This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Leeuwen, W. B.
Right arrow Articles by Goessens, W. H. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Leeuwen, W. B.
Right arrow Articles by Goessens, W. H. F.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, September 1999, p. 3029-3030, Vol. 37, No. 9
0095-1137/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Rapid Detection of Methicillin Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus Isolates by the MRSA-Screen Latex Agglutination Test

Willem B. van Leeuwen,* Cindy van Pelt, Ad Luijendijk, Henri A. Verbrugh, and Wil H. F. Goessens

Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Received 19 January 1999/Returned for modification 27 February 1999/Accepted 9 June 1999


    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

The slide agglutination test MRSA-Screen (Denka Seiken Co., Niigata, Japan) was compared with the mecA PCR ("gold standard") for the detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. The MRSA-Screen test detected the penicillin-binding protein 2a (PBP2a) antigen in 87 of 90 genetically diverse methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) stock culture strains, leading to a sensitivity of 97%. The three discrepant MRSA strains displayed positive results only after induction of the mecA gene by exposure to methicillin. Both mecA PCR and MRSA-Screen displayed negative results among the methicillin-susceptible S. aureus strains (n = 106), as well as for Micrococcus spp. (n = 10), members of the family Enterobacteriaceae (n = 10), Streptococcus pneumoniae (n = 10), and Enterococcus spp. (n = 10) (specificity = 100%). Producing the same PBP2a antigen, all 10 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis strains score positived in both the latex test and the mecA PCR. Consequently, the MRSA-Screen test should be applied only after identification of the MRSA strain to the species level to rule out coagulase-negative staphylococci. In conclusion, due to excellent specificity and sensitivity the MRSA-Screen latex test has the potential to be successfully used for routine applications in the microbiology laboratory.


    TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

In most routine microbiological settings, the detection of methicillin resistance among Staphylococcus aureus isolates is based on phenotypic assays. Genetic confirmation of positive findings based on the detection of the mecA gene (4) is performed in reference laboratories only, as these techniques are not yet generally available. Methicillin resistance in staphylococci is mediated by the mecA gene, encoding the penicillin-binding protein 2a (PBP2a), which has a reduced affinity for beta-lactam antibiotics. Denka Seiken has developed a simple latex agglutination assay for the detection of methicillin resistance, which makes use of a specific monoclonal antibody directed toward the PBP2a antigen (5). In order to get insight into the sensitivity of the assay, 90 genetically unrelated methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains were included as well as 106 epidemiologically unrelated methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) strains to control the specificity of the assay. In order to test the extent of cross-reactivity of the MRSA-Screen assay, other species were also included: 10 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE) strains and 10 isolates each of species of the family Enterobacteriaceae, Micrococcus spp., Enterococcus spp., and Streptococcus pneumoniae (Table 1).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1.   Characterization of the strain collections used in this study

S. aureus strains were identified by the AccuProbe S. aureus culture identification test (Gen-Probe, Inc., San Diego, Calif.), performed in accordance with the manufacturer's protocol. Methicillin resistance of all S. aureus (MRSA and MSSA) and S. epidermidis (MRSE) strains was analyzed by means of the disk diffusion test in accordance with National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards guidelines (6), and the mecA gene was detected by PCR as the "gold standard" (4). Coagulase-negative staphylococci were identified as S. epidermidis by Staphaurex (Murex Biotech Ltd., Dartford, United Kingdom) and API-Staph (bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France). The complete panel of strains (Table 1) was tested with MRSA-Screen, and the test was performed in accordance with the manufacturer's protocol. In short, a loopful of bacterial cells was suspended in 200 µl of extraction reagent 1 and subsequently lysed by boiling for 3 min. After cooling to room temperature, 50 µl of extraction reagent 2 was added to 200 µl of the lysate and samples were mixed well. After 5 min of centrifugation (1,500 × g), 50 µl of the supernatant was used for testing agglutination with sensitized latex particles (1 drop) and another 50 µl of the supernatant was used for testing with the control latex particles (1 drop). The test slides were mixed by rotating them for 3 min, after which agglutination was assessed visually. S. aureus ATCC 29213 was used as a negative control in both the mecA PCR and the MRSA-Screen test. A mecA-positive clinical isolate was used as a positive control strain.

