Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, December 2000, p. 4402-4407, Vol. 38, No. 12
0095-1137/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Evaluation of Three Newly Developed Enzyme-Linked
Immunosorbent Assays and Two Agglutination Tests for Detecting
Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica Serovar
Dublin Infections in Dairy Cattle
J.
Veling,1,*
F. G.
van Zijderveld,2
A. M.
van Zijderveld-van
Bemmel,2
H. W.
Barkema,1 and
Y.
H.
Schukken3
Animal Health Service, 9200 AJ
Drachten,1 and Department of
Bacteriology, Institute for Animal Science and Health, ID Lelystad,
8200 AB, Lelystad,2 The Netherlands, and
Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences,
Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 148533
Received 11 May 2000/Returned for modification 29 July
2000/Accepted 29 September 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
In this study test characteristics of three newly developed
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) for Salmonella
enterica subsp. enterica serovar Dublin were
evaluated and compared with two agglutination tests. The ELISAs
involved were an indirect ELISA with serovar Dublin lipopolysaccharide
(LPS ELISA), an indirect ELISA with serovar Dublin flagellar antigen
(GP ELISA), and a double-antibody sandwich blocking ELISA that uses
monoclonal antibodies against S. enterica subsp.
enterica serovar Enteritidis flagellin (GM-DAS ELISA). The
agglutination tests involved were two routine serum agglutination tests
with either somatic (O) or flagellar (H) antigen. Diagnostic
specificity of the three ELISAs was determined using 840 serum samples
from seven dairy herds without any history of serovar Dublin infection.
Cutoff values at a titer of 100, 100, and 10, respectively, for the LPS
ELISA, GP ELISA, and GM-DAS blocking ELISA resulted in a specificity of
99.3, 100, and 100%, respectively. Using these cutoff values the LPS
ELISA, GP ELISA, and GM-DAS ELISA were able to detect, respectively,
30, 46, and 38% of 50 fecal culture-positive animals from 13 herds
with a recent serovar Dublin infection. With the same cutoff values, active carriers (n = 18) were detected for 94.4% with
the LPS ELISA and for 100% with the GP and GM-DAS ELISAs. Kappa values determined on the results of all tests from 8 of the 13 serovar Dublin-infected herds and the 7 control herds demonstrated a good correlation between the results of all ELISAs and the H-agglutination test. The results of the O-agglutination test failed to correlate with
those of the other tests. Using a set of sera from 170 aborting cows
(with 25 abortions due to serovar Dublin), test results of the ELISAs
and the H-agglutination test were comparable. The H-agglutination test
may be used successfully for single sample testing, especially to
diagnose abortion due to serovar Dublin. It is concluded that the
ELISAs are useful diagnostic tools in serovar Dublin control programs
and that they are preferred to agglutination tests for reasons of
automation and costs.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Worldwide, Salmonella
enterica subsp. enterica serovar Dublin causes
infections in cattle, usually with serious clinical disease (19). Control of serovar Dublin on serovar Dublin-infected
farms is difficult, partly due to the ability of Salmonella
to survive in the environment and certainly due to the occurrence of
carrier animals. Detection and subsequent culling of carrier animals is thought to be crucial for control of serovar Dublin in persistently infected herds (7, 10, 13, 15, 16). Active carriers excrete
serovar Dublin for many months or even for their lifetime in feces
and/or milk. They can be detected easily by bacteriological examination. Excretion of serovar Dublin by latent carriers is unpredictable. The use of bacteriological examination for the detection
of these animals is consequently limited (7, 12). Serology
can improve the identification of active and latent carriers, even in
herds with a vaccination program (7, 10). Serological detection of carriers is based on the persistence of antibody titers in
blood or milk. However, there are also limitations for using serology
in detecting carriers and transiently infected animals (6,
11), such as the existence of persistently seronegative carriers
(6) and the inability of young animals to produce antibodies
against lipopolysaccharide (LPS) of serovar Dublin (14, 22).
