This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sechi, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Zanetti, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sechi, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Zanetti, S.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, October 2000, p. 3837-3839, Vol. 38, No. 10
0095-1137/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Distribution of a Specific 500-Base-Pair Fragment in Mycobacterium bovis Isolates from Sardinian Cattle

Leonardo A. Sechi,1,* Ilaria Duprè,1 Guido Leori,2 Giovanni Fadda,3 and Stefania Zanetti1

Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche, Sezione di Microbiologia Sperimentale e Clinica, Università degli studi di Sassari,1 and Istituto Zooprofilattico della Sardegna,2 07100 Sassari, and Istituto di Microbiologia, Facoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia "Agostino Gemelli," Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome,3 Italy

Received 2 September 1999/Returned for modification 16 November 1999/Accepted 11 July 2000


    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

Amplification of a specific, 500-bp fragment from Mycobacterium bovis isolates and use of the fragment to differentiate between Mycobacterium tuberculosis and M. bovis was previously reported (J. G. Rodriguez, G. A. Meja, P. Del Portillo, M. E. Patarroyo, and L. A. Murillo, Microbiology 141:2131-2138, 1995). In the present study, 30 M. bovis isolates from Sardinian cattle were examined for the presence of this 500-bp fragment; 4 of the 30 isolates lacked the fragment. This result indicates that identification of M. bovis strains by amplification of the 500-bp sequence may lead to false-negative results.


    TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

Mycobacterium tuberculosis is the most common cause of tuberculosis in humans, but an unknown proportion of human tuberculosis is caused by Mycobacterium bovis (2, 6, 9, 14, 17). Human M. bovis infections are more common in areas of the world where bovine tuberculosis is uncontrolled and pasteurization of milk is not universal (2, 9). It is difficult to discriminate between M. tuberculosis and M. bovis with conventional methods (3, 11, 16). Recently, different molecular techniques have been proposed to rapidly identify and differentiate M. bovis, even directly in biological samples (6, 8, 12, 19, 20). The PCR assay reported by Rodríguez et al. (10, 11) is a simple and accurate method to identify and differentiate M. bovis.

In a surveillance study in Sardinia, Italy, we isolated 30 M. bovis strains from cattle. All isolates were confirmed to belong to the M. tuberculosis complex by PCR-restriction fragment polymorphism analysis (PRA) of the gene for the 65-kDa heat shock protein (hsp65) as previously described by Telenti et al. (18). The isolates were further identified as M. bovis by biochemical methods. PCR ribotyping and DNA fingerprinting with IS6110, enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus (ERIC)-PCR, and GTG5-PCR have already been reported for 22 of these isolates (14). In this study, the isolates were evaluated by the PCR assay described by Rodríguez et al. (10).

Thirty strains of M. bovis were isolated from cattle in various regions of Sardinia from 1996 to 1999. M. bovis ATCC 27290 was used as the positive control; M. tuberculosis strain H37Rv (American Type Culture Collection) and 20 M. tuberculosis clinical isolates were used as negative controls. All strains used in this study were identified as M. bovis by the following biochemical properties: scarce growth in glycerol, lack of detectable niacin production (kit from Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Mich.), negative results in tests for catalase and pyrazinamidase, and susceptibility to thiophene carboxylic hydrazide (8) (Sigma Chemical Co.). Isolates were maintained on Lowenstein-Jensen slants until subjected to further analysis.

Mycobacterial strains were grown in 10 ml of 7H9 medium with albumin dextrose catalase, and genomic DNA was extracted and analyzed as described previously (15).

All DNA amplifications were performed in a DNA thermal cycler (Hybaid, model TR3CM220; Omnigene, Teddington, United Kingdom). Strains were identified as belonging to the M. tuberculosis complex by PRA of the hsp65 gene (22). PRA was performed with primers tb11 (5'-ACCAACGATGGTGTGTCCAT) and tb12 (5'-CTTGTCGAACCGCATACCCT). Twenty microliters of the PCR product was digested by BstEII (Promega, Madison, Wis.) and HaeIII (New England Biolabs, Inc., Beverly, Mass.), and 15 µl of the restriction digest was loaded on a 2% (wt/vol) Metaphor agarose gel (FMC Bioproducts, Rockland, Maine) and visualized by staining with ethidium bromide.

The species-specific PCR proposed by Rodríguez et al. (10) was used to identify M. bovis strains. Primers JB21 (5'-TCGTCCGCTGATGCAAGTGC) and JB22 (5'-CGTCCGCTGACCTCAAGAAG) were used at a concentration of 20 pmol each, and the reaction was performed in a total volume of 50 µl containing 2.5 U of Taq polymerase, 20 mM Tris (pH 8.3), 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl, and 200 µM deoxynucleoside triphosphate (Gibco BRL Life Technology, Paisley, United Kingdom). Reaction mixtures were overlaid with 1 drop of paraffin oil and then incubated for 2 min at 94°C, followed by 35 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 68°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 10 min and a final extension at 70°C for 20 min. The amplification products were visualized after electrophoresis at 90 V for 90 min in a 1.8% Metaphor agarose gel and staining with ethidium bromide.

Sequencing of the 500-bp fragment was performed using the dideoxy chain termination method of Sanger et al. (13) with Sequenase (United States Biochemical Corporation, Cleveland, Ohio). A GenBank search (1) of the 500-bp sequence of strain 621-11 revealed identity with the M. bovis BCG 500-bp region sequenced by Gordon et al. (5). The 500-bp fragment is part of a 4,999-bp fragment that is not present in the M. tuberculosis H37Rv chromosome (1, 5). It is located at the 3' end of a putative gene called RvD1-Rv2031c.

Each of the isolates from Sardinian cattle was identified as M. bovis by biochemical methods. However, 4 of the 30 strains did not generate the 500-bp fragment (strains 868-30, 621-1, 621-2, and 621-10) (Fig. 1, lanes 4, 5, 6, and 7, respectively) when evaluated in the M. bovis PCR assay described by Rodríguez et al. (10) and assessed by ethidium bromide staining. The 500-bp sequence also was not detected in chromosomal DNA from these four strains as determined by hybridization (Fig. 2, lanes 1, 2, 3, and 4). These strains were confirmed as belonging to the M. tuberculosis complex by PRA of hsp65 (Fig. 3, lanes 1, 2, 3, and 4).


View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.   Agarose gel electrophoresis (Metaphor 1.8%) of DNA amplifications of the 500-bp fragment of different M. bovis clinical isolates. Lane M, molecular marker consisting of a 100-bp ladder (Gibco Life Science); lane 1, strain 621-11; lane 2, strain 621-13; lane 3, strain 621-15; lane 4, strain 868-30; lane 5, strain 621-1; lane 6, strain 621-2; lane 7, strain 621-10; lane 8, M. bovis ATCC 27290; lane 9, negative control.


View larger version (89K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2.   Southern blot of chromosomal DNA of different M. bovis isolates showing hybridization with the labeled 500-bp fragment. Lane 1, strain 868-30; lane 2, strain 621-1; lane 3, strain 621-2; lane 4, strain 621-10; lane 5, strain 621-11; lane 6, strain 621-13; lane 7, strain 621-15; lane 8, strain 621-16; lane 9, M. bovis ATCC 27290; lane M, molecular marker consisting of a 100-bp ladder; lambda , molecular marker consisting of HindIII-digested DNA.


View larger version (104K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3.   Agarose gel electrophoresis (Metaphor, 1.8%) of amplified DNA of the hsp65 gene digested with HaeIII and BstEII. Lane M, molecular marker V (Boehringer Mannheim, Monza, Italy); lane 1, strain 868-30; lane 2, strain 621-1; lane 3, strain 621-2; lane 4, strain 621-10; lane 5, strain 621-11; lane 6, M. bovis ATCC 27290; lane 7, M. avium as a negative control.

