Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, March 1999, p. 864-866, Vol. 37, No. 3
0095-1137/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Evaluation of the Fungitest Kit by Using Strains
from Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Patients: Study of Azole
Drug Susceptibility
F.
Witthuhn,1,*
D.
Toubas,1
I.
Béguinot,2
D.
Aubert,1
C.
Rouger,2
G.
Remy,2 and
J. M.
Pinon1
Laboratoire de Parasitologie
Mycologie,
Equipe 4 INSERM U 314, EA 2070, IFR 53,1 and
Service des Maladies Infectieuses,2
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims, France
Received 4 June 1998/Returned for modification 30 September
1998/Accepted 12 December 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
One hundred eighteen Candida clinical isolates from
human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients were tested for their
susceptibilities to fluconazole and itraconazole by Fungitest and the
National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards MIC method.
Fungitest results depended on both yeast species and antifungal agents. This test is able to detect sensitive strains (97% agreement with results of the MIC method in tests with fluconazole and 84% agreement in tests with itraconazole) but has a poor capacity to detect resistant
strains (26% agreement in tests with fluconazole and 5% agreement in
tests with itraconazole).
 |
TEXT |
Oropharyngeal candidiasis (OPC) is
the most common fungal infection in patients infected with the human
immunodeficiency virus (HIV), occurring in up to 90% of these patients
(6). For several years, OPC has been treated effectively
with azole antifungal compounds. Fluconazole (FLCZ), one of the most
commonly used azoles, has been found to be orally active, weakly toxic,
extremely effective, and well tolerated, and treatment with this
compound is simple (7). Unfortunately, extensive use of the
drug for treatment or prophylaxis has led to treatment failure for an
increasing number of patients (12). FLCZ resistance was
found in 43% of HIV-infected patients (17). Itraconazole
(ITCZ) may serve as an effective antifungal agent in patients with OPC
nonresponsive to FLCZ (1, 14, 16), because use of
amphotericin B is limited due to its toxicity and lack of patient
compliance. Furthermore, many works suggest that the results from in
vitro susceptibility testing of FLCZ, and perhaps ITCZ, have some
utility in predicting the clinical outcome of patients with
AIDS-associated OPC (5, 9, 11).
During the last 10 years, considerable progress has been made in the
standardization of antifungal susceptibility testing. A reference broth
dilution method for determining the MIC, approved standard M27-A, was
proposed by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards
(NCCLS) (13). The M27-A reference standard document provides
guidelines for establishing interpretative breakpoints that indicate
reduced susceptibility and resistance to these two widely used
antifungal agents (FLCZ and ITCZ). However, this method is
time-consuming and difficult to use as a routine technique. Thus, new
methods that are easier to perform have recently been developed
(2, 3, 8, 10). Fungitest (Sanofi-Pasteur, Marnes la
Coquette, France), presented in the form of a microplate, is one of
them. The Fungitest kit was evaluated by Davey et al. (4)
with different clinical isolates. Their results indicated that few
strains were resistant to FLCZ (6.5%) and ITCZ (5%). In this study,
we focused on strains from HIV-infected patients, because of the
existence of a high level of azole agent resistance among HIV strains.
We compared the results obtained, for FLCZ and ITCZ, by Fungitest and
the NCCLS microdilution plate method.
Over the course of 1 year, 118 clinical isolates from HIV-infected
patients suffering from OPC were tested prospectively by these two
tests. The strains were obtained from 50 patients after 85 samplings by
washing patient mouths with 10 ml of sterile 0.9% NaCl solution. This
work included 76 Candida albicans isolates, 21 Candida
glabrata isolates, 21 other Candida isolates (9 of which were Candida krusei, 7 of which were Candida
tropicalis, 3 of which were Candida kefyr, 1 of which
was Candida lusitaniae, and 1 of which was Candida
inconspicua). C. albicans was identified by
conventional methods (determination of assimilation profiles by the
Auxacolor kit [Sanofi-Pasteur] and chlamydospore production), but
these tests did not allow the detection of Candida
dubliniensis. Two reference strains, Candida
parapsilosis (ATCC 22019) and C. krusei (ATCC 6258),
were incorporated in this study as quality control isolates.
Fungitest was used to study the growth of yeast in the presence of two
of the six antifungal agents present and at two different concentrations. Growth assessment was based on color change of a redox
indicator. The breakpoint concentrations used in this kit were 8 and 64 µg/ml for FLCZ and 0.5 and 4 µg/ml for ITCZ. The obtained results
allowed us to classify the strains into (i) inhibited strains, which
exhibited no growth at the two antifungal concentrations; (ii)
intermediate strains, which exhibited growth only at the low antifungal
concentration; and (iii) noninhibited strains, which exhibited growth
at the two antifungal concentrations.