The results are summarized in Table 2. For all 90 genetically diverse MRSA strains consisting of six different mecA types (2), the presence of the mecA gene was reconfirmed with PCR. As MRSA-Screen detects the PBP2a antigen in 87 of 90 MRSA strains, the sensitivity is 97%. Repeated testing after multiple subculturing did not reconcile the results for the three initial agglutination-negative, mecA-positive S. aureus isolates. These discrepancies are probably due to the suppression of mecA gene transcription (3). In order to bypass this problem, the three isolates were again incubated overnight in the presence of a disk containing 5 µg of methicillin. The MRSA-Screen assay was repeated with colonies taken within the zone of inhibition or at the border of the inhibition zone. All three isolates became positive, whereas the control, i.e., colonies taken from the same culture plate but not in the vicinity of the methicillin disk, remained negative. These findings actually indicate that the sensitivity of the assay can be improved by performing the agglutination assay with isolates previously exposed to methicillin. None of the 106 genetically diverse MSSA strains demonstrated positive results with MRSA-Screen or the mecA PCR, directing the specificity to 100%. The Enterobacteriaceae strains, S. pneumoniae, Enterococcus spp., and Micrococcus spp. were identified with Microscan (Dade Behring, Leusden, The Netherlands), optochin disk diffusion (Oxoid, Basingstoke, United Kingdom), Vitek (bioMérieux), and API-Staph (bioMérieux), respectively. Among these genera, no false-positive results could be detected, ruling out the presence of cross-reacting antigens. Since the genetic mechanism of methicillin resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci is identical to that in S. aureus (1), all MRSE strains (n = 10) displayed positive results in both mecA PCR and the MRSA-Screen test.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 2.   Results obtained with diagnostic tests on diverse strain collectionsa

In our opinion, the assay should be applied in a routine setting by using the following consecutive steps. After isolation of a suspect MRSA strain, it first needs to be identified to the species level to exclude coagulase-negative staphylococci. Second, the potential MRSA strain is subjected to the MRSA-Screen test. In the event of a positive result, the identification is definitely MRSA. If a negative result is found, the assay has to be repeated after the strain has been exposed to methicillin in order to induce possible methicillin resistance. If the MRSA strain is then positive, MRSA has been identified. In the event of a negative result, the mecA PCR should be used as the final and conclusive confirmation assay.

In conclusion, the MRSA-Screen latex test has the potential for the detection of MRSA in a routine microbiology setting as it combines high speed and excellent specificity and sensitivity with limited requirements for special equipment or skilled personnel.


    FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Phone: 31 10 4633668. Fax: 31 10 4633875. E-mail: vanleeuwen{at}bacl.azr.nl.


    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Text
References

1. Hiramatsu, K. 1995. Molecular evolution of MRSA. Microbiol. Immunol. 39:531-543[Medline].
2. Kreiswirth, B., J. Kornblum, R. D. Arbeit, W. Eisner, J. N. Maslow, A. McGeer, D. E. Low, and R. P. Novick. 1993. Evidence for a clonal origin of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Science 259:227-230[Abstract/Free Full Text].
3. Kuwahara-Arai, K., N. Kondo, S. Hori, E. Tateda-Suzuki, and K. Hiramatsu. 1996. Suppression of methicillin resistance in a mecA-containing pre-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain is caused by the mecI-mediated repression of PBP 2' production. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:2680-2685[Abstract].
4. Murakami, K., W. Minamide, K. Wada, E. Nakamura, H. Teraoka, and S. Watanabe. 1991. Identification of methicillin-resistant strains of staphylococci by polymerase chain reaction. J. Clin. Microbiol. 29:2240-2244[Abstract/Free Full Text].
5. Nakatomi, Y., and J. Sugiyama. 1998. A rapid latex agglutination assay for the detection of penicillin-binding protein 2'. Microbiol. Immunol. 42:739-743[Medline].
6. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 1998. Performance National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; eighth informational supplement, vol. 18. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
7. Tenover, F. C., R. Arbeit, G. Archer, J. Biddle, S. Byrne, R. Goering, G. Hancock, G. A. Hebert, B. Hill, R. Hollis, et al. 1994. Comparison of traditional and molecular methods of typing isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 32:407-415[Abstract/Free Full Text].
8. van Leeuwen, W., A. van Belkum, B. Kreiswirth, and H. Verbrugh. 1998. Genetic diversification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus as a function of prolonged geographic dissemination and as measured by binary typing and other genotyping methods. Res. Microbiol. 149:497-507[Medline].

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, September 1999, p. 3029-3030, Vol. 37, No. 9
0095-1137/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.


