:859-865[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Ayres, L.,
F. Avillez,
A. Garcia-Benito,
F. Deinhardt,
L. Gurtler,
F. Denis,
G. Leonard,
S. Ranger,
P. Grob,
H. Joller-Jemelka,
G. Hess,
S. Seidl,
H. Flacke,
F. Simon,
F. Brun-Vézinet,
D. Sondag,
A. André,
H. Hampl,
R. Schoen,
S. Stramer, and H. Troonen.
1990.
Multicenter evaluation of a new recombinant enzyme immunoassay for the combined detection of antibody to HIV-1 and HIV-2.
AIDS
4:131-138[Medline].
|
| 3.
| Baumberger, C., S. Kinloch-de-Loes, S. Yerly, B. Hirschel, and L. Perrin. 1993. High levels of circulating RNA in
patients with symptomatic HIV-1 infection. AIDS 7(Suppl.
2):S59-S64.
|
| 4.
|
Busch, M. P.,
L. L. Lee,
G. A. Satten,
D. R. Henrard,
H. Farzadegan,
K. E. Nelson,
S. Read,
R. Y. Dodd, and L. R. Petersen.
1995.
Time course of detection of viral and serologic markers preceding human immunodeficiency virus type 1 seroconversion: implications for screening of blood and tissue donors.
Transfusion
35:91-97[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Busch, M. P., and A. M. Couroucé.
1997.
Relative sensitivity of United States and European assays for screening blood donors for antibodies to human immunodeficiency virus.
Transfusion
37:352-353[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Couroucé, A. M.,
F. Barin,
M. Maniez,
C. Janot,
L. Noel, and M. H. Elghouzzi.
1992.
Effectiveness of assays for antibodies to HIV and p24 antigen to detect very recent HIV infections in blood donors. Retrovirus Study Group of the French Society of Blood Transfusion.
AIDS
6:1548-1550[Medline]. (Letter.)
|
| 7.
|
Coutlee, F.,
G. Delage,
F. Lamothe,
S. Cassol, and F. Decary.
1992.
Transmission of HIV-1 from seronegative but PCR-positive blood donors.
Lancet
340:59[Medline]. (Letter.)
|
| 8.
|
De Saussure, P.,
S. Yerly,
E. Tullen, and L. H. Perrin.
1993.
Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 nucleic acids detected before p24 antigenemia in a blood donor.
Transfusion
33:164-167[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Galetto-Lacour, A.,
S. Kinloch-de-Loës,
B. Hirschel, and L. Perrin.
1995.
Primo-infection VIH: un diagnostic souvent évoqué mais posé tardivement.
Schweiz. Med. Wochenschr.
125:341-346[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Gallarda, J. L.,
D. R. Henrard,
D. Liu,
S. Harrington,
S. L. Stramer,
J. E. Valinsky, and P. Wu.
1992.
Early detection of antibody to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 by using an antigen conjugate immunoassay correlates with the presence of immunoglobulin M antibody.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
30:2379-2384[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Holodniy, M.,
S. Kim,
D. Katzenstein,
M. Konrad,
E. Groves, and T. C. Merigan.
1991.
Inhibition of human immunodeficiency virus gene amplification by heparin.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
29:676-679[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Horsburgh, C. R.,
C. Y. Ou,
J. Jason,
S. D. Holmberg,
I. M. Longini,
C. Schable,
K. H. Mayer,
A. R. Lifson,
G. Schochetman, and J. W. Ward.
1989.
Duration of human immunodeficiency virus infection before detection of antibody.
Lancet
ii:637-640.
|
| 13.
|
Krivine, A.,
A. Yakudima,
M. Le May,
V. Pena-Cruz,
A. S. Huang, and K. McIntosh.
1990.
A comparative study of virus isolation, polymerase chain reaction, and antigen detection in children of mothers infected with human immunodeficiency virus.
J. Pediatr.
116:372-376[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Lederberger, B.,
J. von Overbeck,
M. Egger, and R. Lüthy.
1994.
The Swiss HIV cohort study: rationale, organization and selected baseline characteristics.
Soz. Präventivmed.
39:387-394[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
McMahon, E. J.,
C. Fang,
L. Layug, and S. G. Sandler.
1995.
Pooling blood donor samples to reduce the cost of HIV-1 antibody testing.
Vox Sang.
68:215-219[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Michael, N.,
M. Robb,
D. Birx,
J. R. Mascola,
J. Wang,
K. Dreyer,
K. McDonough,
C. Christopherson,
S. D. Lu,
S. Kwok, and S. Herman.
1997.
Performance of the Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor test and a modified HIV-1 Monitor test on HIV-1 subtypes A to F, abstr. 279.
In
Abstracts of the 4th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections.
|
| 17.
|
Mulder, J.,
N. McKinney,
C. Christopherson,
J. Sninsky,
L. Greenfield, and S. Kwok.
1994.
Rapid and simple PCR assay for quantitation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA in plasma: application to acute retroviral infection.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
32:292-300[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Mulder, J.,
R. Resnick,
B. Saget,
S. Scheibel,
S. Herman,
H. Payne,
R. Harrigan, and S. Kwok.
1997.
