Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, December 2000, p. 4402-4407, Vol. 38, No. 12
Animal Health Service, 9200 AJ
Drachten,1 and Department of
Bacteriology, Institute for Animal Science and Health, ID Lelystad,
8200 AB, Lelystad,2 The Netherlands, and
Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences,
Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 148533
Received 11 May 2000/Returned for modification 29 July
2000/Accepted 29 September 2000
In this study test characteristics of three newly developed
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) for Salmonella
enterica subsp. enterica serovar Dublin were
evaluated and compared with two agglutination tests. The ELISAs
involved were an indirect ELISA with serovar Dublin lipopolysaccharide
(LPS ELISA), an indirect ELISA with serovar Dublin flagellar antigen
(GP ELISA), and a double-antibody sandwich blocking ELISA that uses
monoclonal antibodies against S. enterica subsp.
enterica serovar Enteritidis flagellin (GM-DAS ELISA). The
agglutination tests involved were two routine serum agglutination tests
with either somatic (O) or flagellar (H) antigen. Diagnostic
specificity of the three ELISAs was determined using 840 serum samples
from seven dairy herds without any history of serovar Dublin infection.
Cutoff values at a titer of 100, 100, and 10, respectively, for the LPS
ELISA, GP ELISA, and GM-DAS blocking ELISA resulted in a specificity of
99.3, 100, and 100%, respectively. Using these cutoff values the LPS
ELISA, GP ELISA, and GM-DAS ELISA were able to detect, respectively,
30, 46, and 38% of 50 fecal culture-positive animals from 13 herds
with a recent serovar Dublin infection. With the same cutoff values, active carriers (n = 18) were detected for 94.4% with
the LPS ELISA and for 100% with the GP and GM-DAS ELISAs. Kappa values determined on the results of all tests from 8 of the 13 serovar Dublin-infected herds and the 7 control herds demonstrated a good correlation between the results of all ELISAs and the H-agglutination test. The results of the O-agglutination test failed to correlate with
those of the other tests. Using a set of sera from 170 aborting cows
(with 25 abortions due to serovar Dublin), test results of the ELISAs
and the H-agglutination test were comparable. The H-agglutination test
may be used successfully for single sample testing, especially to
diagnose abortion due to serovar Dublin. It is concluded that the
ELISAs are useful diagnostic tools in serovar Dublin control programs
and that they are preferred to agglutination tests for reasons of
automation and costs.
Worldwide, Salmonella
enterica subsp. enterica serovar Dublin causes
infections in cattle, usually with serious clinical disease (19). Control of serovar Dublin on serovar Dublin-infected
farms is difficult, partly due to the ability of Salmonella
to survive in the environment and certainly due to the occurrence of
carrier animals. Detection and subsequent culling of carrier animals is thought to be crucial for control of serovar Dublin in persistently infected herds (7, 10, 13, 15, 16). Active carriers excrete
serovar Dublin for many months or even for their lifetime in feces
and/or milk. They can be detected easily by bacteriological examination. Excretion of serovar Dublin by latent carriers is unpredictable. The use of bacteriological examination for the detection
of these animals is consequently limited (7, 12). Serology
can improve the identification of active and latent carriers, even in
herds with a vaccination program (7, 10). Serological detection of carriers is based on the persistence of antibody titers in
blood or milk. However, there are also limitations for using serology
in detecting carriers and transiently infected animals (6,
11), such as the existence of persistently seronegative carriers
(6) and the inability of young animals to produce antibodies
against lipopolysaccharide (LPS) of serovar Dublin (14, 22).
Moreover, serological tests can differ in sensitivity. It is, for
instance, reported that agglutination tests are less sensitive than
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) (1). Many
serological tests have been described, such as agglutination tests for
serovar Dublin based on somatic (O) or flagellar (H) antigen (13,
21), and ELISAs for serovar Dublin based on LPS antigen (1,
5, 16). Studies of ELISAs for serovar Dublin, based on flagellar
antigen, are not known.
