Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, January 2000, p. 22-26, Vol. 38, No. 1
0095-1137/0/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Comparative Analysis of PCR versus Culture for
Diagnosis of Ulceroglandular Tularemia
Anders
Johansson,1
Lennart
Berglund,2
Ulla
Eriksson,3
Ingela
Göransson,3
Ralfh
Wollin,4
Mats
Forsman,3
Arne
Tärnvik,1 and
Anders
Sjöstedt3,5,*
Department of Clinical Microbiology, Division
of Infectious Diseases,1 and Department
of Clinical Microbiology, Division of
Bacteriology,5 Umeå University, S-901 85 Umeå,
Primary Health Care Center, S-827 25 Ljusdal,2 Department of Microbiology,
Defence Research Establishment, S-901 82 Umeå,3
and Department of Bacteriology, Swedish Institute of
Infectious Disease Control, S-105 21 Stockholm,4
Sweden
Received 4 May 1999/Accepted 30 September 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
PCR and culture were comparatively evaluated for their abilities to
demonstrate Francisella tularensis in wound specimens from
tularemia patients during an outbreak in Sweden in 1998. For transport
of the specimens used for PCR, a buffer solution containing a nuclease
inhibitor was used, and for transport of the specimens used for
culture, a commercial transport system was selected after experimental
comparison of various systems. Of 40 patients with culture- and/or
serology-verified ulceroglandular tularemia, PCR detected F. tularensis DNA in 30 (75%) patients, whereas culture detected
bacterial growth in 25 (62%) patients. Compared to data from a
previous study, the present inclusion of a nuclease inhibitor in the
transport medium did not improve the sensitivity of the PCR, whereas
the sensitivity of the culture procedure was significantly increased by
selection of the system used for transport. Among eight patients with
clinically suspected tularemia but with negative serology and culture,
specimens from four patients showed detectable DNA. In three of these
patients the diagnosis was verified by the demonstration of an F. tularensis-specific T-cell response in vitro. In conclusion, PCR
was more sensitive than culture for demonstration of F. tularensis in wound specimens. Besides, we showed that tularemia
may proceed without development of serum antibodies, and in these
patients, PCR may be of special importance for verification of the diagnosis.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Francisella tularensis is
endemic throughout the Northern Hemisphere and causes outbreaks of
tularemia in various mammals including rodents, lagomorphs, and humans.
In humans, the clinical presentation depends on the route of entrance
of the bacteria. The ulceroglandular form of the disease is acquired
either by direct contact with an infected animal or by vector
transmission. Patients typically present with fever, enlarged and
tender lymph nodes, and an ulcer at the place of entry (4,
5). The skin lesion is usually slight, and the appearance of an
infected insect bite need not actually differ from that of a
noninfected bite.
F. tularensis is highly virulent, and in diagnostic work
involving culture procedures, nonvaccinated staff are at high risk of
acquiring clinical disease (3). In most clinical
laboratories, serology is the only diagnostic test used. Exceptions are
patients with septicemia in whom tularemia may be diagnosed more or
less accidentally by growth of F. tularensis in blood
cultures. Consequently, some work is performed to optimize the blood
culture procedure for F. tularensis (11, 12).
There is, however, little experience with the use of culture of wound
specimens in clinical diagnostic work. The optimal way of sampling and
the optimal handling of wound specimens during transport are unknown,
and therefore, the potential efficacy of the procedure is also unknown.
Rapid methods for the identification of F. tularensis such
as the immunofluorescence assay and the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of antigen and the RNA hybridization assay have
been tried but have so far not been included in routine diagnostics (9; M. Forsman, K. Kuoppa, A. Sjöstedt, and A. Tärnvik, Letter, Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.
9:784-785, 1990; A. Tärnvik, S. Löfgren, L. Öhlund, and G. Sandström, Letter, Eur. J. Clin.
