Journal of Clinical Microbiology, July 1999, p. 2158-2164, Vol. 37, No. 7
0095-1137/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Identification of Burkholderia spp. in
the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory: Comparison of Conventional and
Molecular Methods
Cindy
van
Pelt,1,*
Cees M.
Verduin,1
Wil H. F.
Goessens,1
Margreet C.
Vos,1
Burkhard
Tümmler,2
Christine
Segonds,3
Frans
Reubsaet,4
Henri
Verbrugh,1 and
Alex
van Belkum1
Department of Medical Microbiology and
Infectious Diseases, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam EMCR,
3015 GD Rotterdam,1 and National
Institute of Public Health and the Environment RIVM, 3720 BA
Bilthoven,4 The Netherlands;
Klinische Forschergruppe Molekulare Pathologie der
Mukoviszidose, Zentrum Biochemie und Zentrum Kinderheilkunde,
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, D-30623 Hannover,
Germany2; and Observatoire Cepacia,
Laboratoire de Bacteriologie-Virologie-Hygiene, Hôpital
Rangueil, 31403 Toulouse Cédex 4, France3
Received 30 November 1998/Returned for modification 4 February
1999/Accepted 26 March 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
Cystic fibrosis (CF) predisposes patients to bacterial colonization
and infection of the lower airways. Several species belonging to the
genus Burkholderia are potential CF-related pathogens, but
microbiological identification may be complicated. This situation is
not in the least due to the poorly defined taxonomic status of these
bacteria, and further validation of the available diagnostic assays is
required. A total of 114 geographically diverse bacterial isolates,
previously identified in reference laboratories as Burkholderia cepacia (n = 51), B. gladioli
(n = 14), Ralstonia pickettii
(n = 6), B. multivorans
(n = 2), Stenotrophomonas maltophilia
(n = 3), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
(n = 11), were collected from environmental, clinical,
and reference sources. In addition, 27 clinical isolates putatively
identified as Burkholderia spp. were recovered from the
sputum of Dutch CF patients. All isolates were used to evaluate the
accuracy of two selective growth media, four systems for biochemical
identification (API 20NE, Vitek GNI, Vitek NFC, and MicroScan), and
three different PCR-based assays. The PCR assays amplify different
parts of the ribosomal DNA operon, either alone or in combination with
cleavage by various restriction enzymes (PCR-restriction fragment
length polymorphism [RFLP] analysis). The best system for the
biochemical identification of B. cepacia appeared to be the
API 20NE test. None of the biochemical assays successfully grouped the
B. gladioli strains. The PCR-RFLP method appeared to be the
optimal method for accurate nucleic acid-mediated identification of the
different Burkholderia spp. With this method, B. gladioli was also reliably classified in a separate group. For
the laboratory diagnosis of B. cepacia, we recommend
parallel cultures on blood agar medium and selective agar plates.
Further identification of colonies with a Burkholderia
phenotype should be performed with the API 20NE test. For final
confirmation of species identities, PCR amplification of the
small-subunit rRNA gene followed by RFLP analysis with various enzymes
is recommended.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Pulmonary colonization with
Burkholderia cepacia is associated with a poor clinical
prognosis for patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) (23). A
relatively constant fraction of CF patients in Western European
countries appear to be colonized with this usually multiple-antibiotic-resistant organism. However, the prevalence in
individual CF centers may differ widely due to epidemic bursts of
infection and problems with the identification of the microorganism. Interestingly, in some CF patients, long-term colonization can occur
without an adverse effect on lung function (8). On the other
hand, some individuals deteriorate rapidly after colonization, and
death may occur within 1 to 6 months (8). There is also evidence that particular clonal isolates of B. cepacia can
be easily transmitted from person to person (12, 25, 31,
32). Separating B. cepacia-colonized or -infected
patients from other CF patients has been used to prevent bacterial
spread, but this practice has a severe social and psychological impact
on the patients and their family members (10). In The
Netherlands, colonization with B. cepacia is considered a
contraindication for lung transplantation. However, this point of view
is not internationally acknowledged (19). Because of the
serious implications of the identification of B. cepacia in
patients with CF, microbiological diagnosis should be carried out as
accurately as possible. However, the isolation and reliable
identification of B. cepacia have been complicated and
difficult (6, 9, 15, 21). Although the pathogenicity of the
closely related species B. gladioli has not been definitely assessed, reliable pathogenicity studies can only be performed once
precise species identification can be achieved in the routine microbiology laboratory.
