This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow An author's correction has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hudspeth, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by Goldstein, E. J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hudspeth, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by Goldstein, E. J. C.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, June 1999, p. 2003-2006, Vol. 37, No. 6
0095-1137/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Characterization of Bacteroides forsythus Strains from Cat and Dog Bite Wounds in Humans and Comparison with Monkey and Human Oral Strains

M. K. Hudspeth,1,2 S. Hunt Gerardo,1 M. F. J. Maiden,3 D. M. Citron,1 and E. J. C. Goldstein1,4,*

R. M. Alden Research Laboratory, Santa Monica-UCLA Medical Center, Santa Monica, California 904041; Naval Health Research Center, San Diego, California 921862; Department of Periodontal Microbiology, Forsyth Dental Center, Boston, Massachusetts 021153; and UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California 900244

Received 9 November 1998/Returned for modification 13 February 1999/Accepted 20 March 1999


    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Bacteroides forsythus strains recovered from cat and dog bite wound infections in humans (n = 3), monkey oral strains (n = 3), and the human oral ATCC 43037 type strain were characterized by using phenotypic characteristics, enzymatic tests, whole cell fatty acid analysis, sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) analysis, PCR fingerprinting, and 16S rDNA (genes coding for rRNA) sequencing. All three bite wound isolates grew on brucella agar supplemented with 5% sheep blood, vitamin K1, and hemin. These strains, unlike the ATCC strain and previously described monkey oral and human clinical strains, did not require N-acetylmuramic acid supplementation for growth as pure cultures. However, their phenotypic characteristics, except for catalase production, were similar to those of previously identified strains. PCR fingerprinting analysis showed differences in band patterns from the ATCC strain. Also, SDS-PAGE and whole cell fatty acid analysis indicated that the dog and cat bite wound strains were similar but not identical to the human B. forsythus ATCC 43037 type strain and the monkey oral strains. The rDNA sequence analysis indicated that the three bite wound isolates had 99.93% homology with each other and 98.9 and 99.22% homology with the human ATCC 43037 and monkey oral strains, respectively. These results suggest that there are host-specific variations within each group.


    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Bacteroides forsythus is found in the subgingival, gingival, and periodontal pockets of humans and is known to cause periodontal disease. This organism was initially grown as part of mixed cultures from periodontal lesions and appeared as satellite colonies around other species. The fastidious nature of this organism had deterred extensive study until it was determined that B. forsythus requires exogenous N-acetylmuramic acid (NAM) for optimal growth as a pure culture (15, 16). B. forsythus was also recently found in monkey subgingival plaque samples. These strains (from Macaca fasciculans) have been described as a biotype of B. forsythus (1). In this study, we describe the characteristics of three strains isolated from infected cat and dog bites in humans as part of a nationwide study on the bacteriology of such wounds (14). In each of these patient specimens, other species of oral flora were also present. Surprisingly, these bite wound strains did not require NAM supplementation for growth as pure cultures. Therefore, we characterized these strains by phenotypic, biochemical, whole cell wall fatty acid analysis, sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), PCR fingerprinting, and rDNA (genes coding for rRNA) sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene. These results showed that these strains are B. forsythus. To our knowledge, this is the first report of isolation of B. forsythus from a source other than the oral cavity (14).


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Bacterial strains and culture conditions. Three clinical isolates recovered from dog (n = 2) and cat (n = 1) bite wounds in humans, three monkey oral strains, and the type strain of B. forsythus, ATCC 43037, a human oral isolate, were studied. All strains were taken from stock cultures frozen in 20% skim milk at -70°C and subcultured twice onto brucella agar supplemented with 5% sheep blood, vitamin K1, and hemin (Anaerobe Systems, San Jose, Calif.), except that the monkey strains and ATCC strain required 0.001% NAM (Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, Mo.) as an additional supplement. All strains were incubated in an anaerobic chamber (Anaerobe Systems) at 37°C for 5 to 7 days.

The NAM-supplemented medium was prepared by first preparing brucella agar as described by the manufacturer (Difco, Detroit, Mich.) and then adding vitamin K1 (1 µg/ml) and hemin (5 µg/ml), prior to autoclaving. After the agar was cooled in a 50°C water bath, defibrinated sheep blood (5%) and filter-sterilized stock NAM solution (final concentration, 0.001%) were added. Plates containing approximately 20 ml were prepared.

