Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, August 1998, p. 2389-2391, Vol. 36, No. 8
0095-1137/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Rapid Screening Tests for Determining In Vitro
Susceptibility of Herpes Simplex Virus Clinical Isolates
Pedro
de la
Iglesia,*
Santiago
Melón,
Beatriz
López,
Mercedes
Rodriguez,
Maria I.
Blanco,
Purificación
Mellado, and
Maria
de
Oña
Laboratorio de Virología, Servicio de
Microbiologia, Hospital Covadonga, 33006 Oviedo, Asturias, Spain
Received 3 November 1997/Returned for modification 26 March
1998/Accepted 4 May 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
The susceptibility of human herpes simplex virus (HSV) to acyclovir
(ACV) was determined with the use of a single dose of the drug (1 and 2 µg of ACV per ml for HSV-1 and HSV-2, respectively) in two rapid
assays: a rapid cytopathic effect inhibitory assay (Rapid CIA) and a
rapid dye uptake assay (Rapid DUA). These tests allow the simultaneous
determination of virus titer and susceptibility to ACV at a determined
viral concentration (100 50% tissue culture infective doses and 100 50% dye uptake units). These tests were compared with a conventional
susceptibility assay (dye uptake assay) and showed similar results.
Indeterminate results with the Rapid CIA appeared in 3 of 30 samples.
With the use of both Rapid CIA and Rapid DUA, we were able to determine
the susceptibility of 100% of the isolates. The rapid tests, unlike
conventional assays, are able to provide susceptibility results within
3 days after the virus has been isolated from a clinical specimen and could thus play a direct role in therapeutic decisions.
 |
TEXT |
One of the most prominent successes
in the use of chemotherapy for virus infections is the discovery of an
antiherpetic agent, acyclovir (ACV). However, the appearance of
ACV-resistant mutants of herpes simplex virus (HSV) has been reported
after frequent use or prolonged treatment with ACV (3, 4).
The increasing number of effective antiviral therapies for the
treatment of several virus infections and the emergence of
drug-resistant virus strains underscore the need for rapid methods for
evaluating virus susceptibilities to these agents.
In this study, we evaluated the utility of two rapid screening tests
developed in our laboratory, Rapid CIA and Rapid DUA, which estimate
the susceptibility of an HSV strain to ACV within 3 days after the
virus has been isolated.
Thirty clinical isolates from HSV-infected patients (19 with HSV-1 and
11 with HSV-2) were used in the susceptibility studies. Specimens were
processed on the day of collection and inoculated into MRC-5 cells for
conventional tube culture and shell vial cell culture by standard
techniques. When >95% of the cells showed a cytopathic effect (CPE),
the supernatant was aspirated and centrifuged to clarity, and the
strains of virus were used for the determinations of drug sensitivity.
Control strains FP16 and 8 WT (ACV-susceptible) and 8 FCV
(ACV-resistant) were kindly provided by "Servicio de Microbiología Diagnóstica" (Instituto de Salud Carlos
III, Madrid, Spain). An ACV-resistant strain (FP16ACV) was obtained in
our laboratory by sequential passage of strain FP16 seven times in Vero
cells in the presence of 10 µg of ACV per ml (6).
Rapid CIA.
The rapid CPE inhibition assay (Rapid CIA) was
performed as follows. MRC-5 cells, Vero cells, or BGM cells were seeded
in a 96-well microtiter plate (Falcon no. 3075; Becton Dickinson, Lincoln Park, N.J.) until a confluent monolayer was obtained. Serial
