Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, December 1999, p. 4145-4149, Vol. 37, No. 12
0095-1137/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Unusual, High Genetic Diversity of Aleutian Mink Disease
Virus
Anders
Olofsson,1
Christian
Mittelholzer,1
Louise
Treiberg Berndtsson,2
Lars
Lind,2
Torbjörn
Mejerland,2 and
Sándor
Belák1,*
Department of Virology, The National
Veterinary Institute, Biomedical Center, S-751 23 Uppsala,1 and Department of Small
Animals, The National Veterinary Institute, S-750 07 Uppsala,2 Sweden
Received 25 November 1998/Returned for modification 15 April
1999/Accepted 7 July 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
The genetic diversity of Aleutian mink disease virus (AMDV) was
examined. Sequences obtained from 35 clinical samples were compared
with five published sequences. An unusual, high genetic variability was
revealed. Three phylogenetic subgroups of AMDV were identified, and the
presence of more than one genotype at some farms was detected.
 |
TEXT |
Aleutian mink disease virus (AMDV)
is the causative agent of Aleutian disease (AD), which can affect all
breeds of wild and farmed mink. The virus is classified in the
Parvoviridae family and belongs to the subgroup of the
autonomously replicating parvoviruses. Several strains of AMDV, ranging
from nonvirulent to highly virulent, have been described previously and
classified either serologically or clinically (1, 3). The
clinical picture for adult minks is characterized by abnormalities of
the immune system. While the adult form is chronic and often fatal
(5), infected mink kits typically develop an acute and
lethal interstitial pneumonia (3, 9). The disease is common
in mink farms all over the world, causing high economic losses, and
therefore control programs are often applied. A drawback faced by AD
control is the frequent reappearance of AMDV on sanitized farms.
Information about the epizootiology and genetic diversity of AMDV is
relatively scarce. Previous reports were mainly focused on a few
isolates from different countries and periods (7, 10, 13).
In order to obtain a better overview of the genetic diversity of AMDV,
we have characterized a large number of field viruses obtained from
farmed animals in Sweden and Finland between 1995 and 1997. Here we
show that the viruses could be divided into three genetic subgroups and
that several genotypes of the virus may simultaneously occur on a farm.
Viruses and DNA extraction.
Thirty-five lymph node samples
were collected between 1995 and 1997 from 15 mink farms in Sweden (31 samples) and 3 farms in Finland (4 samples) having either AD-related
clinical problems or minks that tested positive in the
counterimmunoelectrophoresis assay, the standard diagnostic test for
AD. Strain ADV-G was obtained from E. Gottschalck (Institute for
Veterinary Microbiology, KVL, Frederiksberg, Denmark). DNA was
extracted from the cell culture supernatant (ADV-G) and from 10%
(wt/vol) lymph node homogenates in phosphate-buffered saline by
proteinase K digestion, phenol-chloroform extraction, and ethanol precipitation.
Primers and PCR.
Primers designed to amplify a 390-nucleotide
fragment of the gene for nonstructural protein 1 (NS1) of AMDV were
selected. The primers were AMDV1 (corresponding to positions 386 to 410 of the full-length genome of strain ADV-G [4]), AMDV2
(positions 563 to 586), and AMDV3 (positions 952 to 929). A seminested
PCR system was applied, with primers AMDV1 and AMDV3 in the first round
of amplification and primers AMDV2 and AMDV3 in the second step.
Sequencing and phylogenetic analysis.
Sequences of both
strands were determined by cycle sequencing with primers AMDV2 and
AMDV3. Sequence editing, alignments of the obtained sequences, and
construction of the trees were performed with the DNASTAR program
package (DNASTAR, Inc., Madison, Wis.). Five sequences were retrieved
from GenBank and included in the alignments. Phylogenetic trees and
nucleotide and amino acid similarities were obtained by using the Jotun
Hein algorithm. For phylogenetic analysis and bootstrapping, the PHYLIP
3.5 phylogenetic inference program (Felsenstein, 1989) was used.
A DNA fragment of the expected size was obtained from all isolates
investigated (Table 1) by the seminested
PCR, and 336 bp of the second PCR products was sequenced. An alignment
of these sequences with five sequences retrieved from GenBank (Fig.
1) showed a divergence that was unusually
high for parvoviruses, commonly known to be conserved (8, 11,
12). A previous report with only four different strains of AMDV
(7) had revealed up to 12% difference between nucleotide
sequences in the NS1 region. Indeed, the two most distantly related
samples in our comparison of 40 viruses, D1 and N2, showed a nucleotide
difference of almost 19% (Table 2).