Substrate tests. The RapID Ana II kit (Remel, Norcross, Ga.) was used for biochemical analysis of all strains. In addition, WEE-TAB triple-substrate tubes (Key Scientific, Round Rock, Tex.) were used to test for trypsin-like activity and chymotrypsin. The two kits were inoculated, and the results were interpreted according to the manufacturer's instructions. The test for esculin hydrolysis was performed by using prereduced anaerobically sterilized (PRAS) medium (Remel). These tubes were inoculated with 0.1 ml of a suspension of bacteria with a McFarland standard of 0.5 and incubated at 37°C for 5 to 7 days. For the monkey strains and the human ATCC strains of B. forsythus, 0.1 ml of the 1% stock solution of NAM was added to each tube prior to incubation. The results were interpreted according to the manufacturer's instructions. All isolates were tested for catalase production with 10% hydrogen peroxide, for spot indole with para-dimethyl-aminocinnamaldehyde reagent, and for susceptibility to special potency antibiotic disks by standard procedures (12).

Whole cell fatty acid analysis. The isolates were referred to the Anaerobe Laboratory at the Veterinary Medicine Teaching Hospital at the University of California at Davis. Whole cell fatty acid analysis was performed by standard procedures as previously described (12).

PCR fingerprinting analysis. Several bacterial colonies of each isolate were suspended in 1 ml of sterile distilled water to a turbidity approximately equal to a McFarland standard of 3. Two hundred microliters of the cell suspension was removed and pelleted, resuspended in 100 to 200 µl of InstaGene Matrix (Bio-Rad, Hercules, Calif.), and then incubated at 50°C for 15 to 30 min. Cell solutions were vortexed and then heated for 8 to 10 min at 100°C. After the cell solutions were vortexed, cell lysates containing the DNA extract were centrifuged to remove cellular debris. Cell lysates were stored at -20°C until use. Thirty-five microliters of each cell lysate supernatant was subjected to PCR amplification using a single primer derived from the tDNA intergenic spacer region (T3B [5'-AGGTCGCGGGTTCGAATCC-3']) (2, 17). An ultrapure preparation of Escherichia coli B DNA (Sigma) was used as a positive control for PCR amplification. The negative control had no DNA added. Amplification reactions and absorbance profile analyses were performed as previously described (2). Briefly, amplification was performed as follows: 35 cycles, with each cycle consisting of 30 s at 94°C, 30 s at 50°C, and 2 min at 72°C.

SDS-PAGE analysis. The bite wound and monkey strains were compared to the B. forsythus ATCC type strain by SDS-PAGE of whole-cell protein profiles. This is an established technique for the definitive phenotypic identification of strains as known species (5, 6, 8, 11). Briefly, a dense suspension of each strain in distilled water was sonicated, mixed with an equal volume of treatment buffer containing SDS and mercaptoethanol, and boiled for 5 min. A drop of phenol red tracking dye was then added to each preparation. An aliquot (2 µl) of each preparation was loaded into a well of a 10% acrylamide Ready Gel (Bio-Rad). Electrophoresis was run at a constant current of 30 mA, and the gels were stained by using the Silver Stain Plus kit (Bio-Rad). The protein profiles of both sets of the isolates were visually compared with that of the B. forsythus ATCC type strain run on the same gel.

16S rDNA sequencing. The MicroSeq 16S rRNA Gene Kit (PE Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.) was used following the manufacturer's recommended procedures. The kit uses six forward (F) and six reverse (R) primers, giving on average fourfold coverage of the 16S rDNA. Cells of each strain harvested from 3-day-old cultures on NAM-supplemented medium were extracted by using Gene Releaser following the manufacturer's microwave protocol. The 16S rDNA was PCR amplified from each extract with the 5F forward primer and E94 reverse primer (R1540 reverse primer modified with an additional wobble base). Following spin column purification, amplification products were cycle sequenced using the kit reagents, and the products were analyzed on an automated sequencer (model 377; PE Applied Biosystems).

