Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, February 1999, p. 380-385, Vol. 37, No. 2
0095-1137/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis Is More Efficient than
Ribotyping and Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Analysis in
Discrimination of Pasteurella haemolytica Strains
Angeli
Kodjo,1,*
Laurence
Villard,1
Chantal
Bizet,2
Jean-Louis
Martel,3
Richard
Sanchis,4
Evelyne
Borges,1
Dominique
Gauthier,5
Françoise
Maurin,1 and
Yves
Richard1
Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de
Lyon, F-69280 Marcy l'Etoile,1
Collection Institut Pasteur BP 52, F-75724 Paris Cedex
15,2
CNEVA-Lyon, F-69342 Lyon cedex
07,3
CNEVA-Sophia Antipolis, F-06902
Sophia Antipolis Cedex,4 and
Laboratoire Départemental d'Analyses, F-73000
Chambery,5 France
Received 26 May 1998/Returned for modification 7 August
1998/Accepted 14 October 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
One hundred thirty-three strains of Pasteurella
haemolytica of both biotypes (90 and 43 strains of biotypes A and
T, respectively) and almost all the serotypes were subjected to
ribotyping, random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis, and
pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) analysis for epidemiological
purposes. A total of 15 patterns recorded as ribotypes HA to HO were
found for the P. haemolytica biotype A strains, with
ribotypes HA, HC, and HD being encountered most often (66 strains
[74%]); and 20 ribotypes, designated HA' to HT', that were clearly
distinct from those observed for biotype A strains were observed for
strains of biotype T. RAPD analysis generated a total of 44 (designated Rp1 to Rp44) and 15 (designated Rp1' to Rp 15') unique RAPD patterns for biogroup A and biogroup T, respectively. Analysis of the data indicated that a given combined ribotype-RAPD pattern could be observed
for biotype A strains of different serotypes, whatever the zoological
or geographic origin, whereas this was not the case for biotype T
strains. PFGE appeared to be more efficient in strain discrimination
since selected strains from various zoological or geographical origins
harboring the same ribotype-RAPD group were further separated into
unique entities.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Pasteurella haemolytica
is a well-known pathogen of ruminants worldwide (10, 17,
23). Two biochemical types of this bacterial species are
recognized and are designated biotypes A and T; the letters stand for
arabinose or trehalose fermentation, respectively (1, 16).
Another approach to the typing of strains of P. haemolytica
is based upon serological properties, primarily an indirect
hemagglutination assay with P. haemolytica capsular antigens. A total of 17 serotypes are now defined for the species (8, 26). Thus, each isolate of P. haemolytica is
designated by a combination of its biotype and its serotype. In cattle,
pasteurellosis mostly involves P. haemolytica A1 (10,
15, 17), whereas P. haemolytica A2, T3, T4, and T10
are responsible for ovine systemic pasteurellosis of feeding lambs
(11, 19-21) or wild ruminants (18). In some
instance, strains belonging to the same serotype have been found in
various animal hosts, i.e., serotype A1 in bovine, ovine, or caprine
hosts (15, 21) or T3 in wild ruminants such as chamois
(Rupicapra rupicapra), and in ovine or caprine hosts
(8, 9, 18, 20, 21, 23). On the basis of serotyping, these
observations could suggest a zoological interspecies distribution of
P. haemolytica, as found by Callan et al. (4).
Recently, rRNA gene restriction analysis (ribotyping) and random
amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis of strains of P. haemolytica have confirmed the distribution of specific clones (an
intraspecific clonal distribution) in bovine or captive bighorn sheep
herds (2, 5, 23). The purpose of the present study was an
extensive epidemiological study of P. haemolytica strains
isolated from various hosts in different geographic areas by ribotyping
and RAPD analysis and comparison of the types obtained with those obtained by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) analysis.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Bacterial strains, growth conditions, and species
confirmation.