B. cepacia has recently been described as a complex of
multiple genetic types, or genomovars: B. cepacia (genomovar
I), B. multivorans (genomovar II), genomovars III and IV
(36), and the closely related new species B. vietnamiensis (formerly genomovar IV) (4, 9, 33).
Strains of all of these genomovars, B. vietnamiensis, and
B. gladioli have been isolated from CF patients. Several of
the Burkholderia spp. are of commercial importance because
they can be used as biopesticides, as plant growth promoters, or for
the degradation of environmental pollutants (4, 18, 22, 33).
In The Netherlands, the identification of putative B. cepacia isolates is generally performed by conventional
biochemical analyses. Different institutions use different approaches;
even when essentially the same diagnostic scheme has been applied, several discrepancies have become apparent upon close evaluation and
comparison of the diagnostic data obtained. Moreover, the lack of a
well-evaluated and generally accepted diagnostic "gold standard"
technique is considered a significant limitation by all of those
involved in the management of and care for CF patients. In this
communication, we address the lack of gold standard microbiology techniques and describe the results of conventional and molecular identification procedures applied to a large and diverse collection of
Burkholderia strains. Finally, a method for the optimal
identification of B. cepacia and other clinically
relevant Burkholderia spp. is suggested on the basis of the
results of this comparative study.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Collection and initial identification of strains.
Several
strains of B. cepacia, B. gladioli,
Ralstonia pickettii (formerly B. pickettii
[39]), B. multivorans,
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and Pseudomonas
aeruginosa were obtained from expert microbiology centers in
Germany, Canada, France, Sweden, and The Netherlands. The
characteristics of the strains are given in Table 1. Note that some of the reference
strains obtained from the different participants are the same.
B. cepacia ATCC 25416, for instance, was obtained from
three centers. The strain used in our Rotterdam laboratory was obtained
directly from the American Type Culture Collection and, as such,
provided an accurate species control specimen. Table 1 summarizes the
methods of identification used in the strain contributor home
laboratories.
All strains were characterized by a combination of microbiological,
biochemical, and molecular methods at a single, central laboratory
(Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus
University Medical Centre Rotterdam EMCR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands).
All individual assays were performed batchwise by a single researcher
to prevent experimental day-to-day and person-to-person variability.
Presumptive identification with selective culture media.
All
strains were subcultured on B. cepacia selective agar (BCSA)
(15) and oxidation-fermentation base-polymyxin
B-bacitracin-lactose medium (OFPBL; Becton-Dickinson, Heidelberg,
Germany) (38). The plates were incubated for 5 days at 30 or
37°C. Growth on BCSA is considered indicative of B. cepacia. Colonies on OFPBL were suspected of being B. cepacia if they were yellow as a result of lactose oxidation in
the presence of the bromothymol blue indicator. The natural yellow
pigment of bacterial strains other than B. cepacia may lead
to misidentification and a false-positive result, however.
Biochemical testing.
All bacterial isolates were
characterized on the basis of phenotypic characteristics by use of four
commercial assays. Prior to inoculation into these systems, a
subculture was made on a brucella blood agar plate (bioMerieux,
Marcy l'Etoile, France), which was incubated at 37°C for 18 h.
Oxidase production was determined by means of a dipstick oxidase test
(Difco, Detroit, Mich.).
API 20NE.
For all strains, a cell suspension having a 0.5 McFarland optical density (MF) standard was made with 0.85% NaCl.
Appropriate amounts of this material were added to the wells of an API
20NE strip (bioMerieux), some of which were covered with mineral oil. The strips were incubated for 48 h at 30°C, and the results were recorded by visual inspection and scored with an APILAB PLUS software package as proposed by the manufacturer.
Vitek analysis.
For identification, two different Vitek
cards (from bioMerieux at location given above and at
s'-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands) were used. One card is routinely
used for the identification of gram-negative bacteria (GNI), and the
other card has been developed for the industrial identification of
nonfermenters (NFC). The latter is not commercially available yet. For
all strains, a suspension having a 1.0 MF standard was made with 0.45%
NaCl. The cards, filled with the suspensions, were placed in a specific
tray, which was placed in the Vitek combined reader-incubator.
Identification with the NFC was performed by use of the equipment of
the Dutch bioMerieux representative in s'-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.
MicroScan analysis.