Recently, two ELISAs based on flagellar antigen and one ELISA based on
LPS antigen became available for evaluation in bovines. The aim of this
study was to compare the different ELISAs and two conventional
agglutination tests with each other and with bacteriological
examination in serovar Dublin-infected and control animals.
Study design. (i) Infected and control farms.
The study was
performed on 13 farms with recent history of clinical salmonellosis due
to serovar Dublin. Diagnosis on all farms was confirmed by isolation of
serovar Dublin from one or more different samples of diseased animals.
The period between the onset of clinical symptoms and first sampling
moment of all animals on a farm was shorter than 6 months for 11 of the
13 farms. Clinical symptoms were seen mainly within the group of young
calves. Farms on which animals were infected with serovar Dublin were sampled four times, with intervals of 6 months. One farm was not sampled at the third and fourth sampling moment because of lack of
motivation of the farmer. Each sampling consisted of a blood sample and
a fecal sample of all animals present. The mean number of animals per
farm for the first sampling moment was 135 (ranging from 66 to 389).
The total number of animals on serovar Dublin-infected farms at the
first sampling moment was 1,763. The seven control farms were located
on two isles in the northern region of The Netherlands. The selected
isles had no history of bovine salmonellosis. Control farms were
sampled once. Sampling consisted of a blood sample and a fecal sample
of all animals. The mean number of animals per farm was 120 (ranging
from 96 to 142). The total number of animals present on the control
farms was 840.
0095-1137/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Evaluation of Three Newly Developed Enzyme-Linked
Immunosorbent Assays and Two Agglutination Tests for Detecting
Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica Serovar
Dublin Infections in Dairy Cattle
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
(ii) Carriers. Fecal culture-positive animals were sampled repeatedly in order to identify active carriers. Active carriers were defined as animals with at least three successive serovar Dublin-positive fecal cultures with a sampling interval of at least 14 days, according to the definition of Field (2). Eighteen active carriers were identified. In 13 of these active carriers the period between successive positive fecal cultures was at least 28 days. Nine of the 18 selected carriers had a history of clinical symptoms due to serovar Dublin. Most of the animals had high fever and diarrhea during the infection period (seven animals). Four animals had an abortion with (two animals) or without (two animals) other symptoms. At least five animals were treated because of clinical symptoms. The mean age of the active carriers was about 3 years and 3 months. Five animals were younger than 1 year.
Five fecal culture-positive animals, from two farms, were purchased for more-detailed studies on fecal shedding and serology and for postmortem examination. Two animals from farm A and one animal from farm B were active carriers according to the definition of Field (2). The other two animals from farm B were on two occasions fecal culture-positive for serovar Dublin, with an interval of 7 months, and could not be classified as active carriers. At the farm, these animals were housed in the same group as the active carrier from farm B. After purchase the five fecal culture-positive animals were housed separately from each other to prevent cross-infection. The animals were sampled two times per week for bacteriological examination of feces and milk (if lactating), and once a week for serological monitoring by the three ELISAs. After the study the animals were necropsied.(iii) Aborting cows. Aborted fetuses were collected from material that was sent to the Animal Health Service in Drachten, The Netherlands, for regular diagnostic reasons. Involved farmers were contacted and asked for a blood sample of the aborting cow. In total 170 aborted fetuses with corresponding blood samples of their dams were collected. The farmers were also asked for the salmonellosis history of the herd over the last 2 years. The study was carried out between September 1996 and April 1997.
Bacteriological examination. Fecal samples were examined for the presence of Salmonella by direct inoculation onto brilliant green agar (Oxoid CM 263), using a 10-µl loop, and by inoculation of 10 g of feces into 100 ml of brilliant green selenite broth. After incubation for 18 to 24 h at 37°C, 10 µl of selenite broth was inoculated onto brilliant green agar. Brilliant green agar plates were incubated for 18 to 24 h at 37°C and read for the presence of suspected Salmonella colonies. Subcultures were made and typed by standard biochemical tests and by slide agglutination using specific antisera. Bacteriological examination of aborted fetuses was done by standard bacteriological techniques on abomasal contents, liver, and different organs and, if present, the placenta. A sample was considered positive if at least one of the colonies was identified as serovar Dublin.