16S rRNA data analysis. The consensus sequence for each strain was assembled with the Auto Assembler software (PE Applied Biosystems) and analyzed with a custom program set for sequence editing, alignment, secondary structure comparison, similarity matrix generation, and dendrogram construction for 16S rDNA data written in Microsoft Quick BASIC (9). DNA sequences were aligned as previously described (9), and similarity matrices were constructed, correcting for multiple base changes at single positions (4). Phylogenetic trees were constructed by the neighbor-joining method (10).


    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

In this study, we characterized three presumptive B. forsythus strains isolated from cat and dog bite wounds in humans. The bite wound strains grew on brucella agar supplemented with 5% sheep blood, vitamin K1, and hemin. After 5 to 7 days of incubation at 37°C under anaerobic conditions, all strains grew to a diameter of 1.0 mm and were gray-to-tan, circular, entire, opaque colonies.

Biochemical profiles. The three bite wound strains showed similar biochemical profiles on both the RapID Ana II and WEE TAB systems (Table 1). They were catalase positive, susceptible to special potency disks of kanamycin and colistin, resistant to vancomycin, and positive for trypsin-like activity. The colony morphology and biochemical profiles identified these three bite wound strains as B. forsythus. However, they differed from the type strain because they did not require NAM supplementation and were catalase positive. They differed from the monkey oral strains by testing negative for phenylalanine aminopeptidase (PAL), whereas the monkey oral strains were catalase negative and positive for PAL (Table 1).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1.   Biochemical reactions of B. forsythus

Whole cell fatty acid analysis. The whole cell wall fatty acid analysis indicated that although all strains had similarities, there were differences in some of the major fatty acid constituents (Table 2). The major constituent for both the three bite wound and the human oral ATCC type strain was 15:0 anteiso fatty acid methyl ester (15:0 anteiso FAME) (12-methyl tetradecanoic acid). The three monkey oral strains differed from the other strains in that they contained 15:0 anteiso FAME to a lesser extent. In addition, they contained larger amounts of the fatty acids 18:2 cis-9,12 FAME, 18:1 cis-9-FAME, 16:0 FAME, and 18:0 FAME.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2.   Cellular fatty acid composition of B. forsythus isolates

SDS-PAGE. The protein profiles of the monkey and bite wound isolates were compared to that of the human ATCC type strain of B. forsythus (Fig. 1). All of the isolates had protein profiles very similar to each other but not identical to that of the human type strain. All of the nonhuman isolates (except monkey oral isolate RMA 8563) showed the prominent 200-kDa S-layer protein bands. The three monkey isolates were most similar to each other, and the three bite wound strains were most similar to each other.


View larger version (127K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.   SDS-PAGE of whole-cell proteins of B. forsythus type strain and isolates from monkey dental plaque and animal bite wounds. Lane 1, human strain, B. forsythus ATCC 43037; lane 2, monkey isolate RMA 8464, lane 3, monkey isolate RMA 8563; lane 4, monkey isolate RMA 8562; lane 5, dog bite wound isolate RMA 7251; lane 6, dog bite wound isolate RMA 8286; lane 7, cat bite wound isolate RMA 8360.

PCR fingerprinting. PCR of the seven B. forsythus strains using the single primer T3B revealed significant differences in the banding patterns among these strains (Fig. 2). Bite wound strain RMA 8286 (lane 8) and RMA 8360 (lane 7) had a band in common at 896 bp, which was not shared by any of the other isolates. A single band at 420 bp was common to all isolates. Only monkey oral strains RMA 8562 (lane 5) and RMA 8563 (lane 6) had other bands in common with the human oral strain ATCC 43037 (1,158 and 731 bp). These two monkey strains appeared to have identical PCR fingerprint profiles, with common bands at 1,571, 1,158, 731, 420, and 371 bp. Monkey oral strain RMA 8464 (lane 4) had no bands in common with the other isolates except for the band at 420 bp. Other than the monkey oral strains RMA 8562 and RMA 8563, each of the strains analyzed had a unique PCR fingerprint pattern. None of the fingerprints was identical to that of the human oral strain ATCC 43037. 


View larger version (132K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2.   PCR fingerprint analysis. Seven B. forsythus isolates were analyzed by PCR fingerprinting using the single primer T3B. Lane 1, ultrapure preparation of E. coli B DNA; lane 2, negative control; lanes 3 and 11, molecular size ladder; lane 4, RMA 8464 (monkey oral strain); lane 5, RMA 8562 (monkey oral strain); lane 6, RMA 8563 (monkey oral strain); lane 7, RMA 8360 (cat bite strain); lane 8, RMA 8286 (dog bite strain); lane 9, RMA 7251 (dog bite strain); lane 10, ATCC 43037 (human oral strain).

16S rDNA sequencing. The relationships among the 16S rDNA from the monkey isolates, the bite wound isolates, and the human oral ATCC type strain of B. forsythus were examined (Fig. 3). The seven strains differed in 21 base positions in the 16S rDNA. The animal bite wound isolates clustered together with a similarity of 99.93%. They were 98.9% similar to the human B. forsythus ATCC strain and 99.22% similar to the monkey isolates. The monkey isolates clustered together with a similarity of 99.95% and were more similar (98.96%) to the human type strain than the bite strains were.


View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3.   Dendrogram of 16S rRNA gene sequence relationships between the B. forsythus type strain and the monkey and bite wound isolates. The closest phylogenetic relatives of B. forsythus, Bacteroides distasonis and Bacteroides merdae, are included for reference. The bar represents 10% sequence difference.


    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Three strains from dog and cat bite wounds in humans were studied by conventional tests and were found to be similar in their colonial morphology and various biochemical activities to previously described strains of B. forsythus. For example, they produced a trypsin-like enzyme, and were alpha -fucosidase and esculin hydrolase positive (1, 3, 7, 13, 15). The strains were additionally identified as B. forsythus by SDS-PAGE and whole cell fatty acid analysis. Furthermore, PCR fingerprinting analysis showed that a single band was found to be common to all strains. The genetic relatedness of these strains was further established by DNA sequence analysis. It was found that the 16S rDNA sequences of the bite wound strains were 98.9% similar to the human oral ATCC type strain.

Although the three cat and dog bite strains were isolated from human wounds, presumably the strains originated from the oral flora of dogs and cats. B. forsythus has been isolated from the oral cavity of primates but has not been previously reported as occurring in other sites or species. These three strains were also unusual in that they did not require NAM supplementation for optimal growth in pure culture as previously described for B. forsythus (15, 16). This is important because a requirement for NAM has been one of the main criteria for identification of this species. Other differences were that the bite wound strains of B. forsythus were catalase positive and the SDS-PAGE showed some differences, while the PCR fingerprinting data showed band patterns that were quite diverse from that of the human oral type strain ATCC 43037.

For comparison, we studied three monkey strains of B. forsythus and found that, overall, our results were similar to published results for other monkey strains (1). One major difference from the bite wound and human strains was that the monkey strains were positive for PAL. The monkey strains required NAM supplementation for growth, like the human strain. In addition, the whole cell wall fatty acid analysis and PCR fingerprinting shared some similarities with the bite wound and human strains but were more diverse in their fatty acid constituents. The comparison of the 16S rDNA sequence analysis showed that the monkey strains were 98.96 and 99.22% similar to the human and bite wound strains, respectively.

The high similarity (>= 98.9%) of 16S rDNA sequences from all the strains examined suggests they belong to a single species; however, DNA-DNA homology studies will be necessary for this to be confirmed. Although there is a high degree of similarity between the 16S rDNA sequences of all the B. forsythus strains, the sequences can be grouped according to their host species, suggesting the presence of host-specific subtypes within the species.

B. forsythus has been studied extensively and found to be a key organism associated with human periodontal disease (3, 13, 15). Previous studies have indicated that, due to the fastidious nature of these organisms, the incidence of these strains has probably been underestimated (3, 13, 15). In our previous study, we had isolated for the first time B. forsythus strains from dog and cat bite wounds in humans (14). The presence of these strains in an extraoral infection indicates that the periodontal pocket is not the only site in which this organism can colonize and potentially contribute to the infection process. In addition, the isolation of these strains from nonprimate origins shows that this organism is associated not just with humans or primates, as had been previously described (1, 3, 13, 15), but also exists in the oral cavities of dogs and cats.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Spencer Jang, Veterinary Medicine Teaching Hospital, University of California at Davis, for performing whole cell wall fatty acid analysis on these strains. Pamela Braham, University of Washington, kindly provided the monkey oral strains.


    FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: R. M. Alden Research Laboratory, Santa Monica-U.C.L.A. Medical Center, 1250 16th St., Santa Monica, CA 90404. Phone: (310) 315-1511. Fax: (310) 315-3662. E-mail: ejcgmd{at}aol.com.


    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

1. Braham, P. H., and B. Moncla. 1992. Rapid presumptive identification and further characterization of Bacteroides forsythus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 30:649-654[Abstract/Free Full Text].
2. Claros, M. C., D. M. Citron, S. Hunt Gerardo, E. J. C. Goldstein, G. Schönian, T. Montag, B. Hampel, and A. C. Rodloff. 1996. Characterization of indole-negative Bacteroides fragilis group species with use of polymerase chain reaction fingerprinting and resistance profiles. Clin. Infect. Dis. 23:66-72[Medline].
3. Gersdorf, H., A. Meissner, K. Pelz, G. Krekeler, and U. B. Göbel. 1993. Identification of Bacteroides forsythus in subgingival plaque from patients with advanced periodontitis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 31:941-946[Abstract/Free Full Text].
4. Jukes, T. H., and C. R. Cantor. 1969. Evolution of protein molecules, p. 21-132. In H. N. Munro (ed.), Mammalian protein metabolism III. Academic Press, New York, N.Y.
5. Kinder, S. A., K. S. Kornman, and S. C. Holt. 1989. Characterization of selected gram-negative oral microorganisms by SDS-PAGE. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 4:52-56[Medline].
6. Maiden, M. F., and A. Tanner. 1991. Identification of oral yeasts by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 6:187-190[Medline].
7. Maiden, M. F. J., A. Tanner, and P. J. Macuch. 1996. Rapid characterization of periodontal bacterial isolates by using fluorogenic substrate tests. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:376-384[Abstract].
8. Moore, W. E. C., D. E. Hash, L. V. Holdeman, and E. P. Cato. 1980. Polyacrylamide slab gel electrophoresis of soluble proteins for studies of bacterial floras. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 39:900-907[Abstract/Free Full Text].
9. Paster, B. J., and F. E. Dewhirst. 1988. Phylogeny of Campylobacter, Wolinella, Bacteroides gracilis, and Bacteroides ureolyticus by 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid sequencing. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 38:56-62[Abstract/Free Full Text].
10. Saitou, N., and M. Nei. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4:406-425[Abstract].
11. Slayne, M. A., M. J. Aldred, and W. G. Wade. 1990. A rapid, semi-automated SDS-PAGE identification system for oral anaerobic bacteria. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 68:391-395[Medline].
12. Summanen, P., E. J. Baron, D. M. Citron, C. A. Strong, H. M. Wexler, and S. M. Finegold. 1993. Wadsworth anaerobic bacteriology manual, 5th ed. Star Publishing Company, Belmont, Calif.
13. Takemoto, T., H. Kurihara, and G. Dahlen. 1997. Characterization of Bacteroides forsythus isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:1378-1381[Abstract].
14. Talan, D. A., D. M. Citron, F. M. Abrahamian, G. J. Moran, and E. J. C. Goldstein and Emergency Medicine Animal Bite Infection Study Group. 1999. Bacteriologic analysis of infected dog and cat bites. N. Engl. J. Med. 340:85-92[Abstract/Free Full Text].
15. Tanner, A. C. R., M. A. Listgarten, J. L. Ebersole, and M. N. Strzempko. 1986. Bacteroides forsythus sp. nov., a slow-growing, fusiform Bacteroides sp. from the human oral cavity. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 36:213-221.
16. Weiss, C. 1989. Dependence of proliferation of Bacteroides forsythus on exogenous N-acetylmuramic acid. Infect. Immun. 57:1757-1759[Abstract/Free Full Text].
17. Welsh, J., and M. McClelland. 1991. Genome fingerprints produced by PCR with consensus tRNA gene primers. Nucleic Acids Res. 19:861-866[Abstract/Free Full Text].


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, June 1999, p. 2003-2006, Vol. 37, No. 6
0095-1137/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Honma, K., Mishima, E., Inagaki, S., Sharma, A. (2009). The OxyR homologue in Tannerella forsythia regulates expression of oxidative stress responses and biofilm formation. Microbiology 155: 1912-1922 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow An author's correction has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hudspeth, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by Goldstein, E. J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hudspeth, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by Goldstein, E. J. C.