Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, December 1999, p. 4005-4011, Vol. 37, No. 12
0095-1137/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
rRNA Gene Internal Transcribed Spacer 1 and 2 Sequences of
Asexual, Anthropophilic Dermatophytes Related to
Trichophyton rubrum
R. C.
Summerbell,1,2,*
R. A.
Haugland,3
A.
Li,1 and
A. K.
Gupta4
Laboratories Branch, Ontario Ministry of
Health,1 and Department of Laboratory
Medicine and Pathobiology2 and Division
of Dermatology, Department of Medicine,4
University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, and
National Exposure Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio3
Received 18 May 1999/Returned for modification 30 June
1999/Accepted 18 August 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
The ribosomal region spanning the two internal transcribed spacer
(ITS) regions and the 5.8S ribosomal DNA region was sequenced for
asexual, anthropophilic dermatophyte species with morphological similarity to Trichophyton rubrum, as well as for
members of the three previously delineated, related major clades in the
T. mentagrophytes complex. Representative isolates of
T. raubitschekii, T. fischeri, and T. kanei were found to have ITS sequences identical to that of
T. rubrum. The ITS sequences of T. soudanense
and T. megninii differed from that of T. rubrum
by only a small number of base pairs. Their continued status as
species, however, appears to meet criteria outlined in the population
genetics-based cohesion species concept of A. R. Templeton. The
ITS sequence of T. tonsurans differed from that of the
biologically distinct T. equinum by only 1 bp, while the
ITS sequence of the recently described species T. krajdenii
had a sequence identical to that of T. mentagrophytes isolates related to the teleomorph Arthroderma
vanbreuseghemii.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Recently, the advent of molecular
biological techniques has made possible a much more detailed
examination of species structure and evolution in the
dermatophytes and dermatophytoids. Studies to date have
tended to support the existing concepts of the geophilic and zoophilic
species delineated by mating studies (8, 12, 18-20, 26).
Among the asexual anthropophilic dermatophytes a more complex picture
has emerged, and some species concepts have been called into question.
For example, a phylogenetic comparison of large-subunit ribosomal DNA
(rDNA) sequences by Leclerc et al. (20) showed that the
asexual anthropophile Microsporum audouinii could not
be distinguished from the sexual zoophile Microsporum canis
while another asexual anthropophile, Microsporum
ferrugineum, deviated minimally. The same study did not
distinguish the endemic African endothrix tinea capitis agent
Trichophyton soudanense, an asexual anthropophile,
from the morphologically distinct, cosmopolitan asexual anthropophile
T. rubrum. A phylogeny derived from the study of
mitochondrial DNA restriction types (26) failed to distinguish the distinctive aconidial, asexual agent of human favus, T. schoenleinii, from the heavily conidial
T. mentagrophytes var. quinckeanum, a
group of rodent-infecting isolates reported to be interfertile
with the teleomorph Arthroderma benhamiae (9, 31). The profound epidemiological, morphological, and
physiological differences among the species which were not
distinguished in these molecular studies indicate that the exact
techniques used, while appropriate for putatively anciently evolved
geophiles and zoophiles, may lack sufficient resolving power to discern
evolutionary trends in at least some of the more recently evolved
anthropophilic dermatophytes (29). The foregoing statement
presupposes that any specifically anthropophilic species will probably
have arisen within the relatively recent evolution of the hominid
lineage, while zoophilic species may approximately share the
evolutionary age of the broad mammalian clades with which they
primarily associate, e.g., rodents and lagomorphs for the T. mentagrophytes complex and canids and felids for M. canis.
In molecular studies of recently evolved species complexes, e.g., the
study of Lake Victoria cichlid fish (24) and the study of
fungal crop pathogens in the genus Sclerotinia
(3), it has been found that only the most highly variable
genetic regions are likely to be suitable for investigating the
delimitation and phylogeny of species. The present study therefore
investigated whether a highly variable region of fungal DNA, the
ribosomal region consisting of internal transcribed spacer sequences
(ITS) 1 and 2 and their intermediary 5.8S rDNA, exhibited adequate
variability to resolve the diversity of anthropophilic species and to
determine their phylogeny. Some reports in which sequences are given
for the ITS1 region of certain dermatophytes have recently appeared, giving broad overviews of dermatophytes (22) and of the
T. mentagrophytes complex (23). The present study
focused in greater detail on species known or thought to be related to
T. rubrum, including some zoophilic lineages that may be
ancestral to this common anthropophile. Isolates representing the
recently described segregate species T. fischeri, T. raubitschekii, and T. kanei, placed in the
T. rubrum species complex by Kane (14),
were included, including those used in preparing the original
descriptions of T. fischeri and T. raubitschekii.