For identification by use of MicroScan
technology (Dade International, West Sacramento, Calif.), the so-called
"negative urine combo type 1" was used. This test format also
assays the susceptibility of strains to antibiotics frequently used
against urinary tract infections and/or infections caused by
gram-negative bacteria. A cell suspension having a 0.5 MF standard was
made with 0.45% NaCl. One hundred microliters of this suspension was
pipetted into a tube with water containing pluronic acid to avoid air
bubbling. The MicroScan kit was filled with the cell suspension and
placed in a WalkAway reader-incubator for overnight processing.
PCR analyses.
PCR-mediated identification was performed by
means of three methods directed to various parts of the ribosomal gene
operon (26, 29, 35, 37). Prior to DNA isolation, strains were grown
overnight at 37°C on brucella blood agar plates. One to three
colonies were suspended in 25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0)-10 mM EDTA-50 mM
glucose and treated with proteinase K and 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate
(SDS). DNA was purified by affinity chromatography with guanidine
hydrothiocyanate and Celite (Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Beerse, Belgium)
(5). The DNA concentration was estimated by electrophoresis
with 1% agarose gels (Hispanagar; Sphaero Q, Leiden, The Netherlands) in the presence of known quantities of lambda DNA as references. The
PCR mixtures used for all amplifications contained 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH
9.0), 50 mM KCl, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 0.01% gelatin, 0.1% Triton X-100, 0.2 mM respective deoxyribonucleotide triphosphate, 2 U of
Taq polymerase (Sphaero Q), and 50 pmol of each primer.
Amplification of DNA was performed with a model 60 thermocycler
(Biomed, Theres, Germany). Amplicons were analyzed by electrophoresis
with 1% agarose gels in the presence of a 100-bp DNA ladder for size
assessment (Gibco/BRL Life Technologies, Breda, The Netherlands).
Two diagnostic PCR assays were performed; the first was done with
primers PC1 and PC2 (35). This assay amplifies the ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) spanning the distance between the 16S
and the 23S ribosomal genes. Approximately 300 ng of DNA was added to a
PCR mixture. Amplification involved an initial denaturation of 2 min at
94°C, followed by 30 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 30 s at
68°C, and 1 min at 72°C. A final extension of 30 min at 72°C was
performed. The target sequence comprised 323 bp. In the second
diagnostic PCR assay, primers PC480 and PC1250 were used
(26). This amplification reaction, targeting the 16S
ribosomal gene, should result in the specific detection of
B. cepacia. Approximately 150 ng of DNA was added to a
standard PCR mixture. Amplification was performed according to the
following scheme: initial denaturation of 5 min at 96°C, followed by
25 cycles of 15 s at 96°C, 30 s at 52°C, and 1.5 min at
70°C. A final extension of 5 min at 70°C was included. The target
sequence was 770 bp long.
PCR-RFLP.
Amplification of the 16S rRNA gene, followed by
restriction enzyme-mediated fragmentation of the amplicon (restriction
fragment length polymorphism [RFLP] analysis), should result in
Burkholderia sp.-specific banding patterns (29,
37). Approximately 50 ng of DNA was added to a PCR mixture as
described above. PCR was performed with primers rD1 and fD1 and a
35-cycle program of 2 min at 95°C, 30 s at 42°C, and 4 min at
72°C, with a final extension of 20 min at 72°C. The amplicons,
approximately 1,500 bp long, were analyzed and quantified on a 1%
agarose gel (Hispanagar). After amplification, the samples were treated
with four different restriction enzymes (AluI,
CfoI, MspI, and DdeI; Boehringer GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). These restriction enzymes were selected on the
basis of homology searches performed for Burkholderia
sp.-specific 16S rRNA sequences available through GenBank (see Fig. 2).
One microliter of enzyme mixture containing 1 U of restriction enzyme and the appropriate buffer components was added to 9 µl of the amplified product. The mixture was incubated for 2 h at 37°C. The sizes of the restriction fragments were documented by
electrophoresis, ethidium bromide staining, UV transillumination, and photography.
 |
RESULTS |
Culture-based assays.
All of the B. cepacia and
B. gladioli strains were positive in the oxidase assay. The
results of growth analyses with selective agar plates are shown in
Table 2. Forty-eight of 50 strains of B. cepacia grew on both BCSA and OFPBL plates. The two
isolates not growing on BCSA plates were gentamicin-sensitive B. cepacia, a result which implies that gentamicin susceptibility may
not be a 100% reliable species discriminator. These isolates were derived from a single German CF patient, showed identical random amplified polymorphic DNA patterns, were negative for the B. cepacia epidemicity marker, and belonged to the B. cepacia genomovar III group (16).
Biochemical identification.