This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Mencacci, A., Montecarlo, I., Gonfia, F., Moretti, A., Cardaccia, A., Farinelli, S., Pagliochini, M. R., Giuliani, A., Basileo, M., Pasticci, M. B., Bistoni, F. (2009). Comparison of the BD Phoenix System with the Cefoxitin Disk Diffusion Test for Detection of Methicillin Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47: 2288-2291 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Bressler, A. M., Williams, T., Culler, E. E., Zhu, W., Lonsway, D., Patel, J. B., Nolte, F. S. (2005). Correlation of Penicillin Binding Protein 2a Detection with Oxacillin Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and Discovery of a Novel Penicillin Binding Protein 2a Mutation. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 4541-4544 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kaplan, S., Marlowe, E. M., Hogan, J. J., Doymaz, M., Bruckner, D. A., Simor, A. E. (2005). Sensitivity and Specificity of a Rapid rRNA Gene Probe Assay for Simultaneous Identification of Staphylococcus aureus and Detection of mecA. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 3438-3442 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Miller, M. B., Meyer, H., Rogers, E., Gilligan, P. H. (2005). Comparison of Conventional Susceptibility Testing, Penicillin-Binding Protein 2a Latex Agglutination Testing, and mecA Real-Time PCR for Detection of Oxacillin Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and Coagulase-Negative Staphylococcus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 3450-3452 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Velasco, D., del Mar Tomas, M., Cartelle, M., Beceiro, A., Perez, A., Molina, F., Moure, R., Villanueva, R., Bou, G. (2005). Evaluation of different methods for detecting methicillin (oxacillin) resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. J Antimicrob Chemother 55: 379-382 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Warren, D. K., Liao, R. S., Merz, L. R., Eveland, M., Dunne, W. M. Jr. (2004). Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Directly from Nasal Swab Specimens by a Real-Time PCR Assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 5578-5581 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Pottumarthy, S., Schapiro, J. M., Prentice, J. L., Houze, Y. B., Swanzy, S. R., Fang, F. C., Cookson, B. T. (2004). Clinical Isolates of Staphylococcus intermedius Masquerading as Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 5881-5884 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kipp, F., Becker, K., Peters, G., von Eiff, C. (2004). Evaluation of Different Methods To Detect Methicillin Resistance in Small-Colony Variants of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 1277-1279 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Chapin, K. C., Musgnug, M. C. (2004). Evaluation of Penicillin Binding Protein 2a Latex Agglutination Assay for Identification of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Directly from Blood Cultures. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 1283-1284 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Krishnan, P U, Miles, K, Shetty, N (2002). Detection of methicillin and mupirocin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus isolates using conventional and molecular methods: a descriptive study from a burns unit with high prevalence of MRSA. J. Clin. Pathol. 55: 745-748 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Jonas, D., Speck, M., Daschner, F. D., Grundmann, H. (2002). Rapid PCR-Based Identification of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus from Screening Swabs. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 1821-1823 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Donnio, P.-Y., Louvet, L., Preney, L., Nicolas, D., Avril, J.-L., Desbordes, L. (2002). Nine-Year Surveillance of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a Hospital Suggests Instability of mecA DNA Region in an Epidemic Strain. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 1048-1052 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Sakoulas, G., Gold, H. S., Venkataraman, L., DeGirolami, P. C., Eliopoulos, G. M., Qian, Q. (2001). Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Comparison of Susceptibility Testing Methods and Analysis of mecA-Positive Susceptible Strains. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39: 3946-3951 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Louie, L., Majury, A., Goodfellow, J., Louie, M., Simor, A. E. (2001). Evaluation of a Latex Agglutination Test (MRSA-Screen) for Detection of Oxacillin Resistance in Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39: 4149-4151 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Horstkotte, M. A., Knobloch, J. K.-M., Rohde, H., Mack, D. (2001). Rapid Detection of Methicillin Resistance in Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci by a Penicillin-Binding Protein 2a-Specific Latex Agglutination Test. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39: 3700-3702 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Swenson, J. M., Williams, P. P., Killgore, G., O'Hara, C. M., Tenover, F. C. (2001). Performance of Eight Methods, Including Two New Rapid Methods, for Detection of Oxacillin Resistance in a Challenge Set of Staphylococcus aureus Organisms. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39: 3785-3788 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Yamazumi, T., Marshall, S. A., Wilke, W. W., Diekema, D. J., Pfaller, M. A., Jones, R. N. (2001). Comparison of the Vitek Gram-Positive Susceptibility 106 Card and the MRSA-Screen Latex Agglutination Test for Determining Oxacillin Resistance in Clinical Bloodstream Isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39: 53-56 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Hussain, Z., Stoakes, L., Garrow, S., Longo, S., Fitzgerald, V., Lannigan, R. (2000). Rapid Detection of mecA-Positive and mecA-Negative Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci by an Anti-Penicillin Binding Protein 2a Slide Latex Agglutination Test. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38: 2051-2054 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Louie, L., Matsumura, S. O., Choi, E., Louie, M., Simor, A. E. (2000). Evaluation of Three Rapid Methods for Detection of Methicillin Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38: 2170-2173 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Merlino, J., Leroi, M., Bradbury, R., Veal, D., Harbour, C. (2000). New Chromogenic Identification and Detection of Staphylococcus aureus and Methicillin-Resistant S. aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38: 2378-2380 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Marriott, D. J. E., Karagiannis, T., Harkness, J. L., Kearney;, P., Cavassini, M., Wenger, A., Jaton, K., Bille, J., Blanc, D. S. (1999). Further Evaluation of the MRSA-Screen Kit for Rapid Detection of Methicillin Resistance. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37: 3783-3784 [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Leeuwen, W. B.
Right arrow Articles by Goessens, W. H. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Leeuwen, W. B.
Right arrow Articles by Goessens, W. H. F.

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»