Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, March 1999, p. 690-693, Vol. 37, No. 3
0095-1137/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Rapid Detection of Epidemic Strains of
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Thomas A.
Wichelhaus,*
Sylvia
Kern,
Volker
Schäfer, and
Volker
Brade
Institute of Medical Microbiology, University
Hospital of Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Received 1 July 1998/Returned for modification 1 November
1998/Accepted 30 November 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
Fifty methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
(MRSA) initial isolates obtained from patients hospitalized in the
orthopedic clinic of the Frankfurt University Hospital and 150 methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) isolates
were investigated in this study to determine whether the Slidex
Staph-Kit is capable of differentiating between MRSA and MSSA
owing to its unique performance characteristics. The Slidex Staph-Kit
is a combined latex hemagglutination test designed to detect clumping
factor, protein A, and a specific surface immunogen for S. aureus. Clumping factor-positive strains cause erythrocytes
sensitized with fibrinogen to hemagglutinate, thereby resulting in
visible red clumps. S. aureus strains deficient in clumping
factor agglutinate latex particles sensitized with specific antibodies
against surface proteins of S. aureus, thereby resulting in
visible white clumps. Our results demonstrate that white clumping has a
99% specificity as well as a 98% positive predictive value
for MRSA. Clumping factor-negative MRSA, which have been reported to
occur in several countries, are epidemic in the Frankfurt area and
account for 80% of all MRSA initial isolates in the orthopedic clinic
of the Frankfurt University Hospital. Genotyping of all MRSA isolates
by macrorestriction analysis of chromosomal DNA revealed that 83% of
clumping factor-negative MRSA are closely related to the
"southern-German" epidemic strain. This is the first study
demonstrating the Slidex Staph-Kit's capability for identifying
epidemic clumping factor-negative S. aureus strains as
methicillin resistant even prior to antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Methicillin-resistant
Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains were initially
described in 1961 and emerged in the 1980s as a major epidemiological
problem in hospital settings (8, 16). MRSA strains with
widely different properties have now become endemic in hospitals and
are considered important nosocomial pathogens (14, 24,
26). Methicillin resistance rates differ markedly among countries
and range from less than 1% in Scandinavia to 60% in Japan (11,
27).
Accordingly, rapid detection of MRSA is crucial for purposes of
initiating hygienic measures and preventing further spread of the
pathogen. Commercially produced agglutination kits are available for
the rapid identification of S. aureus by clinical laboratories. Nonetheless, virtually all of them have the drawback that
additional time-consuming antimicrobial susceptibility testing generally is required in order to detect methicillin resistance in
S. aureus.
The aim of this study was to assess the capability and specificity with
which the Slidex Staph-Kit differentiates between MRSA and
methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA).
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Bacterial strains.
A total of 50 MRSA isolates and 150 MSSA
isolates were investigated in this study. The MRSA initial isolates
were cultured from clinical specimens obtained from the orthopedic
clinic of the Frankfurt University Hospital between 1993 and 1997. All
isolates had been classified as MRSA during routine investigations and were stored in stock cultures prior to the study, as described previously (29). The MSSA isolates were cultured
consecutively from clinical specimens obtained from the Frankfurt
University Hospital. S. aureus ATCC 25923 was employed as
the reference strain.
Agglutination kits and further characterization.
The Slidex
Staph-Kit (bioMerieux Vitek, Inc., Hazelwood, Mo.) is a latex and
erythrocyte combination agglutination system for the detection of
clumping factor, protein A, and other specific immunogens of S. aureus. The Staphylase test (Oxoid, Basingstoke, England) is an
erythrocyte agglutination kit for the detection of clumping factor.
Both agglutination tests were performed according to the
manufacturers' instructions. A tube coagulase test was performed on
each isolate. Plasma coagulation was tested with rabbit plasma (Difco,
Detroit, Mich.), and the results were read after 2, 4, 6, and 24 h
at 37°C. All isolates were screened for hyaluronidase activity by
testing the decapsulation reaction on a cross-inoculated streak of a
mucous strain of Streptococcus equi (9, 19).
Detection of methicillin resistance.