It must be mentioned explicitly
that the taxons B. gladioli and B. multivorans
are not included in the databases of any of the assays used here. The
results of biochemical assays are shown in Table
3. Overall, the API 20NE and the Vitek
GNI were the most accurate. The API 20NE gave a doubtful but
essentially correct identification ("low level of discrimination")
for 6% of the strains; for only 2% of the strains could the system
not provide a bacterial identification at all. The Vitek GNI could not
identify 10% of the tested strains. None of the systems was able to
identify B. gladioli correctly and efficiently. The API
20NE identified 36% of these strains as B. cepacia. The
Vitek GNI identified 21% of B. gladioli strains as B. cepacia, whereas the Vitek NFC and the MicroScan scored 50% and
none, respectively, of 14 strains of B. gladioli as B. cepacia. The MicroScan identified 43% of the strains as
nonfermenters, and for 57% of the strains an incorrect identification
was given. The two strains from Canada which were presented as B. multivorans were identified as B. cepacia by all four
systems. All systems could reliably identify two strains of R. pickettii, the P. aeruginosa strains, and two strains
of S. maltophilia. The Vitek NFC approach did not correctly
identify one of the S. maltophilia strains tested.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 3.
Comparison of four systems of biochemical identification
for Burkholderia spp. and various other
bacterial speciesa
|
|
PCR assays.
The results shown in Table
4 and Figure
1 summarize the experimental data
obtained with the PCR-RFLP procedure. The diagnostic PCRs with primers
PC480-PC1250 and PC1-PC2 could not accurately differentiate B. cepacia from B. gladioli (Table 4). The PCR with the
PC1-PC2 primer combination, whose major drawback is that it lacks
sensitivity for B. cepacia, provided a positive result for
only 22 of 50 B. cepacia strains (sensitivity, 44%). The
specificity of this PCR was good, since no positive results were
encountered among the different B. gladioli strains.
Although the PC480-PC1250 PCR correctly recognized all strains from
both species (100% sensitivity), it did not distinguish between
B. cepacia and B. gladioli. Moreover, other
species may produce positive signals as well (e.g.,
Alcaligenes spp. [unpublished observation]), rendering
this diagnostic application useless.

View larger version (101K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
PCR-RFLP analysis of Burkholderia spp. and
other gram-negative bacilli. The four panels display the results
obtained by restriction of small-subunit rRNA amplicons with the
restriction endonucleases indicated below the panels. The lanes show
the RFLP types found in each enzyme assay. DNA templates were derived
from the following strains (from left to right) (RFLP type):
B. cepacia Dutch patient isolate (AAAA), B. cepacia ATCC 25416 (AAAB), B. cepacia H134-6
(ABBB), B. gladioli ATCC 10248 (BBBC), B. gladioli RIVM 95-665 (BBEC), R. pickettii CCUG3314
(DDDE), P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 (EEFH), and S. maltophilia RIVM 96-330 (CCCD). Lane MW, molecular weight (MW)
standard.
|
|
RFLP typing of ribosomal amplicons turned out to be the most
appropriate technique for discriminating B. cepacia from
B. gladioli. All B. gladioli strains were found
identical when AluI and DdeI digests were
considered (type BC). For B. cepacia, the AluI
pattern was characteristic (type A). These assays were diagnostically accurate and corroborated the initial laboratory identification. On the
other hand, the RFLP analyses demonstrated intraspecies heterogeneity
(types AAAA, AAAB, and ABBB for B. cepacia, for instance).
Interestingly, several of these single RFLP patterns were shared by the
two species (A and B patterns for MspI, for instance). The
RFLP patterns obtained for the other species clearly differed from the
B. cepacia and B. gladioli patterns (e.g., types DDDE, EEFH, and CCCD). Clearly, strains identified as B. cepacia were genetically heterogeneous, as were P. aeruginosa strains (types EEFH, FEFH, and GFFH). It is interesting
to note that 19 of the B. cepacia strains generated a type
AAAA PCR-RFLP pattern, which is identical to that recorded for the
B. multivorans strains. This finding is in agreement
with the recent proposals of Vandamme et al. (36), who
separated B. multivorans from the bulk group of B. cepacia as a separate type. Type AAAA is also encountered among
clinical isolates, substantiating the fact that isolates belonging to
this specific genomovar have colonizing and/or pathogenic potential.
Analysis of clinical Burkholderia sp. isolates.
