Journal of Clinical Microbiology, September 1998, p. 2782-2783, Vol. 36, No. 9
0095-1137/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Isolation of Francisella tularensis by
Centrifugation of Shell Vial Cell Culture from an Inoculation
Eschar
Pierre-Edouard
Fournier,1
Lionel
Bernabeu,1
Bernard
Schubert,2
Maryse
Mutillod,1
Veronique
Roux,1 and
Didier
Raoult1,*
Unité des Rickettsies, CNRS:UPRESA
6020, Faculté de Médecine, Université de la
Méditerranée, 13385 Marseille Cedex
05,1 and
Service de
Dermatologie-Vénéréologie, Hopital E. Muller,
68070 Mulhouse Cedex,2 France
Received 20 February 1998/Returned for modification 24 April
1998/Accepted 21 May 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
A 52-year-old man was admitted to the hospital following the
development of an inoculation eschar and fever six days after being
bitten by a tick. He was clinically diagnosed as suffering from
rickettsiosis. Eschar biopsy cultures on standard bacteriological media
remained sterile. However, inoculation of cells with the homogenized
specimen by the centrifugation-shell vial technique (M. Marrero and D. Raoult, Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 40:197-199, 1989) resulted in the
recovery of a bacterium. Determination of the sequence of the 16S rRNA
gene amplified from the organism and comparison of the sequence to
other sequences identified it as a strain of Francisella
tularensis, whereas the specific serology was still negative. Our
findings demonstrate that the centrifugation-cell culture, which
is a tool for investigation of tick-transmitted diseases, may have the
potential to serve as a method for the cultural isolation of F. tularensis.
 |
TEXT |
Tularemia, caused by the facultative
intracellular bacterium Francisella tularensis, is endemic
in certain areas of the northern hemisphere. Diagnosis relies upon
clinical, epidemiological, and microbiological evidence (6).
In France it is a rare disease, being diagnosed mainly in the
northeastern part of the country. Current laboratory diagnosis of
tularemia relies upon serology, as cultivation of Francisella
tularensis can be performed only on special media in high-level
biosafety containment-equipped laboratories because of its highly
infectious nature (6). In our laboratory we have developed a
centrifugation-cell culture system, the shell vial assay
(4), which has been adapted for bacterial isolation and
which is used routinely in a biosafety level 3-equipped laboratory
(1) for the isolation of rickettsiae and other strictly or
facultatively intracellular bacteria from tissue biopsies, especially
tick-bite eschars, and blood samples. In this report we describe the
first application of this method to the clinical isolation of F. tularensis.
A 52-year-old, immunocompetent man was walking in a forest near
Mulhouse, in Alsace, eastern France, on 1 May 1997, when he was bitten
on his back by a tick. Four days later, he developed a painful
interscapular inoculation eschar at the site of the bite. Within two
additional days he developed an infectious syndrome with fatigue,
high-grade fever (104°F [40°C]), chills, headache, myalgias,
cutaneous hyperesthesia, and a right supraclavicular adenopathy.
Despite oral antibiotic treatment combining 3,000 mg of amoxicillin
with 750 mg of clavulanic acid per day, the febrile syndrome persisted
and the patient was admitted to the hospital in Mulhouse. On
physical examination, the physician observed an interscapular papule
with centralized necrosis surrounded by an inflamed area and pustules.
The patient also had a painless, mobile, right supraclavicular
adenopathy.
The following biological results were identified: an inflammatory
syndrome (C-reactive protein, 65.4 mg/liter; fibrinogen, 6.2 g/liter;
erythrocyte sedimentation rate, 26 mm [first hour]), leukocyte count
of 4,300/mm3, thrombopenia (139,000 platelets/mm3), and hepatic cytolysis
(alanine-aminotransferase, 55 IU/liter; aspartate aminotransferase, 47 IU/liter).
F. tularensis microagglutination assay was negative on
13 May, and thus the physician suspected a rickettsiosis. The
same serum sample and an eschar biopsy were therefore sent to our
laboratory for rickettsia serology and culture. Tetracycline (200 mg
per day) was then administered for two weeks, and the
patient fully recovered within a few days of the start of this
therapy.
The cutaneous biopsy was inoculated onto human embryonic lung (HEL)
fibroblasts in shell vials on 14 May by methods described previously
(4, 5). All of the following steps were performed under a
class II biosafety hood in a biosafety level 3-equipped laboratory
(1). Briefly, the eschar biopsy was homogenized in 1 ml of
sterile brain heart infusion broth, and the homogenate was aspirated
into a 1-ml syringe through a 27 gauge needle to filter out coarse
material. Following Gram and Gimenez staining regimens, which were
negative, the sample was inoculated into shell vials (3.7 ml; Sterilin,
Feltham, England) containing a monolayer of confluent HEL fibroblasts
grown on a 1-cm2 coverslip. Three shell vials were
inoculated and then centrifuged for 1 h at 700 × g and 22°C. The brain heart infusion was discarded and
replaced with culture medium (Eagle's minimal essential medium with
4% fetal bovine serum and 2 mM L-glutamine). After
incubation for three days at 32°C, a coverslip from one shell vial
was stained by the Gimenez method. Small extracellular and apparently
intracellular coccobacilli were observed, but they failed to react with
anti-Rickettsia conorii or anti-Coxiella burnetii
antiserum when incorporated into an indirect immunofluorescence assay.
