Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, June 1998, p. 1767-1768, Vol. 36, No. 6
0095-1137/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Low-Level Vancomycin Resistance in
Clostridium innocuum
Francine
Mory,1,*
Alain
Lozniewski,1
Veronique
David,2
Jean Philippe
Carlier,3
Luc
Dubreuil,4 and
Roland
Leclercq2
Laboratoire de Bactériologie,
Hôpital Central, Centre Hospitalier et Universitaire, 54035 Nancy
Cedex,1
Laboratoire de
Bactériologie-Virologie, Centre Hospitalier et Universitaire
Henri Mondor, 94010 Créteil Cedex,2
Centre National de Référence des
Anaérobies, Institut Pasteur, 75724 Paris Cedex
15,3 and
Laboratoire de
Microbiologie, Faculté de Pharmacie, 59006 Lille
Cedex,4 France
Received 15 December 1997/Returned for modification 24 February
1998/Accepted 12 March 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
Low-level vancomycin resistance was observed for 28 clinical
Clostridium innocuum isolates and C. innocuum
NCIB 10674, whereas teicoplanin was active. DNA from three clinical
isolates and the type strain could not be amplified by PCR with primers
specific for the genes vanA, vanB, and
vanC, suggesting that C. innocuum is
intrinsically resistant to vancomycin.
 |
TEXT |
Members of the genus
Clostridium are a major part of the anaerobic microflora of
humans and are a potential cause of human infections. Clostridium
innocuum belongs to the normal intestinal flora of human infants
and adults and is one of the species which have been reported to cause
human infections, such as intra-abdominal sepsis, bacteremia, and
endocarditis (5, 9, 12). However, its identification by
commercial kits remains unsatisfactory and requires, therefore, the use
of gas-liquid chromatography and additional conventional tests
(1). Clostridia are usually considered susceptible to
vancomycin and teicoplanin (8). Unexpectedly, we observed
that most C. innocuum strains isolated from
clinical specimens examined in the Laboratory of Bacteriology,
University Hospital Center, Nancy, France, had diminished inhibition
zone diameters (range, 14 to 16 mm) with vancomycin disks (30 µg) as determined by the agar diffusion method. Thus, we wished to determine the in vitro activities of vancomycin and teicoplanin against these
strains.
We studied 28 C. innocuum strains
consecutively isolated form 28 patients hospitalized at the University
Hospital Center of Nancy between 1993 and 1995 (blood,
n = 3; intra-abdominal pus, n = 25).
All these isolates have been identified as C. innocuum on the basis of morphological and biochemical
characteristics. Identification of three blood culture isolates was
confirmed by determination of the nucleotide sequence of a portion of
the 16S rRNA sequence. From genomic DNA, 311-bp fragments were
amplified by PCR with universal 16S rRNA oligonucleotides and sequenced (10). The nucleotide sequences of the three clinical
isolates and of C. innocuum NCIB 10674 displayed 99% identity and were distantly related to those of 33 other
Clostridium species determined by Collins et al.
(3). Strains were stored at
80°C in brucella broth
supplemented with 15% glycerol prior to assay. Clostridium perfringens ATCC 13124, Clostridium difficile ATCC
9689, and C. innocuum NCIB 10674 were
included as controls. In addition, the in vitro activities of
teicoplanin and vancomycin against 37 other clinical
Clostridium isolates, including C. perfringens (n = 12), C. difficile
(n = 11), Clostridium clostridioforme
(n = 5), Clostridium butyricum
(n = 4), Clostridium tertium
(n = 3), and Clostridium ramosum
(n = 2), were determined.
MICs of vancomycin (Lilly, St. Cloud, France) and teicoplanin (Marion
Merrell Dow, Levallois-Perret, France) were determined, as recommended
by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards
(11), by the agar dilution method on Wilkins-Chalgren agar (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Mich.). A final inoculum of 105 CFU per spot was delivered with a multipoint
inoculator. Cultures were then incubated at 35°C for 48 h in an
anaerobic chamber (Don Whitley Scientific Ltd., Shipley, United
Kingdom). MICs were defined as the lowest concentrations of each
antibiotic that inhibited visible growth on agar and were interpreted
in accordance with the guidelines of the Comité de
l'Antibiogramme de la Société Française de
Microbiologie (4).
A PCR assay was used to detect the presence of vanA,
vanB, vanC1, and vanC2 resistance
genes in the three clinical C. innocuum strains isolated from blood as well as in C. innocuum NCIB 10674. The PCR assay was performed as
described previously for the detection of glycopeptide resistance
genotypes in enterococci (6). Enterococcus faecium BM 4147 (vanA), Enterococcus
faecalis V 583 (vanB), Enterococcus gallinarum BM 4174 (vanC1), and Enterococcus
casseliflavus ATCC 25788 (vanC2) were used as controls.
Teicoplanin showed excellent activity against the C. innocuum strains tested, inhibiting all isolates at
concentrations ranging from 0.25 to 1 µg/ml (MIC at which 90% of the
isolates are inhibited [MIC90], 0.5 µg/ml). In
contrast, the MICs of vancomycin ranged from 8 to 16 µg/ml
(MIC90, 16 µg/ml), classifying all isolates as
intermediately resistant to this antibiotic, although 46% (13 of 28)
of strains had inhibition zone diameters as determined by the disk
diffusion method which were
17 mm. This confirms the poor correlation
existing between inhibition zone diameters and MICs for glycopeptide
susceptibility testing in gram-positive bacteria (2, 14).
Vancomycin was at least eight times more active against the other
Clostridium strains tested (Table
1).
No amplification product was observed with DNA from the four
C. innocuum strains tested by PCR,
suggesting that the low-level vancomycin resistance may be due to
genetic determinants other than those identified in enterococci.