All of the S. aureus isolates were cultured on Mueller-Hinton agar supplemented
with 6 µg of oxacillin/ml and 4% NaCl (Biotest, Heidelberg, Germany)
(13, 20). The plates were incubated at 30°C for 48 h
and examined for evidence of growth to detect resistance phenotypically. The presence of the mecA gene was proved for
all strains by means of PCR. Purification of bacterial DNA was carried out with the QIAmp tissue kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) in accordance with the manufacturers' instructions. Amplification of the
mecA gene was performed with the primers mecA1
(5'-AAA ATC GAT GGT AAA GGT TGG C) and mecA2 (5'-AGT TCT GCA
GTA CCG GAT TTG C), yielding a PCR product of 533 bp (15).
DNA amplification was carried out for 30 cycles as previously described
(25): denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, annealing at 57°C
for 1 min, and extension at 72°C for 2 min, with a final
extension at 72°C for 5 min. The PCR product was cleaved by the
restriction enzyme HhaI (New England BioLabs, Schwalbach,
Germany) to confirm the specificity of the mecA primers
(25). Electrophoresis of DNA was carried out in 2% agarose
gel, which was then stained with ethidium bromide and photographed under UV light.
Genotyping.
All MRSA isolates were analyzed by pulsed-field
gel electrophoresis (PFGE) as described previously (29).
Briefly, genomic DNA was prepared in low-melting-point agarose plugs
and digested with SmaI restriction enzyme (New England
BioLabs). Electrophoresis was performed on the CHEF-DR III (Bio-Rad
Laboratories, Richmond, Calif.) apparatus. A constant voltage of 6 V/cm
was applied, with an increasing pulse time of 5 to 50 s over a
period of 22 h in order to separate DNA fragments. Computer-aided
analysis of DNA fragment patterns was performed with the DNA
fingerprint analysis software Wincam 2.2 (Cybertech, Berlin, Germany).
 |
RESULTS |
Strain characterization.
Coagulase production and
hyaluronidase activity was demonstrated for all S. aureus
isolates in this study. Methicillin resistance was proved genotypically
for all isolates by amplification of the mecA gene (Fig.
1) as well as phenotypically by
growth on Mueller-Hinton agar supplemented with 6 µg of oxacillin/ml
and 4% NaCl.

View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Agarose gel electrophoresis of mecA PCR
product. Lanes: M, size markers; 1, mecA-positive
S. aureus strain; 2, restriction of amplified DNA with
HhaI; 3, mecA-negative S. aureus
reference strain ATCC 25923.
|
|
Genotyping.
Macrorestriction analysis of 50 MRSA initial
isolates obtained from the orthopedic clinic of the Frankfurt
University Hospital in a 5-year period revealed 18 different genotypes
(Fig. 2). Fifty percent of all isolates
belonged to type 1, and strongly corresponding restriction fragment
patterns indicating close clonal relatedness between MRSA types 1, 7, 71, and 72 were obvious (Fig. 3).

View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
PFGE patterns of SmaI digests of total DNA
from representatives of each pulsotype (indicated by numbers above
lanes). Lanes M, size markers. Molecular sizes (in kilobases) are
indicated on the right.
|
|
Agglutination performance.
Table
1 compares the performance of the Slidex
Staph-Kit with that of the Staphylase agglutination test. It could be
demonstrated that all MRSA initial isolates closely related to the
epidemic strain, as well as isolates belonging to MRSA types 6, 76, 82, and 83, exhibited white-clumping behavior (Fig.
4). In every instance where the Slidex
Staph-Kit exhibited white clumping the Staphylase agglutination test
was negative, which indicates that these strains were at least
phenotypically clumping factor negative. In contrast, 149 of 150 MSSA
isolates classified during routine investigation were determined to be
clumping factor positive, i.e., they exhibited red-clumping behavior
(Fig. 5).
 |
DISCUSSION |
Rapid and accurate identification of methicillin resistance in
S. aureus is of ongoing clinical importance for
controlling the spread of this pathogen within hospital settings. The
plasma coagulase test is generally acknowledged as the "gold
standard" for the identification of S. aureus.