10-fold dilutions of virus (ranging from 100 to
10
6) were done, and 100 µl of each dilution of virus
per well was inoculated in eight wells of a plate. One row of wells was
mock infected with 100 µl of culture medium per well as a cell
control. The microtiter tray was centrifuged for 45 min at 700 × g at room temperature, and the medium was then removed from
each well without disturbing the cells. Two hundred microliters of
culture medium was added to four wells of each viral dilution, and 200 µl of culture medium containing drug (1 µg of ACV per ml for HSV-1
or 2 µg of ACV per ml for HSV-2) was added to the remaining four wells of each viral dilution (1, 2, 7). After an incubation period of 72 h at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5%
CO2, the development of CPE was examined by light
microscopy. Subsequently, viral titration and calculation of the 50%
tissue culture infective dose (TCID50) by the
Kärber method were done in viral cultures both with and without
ACV (3a).
When the ratio obtained between the titer in the absence and that in
the presence of ACV was
10
2, the strain was considered
ACV susceptible (ACV 50% inhibitory concentration [IC50]
of <1 µg/ml for HSV-1 and ACV IC50 of <2 µg/ml for
HSV-2). Ratios lower than 10
1 indicated ACV resistance
(ACV IC50 of
1 µg/ml for HSV-1 and ACV IC50
of
2 µg/ml for HSV-2), and ratios between 10
1 and
10
1.9 were interpreted as indeterminate results.
Rapid DUA.
For the rapid dye uptake assay (Rapid DUA), virus,
cells, and compounds were prepared as described for the Rapid CIA.
After an incubation period of 72 h, 50 µl of a 0.15% solution
of neutral red in 0.1 M sodium phosphate monobasic buffer (pH 6) was
placed in each well. The plates were then incubated for 45 min at
37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2. After that,
medium and residual stain were removed, and the wells were rinsed twice
with phosphate-buffered saline (pH 6.5). Next, 150 µl of phosphate
ethanol buffer (0.1 M sodium phosphate monobasic and 95% ethanol at
1:1 [vol/vol]; pH 4.2) was distributed into each well for elution of
the dye incorporated by supposedly viable cells. The optical density of the solutions was read at 550 nm (OD550) with an automatic
spectrophotometer (Titertek Multiskan; Flow Laboratories, Inc., McLean,
Va.).
The mean OD of the cell control wells was determined, and only wells
showing a mean OD ± 10% were considered in further calculations.
This mean OD was assigned a value of 100%. The mean OD of the
virus
control wells was assigned a value of 0%. The titer of virus
was
expressed as a 50% dye uptake value (DU
50) and was
calculated
by determining the dilution of virus producing a 50% OD
reading
by linear regression analysis of the data. The percentage of
protection
of virus-infected cells from HSV-induced destruction due to
ACV
was calculated for each virus dilution by the formula
where (OD
ACV)
MOCK,
(OD
ACV)
HSV, (OD
NO
ACV)
MOCK, and (OD
NO ACV)
HSV
indicate the mean absorbances of the mock-infected control
with ACV,
test sample with ACV, mock-infected control without
ACV, and
virus-infected control, respectively.
The percentage of protection values at each dilution of virus were used
to carry out a linear regression analysis of the data,
and then the
susceptibility to ACV (percentage of protection)
was calculated at a
virus concentration of 100 DU
50s.
When the percentage of protection was >50%, the HSV strain was
considered susceptible to ACV (ACV IC
50 of <1 µg/ml for
HSV-1
and ACV IC
50 of <2 µg/ml for HSV-2). When this
percentage of protection
was

