Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, December 1999, p. 4048-4050, Vol. 37, No. 12
0095-1137/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Comparison of a Nonradiometric Liquid-Medium
Method (MB REDOX) with the BACTEC System for Growth and
Identification of Mycobacteria in Clinical Specimens
Yung-Ching
Liu,1,2,3,*
Tsi-Shu
Huang,1 and
Wen-Kuei
Huang1
Section of
Microbiology1 and Infectious
Diseases,2 Veterans General Hospital-Kaohsiung,
Kaohsiung, and National Yang-Ming University,
Taipei,3 Taiwan, Republic of China
Received 24 August 1998/Returned for modification 4 December
1998/Accepted 3 September 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
Early identification of tuberculosis in the clinical setting is of
great importance in order for specific therapy to be swiftly initiated.
MB REDOX (Heipha Diagnostika), a growth-based medium without
radioactive materials, was evaluated and was compared to the BACTEC
system for detection of mycobacteria, including the Mycobacterium
tuberculosis complex and atypical mycobacteria. MB REDOX consists
of a Kirchner medium enriched with growth-promoting additives,
antibiotic compounds, and a redox indicator which can be monitored to
detect growth of mycobacteria with the naked eye. MB REDOX only detects
growth and cannot differentiate the M. tuberculosis complex
(M. tuberculosis, M. bovis, and M. africanum) from other species of Mycobacterium.
Therefore, PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis (PRA)
was used in this investigation to identify to the species level
organisms showing positive growth with MB REDOX. Our data demonstrate
the usefulness of MB REDOX for the detection of mycobacteria in
clinical specimens. The rate of detection of M. tuberculosis complex with MB REDOX (84.3%) was higher than that
with the BACTEC system (68.6%). When combined with PRA for species
identification, MB REDOX is easy to perform and is suited to most
clinical laboratory settings for the detection and identification of mycobacteria.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Tuberculosis remains a major health
threat, and the rapid emergence of drug-resistant mycobacteria has
strengthened the demand for methods for the rapid detection of
mycobacteria in clinical samples. Since the prevention of tuberculosis
relies on early detection and cure of infectious cases (14),
current efforts are focused upon improvements in the rapidity of
identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, which would
allow prompt initiation of appropriate therapy. Although the PCR-based
technique for the diagnosis of tuberculosis has been well established
(1-6, 9, 11, 12), culture still remains the "gold
standard" method. However, because M. tuberculosis has a
doubling time of 16 to 18 h, current methodology does not allow
fast detection and identification, leaving patients, contacts, and
health care workers at risk. Our focus is on shortening the delay
(often weeks long) for confirmation of a result by culture. Use of
liquid culture media is one way of considerably shortening this delay.
The BACTEC 460 system (Becton Dickinson) is recognized as a reference
method, combining the advantage of liquid medium with automation.
Unfortunately, this system uses a radiometric method for the detection
of mycobacterial growth. Separate disposal of the radioactive waste
produced presents a considerable problem in terms of increased costs.
MB REDOX is a ready-to-use liquid medium produced by the company
Heipha/Biotest (Heipha Diagnostika). This medium is made of a Kirchner
medium (7) enriched with growth-promoting additives and an
antibiotic compound, PACT (polymyxin B, amphotericin B, carbenicillin,
and trimethoprim). The medium also contains a redox indicator, a
colorless tetrazolium salt which is reduced to a colored formazan
during the growth of mycobacteria. In this process, the pinhead-size colonies produced by M. tuberculosis take on a red to dark
purple coloring, which is typical for organisms grown on Kirchner
medium. Through the redox system of the growing mycobacteria, a
colorless tetrazolium salt contained in the medium is reduced to a red- or purple-colored formazan. In this way the mycobacterial colonies acquire a coloring which can be seen with the naked eye.
The goal of this study is to compare growth and time to detection of
mycobacteria with a new nonradiometric liquid medium with those with
the BACTEC 460 system. MB REDOX, combined with PCR-restriction
fragment length polymorphism analysis (PRA) for identification to the
species level, was subjected to testing with a total of 997 clinical
samples, as was the BACTEC 460 system.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Specimen collection and processing.
