This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Metherell, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Stanley, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Metherell, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Stanley, J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, February 1999, p. 433-435, Vol. 37, No. 2
0095-1137/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

PCR-Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Detection and Identification of Campylobacter Species: Application to Isolates and Stool Samples

L. A. Metherell, J. M. J. Logan, and J. Stanley*

Molecular Biology Unit, Virus Reference Division, Central Public Health Laboratory, London NW9 5HT, United Kingdom

Received 6 July 1998/Returned for modification 7 September 1998/Accepted 15 November 1998


    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

We report a PCR-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay which identifies Campylobacter species by capture hybridization of a single-stranded 16S rRNA gene amplicon with species-specific probes in a microtiter plate format. Specificities were confirmed for both reference and field strains, but the type strain of Campylobacter coli was atypical. The assay was rapid, informative, and usable with stool-extracted DNA.


    TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

We have previously described PCRs which identify individual Campylobacter species from pure cultures or fecal DNA extracts (3-5). In routine clinical laboratory practice, a further advantage would be to avoid multiple PCRs by generating one amplicon containing sequence polymorphisms suitable for species-specific identification.

DNA was extracted (8) from the reference strains listed in Table 1, 49 Campylobacter jejuni and 14 C. coli Penner serotype reference strains, 10 field isolates of C. jejuni, 8 of C. coli, 4 of C. lari, 4 of C. upsaliensis, 4 of C. helveticus, 2 of C. hyointestinalis, and 5 of C. fetus. These were used to analyze probe specificities.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1.   Reference strains of Campylobacter, Arcobacter, and Helicobacter species

First-round symmetric PCR was performed with genus-specific primers, C412F and C1228R (5). Second-round asymmetric PCR was performed with 10 µl of the first-round reaction mixture in a 50-µl volume, with a single 5' end fluorescein-labelled primer, C690F (see below). Conditions were as described previously (5), except that the annealing temperature was raised to 60°C and the primer concentration of 400 nM gave a >5:1 ratio of C690F/C1228R. The PCR-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was performed as described previously (6), except that 100 ng of capture probe was immobilized, denaturation of second-round PCR product was unnecessary, and the conjugate was diluted 1:1,000. The optical density (OD) of the final yellow product was measured at 450/620 nm (see Fig. 1): signals were considered negative if the absorbance was below 0.1 OD unit and positive if it was above 0.2 OD unit. Certain first-round PCR products were investigated by sequencing with a Prism DNA cycle sequencing kit, a 373A automated DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems), and the primers C1228R (5) and C641F (see below).

16S rRNA gene sequences of the following species were aligned by using the CLUSTAL program (2): C. gracilis L37787 and L04320, [Bacteroides] ureolyticus L04321, Campylobacter sp. strain CLO L14632, Campylobacter sp. strain L04318, C. coli L04312 and M59073, C. concisus L06977 and L04322, C. curvus L06976 and L04313, C. fetus subsp. venerealis L14633, C. fetus subsp. fetus L04314, C. helveticus U03022, C. hyointestinalis M65010 and M65009, C. jejuni Z29326 and M59298, C. jejuni subsp. jejuni L04315, C. lari L04316, C. mucosalis-like L14629, C. mucosalis L06978, C. rectus L06973 and L04317, C. showae L06975, L06974, and UPTC L14631, C. sputorum subsp. bubulus L04319, C. sputorum subsp. sputorum X67775, and C. upsaliensis L14628. Two Campylobacter genus-specific primers, C641F (5'-GAGAGGCAGATGGAATTGG-3'; sequencing primer) and C690F (5'-AGATACCCTGGTAGTCCACG-3'; second-round primer), were thereby designed.

Eight capture probes were designed to target variable regions; accession numbers of sequences bearing perfect matches to these probes are given in Table 2. Four probes (lar, fet, hyo, and ups) were designed to capture amplicons from C. lari, C. fetus, C. hyointestinalis, and C. upsaliensis, respectively. Probe ups/hel was designed to capture amplicons from C. upsaliensis and C. helveticus. Thus, capture with both ups and ups/hel would indicate C. upsaliensis; capture with the latter alone would indicate C. helveticus. A positive reaction with probes jej/col 1 and jej/col 2 should indicate C. jejuni, that with col and jej/col 2 should indicate C. coli, that with jej/col 1 alone should indicate the urease-positive thermophilic campylobacter group (UPTC), and that with jej/col 2 alone should indicate oral campylobacters (Table 2).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 2.   Campylobacter capture probes, their sequences, and homologies

To evaluate the probes, amplicons from the 21 reference strains of Campylobacter, the 16 reference strains of Helicobacter, the 4 reference strains of Arcobacter (Table 1), 63 Penner serotype reference strains (see above), and 37 Campylobacter field isolates (speciated by phenotype) were hybridized with the eight probes in a microtiter plate format. All capture probes except col hybridized with both their respective type strains and the corresponding field isolates (Table 1; Fig. 1). No capture was observed for the remaining species of Campylobacter, Helicobacter, and Arcobacter. Probe col reacted with the type strain but not with the serotype reference strains or field isolates of C. coli. Probe jej/col 1 reacted with all strains and isolates of C. jejuni and also C. coli (except NCTC 11366T).