Moreover, serological tests can differ in sensitivity. It is, for
instance, reported that agglutination tests are less sensitive than
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) (1). Many
serological tests have been described, such as agglutination tests for
serovar Dublin based on somatic (O) or flagellar (H) antigen (13,
21), and ELISAs for serovar Dublin based on LPS antigen (1,
5, 16). Studies of ELISAs for serovar Dublin, based on flagellar
antigen, are not known.
Recently, two ELISAs based on flagellar antigen and one ELISA based on
LPS antigen became available for evaluation in bovines. The aim of this
study was to compare the different ELISAs and two conventional
agglutination tests with each other and with bacteriological
examination in serovar Dublin-infected and control animals.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Study design. (i) Infected and control farms.
The study was
performed on 13 farms with recent history of clinical salmonellosis due
to serovar Dublin. Diagnosis on all farms was confirmed by isolation of
serovar Dublin from one or more different samples of diseased animals.
The period between the onset of clinical symptoms and first sampling
moment of all animals on a farm was shorter than 6 months for 11 of the
13 farms. Clinical symptoms were seen mainly within the group of young
calves. Farms on which animals were infected with serovar Dublin were sampled four times, with intervals of 6 months. One farm was not sampled at the third and fourth sampling moment because of lack of
motivation of the farmer. Each sampling consisted of a blood sample and
a fecal sample of all animals present. The mean number of animals per
farm for the first sampling moment was 135 (ranging from 66 to 389).
The total number of animals on serovar Dublin-infected farms at the
first sampling moment was 1,763. The seven control farms were located
on two isles in the northern region of The Netherlands. The selected
isles had no history of bovine salmonellosis. Control farms were
sampled once. Sampling consisted of a blood sample and a fecal sample
of all animals. The mean number of animals per farm was 120 (ranging
from 96 to 142). The total number of animals present on the control
farms was 840.
The study on serovar Dublin-infected and control farms was carried out
between September 1994 and September 1996.
(ii) Carriers.
Fecal culture-positive animals were sampled
repeatedly in order to identify active carriers. Active carriers were
defined as animals with at least three successive serovar
Dublin-positive fecal cultures with a sampling interval of at least 14 days, according to the definition of Field (2). Eighteen
active carriers were identified. In 13 of these active carriers the
period between successive positive fecal cultures was at least 28 days.
Nine of the 18 selected carriers had a history of clinical symptoms due
to serovar Dublin. Most of the animals had high fever and diarrhea
during the infection period (seven animals). Four animals had an
abortion with (two animals) or without (two animals) other symptoms. At
least five animals were treated because of clinical symptoms. The mean
age of the active carriers was about 3 years and 3 months. Five animals
were younger than 1 year.
Five fecal culture-positive animals, from two farms, were purchased for
more-detailed studies on fecal shedding and serology and for postmortem
examination. Two animals from farm A and one animal from farm B were
active carriers according to the definition of Field (2).
The other two animals from farm B were on two occasions fecal
culture-positive for serovar Dublin, with an interval of 7 months, and
could not be classified as active carriers. At the farm, these animals
were housed in the same group as the active carrier from farm B. After
purchase the five fecal culture-positive animals were housed separately
from each other to prevent cross-infection. The animals were sampled
two times per week for bacteriological examination of feces and milk
(if lactating), and once a week for serological monitoring by the three
ELISAs. After the study the animals were necropsied.
(iii) Aborting cows.
Aborted fetuses were collected from
material that was sent to the Animal Health Service in Drachten, The
Netherlands, for regular diagnostic reasons. Involved farmers were
contacted and asked for a blood sample of the aborting cow. In total
170 aborted fetuses with corresponding blood samples of their dams were
collected. The farmers were also asked for the salmonellosis history of
the herd over the last 2 years. The study was carried out between September 1996 and April 1997.
Bacteriological examination.
