This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lu, J.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, C.-H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lu, J.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, C.-H.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, March 1999, p. 772-774, Vol. 37, No. 3
0095-1137/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Comparison of Five PCR Methods for Detection of Helicobacter pylori DNA in Gastric Tissues

Jang-Jih Lu,1,* Cherng-Lih Perng,1 Rong-Yaun Shyu,2 Chi-Hsiang Chen,1 Qinyuan Lou,3 Sonny K. F. Chong,3 and Chao-Hung Lee4

Division of Clinical Pathology, Department of Pathology,1 and Department of Internal Medicine,2 Tri-Service General Hospital and National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan; and Departments of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition3 and Pathology and Laboratory Medicine,4 Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202

Received 24 August 1998/Returned for modification 2 November 1998/Accepted 3 December 1998


    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

Five different PCR methods for the detection of Helicobacter pylori were evaluated. The results of this study indicate that of the five PCR methods examined, the ureC (glmM) gene PCR is the most sensitive and specific for the detection of H. pylori in gastric biopsy specimens.


    TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

Helicobacter pylori is an etiologic agent of chronic active gastritis and gastric and duodenal ulcers (6, 12). Many PCR methods have been developed to detect the organism directly in clinical specimens. The targets of these PCR methods include the 16S rRNA gene (8), the random chromosome sequence (17), the 26-kDa species-specific antigen (SSA) gene (7, 14), the urease A (ureA) gene (3), and the urease C (ureC) gene (1). The ureC gene has been shown to encode the phosphoglucosamine mutase, which is unrelated to urease production, and was renamed the glmM gene (4). To determine which PCR method is most appropriate to use, we compared the sensitivities and the specificities of five different PCR methods for the detection of H. pylori in gastric biopsy specimens.

The specimens used for this study were gastric biopsy samples from patients who had undergone endoscopy for diagnosis of abdominal pain or discomfort. Three pieces of gastric tissue were taken from each patient. The use of these specimens for research was approved by the internal review board of the Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. No histopathology was performed on these tissues in this study. These three pieces of tissue were pooled and ground together. An aliquot of the tissue homogenate was used for culture, and the remaining was used for PCR. H. pylori culture and identification were performed as described previously (9).

For PCR, DNA was isolated from 100 µl of tissue homogenate by using the Puregene DNA isolation kit (Gentra Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, Minn.) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Ten microliters (100 ng) of DNA was used as the template for each PCR. Each sample was examined by five different PCR methods. The PCRs were performed as described previously (1, 3, 7, 8, 17). The primer sequences, conditions, and sizes of these PCR methods are summarized in Table 1.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1.   Conditions for the five different PCR methods

The specificities of the five PCR methods were first examined for 15 different bacteria: Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC 12228, Streptococcus pyogenes ATCC 19615, Streptococcus agalactiae ATCC 13813, Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212, Haemophilus influenzae ATCC 35056, Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853, Pseudomonas maltophilia, Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 13883, Serratia marcescens, Enterobacter cloacae ATCC 23315, Proteus mirabilis ATCC 7002, Shigella sonnei ATCC 25931, and Salmonella typhi ATCC 6539. The H. pylori DNA was used as the positive control.

Bacterial DNA was also isolated by using the Puregene DNA isolation kit (Gentra Systems). None of the PCR methods produced any PCR products from these 15 different bacteria. To determine whether these negative PCR results were false due to the presence of PCR inhibitors, these bacterial samples were examined by the bacterial universal PCR (11) with primers U1 (5'-CGGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3') and U2 (5'-CCTTGTACACACCGCCCGTC-3'). All 15 bacterial samples were positive in this universal PCR.

All 24 culture-positive specimens were positive in the 16S rRNA gene, the SSA gene, and the ureC (glmM) gene PCRs. Only 18 of the 24 culture-positive specimens were positive in the ureA gene PCR, and 9 were positive in the random chromosome sequence PCR. One of the 26 culture-negative specimens was positive in all five PCRs, indicating that this specimen was false negative in culture. Twelve of the remaining 25 culture-negative specimens were positive in the 16S rRNA gene PCR, and 10 were positive in the SSA gene PCR. All of these 25 culture-negative specimens were negative in the ureC (glmM) gene, the ureA gene, and the random chromosome sequence PCRs (Table 2).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 2.   Results of five PCR methods for the detection of H. pylori in 50 gastric biopsy specimens

