Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, September 1998, p. 2735-2736, Vol. 36, No. 9
Department of Veterinary Internal Medicine,
Received 10 March 1998/Returned for modification 29 April
1998/Accepted 11 June 1998
A total of 1,523 adult Ixodes ricinus ticks were
collected from regions where bovine ehrlichiosis is endemic and were
examined for Ehrlichia phagocytophila via PCR. Of the ticks
from cattle with ehrlichiosis, the ticks from healthy cattle, and the
free-living ticks, 26.5% (18 of 68), 4.4% (35 of 802), and 0.8% (5 of 653), respectively, were positive.
Bovine ehrlichiosis is a
highly febrile, systemic disease caused by Ehrlichia
phagocytophila and transmitted by Ixodes ricinus (7). In Switzerland, areas in which bovine ehrlichiosis is endemic are usually found in subalpine regions that provide an ideal
biotope for ticks (11, 16). Tick activity can be determined quantitatively by assessing the tick infestation of cattle and is
usually moderate in May and June, low in July and August, and high in
September. The seroprevalence for E. phagocytophila within a
cattle herd has a course parallel to that of tick activity (12, 14). Methods to identify rickettsias in tick cells include
indirect immunofluorescence, staining according to the method of
Giménez, the hemolymph test, and electron microscopy (4, 6,
18). In addition, PCR has recently been used as a more sensitive
means of identifying Ehrlichia DNA in ticks (1-3,
10). The purpose of this study was to determine, via nested PCR,
the prevalence of E. phagocytophila in adult I. ricinus ticks from regions where bovine ehrlichiosis is endemic.
Tick collection.
A total of 1,523 morphologically adult ticks
of the species I. ricinus were collected in three
regions of Switzerland where bovine ehrlichiosis is endemic (Schinberg,
Obwalden; Tobelwald, St. Gallen; and Santa Maria, Tessin) during the
pasture season of 1997. Of these, 68 were female ticks from six cows
with bovine ehrlichiosis. The diagnosis was based on clinical signs and
on the detection of Ehrlichia organisms in buffy coat smears
and via nested PCR of leukocytes. Eight hundred two female ticks were removed from healthy calves, heifers, and cows. Animals were determined to be clinically healthy when the rectal temperature, general attitude
and behavior, appetite, and milk production (in lactating cows) were
normal. The ticks were divided into two groups according to the degree
of engorgement: group 1 consisted of nonfed ticks and group 2 consisted
of fed ticks (Table 1). In addition, 653 free-living ticks were collected. This was achieved with an umbrella that was covered with a terry towel and repeatedly pushed through the
fern-rich vegetation during inspections of the pastures.
Processing of tick specimens.
The ticks were examined
morphologically and then frozen at Nested PCR.
The methods used for nested PCR for identification
of the members of the E. phagocytophila group have been
described previously (2, 13). The sensitivity of the PCR
method was assessed by dilution of an Escherichia
coli-cloned 16S rRNA gene segment from E. phagocytophila of approximately 1,200 bp. The linearized plasmid DNA was diluted with purified DNA from noninfected, nonfed, and fed
adult ticks. The sensitivity of the PCR under these conditions was
10 copies. In contrast, a single copy of the linearized
double-stranded DNA could be identified in purified herring sperm DNA.
The inhibition effects were not apparent when 10% of the original tick
DNA amount was used and when the DNA was heated to 95°C for 5 min before performance of the PCR (data not shown). Negative
controls included DNA from 50 noninfected adult ticks of the
I. ricinus species that were bred at the Institute of
Zoology in Neuchâtel (Switzerland).
DNA sequencing.
The nucleotide sequences of three isolated PCR
products each from ticks from diseased and healthy cattle and from
free-living ticks were determined by use of an ABI 377 DNA sequencer
(Microsynth, Balgach, Switzerland) and compared to the 16S rRNA gene
sequence of E. phagocytophila (GenBank accession no.
M73220).
Results.