In addition, in order to give a complete survey of T. rubrum-like dermatophytes and potentially aid in the development
of diagnostic probes, some isolates showing strong phenotypic
convergence with T. rubrum were included, such as a blood
red-pigmented T. mentagrophytes isolate and representative isolates of the recently described species T. krajdenii,
a T. mentagrophytes segregate that may strongly resemble
yellow variants of T. rubrum. While this study was in
review, a general overview of dermatophyte phylogeny based on a
ribosomal region strongly overlapping that used in the present study
was published (7); that study excluded many of the taxa and
variants included here.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Fungal cultures.
The origins of the Trichophyton
isolates examined are given in Table 1.
All isolates were grown at 22.5°C on Sabouraud's peptone-glucose
agar supplemented with cycloheximide (100 µg/ml), chloramphenicol
(100 µg/ml), and gentamicin (50 µg/ml).
DNA isolation.
Each isolate was inoculated into 10 ml of
Sabouraud's peptone-glucose broth and incubated at 22.5°C for 14 to
28 days. Mycelia were collected by centrifugation for 10 min at
13,000 × g and resuspended in 300 µl of a buffer
consisting of 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.2), 20 mM EDTA, and 1%
mercaptoethanol. To the mycelial suspension was added 50 to 100 mg of
glass beads. Each sample was homogenized for 5 min with a motorized
pestle (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo.). All homogenized samples
were incubated for 30 min at 60°C. Each homogenate was extracted with
an equal volume of a cloroform-isoamyl alcohol (24:1) mixture followed
by buffer-saturated phenol. The top (aqueous) phase was mixed with 2 volumes of 100% ethanol and stored at
20°C for 30 min. DNA was
precipitated by centrifugation for 15 min at 13,000 × g and 4°C. The DNA pellet was washed with 70% ethanol,
centrifuged, and then resuspended in 100 µl of Tris-EDTA buffer.
PCR.
At the Ontario Ministry of Health (OMH), PCR
amplifications were carried out in 100-µl volumes. Each reaction
mixture contained 1 µl of the prepared DNA from an isolate and 99 µl of the following PCR master mixture: 10 µl of 10× PCR buffer
(100 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.3], 500 mM KCl, 20 mM MgCl, and 0.01%
[wt/vol] gelatin), 2 µl of a mixture of 10 mM deoxynucleoside
triphosphates (equimolar concentrations of dATP, dCTP, dUTP, and dGTP),
1 µl of a 50 µM stock of the NS9 primer, 1 µl of a 50 µM stock
of the ITS6 primer, 2 µl of a 25 mM MgCl2 solution, and
0.5 µl (2.5 U) of AmpliTaq polymerase (Perkin-Elmer Cetus Corp.,
Norwalk, Conn.), with sterile distilled water making up the remaining volume.
To prevent contamination and to ensure assay reproducibility, large
batches of the PCR master mixture (excluding the AmpliTaq polymerase)
were prepared in advance and stored at
20°C until they were needed,
at which time sample DNA templates and the Taq DNA
polymerase were added and the reaction mixture was amplified. Positive-displacement pipettes were used in preparing all PCR mixtures.
The amplification was carried out in an isolated room, using a GeneAmp
9600 PCR system (Perkin-Elmer Cetus Corp., Foster City, Calif.), and
consisted of 30 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 54°C for 1 min, and
72°C for 1 min. A final extension was done at 72°C for 10 min.
At the Environmental Protection Agency, PCRs were carried out under
somewhat different conditions, briefly noted below. In a model 480 thermocycler (Perkin-Elmer), purified, extracted DNA, primers, and
deoxynucleoside triphosphates overlaid with mineral oil were heated at
94°C for 5 min and held at 72°C during addition of premixed enzyme
(High Fidelity enzyme mix; Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, Ind.),
1.5 mM MgCl2, 7% glycerol, and buffer provided with the
enzyme. The complete mixture was step cycled 30 times at 94°C for 1 min, 52°C for 15 min, and 68°C for 4 min, with a 7-min 68°C
extension following the final cycle.
One-microliter subsamples of each PCR amplification mixture were
electrophoresed through a 1.2% agarose gel in standard 1× Tris-borate-EDTA buffer. Gels were stained with a 0.5-µg/ml ethidium bromide solution for 30 min, destained in distilled water, and photographed with Polaroid type 57 film.
PCR product yields were estimated by comparison of the fluorescence
signals of the products with those of a series of known-mass standards
(Gibco/BRL, Grand Island, N.Y.), using a model SI fluorimager (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, Calif.).
DNA sequencing.
At OMH, the PCR fragments were cleaned and
purified by using Gene Max DNA purification cartridges (GIBCO Life
Technology, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada). At the Environmental
Protection Agency, they were subjected to three cycles of dilution with
distilled water and concentration by centrifugation in Centricon 100 concentrators (Millipore Corp., Bedford, Mass.) according to the
vendor's instructions for removal of unincorporated primers.