Twenty of 27 (74%) of the clinical isolates that were suspected of
being B. cepacia appeared to be genuine B. cepacia when PCR-RFLP was considered the gold standard for
identification. This finding implies that the different Dutch strain
contributors possibly misidentified at least seven strains, five of
which were identified as P. aeruginosa by RFLP. This figure
is even higher when the other forms of identification are considered.
Based on Vitek NFC analysis, for instance, 12 of 20 B. cepacia strains (60%) would not have been identified correctly.
It must be emphasized here that the Vitek NFC has not yet been
qualified for laboratory-based medical microbiological diagnostic
procedures. The API 20NE misidentified only a single strain,
underscoring its excellent diagnostic potential. Not all strain
contributors misidentified the strains; since most of the strains were
isolated from CF patients and showed aberrant characteristics, the
microbiologists involved wanted to exclude the possibility of B. cepacia carriage.
 |
DISCUSSION |
The genetic defect causing CF predisposes patients to an aberrant
pulmonary susceptibility to infectious disease. Several of the
bacterial species encountering a suitable ecological niche in the lungs
of CF patients are especially pathogenic for the host. B. cepacia, a microorganism originally identified as the causative
agent of soft rot of onions, is a well-known representative of this
particular group; in 20% of patients who become colonized with this
species, the rapidly fatal B. cepacia syndrome may occur (11). Microbiological detection of B. cepacia
appears to be complicated, and laboratory proficiency testing was
particularly disappointing in the past (34). Difficulties
and inaccuracies at the level of laboratory procedures have been
documented even when simple plating procedures are used for screening
(15). Mix-ups with relatively nonpathogenic bacterial
species have been described (21), and even commercially
available diagnostic tests have failed (6). Also, the
taxonomy of Burkholderia spp. is still evolving, and the
pathogenic potential of the diverse species and subspecies for humans
has not been elucidated yet (10). Major biological and
genetic diversity among isolates of B. cepacia subspecies
cultured from the same environmental source can be demonstrated
(7). Variation in the flagellin genes of B. cepacia can be demonstrated for subdivisions within the species as
well (14). In addition, it has been demonstrated that
clinical isolates of B. cepacia may have characteristics of
B. gladioli (3), a species for which some records
of severe infections exist as well (1, 13, 17, 20, 28, 30).
The issues mentioned here warrant in-depth studies on the value of the
currently available diagnostic tools for the identification of B. cepacia.
In the present communication, we tried to define the best procedures
for diagnosing the presence of Burkholderia spp. in the sputum of CF patients. A collection of Burkholderia strains
was obtained from several reference laboratories. Based on our results, we suggest the use of either BCSA or OFPBL plates for the initial isolation of B. cepacia directly from clinical material. The
sensitivity of these growth media appeared to be excellent (96 and
100%, respectively); the specificity, however, was not 100%. Because
of the growth of species other than B. cepacia on
selective agar, such agar cannot be used for the definitive
identification of a strain as B. cepacia but can provide a
useful first screen, as stated previously (15). In the
presence of colonization or infection by B. gladioli, many
strains will not be detected if this procedure is used as the single
diagnostic assay.
It was quite striking to find that the automated assays, such as Vitek
and MicroScan, performed with varying but consistently insufficient
accuracy. Only the Vitek GNI reliably identified most of the B. cepacia strains, but it encountered major problems with B. gladioli strains. Improvement in both cards and software is
certainly needed for all automated systems currently available. The
major outcome of the present analysis is the fact that molecular identification by PCR-RFLP analysis is superior to the biochemical and
microbiological species identification procedures used here, although
it should be emphasized that the API 20NE performed satisfactorily, as
documented previously (15, 27). No international gold
standard for the routine laboratory identification of clinically
relevant Burkholderia species exists to date, so the
definition of accurate sensitivities and specificities for the tests
used in the present communication remains a topic for future
investigations. The PCR-RFLP procedure was found to be in excellent
agreement with strain identification provided by the different study participants.
Genetic mosaicism has been proposed on the basis of phenotypic studies
for B. cepacia and B. gladioli (3). On
the basis of the currently known small-subunit rRNA gene sequences
(Fig. 2) and the PCR-RFLP test,
intraspecific polymorphism can be anticipated and noted, respectively.
Depending on the restriction enzyme, species-specific RFLP patterns or
RFLP patterns that are shared between the two species can be observed.
Whether this observation relates to genetic exchange or mere
coincidence, based on lack of variability in the ribosomal region that
is targeted by the enzyme, requires additional DNA sequencing studies.