The strains investigated in the present study are
listed in Table 1. The study included a total of 133 P. haemolytica strains of the two biotypes (90 and 43 strains of
biotypes A and T, respectively) and strains of almost all serotypes of
the two biotypes, including the type strain CIP 103286. These strains
were isolated in France, Hungary, the United Kingdom, or Sweden.
Additionally, the type strains Pasteurella multocida subsp.
multocida CIP 103286 and Citrobacter koseri CIP
105177 (kindly provided by F. Grimont, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France)
were used as controls. For routine use, the strains were grown at
36°C on brain heart infusion agar plates (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany)
supplemented with 5% defibrinated sheep blood (Biomérieux, Marcy
l'Etoile, France). Bacterial species identification or confirmation
was assessed by observation of the colonial morphology and the Gram
staining results, by oxidase and catalase reactions, and by a
standardized micromethod performed with the 20NE API-Biomérieux
system (API-Biomérieux).
rRNA gene restriction analysis (ribotyping). (i) Enzymatic DNA
restriction.
Bacterial genomic DNA treated with 50 µg of RNase
(Merck) per ml was extracted and purified as described elsewhere
(14), and 5 µg of total DNA was cleaved with 10 U of
HindIII at 37°C for 4 h. Digestion was performed
with half of the quantity of enzyme for 2 h, followed by the
addition of the second half for a further 2 h.
HindIII was selected on the basis of the information in
the literature (5) and on the basis of preliminary
experiments in which this enzyme gave sharp bands in terms of complete
digestion as well as in terms of the number and/or distribution of the
rRNA gene restriction patterns. The reaction was stopped by heating at
65°C for 10 min before separation of DNA restriction fragments on an
0.8% (wt/vol) agarose gel (SeaKem LE; FMC BioProducts, Rockland, Maine) in 1× TAE buffer (40 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA [pH 8, adjusted with
glacial acetic acid]) for 16 h at 40 V.
(ii) Southern blotting.
DNA fragments were transferred to a
neutral nylon membrane (MagnaGraph nylon membrane; Micron Separation
Inc., Westboro, Mass.) with the Trans-Vac TE 80 vacuum blotter
apparatus (Hoefer Scientific Instruments, San Francisco, Calif.), with
20× SSC (3 M NaCl plus 0.3 M sodium citrate [pH 7.0]) used as the
transfer solution. The transferred DNA fragments were immobilized onto
the membrane by UV cross-linking at 0.120 J/cm2 with the
Fluo-Link apparatus (Bioblock, Illkirch, France).
(iii) Prehybridization and hybridization conditions.
Prehybridization was carried out in rolling tubes containing 50 ml of
prehybridization fluid (2× SSC, 0.1% Ficoll, 0.1%
polyvinylpyrrolidone, 0.1% glycine, 1 mg of heat-denatured salmon
sperm DNA per ml) at 62.5°C for 2 h, followed by 16 h of
hybridization at 62.5°C with 500 ng of heat-denatured
acetylaminofluorene-labelled Escherichia coli 16S plus 23S
rRNA per ml (the complete kit for hybridization and detection was
purchased from Eurogentec, Seraing, Belgium) in 10 ml of hybridization
fluid (2× SSC, 0.02% Ficoll, 0.02% polyvinylpyrrolidone, 0.02%
glycine, 25 mM KH2PO4 [pH 8.0], 2 mM EDTA,
0.5% sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS], 10% PEG 6000, 100 µg of
heat-denatured salmon sperm DNA per ml). Washings and immunoenzymatic
detection of hybrids were performed as recommended by the manufacturer.
(iv) DNA fragment size determination.
Images of the blots
were captured on video for computer determination of the fragment sizes
with the Taxotron program (Institut Pasteur, Paris, France). The
molecular sizes of the different fragments were determined by
interpolation from the sizes generated from Citrobacter
koseri rRNA gene restriction fragments.
RAPD analysis.