Sequencing reactions containing the purified, double-stranded PCR
products as templates were performed with ABI PRISM DyeTerminator cycle
sequencing kit reagents (Applied Biosystems Inc.) according to the
vendor's instructions. The sequencing strategy and the primers used
are shown in Fig. 1A and B, respectively. Purification of the extension products was performed by either a
phenol-chloroform extraction procedure or direct ethanol precipitation in accordance with the protocols provided by the vendor of the sequencing kits. Electrophoresis and automated analyses of sequence ladders were performed with a model 373A DNA sequencer (Perkin-Elmer). Compilation and editing of multiple sequences generated from each template were performed with the SeqMan analysis program
(Perkin-Elmer).

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Map of the rDNA regions sequenced in this study and
descriptions of PCR and sequencing primers. (A) Target sites of the
primers on the rDNA map. Forward primers are shown above the map, and
reverse primers are shown below it. (B) Sequences of the primers.
|
|
Sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis.
Sequences were
initially aligned and examined for redundancy by using the MegAlign
program within the Lasergene Biocomputing Software for Windows package
(DNASTAR Inc., Madison, Wis.). Unique sequences were realigned with
MultAlin 4.0 (F. Corpet, Centre de Recherches, INRA, Toulouse, France),
using default parameters. Manual editing of alignment gaps and
exclusion of positions having ambiguous alignments were performed with
MacClade version 3.0 (21). Phylogenetic trees were
constructed from the aligned sequence data by parsimony analysis using
the branch and bound search option in PAUP version 3.0 (30).
The branch and bound search option was also used for bootstrap analysis
(5) of 1,000 replicate samplings of the data in PAUP 3.0. Nucleotide substitutions were equally weighted and unordered, and
alignment gaps were treated as missing information in the phylogenetic analysis.
 |
RESULTS |
The segment of rDNA sequenced in this investigation included 164 bases at the 3' end of the small-subunit RNA gene, the entire ITS1 and
ITS2 regions and the 5.8S gene, and 81 bases at the 5' end of the
large-subunit RNA gene (Fig. 1). Among the 30 strains and 15 species
examined, a total of 13 different sequences were identified (Table 1).
The final alignment of these sequences contained a total of 866 nucleotide positions (Fig.
2). Of these, 27 were
manually excluded from parsimony analysis due to uncertain alignment
and another 787 positions were either constant or uninformative with
regard to parsimony. Of the 52 parsimony-informative positions, 3 occurred in the 5.8S gene, 33 occurred in the ITS1 region, and 16 occurred in the ITS2 region. The two most parsimonious trees of 72 steps were generated from a phylogenetic analysis of the alignment
data, using the branch and bound search method in PAUP version 3.0 (Fig. 3). The results showed that the ITS
sequence of T. rubrum is identical to that of its recent
segregates T. raubitschekii, T. kanei, and
T. fischeri. It is also highly similar to that of T. soudanense and T. megninii. These species form a well-supported clade with an apparent relationship to the A. benhamiae lineage of T. mentagrophytes isolates. One
anthropophilic endothrix tinea capitis species, T. yaoundei,
was shown to be closely allied with the simian-parasitizing species
Arthroderma simii, while another, T. tonsurans,
was shown to be very closely related to the morphologically and
physiologically dissimilar equine dermatophyte T. equinum.
T. equinum and T. tonsurans, in turn, are on
a well-supported branch that contains another major lineage with
anamorphs traditionally included in T. mentagrophytes,
namely, the Arthroderma vanbreuseghemii lineage. Very
closely related to A. vanbreuseghemii and associated anthropophilic T. mentagrophytes anamorphs is the recently
described species (16) T. krajdenii.






View larger version (562K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Aligned rDNA sequences of Trichophyton and
Arthroderma species. Abbreviations: A. vanbreusegh.,
A. vanbreuseghemii; T. mentagroph., T. mentagrophytes. The symbols + and designate mating
types, as shown in Table 1. T. mentagrophytes has two
sequence types, here designated as T. mentagroph.1 and T. mentagroph.2,
exemplified by strains UAMH 8543 and 7339, respectively. Positions 295 to 296, 325 to 329, 339, 386, 389, 639, 641 to 643, 754 to 761, 763, 765, 767, 769, and 771 of this alignment were determined to contain
ambiguously aligned nucleotides and were not included in phylogenetic
analyses.
|
|

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Phylogenetic relationships of Arthroderma and
Trichophyton species inferred from nucleotide sequences of
the rDNA ITS1 and ITS2 regions and 5.8S gene. This unrooted phylogram
is the consensus of the two most parsimonious trees (72 steps;
consistency index = 0.944, retention index 0.971) found by a
search conducted in PAUP 3.0 using the branch and bound method. Values
above the branches are the total nucleotide changes assigned by the
analysis, and values below the branches are the percentages of 1,000 bootstrap analysis replicates in which the branches occurred.