To determine the sensitivities of these PCR methods, a 10-fold serial dilution, from 10 ng to 1 fg, of a purified H. pylori DNA was made. Each dilution was examined by all five PCRs. The 16S rRNA gene PCR was determined to have a sensitivity of 0.01 pg of H. pylori DNA, which corresponds to approximately 5 organisms. The sensitivity of the other four PCR methods was found to be 10-fold (0.1 pg) lower than that of the 16S rRNA gene PCR. This is conceivable since the 16S rRNA gene PCR is a seminested PCR and the other four methods are single-step PCRs. However, the 16S rRNA gene PCR has a very poor specificity. It produced positive results with 13 of the 26 culture-negative biopsy specimens as described above. This finding is consistent with the previous report that the 16S rRNA gene PCR nonspecifically amplifies human DNA (2). Unfortunately, the 16S rRNA gene PCR has been the most widely used method for the detection of H. pylori in clinical specimens (10, 11, 13, 15, 18). The SSA gene PCR was also found to have a problem with specificity in this study. Although this PCR did not amplify any of the other bacterial DNAs, it amplified 10 of the 25 H. pylori culture-negative biopsy specimens. It is highly unlikely that all 10 samples were false negative by culture. The reasons for this poor sensitivity remain to be investigated.

The ureA gene and the random sequence PCRs appeared to be specific for H. pylori, but the sensitivities of these two methods were unsatisfactory. The random sequence PCR amplified only 38% (9 of 24) of H. pylori culture-positive biopsy samples, and the ureA gene PCR amplified 75% (18 of 24) of them. This low sensitivity may be due to sequence polymorphism in these two loci (5, 16, 17).

The ureC (glmM) gene PCR amplified all 24 H. pylori culture-positive biopsy specimens (positive predictive value, 100%) (Table 3) and produced only one false-positive result on 26 H. pylori culture-negative specimens (negative predictive value, 96%) (Table 3) or other bacterial DNA. However, this specimen was very likely false negative in culture because it was positive in all five PCRs, as mentioned above, and the patient had symptoms typical of H. pylori gastritis according to endoscopic examination. Although the sensitivity of the ureC (glmM) gene PCR was found to be 10 times lower (50 organisms) than that of the 16S rRNA gene PCR, the results of this study suggest that it has sufficient sensitivity for clinical applications. We therefore consider the ureC (glmM) gene PCR to be the most appropriate of the five different PCR methods examined for detection of H. pylori organisms in clinical specimens.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 3.   Positive and negative predictive values of the five different PCR methods


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by grant TSGH-C85-45 from Tri-Service General Hospital.


    FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, Division of Clinical Pathology, Department of Pathology, Tri-Service General Hospital, No. 8, Section 3, Ting-Chow Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. Phone: 886-2-2368-0235. Fax: 886-2-2368-0235. E-mail: JJL{at}NDMC1.NDMCTSGH.EDU.TW.