However, the patient's own serum reacted to these bacteria, with
antibody titers of 1:32 for immunoglobulin G (IgG) and 1:32 for IgM. We
could also grow the bacterium on L929 mouse fibroblasts. To determine
whether it would grow in the cell culture medium alone, the isolated
microorganism was inoculated and cultivated under the same conditions
described above but without cells. No growth of the organism was
obtained. At the same time, the same specimen was inoculated onto 5%
sheep blood agar, chocolate agar, and Trypticase soy agar
(bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France) and incubated in a 5%
CO2 atmosphere for 24 h, but the culture remained
sterile.
Concurrently, DNA was extracted from ground eschar biopsy with the
QIAmp Tissue kit (QIAGEN GmbH, Hilden, Germany) according to the
supplier's recommendations. Initially, these extracts were used as
templates in a spotted fever group rickettsia-specific PCR
(8). However, no amplification product was obtained. DNA was
extracted from the cultivated bacteria (as described above) and then
subjected to a PCR assay incorporating the versatile primers fD1 and
rP2, derived from the 16S rRNA-encoding gene sequences (13).
This amplification yielded a 1,400-bp fragment, which was sequenced as
previously described (9). Sequencing reactions were resolved
on 6% polyacrylamide gels (Ready Mix Gels, automated laser fluorescent
grade; Pharmacia Biotech Europe, Brussels, Belgium), and
electrophoresis was performed in the automated laser fluorescent DNA
sequencer (Pharmacia Biotech Europe) in 1× TBE buffer, pH 8 (44.5 mM Tris-HCl, 44.5 mM boric acid, 1 mM EDTA). The sequence obtained was compared with other sequences in the GenBank database with
FASTA, in the PHYLIP software (7). A 99.9% sequence
similarity was obtained with F. tularensis biogroup
palearctica. Once the organism was identified, we subcultured the
isolated bacterium on a special medium (cystine-glucose-5% sheep
blood agar) and incubated it at 37°C in a 5% CO2
atmosphere for four days. On the second day, blue-gray, round, smooth
colonies that were moderately alpha-hemolytic appeared. Confirmation of
the identification of F. tularensis was obtained by a slide
agglutination test (Difco, Detroit, Mich.).
A second serum sample was obtained on 30 May, 25 days after the onset
of symptoms. The F. tularensis microagglutination assay was
positive with this sample, with a titer of 1:40. A third serum sample,
taken on 4 July, yielded a titer of 1:160. With the indirect immunofluorescence assay, titers of antibody to the patient's strain
of 1:64 for IgG and 1:32 for IgM were found for the second serum
sample; antibody titers of 1:256 for IgG and 1:64 for IgM were found
for the third.
In Europe the most commonly encountered human-pathogenic F. tularensis strain is F. tularensis biogroup
palearctica, which is transmitted by mosquitos and ticks (2,
6). The most common portals of entry in humans are
the skin and the respiratory tract (2). In areas of high
endemicity, physicians are aware of the six classic forms of tularemia,
namely, ulceroglandular, glandular, oculoglandular, pharyngeal,
typhoidal, and pneumonic. Diagnosis is guided by recognition by
clinical symptoms and confirmed by serological results or
culture. Several serology methods are available, including tube
agglutination, microagglutination, hemagglutination, and
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (10, 12).
Serological diagnosis requires a fourfold or greater rise in
antibody titer between acute- and convalescent-phase sera, although
samples may need to be repeated at 7- to 10-day intervals before a rise
in antibody titer is demonstrated. Because of its highly biohazardous nature, only laboratories with specially equipped biohazard containment facilities and experienced personnel are able to work with F. tularensis. This bacterium has been recovered from blood, pleural fluid, lymph nodes, wounds, sputum, gastric aspirate, and inoculation eschar biopsies with specialized media. Colonies become apparent after
2 to 4 days of incubation (6). Other methods for rapid diagnosis include direct fluorescent-antibody staining of smears and tissues, antigen detection in urine, RNA hybridization with a
16S rRNA probe, and PCR (3, 11).
In France, tularemia is encountered only rarely, and since
F. tularensis does not grow on standard bacteriological
media, French physicians do not generally include it in the
differential diagnosis of tick-bite infections. The national incidence
of tularemia may therefore be underestimated.