Nevertheless, the use of commercial agglutination kits for identifying
S. aureus is widespread in clinical microbiological
laboratories, since these tests are easy to perform and the results are
available within minutes. Whereas the first-generation agglutination
kits are capable of detecting clumping factor and/or protein A for
S. aureus strains while failing to identify certain
MRSA strains (3, 22), second-generation agglutination kits,
such as the Slidex Staph-Kit, possess the additional feature of being
able to detect specific surface antigens for S. aureus.
Numerous studies have been published confirming the high sensitivity
and specificity of these second-generation kits for the identification
of MSSA as well as MRSA (1, 4-6, 10, 17, 23, 30).
Definitive detection of methicillin resistance, however, still requires
time-consuming antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
This is the first study demonstrating that the Slidex Staph-Kit is a
reliable and, above all, rapid method for identifying epidemic clumping
factor-negative MRSA even prior to antimicrobial susceptibility
testing. Owing to its unique design as a combined latex and
hemagglutination test, it reacts, in contrast to all the other latex
agglutination kits, in two different ways. Red clumps indicate
the presence of clumping factor, with which S. aureus causes erythrocytes sensitized with fibrinogen to
agglutinate (Fig. 5). White clumps, on the other hand, signal both the
absence of clumping factor and the presence of other immunogens, which trigger the agglutination of the latex particles (Fig. 4). This study
shows that white clumping has a 99% specificity and a 98% positive
predictive value for the detection of methicillin resistance in
S. aureus. Fifty percent of all initial isolates
obtained from the orthopedic clinic of the Frankfurt University
Hospital and more than 60% of all initial isolates in the Frankfurt
metropolitan area, including six community hospitals and the University
Hospital (29), belong to one genotype, which has been
identified by the Robert Koch Institute, the German national institute
of infectious diseases, as the so-called "southern-German" epidemic
strain. This epidemic strain is clumping factor negative and exhibits white-clumping behavior. Furthermore, it is not only epidemic in the
south but is also widespread in the northern parts of Germany (22,
31). Since bacteria do not respect international boundaries, it
came as no surprise when epidemic MRSA strains kindly sent to our
institution from Slovakia and Italy exhibited the same southern-German
genotype and showed white-clumping behavior (data not shown). As
demonstrated by PFGE in this study, it is not only the southern-German
epidemic strain which is clumping factor negative; other MRSA genotypes
also manifest this typical agglutination characteristic.
The Slidex Staph-Kit, of course, is neither designed nor licensed to
detect resistance, and as such, white clumping can be regarded only as
a clue to methicillin resistance. Nonetheless, to the extent that the
white clumping serves as a strong indicator for MRSA, rapid tests can
be conducted which confirm methicillin resistance and, upon request,
species identity within 4 hours. This validation can be achieved
genotypically, for example, by multiplex PCR, a method that enables the
detection of the mecA gene and a species-specific gene for
S. aureus within 5 to 6 h (2, 21).
Quicker and less labor intensive is the phenotypical verification of
MRSA with the BBL Crystal MRSA ID system from Becton Dickinson, which
can be performed within 4 h (12, 18, 28). Finally, the
phenotypical test for plasma coagulation can be performed to confirm
species specificity, analogous to the genotypic confirmation
by multiplex PCR (7) (Fig.
6).

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Procedure for the rapid identification of clumping
factor-negative MRSA with the Slidex Staph-Kit.
|
|
The results of this study, as well as the fact that a modern
second-generation agglutination test was required owing to the rising
incidence of clumping factor-negative MRSA, indicate that all clumping
factor-negative MRSA strains are capable of being recognized by the
Slidex Staph-Kit with its differentiated agglutination characteristics.
In view of these findings, the Slidex Staph-Kit is a valuable tool in
clinical laboratories with a frequent occurrence of clumping
factor-negative MRSA.
In conclusion, this study confirms the Slidex Staph-Kit's ability
within the context of the clinical microbiological laboratory to
pinpoint certain epidemic MRSA strains 24 h prior to the final results provided by antimicrobial susceptibility testing. In turn, the
initiation of effective infection control measures may reduce the
spread of this pathogen.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institute of
Medical Microbiology, University Hospital of Frankfurt,
Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany. Phone:
49/69/6301-5019. Fax: 49/69/6301-5767. E-mail:
Wichelhaus{at}em.uni-frankfurt.de.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Adams, J., and R. Van Enk.