Few previous studies have reported Clostridium species to be
intermediately resistant or even strongly resistant to vancomycin (1, 7, 13). In two of these studies (7, 13),
varied clostridial species were tested as one group of uniform
organisms, i.e., C. innocuum was not
distinguished from the other species. Alexander et al. (1)
have noted that 50 and 90% of the 21 strains of C. innocuum that they tested were inhibited by 4 and 8 µg of vancomycin per ml, respectively. However, these authors did not compare the inhibitory activities of vancomycin and teicoplanin. Except
for those for some strains which appeared to be susceptible to
vancomycin (MICs = 2 to 4 µg/ml), their results are similar to
ours since the difference in MIC90s was less than 2 dilutions. These differences could be explained in part by the use of
different susceptibility testing media.
Thus, to our knowledge, this report is the first description of
low-level vancomycin resistance without cross-resistance to teicoplanin
in C. innocuum. The fact that this
phenomenon was observed in all isolates tested suggests the
presence of intrinsic low-level vancomycin resistance, the
genetic basis and biochemical mechanism of which remain to be
investigated. Moreover, documenting low-level resistance to
vancomycin may aid in characterization of this species, identification
of which may be difficult (1).
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Laboratoire de
Bacteriologie, Hôpital Central, 29, Avenue du Maréchal de
Lattre de Tassigny, 54035 Nancy Cedex, France. Phone: (33)
3-83-85-14-34. Fax: (33) 3-83-85-26-73.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Alexander, C. J.,
D. M. Citron,
J. S. Brazier, and E. J. C. Goldstein.
1995.
Identification and antimicrobial resistance patterns of clinical isolates of Clostridium clostridioforme, Clostridium innocuum, and Clostridium ramosum compared with those of clinical isolates of Clostridium perfringens.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
33:3209-3215[Abstract].
|
| 2.
|
Barry, A. L.,
C. Thornsberry, and R. N. Jones.
1986.
Evaluation of teicoplanin and vancomycin disk susceptibility tests.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
23:100-103[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Collins, M. D.,
P. A. Lawson,
A. Willems,
J. J. Cordoba,
J. Fernandez-Garayzabal,
P. Garcia,
J. Cai,
H. Hippe, and J. A. E. Farrow.
1994.
The phylogeny of the genus Clostridium: proposal of five new genera and eleven new species combinations.
Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.
44:812-826[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Comité de l'Antibiogramme de la Société Française de Microbiologie.
1997.
Communiqué 1997.
Pathol. Biol.
45:1-12.
|
| 5.
|
Cutrona, A. F.,
C. Watanakunakorn,
C. R. Schaub, and A. Jagetia.
1995.
Clostridium innocuum endocarditis.
Clin. Infect. Dis.
21:1306-1307[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Dutka-Malen, S.,
S. Evers, and P. Courvalin.
1995.
Detection of glycopeptide resistance genotypes and identification to the species level of clinically relevant enterococci by PCR.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
33:24-27[Abstract].
|
| 7.
|
Fernandes, P. B.,
R. Bailer,
R. Swanson,
C. W. Hanson,
E. McDonald,
N. Ramer,
D. Hardy,
N. Shipkowitz,
R. R. Bower, and E. Gade.
1986.
In vitro and in vivo evaluation of A-56268 (TE-031), a new macrolide.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
30:865-873[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Glupczynski, Y.,
M. Labbe,
F. Orokaert, and E. Yourassowsky.
1984.
In vitro activity of teicoplanin and vancomycin against anaerobes.
Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol.
3:50-51[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Gorbach, S. L.,
H. Thadepalli, and J. Norsen.
1974.
Anaerobic microorganisms in intraabdominal infections, p. 399-407.
In
A. Balows, R. M. Dehaan, V. R. Dowell, Jr., and L. B. Guze (ed.), Anaerobic bacteria. Role in disease. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, Ill.
|
| 10.
|
Lawson, P. A.,
P. L. Perez,
R. A. Hutson,
H. Hippe, and M. D. Collins.
1993.
Towards a phylogeny of the clostridia based on 16S rRNA sequences.
FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
113:87-92[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards.
1993.
Methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria, vol. 3, no. 26. Approved standard, NCCLS publication M11-A3.
National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Villanova, Pa.
|
| 12.
|
Onderdonk, A. B., and S. D. Allen.
1995.
Clostridium, p. 574-586.
In
P. R. Murray, E. J. Baron, M. A. Pfaller, F. C. Tenover, and R. H. Yolken (ed.), Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 6th ed. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
|
| 13.
|
Ruckdeschel, G.
1991.
Vergleichende Untersuchungen zur Aktivität von Teicoplanin und Vancomycin gegen grampositive Bakterien.
Fortschr. Antimikr. Antineoplast. Chemother.
10:131-135.
|
| 14.
|
Swenson, J. M.,
B. C. Hill, and C. Thornsberry.
1989.
Problems with the disk diffusion test for detection of vancomycin resistance in enterococci.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
27:2140-2142[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, June 1998, p. 1767-1768, Vol. 36, No. 6
0095-1137/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
David, V., Bozdogan, B., Mainardi, J.-L., Legrand, R., Gutmann, L., Leclercq, R.
(2004). Mechanism of Intrinsic Resistance to Vancomycin in Clostridium innocuum NCIB 10674. J. Bacteriol.
186: 3415-3422
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Marchandin, H., Teyssier, C., Simeon de Buochberg, M., Jean-Pierre, H., Carriere, C., Jumas-Bilak, E.
(2003). Intra-chromosomal heterogeneity between the four 16S rRNA gene copies in the genus Veillonella: implications for phylogeny and taxonomy. Microbiology
149: 1493-1501
[Abstract]
[Full Text]