Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, October 1999, p. 3370-3373, Vol. 37, No. 10
National Food Administration,
Received 1 February 1999/Returned for modification 23 March
1999/Accepted 5 July 1999
A sensitive PCR assay that detects the thermophilic campylobacters
C. jejuni, C. coli, C. lari, and
C. upsaliensis is reported. Furthermore, by digestion of
the PCR products with two restriction enzymes, species differentiation
was demonstrated. Thus, the present method has the potential to be used
for both detection and identification of thermophilic
Campylobacter species.
The rate of Campylobacter
infections has been increasing, with the number of cases often
exceeding those of Salmonella and Shigella
(14, 16). The clinically most important campylobacters are the members of the thermophilic group, C. jejuni,
C. coli, C. lari, and C. upsaliensis,
with C. jejuni responsible for the majority of human cases
(1). The true incidences, however, might be underestimated,
since most cultivation methods are designed for C. jejuni
alone and therefore may not be optimal for the other species
(3). Furthermore, in many clinical laboratories, typing is
only done to the genus level, since species determination is cumbersome
and sometimes gives incorrect or intermediate results.
Thus, there is a great need for simple methods for detection and
reliable differentiation of the thermophilic Campylobacter species. Indeed, a number of genetically based detection and typing methods have been developed for Campylobacter species in
food, clinical, and environmental samples (4-6, 9, 12, 13, 17, 22, 23). However, the majority of these methods suffer from drawbacks like the need for multiple PCRs or restriction enzymes or the
requirement of a hybridization step with species-specific probes after
the PCR.
This study describes a sensitive and simple method for both the
detection and differentiation of thermophilic campylobacters. Detection is achieved by the amplification of 491 bp of a highly polymorphic part of the 23S rRNA gene, and further species
differentiation is accomplished by digestion of the PCR product by two
restriction enzymes, AluI and Tsp509I, resulting
in specific restriction fragments for each species.
The bacterial strains used in this study are listed in Table
1. The
bacteria were cultured aerobically or in a microaerophilic atmosphere
on blood agar at 37 or 42°C.
Chromosomal DNA was prepared either by simply breaking the bacterial
cells with heat or by the method of Pitcher et al. (15). The
PCR mixtures contained a 0.25 µM concentration of each
oligonucleotide (Scandinavian Gene Synthesis, Köping, Sweden), 50 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3 at room temperature), 1.5 mM
MgCl2, a 0.1 mM concentration of each deoxynucleotide, and
0.02 U of AmpliTaq Gold (PE Applied Biosystems, Branchburg, N.J.) per
µl. The temperature cycling was performed on a PTC-200 DNA engine (MJ
Research, Watertown, Mass.) at 94°C for 1 min, 56°C for 1 min, and
72°C for 1 min for 45 cycles, followed by a final extension at 72°C
for 5 min. The temperature protocol was preceded by a 12-min incubation
at 94°C in order to activate the AmpliTaq Gold polymerase. The PCR
products were visualized by 3% agarose gel electrophoresis. To
differentiate between species, 10-µl samples were removed from
PCR-positive mixtures and digested in two separate reaction tubes for
1 h with either 0.5 U of AluI at 37°C or 0.5 U of
Tsp509I at 65°C. PCR products of type strains with known
banding patterns were digested and analyzed in parallel with unknown
samples in order to ensure cleavage activity. Banding patterns, easy to
interpret, were reproducibly obtained and visualized by gel
electrophoresis (Fig. 1).
0095-1137/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Specific PCR Identification and Differentiation of the
Thermophilic Campylobacters, Campylobacter jejuni, C. coli, C. lari, and C. upsaliensis
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
![]()
TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
TABLE 1.
Bacterial strains used in this study

View larger version (38K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 1.
Restriction fragments generated by digestion with
AluI and Tsp509I of PCR products of the
thermophilic campylobacters. Lanes: 1, C. jejuni CCUG 11284;
2, C. lari CCUG 23947; 3, C. coli CCUG 11283; 4, C. upsaliensis C434 (from a dog); 5, C. upsaliensis CCUG 14913. Lanes M contain a 100-bp ladder.