|
|
Sequence analysis also clearly distinguished the partially interfertile
American-European and African races of A. benhamiae. This
distinction has previously been shown in an ITS1 analysis by Makimura
et al. (22). A very atypical T. mentagrophytes
isolate with red colony reverse coloration and a growth requirement for exogenous inositol, UAMH 7339, clustered very closely to the
American-European A. benhamiae but was not identical to
A. benhamiae mating tester RV 26680.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Unlike some previous analyses based on less-variable nucleic acid
characters such as the 18S rDNA sequence and mitochondrial restriction
fragment length polymorphism markers (20, 26), ribosomal ITS
analysis distinguished species within closely
interrelated clades, such as T. rubrum-T. soudanense and
T. tonsurans-A. vanbreuseghemii. The former pair
of species is a particularly good example of lineages which, despite
close phylogenetic affinity, have become highly distinct in all
categories of phenotypic and habitat characters, including morphology,
physiology, ecology, and pathogenicity. To summarize, T. soudanense is an endemic sub-Saharan Africa species that generally
causes endothrix tinea capitis in children and tinea corporis in
adults, producing few conidia in culture but with characteristic
reflexive branching. It usually, but not always, has requirements for
exogenous growth substances (17, 32). T. rubrum
is a growth-factor-independent, cosmopolitan fungus, frequently, but
not always, at least moderately sporulating, without reflexive
branches; it is an agent of mainly tinea pedis and tinea unguium but
also tinea corporis, tinea cruris, and tinea manuum. An unequivocal
indicator of its differentiation from T. soudanense as a
pathogen is that it never causes endothrix tinea capitis, in the
typical childhood form of the disease or in any other, although in
adults it rarely causes an atypical scalp infection in which infectious
elements do not colonize the hair shaft either in the endothrix or the
ectothrix pattern (1).
A recent study (23) has shown that the North African-Middle
Eastern endemic endothrix tinea capitis species T. violaceum, which is also morphologically and physiologically
distinct from T. rubrum, is likewise closely related to it
as evidenced by ITS1 homology. In that report the authors state that
they interpret their results as signalling that "these `species' of
dermatophytes have been overclassified." We have argued in detail
elsewhere, however (29), that the most comprehensible way to
apply species concepts to the purely asexual anthropophilic
dermatophytes is to adhere to the asexual population genetics concept
of the cohesion species outlined by evolutionary phylogenist A. R. Templeton (31). In this concept, asexual isolates are held
to be conspecific if they consist of a monophyletic lineage which,
through sharing the same fundamental ecological niche, remains capable
of generating mutation-bearing variants that can in theory replace (by
random chance) or displace (by differential selection) previous and
alternative variants throughout the entire population. Habitat
disjunction, a measurable ecological character extrinsic to the
organism itself (11) (and therefore, for example, not
observable in individual cultures), is thus introduced as a criterion
for determining whether phenotypic and genotypic differences between
related asexual lineages have become significant at the species level.
Within ecologically uniform species such as T. soudanense,
it is clear that a new mutant, e.g., a hypothetical pathogenically fit
white (unpigmented) variant, could, over evolutionary time and with
sufficient normal human population interchange, predominate over and
then replace the yellow and red T. soudanense variants known
today. T. rubrum, however, never causes endothrix tinea
capitis; it is thus highly unlikely to give rise to a genetic variant
that could replace T. soudanense within its fundamental
niche. Nor could a T. soudanense variant realistically be
expected to replace T. rubrum throughout its niche. The
ecological unity of clades such as T. soudanense and
T. violaceum, encompassing populations subject to the
asexual gene flow mechanisms of chance replacement or selective
displacement (two concepts distinguished in detail by Templeton
[31]), validates them as species biologically distinct
from at least T. rubrum if not from each other.
This type of analysis, at least for species like anthropophilic
dermatophytes, for which ecological distributions are exquisitely well
documented, gives us an objective means to determine where observed
differences in sequence analyses of variable genetic regions begin to
reflect biologically functional species-level divergences in asexual
clades. It avoids attributing species status to asexual clades on the
basis of minor, evolutionarily recent divergences affecting areas of
the genome with little or no relevance to the phenotypic functions
which determine the structure of populations. At the same time, it also
avoids the taxonomic fusing of completely ecologically and
phenotypically diverged populations, likely distinguished by
significant differences in DNA regions coding for externally interactive phenotypic characters, on the basis of similarities in more
or less arbitrarily structured DNA regions. The latter DNA regions are
those which are noncoding or which code for characters other than those
giving rise to the strongly selected, ecologically interactive elements
of phenotype. With highly related, recently adaptively
radiated, sexually reproducing groups such as East African
cichlids, the elucidation of mating barriers has shown that species
divergence can take place during evolutionary time periods which allow
for unexpectedly low levels of divergence in the most-hypervariable
regions of DNA in genes, such as ribosomal genes, commonly used in
phylogenetic analysis (24). Elucidation of niche separations
yielding population-based "demographic exchangeability" (31) barriers (that is, barriers to new alleles pervading
the entire population through displacement and/or replacement, as outlined above) may provide similar corrective information when comparable DNA sequences in asexual organisms must be analyzed.