Microbiol. 6:318-319, 1987). We recently introduced PCR for
the demonstration of F. tularensis in wound specimens
(16). The method showed a high degree of specificity, and by
use of spiked samples, a sensitivity of 102 bacteria was
demonstrated. In an outbreak of ulceroglandular tularemia in Sweden in
1995, F. tularensis DNA was successfully amplified from
wound specimens from 29 of 40 patients. In that study, specimens were
sent in saline. When various methods for treatment of the specimens
prior to the PCR analysis were compared, the best success was achieved
by use of a protocol that included the nuclease inhibitor guanidine
thiocyanate as the lysis agent.
The use of PCR for the direct diagnosis of ulceroglandular tularemia is
thus highly promising, and more work on the conditions that might
influence the assay seems to be warranted. By inclusion of a nuclease
inhibitor in the transport medium, we addressed in the present study
the question of whether degradation during transport might adversely
affect the outcome of PCR. As regards culture, we compared various
transport systems by experimental inoculation and storage. When in
1998 a new outbreak of ulceroglandular tularemia occurred in the
same geographic region as the 1995 outbreak (16), we
compared the sensitivity of PCR with that of culture.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Bacteria.
F. tularensis live vaccine strain (LVS)
(ATCC 29684) was supplied by the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute
of Infectious Diseases, Fort Detrick, Frederick, Md. A virulent strain
of F. tularensis (strain FSC200) was isolated from a patient
during the 1998 outbreak of ulceroglandular tularemia in central
Sweden. F. tularensis strains were handled under biosafety
level 3 laboratory conditions. Pseudomonas sp. strain CF600
was kindly provided by Victoria Shingler, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Bacterial transport systems.
Four different transport
systems were compared. First, a modified variant of the nonnutrient
Stuart medium intended for transport of gonococci (13) has
been used for several decades for transport of bacterial specimens and
was used during the 1995 outbreak of ulceroglandular tularemia
(16). Second, a modified Thayer-Martin medium
(14) routinely used in the laboratory for culture of F. tularensis was evaluated. It was supplemented with 7.5 mg
of colistin (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.) per liter, 2.5 mg of amphotericin B
(Bristol-Myers Squibb, New Brunswick, N.J.) per liter, 0.5 mg of
lincomycin (Upjohn, Kalamazoo, Mich.) per liter, 4 mg of trimethoprim (Duchefa, Haarlem, The Netherlands) per liter, and 10 mg of ampicillin (Duchefa) per liter as described previously (2). Sterile
saline (3-ml volumes) was also evaluated as a transport medium. Sterile cotton-tipped wood applicators (Selefatrade AB, Spånga, Sweden) were
used for inoculation of F. tularensis in all these media. Finally, we assessed a commercial transport system designed for transport of common anaerobic and aerobic pathogens
(7, 10); J. L. Perry,
D. R. Ballou, and J. L. Salyer, Letter, J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:3367-3368, 1997). The system included a
rayon-tipped plastic applicator and a tube containing Amies agar with
charcoal (Copan Italia, Brescia, Italy).
Patient samples.
In August and September 1998, tularemia
occurred along the Ljusnan River in central Sweden. Through general
practitioners, wound and blood samples were obtained from patients with
suspected ulceroglandular tularemia. Forty-eight patients (ages 1 to 83 years; mean age, 38.8 years; 22 females and 26 males) were included, but only 1 patient had received antibiotic treatment before the day of
the visit. Material was collected from the ulcer by use of two
applicators. A cotton-tipped applicator, intended for use in PCR
analysis, was transported in a sterile tube containing 1.0 ml of a
guanidine isothiocyanate-containing buffer (8), a solution
previously shown under experimental conditions to preserve F. tularensis DNA for at least 1 month without a loss of amplifiable material (16). A rayon-tipped applicator was sent in Amies
agar with charcoal for use in the culture diagnostic method. The
samples arrived at the laboratory after 1 to 3 days of transport. Blood samples were drawn from each patient while the patient was in the acute
phase of infection and 3 to 6 weeks after the onset of disease for
assay of F. tularensis-specific antibodies. Before a patient
was considered seronegative, at least four serum samples were analyzed
over a period of
2 months.