The most variable part of the 23S rRNA gene, located between helices 43 and 69 (7), of different Campylobacter species has been extensively sequenced and used as a target for
species-specific PCR methods (4, 8). One primer pair, THERM1
and THERM2, has been shown to specifically detect the
thermophilic Campylobacter species (4). In
the present study, THERM1 was used together with a new primer, THERM4
(5'-CTTCGCTAATGCTAACCC-3'). THERM4 was constructed to
perfectly match the sequences of the thermophilic species by using
published DNA sequences (Table 2). The
primer pair THERM1 and THERM4 demonstrated high specificity, giving a PCR product of the correct size for all strains of the thermophilic group, but not for other Campylobacter species or other
bacteria (Table 1). One isolate of Campylobacter mucosalis,
though, gave a faint band of the correct size. This band, however,
disappeared when the MgCl2 concentration was lowered to 0.5 mM. Nevertheless, the higher MgCl2 concentration was
used throughout the study, since amplification of the
C. mucosalis isolate resulted in a barely visible
band on the gel and the restriction fragments of this PCR product
generated unique banding patterns clearly distinguishable from those of
the target species.
|
The PCR assay detected as few as one to five cells or chromosomes of C. jejuni SLV-428. The number of chromosomes was calculated according to the chromosomal size estimated by Karlyshev et al. (10). The detection of such a low number of cells is probably enhanced by the occurrence of three copies of the 23S rRNA genes on the chromosome (18).
Restriction enzymes specifically recognizing polymorphic areas within the amplified segment were identified with the WWWtacg version 2.38 software (Harry Mangalam, University of California, Irvine). Digestion with AluI gave unique combinations of fragments for C. jejuni and C. lari, respectively (Fig. 1). Isolates of C. upsaliensis showed either of two AluI banding patterns, one of which was the same as that for C. coli (Fig. 1). The two different AluI patterns of C. upsaliensis strains were expected, since both sequence variants have been published (Table 2). Differentiation between C. coli and C. upsaliensis was achieved by using a second enzyme, Tsp509I, which resulted in discriminatory banding patterns (Fig. 1). There was a discrepancy between the expected identity and the result of the PCR assay in two cases of 118 thermophilic campylobacters tested (Table 1). One human isolate previously identified as C. jejuni was typed as C. coli according to the restriction banding patterns. This isolate was positive for hippurate hydrolysis and was accordingly PCR positive for the hippuricase gene only present in this species (12). Thus, the PCR assay failed to classify this isolate correctly. The second isolate, a veterinary strain previously typed as C. coli, was according to the PCR assay C. jejuni. The PCR typing result was supported by a positive amplification of the hippuricase gene. However, the DNA fragment generated was about 300 bp shorter than expected (12). Nevertheless, all other C. coli isolates analyzed were negative for the hippuricase gene PCR, indicating that this particular isolate in fact is a C. jejuni strain with a truncated hippuricase gene, thus explaining the negative hippurate hydrolysis phenotype characteristic of strains of C. coli.
The PCR method presented in this study identifies with a single PCR low numbers of thermophilic campylobacters (1 to 5 CFU). In addition, by two simple restriction enzyme digestions performed directly in the PCR mixture, it differentiates between species within this group of bacteria. Thus, the method has the potential to be used for detection and identification of thermophilic campylobacters in complex samples, such as foods in which low numbers are present. This method also has the possibility of complementing or replacing phenotypic methods for identifying thermophilic Campylobacter species.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Christina Normark for excellent technical assistance and Bjørn-Erik Kristiansen, Telemark Biomedical Center, Skien, Norway; Per Olcén, Central Hospital of Örebro, Sweden; Ameera Gibreel, Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden; Anders Gunnarsson, National Veterinary Institute, Uppsala, Sweden; and Astrid Wage and Traute Vardund, National Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway, for supplying bacteria.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: National Food Administration, Biology Division, P.O. Box 622, SE-751 26 Uppsala, Sweden. Phone: 46 18 17 14 20. Fax: 46 18 17 14 94. E-mail: chfe{at}slv.se.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Allos, B. M., and M. J. Blaser. 1995. Campylobacter jejuni and the expanding spectrum of related infections. Clin. Infect. Dis. 20:1092-1099[Medline]. |
| 2. | Bastyns, K., S. Chapelli, P. Vandamme, H. Goossens, and R. de Wachter. 1994. Species-specific detection of campylobacteria important in veterinary medicine by PCR amplification of 23S rRNA fragments. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 17:563-568. |
| 3. | Corry, J. E., D. E. Post, P. Colin, and M. J. Laisney. 1995. Culture media for the isolation of campylobacters. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 26:43-76[Medline]. |
| 4. |
Eyers, M.,
S. Chapelle,
G. van Camp,
H. Goossens, and R. De Wachter.
1993.
Discrimination among thermophilic Campylobacter species by polymerase chain reaction amplification of 23S rRNA gene fragments.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
31:3340-3343 |
| 5. |
Giesendorf, B. A. J.,
W. G. V. Quint,
M. H. C. Henkens,
H. Stegeman,
F. A. Huf, and H. G. M. Niesters.
1992.