The results of other molecular characterizations of these four strains (14) were reviewed to determine if there were genetic differences between isolates lacking the 500-bp fragment. The four strains produced two different IS6110 fingerprinting patterns: strains 621-10 and 868-30 did not hybridize with the probe, whereas strains 621-1 and 621-2 produced a band of hybridization at 5.5 kb (14). The strains were also differentiated with two other previously published PCR-based fingerprinting methods, GTG5-PCR and PCR ribotyping (14). Strain 621-1 (which generated a 5.5-kb band of hybridization with IS6110 probe) and strain 621-10 (generating no bands with IS6110 fingerprinting) could not be differentiated by PCR ribotyping, whereas strains 868-30 and 621-2 produced different patterns after endonuclease digestion. GTG5-PCR discriminated strains 621-1 and 621-10 from strains 621-2 and 868-30 (14). Strains 621-1, 621-2, and 621-10 were isolated from different cattle of the same herd.

Our results have implications for the application of PCR in laboratory diagnosis of M. bovis infections. PCR has the potential to provide a more rapid, sensitive, and specific diagnostic assay than conventional methods for M. bovis identification in clinical specimens. Rodríguez et al. showed with PCR the presence of the 500-bp fragment in the chromosomes of 121 M. bovis isolates and M. tuberculosis strains isolated from sea lions (10). The present study demonstrates that not all M. bovis strains can be detected with primers directed toward the 500-bp fragment. Use of such primers can lead to false-negative results. Other PCR techniques, such as PCRs based on amplification of IS6110 (7), also can lead to false-negative results if used alone; we have found five M. bovis strains with no IS6110 insertions in their genomes (14). Strains 868-30 and 621-10 were negative in both the 500-bp fragment PCR and the IS6110 hybridization. Only the PRA of the hsp65 gene identified these strains as belonging to the M. tuberculosis complex. Thus, even the combined molecular tests (in this case, assays for IS6110 and the 500-bp fragment) can give false-negative results, and only the use of multiple molecular techniques and biochemical methods will ensure the proper identification of isolates.

Previous molecular data on the four isolates lacking the 500-bp fragment were reviewed (14). Two of the strains negative for the 500-bp fragment (868-30 and 621-10) generated the same pattern with GTG5-PCR and also with PCR ribotyping after HaeIII digestion (14), but they showed slightly different patterns with ERIC-PCR and PCR ribotyping after PvuII digestion (14). The GTG5-PCR pattern of these isolates was not found elsewhere among the Sardinian isolates examined (14). This indicates that the isolates were very similar; the herds from which these isolates originated are very close geographically and a common progenitor may have infected both herds.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported in part by the first and second national project "Tubercolosi" of the "Istituto Superiore di Sanità," Rome, Italy, and by grant 9806297296 from MURST.

We thank E. Manca and D. Delogu for technical help.


    FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche, Sezione di Microbiologia Sperimentale e Clinica, Università degli studi di Sassari, Viale S. Pietro 43/B, 07100 Sassari, Italy. Phone: 79 228303. Fax: 79 212345. E-mail: sechila{at}ssmain.uniss.it.