View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 1.   PCR-ELISA results for 13 strains and 37 field isolates of Campylobacter. Values shown for C. jejuni, C. lari, C. upsaliensis, C. helveticus, C. hyointestinalis, and C. fetus are the average for type strains (t), described in Table 1, and field isolates (i). C. coli field isolates behaved differently from the type strain. Values are shown for type strains of C. concisus and C. rectus, a reference strain of the UPTC group, and a negative control, Helicobacter pylori.

To further analyze these two apparent anomalies, we sequenced amplicons from 52 of 63 Penner serotype reference strains of C. coli and C. jejuni. All had a similar sequence between positions 732 and 1198, falling into three groups which varied only at positions 837, 1010, and 1019. Nineteen C. jejuni reference strains (Penner serotypes HS 1 to 6, 10, 13 to 18, 22, 31, 37, 40, 44, 62, and 64) and 12 C. coli reference strains (HS 5, 14, 25, 26, 28, 30, 34, 39, 47, 48, 51, and 54) had G, T, and A at positions 837, 1010, and 1019, respectively (EMBL accession no. AJ006477). Nineteen C. jejuni strains (HS 7 to 9, 12, 19, 21, 23, 27, 29, 32, 33, 36, 38, 41, 42, 53, 58, 60, and 63) and one C. coli strain (HS 20) had A at positions 837 and 1010 and T at position 1019 (accession no. AJ006478). C. jejuni HS 43 uniquely had G at position 837, A at position 1010, and T at position 1019 (accession no. AJ006479).

The new assay format (without probe col) was tested on DNA extracted from 40 clinical fecal samples and 10 fecal samples from healthy volunteers as described previously (3). The clinical samples comprised 28 from which presumptive C. jejuni or C. coli had been cultured by standard methods (4), 10 Campylobacter culture-negative samples (5 positive for Salmonella, 1 for Shigella, 1 for Aeromonas, 1 for Cryptosporidium, and 2 for Giardia), and 2 samples in which no pathogenic organisms were detected. Amplicons from the 28 Campylobacter culture-positive samples hybridized with jej/col 1 and jej/col 2, indicating C. jejuni or C. coli, and were assigned to one of these species as previously described (4). The 10 samples positive for other enteropathogens showed no hybridization. One culture-negative sample reacted with ups and ups/hel, and the other reacted with hyo. Results for these two samples were confirmed with individual species-specific PCR assays for C. upsaliensis and C. hyointestinalis (4, 5). For the 10 samples from healthy volunteers, 6 negative results were obtained with all probes, while 2 were weakly positive with jej/col 1 alone and 2 were weakly positive with jej/col 2 alone, consistent with the presence of nonpathogenic campylobacters.

The data for probes jej/col 1, jej/col 2, and col and the sequencing studies described above indicate that the C. coli type strain is not representative of that species. This and the fact that there are no clear-cut differences between C. jejuni and C. coli explain why probe col did not hybridize with any other C. coli strains and highlight the need for caution when using sequence data derived from type strains alone (see also reference 1).

This PCR-ELISA is fast, informative, and can be customized by the addition or subtraction of probes to identify species of particular interest. Its microtiter plate format and nonisotopic detection are readily suited to automation. It should find use both in diagnostic laboratories and in molecular ecological studies of campylobacter prevalence in human disease.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was funded by a grant from the Department of Health, London, United Kingdom (DH220B).

We thank the Campylobacter Reference Unit, Central Public Health Laboratory, for provision of field isolates.


    FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Molecular Biology Unit, Virus Reference Division, Central Public Health Laboratory, 61 Colindale Ave., London NW9 5HT, United Kingdom. Phone: 44 181 2004400. Fax: 44 181 2001569. E-mail: jlogan{at}hgmp.mrc.ac.uk.