In the present study, no clearly overlapping characteristics were noted
among the diverse types of the strains and the tests that were
performed. Only for a B. cepacia strain with type ABBB
was the PCR with primer pair PC1-PC2 positive, although exceptions may
be encountered in the future. It would be interesting to determine
whether the RFLPs coincide with the epidemicity and pathogenicity of
the strain (24, 25).

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Prediction of different restriction sites in the
ribosomal genes for Burkholderia spp. Numbering identifies
nucleotides in the consensus small-subunit rRNA gene sequences
available through GenBank. Restriction sites are highlighted by boxes,
and the nature of the restriction enzyme is indicated by the
appropriate abbreviation.
|
|
For adequate characterization of the strains of Burkholderia
spp. described in this report, we suggest that the PCR-RFLP procedure be used as the most definitive means of identification. However, it
must be emphasized that PCR-based methods are not generally available
to the clinical microbiologist. We recommend that microbiologists initiate characterization with a diagnostic agar followed by API 20NE.
Routine microbiology procedures should be used prior to the tests
mentioned above in order to exclude all nonrelevant bacterial species.
The PCR-RFLP procedure seems to be a reliable tool for discriminating
strains of B. cepacia versus B. gladioli. This
technique should facilitate more detailed studies on the clinical
relevance of the latter species in CF and other diseases. Whereas
previously a comparison of the endotoxicity of lipopolysaccharide
isolated from both species was a measure of clinical relevance
(10), now precise species identification can replace
superficial lipopolysaccharide characteristics for a more
species-defining feature. In order to make another important step
forward, the DNA assays used here and those newly described in the
literature (2) should be adapted for PCR directly from
sputum samples.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank David Speert and Deborah Henry (Research Centre,
Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada) for providing several reference strains and for their support
during the preparation of the manuscript. We gratefully acknowledge the
involvement of the medical microbiologists Peter de Man (Department of
Medical Microbiology, Sint Franciscus Gasthuis, Rotterdam, The
Netherlands) and Johan Mouton (Department of Medical Microbiology,
Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands) in providing
several of the strains. We thank Anja Senneker (bioMerieux, s'-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands) for help with the use of the Vitek
NFC and for putting these cards at our disposal free of charge. We
thank Sabine Deelen for incidental help with strain cultivation.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus University
Medical Center Rotterdam EMCR, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD
Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Phone: 31-10-4633668. Fax: 31-10-4633875. E-mail: vanpelt{at}bacl.azr.nl.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Barker, P. M.,
R. E. Wood, and P. H. Gilligan.
1997.
Lung infection with Burkholderia gladioli in a child with cystic fibrosis: acute clinical and spirometric deterioration.
Pediatr. Pulmonol.
23:123-125[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Bauernfeind, A.,
I. Schneider,
R. Jungwirth, and C. Roller.
1998.
Discrimination of Burkholderia species detectable in cystic fibrosis patients by PCR.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
36:2748-2751[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Baxter, I. A.,
P. A. Lambert, and I. N. Simpson.
1997.
Isolation from clinical sources of Burkholderia cepacia possessing characteristics of Burkholderia gladioli.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
39:169-175[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Bevinino, A.,
S. Tabacchioni,
L. Chiarini,
M. V. Carusi,
M. del Gallo, and P. Visca.
1994.
Phenotypic comparison between rhizosphere and clinical isolates of Burkholderia cepacia.
Microbiology
140:1069-1077[Abstract].
|
| 5.
|
Boom, R.,
C. J. A. Sol,
M. M. M. Salimans,
C. L. Jansen,
P. M. E. Wertheim-van Dillen, and J. van der Noordaa.
1990.
Rapid and simple method for purification of nucleic acids.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
28:495-503[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Burdge, D. R.,
M. A. Noble,
M. E. Campbell,
V. L. Krell, and D. P. Speert.
1995.
Xanthomonas maltophilia misidentified as Pseudomonas cepacia in cultures of sputum from patients with cystic fibrosis: a diagnostic pitfall with major clinical implications.
Clin. Infect. Dis.
20:445-448[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Di Cello, F.,
A. Bevivino,
L. Chiarini,
R. Fani,
D. Paffetti,
S. Tabacchioni, and C. Dalmastri.
1997.
Biodiversity of a Burkholderia cepacia population isolated from the maize rhizosphere at different plant growth stages.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
63:4485-4493[Abstract].
|
| 8.
|
Gilligan, P. H.
1991.
Microbiology of airway disease in patients with cystic fibrosis.