Specimens were collected
from patients who were either suspected of having tuberculosis or who
were being monitored for treatment with antituberculosis drugs at the
Veterans General Hospital-Kaohsiung, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, from April to
June 1997. A total of 995 specimens from 545 patients were
investigated, including specimens obtained from the respiratory tract,
body fluids, tissues, wound, pus, and skin. Specimens which could not
be processed immediately were stored at 2 to 6°C for no longer than
72 h. All specimens were analyzed for growth of mycobacteria by
using the BACTEC 460 system (Becton Dickinson Diagnostic Instrument
Systems, Towson, Md.) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Specimens were decontaminated and digested with 2% NaOH in 0.5%
N-acetyl-L-cysteine and were concentrated
(8). Following digestion, decontamination, and concentration, all specimens were divided, with one-half used for
modified Middlebrook medium 12B and one-half used for MB REDOX. The
incubation took place over a period of 8 weeks at a temperature of
36 ± 1°C.
Smear examination.
Smears of the digested and decontaminated
specimens were stained with rhodamine-auramine and Ziehl-Neelsen stain
and were examined by standard procedures (8) for acid-fast
bacilli (AFB).
Culture and identification with BACTEC 460 system.
Culture
for mycobacteria was performed by inoculation of the digested,
decontaminated, and concentrated material into one BACTEC 12B bottle.
Growth was monitored with the BACTEC 460 instrument (Becton Dickinson
Diagnostic Instrument Systems). The
p-nitro-
-acetyl-amino-
-hydroxypropiophenone (NAP) test
was performed when the bottle was detected as positive (growth index
[GI], >50). A decrease or lack of change in the GI in the presence
of NAP is presumptive evidence of M. tuberculosis.
Culture and identification by MB REDOX-PRA.
Initial readings
by observation of red- or purple-colored particles with the naked eye
were taken from MB REDOX after 24 h and then twice weekly from the
1st to the 3rd weeks. From the 4th to the 8th weeks, the readings were
performed once weekly. The criteria for a positive culture was the
presence of red- or purple-stained colonies. The culture was confirmed
by microscopy and was identified by PRA of the hsp65 gene
(6, 12), which is present in all mycobacteria. The digested
PCR products obtained by using primers common to all mycobacteria
(10, 13) were evaluated by the algorithm established
previously (12), thus allowing rapid identification of
mycobacteria to the species level.
The contamination rate for each culture method is defined as the
percentage of those cultures considered to be positive for AFB by the
interpretive criteria for that method, as stated above, in which
contamination with bacteria was noted.
 |
RESULTS |
Detection of growth by culture.
Results of a comparison of MB
REDOX with the BACTEC 460 system for the detection mycobacteria and
growth for 995 specimens from 545 patients are shown in Table
1. The isolation rates were similar for
both methods. One hundred two (10.3%) specimens yielded positive
growth with the BACTEC 460 system, whereas 104 (10.5%) specimens were
positive with MB REDOX.
The times to detection of
M. tuberculosis complex were also
similar with MB REDOX and the BACTEC 460 system (Table
2). The
average and median times to
detection of the
M. tuberculosis complex
were 24 and 19 days, respectively, with the BACTEC 460 system
and 23 and 23 days,
respectively, with MB REDOX. The range of
times to detection for the
BACTEC 460 system was broader, from
as early as 4 days to 74 days,
whereas it was 8 to 51 days for
MB REDOX. The average time to detection
for MB REDOX was 2 days
shorter than that for the BACTEC 460 system for
those
M. tuberculosis complex-infected samples for which the
initial acid-fast smear
results were positive. For those samples that
yielded
M. tuberculosis complex on culture but for which the
initial acid-fast smear results
were negative, detection times were the
same with the two media.
Identification of mycobacteria.
In order to determine the
species of mycobacteria detected with MB REDOX, we chose a PCR
approach, PRA. The species data generated with the BACTEC 460 system
linked with the NAP test were then compared to the species data
generated by MB REDOX-PRA. Table 3 shows
that 70 M. tuberculosis complex isolates, 20 isolates of
Mycobacterium other than M. tuberculosis (MOTT),
and 12 AFB (AFB were seen but could not be further identified) were
detected with the BACTEC 460 system, while 86 M. tuberculosis complex isolates and 18 isolates of MOTT (5 M. kansasii, 5 M. intracellulare, 1 M. triviale, 1 M. gordonae, 3 M. fortuitum, and
3 M. abscessus isolates) were detected with MB REDOX.
Thirty-two specimens were culture positive with MB REDOX but were not
detected with the BACTEC 460 system, including 26
M. tuberculosis complex isolates and 6 isolates of MOTT. Thirty
specimens
were culture positive with the BACTEC 460 system but were not
detected with MB REDOX, including 14
M. tuberculosis
complex,
12 MOTT, and 4 AFB isolates not further identified (Table
3).
