Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, February 1999, p. 430-432, Vol. 37, No. 2
0095-1137/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Performance Characteristics of an Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent
Assay for Determining Salivary Immunoglobulin G Response to
Helicobacter pylori
R.
De
Pascalis,1,*
M.
Del
Pezzo,1
G.
Nardone,2
G.
Budillon,2 and
A.
Lavitola1
Cattedra di Microbiologia Clinica,
Dipartimento di Biologia e Patologia Cellulare e
Molecolare,1 and
Cattedra di
Gastroenterologia, Dipartimento di Patologia
Sistematica,2 Universita' degli Studi di
Napoli "Federico II," 80131 Naples, Italy
Received 5 August 1998/Returned for modification 15 September
1998/Accepted 2 November 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
We evaluated the salivary immunoglobulin G (IgG) immune response to
Helicobacter pylori in 70 subjects by enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Subjects with a positive H. pylori culture showed significantly higher titers of antibodies
than subjects with no detectable H. pylori: the
overall sensitivity and specificity of the test were 84 and 90%,
respectively. The detection of salivary anti-H. pylori
IgG antibodies may be considered as an alternative to serum IgG
detection for ease of sample collection or when blood samples are not
available in screening of patients with dyspepsia.
 |
TEXT |
An association between colonization
of the gastric mucosa with Helicobacter pylori and peptic
ulcer, chronic gastritis, and gastric carcinoma has been clearly
established (5, 15, 16, 19, 20). The high prevalence of
H. pylori, arguably the most common cause of chronic
bacterial infection in humans (infecting 40 and 80% of individuals in
developed and developing countries, respectively) (18, 19),
demands the development of a noninvasive, sensitive, economic,
and rapid technique of screening to detect infection. The current
accepted diagnostic procedures for H. pylori infection
include staining of histological samples, culturing of biopsy
specimens, and the [13C]urea/[14C]urea
breath test (2, 10, 11). The first two methods require invasive procedures and are therefore performed only for symptomatic subjects. The urea breath test, while not invasive, may be limited by
its cost or the use of radiolabeled compounds (1). Although all strains of H. pylori cause some degree of
persistent inflammation, the majority of people have no symptoms and a
large number of infections may go undiagnosed (3, 4, 7, 17, 31,
33). Serological tests are available to evaluate total
H. pylori-specific or H. pylori
strain-specific antibodies (6, 12, 23, 26, 27, 32, 34),
which could assist physicians in both diagnosis and follow-up of
infected patients. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is the
most common commercial test whose performance is overall more accurate
than that of latex agglutination or immunochromatography (27). Commercial Western blotting kits have recently been
developed and are used to detect specific virulence markers (27,
28).
In this study, we investigated the salivary and serum
anti-H. pylori immunoglobulin G (IgG) immune
response in 50 dyspeptic patients and 20 healthy volunteers. As a
preliminary definition of its clinical value, the performance of this
assay was assessed against the histological, cultural, and biochemical
detection of the bacterium. Multiple biopsy specimens, from the antrum
and the body of the stomach, were obtained for histological, cultural, and biochemical examination. Five milliliters of venous blood and 5 ml
of unstimulated saliva were obtained from all subjects. Specimens were
stained with hematoxylin and eosin to evaluate the presence and
severity of gastritis as well as with a modified Giemsa stain to
identify H. pylori. Biopsy samples were cultured on pylori agar (bioMerieux) within 1 to 2 h of endoscopy. The plates were incubated for up to 6 days in 7 to 8% carbon dioxide. Isolates were considered to be H. pylori if they grew
as 0.5- to 1-mm translucent greyish colonies, were gram-negative curved or s-shaped rods, and were positive for oxidase, catalase, and urease.