For RAPD analysis, 0.25 µM a single
arbitrary 10-mer RAPD primer (sequence, AACGCGCAAC) and 5 µl of 10 ng of diluted DNA of each strain per ml were added to a
ready-to-use bead (Ready.to.go RAPD Analysis Beads [Pharmacia Biotech,
Uppsala, Sweden]) containing AmpliTaq plus the Stoffel fragment (a
highly thermostable recombinant DNA polymerase which lacks any
intrinsic 5'-3' exonuclease activity and which exhibits optimal
activity over a broader range of magnesium concentrations), each
deoxynucleoside triphosphate at a concentration of 0.4 mM, 3 mM
MgCl2, 30 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris (pH 8.3), and 2.5 µg of
bovine serum albumin in a 25-µl final reaction volume. RAPD amplification reactions were performed in the Progene thermal cycler
apparatus (Techne, Cambridge, United Kingdom) with the following
conditions: 1 cycle at 95°C for 5 min, followed by 45 cycles at
95°C for 1 min, 36°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 2 min. RAPD products
were resolved by electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel in
Tris-borate-EDTA (TBE) buffer at 3.5 V/cm for 3 h. The reaction
conditions and the reproducibilities of the patterns were optimized by
performing preliminary experiments in which six primers were evaluated.
E. coli C1a DNA (provided in the Ready.to.go RAPD Analysis
Beads kit) was used as a control and a molecular weight marker.
PFGE.
The relationships of the strains analyzed by
ribotyping and RAPD analysis were independently evaluated by computer
analysis. Among those with consistent positions, certain strains were
chosen on the basis of zoological or geographical criteria for more
extensive analysis by macrorestriction analysis by PFGE. Thus, 113 representative genomic DNAs of strains of P. haemolytica (80 strains of biotype A and 33 strains of biotype T)
were prepared in 1% low-melting-temperature agarose (SeaPlaque GTG
agarose; FMC BioProducts) plugs by a slight modification of the method
described by Talon et al. (25). The DNA samples were
digested in gel overnight at 37°C in 300 µl of the appropriate
restriction buffer containing 10 U of SalI endonuclease (Eurogentec). Reaction conditions with SalI were optimized
by performing preliminary experiments in which the rarely cutting enzymes SpeI, XbaI, and NotI were also
evaluated. The digested DNAs were separated by PFGE in a
contour-clamped homogeneous electric field with the CHEF DRIII
apparatus (Bio-Rad, Richmond, Calif.). Samples were loaded in 1%
molecular biology-grade agarose (FastLane; BioProducts) that had been
dissolved in 0.5× TBE buffer and were run in the same buffer at 150 V
at 10°C with pulse times of 20 s for 12 h and then 5 to
17 s for 17 h. The gels were stained in 1 µg of ethidium
bromide per ml for 30 min and photographed on a UV transilluminator.
DNA fragment sizes were determined with a computer with Taxotron
software by interpolation from the sizes of bacteriophage lambda marker
I (Boehringer, Mannheim, Germany), which was used as a molecular size standard.
Data acquisition and analysis.
For computer database
editing, each strain was given a pattern designation according to the
patterns generated by the three methods tested.
 |
RESULTS |
Bacterial species identification or confirmation.
After
24 h of aerobic incubation at 37°C, colonies of approximately 2 mm in diameter were smooth, shiny, and nontransparent with a grayish
tinge. All strains presumed to belong to the species P. haemolytica were gram negative and nonmotile and produced oxidase, catalase, and acid by fermentation of glucose. Complete identification as P. haemolytica was assessed with the 20NE system
database (API-Biomérieux).
Ribotyping.