The isolate in one specimen identified as MOTT with the BACTEC
460 system was revealed to be an
M. tuberculosis complex isolate
by MB REDOX-PRA. The isolates in two specimens identified as
M. tuberculosis complex by BACTEC were reported as MOTT by MB
REDOX-PRA.
Isolates in five and three specimens reported to be AFB
positive
with the BACTEC 460 system were identified as
M. tuberculosis complex and MOTT,
respectively.
One hundred thirty specimens were culture positive and were identified
by either the BACTEC 460 system-NAP or MB REDOX-PRA
approach. The
results were compared with those of the microscopic
acid-fast staining
method (Table
4). The BACTEC 460 system
identified
70 (68.6%)
M. tuberculosis complex isolates,
including 34 that
were acid-fast positive and 36 that were acid-fast
negative. The
MB REDOX-PRA detected 86 (84.3%)
M. tuberculosis complex isolates,
including 40 that were acid-fast
positive and 46 that were acid-fast
negative. The 44 acid-fast
stain-positive samples showed growth
of
M. tuberculosis
complex only with the BACTEC 460 system for
4 samples and only with MB
REDOX for 10 samples. The 58 acid-fast
stain-negative samples showed
growth of
M. tuberculosis complex
only with the BACTEC 460 system for 12 samples and only with MB
REDOX for 22 samples.
The contamination rates were 7.41% with the BACTEC 460 system and
12.06% with MB REDOX. The PRA method is able to detect mycobacteria
in
the presence of contaminating bacteria. In the BACTEC 460 system,
contamination of bacteria made the identification of mycobacteria
impossible for 17 specimens, for 13 of which mycobacteria were
detected
with MB REDOX, including 10
M. tuberculosis and 3 MOTT
isolates that were identified with MB REDOX but that were missed
by the
BACTEC 460 system due to contamination with
bacteria.
 |
DISCUSSION |
This study showed that both systems have comparable abilities in
terms of speed of detection and yield of mycobacteria. However, a
higher rate of isolation of M. tuberculosis complex by MB
REDOX-PRA (84.3%) in comparison with that with the BACTEC 460 system
(68.6%) was found. The rate of detection of nontuberculous
mycobacteria with the BACTEC 460 system was better than that by MB
REDOX-PRA. However, the overall performance of MB REDOX with body
fluids and tissue seems to be better than that with the BACTEC 460 system.
Further advantages of MB REDOX include the ease of handling. The
antibiotic compound is already incorporated into the medium that is
purchased; therefore, the extra labor for adding supplement as required
for the BACTEC 12B medium is not necessary. Detection of growth is made
by observation with the naked eye and does not require daily testing of
the GI. No instrument is required. A further positive factor is the
combination of PRA and MB REDOX, with PRA used for the identification
of the mycobacteria detected with MB REDOX. We selected PRA in this
investigation to identify species with positive growth on MB REDOX
because of its ease and rapidity and because it may help identify
numerous species of mycobacteria within a single experiment. Thus, MB
REDOX has the advantages of rapidity, sensitivity, and feasibility in
the presence of contaminating bacteria.
The major disadvantage of MB REDOX is that there is no complete
identification procedure following detection. The medium, MB REDOX, is
only able to detect growth and does not differentiate the M. tuberculosis complex (M. tuberculosis, M. bovis, and M. africanum) from other species. An
external method, such as PRA, must be applied. In addition, no drug
susceptibility tests following detection in MB REDOX have been adapted
for use with this medium.
MB REDOX can be used in most clinical laboratory settings without
expensive instruments and intensive labor. Also, use of MB REDOX avoids
the need for exposure to radioactive materials and disposal of
radioactive waste.