Culture diagnosis of tularemia.
After inoculation on a
modified Thayer-Martin agar plate (14) at 37°C in 5%
CO2 for 6 days, growth of F. tularensis was confirmed by slide agglutination with a commercial antiserum (Difco Laboratories, Augsburg, Germany) and DNA amplification by PCR.
Enzyme immunoassay.
For enzyme immunoassay, microplates were
coated with an F. tularensis carbohydrate-protein complex
(14), and serum samples, diluted 1/500, were assayed as
described previously (18). Samples from a large number of
subjects who denied that they had previously had tularemia or tularemia
vaccination showed mean ± standard deviation enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay values of 0.320 ± 0.084 for immunoglobulin G
(IgG) antibodies and 0.099 ± 0.011 for IgM antibodies, and on
that basis, an IgG value of
0.76 and an IgM value of
0.40 were
considered to confirm the diagnosis.
Preparation of DNA and PCR analysis.
A 450-µl volume was
collected from each patient sample that had been suspended in a
guanidine isothiocyanate-containing buffer (8), and the
volume was further diluted with the buffer to a final volume of 900 µl. DNA was prepared as described previously (8, 16) and
was dissolved in 12 µl of H2O for amplification in a
multiplex PCR with primer pairs specific to the gene encoding a 17-kDa
lipoprotein of F. tularensis LVS and to the human
-actin gene. The 17-kDa gene primers TUL4-435 and TUL4-863 (16)
yield an F. tularensis-specific, 0.4-kb fragment
(17), whereas the human
-actin gene primers yield a
0.2-kb fragment. In each PCR analysis, heat-killed F. tularensis and H2O were included as controls. The
reaction mixture contained (at a final concentration) a mixture of
deoxynucleoside triphosphates (Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden) at a
concentration of 200 µM, each primer (Pharmacia Biotech) at a
concentration of 0.8 µM, 3 mM MgCl2, and 1 U of
thermostable Taq polymerase in 25 µl of Taq
reaction buffer (Advanced Biotechnologies, London, United Kingdom). To
each reaction mixture, 3 µl of sample was added for denaturation at
94°C for 3 min in a DNA Progene thermal cycler (Techne, Cambridge,
United Kingdom), followed by amplification for 30 cycles. Each cycle
consisted of denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, primer annealing at
65°C for 30 s, and primer extension at 72°C for 1 min. After a
final extension at 72°C for 5 min, the tubes were stored at 4°C
until a 5-µl portion of each reaction mixture was subjected to
electrophoresis in a 2% agarose gel. After ethidium bromide staining,
the amplified gene products were visualized with UV light.
Competitive PCR.
A 1,141-bp fragment of the
Francisella 16S rRNA gene (rDNA) was amplified from patient
samples by use of a genus-specific primer pair, primers F5 and F11
(6). For use as an internal standard, a 673-bp DNA fragment
was generated from the 2,3-dioxygenase-encoding gene (dmpB
gene) of Pseudomonas sp. strain CF600 (1) with
the composite primers F11dmpF and F5dmpR. The primer F11dmpF
(5'-TACCAGTTGGAAACGACTGTATCGACGAGGACTGCCTGAA) consisted of primer F11 (boldface letters) appended to the 5' end
of bases 259 to 278 of the dmpB gene, and F5dmpF
(CCTTTTTGAGTTTCGCTCCCCAGCCAGGTCACGGGCTT) consisted of primer F5 (boldface letters) appended to the 5' end of bases 892 to 874 of the dmpB gene. These primers thus
generated a fragment flanked by the binding sequences for primers F5
and F11. To ascertain that Francisella 16S rDNA and the
internal standard construct were amplified with similar efficiencies,
an equal molar amount of the respective target was amplified
separately. Aliquots were removed after cycles 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30, and the quantity of each amplicon was plotted in relation to the number
of cycles. In three experiments, no significant differences in the
slope coefficients for the linear portions of two curves were found. The amount of 16S rDNA on ethidium bromide-stained agarose gels was
estimated by identifying the dilution of the competitor fragment that
after amplification showed the same intensity as the amplicon of the
sample DNA after correction for the different lengths of the two fragments.