A second example of the applicability of cohesion species concepts to
dermatophytes is provided within the present study by the close
similarity of ITS1 and ITS2 sequences of T. tonsurans and
T. equinum. The former species is a cosmopolitan, strictly anthropophilic endothrix tinea capitis agent. Cultures of T. tonsurans are distinguished by their thick microconidial pedicels,
frequently inflated microconidia ("balloon forms"), and thiamine
requirement. The latter dermatophyte is restricted to horses except for
limited crossover to cause tinea corporis in humans (or rarely other
dermatophytoses, but not childhood endothrix tinea capitis), usually
after direct interspecies contact. It usually has a nicotinic acid
requirement but is on rare occasions autotrophic, and it has
uninflated, scarcely pedicellate (or, more often,
nonpedicellate) microconidia. Clearly, however closely lineally
coderived these species may be, with only a single-base-pair difference
manifest in the variable regions assessed in this study, they not only
have fixed a number of phenotypic apomorphies (that is, derived [i.e.,
novel] nonancestral characteristics [10]) within
their populations but also have a sharply defined niche separation
which prevents T. equinum variants from replacing or
displacing T. tonsurans variants and vice versa.
Therefore, they remain unequivocally separate species despite
their highly similar ITS sequences. A similar argument should be made
to maintain the separation between the monkey dermatophyte T. simii and the morphologically entirely distinct, endemic African
anthropophilic endothrix tinea capitis agent T. yaoundei.
A recent ITS sequence study by Gräser et al. (7) has
placed T. equinum near Epidermophyton stockdaleae
in a lineage of nonpathogenic, geophilic dermatophytoids. This
placement was based on a misidentified isolate deposited in the
Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures culture collection
(3a).
Besides encompassing some apparently well-defined cohesion species, the
present study also encompasses some described species which do not
appear to be supported by this species definition. For example, the ITS
sequence of T. krajdenii is identical to that of some
isolates of the A. vanbreuseghemii clade of T. mentagrophytes (a clade whose anamorphs are called T. interdigitale by some authors [25]). This
recently described (16) species was traditionally known as
the nodular variant of T. mentagrophytes subsequent to its
informal description by Georg and Maechling in 1949 (6). (It
should be noted that T. mentagrophytes var.
nodulare, an ad hoc varietal name often used for T. krajdenii, is invalid under the International Code of
Botanical Nomenclature, lacking both a type specimen and an explicit
description with a Latin diagnosis.) Although it displays
phenotypically distinct characters such as intense yellow pigmentation
and a high proportion of nodular bodies, it is primarily an agent of
human lower-body dermatophytoses (especially tinea pedis, tinea
unguium, and tinea corporis), just like its relatives classified as
anthropophilic strains of T. mentagrophytes sensu lato. In
this case, clearly such variants, though distinct, could be
ecologically replaced by other variants within their own monophyletic
line (except in the highly unlikely event that in their growth on the
human lower body they occupy niche space inaccessible to the other
variants). T. krajdenii, therefore, despite its distinct
morphological anomalies, is not currently supportable as a cohesion
species. Further studies will be needed to determine its taxonomic
status. If more-detailed genomic population analyses reveal that it is
polyphyletic, it will represent only a variant phenotype that cannot be
given a taxonomic rank. If, however, genomic population analyses reveal
it to be monophyletic, and if it does not include isolates which
intergrade with typical asexual, anthropophilic anamorphs of A. vanbreuseghemii (29), it will clearly be set apart as a
distinct clade at some level. One proposed species definition, the
phylogenetic species concept (PSC) of Nixon and Wheeler
(27), would result in such a clade being classified as a
species: "We define species as the smallest aggregation
of ... lineages (asexual) diagnosable by a unique combination of
character states in comparable individuals. . . . . Under the PSC,
when unique character combinations occur in asexual or clonal forms,
these forms should be recognized as distinct species." Such a
definition, applied literally, might result in a large number of new
species among the clonally diverse asexual dermatophytes. An
alternative, if cohesion species concepts were adopted as suggested above, would be to regard such clades as Linnaean varieties.