Each unique rRNA gene (rDNA) restriction pattern
obtained after digestion with HindIII was designated a
ribotype. A total of 15 patterns recorded as ribotypes HA to HO were
found for the P. haemolytica biotype A strains, with
ribotypes HA, HC, and HD being encountered the most often: 44 (49%),
15 (17%), and 7 (8%) strains, respectively. Ribotype HA yielded the
13 DNA fragments with computer-estimated sizes of 20,609, 16,177, 9,174, 7,622, 6,190, 3,853, 2,906, 2,550, 2,130, 1,483, 1,262, 1,184,
and 918 bp. Furthermore, these three ribotypes were nearly identical, with differences based upon the lack of the 2,130-bp fragment for
ribotype HC but the presence of that fragment for ribotype HA or the
displacement of the 2,550-bp fragment in ribotype HA for the 2,690 bp
fragment in ribotype HD (Fig. 1A). The
association of serotypes and ribotypes showed that all the bovine
strains which belonged to serotype A1 were regrouped in ribotype
HA, an almost homogeneous cluster, in contrast to serotype
A2 strains, which were more heterogeneous. Despite this heterogeneity,
the same ribotype could be observed for strains belonging to different serotypes, whatever their zoological or geographical origins. For
example, ribotype HA was recognized in isolates recovered from bovine,
ovine, or caprine species in France, Hungary, Sweden, or the United
Kingdom. Similar results were also observed in terms of the ribotype HC
distribution, which was common to biotype A isolates of P. haemolytica from chamois, ovine, or caprine species of various
origins (Table 1). The
patterns for strains belonging to biotype T of P. haemolytica were distributed among 20 ribotypes, designated HA' to
HT', because all these patterns were clearly distinct from those
observed for biotype A. Among this group of organisms, isolates of each
of the three serotypes included in the study had distinct ribotypes,
with no cross ribotypes from one serotype to another. Ribotype HA' was
the major pattern observed among strains of serotype T3 (6 of 14 strains). Compared to the other patterns, a clear-cut distinction was
observed between ribotype HA' and the other ribotypes recorded for
isolates of this serogroup of Pasteurella. Results obtained
for serogroup T4 showed that the three ribotypes HH', HI', and HJ' were
the most representative (Table 1). Furthermore, these three ribotypes,
which regrouped 17 of the 22 strains, were nearly identical and were
distinguished only by the presence or the lack of one or two internal
fragments (Fig. 1B). In contrast to biogroup A, cross ribotypes between strains from one animal host to another or from one geographical area
to another were not found within the biogroup T strains of P. haemolytica studied.

View larger version (95K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Results obtained by ribotyping, RAPD analysis, and PFGE
of representative P. haemolytica strains. The results
obtained by each method are presented from left to right in the three
panels of A and B, respectively. (A) Representative strains of
P. haemolytica biotype A. Lanes 2 to 14, strains 1908, 1924, 2439, 2961, 41/94, 78s, 64, 75, 141, 172, 3/94, 9/94, and 10/95,
respectively. (B) Representative strains of P. haemolytica biotype T. Lanes 2 to 14, strains 1205P, 1205T, 1231P,
1229T, CIP 104865, CIP 104866, CIP 104864, 3P, 3T, 4N, CIP 104867, CIP
104869, and CIP 104870, respectively. The following molecular size
markers were used in lane 1 of each panel: for ribotyping,
MluI-digested DNA of C. koseri CIP 105177; for
RAPD analysis, fragments of E. coli Ca1 DNA; and for PFGE,
bacteriophage lambda ladder I.
|
|
RAPD analysis.