Assay of proliferative T-cell response.
Peripheral blood
mononuclear cells were prepared from heparinized blood by
centrifugation on a Ficoll-Metrizoate gradient (Lymphoprep; NYCOMED AS,
Oslo, Norway), and cultures were established. Each culture (200 µl)
contained 3 × 105 mononuclear cells. The culture
medium consisted of RPMI-HEPES (GIBCO Laboratories, Grand Island, N.Y.)
supplemented with 15% pooled human serum, 100 µg of gentamicin per
ml, and 2 mM L-glutamine. Concanavalin A (10 µg/ml) or
heat-killed F. tularensis (105 cells/ml) was
used as a stimulating agent. In preliminary experiments, these
concentrations were found to be optimal. To estimate the proliferative
response, five replicate cultures were incubated at 37°C for 4 days,
pulsed for 6 h with 1 µCi of [3H]thymidine, and
harvested. The proliferative indices were calculated by dividing the
mean for cultures with and without stimulating agent. Concanavalin
A-stimulated cell cultures all showed proliferative indices of >3.
Recovery of F. tularensis in various transport
systems.
To compare the various transport media, a virulent strain
(strain FSC200) of F. tularensis, which was isolated from a
Swedish patient in 1998 and passaged only once, and live vaccine strain F. tularensis LVS (ATCC 29684) were used. Bacteria were
grown on modified Thayer-Martin medium and were suspended in saline at
a density of 107 cells/ml. Portions of 0.1 ml were
collected from the suspension by inserting a tipped applicator for
5 s. The applicator was stored in a transport medium at room
temperature for a given period of time, removed, and rotated vigorously
for 60 s in 200 µl of saline for determination of viable counts.
For PCR analysis, a 50-µl portion was transferred to a tube
containing 1.0 ml of the guanidine isothiocyanate-containing buffer.
The DNA of the lysed bacteria was prepared as described previously
(8) and was subjected to PCR with TUL4-435 and TUL4-863 as
primers. Applicators inoculated in saline were used as negative
controls. After amplification, a 5-µl portion of each reaction
mixture was subjected to electrophoresis in a 2% agarose gel. The
amplified gene products were visualized with UV light after ethidium
bromide staining.
 |
RESULTS |
Survival of F. tularensis in various transport
media.
The survival of F. tularensis after storage in
modified Stuart medium, saline, or Amies agar with charcoal was tested
for two different strains of F. tularensis, a recent patient
isolate, strain FSC200, and the live vaccine strain, strain LVS.
Irrespective of the strain used, storage in saline or Stuart medium
resulted in a significant reduction in bacterial numbers within 4 h, and 2 days after inoculation of 1.5 × 106 or
5.5 × 106 organisms, no viable bacteria were
demonstrated (Table 1). In contrast,
Amies agar with charcoal (Copan) preserved bacterial viability for 1 week, and after 7 days bacterial numbers had decreased
1
log10. Irrespective of the medium, PCR analysis performed
after 7 days of storage showed the presence of F. tularensis
DNA. Control samples containing saline showed no visible amplicons.
Thayer-Martin medium modified by the addition of antibiotics was
repeatedly found to preserve bacterial viability as effectively as
Amies agar with charcoal (data not shown).
Culture and PCR analysis of wound specimens.