1994.
Use of commercial particle agglutination systems for the rapid identification of methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.
13:86-89[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Brakstad, O. G.,
Y. Tveten,
F. Nato, and J. M. Fournier.
1993.
Comparison of various methods and reagents for species identification of Staphylococcus aureus positive or negative for the mecA gene.
APMIS
101:651-654[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Croize, J.,
P. Gialanella,
D. Monnet,
J. Okada,
A. Orsi,
A. Voss, and S. Merlin.
1993.
Improved identification of Staphylococcus aureus using a new agglutination test. Results of an international study.
APMIS
101:487-491[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Davies, S.
1997.
Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: the evaluation of rapid agglutination methods.
Br. J. Biomed. Sci.
54:13-15[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Felten, A.,
E. Lepage, and P. Lagrange.
1995.
Critical analysis of tests for rapid detection of Staphylococcus aureus, Pastorex Staph plus, Slidex Staph-kit and Staph aureus in clinical isolates.
Pathol. Biol.
43:471-476[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Fournier, J. M.,
A. Bouvet,
D. Mathieu,
F. Nato,
A. Boutonnier,
R. Gerbal,
P. Brunengo,
C. Saulnier,
N. Sagot,
B. Slizewicz, and J. C. Mazie.
1993.
New latex reagent using monoclonal antibodies to capsular polysaccharide for reliable identification of both oxacillin-susceptible and oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
31:1342-1344[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Janda, W. M.,
K. Ristow, and D. Novak.
1994.
Evaluation of RapiDEC Staph for identification of Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and Staphylococcus saprophyticus.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
32:2056-2059[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Jevons, M. P.
1961.
"Celbenin"-resistant staphylococci.
Br. Med. J.
1:124-125.
|
| 9.
|
Kaffka, A.
1957.
Erfahrungen mit einfachen Untersuchungsmethoden zum Nachweis von Hyaluronidase, Fibrinolysin und Phosphatase bei Staphylokokken.
Zentbl. Bakteriol.
168:381-385.
|
| 10.
|
Kampf, G.,
K. Weist,
S. Swidsinski,
M. Kegel, and H. Rüden.
1997.
Comparison of screening methods to identify methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.
16:301-307[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Kimura, A.,
H. Igarashi,
H. Ushioda,
K. Okuzuki,
H. Kobayashi, and T. Otsuka.
1992.
Epidemiological study of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from Japanese national university and medical college hospitals.
Kansenshogaku Zasshi
66:1543-1549[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Knapp, C. C.,
M. D. Ludwig, and J. A. Washington.
1994.
Evaluation of BBL Crystal MRSA ID system.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
32:2588-2589[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Mackenzie, A. M. R.,
H. Richardson,
R. Lannigan, and D. Wood.
1995.
Evidence that the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards disk test is less sensitive than the screen plate for detection of low-expression-class methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
33:1909-1911[Abstract].
|
| 14.
|
Michel, M., and L. Gutmann.
1997.
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci: therapeutic realities and possibilities.
Lancet
349:1901-1906[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Murakami, K.,
W. Minamide,
K. Wada,
E. Nakamura,
H. Teraoka, and S. Watanabe.
1991.
Identification of methicillin-resistant strains of staphylococci by polymerase chain reaction.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
29:2240-2244[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Panlilio, A. L.,
D. H. Culver,
R. P. Gaynes,
S. Banerjee,
T. S. Henderson,
J. S. Tolson, and W. J. Martone.
1992.
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in U.S. hospitals, 1975-1991.
Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol.
13:582-586[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Personne, P.,
M. Bes,
G. Lina,
F. Vandenesch,
Y. Brun, and J. Etienne.
1997.
Comparative performances of six agglutination kits assessed by using typical and atypical strains of Staphylococcus aureus.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
35:1138-1140[Abstract].
|
| 18.
|
Qadri, S. M. H.,
Y. Ueno,
H. Imambaccus, and E. Almodovar.
1994.
Rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by Crystal MRSA ID system.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
32:1830-1832[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Raus, J., and D. N. Lovee.
1983.