A rapid and simple method for extracting human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA from plasma: enhanced sensitivity.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
35:1278-1280[Abstract].
|
| 19.
|
Petersen, L. R.,
G. A. Satten,
R. Dodd,
M. Busch,
S. Kleinman,
A. Grindon, and B. Lenes.
1994.
Duration of time from onset of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infectiousness to development of detectable antibody. The HIV Seroconversion Study Group.
Transfusion
34:283-289[Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Piatak, M.,
M. S. Saag,
L. C. Yang,
S. J. Clark,
J. C. Kappes,
K. C. Luk,
B. H. Hahn,
G. M. Shaw, and J. D. Lifson.
1993.
High levels of HIV-1 in plasma during all stages of infection determined by comparative PCR.
Science
259:1749-1754.
|
| 21.
|
Revets, H.,
D. Marissens,
S. de Wit,
P. Lacor,
N. Clumeck,
S. Lauwers, and G. Zissis.
1996.
Comparative evaluation of NASBA HIV-1 RNA QT, AMPLICOR-HIV Monitor, and QUANTIPLEX HIV RNA assay, three methods for quantification of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA in plasma.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
34:1058-1064[Abstract].
|
| 22.
|
Schacker, T.,
A. C. Collier,
J. Hughes,
T. Shea, and L. Corey.
1996.
Clinical and epidemiologic features of primary HIV infection.
Ann. Intern. Med.
125:257-264[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Schockmel, G. A.,
S. Yerly, and L. Perrin.
1997.
Detection of low HIV-1 RNA levels in plasma.
J. Acquired Immune. Defic. Syndr. Hum. Retroviral.
14:179-183[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Schreiber, G. B.,
M. P. Busch,
S. H. Kleinman, and J. J. Korelitz.
1996.
The risk of transfusion-transmitted viral infections. The Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study.
N. Engl. J. Med.
334:1685-1690[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Sherlock, C. H.,
S. A. Strathdee,
T. Le,
D. Sutherland,
M. V. O'Shaughnessy, and M. T. Schechter.
1995.
Use of pooling and outpatient laboratory specimens in an anonymous seroprevalence survey of HIV infection in British Columbia, Canada.
AIDS
9:945-950[Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Simonds, R. J.,
S. D. Holmberg,
R. L. Hurwitz,
T. R. Coleman,
S. Bottenfield,
L. J. Conley,
S. H. Kohlenberg,
K. G. Castro,
B. A. Dahan,
C. A. Schable,
M. A. Rayfield, and M. F. Rogers.
1992.
Transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 from a seronegative organ and tissue donor.
N. Engl. J. Med.
326:726-732[Abstract].
|
| 27.
|
Ward, J. W.,
S. D. Holmberg,
J. R. Allen,
D. L. Cohen,
S. E. Critchley,
S. H. Kleinman,
B. A. Lenes,
O. Ravenholt,
J. R. Davis,
M. G. Quinn, and H. W. Jaffe.
1988.
Transmission of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) by blood transfusions screened as negative for HIV antibody.
N. Engl. J. Med.
318:473-478[Abstract].
|
| 28.
|
Zaaijer, H. L.,
P. van Exel-Oehlers,
T. Kraaijeveld,
E. Altena, and P. N. Lelie.
1992.
Early detection of antibodies to HIV-1 by third-generation assays.
Lancet
340:770-772[Medline].
|
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, June 1998, p. 1534-1538, Vol. 36, No. 6
0095-1137/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Westreich, D. J., Hudgens, M. G., Fiscus, S. A., Pilcher, C. D.
(2008). Optimizing Screening for Acute Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection with Pooled Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests. J. Clin. Microbiol.
46: 1785-1792
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Pilcher, C. D., Fiscus, S. A., Nguyen, T. Q., Foust, E., Wolf, L., Williams, D., Ashby, R., O'Dowd, J. O., McPherson, J. T., Stalzer, B., Hightow, L., Miller, W. C., Eron, J. J. Jr., Cohen, M. S., Leone, P. A.
(2005). Detection of Acute Infections during HIV Testing in North Carolina. NEJM
352: 1873-1883
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Pilcher, C. D., McPherson, J. T., Leone, P. A., Smurzynski, M., Owen-O'Dowd, J., Peace-Brewer, A. L., Harris, J., Hicks, C. B., Eron, J. J. Jr, Fiscus, S. A.
(2002). Real-time, Universal Screening for Acute HIV Infection in a Routine HIV Counseling and Testing Population. JAMA
288: 216-221
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Giachetti, C., Linnen, J. M., Kolk, D. P., Dockter, J., Gillotte-Taylor, K., Park, M., Ho-Sing-Loy, M., McCormick, M. K., Mimms, L. T., McDonough, S. H.
(2002). Highly Sensitive Multiplex Assay for Detection of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 and Hepatitis C Virus RNA. J. Clin. Microbiol.
40: 2408-2419
[Abstract]
[Full Text]