The urease test (CP test; Yamanouchi Pharma) was carried out according
to the manufacturer's instructions, and samples were examined for the
presence of positive red color at 30 min and 24 h. Serum IgG
against H. pylori antigens was detected by ELISA, using
a commercially available kit (GAP test; Bio-Rad). Samples were
considered positive when antibody titers were >20 U/ml, as per the
manufacturer's guidelines. Evaluation of saliva IgG was performed by a
modification of the above-described procedure. One hundred microliters
of saliva was diluted 1:20 in phosphate-buffered saline supplemented
with 1% (wt/vol) bovine serum albumin in duplicate wells. After a 1-h
incubation at room temperature, a washing cycle with phosphate-buffered
saline-0.05% Tween 20 was performed. One hundred microliters of
peroxidase-conjugated anti-human IgG (supplied by the manufacturer) was
added per well, and the plates were incubated for another hour at room
temperature. A washing cycle was performed prior to the addition of 100 µl of freshly prepared substrate (H2O2) mixed
with tetramethylbenzidine as a chromogen. The colorimetric reaction was
then prolonged for 15 min at room temperature in the dark and
terminated with the addition of 50 µl of 4 N
H2SO4 per well. The adsorbance values (optical
density [OD]) at 450 nm were recorded with an automated reader.
Antibody titers of the H. pylori-positive and -negative
subjects were compared by Student's t test; a P
value of <0.05 indicated statistical significance. Sensitivity was
defined as the ratio between true positives and true positives plus
false negatives; specificity was defined as the ratio between true
negatives and true negatives plus false positives. Accuracy was defined
as the ratio between true positives plus true negatives and the total
number of subjects. Positive predictive value (PPV) was defined as the
ratio between true positives and true positives plus false positives
and negative predictive value (NPV) was defined as the ratio between
true negatives and true negatives plus false negatives.
Gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer, or gastric erosions were diagnosed
endoscopically in 33 of 70 (47%) subjects (in 30 of 50 patients with
dyspepsia and in 3 of 20 asymptomatic healthy volunteers). H. pylori positivity was confirmed by culture for 31 subjects, by histology for 34 subjects, and by urease testing for 33 subjects. One asymptomatic healthy subject was H. pylori positive. The degrees of concordance were 91% for culture
and the urease test, 87% for culture and histology, and 84% between
histology and the urease test. The concordance for all tests was 81%.
Serum antibodies against H. pylori were detected in
91% (30 of 33) of patients with gastric lesions and in 100% (31 of
31) with positive H. pylori identification. The
performance of the anti-H. pylori saliva IgG assay for
H. pylori-positive patients was compared with that for H. pylori-negative patients as defined by the
microbiological detection of H. pylori (Fig.
1a). H. pylori-positive
patients showed significantly higher titers of anti-H.
pylori IgG (mean OD ± standard deviation, 0.500 ± 0.392) than H. pylori-negative subjects (OD, 0.134 ± 0.06) (P < 0.05). True-positive rates (sensitivity) and false-positive rates (100% minus specificity) were calculated at
different cutoff values and plotted to obtain a receiver operating characteristic curve (Fig. 1b). In this analysis, the point that encloses the largest area, i.e., the point that lies farthest to the
"northwest" of the graph (OD, 0.21), represents the best compromise
between sensitivity and specificity (22) and was chosen for
our initial analysis. At this cutoff rate, the salivary IgG test was
considered positive for 30 of 70 (42%) patients (Table 1). The test was positive for 26 of 31 H. pylori-positive patients (sensitivity, 84%) and 4 of 39 H. pylori-negative patients (specificity, 90%).
Accuracy was 87%; the PPV and NPV were 86 and 88%, respectively (Table 2). A sensitivity of 100% with a
narrow 95% confidence interval (89 to 100%) was obtained by employing
a cutoff OD of 0.12 (31 of 31 positive tests for H. pylori-positive patients) (Fig. 1). The performance of the saliva
test at this cutoff rate was identical to that of the serum IgG test
(Table 1).

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
ELISA detection of salivary anti-H.
pylori IgG. (a) Distribution of salivary IgG responses for
H. pylori (Hp)-positive and -negative patients. (b)
Receiver operating characteristic curve for the salivary IgG response.