ELISAs and agglutination tests. The ELISAs used in this study were the same as or modifications of ELISAs described earlier for poultry (18). Details of the buffers and substrate used, the length of the incubation steps, the conjugation of monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) to horseradish peroxidase (HRPO) are described by van Zijderveld et al. (17). Optimal concentrations of antigens and HRPO conjugates were determined by checkerboard titrations. Appropriate controls were included on each test plate.
(i) Indirect ELISA with LPS from serovar Dublin (LPS ELISA). The wells of microdilution plates were each coated with 100 µl of a solution of serovar Dublin LPS containing 5 µg of LPS per ml. LPS was prepared from serovar Dublin strain ID-Sd2 by the hot water-phenol method of Westphal and Jann as described by Helander (4). Serum samples were added in serial twofold dilutions starting with a dilution of 1:25. After incubation for 1 h at 37°C, plates were washed and the conjugate, an HRPO-labeled MAb against bovine immunoglobulin G1 (ID 15.8.1a), was added. After incubation for 1 h at 37°C, plates were washed and the substrate solution with 5-aminosalicylic acid as chromogen was added, and the plates were read after 2 h at room temperature. Titers were expressed as the reciprocal of the highest dilution or its logarithm, yielding an A450 that was 50% of the absorbance value obtained with the positive control serum.
(ii) Indirect ELISA with purified serovar Dublin flagellin (GP ELISA). This ELISA was essentially the same as the LPS ELISA, except that plates were coated with 100 µl of a solution of purified serovar Dublin flagellin containing 5 µg of flagellin per ml. Highly motile serovar Dublin strain ID-Sd2 was obtained after several passages on heart infusion swarm agar (0.5% agar). The strain was then inoculated into 4-liter quantities of the medium described by Ibrahim et al. (8). After incubation for 12 to 16 h at 37°C, Salmonella cells were harvested, checked for the presence of serovar Dublin flagella, and resuspended in saline solution. The isolation and purification of flagellin were essentially the same as those described by Ibrahim et al. (8). The purity of the flagellin preparation was assessed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis as described before by van Zijderveld et al. (18). Titers were expressed as the reciprocal of the highest dilution or its logarithm, yielding an A450 that was 50% of the absorbance value obtained with the positive control serum.
(iii) GM-DAS ELISA. This ELISA is a double-antibody sandwich blocking ELISA as described before by van Zijderveld et al. (18). Briefly, microdilution plates were coated with MAb gm-5 directed against a g epitope of the serovar Enteritidis flagellin, which is also present on serovar Dublin flagellin. A crude antigen preparation containing native flagella of serovar Enteritidis was added, and after washing serum samples were added in twofold dilutions starting at a dilution of 1:10. After incubation for 1 h at 37°C and washing, an HRPO-conjugated MAb against another g epitope was added. Titers were expressed as the reciprocal of the highest dilution or its logarithm, yielding an A450 that was at least 50% of the absorbance value obtained by the negative control serum.
(iv) Serum agglutination tests. Serum agglutination tests were performed in tubes according to standard procedures. Antigens used were a serovar Dublin somatic (O) antigen and a serovar Dublin flagellar (H) antigen, prepared essentially the same as described in the OIE Manual of Standards (10a). The antigens were washed once, stored as stock suspension at 4°C, and just before use were diluted from the stock suspension to an optical density at 600 nm of approximately 0.425. Serum samples were tested in twofold dilutions starting with a dilution of 1:20. Titers were expressed as the reciprocal of the highest dilution yielding at least 50% agglutination. Positive and negative controls were included in each test run.