View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Comparison of AMDV sequences from 35 field samples (A1
to R2) with five sequences from GenBank (ADV-G, ADV-K, ADV-SL3, United,
and Utah-1). The 336-bp region is located in the 5' part of the NS1
gene; the first nucleotide corresponds to position 382 of the NS1 gene
and position 587 of the AMDV genome (4). Filled circles
indicate nucleotide positions that differ in more than 10 sequences
from the majority and correspond to the first position of a codon. Open
squares indicate the same for the second position of a codon. Regions
of higher variability are shaded.
|
|
Phylogenetic trees based on nucleotide (data not shown) or deduced
amino acid (Fig. 2) sequences showed that
the 40 AMDVs could reliably be divided into three subgroups termed A,
B, and C (Fig. 3). Subgroup A consists
mostly of Swedish viruses from all regions investigated, as well as the
highly pathogenic United strain. Subgroup B is a mixed group with the
highly pathogenic Danish ADV-K strain, viruses from various Swedish
regions, and two viruses from Finland. Subgroup C includes two samples
from a Finnish farm, the nonpathogenic ADV-G strain, and the
intermediate ADV-SL3 strain, as well as the highly pathogenic Utah-1
strain. Since viruses differing considerably in virulence (ADV-G,
ADV-SL3, and Utah-1) belong to the same genetic subgroup, C (Fig. 3),
it was not possible to determine virulence markers at the genomic level.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Alignment of amino acid sequences deduced from the
nucleotide sequences shown in Fig. 1. Amino acids 1 to 112 correspond
to amino acids 128 to 239 of NS1 (4). Highly variable
regions similar to those in Fig. 1 are shaded.
|
|

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Phylogenetic tree obtained by the Jotun Hein algorithm
based on the 112-amino-acid residue sequences of the 5' part of the NS1
gene. The three genetic subgroups are designated A, B, and C. The scale
beneath the tree shows the diversity between the sequences. Units
indicate the numbers of substitution events.
|
|
When viruses from one given farm were compared, we found totally
identical sequences in one case (farm O), whereas viruses
in other
farms were very different (farms A, B, and D). The fact
that on one
hand viruses from one given farm can differ as much
as 16% at the
nucleotide level and 26% at the amino acid level
but on the other hand
can be totally identical in two animals
from another farm clearly shows
that this cannot be solely the
effect of virus evolution but rather
reflects the introduction
of more than one strain of AMDV into certain
farms. This data
is in accordance with a previous report stating the
isolation
of two viruses from one specimen (
6).
Unfortunately, since
the samples were collected within

in evolutionary
terms

a short
time, we cannot finally decide whether AMDV is rapidly
mutating
or is indeed an old virus, as concluded by Gottschalck and
others
(
7).
Preliminary attempts to correlate the severity of outbreaks on
different farms with the different virus clusters have been
difficult.
The reason for this is likely the presence of multiple
virus types on
some farms, and classification is further hampered
by the present
grouping of both virulent and nonvirulent strains
in the same genetic
cluster. It is anticipated that more extensive
analyses involving all
animals from a particular farm or animal
experiments with homogeneous
virus populations will shed more
light on this
issue.
Usually, due to the degeneracy of the nucleotide codons, variations at
the nucleotide level are not fully reflected at the
amino acid level.
However, when the sequence positions showing
nucleotide changes were
closely investigated, 33% were at positions
corresponding to the first
base of a codon, 23% were at positions
corresponding to the second
base, and 44% were at positions corresponding
to the third base. In
accordance with previous reports (
7,
14,
15), we demonstrate
here that parvoviruses and especially
AMDV even show a bias toward
amino acid substitutions. Consequently,
the alignment of the deduced
amino acid sequences (Fig.
2) showed
an even higher degree of
divergence than that at the nucleotide
level, up to 30% between the
two most distantly related sequences,
D1 and N2 (Table
2). Positions
showing first- and second-base
changes in more than 10 sequences, which
most likely lead to amino
acid changes, are clustered in four regions
of higher variability
(shaded in Fig.
1 and
2). However, some stretches
of amino acids
are completely conserved among all viruses examined
(Fig.
2, amino
acids 1 to 7 and 59 to 68), suggesting that some amino
acid motifs
have to be conserved in order to maintain structural or
functional
constraints but that otherwise the virus is free to mutate
within
certain limits. Only a few of the amino acid changes involved
nonconservative changes, and amino acids most likely to play key
roles
in structural or enzymatic functions are highly conserved
(Fig.
2).
The present work demonstrates that AMDV shows an unusually high genetic
diversity and that mutation of this virus is even
biased toward amino
acid changes. We further show that the viruses
can be separated into
three genetic subgroups and that viruses
from at least two different
subgroups can be present simultaneously
on a single farm. Rapid
diagnosis by PCR and the subsequent establishment
of phylogenetic
relationships as shown in this study will hopefully
contribute toward
the successful eradication of the disease by
enabling researchers to
trace the spread of the virus and by identifying
means of introduction
of the virus into susceptible
populations.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
GenBank accession
numbers for the sequences reported here are AF107626 to AF107660.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank E. Gottschalck (Institute for Veterinary Microbiology,
KVL, Frederiksberg, Denmark) for supplying the ADV-G strain and E. Smeds (Finnish Fur Breeder Association, Vasa, Finland) for the Finnish samples.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Virology, The National Veterinary Institute, Biomedical Center, Box
585, S-751 23, Uppsala, Sweden. Phone: 46 18 67 40 00. Fax: 46 18 471 45 20. E-mail: sandor.belak{at}svavir.uu.se.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Aasted, B.,
G. S. Tierney, and M. E. Bloom.
1984.
