Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, January 1999, p. 14-17, Vol. 37, No. 1
Laboratory of Medical
Microbiology1 and
Department of
Paediatrics,
Received 29 June 1998/Returned for modification 20 August
1998/Accepted 13 October 1998
For diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection we
compared two rapid tests, PCR and the immunoglobulin M
immunofluorescence assay (IgM IFA), with culture and the complement
fixation test (CFT), in a prospective study among 92 children with
respiratory tract infection and 74 controls. Based on positivity of
culture and/or CFT as the diagnostic criterion, nine patients (10%)
were diagnosed with M. pneumoniae infection. All patients
positive by culture were also positive by PCR. In all controls
cultures, PCRs, and serological assays were negative, except in one
with a positive IgM IFA. The IgM IFA had a low positive predictive value of 50%. Only a combination of PCR (seven patients) and CFT (seven patients) allowed diagnosis of all cases.
Mycoplasma pneumoniae
causes 15 to 20% of community-acquired pneumonia (6) in
older children and adults and a variety of respiratory tract infections
in younger children. Diagnosis of M. pneumoniae infection
relies mainly on laboratory tests. Culturing M. pneumoniae
from clinical specimens is laborious and may take up to 5 weeks. The
sensitivity of culture is lower than that of serological assays
(9). The complement fixation test (CFT) is the most widely
used serological assay. The sensitivity of this assay depends on
whether the first serum sample is collected early or late after the
onset of illness and on the availability of paired sera collected with
an interval of 2 to 3 weeks. In order to diagnose M. pneumoniae infection more rapidly, PCR and immunoglobulin M (IgM)
assays which may allow diagnosis in 1 or 2 days have been developed.
Although IgM assays are more sensitive than CFT, the IgM response may
be nonspecific (12) or absent, particularly in adults
(17). PCR does not have these disadvantages, but it carries
the risk of detecting healthy carriers of M. pneumoniae.
In various studies PCR has been compared to serological diagnosis of
M. pneumoniae infection. However, the serological diagnosis was based on the IgM response (1, 13) and/or on CFT results from a single serum sample (15, 19). In another study
applying PCR for diagnosis of M. pneumoniae infection,
serological assays were not used at all (8). None of the
studies prospectively compared culture and CFT with rapid tests like
PCR and IgM assays, including controls at the same time. We therefore
designed a 15-month prospective study among children with respiratory
tract infection and age-matched controls. We collected throat swab
samples to detect the presence of M. pneumoniae by culture
or its DNA by PCR, and we analyzed sera by CFT and an IgM
immunofluorescence assay (IFA).
(This study was presented in part at the International Organization for
Mycoplasmology Congress, 14 to 19 July 1996, Orlando, Fla.
[5a].)
This study was approved by the Medical Ethical Committee of the
investigating institute, the Academic Medical Center in Amsterdam (AMC). Written informed consent was obtained from patients and controls.
Patients and controls.
For a 15-month period, June 1994 through October 1995, children with signs of community-acquired
respiratory tract infection admitted to the Outpatient Department of
Pediatrics at the AMC and Boven-IJ Hospital were eligible for
inclusion. Entry criteria were (i) age between 0.5 and 18 years, (ii) a
nonproductive cough associated with (a) signs of upper or lower
respiratory tract infection for at least 3 days or (b) a sore throat or
chest pain, and (iii) a body temperature of >37.5°C. (iv)
Additionally, at least one of the following signs had to be present:
malaise, muscle pain, or headache. Patients treated with non- Serology for M. pneumoniae.
An IFA detecting M. pneumoniae IgM antibodies (Zeus Inc., Raritan, N.J.) was performed
on a 20-fold-diluted first serum sample from which IgG had been removed
with rheumatoid factor absorbent (Behring, Marburg, Germany). Slides
were interpreted according to the manufacturer's instructions. Sera
were analyzed by CFT using a commercially available M. pneumoniae antigen (Virion, Rüschlikon, Switzerland). A
fourfold titer rise for paired sera or a single titer of 1: PCR and culture for M. pneumoniae.
The throat swabs
were twirled in the transport medium, and aliquots were used for
culture and PCR. The remainder was stored at
0095-1137/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Comparison of PCR, Culture, and Serological Tests
for Diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae Respiratory Tract
Infection in Children
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References
-lactam
antibiotics in the preceding 14 days were excluded. At least one blood
sample was collected for serological testing. A cotton-tipped throat swab was used to obtain material from the space between the palatine arches for PCR and culture of M. pneumoniae. The throat swab
was placed into 2 ml of transport medium (PPLO broth [Difco, Detroit, Mich.], yeast extract [10%], unheated horse serum [20%], glucose [0.5%], phenol red [0.002%], and penicillin [1,000 U/ml]) and processed at the laboratory on the day of collection.