Wound specimens
from 48 patients with clinically suspected tularemia were sent in Amies
agar with charcoal for culture and in guanidine
isothiocyanate-containing buffer for PCR. For 40 patients the diagnosis
was confirmed by serology and/or culture. F. tularensis was
isolated from 25 (62%) of these 40 patients, and F. tularensis DNA was successfully amplified from 30 (75%) of these
40 patients (Table 2).
-Actin DNA was
amplifiable from all 30 F. tularensis DNA-containing
specimens. For 4 of 10 F. tularensis DNA-negative specimens,
however,
-actin DNA was not detected, indicating that these
specimens may not have contained significant amounts of biological
material. Thus, F. tularensis DNA was detected in 30 (83%)
of 36 patients from whose samples
-actin DNA was amplified.
T-cell response to F. tularensis of patients with
detectable F. tularensis DNA but negative serology and
culture.
In eight patients with clinically suspected tularemia,
neither serology of samples obtained over
12 weeks nor wound culture confirmed the diagnosis (Table 3).
F. tularensis DNA was successfully amplified from wound
samples from four of these patients. To more fully investigate the
latter patients with regard to laboratory-based evidence of tularemia,
the in vitro T-cell stimulation test was performed. In three of the
patients, a recall T-cell response to F. tularensis was
demonstrated ~5 months after onset of disease (Table
4). Stimulatory indices were >3.0 times
higher than the background value, whereas it was <2.3 times higher for
seven reference subjects who lacked a history of tularemia or tularemia
vaccination. The fourth patient showed a stimulatory index of 1.0. The
latter patient showed no typical signs of tularemia, and specific
antibiotic treatment was not instituted.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 4.
T-cell response to F. tularensis of patients
showing detectable F. tularensis DNA in wound specimens
but no evidence of tularemia by culture
or serology
|
|
Quantitation of F. tularensis DNA in wound
samples.
A competitive PCR was used to assess the amount of DNA
present in six specimens (three PCR- and culture-positive specimens and
three PCR-positive and culture-negative specimens) obtained during the
1995 tularemia outbreak. For all investigated samples, the estimated
amount of DNA varied from 106 to 107 genomic
equivalents per specimen. Results of a representative analysis are
shown in Fig. 1.

View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Competitive PCR analysis for quantitative estimation of
F. tularensis 16S rDNA in wound specimens from tularemia
patients. Results of a representative analysis are shown. The amount of
16S rDNA was estimated by identifying the dilution of competitor
fragment showing the same intensity as the amplicon of the sample DNA
after amplification.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Although the nutritional requirements of F. tularensis
have been known for decades, there has been little experience with the
use of culture for the routine diagnosis of tularemia. Due to the high
degree of virulence of the organism, culture of wound specimens is
normally avoided (5). A more general use of culture for the
diagnosis of tularemia has been reported only from Scandinavia, where
the less virulent subspecies F. tularensis subsp.
holarctica is endemic (4, 16). In one of the
latter studies (16), the sensitivity of the culture
procedure was found to be as low as 25%. In that study a modified
Stuart medium was used for transport, but it was found to be suboptimal
in the present study. According to the present experiments with spiked
samples, a commercial transport medium and a medium recommended for
culture were more preservative. When the commercial medium was used as
the transport medium for specimens from the present outbreak, a
sensitivity of 62% was recorded. The transport medium thus seemed to
be important for the success of culture of F. tularensis
from wound specimens.
Due to hazards associated with culture, ulceroglandular tularemia seems
to be a perfect target for gene-based pathogen identification. PCR for
identification of the gene encoding a 17-kDa outer membrane lipoprotein
allows the sensitive identification of F. tularensis. The
gene is conserved among various strains of F. tularensis and shows no significant similarity to other prokaryotic or eukaryotic gene
sequences in current gene banks. F. tularensis is not
closely related to organisms known to be associated with human
infection or colonization (6), thus further minimizing
problems with interpretation of the findings.