The species most closely related to T. rubrum form a complex
picture. T. raubitschekii, the most commonly isolated of the T. rubrum segregates, is partially ecologically distinct
from typical T. rubrum isolates. As shown prior to its
elevation to species status by English (4) and subsequently
by Kane et al. (15), it mainly causes tinea corporis and
tinea cruris in tropical populations for which wearing of shoes has
historically been uncommon. T. rubrum causes a statistically
highly significantly greater proportion of foot dermatophytoses than
other types of infections, and it mostly affects temperate-region
populations that consistently use footwear (15). Typical
T. rubrum isolates overlap with T. raubitschekii
in frequently causing tinea corporis and tinea cruris, while a small
but consistent proportion of T. raubitschekii infections are
of the feet and nails. The latter fungus also has some distinct morphological and physiological characters, viz., heavy
macroconidiation, the presence of profusely produced and often rounded
microconidia, and production of a urease enzyme. In phylogenetic
analysis, however, these are symplesiomorphies (shared ancestral-type
characteristics, in this case consistent with putative ancestral
lineages in the T. mentagrophytes complex) and do not
support distinct species status the way a suite of synapomorphies
(shared derived characteristics) would (10). The disjunction
between populations and body sites supporting T. rubrum and T. raubitschekii, despite its
high level of statistical support, is not so profound that
population-wide genetic replacement or displacement over time cannot be
envisioned. T. raubitschekii, unlike T. soudanense, does not have a significant portion of niche into
which T. rubrum is physiologically unequipped to penetrate.
Therefore, even though T. rubrum and T. raubitschekii have relatively high levels of morphological,
physiological, and ecological distinctiveness, the retention of
phylogenetic species status requires further evaluation. Analyses of
other variable regions of DNA may aid in elucidating the exact nature
of the genetic relationship between T. rubrum and T. raubitschekii.
T. kanei diverges from T. raubitschekii only by a
single discrete apomorphy, namely the complete absence of the ability
to differentiate microconidia, and by a quantitative character, an attenuation in the degree of urease activity. The sites of its isolation are consistent with sites of T. raubitschekii
isolation. Its ultimate taxonomic assignment will clearly depend on
that accorded to the latter organism.
T. fischeri was described as having a habitat different from
that of T. rubrum. It has not been isolated as an agent of
dermatophytosis, but only as a contaminant on laboratory media and
uninfected skin and nails (13) and in sputum
(28). Kane (13, 14) proposed that it is
saprophyte distinct from T. rubrum. Its possession of
an ITS sequence identical to that of T. rubrum appears to
contradict this assessment. A detailed discussion of the ecological
data on this taxon is beyond the scope of the present paper, but it should be noted that the consistently heavily conidial nature of
T. fischeri strains is consistent with their regular
isolation from uninfected body sites or environmental sources. They may represent a genetic type, within the T. rubrum lineage,
possessing an elevated ability to produce aerially disseminable conidia
during growth on environmental materials such as shed skin scales.
The ITS sequence data on dermatophytes confirm that ecologically and
phenotypically strongly separated species may have only small numbers
of differences even in this normally highly variable genetic region. It
is clear that understanding population structure and making the best
informed decision about species status in certain complex groups, such
as the A. vanbreuseghemii anamorphs and the related
T. krajdenii, as well as the taxa most closely related
to T. rubrum, will require the study of additional loci. Multilocus genotyping studies, as have been done with other medically important fungi (2), must be recommended for further
analysis of these important human pathogens.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
Maria Witkowska is thanked for technical support. Lynne Sigler
(University of Alberta Microfungus Collection), Irene Weitzman, and Guy
St.-Germain are thanked for supplying cultures used in this study. The
collaboration made possible by A. Dufour is greatly appreciated.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Mycology
Laboratory, Laboratories Branch, Ontario Ministry of Health, 81 Resources Rd., Toronto, Ontario M9P 3T1, Canada. Phone: (416) 235-5719. Fax: (416) 235-5951. E-mail:
summerri{at}mail1.moh.gov.on.ca.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Bargman, H.,
J. Kane,
M.-L. Baxter, and R. C. Summerbell.
1995.
Tinea capitis due to Trichophyton rubrum in adult women.
Mycoses
38:231-234[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Burt, A.,
B. M. Dechairo,
G. L. Koenig,
D. A. Carter,
T. J. White, and J. W. Taylor.
1997.
Molecular markers reveal differentiation among isolates of Coccidioides immitis from California, Arizona and Texas.
Mol. Ecol.
6:781-786[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Carbone, I., and L. M. Kohn.
1993.
Ribosomal DNA sequence divergence within internal transcribed spacer 1 of the Sclerotiniaceae.
Mycologia
85:415-427.
|
| 3a.
| de Hoog, G. S. Personal communication.
|
| 4.
|
English, M. P.
1980.
Ecological aspects of dermatophytes regarded essentially as anthropophilic, p. 53-59.
In
H.-J. Preusser (ed.), Medical mycology. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, Germany.
|
| 5.
|
Felsenstein, J.
1985.
Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap.
Evolution
39:783-791.
|
| 6.
|
Georg, L. K., and E. H. Maechling.
1949.
Trichophyton mentagrophytes (variety nodular).
J. Invest. Dermatol.
13:339-350[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Gräser, Y.,
M. El Fari,
R. Vigalys,
A. F. A. Kuijpers,
G. S. de Hoog,
W. Presber, and H.-J. Tietz.
1999.