Fungitest was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions,
and the broth microdilution method was performed according to the
guidelines of NCCLS document M27-A (13). The NCCLS
microdilution test was performed in 96-well microplates. Yeast
suspensions was prepared in RPMI 1640 medium buffered with MOPS
(morpholinepropanesulfonic acid) buffer to get a final inoculum
concentration of about 0.5 × 103 to 2.5 × 103 organisms/ml. The microplates were incubated at 37°C
and read after 48 h. The MICs were determined by
spectrophotometric reading at a wavelength of 492 nm as the lowest
concentration at which there was 80% growth inhibition compared with
that in a drug-free control.
The breakpoints established for FLCZ and ITCZ according to the NCCLS
guidelines do not correspond to breakpoints selected for Fungitest.
Here, the Fungitest breakpoints (8 and 64 µg/ml for FLCZ and 0.5 and
4 µg/ml for ITCZ) were applied to the MIC method to permit
comparisons. The strains are considered resistant with an FLCZ MIC of
64 µg/ml and an ITCZ MIC of
4 µg/ml. The reference strains
showed the susceptibility patterns expected with the two techniques:
FLCZ MICs of 4 to 8 µg/ml and ITCZ MICs of 0.125 to 0.25 µg/ml for
C. parapsilosis; FLCZ MICs of 16 to 32 µg/ml and ITCZ MICs
of 0.25 to 0.50 µg/ml for C. krusei.
The results with FLCZ and ITCZ for clinical isolates are presented as
Tables 1 and
2, respectively. In our tested
population, 31 isolates (26%) of Candida spp. were FLCZ
resistant (MIC
64 µg/ml) and 39 isolates (33%) were ITCZ resistant
(MIC
4 µg/ml).
The MIC of FLCZ for 64 of the 66 inhibited strains (97%) was
8
µg/ml. For eight of nine of the noninhibited strains (88%) MICs were
64 µg/ml. However, for only 8 of 22 intermediate strains of
C. albicans, 6 of 16 strains of C. glabrata, and
4 of 5 strains of the other species, MICs were between 8 and 64 µg/ml. For more than half (53%) of the intermediate strains (12 of
22 strains of C. albicans, 10 of 16 strains of C. glabrata, and 1 of 5 strains of the other species) MICs were
64
µg/ml.
For 55 of the 65 inhibited strains (84%) ITCZ MICs were
0.5 µg/ml.
For only two (C. glabrata) of the four noninhibited strains, MICs were
4 µg/ml. For only 9 of 24 intermediate strains of
C. albicans, 1 of 16 strains of C. glabrata, and
5 of 10 strains of the other species, ITCZ MICs were between 0.5 and 4 µg/ml. For the 35 intermediate and misclassified strains, 33 (15 of 24 strains of C. albicans, 15 of 16 strains of
C. glabrata, and 3 of 10 strains of the other species) MICs
were
4 µg/ml.
In tests with the two antifungal agents, a majority of C. glabrata strains (10 of 16 with FLCZ, 15 of 16 with ITCZ) were
intermediate strains by Fungitest but were resistant strains by the MIC
method. The difference between the results of the two techniques can be explained by the difficult growth of C. glabrata on a
majority of the commonly used incubation media.
Furthermore, only 8 of the 31 strains (26%) resistant by the MIC
method to FLCZ and 2 of the 39 strains (5%) resistant to ITCZ were
determined to be noninhibited strains by Fungitest. The results of this
test are dependent on the yeast species tested and antifungal agents used.
These results confirm the difficulty presented by Davey et al.
(4) of determining the susceptibilities of strains by
Fungitest. In conclusion, the results of Fungitest are in good
agreement with those of the NCCLS microdilution plate method with
inhibited strains (97% with FLCZ and 84% with ITCZ), but it is better
to verify the results with intermediate strains by another method. The
Fungitest method with broth medium has the advantages of being easy to
read (with its colored indicator) and easy to use. Nevertheless, the
major inconvenience of Fungitest is its limited ability to detect
resistant strains, particularly those resistant to ITCZ.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Sanofi-Pasteur for supplying the Fungitest kit.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Laboratoire de
Parasitologie
Mycologie, Hôpital Maison Blanche, 45, rue
Cognacq-Jay, 51092 Reims Cedex, France. Phone: (33) 3 26 78 42 20. Fax:
(33) 3 26 78 73 28. E-mail: jmpinon{at}chu-reims.fr.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Cartledge, J. D.,
J. Midgley,
M. Youle, and B. G. Gazzard.
1994.
Itraconazole cyclodextrin solution effective treatment for HIV-related candidosis unresponsive to other azole therapy.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
33:1071-1073[Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Clancy, C. J., and H. Nguyen.