(Inset) Calculated assay sensitivity and specificity at different
cutoff levels.
|
|
It is widely accepted that the serum anti-H. pylori IgG
test is reliable for detecting H. pylori (12, 23,
27, 32). The diagnostic value and limitations of the GAP test
ELISA have been addressed in several studies (8, 26, 27,
29). H. pylori antibodies can also be measured in
salivary secretions, but the value of this procedure has not been
established (9, 13, 14, 21, 24). In this study we have
evaluated the performance of a test for the detection of salivary IgG
against H. pylori and calculated its sensitivity and
specificity at different cutoff values. The choice of cutoff line is an
important parameter, as it affects the assay's specificity and
sensitivity in a reciprocal manner, with a major impact on the clinical
decision-making process. A positive result at a cutoff level
allowing for a high specificity (OD of 0.38 in our study) for a
patient with ulcer and/or a positive urease test may justify the
starting of therapy while awaiting the results of cultural and/or
histological examination. When employed for population screening, on
the other hand, a test requires a high sensitivity and, therefore, a
lower cutoff. Its attendant low specificity may be an acceptable
trade-off for certain clinical purposes. The high NPV at the cutoff of
0.12 could be of assistance in excluding patients from further invasive
diagnostic procedures.
The sensitivity and specificity of a test depend upon certain
characteristics of the population examined. Confounding factors, such
as antibiotic therapy, may impact the performance of anti-H. pylori IgG assays. Five patients receiving anti-H.
pylori therapy in the months prior to the study had positive
salivary IgG tests but negative culture, histology, and urease results.
This finding is consistent with the results of long-term serological
surveillance studies (30) that showed that IgG antibody
values were lower, but not yet within the normal range, 6 to 12 months
after anti-H. pylori therapy. The possibility of
"patchy" infections could also contribute to the low specificity of
immunological tests compared to those of cultural or histological tests.
These results show that ELISA for detection of salivary
anti-H. pylori IgG is a rapid, noninvasive, inexpensive
test that may be considered as an alternative to the serum IgG test
when blood samples are not available or in pediatric populations. While endoscopy and tissue biopsies remain irreplaceable for the definitive confirmation of the H. pylori status, the present study
supports a role for the salivary IgG antibody response in screening
patients with dyspepsia. Although certain ulcers and gastritis occur
independently of H. pylori infection, a negative
anti-H. pylori salivary IgG status may help in reducing
the number of unnecessary endoscopies, especially in low-risk patients,
such as subjects under 45 years of age (25).
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank E. Bonvini (Laboratory of Immunobiology,
DMA, OTRR, CBER) for helpful discussions and for critical review
of the manuscript and S. Misra (OTRR, CBER) for assistance with the
statistical analysis.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Present address: Laboratory of
Tumor Immunology and Biology, National Cancer Institute, National
Institutes of Health, Bldg. 10, Rm. 5B38, 9000 Rockville Pike,
Bethesda, MD 20892. Phone: (301) 496-0419. Fax: (301) 402-0711 or (301) 480-2002. E-mail: pascalir{at}mail.nih.gov.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
| Atherton, J. C. 1997. Non-endoscopic
tests in the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection.
Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 11(Suppl.
1):11-20.
|
| 2.
|
Barthel, J. S., and E. D. Everett.
1990.
Diagnosis of Campylobacter pylori infections: the "gold standard" and the alternatives.
Rev. Infect. Dis.
12:S107-S114.
|
| 3.
|
Blaser, M. J.,
P. H. Chyou, and A. Nomura.
1995.
Age at establishment of Helicobacter pylori infection and gastric carcinoma, gastric ulcer and duodenal ulcer risk.
Cancer Res.
55:562-565[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Blaser, M. J.
1992.
Hypothesis on the pathogenesis and natural history of Helicobacter pylori-induced inflammation.
Gastroenterology
102:720-727[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Cover, T. L., and M. J. Blaser.
1995.
Helicobacter pylori: a bacterial cause of gastritis, peptic ulcer disease and gastric cancer.
Science
1:21-26.
|
| 6.
|
Crabtree, J. E.,
J. I. Wyatt,
G. M. Sobala,
G. Miller,
D. S. Tompkins,
J. N. Primrose, and A. G. Morgan.
1993.
Systemic and mucosal humoral response to Helicobacter pylori in gastric cancer.
Gut
34:1339-1343[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Crabtree, J. E., and S. M. Farmery.
1995.
Helicobacter pylori and gastric mucosal cytokines: evidence that CagA-positive strains are more virulent.