Phylogeny and taxonomy of the family Arthrodermataceae (dermatophytes) using sequence analysis of the ribosomal ITS region.
Med. Mycol.
37:105-114.
[Medline] |
| 8.
|
Harmsen, D.,
A. Schwinn,
M. Weig,
E.-B. Brocker, and J. Heesemann.
1995.
Phylogeny and dating of some pathogenic keratinophilic fungi using small subunit ribosomal RNA.
J. Med. Vet. Mycol.
33:299-303[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Hejtmanek, M., and N. Hejtmankova.
1989.
Hybridization and sexual stimulation in Trichophyton mentagrophytes.
Folia Microbiol.
34:77-79.
|
| 10.
|
Hennig, W.
1979.
Phylogenetic systematics.
University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
|
| 11.
|
Horvath, C. D.
1997.
Some questions about identifying individuals: failed intuitions about organisms and species.
Philos. Sci.
64:654-658.
|
| 12.
|
Ishizaki, H.
1993.
Fungal taxonomy based on mitochondria DNA analysis.
Jpn. J. Med. Mycol.
34:243-251.
|
| 13.
|
Kane, J.
1977.
Trichophyton fischeri sp. nov.: a saprophyte resembling Trichophyton rubrum.
Sabouraudia
15:231-241[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Kane, J.
1997.
The biological aspects of the Kane/Fischer system for identification of dermatophytes, p. 81-129.
In
J. Kane, R. C. Summerbell, L. Sigler, S. Krajden, and G. Land (ed.), Laboratory handbook of dermatophytes. Star Publishing, Belmont, Calif.
|
| 15.
|
Kane, J.,
S. Krajden,
R. C. Summerbell, and G. Sibbald.
1990.
Infections caused by Trichophyton raubitschekii: clinical and epidemiological features.
Mycoses
33:499-506[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Kane, J.,
J. A. Scott,
R. C. Summerbell, and B. Diena.
1992.
Trichophyton krajdenii, sp. nov.: an anthropophilic dermatophyte.
Mycotaxon
45:307-316.
|
| 17.
|
Kane, J.,
R. C. Summerbell,
L. Sigler,
S. Krajden, and G. Land (ed.).
1997.
Laboratory handbook of dermatophytes.
Star Publishing, Belmont, Calif.
|
| 18.
|
Kawasaki, M.,
M. Aoki,
H. Ishizaki,
K. Nishio,
T. Mochizuki, and S. Watanabe.
1992.
Phylogenetic relationships of the genera Arthroderma and Nannizzia inferred from mitochondrial DNA analysis.
Mycopathologia
118:95-102[Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Kawasaki, M.,
M. Aoki,
H. Ishizaki,
K. Nishimura, and M. Miyaji.
1996.
Phylogeny of Epidermophyton floccosum and other dermatophytes.
Mycopathologia
134:121-128[Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Leclerc, M. C.,
H. Philippe, and E. Guého.
1994.
Phylogeny of dermatophytes and dimorphic fungi based on large subunit ribosomal RNA sequence comparisons.
J. Med. Vet. Mycol.
32:331-341[Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Madison, W. P., and D. R. Madison.
1992.
MacClade: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution, version 3.0.
Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.
|
| 22.
|
Makimura, K.,
T. Mochizuki,
A. Hasegawa,
K. Uchida,
H. Saito, and H. Yamaguchi.
1998.
Phylogenetic classification of Trichophyton mentagrophytes complex strains based on DNA sequences of nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer 1 regions.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
36:2629-2633[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Makimura, K.,
Y. Tamura,
T. Mochizuki,
A. Hasegawa,
Y. Tajiri,
R. Hanazawa,
K. Uchida,
H. Saito, and H. Yamaguchi.
1999.
Phylogenetic classification and species identification of dermatophyte strains based on DNA sequences of nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer 1 regions.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
37:920-924[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Meyer, A.,
T. D. Kocher,
P. Basasibwaki, and A. C. Wilson.
1990.
Monophyletic origin of Lake Victoria cichlid fishes suggested by mitochondrial DNA sequences.
Nature
347:550-553.
|
| 25.
|
Mochizuki, T. K.,
K. Takada,
S. Watanabe,
M. Kawasaki, and H. Ishizaki.
1990.
Taxonomy of Trichophyton interdigitale (Trichophyton mentagrophytes var. interdigitale) by restriction enzyme analysis of mitochondrial DNA.
J. Med. Vet. Mycol.
28:191-196[Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Nishio, K.,
M. Kawasaki, and H. Ishizaki.
1992.
Phylogeny of the genus Trichophyton using mitochondrial DNA analysis.
Mycopathologia
117:127-132[Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Nixon, K. C., and Q. D. Wheeler.
1990.
An amplification of the phylogenetic species concept.