-lactams. From
controls a throat swab was obtained and processed for PCR and culture.
Blood was collected only if the disease justified the sampling of
blood. Sera obtained at the time of the throat swab sampling were used
for serological testing.
128 was
regarded as positive.
70°C. For PCR, 0.1 ml
of throat specimen was subjected to proteinase K lysis and processed
for PCR with P1 gene-specific primers (8). An amplification
control (AC) was added to test the amplifiability of M. pneumoniae DNA in the samples (18). When inhibition
occurred, a 1/10 dilution of the lysate was retested. Positive samples
were reanalyzed for confirmation by a nested PCR (5). For
culture, 50 µl of throat specimen was plated on SP4 agar
(16), supplemented with amphotericin B (5 µg/ml) and colistin (500 U/ml) but without thallium acetate (SP4-AC), and on
Chanock and Herderschêe agar. Two hundred fifty microliters was
cultured in 2 ml of SP4-AC broth and Chanock broth. Agars and broths
were incubated at 36°C in 5% CO2. Broths were
subcultured on agar upon color change. The identity of putative
M. pneumoniae colonies was verified by indirect
immunofluorescence of unfixed colonies and by nested PCR
(5).
Interpretation. Patients with a positive culture and/or CFT were considered to have an M. pneumoniae infection.
Additional microbiological testing. On the request of the pediatrician, standard microbiological procedures were performed on sera and throat swabs.
Clinical data. Clinical data from patients were collected by the pediatrician using a questionnaire. Laboratory findings were extracted from the hospital information system.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ninety-two patients and 74 controls were included in the study. From all patients and from 32 controls at least one serum sample was collected. The IgM IFA on the first serum sample was positive for 14 patients (15%) (Table 1) and for one control. From all subjects testing positive in the IgM IFA and from 51 IgM IFA-negative patients a second serum sample was collected 2 to 3 weeks after the first. CFT was positive for seven patients (8%). CFT on paired sera from the IgM IFA-positive control was negative.
|
PCR for M. pneumoniae was positive for seven patients (8%). PCR on follow-up throat samples obtained from four of them (patients 1, 3, 7, and 8 in Table 1) 4 to 12 weeks after the first sample was negative. Throat samples from the 74 controls were PCR negative. Inhibition of PCR was observed in 33 samples (20%), equally distributed among samples obtained from patients and controls. Diluting the lysates 10-fold before PCR resolved this inhibition in all cases.
M. pneumoniae was cultured from throat samples from six patients (7%). These samples were also PCR positive. All controls were culture negative. Seventeen throat samples (16 from patients and 1 from a control) were subjected to PCR for M. pneumoniae at the SSI. PCR results at the AMC and the SSI were concordant (Table 1).
Nine (10%) of the 92 patients met the diagnostic criteria for M. pneumoniae infection (patients 1 to 9 in Table 1). Four of them were diagnosed by culture and CFT, two were diagnosed by culture only, and three were diagnosed by CFT only. PCR was positive for all culture-positive patients and one culture-negative patient with a positive CFT. For seven additional patients the IgM IFA was positive whereas all other tests were negative.
Routine microbiological investigations revealed etiologic agents other than M. pneumoniae in 23 patients (25%), namely, Haemophilus influenzae (n = 4), Moraxella (Branhamella) catarrhalis (n = 1), Bordetella pertussis(n = 1), Chlamydia species (n = 3), respiratory syncytial virus (n = 4), coxsackie B virus (n = 3), adenovirus (n = 3), parainfluenza virus (n = 2), influenza B virus (n = 1), and Epstein-Barr virus (n = 1). In these patients, all of the four methods performed for diagnosis of M. pneumoniae infection were negative.
Clinical data were obtained from 89 patients (97%) (Table 2). Fifty-four patients (61%) met the criteria for lower respiratory tract infection (rales and wheezes with or without an abnormal chest radiograph). M. pneumoniae was significantly more often the cause of these severe infections (8 of 54 patients, 15%) than of upper respiratory tract infections (1 of 35 patients, 3%) (P < 0.001). Only the absence of coryza significantly correlated with M. pneumoniae infection (P < 0.001) (Fisher's exact test).