The prevalence of PCR-positive ticks from the
different sources and the sex of the ticks are shown in Table
2. Of 68 ticks from diseased cattle, 18 were positive for E. phagocytophila via nested PCR. Of
the 802 ticks from healthy cattle and of the 653 free-living ticks, 35 and 5, respectively, were positive. The PCR was negative for
the 50 control ticks. The distribution of the PCR-positive ticks
from diseased and healthy cattle by engorgement status is shown in
Table 3. It was apparent that the
percentages of positive ticks from diseased cattle were similar in the
two groups, whereas in ticks from healthy cattle, there was a slight but not significant (Fisher's exact test, P = 0.15)
increase in the percentage of positive engorged ticks.
0095-1137/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Detection of Ehrlichia phagocytophila
DNA in Ixodes ricinus Ticks from Areas in Switzerland
Where Tick-Borne Fever Is Endemic
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
![]()
TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
TABLE 1.
Distribution of 1,523 adult I. ricinus
ticks according to origin, sex, and engorgement status
20°C until DNA extraction was
performed. Each individual tick was placed in 200 µl of buffered
phosphate solution in an Eppendorf tube and mechanically homogenized.
The DNA extraction was performed with a QIAamp Tissue Kit (Qiagen,
Basel, Switzerland) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
TABLE 2.
Results of nested PCR for the identification of
E. phagocytophila in 1,523 adult
I. ricinus ticks
TABLE 3.
Distribution of PCR-positive I. ricinus
ticks from cattle with bovine ehrlichiosis and from healthy
cattle according to engorgement status
Discussion. The prevalence of PCR-positive ticks varied with the origin of the ticks. The lowest prevalence (0.8%) occurred in free-living, adult I. ricinus ticks. In a study by Barlough et al. (3), nested PCR of 1,112 adult Ixodes pacificus ticks from seven different regions of California revealed an identical prevalence of members of the E. phagocytophila group. Cinco et al. (5) found a prevalence of 24.4% in nymphs examined for E. phagocytophila. Possible reasons for this discrepancy could be geographic, seasonal, or tick-stadium-associated differences between different tick populations. Interestingly, in this study the prevalence was 5.5 times higher in ticks from clinically healthy cattle than in free-living ticks. This could possibly be explained by a multiplication of E. phagocytophila organisms in response to the ingestion of blood. In support of this possibility, Smith et al. (15) and Lewis et al. (8) reported that a partial blood meal in Rhipicephalus sanguineus nymphs, infected with Ehrlichia canis in the larval stage, was necessary to cause ehrlichiosis in dogs. This has also been suggested for Ixodes spp. infected with agents of the E. phagocytophila genogroup (9, 17). In this study, there was a trend toward an increase in prevalence with an increase in engorgement status of the ticks from clinically healthy cattle; this may have been due to more efficient detection of E. phagocytophila organisms after a period of reactivation. In this population of ticks, the possible uptake of E. phagocytophila-infected blood prior to removal from the host did not likely play a major role in determining the prevalence. In contrast, the uptake of infected blood appeared to be the principal cause of the high prevalence of PCR-positive ticks among those collected from cattle with bovine ehrlichiosis; the prevalence in this population was six times higher than that in ticks from clinically healthy cattle. Although the number of ticks collected from cattle with bovine ehrlichiosis was small, there was no apparent difference in prevalence among ticks of differing engorgement status. Further studies are required to determine whether factors such as regional or seasonal variability of E. phagocytophila-infected ticks or in the Ehrlichia life cycle affect the prevalence of E. phagocytophila in ticks.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This study was supported by the Kommission zur Förderung des akademischen Nachwuchses.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Veterinary Internal Medicine, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 260, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland. Phone: (0041) 1 635 83 51. Fax: (0041) 1 635 89 06. E-mail: pusterla{at}vetmed.unizh.ch.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Anderson, B. E., K. G. Sims, J. G. Olson, J. E. Childs, J. F. Piesman, C. M. Happ, G. O. Maupin, and B. J. B. Johnson. 1993. Amblyomma americanum: a potential vector of human ehrlichiosis. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 49:239-244. |