50%, the strain was considered
resistant (ACV IC
50 of

1
µg/ml for HSV-1 and ACV
IC
50 of

2 µg/ml for HSV-2) (
5).
The DUA was carried out according to normal procedures (
5).
We considered ACV resistance as an IC
50 of

1 µg/ml for
HSV-1
and

2 µg/ml for HSV-2, and we defined susceptibility to ACV
as
an IC
50 of <1 µg/ml for HSV-1 and <2 µg/ml for
HSV-2 (
1,
2,
7).
Results.
ACV susceptibility was determined in 30 clinical
isolates of HSV (19 HSV-1 and 11 HSV-2) and 4 control strains (2 ACV
susceptible and 2 ACV resistant) by Rapid CIA, Rapid DUA, and
traditional DUA. In Table 1 are shown the
mean ACV IC50s mean percentages of protection at a virus
concentration of 100 DU50s, and mean titer ratios of the 30 strains isolated from clinical samples according to whether they were
resistant to ACV or not. The ACV-susceptible control strains (8 WT and
FP16) with IC50s of <1 µg/ml corresponded to titer
ratios of >10
2 and percentages of protection at 100 DU50s of >50%. The ACV-resistant control strains (8 FCV
and FP16ACV) with IC50s >1 µg/ml corresponded to titer
ratios of <10
1, and the percentage of protection at 100 DU50 was <50%. Two out of 30 clinical isolates, both
HSV-1 strains, were shown to be ACV resistant by all three methods.
Three HSV-1 strains showed an indeterminate result by Rapid CIA (titer
ratios of between 10
1.5 and 10
1.66) and
were shown to be ACV susceptible by Rapid DUA and traditional DUA, and
the remaining isolates were ACV susceptible by all three methods.
Furthermore, increasing IC50s corresponded with diminishing of titer ratios and disminishing percentages of protection. (Table 2).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1.
Comparison of mean (± standard deviation)
IC50s, titer ratios, and percentages of protection
at 100 DU50s for HSV-1 and HSV-2
|
|
Discussion.
In the present study, a good correlation was
observed between the results with the Rapid CIA and those with the
traditional DUA. Strains of known sensibility were tested repeatedly,
and in all cases, the susceptibility results determined by both methods agreed. In our method, we consider a strain to be sensitive to ACV when
the titer ratio of the virus is at least 10
2, this equals
the reduction of 100 TCID50s. We observe that all of the
strains with differences of
10
2 for Rapid CIA
corresponded to strains sensitive to ACV by the traditional method.
Furthermore, strains that showed a titer ratio <10
1 were
also shown to be resistant to ACV by the traditional method. According
to the mathematical model, the limit of susceptibility to ACV
corresponds to a titer ratio of
10
1.7. Due to the fact
that the determination of CPE is accomplished in a qualitative way, we
consider the results with titer ratios of between 10
1 and
10
1.9 to be indeterminate.
There was also complete correlation between Rapid DUA and traditional
methods: strains with a percentage of protection >50%
corresponded to
strains sensitive to ACV, and strains with a percentage
of protection
<50% corresponded to resistant ones. The three strains
which gave an
indeterminate result with Rapid CIA and were susceptible
by the
traditional method were also shown to be susceptible by
Rapid DUA.
In summary, rapid CIA is a fast and repetitive method for the rapid
determination of the susceptibility of HSV-1 and HSV-2
to ACV,
employing a single dose of the drug which is related to
the limits of
susceptibility of the virus (1 µg of ACV per ml
for HSV-1 or 2 µg
of ACV per ml for HSV-2). This method, combined
with the Rapid DUA
method, allowed the determination of susceptibility
in 100% of the HSV
isolates.
These methods could be employed to determine the susceptibility of HSV
to other antiviral agents and could also be used in
studies of
susceptibility of other cytopathic viruses (cytomegalovirus
and
varicella-zoster virus).
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank the Hospital of Asturias for providing clinical samples
and data and Guillermo Viejo, Ana Martinez, and Flor Hidalgo for
editorial assistance.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Laboratorio de
Virología, Servicio de Microbiología, Hospital
Covadonga, Celestino Villamil, s. n., 33006 Oviedo, Asturias,
Spain. Phone: 34-8-5108720. Fax: 34-8-5108015. E-mail:
virologia{at}hcq.es.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Chatis, P. A., and C. S. Crumpacker.
1992.
Resistance of herpesviruses to antiviral drugs.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
36:1589-1595[Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
| Decker, C., M. N. Ellis, C. McLaren, G. Hunter, J. Rogers, and D. W. Barry. 1983. Virus resistance in
clinical practice. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
12(Suppl. B):137-152.
|
| 3.
|
Englund, J. A.,
M. E. Zimmerman,
E. M. Swierkosz,
J. L. Goodman,
D. R. Scholl, and H. H. Balfour, Jr.
1990.
Herpes simplex virus resistant to acyclovir. A study in a tertiary care center.
Ann. Intern. Med.
320:416-422.
|
| 3a.
|
Hawkes, R. A.
1979.
General principles underlying laboratory diagnosis of viral infections, p. 3-48.
In
E. H. Lennette, and N. J. Schmidt (ed.), Diagnostic procedures for viral, rickettsial, and chlamydial infections, 5th ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C.
|
| 4.
|
Kost, R. G.,
E. L. Hill,
M. Tigges, and S. E. Straus.
1993.
Recurrent acyclovir-resistant genital herpes in an immunocompetent patient.
N. Engl. J. Med.
329:1777-1782[Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
McLaren, C.,
M. N. Ellis, and G. A. Hunter.
1983.
A colorimetric assay for the measurement of the sensitivity of herpes simplex viruses to antiviral agents.
Antiviral Res.
3:223-234[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Swierkosz, E. M.,
D. R. Scholl,
J. L. Brown,
J. D. Jollick, and C. A. Gleaves.
1987.
Improved DNA hybridization method for detection of acyclovir-resistant herpes simplex virus.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
31:1465-1469[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Whitley, R. J., and J. W. Gnann, Jr.
1992.
Acyclovir: a decade later.
N. Engl. J. Med.
327:782-789[Medline].
|
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, August 1998, p. 2389-2391, Vol. 36, No. 8
0095-1137/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Chutkowski, C., Olson, B., McDonough, A., Mahoney, J., McSharry, J. J.
(2002). Use of a Single Monoclonal Antibody To Determine the Susceptibilities of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 and Type 2 Clinical Isolates to Acyclovir. CVI
9: 1379-1381
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sahli, R., Andrei, G., Estrade, C., Snoeck, R., Meylan, P. R. A.
(2000). A Rapid Phenotypic Assay for Detection of Acyclovir-Resistant Varicella-Zoster Virus with Mutations in the Thymidine Kinase Open Reading Frame. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
44: 873-878
[Abstract]
[Full Text]