Analysis and analytical methods. Data on fecal culture-positive animals at serovar Dublin-infected farms and data on animals at control farms were used to estimate specificity and sensitivity of the tests. Specificity and sensitivity were evaluated at several cutoff values of the ELISAs. Two most appropriate cutoff values were determined for the three ELISAs: a low cutoff value and high cutoff value. Differences in results among the three ELISAs and their combinations were tested using McNemar's chi-square test for paired data (3).
The proportion of positive serum samples was compared between serovar Dublin-infected farms that remained fecal culture positive after the initial serovar Dublin infection (seven farms) and farms without fecal culture-positive animals after the initial infection (five farms), using the three ELISAs and determined cutoff values. Differences were tested using Pearson's chi-square test (3). Data on the 5 serovar Dublin-infected farms that had no fecal culture-positive animals after the initial outbreak, were further used to study the course of titers in initially seropositive animals. An animal was considered initially seropositive in an ELISA when the titer at the first sampling moment was equal to or above the low cutoff value of that ELISA. Data on active carriers were used to estimate test results of the ELISAs in this category of infected animals. Data on control farms and the first sampling moment on eight serovar Dublin-infected farms (915 animals) were used to calculate kappa values in order to determine agreement between ELISAs and agglutination tests (3). Standard cutoff values were used for the routine O- and H-agglutination test: a low cutoff value of 40 and a high cutoff value of 80 for both tests. Data on aborting cows were used to estimate test results of the ELISAs and agglutination tests within these animals. The proportion of positive serum samples was compared between the two groups of sera from aborting cows, using Pearson's chi-square test (3). Specificity was defined as the proportion of serum test-negative samples (below cutoff value) among the fecal culture-negative animals of control farms. Sensitivity was defined as the proportion of serum test-positive samples (equal to or above the cutoff value) among the fecal culture-positive animals where serum and fecal samples were taken at the same point in time (9). An animal was regarded as seropositive if the titer was equal to or above the given cutoff value. An animal was regarded as seronegative if the titer was lower than the given cutoff value. Combinations of tests were evaluated in parallel (any positive test result was regarded as a positive test combination), thereby attempting to increase the number of seropositive animals. Statistical significance was defined at P = 0.05.| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Test characteristics of ELISAs on serovar Dublin-infected and
control farms.
Results of the ELISAs with 840 animals on the seven
control farms are presented in Table 1.
All animals were fecal culture-negative for serovar Dublin at the time
of blood sampling. With a specificity of >99% a low and high cutoff
value was selected per test. The low cutoff values for the LPS ELISA,
GP ELISA, and GM-DAS ELISAs were determined at a titer of 100, 100, and
10, respectively. The high cutoff values for the same ELISAs were
determined at a titer of 200, 200, and 20, respectively.
|
|
Active carriers. The percentage of serovar Dublin seropositive active carriers, using the low cutoff value, was 94.4% for the LPS ELISA and 100% for the GP and GM-DAS ELISAs. Using the high cutoff value, 94.4% of the active carriers tested seropositive in all three ELISAs.
After purchase of the five fecal culture-positive animals the three active carriers remained fecal culture-positive. The other two animals remained serovar Dublin culture negative from 1 week after purchase. Test results of the five animals are shown in Table 3. The three active carriers remained seropositive by all three ELISAs, using the high cutoff values. The other two animals (2205 and 2492) had no serum response in the GM-DAS ELISA and, only in the first month after purchase, a low serum response with the GP and LPS ELISA. After 8 months these two animals were necropsied. Necropsy revealed no abnormalities nor any serovar Dublin-positive culture of gut contents, lymph nodes, and internal organs. The three active carriers were necropsied after 17 months. Necropsy of animal 2201 revealed an extensive pyelonephritis of the left kidney and a serovar Dublin-positive culture of the gut content, mesenteric lymph nodes, and left kidney. Necropsy of the other two active carriers (3858 and 3863) revealed typical liver fluke-infested livers and a serovar Dublin-positive culture of the gut content, mesenteric lymph nodes, portal lymph nodes, liver tissue (10,000 to 100,000 CFU/g) and gallbladder (10,000,000 CFU/ml).
|
Comparison of ELISAs and agglutination tests.