RAPD analysis of the P. haemolytica strains included in the study generated a total of 44 (designated Rp1 to Rp44) and 15 (designated Rp1' to Rp 15') unique RAPD
patterns for biogroup A and biogroup T, respectively. Again, as
observed by ribotyping analysis, biotype A and biotype T strains
clustered distinctively, and cross patterns were not found. Use of the
combination of the ribotype and the RAPD analysis patterns further
subclustered strains belonging to both biotypes into subgroups within a
given ribotype, with each subgroup comprising 2 to 12 strains, along
with strains presenting a unique double pattern. Thus, a total of 20 and 8 subgroups (except those containing a single strain) were
recognized for P. haemolytica biotype A and biotype T,
respectively, with 12 subgroups found in the single ribotype HA, in
which RAPD analysis patterns Rp1 and Rp2 were the most frequently
observed. In some instances, for the group of P. haemolytica biotype A organisms harboring the same ribotype and
serotype, strains originating from different ruminant hosts recovered
from separate geographical areas could even be subclustered because
they had the same RAPD patterns. As listed in Table 1, French ovine
(strains 126 and 68s) or bovine (strains 2965 and 3179) isolates were
found to have the HA-Rp2 combination pattern; Hungarian caprine (strain 41/94), French bovine (strain 1619), or French ovine (strains 78s,
100s) isolates were in the HA-Rp3 subgroup; Hungarian caprine (strain
1/96) and Swedish ovine (strain CCUG 408) isolates were in the HA-Rp10
subgroup; and finally, Hungarian ovine (strain 1/94) and French ovine
(strain 258s) isolates were in the HN-Rp42 subgroup. For each of these
last subgroups, strains belonged to the same given A serotype. In most
instances, ribotyping combined with RAPD analysis clearly separated
each isolate in serotype A except in one case, in which an HB-Rp6
profile was found for both serotype A1 and A2 strains, strains 64 and
75 (serotype A1) and strain 73 (serotype A2). Although this scheme of
subdifferentiation could also be observed for the biogroup T strains, a
cross ribotype-RAPD analysis combination pattern was not found between
ovine and chamois isolates or between strains belonging to two distinct serotypes.
PFGE.
Analysis of strains or groups of strains of
P. haemolytica by PFGE gave a higher level of strain
discrimination. Again, biotype A and biotype T strains of P. haemolytica clustered separately. The PFGE patterns were given the
designations P1 to P69 and P1' to P26' for P. haemolytica biotype A and biotype T strains, respectively (Table
1). For the majority of groups determined to be concordant according to
their RAPD analysis and ribotype profiles, further analysis by PFGE
revealed residual heterogeneity. For eight and three groups (biotype A
and T, respectively), however, the homogeneity of the group was
essentially maintained even by PFGE (Table 1). For all other groups,
concordant ribotype and RAPD analysis clusters were further subdivided
into many other PFGE subgroups, with most subgroups comprising a single
strain. Furthermore, strains or groups of strains appeared to be
distinct with regard to their zoological or geographical origins (Fig.
1).
 |
DISCUSSION |
DNA-based typing schemes such as ribotyping, 16S-23S intergenic
region amplification, RAPD analysis, and multilocus enzyme electrophoresis have been found to be preferable to the phenotyping strategies for the typing of P. haemolytica (2, 5,
6, 23). Most of the data from the previous studies have shown a close relationship between different P. haemolytica
strains, particularly within a given serotype of biotype A. Furthermore, on the basis of ribotyping and RAPD analysis, the
hypothesis of a clonal dissemination of a given strain between
different bovine herds in France has been advanced, since all bovine
P. haemolytica strains belonging to the A1 serotype
appeared to be genetically identical or almost identical by both
methods (5). The present investigation was conducted with
strains of various origins, including most of the bovine strains from
the previous study (5), in order to further scrutinize their
genetic relationships. Because PFGE has proven to be the most efficient
subtyping method for many other bacterial genera and species such as
Aeromonas (25), Legionella
(3), Pseudomonas (24), and
Yersinia (13), it has been chosen as an
additional epidemiological tool for evaluation of the efficiency of
both ribotyping and RAPD analysis, a strategy which may additionally confirm or deny the hypothesis of clonal dissemination. On the basis of
the data obtained from the present study, the conclusion that strains
of biotype A of P. haemolytica have a close genetic relationship can also be made from the ribotyping analysis alone, since
a given ribotype pattern was observed for strains of several distinct A
serotypes, even strains from different hosts in various geographical
areas: see, for example the pattern for serotype A1 Hungarian caprine
strain 41/94 versus those for serotype A1 French ovine strain 78s and
A2 Swedish ovine strain CCUG 408 versus that for serotype A2 Hungarian
caprine strain 1/96, which shared a common ribotype (ribotype HA). In
some instances, some strains belonging to serotypes A1 and A2 also
appeared to be identical by RAPD analysis (see, for example, the
results for strains 64, 75, and 73). In contrast, the results from PFGE
analysis indicated that a given common clone of P. haemolytica organisms was never observed by this method for
isolates from two different hosts or for isolates from different
locations. Moreover, the results obtained by this method lead to the
conclusion that most of the strains recovered from cattle appeared to
be unique with regard to their PFGE types (pulsotypes).