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recently much emphasis has been placed on rapid diagnosis of M. pneumoniae infection by PCR (1, 8, 13, 15, 19) and IgM assays (2). We prospectively studied 92 children with community-acquired respiratory infections and 74 controls to compare diagnosis of M. pneumoniae infection by two rapid tests, PCR and IgM IFA, with diagnosis by the more traditional methods of culture and CFT. Our criteria for diagnosis of M. pneumoniae infection were a positive culture and/or positive CFT. According to these criteria, nine patients (10%) had an M. pneumoniae infection (Table 1).
Throat specimens from seven of the nine patients (78%) diagnosed with M. pneumoniae infection were PCR positive. Thus, the sensitivity of the PCR was 78%; the specificity and positive predictive value were 100%. The sensitivity of the PCR was relatively low because two CFT-positive patients were negative by PCR. This may have been caused by sampling errors. Another possibility is that the M. pneumoniae load was below the detection level of both PCRs or that M. pneumoniae already had disappeared from the throat at the time of sampling.
Conversely, PCR was positive for two other patients who had an M. pneumoniae infection based on a positive culture, whereas the CFT was negative. The negative CFT for these patients may be due to impaired immune responses (1, 13). All culture-positive patients were also positive by PCR. The strong positive predictive value indicates that PCR positivity can be added to the criteria for diagnosis of M. pneumoniae infection and can even replace culture positivity.
Sera analyzed by IgM IFA were positive in 14 patients (Table 1). The sensitivities of IgM IFA and of PCR were equal (78%). The specificity of IgM IFA was low (92%), and its positive predictive value was only 50%. One control was also positive by IgM IFA, whereas all other tests were negative. Even when single CFT titers of 64 were regarded as positive (14), IgM IFA still had a low positive predictive value (57%). We therefore will not add a positive IgM IFA to our criteria and conclude that the IgM IFA should not be used as the single assay to diagnose M. pneumoniae infection (4).
Although the number of M. pneumoniae-positive patients in our study was relatively small, PCR and CFT were complementary in four of the nine patients (44%) diagnosed. If either PCR or CFT had been used as the single test, diagnosis would not have been established in two patients (22%) with M. pneumoniae infection. We therefore use PCR for rapid diagnosis of M. pneumoniae infection. In case of a negative PCR, a CFT on paired sera is necessary to either confirm or reject the diagnosis of M. pneumoniae infection. Our findings are concurrent with those in the study of Abele-Horn et al. (1). However, for serological diagnosis they applied a microparticle agglutination test and added immunoblotting in unclear cases. As the microparticle agglutination assay exclusively detects IgM antibody (3) and immunoblotting is not widely available, we prefer the use of CFT on paired sera.
Several authors have reported carriage of M. pneumoniae after symptomatic infection (7) or after treatment (11). We did not find indications for carriership. Follow-up throat swabs from four PCR-positive patients who had been treated with antibiotics were PCR negative, suggesting eradication of M. pneumoniae. In addition, all controls were M. pneumoniae PCR negative.
Foy et al. (6) reported several clinical parameters which positively and negatively correlated with M. pneumoniae infection. In our study the absence of coryza was the only parameter that correlated with an M. pneumoniae infection (P < 0.001) (Table 2). This finding shows the difficulty in discriminating M. pneumoniae from other (viral) pathogens causing respiratory tract infection on clinical parameters only and emphasizes the need for laboratory confirmation.
In conclusion, the rapid IgM IFA has a low positive predictive value, and PCR on throat swab samples has a relatively low sensitivity. Therefore, PCR should be combined with CFT to allow both fast and reliable diagnosis of M. pneumoniae infection.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Present address: Diagnostic Laboratory for Infectious Diseases and Perinatal Screening, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, P.O. Box 1, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands. Phone: 31-30-2743705. Fax: 31-30-2744449. E-mail: Wendelien.Dorigo{at}rivm.nl.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Abele-Horn, M.,
U. Busch,
H. Nitschko,
E. Jacobs,
R. Bax,
F. Pfaff,
B. Schaffer, and J. Heeseman.
1998.
Molecular approaches to diagnosis of pulmonary diseases due to Mycoplasma pneumoniae.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
36:548-551 |
| 2. | Alexander, T. S., L. D. Gray, J. A. Kraft, D. S. LeLand, M. T. Nikaido, and D. H. Willis. 1996. Performance of Meridian ImmunoCard Mycoplasma test in a multicenter clinical trial. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:1180-1183[Abstract]. |
| 3. |
Barker, C. E.,
M. Sillis, and T. G. Wreghitt.
1990.
Evaluation of Serodia Myco II particle agglutination test for detecting Mycoplasma pneumoniae antibody: comparison with µ-capture ELISA and indirect immunofluorescence.