Differences
between ELISAs and agglutination tests were compared by calculating
kappa values (Table 4). Agreement between tests was best for GP ELISA, GM-DAS ELISA, and the H-agglutination test. There was a poor agreement between the O-agglutination test and
the other tests.
|
Aborting cows.
Test results for sera of 170 aborting cows were
compared with results of bacteriological examination of involved
aborted fetuses. In 25 cases serovar Dublin could be isolated. In 11 of
these cases there was a known history of salmonellosis on the farm.
From 145 aborted fetuses serovar Dublin could not be isolated by
bacteriological examination. For 55 of these cases there was a known
history of salmonellosis of the farm. The percentage of seropositive
animals for serovar Dublin, using different tests, is shown in Table
5. The percentage of seropositive animals
by the O-agglutination test was substantially lower among the cows that
aborted due to serovar Dublin, using the high cutoff value
(P < 0.01). The sensitivity of the combination of
H-agglutination test and GP ELISA was 9.5% higher (95% confidence
interval [CI], 0 to 23.2%) and the specificity was 9.4% lower (95%
CI, 4.5 to 14.4%) than the sensitivity and specificity of the
H-agglutination test alone, using the low cutoff values. Using the high
cutoff values and the same combination of tests, sensitivity was 4.8%
higher (95% CI, 0 to 14.7%) and specificity was 2.2% lower (95% CI,
0 to 4.6%). There was no further positive effect on test
characteristics by other combinations of tests or by using more than
two test combinations. Limited data indicated a further improvement of
sensitivity if blood was sampled more than 4 days after abortion (data
not shown).
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this study test characteristics of three ELISAs were evaluated in comparison with the results of bacteriological examination of individual animals. The sensitivity of the ELISAs was low in detecting animals with a positive fecal culture for serovar Dublin, except for the active carriers. There can be several explanations for this low sensitivity. First, not all animals may have a humoral immune response after a serovar Dublin infection (20). Second, the time interval between infection and blood sampling was probably too short for some animals to result in a measurable immune response. Third, young calves may not be capable of producing or may have a delayed response in producing antibodies against LPS antigen. This age-related response was seen for very young calves after experimental infections (F. G. van Zijderveld, unpublished observation) and with calves up to 3 months after immunization with killed Salmonella bacterin (14, 22). This argument is especially important for the LPS ELISA and O-agglutination test. Furthermore, in our study most clinical symptoms on the serovar Dublin-infected farms were seen among young calves.
On the infected farms, the serum response for serovar Dublin was low
based on the results of the ELISAs. This may be partly explained by the
moment of first blood sampling. The first moment of sampling for most
farms was about 4 to 6 months after the initial infection of the herd,
and there may have been a substantial decrease in antibody titer for
transiently infected animals in a period of 6 months (Fig.
1). The definition of active carrier is
important for the evaluation of the ELISAs in detecting these animals
and probably also for the detection of latent carriers. The sensitivity of the three ELISAs for detection of active carriers, according to the
definition of Field (2), was promising. Using the low cutoff
value, 94.4% of the active carriers were detected by the LPS ELISA and
100% of the active carriers were detected by the GP and GM-DAS ELISAs.