    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Text
References

1. Bickley, J., R. J. Owen, A. G. Fraser, and R. E. Pounder. 1993. Evaluation of the polymerase chain reaction for detecting the urease C gene of Helicobacter pylori in gastric biopsy samples and dental plaque. J. Med. Microbiol. 39:338-344[Abstract/Free Full Text].
2. Chong, S. K. F., Q. Lou, J. F. Fitzgerald, and C. H. Lee. 1996. Evaluation of the 16S rRNA gene PCR with primers Hp1 and Hp2 for detection of Helicobacter pylori. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:2728-2730[Abstract].
3. Clayton, C. L., H. Kleanthous, P. J. Coates, D. D. Morgan, and S. Tabaqchali. 1992. Sensitive detection of Helicobacter pylori by using polymerase chain reaction. J. Clin. Microbiol. 30:192-200[Abstract/Free Full Text].
4. De Reuse, H., A. Labigne, and D. Mengin-Lecreulx. 1997. The Helicobacter pylori ureC gene codes for a phosphoglucosamine mutase. J. Bacteriol. 179:3488-3493[Abstract/Free Full Text].
5. Foxall, P. A., L. T. Hu, and H. L. Mobley. 1992. Use of polymerase chain reaction-amplified Helicobacter pylori urease structural genes for differentiation of isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 30:739-741[Abstract/Free Full Text].
6. Graham, D. Y. 1991. Helicobacter pylori: its epidemiology and its role in duodenal ulcer disease. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 6:105-113[Medline].
7. Hammer, M., T. Tyszkiewicz, T. Wadstrom, and P. W. O'Toole. 1992. Rapid detection of Helicobacter pylori in gastric biopsy material by polymerase chain reaction. J. Clin. Microbiol. 30:54-58[Abstract/Free Full Text].
8. Ho, S. A., J. A. Hoyle, F. A. Lewis, A. D. Seker, D. Cross, N. P. Mapstone, M. F. Dixon, J. I. Wyatt, D. S. Tompkins, G. R. Taylor, and P. Quirke. 1991. Direct polymerase chain reaction test for detection of Helicobacter pylori in humans and animals. J. Clin. Microbiol. 29:2543-2549[Abstract/Free Full Text].
9. Jerris, R. C. 1995. Helicobacter, p. 492-496. In P. R. Murray, E. J. Baron, M. A. Pfaller, F. C. Tenover, and R. H. Yolken (ed.), Manual of clinical microbiology, 6th ed. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
10. Mapstone, N. P., D. A. F. Lynch, F. A. Lewis, A. T. R. Axon, D. S. Tompkins, M. F. Dixon, and P. Quirke. 1992. Identification of Helicobacter pylori DNA in the mouths and stomachs of patients with gastritis using PCR. J. Clin. Pathol. 46:540-543[Abstract/Free Full Text].
11. Mapstone, N. P., D. A. F. Lynch, F. A. Lewis, A. T. R. Axon, D. S. Tompkins, M. F. Dixon, and P. Quirke. 1993. PCR identification of Helicobacter pylori in feces from gastritis patients. Lancet 341:447[Medline].
12. Marshall, B. J., and J. R. Warren. 1984. Unidentified curved bacilli in the stomach of patients with gastritis and peptic ulceration. Lancet i:1311-1315.
13. Morena-Brenes, B., R. Sierra, R. Barrantes, J. Jonason, and C. E. Nord. 1994. Helicobacter pylori in a Costa Rican dyspeptic patient population. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 13:253-257[Medline].
14. O'Toole, P. W., S. M. Logan, M. Kostrzynska, T. Wadstrom, and T. J. Trust. 1991. Isolation and biochemical and molecular analysis of a species-specific protein antigen from the gastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori. J. Bacteriol. 173:505-513[Abstract/Free Full Text].
15. Roosendaal, R., E. J. Kuipers, A. J. C. van den Brule, A. S. Pena, A. M. Uyterlinde, J. M. M. Walboomers, S. G. M. Meuwissen, and J. de Graaff. 1994. Importance of the fiberoptic endoscope cleaning procedure for detection of Helicobacter pylori in gastric biopsy specimens by PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 32:1123-1126[Abstract/Free Full Text].
16. Tomb, J. F., O. White, A. R. Kerlavage, R. A. Clayton, G. G. Sutton, R. D. Fleischmann, K. A. Ketchum, H. P. Klenk, S. Gill, B. A. Dougherty, K. Nelson, J. Quackenbush, L. Zhou, E. F. Kirkness, S. Peterson, B. Loftus, D. Richardson, R. Dodson, H. G. Khalak, A. Glodek, K. McKenney, L. M. Fitzegerald, N. Lee, M. D. Adams, J. C. Venter, et al. 1997. The complete genome sequence of the gastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori. Nature 388:539-547[Medline].
17. Valentine, J. L., R. R. Arthur, H. L. T. Mobley, and J. D. Dick. 1991. Detection of Helicobacter pylori by using the polymerase chain reaction. J. Clin. Microbiol. 29:689-695[Abstract/Free Full Text].
18. van Zwet, A. A., J. C. Thijs, A. M. D. Kooistra-Smid, J. Schirm, and J. A. M. Snijder. 1994. Use of PCR with feces for detection of Helicobacter pylori infection in patients. J. Clin. Microbiol. 32:1346-1348[Abstract/Free Full Text].

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, March 1999, p. 772-774, Vol. 37, No. 3
0095-1137/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.