Rapid and sensitive detection of Campylobacter spp. in chicken products by using the polymerase chain reaction.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
58:3804-3808 |
| 6. | Gonzalez, I., K. A. Grant, P. T. Richardson, S. F. Park, and M. D. Collins. 1997. Specific identification of the enteropathogens Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli by using a PCR test based on the ceuE gene encoding a putative virulence determinant. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:759-763[Abstract]. |
| 7. | Hopfl, P., W. Ludwig, K. H. Schleifer, and N. Larsen. 1989. The 23S ribosomal RNA higher-order structure of Pseudomonas cepacia and other prokaryotes. Eur. J. Biochem. 185:355-364[Medline]. |
| 8. | Hurtado, A., and R. J. Owen. 1997. A molecular scheme based on 23S rRNA gene polymorphisms for rapid identification of Campylobacter and Arcobacter species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:2401-2404[Abstract]. |
| 9. | Jackson, C. J., A. J. Fox, and D. M. Jones. 1996. A novel polymerase chain reaction assay for the detection and speciation of thermophilic Campylobacter spp. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 81:467-473[Medline]. |
| 10. |
Karlyshev, A. V.,
J. Henderson,
J. M. Ketley, and B. W. Wren.
1998.
An improved physical and genetic map of Campylobacter jejuni NCTC 11168 (ua580).
Microbiology
144:503-508 |
| 11. | Kim, N. W., R. R. Gutell, and V. L. Chan. 1995. Complete sequences and organization of the rRNA operon from Campylobacter jejuni TGH9011 (ATCC43431). Gene 164:101-106[Medline]. |
| 12. | Linton, D., A. J. Lawson, R. J. Owen, and J. Stanley. 1997. PCR detection, identification to species level, and fingerprinting of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli direct from diarrheic samples. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:2568-2572[Abstract]. |
| 13. |
Metherell, L. A.,
J. M. J. Logan, and J. Stanley.
1999.
PCR-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection and identification of Campylobacter species: application to isolates and stool samples.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
37:433-435 |
| 14. | Philips, A. C. 1995. Incidence, epidemiology and prevention of foodborne Campylobacter species. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 6:83-86. |
| 15. | Pitcher, D. G., N. A. Saunders, and R. J. Owen. 1989. Raid extraction of bacterial genomic DNA with guanidium thiocyanate. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 8:151-156. |
| 16. | Skirrow, M. B. 1990. Campylobacter. Lancet 336:921-923[Medline]. |
| 17. | Stucki, U., J. Frey, J. Nicolet, and A. P. Burnens. 1995. Identification of Campylobacter jejuni on the basis of a species-specific gene that encodes a membrane protein. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:855-859[Abstract]. |
| 18. |
Taylor, D. E.,
M. Eaton,
W. Yan, and N. Chang.
1992.
Genome maps of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli.
J. Bacteriol.
174:2332-2337 |
| 19. |
Trust, T. J.,
S. M. Logan,
C. E. Gustafson,
P. J. Romaniuk,
N. W. Kim,
V. L. Chan,
M. A. Ragan,
P. Guerry, and R. R. Gutell.
1994.
Phylogenetic and molecular characterization of a 23S rRNA gene positions the genus Campylobacter in the epsilon subdivision of the Proteobacteria and shows that the presence of transcribed spacers is common in Campylobacter spp.
J. Bacteriol.
176:4597-4609 |
| 20. | van Camp, G., S. Chapelle, and R. de Wachter. 1993. Amplification and sequencing of variable regions in bacterial 23S ribosomal RNA genes with conserved primer sequences. Curr. Microbiol. 27:147-151[Medline]. |
| 21. | van Camp, G., Y. Van de Peer, J. M. Neefs, P. Vandamme, and R. de Wachter. 1993. Presence of internal transcribed spacers in the 16S and 23S ribosomal RNA genes of Campylobacter. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 16:361-368. |
| 22. | van Doorn, L. J., B. A. Giesendorf, R. Bax, B. A. van der Zeijst, P. Vandamme, and W. G. Quint. 1997. Molecular discrimination between Campylobacter jejuni, Campylobacter coli, Campylobacter lari and Campylobacter upsaliensis by polymerase chain reaction based on a novel putative GTPase gene. Mol. Cell. Probes 11:177-185[Medline]. |
| 23. |
Wegmüller, B.,
J. Lüthy, and U. Candrian.
1993.
Direct polymerase chain reaction detection of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli in raw milk and dairy products.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
59:2161-2165 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»