The three active carriers from the detailed study could also be
detected using higher cutoff values for the ELISAs. It is not known
from this study if the test results with the active carriers of serovar
Dublin can be extrapolated to the serology of latent carriers of
serovar Dublin. The detailed study with the five culture-positive
animals clearly shows the difference between active and passive
carriers as earlier mentioned by Field (2) and Richardson
(12). Two animals stopped shedding serovar Dublin after they
were housed separately from the active carrier. Necropsy of these
animals revealed no abnormalities nor any serovar Dublin-positive
culture. These animals can be classified as passive carriers during the
time they were housed together with the active carrier (12).
|
The course of mean titers on serovar Dublin-infected farms without active carriers (Fig. 1) revealed a period of about 1.5 years before most of the serum responses were below the low cutoff value of the tests. This is important for the detection of persistent seropositive animals. It is concluded, in contrast with other observations (16), that a period of 2 or 3 months between two sampling moments is probably to short to discriminate between carriers and transient infected animals.
The specificity of the agglutination tests on sera of aborting cows was higher than that for the ELISAs (Table 5). A reason might be the occurrence of "incomplete" (nonagglutinating) antibodies in formerly infected animals, because sera of the aborted cows were mainly received from regions where serovar Dublin infections are endemic. Sensitivity of the H-agglutination test was higher than the sensitivity of the O-agglutination test in the sera of the aborting cows. This is in agreement with other work on diagnosis of serovar Dublin, using vaccinated animals (21) or carrier cows (12). The lower test results of the O-agglutination test on serovar Dublin-infected farms, also according to the lower kappa values (Table 4), is probably due to the inability of young animals to form antibodies against LPS (14, 22).
Estimation of the costs of the tests was not part of this study, but for reasons of automation ELISAs are favorable for testing large numbers of sera. With individual samples agglutination tests are cheaper than ELISAs.
It is concluded that test characteristics of the three ELISAs are comparable in detecting animals which are fecal culture positive for serovar Dublin and in detecting active carriers. ELISAs based on flagellar antigen are preferred for estimation of the seroprevalence. Test characteristics of ELISAs and agglutination tests are comparable except for the O-agglutination test. Agglutination tests gave fewer false-positive results with blood samples of aborting cows. The H-agglutination test may be used successfully for single-sample testing, especially to diagnose abortion due to serovar Dublin. ELISAs are more suitable for use on a large scale than agglutination tests, for reasons of automation and costs.
Test characteristics in this study were primarily based on results with individual animals, which were not in the acute phase of the serovar Dublin infection. Further research is therefore needed concerning the characteristics of the ELISAs on a herd level and the diagnostic possibilities of the ELISAs in the acute phase of the infection.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENT |
|---|
This work was supported by the Ministry of Agriculture, Nature Management, and Fisheries, grant KWA/DS/07/94/0050.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Animal Health Service, P.O. Box 361, 9200 AJ Drachten, The Netherlands. Phone: 31-512 570727. Fax: 31-512 520013. E-mail: j.veling{at}gdvdieren.nl.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Carlsson, H. E.,
A. A. Lindberg, and S. Hammarstom.
1972.
Titration of antibodies to Salmonella O antigens by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
Infect. Immun.
6:703-708 |
| 2. | Field, H. I. 1948. A survey of bovine salmonellosis in mid and west Wales. Vet. J. 104:251-266. |
| 3. | Fleiss, J. L. 1981. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. John Wiley & Sons, New York, N.Y. |
| 4. | Helander, I. M. 1985. Isolation and electrophoretic analysis of bacterial lipopolysaccharides, p. 263-274. In T. K. Korhonen, E. A. Dawes, and P. H. Mäkelä (ed.), Enterobacterial surface antigens: methods for molecular characterization. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. |
| 5. | Hoorfar, J., N. C. Feld, A. L. Schirmer, V. Bitsch, and P. Lind. 1994. Serodiagnosis of Salmonella dublin infection in Danish dairy herds using O-antigen based ELISA. Can. J. Vet. Res. 58:268-274[Medline]. |
| 6. | Hoorfar, J., A. Wedderkopp, and P. Lind. 1996. Comparison between persisting anti-lipopolysacharide antibodies and culture at postmortem in Salmonella-infected cattle herds. Vet. Microbiol. 50:81-94[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 7. | House, J. K., B. P. Smith, G. W. Dilling, and L. D. Roden. 1993. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for serologic detection of Salmonella dublin carriers on a large dairy. Am. J. Vet. Res. 54:1391-1399[Medline]. |
| 8. |
Ibrahim, G. F.,
G. F. Fleet,
M. J. Lyons, and R. A. Walker.
1985.