This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Paraschos, S., Magiatis, P., Mitakou, S., Petraki, K., Kalliaropoulos, A., Maragkoudakis, P., Mentis, A., Sgouras, D., Skaltsounis, A.-L. (2007). In Vitro and In Vivo Activities of Chios Mastic Gum Extracts and Constituents against Helicobacter pylori. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51: 551-559 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Minami, M., Ohta, M., Ohkura, T., Ando, T., Torii, K., Hasegawa, T., Goto, H. (2006). Use of a Combination of Brushing Technique and the Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Method as a Novel, Rapid, and Safe System for Detection of Helicobacter pylori.. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 4032-4037 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Weiss, T W, Kvakan, H, Kaun, C, Prager, M, Speidl, W S, Zorn, G, Pfaffenberger, S, Huk, I, Maurer, G, Huber, K, Wojta, J (2006). No evidence for a direct role of Helicobacter pylori and Mycoplasma pneumoniae in carotid artery atherosclerosis. J. Clin. Pathol. 59: 1186-1190 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Posteraro, P., Branca, G., Sanguinetti, M., Ranno, S., Cammarota, G., Rahimi, S., De Carlo, M., Posteraro, B., Fadda, G. (2006). Rapid detection of clarithromycin resistance in Helicobacter pylori using a PCR-based denaturing HPLC assay. J Antimicrob Chemother 57: 71-78 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Elsheikh, M. N., Mahfouz, M. E. (2005). Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori DNA in Recurrent Aphthous Ulcerations in Mucosa-Associated Lymphoid Tissues of the Pharynx. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 131: 804-808 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Ameriso, S. F., Villamil, A. R., Zedda, C., Parodi, J. C., Garrido, S., Sarchi, M. I., Schultz, M., Boczkowski, J., Sevlever, G. E. (2005). Heme Oxygenase-1 Is Expressed in Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaques Infected by Helicobacter pylori and Is More Prevalent in Asymptomatic Subjects. Stroke 36: 1896-1900 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Huang, Y, Fan, X-G, Wang, Z-M, Zhou, J-H, Tian, X-F, Li, N (2004). Identification of helicobacter species in human liver samples from patients with primary hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Clin. Pathol. 57: 1273-1277 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Shahamat, M., Alavi, M., Watts, J. E. M., Gonzalez, J. M., Sowers, K. R., Maeder, D. W., Robb, F. T. (2004). Development of Two PCR-Based Techniques for Detecting Helical and Coccoid Forms of Helicobacter pylori. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 3613-3619 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Sgouras, D., Maragkoudakis, P., Petraki, K., Martinez-Gonzalez, B., Eriotou, E., Michopoulos, S., Kalantzopoulos, G., Tsakalidou, E., Mentis, A. (2004). In Vitro and In Vivo Inhibition of Helicobacter pylori by Lactobacillus casei Strain Shirota. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70: 518-526 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Lim, C.-Y., Lee, K.-H., Cho, M.-J., Chang, M.-W., Kim, S.-Y., Myong, N.-H., Lee, W.-K., Rhee, K.-H., Kook, Y.-H. (2003). Detection of Helicobacter pylori in Gastric Mucosa of Patients with Gastroduodenal Diseases by PCR-Restriction Analysis Using the RNA Polymerase Gene (rpoB). J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 3387-3391 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Dowsett, S.A., Kowolik, M.J. (2003). ORAL HELICOBACTER PYLORI: CAN WE STOMACH IT?. CROBM 14: 226-233 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Tomasini, M. L., Zanussi, S., Sozzi, M., Tedeschi, R., Basaglia, G., De Paoli, P. (2003). Heterogeneity of cag Genotypes in Helicobacterpylori Isolates from Human Biopsy Specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 976-980 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Fernando, N., Holton, J., Vaira, D., DeSilva, M., Fernando, D. (2002). Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori in Sri Lanka as Determined by PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 2675-2676 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Pena, J. A., McNeil, K., Fox, J. G., Versalovic, J. (2002). Molecular Evidence of Helicobacter cinaedi Organisms in Human Gastric Biopsy Specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 1511-1513 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Ameriso, S. F., Fridman, E. A., Leiguarda, R. C., Sevlever, G. E., Spence, J. D. (2001). Detection of Helicobacter pylori in Human Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaques Editorial Comment. Stroke 32: 385-391 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lu, J.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, C.-H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lu, J.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, C.-H.

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»