| 2. | Barlough, J. E., J. E. Madigan, E. DeRock, and L. Bigornia. 1996. Nested polymerase chain reaction for detection of Ehrlichia equi genomic DNA in horses and ticks (Ixodes pacificus). Vet. Parasitol. 63:319-329[Medline]. |
| 3. | Barlough, J. E., J. E. Madigan, V. L. Kramer, J. R. Clover, L. T. Hui, J. P. Webb, and L. K. Vredevoe. 1997. Ehrlichia phagocytophila genogroup rickettsiae in ixodid ticks from California collected in 1995 and 1996. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:2018-2021[Abstract]. |
| 4. | Burgdorfer, W. 1970. Hemolymph test. A technique for detection of rickettsiae in ticks. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 19:1010-1014. |
| 5. | Cinco, M., D. Padovan, R. Murgia, M. Maroli, L. Frusteri, M. Heldtander, K.-E. Johansson, and E. Olsson Engvall. 1997. Coexistence of Ehrlichia phagocytophila and Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in Ixodes ricinus ticks from Italy as determined by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:3365-3366[Medline]. |
| 6. | Giménez, D. F. 1964. Staining rickettsiae in yolk-sac cultures. Stain Technol. 39:135-140[Medline]. |
| 7. | Hudson, J. R. 1950. The recognition of tick-borne fever as a disease of cattle. Br. Vet. J. 106:3-17. |
| 8. | Lewis, G. E., M. Ristic, R. D. Smith, T. Lincoln, and E. H. Stephenson. 1977. The brown dog tick Rhipicephalus sanguineus and the dog as experimental hosts of Ehrlichia canis. Am. J. Vet. Res. 38:1953-1955[Medline]. |
| 9. | MacLeod, J. 1936. Studies in tick-borne fever of sheep. II. Experiments on transmission and distribution of the disease. Parasitology 28:320-329. |
| 10. | Pancholi, P., C. P. Kolbert, P. D. Mitchell, K. D. Reed, J. S. Dumler, J. S. Bakken, S. R. Telford, and D. H. Persing. 1995. Ixodes dammini as a potential vector of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis. J. Infect. Dis. 172:1007-1012[Medline]. |
| 11. | Pusterla, N., B. Steiger, U. Schorno, and U. Braun. 1997. Auftreten von boviner Ehrlichiose im Kanton Obwalden. Schweiz. Arch. Tierheilkd. 139:392-396[Medline]. |
| 12. | Pusterla, N., C. Wolfensberger, H. Lutz, and U. Braun. 1997. Serologische Untersuchungen über das Vorkommen der bovinen Ehrlichiose in den Kantonen Zürich, Schaffhausen, Thurgau, St. Gallen und Obwalden. Schweiz. Arch. Tierheilkd. 139:543-549[Medline]. |
| 13. | Pusterla, N., J. Huder, C. Wolfensberger, U. Braun, and H. Lutz. 1997. Laboratory findings in cows after experimental infection with Ehrlichia phagocytophila. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 4:643-647[Abstract]. |
| 14. |
Pusterla, N.,
J. Berger Pusterla,
U. Braun, and H. Lutz.
1998.
Serological, hematologic, and PCR studies of cattle in an area of Switzerland in which tick-borne fever (caused by Ehrlichia phagocytophila) is endemic.
Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol.
5:325-327 |
| 15. | Smith, R. D., D. M. Sells, E. H. Stephenson, M. Ristic, and D. L. Huxsoll. 1976. Development of Ehrlichia canis, causative agent of canine ehrlichiosis, in the tick Rhipicephalus sanguineus and its differentiation from a symbiotic rickettsia. Am. J. Vet. Res. 37:119-126[Medline]. |
| 16. | Streit, M. 1993. Doctoral thesis. University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. |
| 17. |
Telford, S. R., III,
J. E. Dawson,
P. Katavolos,
C. K. Warner,
C. P. Kolbert, and D. H. Persing.
1996.
Perpetuation of the agent of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis in a deer tick-rodent cycle.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:6209-6214 |
| 18. | Webster, K. A., and G. B. B. Mitchell. 1989. An electron microscopic study of Cytoecetes phagocytophila infection in Ixodes ricinus. Res. Vet. Sci. 47:30-33[Medline]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. |
|---|---|
| Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |
|---|