From a more fundamental point of view, the variations in the PFGE
patterns observed after passage through different hosts or after in
vitro passages may indicate some genomic plasticity in a given species.
These modifications may have occurred either in vitro, after isolation
of the bacteria, or in vivo, under the selective pressure exerted by
the host. This macrorestriction polymorphism plasticity has been
described in some other bacterial species such as Pseudomonas
aeruginosa (24) and Yersinia pestis (12). In the case of P. aeruginosa, the
persistence of a given strain in its host for several months resulted
in up to 20% genomic divergence (24). In Y. pestis, PFGE restriction analysis has recently demonstrated a high
degree of instability of a given strain after in vitro cultivation,
with differences between profiles being based not only on one or two
bands but also involving numerous restriction fragments of various
sizes (12). To verify whether such an event could also occur
in P. haemolytica and could account for the slight
differences observed between the pulsotypes of strains with the same
combination pattern by ribotyping-RAPD analysis, bovine strains 2439 and 2961 (HA-Rp1 group) and Hungarian caprine strain 41/94 and French
ovine strain 78s (HA-Rp3 group) were subcultured on blood agar plates,
and five randomly picked colonies of each strain were subjected to PFGE
as indicated above. The selected colonies yielded a constant and stable
PFGE pattern for each of the four strains analyzed (data not shown),
indicating an in vitro stability of the pulsotypes of P. haemolytica. Similar results were obtained by other workers with
other bacterial species such as Legionella pneumophila
(3) and Yersinia enterocolitica (13). Despite multiple subcultures or prolonged passage on artificial culture
medium, the pulsotypes of these species also remained stable in vitro,
while a high degree of genomic diversity was observed among strains of
different origins. Of course, this analysis does not definitely rule
out the possibility of some genomic rearrangements at a low frequency
in P. haemolytica, particularly in the animal host, but
it strengthens our results and demonstrates that PFGE is the most
meaningful tool for the subtyping of this species and thereby provides
evidence and confirms unequivocally the differences observed between
ribotyping (and/or RAPD analysis) and PFGE analysis. Thus, analysis of
all the data from this study does not support the conclusion that there
is a high degree of relatedness among biotype A strains because PFGE
can further distinguish the strains of P. haemolytica
with a common ribotype-RAPD analysis pattern, rendering PFGE useful for
epidemiological tracing. In addition, these results raise the question
of what should be considered a P. haemolytica clone and
a bacterial clone in general. The present study suggests that clades or
clusters are suitable designations for ribogroups or RAPD analysis
groups, and the term clone should be kept for the pulsogroups. Be that
as it may, one can conclude that ribotyping even in association with
RAPD analysis is not efficient in differentiating strains of
P. haemolytica, since PFGE has proven to be the
ultimate tool for distinguishing isolates of this species. Elsewhere,
the present data are in total agreement with previous findings (7,
22) and clearly separate the two biotypes of P. haemolytica into two separate species, for which the names
P. haemolytica and P. trehalosi have
been proposed for biotypes A and T, respectively (22).
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
Thanks are due to E. Falsen and F. Grimont for kindly providing
some bacterial strains. We thank Timothy Greenland (Laboratoire d'Immunologie et de Biologie Pulmonaire, Hôpital Louis Pradel, Lyon, France) for discussion and help in preparing the manuscript.
This work was supported by grants from the Office National de la Chasse
(ONC) and the "SP2" Soutien de Programme of the Ministère de
l'Agriculture et de la Pêche of France.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Ecole Nationale
Vétérinaire de Lyon, BP 83, 1 Av. Bourgelat, F-69280 Marcy
l'Etoile, France. Phone: 33 4 78 87 25 55. Fax: 33 4 78 87 25 94. E-mail: a.kodjo{at}vet-lyon.fr.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Adlam, C.