According to the present results and those of a previous study
(16), the sensitivity of PCR applied to wound specimens from patients with ulceroglandular tularemia is ~75%. In principle, a
failure to detect DNA may be due either to inefficient sampling or to
degradation of DNA during transport. The present and previous results
favor the first explanation. If degradation was the main problem, the
present inclusion of a nuclease inhibitor in the transport medium would
have been expected to result in an increased sensitivity. The
sensitivity was, however, not higher than that found when samples were
sent in saline (16). Moreover, some samples would have been
expected to contain relatively small amounts of amplifiable DNA. When
six samples were subjected to quantitative PCR, all were found to have
large amounts of DNA (106 to 107 genomic
equivalents). In line with this, we previously showed that the success
of PCR amplification was not decisively affected by the time of
transport (16).
If the transport is not the weak link of the present PCR application,
difficulties associated with sampling may be the more important. Some
of those specimens that lacked amplifiable F. tularensis DNA
also lacked amounts of
-actin DNA sufficient for PCR detection,
indicating that in those samples, no or very little biological material
was present. By contrast,
-actin DNA was amplified from all 30 samples in which F. tularensis-specific DNA was detectable.
Moreover, only 1 of the 10 PCR-negative samples was culture positive.
It should be recalled that in some patients with tularemia, the ulcer
is very slight, and it may even be difficult to distinguish between an
infected and a noninfected mosquito bite (4). Thus, the
sensitivity of the PCR may well be restricted by difficulty with
obtaining representative material. To improve sensitivity, intense
rubbing of the wound surface may be tried, and sampling from more than
one lesion may also be attempted. When lesions are minute or dry, a
skin biopsy might be useful.
In the present study we identified four patients with clinically
suspected tularemia but with repeated negative serology results when
their sera were tested up to 12 weeks after the onset of symptoms and
with negative culture results. When subjected to the T-cell stimulation
test, three of them showed a strong cell-mediated immune response to
F. tularensis. In previous vaccination trials, such a lack
of correlation between serological and cell-mediated responses to the
organism has been demonstrated, and similar to the patients in the
present study, some of the vaccinees showed a strong T-cell response
but no antibodies (18, 19). In clinical studies of
tularemia, there are virtually no reports of the absence of antibodies
in patients who were monitored by serologic testing for several weeks.
A problem, however, is that the presence of serum antibodies is often
used as an inclusion criterion for a study, and seronegative patients
with tularemia may thereby be excluded a priori. In the present study
those three patients who failed to respond with detectable antibodies
all received treatment within 2 days of the onset of disease. An
inhibitory effect of the early institution of antibiotics on the
serological response in tularemia has been suggested previously
(15). In essence, PCR may verify some cases of tularemia
that would otherwise escape detection.
Thus, under transport conditions believed to preserve the viability of
F. tularensis, in the present study PCR showed a sensitivity of ~75% and culture showed a sensitivity of 62%. Moreover, PCR allowed detection of some cases of tularemia that failed to be detected
by culture or serology. The sensitivity of PCR may possibly be
restricted by difficulty with obtaining representative material from
all patients.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Stig Granström for expert advice on transport
systems for culture specimens and Michal Kroca and Thorsten Johansson for help with lymphocyte stimulation assays.
Financial support was obtained from the Swedish Medical Research
Council (grant 9485), Västerbottens Landsting, and the Medical Faculty, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Division of
Bacteriology, Department of Clinical Microbiology, Umeå University,
S-901 85 Umeå, Sweden. Phone: 46 90 7851120. Fax: 46 90 7852225. E-mail: anders.sjostedt{at}infdis.umu.se.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Bartilson, M., and V. Shingler.
1989.
Nucleotide sequence and expression of the catechol 2,3-dioxygenase-encoding gene of phenol-catabolizing Pseudomonas CF600.
Gene
85:233-238[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Berdal, B. P., and E. Söderlund.
1977.
Cultivation and isolation of Francisella tularensis on selective chocolate agar, as used routinely for the isolation of gonococci.
Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Scand. Sect. B
85:108-109.
|
| 3.
|
Burke, D. S.