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
4:35-51[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Gillis, M.,
T. van Van,
R. Bardin,
M. Goor,
P. Hebbar,
A. Willems,
P. Segers,
K. Kersters,
T. Heulin, and M. P. Fernandez.
1995.
Polyphasic taxonomy in the genus Burkholderia leading to an amended description of the genus and proposition of Burkholderia vietnamiensis sp. nov. for N2-fixing isolates from rice in Vietnam.
Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.
45:274-289.
|
| 10.
|
Govan, J. R. W., and V. Deretic.
1996.
Microbial pathogenesis in cystic fibrosis: mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Burkholderia cepacia.
Microbiol. Rev.
60:539-574[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Govan, J. R. W.,
J. E. Hughes, and P. Vandamme.
1996.
Burkholderia cepacia: medical, taxonomic and ecological issues.
J. Med. Microbiol.
45:395-407[Abstract].
|
| 12.
|
Govan, J. R. W.,
P. H. Brown,
J. Maddison,
C. J. Doherty,
J. W. Nelson,
M. Dodd,
A. P. Greening, and A. K. Webb.
1993.
Evidence for transmission of Pseudomonas cepacia by social contact in cystic fibrosis.
Lancet
342:15-19[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Graves, M.,
T. Robin,
A. M. Chipman,
J. Wong,
S. Khashe, and J. M. Janda.
1997.
Four additional cases of Burkholderia gladioli infection with microbiological correlates and review.
Clin. Infect. Dis.
25:838-842[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Hales, B. A.,
J. A. W. Morgan,
C. A. Hart, and C. Winstanley.
1998.
Variation in flagellin genes and proteins of Burkholderia cepacia.
J. Bacteriol.
180:1110-1118[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Henry, D. A.,
M. E. Campbell,
J. J. LiPuma, and D. P. Speert.
1997.
Identification of Burkholderia cepacia isolates from patients with cystic fibrosis and use of a simple new selective medium.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
35:614-619[Abstract].
|
| 16.
| Henry, D. A. Personal communication.
|
| 17.
|
Hoare, S., and A. J. Cant.
1996.
Chronic granulomatous disease presenting as severe sepsis due to Burkholderia gladioli.
Clin. Infect. Dis.
23:411[Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Holmes, A.,
J. Govan, and R. Goldstein.
1998.
Agriculture use of Burkholderia (Pseudomonas) cepacia: a threat to human health?
Emerg. Infect. Dis.
4:221-227[Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Kanji, S. S.,
V. Tapson,
R. D. Davis,
J. Madden, and I. Browning.
1997.
Infections in patients with cystic fibrosis following lung transplantation.
Chest
112:924-930[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Khan, S. U.,
S. M. Gordon,
P. C. Stillwell,
T. J. Kirby, and A. C. Arroliga.
1996.
Empyema and bloodstream infection caused by Burkholderia gladioli in a patient with cystic fibrosis after lung transplantation.
Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J.
15:637-639[Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Kiska, D. L.,
A. Kerr,
M. C. Jones,
J. A. Carracciolo,
B. Eskridge,
M. Jordan,
S. Miller,
D. Hughes,
N. King, and P. H. Gilligan.
1996.
Accuracy of four commercial systems for identification of Burkholderia cepacia and other gram-negative nonfermenting bacilli recovered from patients with cystic fibrosis.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
34:886-891[Abstract].
|
| 22.
|
Landa, A. S.,
F. M. Sipkema,
J. Weijma,
A. A. Beenackers,
J. Dolfing, and D. B. Janssen.
1994.
Cometabolic degradation of trichloroethylene by Pseudomonas cepacia G4 in a chemostat with toluene as the primary substrate.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
60:3368-3374[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
LiPuma, J. J.
1998.
Burkholderia cepacia: management issues and new insights.
Clin. Chest Med.
19:473-486[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Mahenthiralingam, E.,
D. A. Simpson, and D. P. Speert.
1997.
Identification and characterization of a novel DNA marker associated with epidemic Burkholderia cepacia strains recovered from patients with cystic fibrosis.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
35:808-816[Abstract].
|
| 25.
|
Mahenthiralingam, E.,
M. E. Campbell,
D. A. Henry, and D. P. Speert.
1996.
Epidemiology of Burkholderia cepacia infection in patients with cystic fibrosis: analysis by randomly amplified polymorphic DNA fingerprinting.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
34:2914-2920[Abstract].
|
| 26.
|
O'Callaghan, E. M.,
M. S. Tanner, and G. J. Boulnois.
1994.