The centrifugation-shell vial system (4) is a versatile
method which can be applied to many viruses and most facultative or
strictly intracellular bacteria. As a reference center for the
diagnosis and study of rickettsioses, we have used this technique routinely and successfully to cultivate Rickettsia spp.,
C. burnetii, and Bartonella spp. from
clinical specimens, including inoculation eschar biopsies. Because of
the considerable virulence and contagiousness of C. burnetii, and to avoid any risk of aerosolization, in our laboratory the culture and DNA amplification procedures with any specimen are routinely performed in a biosafety level 3 facility under
a class II biosafety hood. Identification of every isolated bacterium
is obtained following PCR amplification and sequencing of genes
coding for 16S rRNA. In the present study, although the suspected
diagnosis was a rickettsiosis, use of the shell vial system permitted
the isolation of F. tularensis from our patient at a stage
when clinical symptoms and serology had not permitted a diagnosis.
To our knowledge, this is the first diagnosis of tularemia made using
the shell vial cell culture of a patient's specimens. Since shell
vials remain closed during the centrifugation and incubation steps and
cells are fixed with methanol before staining, we believe that this
technique is less hazardous than culture on solid media for the
isolation of F. tularensis.
The results of this study suggest that the centrifugation-shell vial
system supports the cultural recovery of F. tularensis from
a biopsy specimen. Presently, it is unclear whether the organism is
capable of intracellular growth in the two cell lines tested but
apparently the cells are a necessary prerequisite since the organism is
incapable of growing in the cell-free shell vial medium. Although
additional study is needed, we recommend the routine use of the shell
vial cell culture system for the isolation of tick-transmitted
pathogens in patients with an inoculation eschar. When performed as
described in this study, the procedure is safe and time-saving.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Unité des
rickettsies, CNRS:UPRESA 6020, Faculté de Médecine,
Université de la Méditerranée, 27, Boulevard Jean
Moulin, 13385 Marseille cedex 05, France. Phone: (33) 04 91 38 55 17. Fax: (33) 04 91 83 03 90. E-mail:
DidierRaoult{at}medecine.univ.mrs.fr.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/National Institutes of Health.
1993.
Biosafety in microbiological and biomedical laboratories.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Ga.
|
| 2.
|
Hornick, R. B.
1994.
Tularemia, p. 1296-1301.
In
P. D. Hoeprich, M. C. Jordan, and A. R. Ronald (ed.), Infectious diseases. J. B. Lippincott Company, Philadelphia, Pa.
|
| 3.
|
Junhui, Z.,
Y. Ruifu,
L. Jianchun,
Z. Songle,
C. Meiling,
C. Fengxiang, and C. Hong.
1996.
Detection of Francisella tularensis by the polymerase chain reaction.
J. Med. Microbiol.
45:477-482[Abstract].
|
| 4.
|
Marrero, M., and D. Raoult.
1989.
Centrifugation-shell vial technique for rapid detection of Mediterranean spotted fever rickettsia in blood culture.
Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg.
40:197-199.
|
| 5.
|
Musso, D., and D. Raoult.
1995.
Coxiella burnetii blood cultures from acute and chronic Q-fever patients.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
33:3129-3132[Abstract].
|
| 6.
|
Penn, R. L.
1995.
Francisella tularensis (tularemia), p. 2061-2068.
In
G. L. Mandell, J. E. Bennett, and R. Dolin (ed.), Principles and practice of infectious diseases, 4th ed. Churchill Livingstone, New York, N.Y.
|
| 7.
|
Raoult, D.,
J. C. Laurent, and M. Mutillod.
1994.
Monoclonal antibodies to Coxiella burnetii for antigenic detection in cell cultures and in paraffin embedded tissues.
Am. J. Clin. Pathol.
101:318-320[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Regnery, R. L.,
C. L. Spruill, and B. D. Plikaytis.
1991.
Genotypic identification of rickettsiae and estimation of intraspecies sequence divergence for portions of two rickettsial genes.
J. Bacteriol.
173:1576-1589[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Roux, V., and D. Raoult.
1995.
Phylogenetic analysis of the genus Rickettsia by 16S rDNA sequencing.
Res. Microbiol.
146:385-396[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Sato, T.,
H. Fujita,
Y. Ohara, and M. Homma.
1990.
Microagglutination test for early and specific serodiagnosis of tularemia.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
28:2372-2374[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Sjöstedt, A.,
U. Eriksson,
L. Berglund, and A. Tärnvik.
1997.
Detection of Francisella tularensis in ulcers of patients with tularemia by PCR.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
35:1045-1048[Abstract].
|
| 12.
|
Viljanen, M. K.,
T. Nurmi, and A. Salminen.
1983.
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with bacterial sonicate antigen for IgM, IgA, and IgG antibodies to Francisella tularensis: comparison with bacterial agglutination test and ELISA with lipopolysaccharide antigen.
J. Infect. Dis.
148:715-720[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Weisburg, W. G.,
S. M. Barns,
D. A. Palletier, and D. J. Lane.
1991.
16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study.
J. Bacteriol.
173:697-703[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, September 1998, p. 2782-2783, Vol. 36, No. 9
0095-1137/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.