1977.
Immunization against tularemia: analysis of the effectiveness of live Francisella tularensis vaccine in prevention of laboratory-acquired tularemia.
J. Infect. Dis.
135:55-60[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Christenson, B.
1984.
An outbreak of tularemia in the northern part of central Sweden.
Scand. J. Infect. Dis.
16:285-290[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Evans, M. E.,
D. W. Gregory,
W. Schaffner, and Z. A. McGee.
1985.
Tularemia: a 30-year experience with 88 cases.
Medicine (Baltimore)
64:251-269[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Forsman, M.,
G. Sandström, and A. Sjöstedt.
1994.
Analysis of 16S ribosomal DNA sequences of Francisella strains and utilization for determination of the phylogeny of the genus and for identification of strains by PCR.
Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.
44:38-46[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Hudspeth, M. K.,
D. M. Citron, and E. J. Goldstein.
1997.
Evaluation of a novel specimen transport system (Venturi Transystem) for anaerobic bacteria.
Clin. Infect. Dis.
25(Suppl. 2):S132-S133.
|
| 8.
|
Ibrahim, A.,
L. Norlander,
A. Macellaro, and A. Sjöstedt.
1997.
Specific detection of Coxiella burnetii through partial amplification of 23S rDNA.
Eur. J. Epidemiol.
13:329-334[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Karlsson, K. A., and O. Söderlind.
1973.
Studies of the diagnosis of tularemia, p. 224-230.
In
S. Winblad (ed.), Contributions to microbiology and immunology, vol. 2. Yersinia, Pasteurella and Francisella. A symposium. S. Karger, Basel, Switzerland.
|
| 10.
|
Perry, J. L.
1997.
Assessment of swab transport systems for aerobic and anaerobic organism recovery.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
35:1269-1271[Abstract].
|
| 11.
|
Provenza, J. M.,
S. A. Klotz, and R. L. Penn.
1986.
Isolation of Francisella tularensis from blood.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
24:453-455[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Reary, B. W., and S. A. Klotz.
1988.
Enhancing recovery of Francisella tularensis from blood.
Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.
11:117-119[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Ringertz, O.
1960.
A modified Stuart medium for the transport of gonococcal specimens.
Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Scand.
74:371-380.
|
| 14.
|
Sandström, G.,
A. Tärnvik,
H. Wolf-Watz, and S. Löfgren.
1984.
Antigen from Francisella tularensis: nonidentity between determinants participating in cell-mediated and humoral reactions.
Infect. Immun.
45:101-106[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Saslaw, S., and S. Carhart.
1961.
Studies with tularemia vaccines in volunteers. III. Serological aspects following intracutaneous or respiratory challenge in both vaccinated and nonvaccinated volunteers.
Am. J. Med. Sci.
241:689-699[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Sjöstedt, A.,
U. Eriksson,
L. Berglund, and A. Tärnvik.
1997.
Detection of Francisella tularensis in ulcers of patients with tularemia by PCR.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
35:1045-1048[Abstract].
|
| 17.
|
Sjöstedt, A.,
K. Kuoppa,
T. Johansson, and G. Sandström.
1992.
The 17 kDa lipoprotein and encoding gene of Francisella tularensis LVS are conserved in strains of Francisella tularensis.
Microb. Pathog.
13:243-249[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Tärnvik, A.,
M. L. Löfgren,
S. Löfgren,
G. Sandström, and H. Wolf-Watz.
1985.
Long-lasting cell-mediated immunity induced by a live Francisella tularensis vaccine.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
22:527-530[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Tärnvik, A., and S. Löfgren.
1975.
Stimulation of human lymphocytes by a vaccine strain of Francisella tularensis.
Infect. Immun.
12:951-957[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, January 2000, p. 22-26, Vol. 38, No. 1
0095-1137/0/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Eliasson, H., Olcen, P., Sjostedt, A., Jurstrand, M., Back, E., Andersson, S.