Analysis of the quantity of antiviral antibodies from mink infected with different Aleutian disease virus strains.
Scand. J. Immunol.
19:395-402[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Alexandersen, S.,
A. U. Jensen,
M. Hansen, and B. Aasted.
1985.
Experimental transmission of Aleutian disease virus (ADV) to different animal species.
Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Immunol. Scand. Sect. B
93:195-200[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Alexandersen, S.,
S. Larsen,
B. Aasted,
A. Uttenthal,
M. E. Bloom, and M. Hansen.
1994.
Acute interstitial pneumonia in mink kits inoculated with defined isolates of Aleutian mink disease parvovirus.
Vet. Pathol.
31:216-228[Abstract].
|
| 4.
|
Bloom, M. E.,
S. Alexandersen,
S. Perryman,
D. Lechner, and J. B. Wolfinbarger.
1988.
Nucleotide sequence and genomic organization of Aleutian mink disease parvovirus (ADV): sequence comparisons between a nonpathogenic and a pathogenic strain of ADV.
J. Virol.
62:2903-2915[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Bloom, M. E.,
H. Kanno,
S. Mori, and J. B. Wolfinbarger.
1994.
Aleutian mink disease: puzzles and paradigms.
Infect. Agents Dis.
3:279-301[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Gottschalck, E.,
S. Alexandersen,
A. Cohn,
L. A. Poulsen,
M. E. Bloom, and B. Aasted.
1991.
Nucleotide sequence analysis of Aleutian mink disease parvovirus shows that multiple virus types are present in infected mink.
J. Virol.
65:4378-4386[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Gottschalck, E.,
S. Alexandersen,
T. Storgaard,
M. E. Bloom, and B. Aasted.
1994.
Sequence comparison of the non-structural genes of four different types of Aleutian mink disease parvovirus indicates an unusual degree of variability.
Arch. Virol.
138:213-231[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Hemauer, A.,
A. von Poblotzki,
A. Gigler,
P. Cassinotti,
G. Siegl,
H. Wolf, and S. Modrow.
1996.
Sequence variability among different parvovirus B19 isolates.
J. Gen. Virol.
77:1781-1785[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Larsen, S.,
S. Alexandersen,
E. Lund,
P. Have, and M. Hansen.
1984.
Acute interstitial pneumonitis caused by Aleutian disease virus in mink kits.
Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Immunol. Scand. Sect. A
92:391-393[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Oie, K. L.,
G. Durrant,
J. B. Wolfinbarger,
D. Martin,
F. Costello,
S. Perryman,
D. Hogan,
W. J. Hadlow, and M. E. Bloom.
1996.
The relationship between capsid protein (VP2) sequence and pathogenicity of Aleutian mink disease parvovirus (ADV): a possible role for raccoons in the transmission of ADV infections.
J. Virol.
70:852-861[Abstract].
|
| 11.
|
Parrish, C. R.,
C. F. Aquadro, and L. E. Carmichael.
1988.
Canine host range and a specific epitope map along with variant sequences in the capsid protein gene of canine parvovirus and related feline, mink, and raccoon parvoviruses.
Virology
166:293-307[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Parrish, C. R.
1995.
Molecular epidemiology of parvoviruses.
Semin. Virol.
6:415-418.
|
| 13.
|
Schuierer, S.,
M. E. Bloom,
O. R. Kaaden, and U. Truyen.
1997.
Sequence analysis of the lymphotropic Aleutian disease parvovirus ADV-SL3.
Arch. Virol.
142:157-166[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Truyen, U.,
A. Gruenberg,
S. F. Chang,
B. Obermaier,
P. Veijalainen, and C. R. Parrish.
1995.
Evolution of the feline-subgroup parvoviruses and the control of canine host range in vivo.
J. Virol.
69:4702-4710[Abstract].
|
| 15.
|
Truyen, U., and C. R. Parrish.
1995.
The evolution and control of parvovirus host ranges.
Semin. Virol.
6:311-317.
|
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, December 1999, p. 4145-4149, Vol. 37, No. 12
0095-1137/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Knuuttila, A., Aronen, P., Saarinen, A., Vapalahti, O.
(2009). Development and Evaluation of an Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Based on Recombinant VP2 Capsids for the Detection of Antibodies to Aleutian Mink Disease Virus. CVI
16: 1360-1365
[Abstract]
[Full Text]