Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, September 1999, p. 3041-3043, Vol. 37, No. 9
0095-1137/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Evaluation of the Effects of Storage in Two
Different Swab Fabrics and under Three Different Transport Conditions
on Recovery of Aerobic and Anaerobic Bacteria
E.
Roelofsen,1,*
M.
van Leeuwen,1
G. J.
Meijer-Severs,1
M. H. F.
Wilkinson,2 and
J. E.
Degener1
Laboratory for Medical
Microbiology1 and Centre for High
Performance Computing,2 Rijksuniversiteit
Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
Received 15 March 1999/Returned for modification 21 April
1999/Accepted 8 June 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
Recovery of six anaerobic and five aerobic pathogens from viscose
swabs and polyurethane swabs (Culturette EZ) was evaluated quantitatively, and transport in aerobic dry tubes, aerobic Amies transport medium (Transwab), and anaerobic universal transport medium
(Port-a-Cul) was compared. The Culturette EZ in aerobic dry tubes gave
the highest recovery levels. Data obtained with clinical specimens
confirmed these results.
 |
TEXT |
Recovery of bacteria from clinical
specimens after transport or storage without the alteration of the
relative proportions of the constituent species has long been
recognized as a major problem (1-7).
Our goal was to select a transport medium that maintains the viability
and relative proportions of all bacteria present in the patient
material. We compared two types of swabs in presence or absence of
different transport media. This led to six combinations: viscose swabs
(V) (Copan, Italy) and polyurethane swabs (PU) (Becton Dickinson
Microbiology Systems), in aerobic dry tubes (without transport medium
[0]) (provided by Copan, Bovezzo, Italy, with the viscose swabs),
aerobic Amies medium (A) (Medical Wire & Equipment Co. Ltd., Corsham,
Wilts, United Kingdom), and anaerobic universal transport medium
(Port-a-Cul [PAC]; Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems). These
combinations were inoculated with a standardized concentration of test
strains. After various periods of incubation, the levels of recovery of
the test strains were determined. Six anaerobic strains were used:
Clostridium innocuum, Fusobacterium necrophorum,
Clostridium perfringens, Peptostreptococcus
tetradius, Bacteroides fragilis, and
Peptostreptococcus anaerobius. Five aerobic strains were
tested: Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus,
Streptococcus pneumoniae, Neisseria gonorrhoeae,
and Haemophilus influenzae.
Serial 10-fold dilutions of an overnight culture were prepared,
depending on the strain, in brain heart infusion or thioglycolate broth
with X and V factors. When needed, anaerobic conditions (8)
were maintained by flushing the reduced broth under a continuing stream
of CO2 gas. Fifty microliters of each dilution was
inoculated on solid plates (brucella-blood agar, blood agar, or
chocolate agar plates); then aerobic strains were incubated for 24 h at 37°C and anaerobic strains were incubated for 48 h. The
dilution that yielded 200 to 300 colonies per plate was used to
inoculate the swabs. To imitate reality, 50 µl of the appropriate
dilution (~5 × 103 CFU/ml) was pipetted into wells
of a microplate and immediately absorbed with the swabs, which were
then kept in a tube with or without transport medium. After intervals
varying from 0 to 48 h of storage at room temperature, the swabs
were rolled onto the surface of an agar medium appropriate for
culturing of the various organisms. After incubation (24 h for the
aerobic strains and 48 h for the anaerobic strains), the residual
number of colonies was counted and compared with the original number.
The latter was obtained when 50 µl of the appropriate dilution was
inoculated immediately, without using swabs, onto the agar medium. All
experiments were performed in duplicate.
The percentage of recovery of each strain was calculated by dividing
the residual number of colonies by the original number and multiplying
by 100.