J. Clin. Pathol.
43:163-165 |
| 4. | Dorigo-Zetsma, J. W., P. M. E. Wertheim-van Dillen, and L. Spanjaard. 1996. Performance of Meridian ImmunoCard Mycoplasma Test in a multicenter clinical trial. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:3249-3250[Medline]. (Letter.) |
| 5. | Dorigo-Zetsma, J. W., S. A. J. Zaat, D. Ursi, and J. Dankert. 1994. Quantification of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in simulated clinical specimens using a nested polymerase chain reaction, p. 496. In Abstracts of the International Congress of the International Organization for Mycoplasmology, vol. 3. International Organization for Mycoplasmology, Bordeaux, France. |
| 5a. | Dorigo-Zetsma, J. W., et al. 1996. Abstracts of the International Organization for Mycoplasmatology, vol. 4. , p. 308. International Organization for Mycoplasmatology, Orlando, Fla. |
| 6. | Foy, H. M., G. E. Kenny, R. McMahan, A. M. Mansy, and J. T. Grayston. 1970. Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in an urban area. JAMA 214:1666-1672[Medline]. |
| 7. | Foy, H. M. 1993. Infections caused by Mycoplasma pneumoniae and possible carrier state in different populations of patients. Clin. Infect. Dis. 17(Suppl. 1):S37-S46. |
| 8. | Ieven, M., D. Ursi, H. van Bever, W. Quint, H. M. G. Niesters, and H. Goossens. 1996. The detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae by two polymerase chain reactions and its role in acute respiratory tract infections in paediatric patients. J. Infect. Dis. 173:1445-1452[Medline]. |
| 9. | Jacobs, E. 1993. Serological diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections: a critical review of current procedures. Clin. Infect. Dis. 17(Suppl. 1):S79-S82. |
| 10. | Jensen, J. S., J. Sondergard Andersen, S. A. Uldum, and K. Lind. 1989. Detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in simulated clinical samples by polymerase chain reaction. APMIS 97:1046-1048[Medline]. |
| 11. | Kleemola, S. R. M., J. E. Karjalainen, and R. K. H. Raty. 1990. Rapid diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection: clinical evaluation of a commercial probe test. J. Infect. Dis. 162:70-75[Medline]. |
| 12. | Sillis, M. 1993. Modern methods for diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia. Rev. Med. Microbiol. 4:24-31. |
| 13. |
Skakni, L.,
A. Sardet,
J. Just,
J. Landman-Parker,
J. Costil,
N. Moniot-Vile,
F. Bricout, and A. Garbarg-Chenon.
1992.
Detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in clinical samples from pediatric patients by polymerase chain reaction.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
30:2638-2643 |
| 14. | Taylor-Robinson, D. 1995. Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma, p. 652-662. In P. R. Murray, E. J. Baron, M. A. Pfaller, F. C. Tenover, and Y. H. Yolken (ed.), Manual of clinical microbiology, 6th ed. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C. |
| 15. |
Tjhie, J. H. T.,
F. J. M. van Kuppeveld,
R. Roosendaal,
W. J. G. Melchers,
R. Gordijn,
D. M. MacLaren,
J. M. M. Walboomers,
C. J. L. M. Meijer, and A. J. C. van den Brule.
1994.
Direct PCR enables detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in patients with respiratory tract infections.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
32:11-16 |
| 16. | Tully, J. G., D. L. Rose, R. F. Whitcomb, and R. P. Wenzel. 1979. Enhanced isolation of Mycoplasma pneumoniae from throatwashings with a newly modified culture medium. J. Infect. Dis. 139:478-482[Medline]. |
| 17. |
Uldum, S. A.,
J. S. Jensen,
J. Sondergard-Andersen, and K. Lind.
1992.
Enzyme immunoassay for detection of immunoglobulin M (IgM) and IgG antibodies to Mycoplasma pneumoniae.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
30:1198-1204 |
| 18. | Ursi, J. P., D. Ursi, M. Ieven, and S. R. Pattyn. 1992. Utility of an internal control for the polymerase chain reaction. Application to detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in clinical specimens. APMIS 100:635-639[Medline]. |
| 19. | Van Kuppeveld, F. J., K. E. Johansson, J. M. Galama, J. Kissing, G. Bölske, E. Hjelm, J. T. van der Logt, and W. J. Melchers. 1994. 16S rRNA based polymerase chain reaction compared with culture and serological methods for diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 13:401-405[Medline]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. |
|---|---|
| Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |
|---|