Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, January 1999, p. 255-257, Vol. 37, No. 1
Department of Microbiology, Basildon
Hospital, Nethermayne, Basildon, Essex SS16 5NL, United Kingdom
Received 31 July 1998/Returned for modification 3 September
1998/Accepted 15 October 1998
The latex agglutination kits that are widely used for grouping of
beta-hemolytic streptococci in clinical laboratories use liquid latex
suspensions. The Oxoid Dryspot kit (Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, Hampshire,
United Kingdom) uses predispensed latex dried onto reaction cards or
cardboard strips. All streptococci of groups A (85 strains), B (87 strains), C (30 strains), D (38 strains), F (23 strains), and G (65 strains) were correctly grouped by using these reagents. The Oxoid
Dryspot Streptococcal Grouping kit is a reliable method for
grouping of the beta-hemolytic streptococci encountered in clinical laboratories.
Latex agglutination or
coagglutination methods have largely superseded precipitation methods
for the determination of the Lancefield group of beta-hemolytic
streptococci (BHS) isolated from clinical material (7).
Latex agglutination kits are available for the detection of group A, B,
C, D, F, and G streptococcus antigens (2, 5). In these kits,
the latex is a liquid suspension. The latex in Oxoid Dryspot
Streptococcal Grouping kits (Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, Hampshire, United
Kingdom) has a novel format. It is predried onto reaction cards or
strips. This study assessed the ability of the Dryspot reagents to
group BHS of groups A, B, C, D, F, and G. The strains of BHS used in
the study were also tested with Oxoid streptococcal grouping reagents
and Streptex (Murex, Dartford, Kent, United Kingdom), which both use
conventional liquid latex suspensions.
Bacterial strains.
Altogether, 230 strains were used in the
first investigation and 202 were used in the second investigation. A
total of 49 strains from the culture collection of Basildon Hospital
and the National Collection of Type Cultures (NCTC) were used in both investigations. Strains of BHS isolated and identified in the Department of Microbiology, Basildon Hospital, from clinical material submitted for examination during this study were also used in both
investigations. In the first investigation, 181 clinical isolates were
tested. In the second investigation, 153 clinical isolates were tested;
60 of these had also been tested in the first investigation. The
strains from the culture collections consisted of groups A (three
Streptococcus pyogenes strains [including NCTC 8198], two
S. anginosus strains, and one S. constellatus strain), B (four S. agalactiae
strains [including NCTC 8181]), C (two S. anginosus
strains, one S. dysgalactiae strain [NCTC 4335],
three S. equi strains [including NCTC 9682], two
S. equisimilis strains, and two S. zooepidemicus strains [including NCTC 6176]), D (one
S. bovis strain and four Enterococcus
faecalis strains, three of which had both D and G antigens), F
(seven S. constellatus strains and five
Streptococcus sp. strains [including NCTC 5389]), and G
(two S. anginosus strains [including NCTC 10713],
three S. canis strains [including NCTC 12191], and
two large-colony group G Streptococcus sp. strains), one
Streptococcus sp. group L strain, and four strains of
Listeria monocytogenes. The strains from the culture
collection of Basildon Hospital have been previously characterized
(4-6). The clinical strains were confirmed as
catalase-negative, gram-positive cocci, and their Lancefield groups
were determined with Oxoid latex streptococcal grouping reagents, but
the results were not revealed to me until the end of the investigation.
0095-1137/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Evaluation of the Oxoid Dryspot Streptococcal
Grouping Kit for Grouping Beta-Hemolytic Streptococci
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
![]()
TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
Grouping methods. Two formats of the Oxoid Dryspot latex reagents were evaluated, the card format and the cardboard strip format. In the card format, four spots of streptococcal grouping latex had been dried onto an area of a reaction card, one area each for groups A, B, C, D, F, and G. In the strip format, four spots of latex had been dried onto a 0.5-cm2 area at the end of a strip (45 by 12 mm) of stiff paper. The strips were identified according to the Lancefield group they were intended to react with, and there were separate strips for each of groups A, B, C, D, F, and G. The cards and strips were stored at room temperature in resealable foil envelopes containing a sachet of silica gel. The strips were packaged as one group per foil envelope. All other reagents were stored at 4°C and brought to room temperature prior to use.
The study was conducted in two parts. In the first investigation, strains were tested with the Dryspot card format. In the second investigation, strains were tested with the Dryspot strip format. In both investigations, enzyme and nitrous acid extracts of the strains were tested. All strains were also tested with the Oxoid Streptococcal Grouping kit and Streptex by using both the enzyme and nitrous acid extracts. The tests were performed in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions outlined below.Oxoid Dryspot card format. Strains were extracted with Oxoid extraction enzyme or Oxoid nitrous acid reagents as described below. One drop, approximately 50 µl, of extract was added to each of the test areas on the Dryspot test card provided. This was carefully mixed into the dry spots of latex in each oval area until the latex was resuspended. A separate mixing stick was used for each latex test spot.
Oxoid Dryspot strip format. Strains were extracted with Oxoid streptococcal grouping enzyme or Oxoid nitrous acid reagents as described below. One drop, approximately 50 µl, of extract was added to each of the test areas on the reaction card provided. The area containing the dried latex was brought into contact with the extract, and the strip was pushed down so that it folded at the embossed hinge. The surface of the strip was then rotated in contact with the streptococcal extract in order to rehydrate and release the latex and mix it with the extract.
