JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cascina, A.
Right arrow Articles by Casali, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cascina, A.
Right arrow Articles by Casali, L.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, January 2000, p. 466-466, Vol. 38, No. 1
0095-1137/0/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Is a Large Number of Sputum Specimens Necessary for the Bacteriological Diagnosis of Tuberculosis?


    LETTER

The recent increase in tuberculosis (TB) incidence (7) has further focused interest on efforts to design more effective diagnostic procedures to improve classical diagnostic methodologies for the disorder (1, 2, 5, 6). The recent paper by Nelson and coworkers (3), concerning the contribution of the number of specimens to the efficiency of TB diagnosis, prompted us to retrospectively review results of acid-fast bacillus (AFB) smears and cultures of patients diagnosed with culture-proven pulmonary TB at the Institute of Respiratory Diseases of Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Italy, in the period from 1989 to 1998, in order to assess the diagnostic benefit of analyzing three or more sputum or other respiratory specimens for the diagnosis of pulmonary TB.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1.   Frequency distribution of the first positive specimen for patients for whom three or more specimens were collected for AFB smear and culture

AFB were detected microscopically in sputum concentrates with Ziehl-Neelsen stain, and sputum sediments were inoculated onto Löwenstein-Jensen medium slants (4). Cultures were incubated at 37°C for up to 8 weeks, and isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex were identified by using the GenProbe hydridization assay.

Between 1989 and 1998, our mycobacteriology laboratory received a total of 4,173 respiratory specimens for AFB smear and culture, 359 (9%) of these being positive for M. tuberculosis complex. The positive cultures were obtained from sputum specimens (78%), bronchoalveolar lavage specimens (17%), pleural fluid specimens (4%), and lung biopsy specimens (1%). During this 10-year period, 192 individuals were diagnosed with culture-proven pulmonary TB. For 127 patients (66%), M. tuberculosis was isolated from one or more sputum specimens. The remaining 65 cases (34%) were diagnosed by recovering the microorganism in bronchoalveolar lavage specimens (52 cases), pleural fluid specimens (10 cases), and lung biopsy specimens (3 cases). Among the M. tuberuclosis culture-positive subjects, for 76 (40%) a single respiratory specimen was submitted to the laboratory, with 43% positive by AFB smear (33 of 76). For 32 persons (17%) two specimens were examined for mycobacteria, with at least one positive AFB smear for 50% of patients (16 of 32), and for 84 patients (44%) three or more respiratory specimens were sent for examination (Table 1). In this group, AFB smear was at least once positive for 67% of patients (56 of 84). The first culture proved to be positive was the first specimen for 64 of 84 (76%) patients either smear positive or smear negative. The first positive culture was obtained from the second and the third specimen for 16% (13 of 84) and 8% (7 of 84) of either smear-positive or smear-negative patients, respectively.

These findings substantially agree with those shown by Nelson et al. (3) and confirm that the first and the second specimen enable M. tuberculosis isolation from a majority of patients (92%), while the third or a subsequent specimen collected is of little diagnostic relevance (8%). Processing and examining these additional specimens likely do not compensate for the increased per patient cost for TB diagnosis (a total of about $40 per sputum specimen at our institution). Nevertheless, a careful analysis of data from different institutions is required to establish the adequate number of specimens which should be collected.


    REFERENCES

1. Brunello, F., F. Favari, and R. Fontana. 1999. Comparison of the MB/BacT and BACTEC 460 TB systems for recovery of mycobacteria from various clinical specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:1206-1209[Abstract/Free Full Text].
2. Hall, G. S. 1997. Newer methodologies in isolation and identication of Mycobacterium species. Infect. Dis. Clin. Pract. 6:369-373.
3. Nelson, S. M., M. A. Deike, and C. P. Cartwright. 1998. Value of examining multiple sputum specimens in the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:467-469[Abstract/Free Full Text].
4. Nolte, F. S., and B. Metchock. 1995. Mycobacteria, p. 400-437. In P. R. Murray, E. J. Baron, M. A. Pfaller, F. C. Tenover, and R. H. Yolken (ed.), Manual of clinical microbiology, 6th ed. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
5. Saceanu, C. A., N. C. Pfeiffer, and T. McLean. 1993. Evaluation of sputum smears concentrated by centrifugation for detection of acid-fast bacilli. J. Clin. Microbiol. 31:2371-2374[Abstract/Free Full Text].
6. Somoskövi, Á., and P. Magyar. 1999. Comparison of the mycobacteria growth indicator tube with MD Redox, Löwenstein-Jensen, and Middlebrook 7H11 media for recovery of mycobacteria in clinical specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:1366-1369[Abstract/Free Full Text].
7. World Health Organization. 1998. The world health report, 1998. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Alessandro Cascina
Anna Fietta
Lucio Casali*
Institute and Clinic of Respiratory Diseases
I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia
Viale Golgi 19
27100 Pavia, Italy
*Phone: 390382422232
Fax: 390382422267


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, January 2000, p. 466-466, Vol. 38, No. 1
0095-1137/0/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cascina, A.
Right arrow Articles by Casali, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cascina, A.
Right arrow Articles by Casali, L.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS