Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, June 1999, p. 2034-2036, Vol. 37, No. 6
0095-1137/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Oxacillin Susceptibility Testing of Staphylococci Directly from
Bactec Plus Blood Cultures by the BBL Crystal MRSA ID System
M.
Kubina,
B.
Jaulhac,*
X.
Delabranche,
C.
Lindenmann,
Y.
Piemont, and
H.
Monteil
Institut de Bactériologie,
Faculté de Médecine et Hôpitaux Universitaires de
Strasbourg, 67000 Strasbourg, France
Received 17 August 1998/Returned for modification 28 December
1998/Accepted 20 March 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
The BBL Crystal MRSA ID test (Becton Dickinson) was applied
directly to blood culture vials containing clusters of gram-positive cocci. The sensitivity and specificity of the test were 84 and 100%
and 54 and 100% for vials containing Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci, respectively. This test is a
reliable method for direct detection of methicillin resistance in
positive blood culture vials when S. aureus is identified
in parallel by rapid identification procedures.
 |
TEXT |
Detection of methicillin resistance
of staphylococci is of importance in clinical practice, especially in
blood culture isolates, since Staphylococcus aureus is a
frequent cause of nosocomial bacteremia (1). Glycopeptides
are still widely used in cases of severe disease while awaiting the
results of antibiotic susceptibility testing due to the high prevalence
of methicillin resistance in staphylococci (1). Standardized
methods of oxacillin susceptibility testing have been developed for
isolated colonies (2); therefore, the oxacillin
susceptibility result is not usually available until at least 24 h
after identification of a positive blood culture. The BBL Crystal MRSA
ID System (Becton Dickinson, Cockeysville, Md.) applied to isolated
colonies was recently reported to be an efficient, rapid, and specific
alternative method allowing the detection of methicillin resistance in
S. aureus within 4 to 6 h (4, 9, 11, 15,
16).
In the present study, our objective was to evaluate the reliability of
this test, applied directly to blood culture vials positive for
clustering gram-positive cocci, for the detection of methicillin
resistance in coagulase-positive staphylococci and coagulase-negative
staphylococci (CNS). The results of the BBL Crystal MRSA ID test were
compared to those obtained by agar disk diffusion and mecA
gene detection, the genotypic method being taken as the reference technique.
Over a 12-month period, all first blood vials (Bactec Plus aerobic/F
and anaerobic/F; Becton Dickinson) containing staphylococcal clusters
positive for Gram staining were retained for a given patient and tested
by the BBL Crystal MRSA ID test, by agar disk diffusion, and by
mecA gene detection. In order to complete rapid identification of S. aureus within the same time interval as
oxacillin susceptibility testing, the clusters of gram-positive cocci
were also identified by the coagulase tube test performed directly on
positive blood vials. Briefly, a 50-µl aliquot was aseptically removed from each culture vial and diluted in 200 µl of brain heart
broth medium (Sanofi Diagnostics Pasteur, Paris, France). After
addition of 250 µl of citrated rabbit plasma, clotting was read after
4 and 24 h of incubation at 37°C. All CNS isolates for which the
results of methicillin resistance detection by the BBL Crystal MRSA ID
test were different from those of agar disk diffusion and/or
mecA gene detection were identified by the API 32 Staph
system (BioMérieux, Marcy-L'Etoile, France). The
methicillin resistance detection test was performed by several
methods. (i) Oxacillin disk diffusion was performed in accordance with
the recommendations of the French Antibiogram Committee (3).
Tests were carried out on Mueller-Hinton agar incubated for 48 h
at 30°C and on Mueller-Hinton agar supplemented with 5% NaCl and incubated for 24 h at 37°C. (ii) The genotypic assay used the oligonucleotide mecA probe
(5'-AGAGTAGCACTCGAATTAGGCAGT-3') previously described by
Shimaoka et al. (13). This probe was 5' labeled with
[
-32P]ATP as described by Sambrook et al.
(12), and dot blot hybridization was performed as previously
described (8). After hybridization, the filters were washed
twice for 10 min (each time) at 35°C in 2× SSPE (1× SSPE is 0.18 M
NaCl, 10 mM NaH2PO4, and 1 mM EDTA [pH 7.7])
buffer containing 0.1% (wt/vol) sodium dodecyl sulfate, air dried, and
exposed overnight at
70°C to X-ray film (Fujifilm NIF) with two
intensifying screens. (iii) The BBL Crystal MRSA ID test was prepared
as follows. A 1-ml positive blood culture vial aliquot was put into a
sterile Eppendorf microtube and centrifuged for 5 min at
10,000 × g. The supernatant was discarded and the pellet was resuspended in 1.5 ml of sterile bidistilled water for
30 s to lyse erythrocytes. Isotonicity was then restored with 90 µl of sterile 5 M NaCl solution and immediate mixing. These steps
were repeated once if hemoglobin was still macroscopically present. The
pellet was then adjusted to 0.5 McFarland unit in sterile saline
buffer. Four drops of bacterial suspension were added to each of the
three wells of the BBL Crystal MRSA ID test, incubated at 37°C, and
observed after 4, 5, and 6 h of incubation. The test uses an
oxygen-sensitive fluorescent indicator in the well test which detects
oxygen consumption due to bacterial metabolism revealed with a longwave
(365-nm) UV light source (9, 11). A test was considered to
be interpretable if the well that contained no antibiotic was positive
for fluorescence and the second well containing vancomycin at 16 µg/ml was negative and was otherwise defined as uninterpretable. In
interpretable tests, the organism was considered to be methicillin
resistant (MR) if the test well containing dried oxacillin at 4 µg/ml
was positive or methicillin susceptible (MS) if the test well was
negative. Throughout the study, S. aureus ATCC 25923 and
ATCC 33592 were used as quality control organisms. Statistical
calculations were carried out by using the formula of Ilstrup
(7), taking the results of mecA detection as the reference.
Among 182 positive blood culture vials tested, 31 BBL Crystal MRSA ID
tests were excluded due to the presence within the cultures of (i) a
mixture of several bacterial species (more than one strain of
Staphylococcus or strains belonging to
Staphylococcus and to another bacterial genus) (27 tests) or
(ii) gram-positive cocci other than Staphylococcus species
(micrococci in 3 tests, enterococci in 1 test). Finally, 151 nonredundant blood culture vials were retained for further analysis.
The vials contained S. aureus in 39.1% of the cases (59 of
151) and CNS in 60.9% of the cases (92 of 151), with no discrepancies between results after 4 and 24 h of incubation in the coagulase tube test. Although some staphylococcal species other than S. aureus, such as, for instance, S. intermedius or
S. schleiferi, produce a positive coagulase test result,
their occurrence is extremely rare in clinical isolates
(10). In previous work (10), among 3,397 consecutive isolates of coagulase-positive staphylococci examined in
our laboratory, only 2, from a nasal swab and from pleural fluid, and
none from blood cultures, contained S. intermedius.
Taking the mecA probe as a reference, methicillin resistance
was present in 42.4% (25 of 59) of the S. aureus strains
and in 58.7% (54 of 92) of the CNS strains. Among the 151 vials
tested, no discrepancies were observed between the results of the two control methods, except in the case of a single S. epidermidis strain which appeared to be MS in two disk diffusion
tests but gave a positive mecA signal (Table
1). Some BBL Crystal MRSA ID tests were
uninterpretable. Their number decreased between 4 and 6 h of
incubation (Table 1). After 6 h of incubation, all vials
containing S. aureus were interpretable and only three
containing CNS (one MR S. epidermidis strain, one MR
S. haemolyticus strain, and one MS S. epidermidis
strain) remained uninterpretable. This 3.3% uninterpretable tests
could be due to slower growth, as reported by Ieven et al.
(6), who tested isolated strains and proposed use of a 2 McFarland inoculum for testing of CNS vials rather than the 0.5 McFarland inoculum recommended by the manufacturer for S. aureus.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1.
Oxacillin resistance determined by mecA gene
detection, oxacillin disk diffusion, and the BBL Crystal MRSA ID test
|
|
Among the 59 S. aureus strains, 25 were oxacillin resistant
by mecA gene detection. The BBL Crystal MRSA ID test result
was positive for 48% (12 of 25), 76% (19 of 25), and 84% (21 of 25) of these vials after 4, 5, and 6 h of incubation, respectively. Thus, four of the eight MR S. aureus strains falsely
sensitive to oxacillin in a 4-h BBL test were found to be resistant
after 6 h. All vials containing S. aureus strains
negative by mecA detection were found to contain MS strains
by the BBL Crystal MRSA ID test. Among the 92 CNS strains, 54 were MR
by mecA gene detection. The BBL Crystal MRSA ID test result
was positive for 25.9% (14 of 54), 42.6% (23 of 54), and 51.9% (28 of 54) of these vials after 4, 5, and 6 h of incubation,
respectively. In the remaining 38 vials containing
mecA-negative CNS, the BBL Crystal MRSA ID test revealed
60.5% (23 of 38), 92.1% (35 of 38), and 97.4% (37 of 38) of these
strains as MS after 4, 5, and 6 h of incubation, respectively
(Table 1). As no false methicillin resistance was detected in blood
vials containing MS strains, the specificity and positive predictive
value of the BBL Crystal MRSA ID assay were maximal (100%) for both
S. aureus and CNS after only 4 h of incubation (Table
2).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 2.
Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative
predictive values of interpretable BBL Crystal MRSA ID tests after
4, 5, and 6 h of incubation
|
|
The percentage of agreement among BBL Crystal MRSA ID tests was 93.2%
for vials containing S. aureus and 73% for those containing CNS, while the sensitivity and negative predictive value reached 84 and
89%, respectively, after 6 h for S. aureus strains.
These data are in accordance with the previous findings of Zambardi et
al. (16) for S. aureus isolates. Those
investigators observed sensitivities ranging from 71 to 100% and
negative predictive values of 95 to 100% after 4 h of incubation.
The sensitivity of the BBL Crystal MRSA ID assay to methicillin
resistance was, however, less for CNS (53.8% after a 6-h incubation
period), with only 70.6% of the MR CNS strains correctly identified
after 6 h of incubation. Hence, the results of this test should be
interpreted cautiously in the case of apparently MS CNS strains.
Automated systems such as the Vitek GPS-SA card (5) or the
MicroScan apparatus (14) can produce results within 7 to
11 h, but this type of equipment is not available in the majority of hospitals. Molecular biology techniques are still at an experimental stage, and their use is restricted to a few medical centers. The BBL
Crystal MRSA ID System could therefore represent a useful alternative
for direct susceptibility testing. This assay does not require special
equipment or expertise, is easy to perform in any laboratory, and can
be quickly integrated into routine diagnostic procedures.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We are grateful to Danielle Herb for her excellent technical assistance.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institut de
Bactériologie, 3, rue Koeberlé, 67000 Strasbourg, France.
Phone: (33) 3.88.21.19.70. Fax: (33) 3.88.25.11.13. E-mail:
benoit.jaulhac{at}medecine.u-strasbg.fr.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Bismuth, R.
1996.
Evolution de la résistance associée à S. aureus résistant à la méticilline, p. 61-81.
In
J. Etienne, and F. W. Goldstein (ed.), Les staphylocoques dorés résistants à la méticilline. Rhône Poulenc Rorer, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France.
|
| 2.
|
Chambers, H.
1997.
Methicillin resistance in staphylococci: molecular and biochemical basis and clinical implications.
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
10:781-791[Abstract].
|
| 3.
|
Comité de l'antibiogramme de la Societé Francaise de Microbiologie.