Table 1 gives the median recovery levels
determined for the aerobic and anaerobic strains at different times of
incubation. The combination PU/0 results in the highest median recovery
levels, a finding that is statistically significant by the Friedmann
rank sum test. The combination V/A is the second best. For the other combinations, recovery levels are much lower. Between 24 and 48 h,
recovery levels increased with the combinations V/A, PU/A, V/PAC, and
PU/PAC, probably due to bacterial growth in the swabs. The median
recovery levels for the combinations V/PAC and PU/PAC did not differ
very much, although those for PU/PAC were somewhat lower than those for
V/PAC. The combination V/0 results in the lowest recovery levels. At
24 h, some strains could not be cultured from the swabs (N. gonorrhoeae in V/0, V/PAC, or PU/PAC; F. necrophorum in
V/0, PU/0, V/A, PU/A, or V/PAC; P. anaerobius in V/0, V/PAC, or PU/PAC; and E. coli in V/0) while others showed growth
(S. aureus in V/0, PU/0, V/A, or PU/A; E. coli in
all combinations except V/0; and H. influenzae in PU/0
only).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1.
Median percentages of recovery of anaerobic and aerobic
strains tested on six different combinations of swabs and media
|
|
The finding that the recovery levels for PU/0 were higher than those
for the other combinations was unexpected. Even with anaerobic strains,
the PU/0 combination ranked first. This finding is surprising because
the swab was not stored in a reduced environment. It might be explained
by the nontoxic characteristics and sponge-like structure of the swab;
the latter causes little desiccation, and the bacteria do not adhere
tightly to the surface. The fact that the swab is not inserted into a
medium reduces mechanical losses, since the swab is not squeezed by
insertion into the agar. Despite the higher percentages of recovery in
the first 12 h, the survival of the anaerobic strains stored in
PU/0 after 24 and 48 h was in the same range as that obtained with
V/A. This is probably due to the effect of oxygen on the anaerobic
bacteria. The transport medium PAC, compared in earlier studies with
Accu-CulShure (2) and Anaerobic Specimen Collector
(6) on clinical specimens, gave lower recovery levels than
PU/0 in our studies. The use of a transport medium does not improve the
performance of PU. This effect can be seen by comparing the
combinations PU/0, PU/A (5% agar), and PU/PAC (10% agar).
It is not surprising that the median percentages of recovery with the
dry viscose swab (V/0) were low for all strains tested (8.2 to 0%). It
has been shown (5) that bacteria, which adhere to polar dry
fibers, become desiccated, and only 3 to 5% can be recovered. The
percentages of recovery, of the different bacterial strains at time
zero are given in Table 2. It illustrates
the loss of organisms due to adhesion to the swab material. For the aerobic strains the lowest adhesion is shown for the PU/0
combination. For P. tetradius, P. anaerobius, C. perfringens, C. innocuum, and
F. necrophorum, PU/0 shows the lowest adhesion. For B. fragilis, V/A gave a slightly higher level of recovery than PU/0.
These results indicate that the higher percentages of recovery with PU/0 upon transport are at least partly due to less adhesion of organisms to the swab material.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 2.
Recovery levels of individual anaerobic and aerobic
strains tested on six different combinations of swabs and media at
time zeroa
|
|
In addition, the performances of PU/0 and V/A were investigated with
clinical specimens. A total of 30 pus samples obtained from 27 different patients by drainage of abscesses were used; they included
specimens of intra-abdominal origin (n = 11),
specimens from the neck (n = 1), the sinus maxillaris
(n = 3), and the thorax (n = 7), and 8 specimens of unknown origin. The samples were inoculated semiquantitatively (by inoculating loops) on selective or nonselective plates and were vortexed in broth. From the same samples, swabs were
taken and cultured in the same way after 0 and 24 h of storage at
4°C. The results (Table 3) obtained
with PU/0 were superior to those obtained with V/A. In total, 82 strains (32 species) were isolated. At 0 h of incubation, 60 of
the 82 strains were isolated with PU/0 versus 46 of the 82 strains with
V/A. When the inoculation loops were used, 44 strains were isolated.
After 24 h of storage, 52 and 39 strains were isolated from PU/0
and V/A, respectively. With PU/0 an additional 27 strains were
isolated, which were not isolated by using V/A or inoculation loops.