Our data demonstrate the utility of MB REDOX for the detection of
mycobacteria in clinical specimens. In addition, the benefits of other
approaches with molecular probes (such as those used in the BACTEC 460 system) can easily be achieved with MB REDOX. If combined with a means
such as PRA for the identification of species, tests with MB REDOX are
easy to perform and are suitable for most clinical laboratory settings.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Section of
Infectious Diseases, Veterans General Hospital-Kaohsiung, 386 Ta-Chung
1st Rd., Kaohsiung, Taiwan, Republic of China. Phone: (07)3468098. Fax:
(07)3416137. E-mail: hhlin{at}isca.vghks.gov.tw.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Clarridge, J. E., III,
R. M. Shawar,
T. M. Shinnick, and B. B. Plikaytis.
1993.
Large-scale use of polymerase chain reaction for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a routine mycobacteriology laboratory.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
31:2049-2056[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Eisenach, K. D.,
M. D. Sifford,
M. D. Cave,
J. H. Bates, and J. T. Crawford.
1991.
Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum samples using a polymerase chain reaction.
Am. Rev. Respir. Dis.
144:1160-1163[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Folgueira, L.,
R. Delgado,
E. Palenque, and A. R. Noriega.
1993.
Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA in clinical samples by using a simple lysis method and polymerase chain reaction.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
31:1019-1021[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Forbes, B. A., and K. E. Hicks.
1994.
Ability of PCR assay to identify Mycobacterium tuberculosis in BACTEC 12B vials.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
32:1725-1728[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Huang, T. S.,
Y. C. Liu,
H. H. Lin,
W. K. Huang, and D. L. Cheng.
1996.
Comparison of the Roche AMPLICOR MYCOBACTERIUM assay and Digene SHARP Signal System with in-house PCR and culture for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in respiratory specimens.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
34:3092-3096[Abstract].
|
| 6.
|
Huang, T. S.,
Y. C. Liu,
W. K. Huang,
C. C. Chen, and H. Z. Tu.
1996.
Evaluation of polymerase chain reaction-restriction enzyme analysis of mycobacteria cultured in BACTEC 12B bottles.
J. Formos. Med. Assoc.
95:530-535[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Naumann, L.
1990.
Die Leistungsfahigkeit von Flussihkulturen bei der Untersuchung auf Mykobakterien.
Pneumologie
4:731-734.
|
| 8.
|
Nolte, F. S., and B. Metchock.
1995.
Mycobacterium, p. 409-414.
In
P. R. Murray, E. J. Baron, M. A. Pfaller, and F. C. Tenover (ed.), Manual of clinical microbiology, 6th ed. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
|
| 9.
|
Plikaytis, B.,
B. Plikaytis,
M. Yakrus,
W. Butler,
C. Woodley,
V. Silcox, and T. Shinnick.
1992.
Differentiation of slowly growing Mycobacterium species, including Mycobacterium tuberculosis by gene amplification and restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
30:1815-1822[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Shinnick, T. M.
1987.
The 65-kilodalton antigen of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
J. Bacteriol.
169:1080-1088[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Sjobring, U.,
M. Mecklenburg,
A. B. Andersen, and H. Miorner.
1990.
Polymerase chain reaction for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
28:2200-2204[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Telenti, A.,
F. Marchesi,
M. Balz,
F. Bally,
E. C. Bottger, and T. Bodmer.
1993.
Rapid identification of mycobacteria to the species level by polymerase chain reaction and restriction enzyme analysis.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
31:175-178[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Thole, J. E. R., and R. van der Zee.
1990.
The 65kD antigen: molecular studies on an ubiquitous antigen, p. 37-67.
In
J. Mcfadden (ed.), Molecular biology of the mycobacteria. Surrey University Press, London, England.
|
| 14.
|
World Health Organization.
1994.
WHO Tuberculosis Programme: framework for effective tuberculosis control. Publication no. WHO/TB/94.179.
World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
|
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, December 1999, p. 4048-4050, Vol. 37, No. 12
0095-1137/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Saves, I., Lewis, L.-A., Westrelin, F., Warren, R., Daffe, M., Masson, J.-M.
(2002). Specificities and Functions of the recA and pps1 Intein Genes of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Application for Diagnosis of Tuberculosis. J. Clin. Microbiol.
40: 943-950
[Abstract]
[Full Text]