Cladistics
6:211-223.
|
| 28.
|
Rosenthal, S. A.,
J. S. Scott,
R. C. Summerbell, and J. Kane.
1998.
First isolation of Trichophyton fischeri in the United States.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
36:3389-3391[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Summerbell, R. C.,
A. Li, and R. Haugland.
1997.
What constitutes a functional species in the asexual dermatophytes?
Microbiol. Cult. Collect.
13:29-37.
|
| 30.
|
Swofford, D. L.
1991.
PAUP: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony, version 3.0.
Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.
|
| 31.
|
Templeton, A. R.
1989.
The meaning of species and speciation: a genetic perspective, p. 3-27.
In
D. Otte, and J. A. Endler (ed.), Speciation and its consequences. Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, Mass.
|
| 32.
|
Weitzman, I.,
I. F. Salkin, and S. A. Rosenthal.
1983.
Evaluation of Trichophyton agars for identification of Trichophyton soudanense.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
18:203-205[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, December 1999, p. 4005-4011, Vol. 37, No. 12
0095-1137/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Li, H. C., Bouchara, J.-P., Hsu, M. M.-L., Barton, R., Su, S., Chang, T. C.
(2008). Identification of dermatophytes by sequence analysis of the rRNA gene internal transcribed spacer regions. J Med Microbiol
57: 592-600
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kong, F., Tong, Z., Chen, X., Sorrell, T., Wang, B., Wu, Q., Ellis, D., Chen, S.
(2008). Rapid Identification and Differentiation of Trichophyton Species, Based on Sequence Polymorphisms of the Ribosomal Internal Transcribed Spacer Regions, by Rolling-Circle Amplification. J. Clin. Microbiol.
46: 1192-1199
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Frealle, E., Rodrigue, M., Gantois, N., Aliouat, C.-M., Delaporte, E., Camus, D., Dei-Cas, E., Kauffmann-Lacroix, C., Guillot, J., Delhaes, L.
(2007). Phylogenetic analysis of Trichophyton mentagrophytes human and animal isolates based on MnSOD and ITS sequence comparison. Microbiology
153: 3466-3477
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Li, H. C., Bouchara, J.-P., Hsu, M. M.-L., Barton, R., Chang, T. C.
(2007). Identification of Dermatophytes by an Oligonucleotide Array. J. Clin. Microbiol.
45: 3160-3166
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Binstock, J. M.
(2007). Molecular Biology Techniques for Identifying Dermatophytes and Their Possible Use in Diagnosing Onychomycosis in Human Toenail: A Review. J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc.
97: 134-144
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Monod, M., Bontems, O., Zaugg, C., Lechenne, B., Fratti, M., Panizzon, R.
(2006). Fast and reliable PCR/sequencing/RFLP assay for identification of fungi in onychomycoses.. J Med Microbiol
55: 1211-1216
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Baeza, L. C., Matsumoto, M. T., Almeida, A. M. F., Mendes-Giannini, M. J. S.
(2006). Strain differentiation of Trichophyton rubrum by randomly amplified polymorphic DNA and analysis of rDNA nontranscribed spacer.. J Med Microbiol
55: 429-436
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Gaedigk, A., Gaedigk, R., Abdel-Rahman, S. M.
(2003). Genetic Heterogeneity in the rRNA Gene Locus of Trichophyton tonsurans. J. Clin. Microbiol.
41: 5478-5487
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ninet, B., Jan, I., Bontems, O., Lechenne, B., Jousson, O., Panizzon, R., Lew, D., Monod, M.
(2003). Identification of Dermatophyte Species by 28S Ribosomal DNA Sequencing with a Commercial Kit. J. Clin. Microbiol.
41: 826-830
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
LIU, D., PEARCE, L., LILLEY, G., COLOE, S., BAIRD, R., PEDERSEN, J.
(2002). PCR identification of dermatophyte fungi Trichophyton rubrum, T. soudanense and T. gourvilii. J Med Microbiol
51: 117-122
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kumeda, Y., Asao, T.
(2001). Heteroduplex Panel Analysis, a Novel Method for Genetic Identification of Aspergillus Section Flavi Strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
67: 4084-4090
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Gupta, A. K., Kohli, Y., Summerbell, R. C.
(2001). Variation in Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphisms among Serial Isolates from Patients with Trichophyton rubrum Infection. J. Clin. Microbiol.
39: 3260-3266
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Jackson, C. J., Barton, R. C., Kelly, S. L., Evans, E. G. V.
(2000). Strain Identification of Trichophyton rubrum by Specific Amplification of Subrepeat Elements in the Ribosomal DNA Nontranscribed Spacer. J. Clin. Microbiol.
38: 4527-4534
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Gräser, Y., Kuijpers, A. F. A., Presber, W., de Hoog, G. S.
(2000). Molecular Taxonomy of the Trichophyton rubrum Complex. J. Clin. Microbiol.
38: 3329-3336
[Abstract]
[Full Text]