Methods for the isolation of highly purified Salmonella flagellins.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
22:1040-1044 |
| 9. | Martin, S. W., A. H. Meek, and P. Willeberg. 1987. Veterinary epidemiology: principles and methods. Iowa State University Press, Ames. |
| 10. | Nielsen, B. B., and E. M. Vestergaard. 1992. Use of ELISA in the eradication of Salmonella dublin infection, p. 220-224. In Proceedings. International symposium Salmonella and salmonellosis. Zoopôle, Ploufragan, France. |
| 10a. | Office International des Epizooties. 1996. OIE manual of standards for diagnostic tests and vaccines. Office International des Epizooties, Paris, France. |
| 11. | Richardson, A. 1973. Serological responses of Salmonella dublin carrier cows. Br. Vet. J. 129:liii-liv[Medline]. |
| 12. | Richardson, A. R. 1973. The transmission of Salmonella dublin to calves from adult carrier cows. Vet. Rec. 92:112-115[Medline]. |
| 13. | Robertsson, J. A. 1984. Humoral antibody responses to experimental and spontaneous Salmonella infections in cattle measured by ELISA. Zentbl. Vet. Med. 31:367-380. |
| 14. | Roden, D. L., B. P. Smith, S. J. Spier, and G. W. Dilling. 1992. Effect of calf age and Salmonella bacterin type on ability to produce immunoglobulins directed against Salmonella whole cells or lipopolysaccharide. Am. J. Vet. Res. 53:1895-1899[Medline]. |
| 15. | Smith, B. P., D. G. Oliver, P. Singh, G. Dilling, P. A. Marvin, B. P. Ram, L. S. Jang, N. Sharkov, J. S. Orsborn, and K. Jackett. 1993. Detection of Salmonella dublin mammary gland infection in carrier cows, using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for antibody in milk or serum. Am. J. Vet. Res. 50:1352-1360. |
| 16. | Spier, S. J., B. P. Smith, J. W. Cullor, J. S. Dilling, and L. D. Pfaff. 1990. Use of Elisa for detection of immunoglobulins G and M that recognize Salmonella dublin lipopolysaccharide for prediction of carrier status in cattle. Am. J. Vet. Res. 51:1900-1904[Medline]. |
| 17. |
van Zijderveld, F. G.,
F. Westenbrink,
J. Anakotta,
R. A. M. Brouwers, and A. M. van Zijderveld.
1989.
Characterization of the F41 fimbrial antigen of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli by using monoclonal antibodies.
Infect. Immun.
57:1192-1199 |
| 18. |
van Zijderveld, F. G.,
A. M. van Zijderveld-van Bemmel, and J. Anakotta.
1992.
Comparison of four different enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for serological diagnosis of Salmonella enteritidis infection in experimentally infected chickens.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
30:2560-2566 |
| 19. | Visser, I. J. R., M. Veen, and J. W. B van der Giesen. 1992. Salmonella dublin infections in dairy cattle, a review. Tijdschr. Diergeneeskd. 117:730-735[Medline]. |
| 20. | World Health Organization. 1988. Salmonellosis control: the role of animal and product hygiene. WHO technical report series no. 774. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. |
| 21. | Wray, C., J. A. Morris, and W. J. Sojka. 1975. A comparison of indirect haemagglutination tests and serum agglutination tests for the serological diagnosis of Salmonella dublin infection in cattle. Br. Vet. J. 131:727-737[Medline]. |
| 22. |
Wray, C., and W. J. Sojka.
1984.
The serological responses of calves to live Salmonella dublin vaccine a comparison of different serological tests.
J. Biol. Stand.
12:277-282[CrossRef][Medline].
|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»