Oxoid Streptococcal Grouping kits. (i) Enzyme extraction. A 0.4-ml volume of extraction enzyme was added to a polystyrene tube (75 by 10 mm), and a culture quantity equivalent to two to five large colonies was suspended in the mixture by using a 1-µl disposable loop. The mixture was incubated at 37°C for 10 min.
(ii) Nitrous acid extraction. Three drops of extraction reagent 1 and 3 drops of extraction reagent 2 were added to a polystyrene tube (75 by 10 mm), and a culture quantity equivalent to two to five large colonies was suspended in the mixture by using a 1-µl disposable loop. Three drops of extraction reagent 3 were added to the suspension, and the contents were mixed.
Streptex. (i) Enzyme extraction. A 0.4-ml volume of extraction enzyme was added to a polystyrene tube (75 by 10 mm), and a culture quantity equivalent to two to five large colonies was suspended in the mixture by using a 1-µl disposable loop. The mixture was incubated at 37°C for 10 min.
(ii) Nitrous acid extraction. One volume of extraction reagent 1 was added to the reaction tube provided, and a culture quantity sufficient to cover the blunt end of the wooden stick provided in the kit was added to the tube and mixed with the contents. The stick was left in the reaction tube for 1 min and then 1 volume of extraction reagent 2 was added to the tube.
For each of the Oxoid and Streptex methods, 1 drop of each latex reagent was added to the appropriate area on a reaction card, 1 drop, approximately 50 µl, of the streptococcal extract was added to each area, and the contents were mixed with a separate stick until a smooth suspension was obtained. To ensure comparability, the same culture plate was used for each of the grouping methods used, as appropriate for each part of the study. The positive control material provided in each kit was used to check the correct functioning of each kit. For all of the methods used in this study, enzyme extracts were reacted with latexes for groups A, B, C, D, F, and G and with nitrous acid extract latexes for groups A, B, C, F, and G. The reaction cards were rocked gently for up to 1 min. The timing of the reactions commenced after the mixing of all of the latexes had been completed, and the time at which a positive reaction occurred was recorded by rounding up to the nearest 5 s. A time of 0 s was recorded if strong agglutination was visible before the reaction card was rocked. Reactions were read without magnification. The strength of the positive reactions was graded as 4+ (complete agglutination of the latex with a clear background), 3+ (extensive agglutination with a mostly clear background), 2+ (moderate agglutination with a visible decrease in background density), or 1+ (fine agglutination with an essentially unchanged background). A negative reaction was taken as one where there was no agglutination of the latex visible to the unaided eye. Strains which produced anomalous reactions were retested with all of the kits from fresh subcultures.Results and discussion. The results obtained with both of the Dryspot methods were identical to those obtained with the liquid latex methods for the equivalent strains (Table 1). The clinical strains tested in both investigations were placed in the same group in both studies, and the results for the clinical strains were identical to those obtained by the routine diagnostic laboratory. The collection strains were correctly grouped by all of the methods used. In the first investigation, 60 strains were placed in group A when enzyme extracts were tested and 59 were placed in group A when nitrous acid extracts were tested; 53 of these strains were clinical isolates. There were 54 group B (50 clinical), 25 group C (15 clinical), 28 group D (23 clinical), 19 group F (7 clinical), and 40 group G (33 clinical) strains. In the second investigation, 43 strains were identified as members of group A when enzyme extracts were tested and 42 were placed in group A when nitrous acid extracts were tested; 40 of these strains were clinical isolates, including 10 which had been tested in the first study. There were 47 group B (43 clinical, including 10 from the first study), 25 group C (15 clinical, including 10 from the first study), 25 group D (20 clinical, including 10 from the first study), 16 group F (4 clinical), and 42 group G (35 clinical, including 10 from the first study) strains.
|
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
I am grateful to Oxoid for providing the material used in this study; the members of the Department of Microbiology, Basildon Hospital, who provided the clinical strains used in the study; and W. M. J. Hill for commenting on the manuscript.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Mailing address: Department of Microbiology, Basildon Hospital, Nethermayne, Basildon, Essex SS16 5NL, United Kingdom. Phone: 01268 593555. Fax: 01268 593020. E-mail: dpetts{at}baspathology.demon.co.uk.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Colman, G., A. Efstratiou, and D. Morrison. 1992. Streptococci and related organisms, p. 227. In R. G. Board, D. Jones, and F. A. Skinner (ed.), Identification methods in applied and environmental microbiology. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, United Kingdom. |
| 2. |
Daly, J. A., and K. C. Seskin.
1988.
Evaluation of rapid, commercial latex techniques for serogrouping beta-hemolytic streptococci.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
26:2429-2431 |
| 3. |
Petts, D. N.
1984.
Colistin-oxolinic acid-blood agar: a new selective medium for the isolation of streptococci.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
19:4-7 |
| 4. | Petts, D. N. 1992. Ph.D. thesis. University of London, London, United Kingdom. |
| 5. | Petts, D. N. 1995. Evaluation of a modified nitrous acid extraction latex agglutination kit for grouping beta-hemolytic streptococci and enterococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:1016-1018[Abstract]. |
| 6. | Petts, D. N., A. Lane, P. Kennedy, S. G. Hadfield, and M. B. McIllmurray. 1988. Direct detection of group A, C, and G streptococci in clinical specimens by a trivalent colour test. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 7:34-39[Medline]. |
| 7. | Schieven, B. C., and Z. Hussein. 1991. Evaluation of a modified extraction procedure for Streptex, a rapid latex test kit for streptococcal grouping. Can. J. Med. Technol. 54:170-172. |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. |
|---|---|
| Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |
|---|