1997.
Comité de l'antibiogramme de la Société Francaise de Microbiologie: communiqué 1997.
Pathol. Biol.
45:I-XII.
|
| 4.
|
Hamilton-Miller, J.
1997.
Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus using the BBL crystal MRSA kit.
Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.
16:481[Medline]. (Letter.)
|
| 5.
|
Howard, W. J.,
B. J. Buschelman,
M. J. Bale,
M. A. Pfaller,
F. P. Koontz, and R. N. Jones.
1996.
Vitek GPS card susceptibility testing accuracy using direct inoculation from Bactec 9240 blood culture bottles.
Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.
24:109-112[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Ieven, M.,
H. Jansens,
D. Ursi,
J. Verhoeven, and H. Goossens.
1995.
Rapid detection of methicillin resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci by commercially available fluorescence test.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
33:2183-2185[Abstract].
|
| 7.
|
Ilstrup, D. M.
1990.
Statistical methods in microbiology.
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
3:219-226[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Jaulhac, B.,
M. Bes,
N. Bornstein,
Y. Piémont,
Y. Brun, and J. Fleurette.
1992.
Synthetic DNA probes for detection of genes for enterotoxins A, B, C, D, E and for TSST-1 in staphylococcal strains.
J. Appl. Bacteriol.
72:386-392[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Knapp, C. C.,
M. D. Ludwig, and J. A. Washington.
1994.
Evaluation of BBL Crystal MRSA ID system.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
32:2588-2589[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Mahoudeau, I.,
X. Delabranche,
G. Prevost,
H. Monteil, and Y. Piemont.
1997.
Frequency of isolation of Staphylococcus intermedius from humans.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
35:2153-2154[Abstract].
|
| 11.
|
Qadri, S. M. H.,
Y. Ueno,
H. Imambaccus, and E. Almodovar.
1994.
Rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by Crystal MRSA ID System.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
32:1830-1832[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Sambrook, J.,
E. F. Fristch, and T. Maniatis.
1989.
Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 13.
|
Shimaoka, M.,
M. Yoh,
A. Segawa,
Y. Takarada,
K. Yamamoto, and T. Honda.
1994.
Development of enzyme-labeled oligonucleotide probe for detection of mecA gene in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
32:1866-1869[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Waites, K. B.,
E. S. Brookings,
S. A. Moser, and B. L. Zimmer.
1998.
Direct susceptibility testing with positive BacT/Alert blood cultures by using Microscan overnight and rapid panels.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
36:2052-2056[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Wallet, F.,
M. Roussel-Delvallez, and R. Courcol.
1996.
Choice of a routine method for detecting methicillin-resistance in staphylococci.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
37:901-909[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Zambardi, G.,
J. Fleurette,
G. Schito,
R. Auckenthaler,
E. Bergogne-Berezin,
R. Hone,
A. King,
W. Lenz,
C. Lohner,
A. Makristhatis,
F. Marco,
C. Muller-Serieys,
C. Nonhoff,
I. Phillips,
P. Rohner,
M. Rotter,
K. Schaal,
M. Struelens, and A. Viebahn.
1996.
European multicentre evaluation of a commercial system for identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.
15:747-749[Medline].
|
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, June 1999, p. 2034-2036, Vol. 37, No. 6
0095-1137/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Bennett, K., Sharp, S. E.
(2008). Rapid Differentiation of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus from Blood Cultures by Use of a Direct Cefoxitin Disk Diffusion Test. J. Clin. Microbiol.
46: 3836-3838
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Maes, N., Magdalena, J., Rottiers, S., De Gheldre, Y., Struelens, M. J.
(2002). Evaluation of a Triplex PCR Assay To Discriminate Staphylococcus aureus from Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci and Determine Methicillin Resistance from Blood Cultures. J. Clin. Microbiol.
40: 1514-1517
[Abstract]
[Full Text]