1989.
The structure, function and properties of cellular and extracellular components of Pasteurella haemolytica, p. 75-92.
In
C. Adlam, and J. M. Rutter (ed.), Pasteurella and pasteurellosis. Academic Press, London, United Kingdom.
|
| 2.
|
Angen, O.,
D. A. Caugant,
J. E. Olsen, and M. Bisgaard.
1997.
Genotypic relationships among strains classified under the (Pasteurella) haemolytica-complex as indicated by ribotyping and multilocus enzyme electrophoresis.
Zentbl. Bakteriol.-Int. J. Med. Microbiol.
286:333-354.
|
| 3.
|
Brender, L.,
M. Ott, and J. Hacker.
1990.
Genome analysis of Legionella pneumophila ssp. by orthogonal field alternation gel electrophoresis (OFAGE).
FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
72:253-258.
|
| 4.
|
Callan, R. J.,
T. D. Bunch,
G. W. Workman, and R. E. Mock.
1991.
Development of pneumonia in desert bighorn sheep after exposure to a flock of exotic wild and domestic sheep.
J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc.
198:1052-1056[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Chaslus-Dancla, E.,
M. C. Lessage-Descauses,
S. Leroy-Sétrin,
J. L. Martel,
P. Coudert, and J. P. Laffont.
1996.
Validation of random amplified polymorphic DNA assays by ribotyping as tools for epidemiological surveys of Pasteurella from animals.
Vet. Microbiol.
52:91-102[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Davies, R. L.,
S. Arkinsaw, and R. K. Selander.
1997.
Evolutionary genetics of Pasteurella haemolytica isolates recovered from cattle and sheep.
Infect. Imm.
65:3585-3593[Abstract].
|
| 7.
|
Davies, R. L.,
B. J. Paster, and F. E. Dewhirst.
1996.
Phylogenetic relationships and diversity within the Pasteurella haemolytica complex based on 16S rRNA sequence comparison and outer membrane protein and lipopolysaccharide analysis.
Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.
46:736-744[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Fodor, L.,
Z. Penzes, and J. Varga.
1996.
Coagglutination test for serotyping Pasteurella haemolytica.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
34:393-397[Abstract].
|
| 9.
|
Foreyt, W. J.,
R. M. Silflow, and J. E. Lagerquist.
1996.
Susceptibility of Dall sheep (Ovis dalli dalli) to pneumonia caused by Pasteurella haemolytica.
J. Wildl. Dis.
32:586-593[Abstract].
|
| 10.
|
Franck, G. H.
1989.
Pasteurellosis in cattle, p. 197-222.
In
C. Adlam, and J. M. Rutter (ed.), Pasteurella and pasteurellosis. Academic Press, London, United Kingdom.
|
| 11.
|
Gilmour, N. J. L., and J. S. Gilmour.
1898.
Pasteurellosis of sheep, p. 223-262.
In
C. Adlam, and J. M. Rutter (ed.), Pasteurella and pasteurellosis. Academic Press, London, United Kingdom.
|
| 12.
|
Guiyoule, A.,
F. Grimont,
I. Iteman,
P. A. D. Grimont,
A. Amouroux, and E. Carniel.
1994.
Plague pandemies investigated by ribotyping of Yersinia pestis strains.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
32:634-641[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Hristo, N.,
I. Iteman, and E. Carniel.
1994.
Efficient subtyping of pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica strains by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
32:2913-2920[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Kodjo, A.,
Y. Richard, and T. Tonjum.
1997.
Moraxella boevrei sp. nov., a new Moraxella species found in goats.
Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.
47:115-121[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Martel, J. L., and S. Richard.
1995.
Frequence of Pasteurella haemolytica serotypes isolated from bovine in France. Communication.
In
Presented at the "La Vaccination en Buiatrie," International Congress of the French Society of Buiatry. French Society of Buiatry, Paris, France.
|
| 16.
|
Mutters, R.,
W. Mannheim, and M. Bisgaard.
1989.