    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Text
References

1. Altschul, S. F., T. L. Madden, A. A. Schaffer, J. Zhang, Z. Zhang, W. Miller, and D. J. Lipman. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:3389-3402[Abstract/Free Full Text].
2. Cosivi, O., J. M. Grange, C. J. Daborn, M. C. Raviglione, T. Fujikura, D. Cousins, R. A. Robinson, H. F. A. K. Huchzermeyer, I. de Kantor, and F.-X. Meslin. 1998. Zoonotic tuberculosis due to Mycobacterium bovis in developing countries. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 4:1-15[Medline].
3. Cousins, D., S. Williams, E. Liébana, A. Aranaz, A. Bunschoten, J. Van Embden, and T. Ellis. 1998. Evaluation of four DNA typing techniques in epidemiological investigations of bovine tuberculosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:168-178[Abstract/Free Full Text].
4. Fadda, G., and S. L. Roe. 1984. Recovery and susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from extrapulmonary specimens by the BACTEC radiometric method. J. Clin. Microbiol. 19:720-721[Abstract/Free Full Text].
5. Gordon, S. V., R. Brosch, A. Billault, T. Garnier, K. Eiglmeier, and S. T. Cole. 1999. Identification of variable regions in the genomes of tubercle bacilli using bacterial chromosome arrays. Mol. Microbiol. 32:643-655[CrossRef][Medline].
6. Gutiérrez, M., S. Samper, M. S. Jiménez, J. D. A. van Embden, J. F. G. Marín, and C. Martín. 1997. Identification by spoligotyping of a caprine genotype in Mycobacterium bovis strains causing human tuberculosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:3328-3330[Abstract].
7. Liébana, E., A. Aranaz, L. Dominguez, A. Mateos, O. González Llamazares, E. F. Rodriguez-Ferri, M. Domingo, D. Vidal, and D. Cousins. 1997. The insertion element IS6110 is a useful tool for DNA fingerprinting of Mycobacterium bovis isolates from cattle and goats in Spain. Vet. Microbiol. 54:223-233[CrossRef][Medline].
8. Metchock, B. G., F. S. Nolte, and R. J. Wallace, Jr. 1999. Mycobacterium, p. 399-437. In P. R. Murray, E. J. Baron, M. A. Pfaller, F. C. Tenover, and R. H. Yolken (ed.), Manual of clinical microbiology, 7th ed. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
9. O'Reilly, L. M., and C. J. Daborn. 1995. The epidemiology of Mycobacterium bovis infection in animals and man: a review. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 76:1-46.
10. Rodríguez, J. G., J. C. Fissanoti, P. Del Portillo, M. E. Patarroyo, M. I. Romano, and A. Cataldi. 1999. Amplification of a 500-base-pair fragment from cultured isolates of Mycobacterium bovis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:2330-2332[Abstract/Free Full Text].
11. Rodriguez, J. G., G. A. Mejia, P. Del Portillo, M. E. Patarroyo, and L. A. Murillo. 1995. Species-specific identification of Mycobacterium bovis by PCR. Microbiology 141:2131-2138[Abstract/Free Full Text].
12. Romero, R. E., D. L. Garzon, G. A. Mejia, W. Monroy, M. E. Patarroyo, and L. A. Murillo. 1999. Identification of Mycobacterium bovis in bovine clinical samples by PCR species-specific primers. Can. J. Vet. Res. 63:101-106[Medline].
13. Sanger, F., S. Nicklen, and A. R. Coulson. 1977. DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74:5463-5467[Abstract/Free Full Text].
14. Sechi, L. A., G. Leori, S. A. Lollai, I. Duprè, P. Molicotti, G. Fadda, and S. Zanetti. 1999. Different strategies for molecular differentiation of Mycobacterium bovis strains isolated in Sardinia, Italy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:1781-1785[Abstract/Free Full Text].
15. Sechi, L. A., S. Zanetti, I. Duprè, G. Delogu, and G. Fadda. 1998. Enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus sequences as molecular targets for typing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:128-132[Abstract/Free Full Text].
16. Stonebrink, B. 1958. The use of a pyruvate containing egg medium in the culture of isoniazid resistant strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis var. Hominis. Acta Tuberc. Scand. 35:67-80.
17. Szewzyk, R., S. B. Svenson, S. E. Hoffner, G. Bölske, H. Wahlström, L. Englund, A. Engvall, and G. Källenius. 1995. Molecular epidemiological studies of Mycobacterium bovis infections in humans and animals in Sweden. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:3183-3185[Abstract].
18. Telenti, A., F. Marchesi, M. Balz, F. Bally, E. C. Böttger, and T. Bodmer. 1993. Rapid identification of mycobacteria to the species level by polymerase chain reaction and restriction enzyme analysis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 31:175-178[Abstract/Free Full Text].
19. Whipple, D. L., P. R. Clarke, J. L. Jaragin, and J. B. Payeur. 1997. Restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of Mycobacterium bovis isolates from captive and free-ranging animals. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. 9:381-386[Abstract/Free Full Text].
20. Wilson, S. M., S. Goss, and F. Drobniewski. 1998. Evaluation of strategies for molecular fingerprinting for use in the routine work of a mycobacterium reference unit. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:3385-3388[Abstract/Free Full Text].


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, October 2000, p. 3837-3839, Vol. 38, No. 10
0095-1137/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sechi, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Zanetti, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sechi, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Zanetti, S.