Lab. Investig.
73:742-745[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Crabtree, J. E.,
T. M. Shallcross,
R. V. Heatley, and J. I. Wyatt.
1991.
Evaluation of a commercial ELISA for serodiagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection.
J. Clin. Pathol.
44:326-328[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Fallone, C. A.,
M. Elizov,
O. Cleland,
J. A. Thompson,
G. E. Wild,
J. Lough,
J. Faria, and A. N. Barkun.
1996.
Detection of Helicobacter pylori infection by saliva IgG testing.
Am. J. Gastroenterol.
91:1145-1149[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Graham, D. Y.,
P. D. Klein,
D. J. Evans,
L. C. Alpert,
A. R. Operkun, and T. W. Boutton.
1987.
Campylobacter pylori detected noninvasively by the 13C-urea breath test.
Lancet
i:1174-1179.
|
| 11.
|
Jones, D. M.,
A. M. Lessels, and J. Eldrig.
1984.
Campylobacter-like organisms in the gastric mucosa: culture, histological and serological studies.
J. Clin. Pathol.
37:1002-1006[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Kosunen, T. U.,
K. Seppala,
S. Sarna, and P. Sipponen.
1992.
Diagnostic value of decreasing IgG, IgA and IgM antibody titers after eradication of Helicobacter pylori.
Lancet
339:893-895[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Luzza, F.,
M. Maletta,
M. Imeneo,
A. Marcheggiano,
C. Iannoni,
L. Biancone, and F. Pallone.
1995.
Salivary-specific immunoglobulin G in the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in dyspeptic patients.
Am. J. Gastroenterol.
90:1820-1823[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Luzza, F.,
M. Maletta,
M. Imeneo,
P. Doldo,
R. Marasco,
L. Biancone, and F. Pallone.
1995.
Salivary specific IgG is a sensitive indicator of the humoral immune response to Helicobacter pylori.
FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol.
10:281-284[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Marshall, B., and J. R. Warren.
1983.
Unidentified curved bacilli on gastric epithelium in active chronic gastritis.
Lancet
i:1273-1275.
|
| 16.
|
Marshall, B., and J. R. Warren.
1984.
Unidentified curved bacilli in the stomach of patients with gastritis and peptic ulceration.
Lancet
i:1311-1314.
|
| 17.
|
Marvaso, A., and S. Esposito.
1995.
Ruolo patogenetico dell'Helicobacter pylori nelle malattie gastroduodenali.
Infezioni Med.
4:173-188.
|
| 18.
|
Megraud, F.
1995.
Epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori infection: where are we in 1995?
Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.
7:292-295[Medline].
|
| 19.
|
NIH Consensus Development Conference.
1994.
Helicobacter pylori in peptic ulcer disease.
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md.
|
| 20.
|
Parsonnet, J.,
G. D. Friedman,
D. P. Vandersteen,
Y. Chang,
J. H. Vogelman,
N. Orentreich, and R. K. Sibley.
1991.
Helicobacter pylori infection and the risk of carcinoma.
N. Engl. J. Med.
325:1127-1131[Abstract].
|
| 21.
|
Reilly, T. G.,
V. Poxon,
D. S. Sanders,
T. S. Elliott, and R. P. Walt.
1997.
Comparison of serum, salivary, and rapid whole blood diagnostic tests for Helicobacter pylori and their validation against endoscopy based tests.
Gut
40:454-458[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Sackett, D. L.,
R. B. Haynes, and P. Tugwell.
1985.
Clinical epidemiology: a basic science for clinical medicine.
Little, Brown & Co., Boston, Mass.
|
| 23.
|
Schembri, M. A.,
S. K. Lin, and J. R. Lambert.
1993.
Comparison of commercial tests for Helicobacter pylori antibodies.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
31:2621-2624[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Simor, A. E.,
E. Lin,
F. Saibil,
L. Cohen,
M. Louie,
S. Pearen, and H. A. Donhoffer.
1996.
Evaluation of enzyme immunoassay for detection of salivary antibody to Helicobacter pylori.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
34:550-553[Abstract].
|
| 25.
|
Sobala, G. M.,
J. E. Crabtree,
J. A. Pentith,
B. J. Rathbone,
T. M. Shallcross,
J. I. Wyatt,
M. F. Dixon,
R. V. Heatlet, and A. T. R. Axon.
1991.
Screening dyspepsia by serology to Helicobacter pylori.
Lancet
338:94-96[Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Taha, A. S.,
J. Reid,
P. Boothman,
C. G. Gemmell,
F. D. Lee,
R. D. Sturrock, and R. I. Russell.
1993.
Serological diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori: evaluation of four tests in the presence and absence of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.
Gut
34:461-465[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
| Vaira, D., J. Holton, M. Menegatti, F. Landi, C. Ricci,
A. Ali', L. Gatta, S. Farinelli, C. Acciardi, B. Massardi, M. Miglioli, and the Italian Helicobacter pylori Study
Group. 1998. Blood tests in the management of Helicobacter
pylori infection. Gut 43(Suppl.
1):S39-S46.
|
| 28.
|
Vaira, D.,
M. Menegatti,
M. Fusconi,
S. Farinelli,
F. Landi,
N. Figura,
S. Quan,
G. Monti,
J. Holton,
C. Ricci,
A. Ali',
F. Mucci,
C. Acciardi,
G. Lupinacci,
F. Milesi,
W. Giorcelli,
P. Maiolo,
A. Zambelli,
A. Petronelli,
F. Pannuti,
R. Corinaldesi, and M. Miglioli.
1997.
Helicobacter pylori: detection of anti-lysate, -CagA and -VacA reactivity by recombinant immunoblot assay in sera from 2924 subjects.
Gut
41:A163.
|
| 29.
|
van den Oever, H. L. A.,
R. J. L. F. Loffeld, and E. E. Stobberingh.
1991.
Usefulness of a new serological test (Bio-Rad) to diagnose Helicobacter pylori-associated gastritis.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
29:283-286[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Veenedaal, R. A.,
A. S. Pena,
J. L. Meijer,
H. P. N. Endtz,
M. M. C. van der Est,
W. van Duijn,
F. Eulerink,
J. Kreuning, and C. B. H. W. Lamars.
1991.
Long term surveillance after treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection.
Gut
32:1291-1294[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Wyatt, J. I., and M. S. Dixon.
1988.
Chronic gastritis a pathogenetic approach.
J. Pathol.
154:113-124[Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Wyatt, J. I., and B. J. Rathbone.
1989.
The role of serology in the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection.
Scand. J. Gastroenterol.
24:S27-S34.
|
| 33.
|
Xiang, Z.,
S. Censini,
P. F. Bayeli,
J. L. Telford,
N. Figura,
R. Rappuoli, and A. Covacci.
1995.
Analysis of expression of CagA and VacA virulence factors in 43 strains of Helicobacter pylori reveals that clinical isolates can be divided into two major types and that CagA is not necessary for expression of the vacuolating cytotoxin.
Infect. Immun.
63:94-98[Abstract].
|
| 34.
|
Xiang, Z.,
M. Bugnoli,
A. Ponzetto,
A. Morgando,
N. Figura,
A. Covacci,
R. Petracca,
C. Pennatini,
S. Censini,
D. Armellini, and R. Rappuoli.
1993.
Detection in an immunoassay of an immunoresponse to a recombinant fragment of the 128 kilodalton protein (CagA) of Helicobacter pylori.
Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.
12:739-745[Medline].
|
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, February 1999, p. 430-432, Vol. 37, No. 2
0095-1137/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Megraud, F., Lehours, P.
(2007). Helicobacter pylori Detection and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
20: 280-322
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sabbi, T., De Angelis, P., Colistro, F., Dall'Oglio, L., di Abriola, G. F., Castro, M.
(2005). Efficacy of Noninvasive Tests in the Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori Infection in Pediatric Patients. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med
159: 238-241
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bode, G., Marchildon, P., Peacock, J., Brenner, H., Rothenbacher, D.
(2002). Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori Infection in Children: Comparison of a Salivary Immunoglobulin G Antibody Test with the [13C]Urea Breath Test. CVI
9: 493-495
[Abstract]
[Full Text]