    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Text
References

1. Clayton, R. A., G. Sutton, P. S. Hinkle, C. Bult, and C. Fields. 1995. Intraspecific variation in small-subunit rRNA sequences in GenBank: why single sequences may not adequately represent prokaryotic taxa. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 45:595-599[Abstract/Free Full Text].
2. Higgins, D. G., A. J. Bleasby, and R. Fuchs. 1992. CLUSTAL V: improved software for multiple sequence alignment. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 8:189-191[Abstract/Free Full Text].
3. Lawson, A. J., D. Linton, J. Stanley, and R. J. Owen. 1997. Polymerase chain reaction detection and speciation of Campylobacter upsaliensis and C. helveticus in human faeces and comparison with culture techniques. J. Appl. Microbiol. 83:375-380[Medline].
4. Linton, D., A. J. Lawson, R. J. Owen, and J. Stanley. 1997. PCR detection, identification to species level, and fingerprinting of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli direct from diarrheic samples. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:2568-2572[Abstract/Free Full Text].
5. Linton, D., R. J. Owen, and J. Stanley. 1996. Rapid identification by PCR of the genus Campylobacter and of five Campylobacter species enteropathogenic for man and animals. Res. Microbiol. 147:707-718[Medline].
6. Patel, S., M. Yates, and N. A. Saunders. 1997. PCR-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and partial rRNA gene sequencing: a rational approach to identifying mycobacteria. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:2375-2380[Abstract/Free Full Text].
7. Vandamme, P., M. I. Daneshvar, F. E. Dewhirst, et al. 1995. Chemotaxonomic analyses of Bacteroides gracilis and Bacteroides ureolyticus and reclassification of B. gracilis as Campylobacter gracilis comb. nov. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 45:145-152[Abstract/Free Full Text].
8. Wilson, K. 1987. Preparation of genomic DNA from bacteria, p. 2.4.1-2.4.5. In F. M. Ausubel, R. Brent, R. E. Kingston, D. D. Moore, J. A. Smith, J. G. Seidman, and K. Struhl (ed.), Current protocols in molecular biology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y.

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, February 1999, p. 433-435, Vol. 37, No. 2
0095-1137/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.


This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Kawatsu, K., Kumeda, Y., Taguchi, M., Yamazaki-Matsune, W., Kanki, M., Inoue, K. (2008). Development and Evaluation of Immunochromatographic Assay for Simple and Rapid Detection of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli in Human Stool Specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46: 1226-1231 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Hill, J. E., Paccagnella, A., Law, K., Melito, P. L., Woodward, D. L., Price, L., Leung, A. H., Ng, L.-K., Hemmingsen, S. M., Goh, S. H. (2006). Identification of Campylobacter spp. and discrimination from Helicobacter and Arcobacter spp. by direct sequencing of PCR-amplified cpn60 sequences and comparison to cpnDB, a chaperonin reference sequence database.. J Med Microbiol 55: 393-399 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Klena, J. D., Parker, C. T., Knibb, K., Ibbitt, J. C., Devane, P. M. L., Horn, S. T., Miller, W. G., Konkel, M. E. (2004). Differentiation of Campylobacter coli, Campylobacter jejuni, Campylobacter lari, and Campylobacter upsaliensis by a Multiplex PCR Developed from the Nucleotide Sequence of the Lipid A Gene lpxA. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 5549-5557 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Lund, M., Nordentoft, S., Pedersen, K., Madsen, M. (2004). Detection of Campylobacter spp. in Chicken Fecal Samples by Real-Time PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 5125-5132 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Volokhov, D., Chizhikov, V., Chumakov, K., Rasooly, A. (2003). Microarray-Based Identification of Thermophilic Campylobacter jejuni, C. coli, C. lari, and C. upsaliensis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 4071-4080 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Maher, M., Finnegan, C., Collins, E., Ward, B., Carroll, C., Cormican, M. (2003). Evaluation of Culture Methods and a DNA Probe-Based PCR Assay for Detection of Campylobacter Species in Clinical Specimens of Feces. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 2980-2986 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kulkarni, S P, Lever, S, Logan, J M J, Lawson, A J, Stanley, J, Shafi, M S (2002). Detection of campylobacter species: a comparison of culture and polymerase chain reaction based methods. J. Clin. Pathol. 55: 749-753 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Collins, E., Glennon, M., Hanley, S., Murray, A.-M., Cormican, M., Smith, T., Maher, M. (2001). Evaluation of a PCR/DNA Probe Colorimetric Membrane Assay for Identification of Campylobacter spp. in Human Stool Specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39: 4163-4165 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Byrne, C., Doherty, D., Mooney, A., Byrne, M., Woodward, D., Johnson, W., Rodgers, F., Bourke, B. (2001). Basis of the Superiority of Cefoperazone Amphotericin Teicoplanin for Isolating Campylobacter upsaliensis from Stools. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39: 2713-2716 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Logan, J. M. J., Edwards, K. J., Saunders, N. A., Stanley, J. (2001). Rapid Identification of Campylobacter spp. by Melting Peak Analysis of Biprobes in Real-Time PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39: 2227-2232 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Tolcin, R., LaSalvia, M. M., Kirkley, B. A., Vetter, E. A., Cockerill, F. R. III, Procop, G. W. (2000). Evaluation of the Alexon-Trend ProSpecT Campylobacter Microplate Assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38: 3853-3855 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Lawson, A. J., Logan, J. M. J., O'neill, G. L., Desai, M., Stanley, J. (1999). Large-Scale Survey of Campylobacter Species in Human Gastroenteritis by PCR and PCR-Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37: 3860-3864 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Fermer, C., Engvall, E. O. (1999). Specific PCR Identification and Differentiation of the Thermophilic Campylobacters, Campylobacter jejuni, C. coli, C. lari, and C. upsaliensis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37: 3370-3373 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Metherell, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Stanley, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Metherell, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Stanley, J.

Copyright © 2010 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»