(2008). Kinetics of the Immune Response Associated with Tularemia: Comparison of an Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, a Tube Agglutination Test, and a Novel Whole-Blood Lymphocyte Stimulation Test. CVI
15: 1238-1243
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kantardjiev, T., Padeshki, P., Ivanov, I. N
(2007). Diagnostic approaches for oculoglandular tularemia: advantages of PCR. Br J Ophthalmol
91: 1206-1208
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Checroun, C., Wehrly, T. D., Fischer, E. R., Hayes, S. F., Celli, J.
(2006). From the Cover: Autophagy-mediated reentry of Francisella tularensis into the endocytic compartment after cytoplasmic replication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
103: 14578-14583
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Andersson, H., Hartmanova, B., KuoLee, R., Ryden, P., Conlan, W., Chen, W., Sjostedt, A.
(2006). Transcriptional profiling of host responses in mouse lungs following aerosol infection with type A Francisella tularensis.. J Med Microbiol
55: 263-271
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bystrom, M., Bocher, S., Magnusson, A., Prag, J., Johansson, A.
(2005). Tularemia in Denmark: Identification of a Francisella tularensis subsp. holarctica Strain by Real-Time PCR and High-Resolution Typing by Multiple-Locus Variable-Number Tandem Repeat Analysis. J. Clin. Microbiol.
43: 5355-5358
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Petersen, J. M., Schriefer, M. E., Gage, K. L., Montenieri, J. A., Carter, L. G., Stanley, M., Chu, M. C.
(2004). Methods for Enhanced Culture Recovery of Francisella tularensis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
70: 3733-3735
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Versage, J. L., Severin, D. D. M., Chu, M. C., Petersen, J. M.
(2003). Development of a Multitarget Real-Time TaqMan PCR Assay for Enhanced Detection of Francisella tularensis in Complex Specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol.
41: 5492-5499
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Dembek, Z. F., Buckman, R. L., Fowler, S. K., Hadler, J. L.
(2003). Missed Sentinel Case of Naturally Occurring Pneumonic Tularemia Outbreak: Lessons for Detection of Bioterrorism. J Am Board Fam Med
16: 339-342
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Tarnvik, A., Berglund, L.
(2003). Tularaemia. Eur Respir J
21: 361-373
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Emanuel, P. A., Bell, R., Dang, J. L., McClanahan, R., David, J. C., Burgess, R. J., Thompson, J., Collins, L., Hadfield, T.
(2003). Detection of Francisella tularensis within Infected Mouse Tissues by Using a Hand-Held PCR Thermocycler. J. Clin. Microbiol.
41: 689-693
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ellis, J., Oyston, P. C. F., Green, M., Titball, R. W.
(2002). Tularemia. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
15: 631-646
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Garcia Del Blanco, N., Dobson, M. E., Vela, A. I., De La Puente, V. A., Gutierrez, C. B., Hadfield, T. L., Kuhnert, P., Frey, J., Dominguez, L., Rodriguez Ferri, E. F.
(2002). Genotyping of Francisella tularensis Strains by Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis, Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism Fingerprinting, and 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing. J. Clin. Microbiol.
40: 2964-2972
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Farlow, J., Smith, K. L., Wong, J., Abrams, M., Lytle, M., Keim, P.
(2001). Francisella tularensis Strain Typing Using Multiple-Locus, Variable-Number Tandem Repeat Analysis. J. Clin. Microbiol.
39: 3186-3192
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Johansson, A., Ibrahim, A., Göransson, I., Eriksson, U., Gurycova, D., Clarridge, J. E. III, Sjöstedt, A.
(2000). Evaluation of PCR-Based Methods for Discrimination of Francisella Species and Subspecies and Development of a Specific PCR That Distinguishes the Two Major Subspecies of Francisella tularensis. J. Clin. Microbiol.
38: 4180-4185
[Abstract]
[Full Text]