Development of a PCR probe test for identifying Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Pseudomonas (Burkholderia) cepacia.
J. Clin. Pathol.
47:222-226[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Pitt, T. L., and J. R. W. Govan.
1993.
Pseudomonas cepacia and cystic fibrosis.
PHLS Microbiol. Dig.
10:69-72.
|
| 28.
|
Ross, J.,
S. M. Holland,
V. J. Gill,
E. S. DeCarlo, and J. I. Gallin.
1995.
Severe Burkholderia (Pseudomonas) gladioli infection in chronic granulomatous disease: report of two successfully treated cases.
Clin. Infect. Dis.
21:1291-1293[Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Segonds, C.,
T. Heulin,
N. Marty, and G. Chabanon.
1999.
Differentiation of Burkholderia species by PCR-restriction fragment analysis of the 16S rRNA gene and application to cystic fibrosis isolates.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
37:2201-2208[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Shin, J. H.,
S. H. Kim,
M. G. Shin,
S. P. Suh,
D. W. Ryang, and M. H. Jeong.
1997.
Bacteremia due to Burkholderia gladioli: case report.
Clin. Infect. Dis.
25:1264-1265[Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Smith, D. L.,
L. B. Gumery,
E. G. Smith,
D. E. Stableforth,
M. E. Kaufmann, and T. L. Pitt.
1993.
Epidemic of Pseudomonas cepacia in an adult cystic fibrosis unit: evidence of person-to-person transmission.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
31:3017-3022[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Sun, L.,
R. Jiang,
S. Steinbach,
A. Holmes,
C. Campanelli,
J. Forstner,
U. Sajjan,
Y. Tan,
M. Riley, and R. Goldstein.
1995.
The emergence of a highly transmissible lineage of abl+ Pseudomonas (Burkholderia) cepacia causing CF centre epidemics in North America and Britain.
Nat. Med.
1:661-665[Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Tabacchioni, S.,
P. Visca,
L. Chiarini,
A. Bevinino,
C. di Serio,
S. Fancelli, and R. Fani.
1995.
Molecular characterisation of rhizosphere and clinical isolates of Burkholderia cepacia.
Res. Microbiol.
146:531-542[Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Tablan, O. C.,
L. A. Carson,
L. B. Cusick,
L. A. Bland,
W. J. Martone, and W. R. Jarvis.
1987.
Laboratory proficiency test results on use of selective media for isolating Pseudomonas cepacia from simulated sputum specimens of patients with cystic fibrosis.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
25:485-487[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 35.
|
Tyler, S. D.,
C. A. Strathdee,
K. R. Rozee, and W. M. Johnson.
1995.
Primers designed to differentiate pathogenic pseudomonads on the basis of the sequencing of genes coding for 16S-23S rRNA internal transcribed spacers.
Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol.
4:448-453.
|
| 36.
|
Vandamme, P.,
G. Holmes,
M. Vancanneyt,
T. Coenye,
B. Hoste,
R. Coopman,
H. Revets,
S. Lauers,
M. Gillis,
K. Kersters, and J. R. V. Govan.
1997.
Occurrence of multiple genomovars of Burkholderia cepacia in cystic fibrosis patients and proposal of Burkholderia multivorans sp. nov.
Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.
47:1188-1200[Medline].
|
| 37.
|
Weisburg, W. G.,
S. M. Barns,
D. A. Pelletier, and D. J. Lane.
1991.
16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study.
J. Bacteriol.
173:697-703[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 38.
|
Welch, D. F.,
M. J. Muszynski,
C. H. Pai,
M. J. Marcon,
M. M. Hribar,
P. H. Gilligan,
J. M. Matsen,
P. A. Ahlin,
B. C. Hilman, and S. A. Chartrand.
1987.
Selective and differential medium for recovery of Pseudomonas cepacia from the respiratory tracts of patients with cystic fibrosis.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
25:1730-1734[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 39.
|
Yabuuchi, E.,
Y. Kosako,
I. Yano,
H. Hotta, and Y. Nishiuchi.
1995.
Transfer of two Burkholderia and an Alcaligenes species to Ralstonia gen. nov.: proposal of Ralstonia pickettii (Ralston, Palleromi and Doudoroff 1973) comb. nov., Ralstonia solanacearum (Smith 1896) comb. nov. and Ralstonia eutropha (Davis 1969) comb. nov.
Microbiol. Immunol.
39:897-904[Medline].
|
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, July 1999, p. 2158-2164, Vol. 37, No. 7
0095-1137/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.