Taxonomy of the group, p. 3-34.
In
C. Adlam, and J. M. Rutter (ed.), Pasteurella and pasteurellosis. Academic Press, London, United Kingdom.
|
| 17.
|
Odendaal, M. W., and M. M. Henton.
1995.
The distribution of Pasteurella haemolytica serotypes among cattle, sheep, and goats in South Africa and their association with disease.
Onderstepoort J. Vet. Res.
62:223-226[Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Richard, Y.,
E. Borges,
D. Gauthier,
C. Favier,
R. Sanchis, and J. Oudar.
1992.
Isolement de 33 souches de Pasteurella béta hémolytiques chez le chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra).
Gibier Faune Sauvage
9:71-85.
|
| 19.
|
Richard, Y.,
N. Menouri,
F. Guigen,
C. Favier,
E. Borges,
M. Fontaine,
J. Oudar,
J. Brunet, and C. Pailhac.
1986.
Pneumopathies de l'agneau de bergerie. Etude bactériologique sur des poumons prélevés à l'abattoir.
Rev. Med. Vet.
137:671-680.
|
| 20.
|
Sanchis, R.,
G. Abadie, and G. Polveroni.
1988.
Typage de Pasteurella haemolytica. Etude de 115 souches isolées chez les petits ruminants.
Rec. Med. Vet.
165:129-133.
|
| 21.
|
Sanchis, R.,
P. Guerrault,
G. Abadie, and P. M. Pellet.
1991.
Fréquence d'isolement des sérotypes de Pasteurella haemolytica chez les ovins et les caprins. Etude de 230 souches.
Rev. Med. Vet.
142:201-205.
|
| 22.
|
Sneath, P. H. A., and M. Stevens.
1990.
Actinobacillus rossii sp. nov., Actinobacillus seminis sp. nov., nom. rev., Pasteurella bettii sp. nov., Pasteurella lymphangitidis sp. nov., Pasteurella mairi sp. nov., and Pasteurella trehalosi sp. nov.
Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.
40:148-153[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Snipes, K. P.,
R. W. Kasten,
M. A. Wild,
M. W. Miller,
D. A. Jessup,
R. L. Silflow,
W. J. Foreyt, and T. E. Carpenter.
1992.
Using ribosomal RNA gene restriction patterns in distinguishing isolates of Pasteurella haemolytica from bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis).
J. Wildl. Dis.
28:347-354[Abstract].
|
| 24.
|
Struelens, M. J.,
V. Schwam,
A. Deplano, and D. Baran.
1993.
Genome macrorestriction analysis of diversity and variability of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains infecting cystic fibrosis patients.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
31:2320-2326[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Talon, D.,
M. J. Dupont,
J. Lesne,
M. Thouverez, and Y. Michelbriand.
1996.
Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis as an epidemiological tool for clonal identification of Aeromonas hydrophila.
J. Appl. Bacteriol.
80:277-282[Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Younan, M., and L. Fodor.
1995.
Characterization of a new Pasteurella haemolytica (A17).
Res. Vet. Sci.
58:98[Medline].
|
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, February 1999, p. 380-385, Vol. 37, No. 2
0095-1137/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Mbwana, J., Bolin, I., Lyamuya, E., Mhalu, F., Lagergard, T.
(2006). Molecular Characterization of Haemophilus ducreyi Isolates from Different Geographical Locations. J. Clin. Microbiol.
44: 132-137
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Connor, K. M., Quirie, M. M., Baird, G., Donachie, W.
(2000). Characterization of United Kingdom Isolates of Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis Using Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis. J. Clin. Microbiol.
38: 2633-2637
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Boerlin, P., Siegrist, H. H., Burnens, A. P., Kuhnert, P., Mendez, P., Prétat, G., Lienhard, R., Nicolet, J.
(2000). Molecular Identification and Epidemiological Tracing of Pasteurella multocida Meningitis in a Baby. J. Clin. Microbiol.
38: 1235-1237
[Abstract]
[Full Text]