1997.
Comparison of a photometric method with standardized methods of antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
35:2878-2882[Abstract].
|
| 3.
|
Colombo, A. L.,
F. Barchiesi,
D. A. McGough, and M. G. Rinaldi.
1995.
Comparison of Etest and National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards broth macrodilution method for azole antifungal susceptibility testing.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
33:535-540[Abstract].
|
| 4.
|
Davey, K. G.,
A. D. Holmes,
E. M. Johnson,
A. Szekely, and D. W. Warnock.
1998.
Comparative evaluation of Fungitest and broth microdilution methods for antifungal drug susceptibility testing of Candida species and Cryptococcus neoformans.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
36:926-930[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Denning, D. W.,
G. G. Baily, and S. V. Hood.
1997.
Azole resistance in Candida.
Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.
16:261-280[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Feigal, D. W.,
M. H. Katz,
D. Greenspan,
J. Westenhouse,
W. Winkelstein,
W. Lang,
M. Samuel,
S. P. Buchbinder,
N. A. Hessol,
A. R. Lifson,
G. W. Rutherford,
A. Moss,
D. Osmond,
S. Shiboski, and J. S. Greenspan.
1991.
The prevalence of oral lesions in HIV-infected homosexual and bisexual men of three San Francisco epidemiological cohorts.
AIDS
5:519-525[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Galgiani, J. N.
1990.
Fluconazole, a new antifungal agent.
Ann. Intern. Med.
113:177-179. (Editorial.)
|
| 8.
|
Gari-Toussaint, M.,
D. Delpech,
G. Pagliardini, and Y. Le Fichoux.
1996.
Adaptation de l'ATB-Fungus à la détermination de la sensibilité des levures au fluconazole. Comparaison avec les concentrations minimales inhibitrices et les résultats thérapeutiques.
J. Mycol. Med.
6:72-75.
|
| 9.
|
Ghannoum, M. A.
1996.
Is antifungal susceptibility testing useful in guiding fluconazole therapy?
Clin. Infect. Dis.
22(Suppl. 2):S161-S165.
|
| 10.
|
Kretschmar, M.,
T. Nichterlein,
P. Kuntz, and H. Hof.
1996.
Rapid detection of susceptibility to fluconazole in Candida species by a bioluminescence assay of intracellular ATP.
Mycology
25:117-121.
|
| 11.
|
Laguna, F.,
J. L. Rodriguez-Tudela,
J. V. Martinez-Suarez,
R. Polo,
E. Valencia,
T. M. Diaz-Guerra,
F. Dronda, and F. Pulido.
1997.
Patterns of fluconazole susceptibility in isolates from human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients with oropharyngeal candidiasis due to Candida albicans.
Clin. Infect. Dis.
24:124-130[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Maenza, J. R.,
J. C. Keruly,
R. D. Moore,
R. E. Chaisson,
M. G. Merz, and J. E. Gallant.
1996.
Risk factor for fluconazole-resistant candidiasis in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients.
J. Infect. Dis.
173:219-225[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards.
1997.
Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts. Approved standard M27-A.
National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
|
| 14.
|
Pfaller, M. A.,
J. H. Rex, and M. G. Rinaldi.
1997.
Antifungal susceptibility testing: advances and potential clinical applications.
Clin. Infect. Dis.
24:776-784[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Revankar, S. G.,
W. R. Kirkpatrick,
R. K. McAtee,
O. P. Dib,
A. W. Fothergill,
S. W. Redding,
M. G. Rinaldi, and F. Patterson.
1996.
Detection and significance of fluconazole resistance in oropharyngeal candidiasis in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients.
J. Infect. Dis.
174:821-827[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Ruhke, M.,
A. Eigler,
I. Tennagen,
B. Geiseler,
E. Engelmann, and M. Trautmann.
1994.
Emergence of fluconazole-resistant strains of Candida albicans in patients with recurrent oropharyngeal candidosis and human immunodeficiency virus infection.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
32:2092-2098[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Tumbarello, M.,
E. Tacconelli,
G. Caldarola,
G. Morace,
R. Cauda, and L. Ortona.
1997.
Fluconazole resistant oral candidiasis in HIV-infected patients.
Oral Dis. Suppl.
1:S110-S112.
|
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, March 1999, p. 864-866, Vol. 37, No. 3
0095-1137/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Rex, J. H., Pfaller, M. A., Walsh, T. J., Chaturvedi, V., Espinel-Ingroff, A., Ghannoum, M. A., Gosey, L. L., Odds, F. C., Rinaldi, M. G., Sheehan, D. J., Warnock, D. W.
(2001). Antifungal Susceptibility Testing: Practical Aspects and Current Challenges. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
14: 643-658
[Abstract]
[Full Text]