When V/A or the inoculation loops were used, three or six additional strains were isolated, respectively, which were not cultured from PU/0.
We conclude that the combination PU/0 yields the highest recovery
levels during the first 24 h. Our experiment shows that the
relative proportions of bacteria are severely disturbed when swabs are
not processed within 24 h after sampling, since some strains die
while others show growth.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Laboratory for
Medical Microbiology, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands. Phone: 31 50 3633510. Fax: 31 50 3633528. E-mail:
E.Roelofsen{at}med.rug.nl.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Alfa, M., and A. Lee.
1982.
A transport method for swab specimens submitted for aerobic and anaerobic bacteriology.
J. Clin. Pathol.
35:555-560[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Baron, E. J.,
M. L. Vaisanen,
M. McTeague,
C. A. Strong,
D. Norman, and S. M. Finegold.
1993.
Comparison of the Accu-CulShure system and a swab placed in a B-D Port-a-Cul tube for specimen collection and transport.
Clin. Infect. Dis.
16(Suppl. 4):S325-S327.
|
| 3.
|
Brook, I.
1987.
Comparison of two transport systems for recovery of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria from abscesses.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
25:2020-2022[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Collee, J. G.
1980.
Factors contributing to loss of anaerobic bacteria in transit from the patient to the laboratory.
Infection
8(Suppl. 2):S145-S147.
|
| 5.
|
Collee, J. G.,
B. Watt,
R. Brown, and S. Johnstone.
1974.
The recovery of anaerobic bacteria from swabs.
J. Hyg.
72:339-347.
|
| 6.
|
Johnson, S.,
F. Lebahn,
L. R. Peterson, and D. N. Gerding.
1995.
Use of an anaerobic collection and transport swab device to recover anaerobic bacteria from infected foot ulcers in diabetics.
Clin. Infect. Dis.
20(Suppl. 2):S289-S290.
|
| 7.
|
Perry, J. L.
1997.
Assessment of swab transport systems for aerobic and anaerobic organism recovery.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
35:1269-1271[Abstract].
|
| 8.
|
Summanen, P.,
E. J. Baron,
D. Citron,
C. A. Strong,
H. M. Wexler, and S. M. Finegold.
1993.
Wadsworth anaerobic bacteriology manual.
Star Publishing Company, Belmont, Calif.
|
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, September 1999, p. 3041-3043, Vol. 37, No. 9
0095-1137/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Stoner, K. A., Rabe, L. K., Austin, M. N., Meyn, L. A., Hillier, S. L.
(2008). Quantitative Survival of Aerobic and Anaerobic Microorganisms in Port-A-Cul and Copan Transport Systems. J. Clin. Microbiol.
46: 2739-2744
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lee, J., Broughton, R. M., Akdag, A., Worley, S.D., Huang, T.-S.
(2007). Antimicrobial Fibers Created via Polycarboxylic Acid Durable Press Finishing. Textile Research Journal
77: 604-611
[Abstract]
-
Osterblad, M., Jarvinen, H., Lonnqvist, K., Huikko, S., Laippala, P., Viljanto, J., Arvilommi, H., Huovinen, P.
(2003). Evaluation of a New Cellulose Sponge-Tipped Swab for Microbiological Sampling: a Laboratory and Clinical Investigation. J. Clin. Microbiol.
41: 1894-1900
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Farhat, S. E., Thibault, M., Devlin, R.
(2001). Efficacy of a Swab Transport System in Maintaining Viability of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Streptococcus pneumoniae. J. Clin. Microbiol.
39: 2958-2960
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hindiyeh, M., Acevedo, V., Carroll, K. C.
(2001). Comparison of Three Transport Systems (Starplex StarSwab II, the New Copan Vi-Pak Amies Agar Gel Collection and Transport Swabs, and BBL Port-A-Cul) for Maintenance of Anaerobic and Fastidious Aerobic Organisms. J. Clin. Microbiol.
39: 377-380
[Abstract]
[Full Text]