Characterization of coagulase-positive Staphylococcus intermedius and Staphylococcus aureus isolated from veterinary clinical specimens.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
18:789-792[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Schmalreck, A. F.,
W. Friedrich,
I. Kottmann,
A. Reiser,
U. Ruffer,
R. Schlenk,
P. Tränkle,
E. Vanca, and A. Wildfeuer.
1996.
Resistenzmuster von Staphylokokken und Nachweis des mecA-Gens.
Chemother. J.
4:195-202.
|
| 21.
|
Schmitz, F. J.,
B. Hofmann,
M. Finken-Eigen,
H. Idel,
U. Hadding,
H. P. Heinz, and K. Köhrer.
1996.
Etablierung einer Multiplex-PCR mit Aussagen zur Taxonomie, Pathogenität und Methicillin-Resistenz bei Staphylokokken.
J. Lab. Med.
20:543-550.
|
| 22.
|
Schwarzkopf, A.,
H. Karch,
H. Schmidt,
W. Lenz, and J. Heesemann.
1993.
Phenotypical and genotypical characterization of epidemic clumping factor-negative, oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
31:2281-2285[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Smole, S. C.,
E. Aronson,
A. Durbin,
S. M. Brecher, and R. D. Arbeit.
1998.
Sensitivity and specificity of an improved rapid latex agglutination test for identification of methicillin-sensitive and -resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
36:1109-1112[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Speller, D. C. E.,
A. P. Johnson,
D. James,
R. R. Marples,
A. Charlett, and R. C. George.
1997.
Resistance to methicillin and other antibiotics in isolates of Staphylococcus aureus from blood and cerebrospinal fluid, England and Wales, 1989-95.
Lancet
350:323-325[Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Ungeheuer, J.,
S. Wilms, and W. Sietzen.
1994.
mecA-Gen bei Staphylokokken vereinfachter Nachweis mit der PCR.
Chemother. J.
1:31-35.
|
| 26.
|
Vincent, J. L.,
D. J. Bihari,
P. M. Suter,
H. A. Bruining,
J. White,
M. H. Nicolas-Chanoin,
M. Wolff,
R. C. Spencer, and M. Hemmer.
1995.
The prevalence of nosocomial infection in intensive care units in Europe.
JAMA
274:639-644[Abstract].
|
| 27.
|
Voss, A.,
D. Milatovic,
C. Wallrauch-Schwarz,
V. T. Rosdahl, and I. Braveny.
1994.
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Europe.
Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.
13:50-55[Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Wallet, F.,
M. Roussel-Delvallez, and R. J. Courcol.
1996.
Choice of a routine method for detecting methicillin-resistance in staphylococci.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
37:901-909[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Wichelhaus, T. A.,
J. Schulze,
K. P. Hunfeld,
V. Schäfer, and V. Brade.
1997.
Clonal heterogeneity, distribution, and pathogenicity of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.
16:893-897[Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Wilkerson, M.,
S. McAllister,
J. M. Miller,
B. J. Heiter, and P. P. Bourbeau.
1997.
Comparison of five agglutination tests for identification of Staphylococcus aureus.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
35:148-151[Abstract].
|
| 31.
|
Witte, W.,
C. Cuny,
C. Braulke, and D. Hueck.
1994.
Clonal dissemination of two MRSA strains in Germany.
Epidemiol. Infect.
113:67-73[Medline].
|
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, March 1999, p. 690-693, Vol. 37, No. 3
0095-1137/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Besier, S., Smaczny, C., von Mallinckrodt, C., Krahl, A., Ackermann, H., Brade, V., Wichelhaus, T. A.
(2007). Prevalence and Clinical Significance of Staphylococcus aureus Small-Colony Variants in Cystic Fibrosis Lung Disease. J. Clin. Microbiol.
45: 168-172
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Jonas, D., Speck, M., Daschner, F. D., Grundmann, H.
(2002). Rapid PCR-Based Identification of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus from Screening Swabs. J. Clin. Microbiol.
40: 1821-1823
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Blake, J. E., Metcalfe, M. A.
(2001). A Shared Noncapsular Antigen Is Responsible for False-Positive Reactions by Staphylococcus epidermidis in Commercial Agglutination Tests for Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol.
39: 544-550
[Abstract]
[Full Text]