Fecal samples were examined for
the presence of Salmonella by direct inoculation onto
brilliant green agar (Oxoid CM 263), using a 10-µl loop, and by
inoculation of 10 g of feces into 100 ml of brilliant green
selenite broth. After incubation for 18 to 24 h at 37°C, 10 µl
of selenite broth was inoculated onto brilliant green agar. Brilliant
green agar plates were incubated for 18 to 24 h at 37°C and read
for the presence of suspected Salmonella colonies.
Subcultures were made and typed by standard biochemical tests and by
slide agglutination using specific antisera. Bacteriological examination of aborted fetuses was done by standard bacteriological techniques on abomasal contents, liver, and different organs and, if
present, the placenta. A sample was considered positive if at least one
of the colonies was identified as serovar Dublin.
ELISAs and agglutination tests.
The ELISAs used in this
study were the same as or modifications of ELISAs described earlier for
poultry (18). Details of the buffers and substrate used, the
length of the incubation steps, the conjugation of monoclonal
antibodies (MAbs) to horseradish peroxidase (HRPO) are described by van
Zijderveld et al. (17). Optimal concentrations of antigens
and HRPO conjugates were determined by checkerboard titrations.
Appropriate controls were included on each test plate.
(i) Indirect ELISA with LPS from serovar Dublin (LPS ELISA).
The wells of microdilution plates were each coated with 100 µl of a
solution of serovar Dublin LPS containing 5 µg of LPS per ml. LPS was
prepared from serovar Dublin strain ID-Sd2 by the hot water-phenol
method of Westphal and Jann as described by Helander (4).
Serum samples were added in serial twofold dilutions starting with a
dilution of 1:25. After incubation for 1 h at 37°C, plates were
washed and the conjugate, an HRPO-labeled MAb against bovine
immunoglobulin G1 (ID 15.8.1a), was added. After incubation for 1 h at 37°C, plates were washed and the substrate solution with
5-aminosalicylic acid as chromogen was added, and the plates were read
after 2 h at room temperature. Titers were expressed as the
reciprocal of the highest dilution or its logarithm, yielding an
A450 that was 50% of the absorbance value
obtained with the positive control serum.
(ii) Indirect ELISA with purified serovar Dublin flagellin (GP
ELISA).
This ELISA was essentially the same as the LPS ELISA,
except that plates were coated with 100 µl of a solution of purified serovar Dublin flagellin containing 5 µg of flagellin per ml. Highly
motile serovar Dublin strain ID-Sd2 was obtained after several passages
on heart infusion swarm agar (0.5% agar). The strain was then
inoculated into 4-liter quantities of the medium described by Ibrahim
et al. (8). After incubation for 12 to 16 h at 37°C,
Salmonella cells were harvested, checked for the presence of
serovar Dublin flagella, and resuspended in saline solution. The
isolation and purification of flagellin were essentially the same as
those described by Ibrahim et al. (8). The purity of the
flagellin preparation was assessed by sodium dodecyl
sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis as described before by van
Zijderveld et al. (18). Titers were expressed as the
reciprocal of the highest dilution or its logarithm, yielding an
A450 that was 50% of the absorbance value
obtained with the positive control serum.
(iii) GM-DAS ELISA.
This ELISA is a double-antibody sandwich
blocking ELISA as described before by van Zijderveld et al.
(18). Briefly, microdilution plates were coated with MAb
gm-5 directed against a g epitope of the serovar Enteritidis flagellin,
which is also present on serovar Dublin flagellin. A crude antigen
preparation containing native flagella of serovar Enteritidis was
added, and after washing serum samples were added in twofold dilutions
starting at a dilution of 1:10. After incubation for 1 h at 37°C
and washing, an HRPO-conjugated MAb against another g epitope was
added. Titers were expressed as the reciprocal of the highest dilution
or its logarithm, yielding an A450 that was at
least 50% of the absorbance value obtained by the negative control serum.
(iv) Serum agglutination tests.
Serum agglutination tests
were performed in tubes according to standard procedures. Antigens used
were a serovar Dublin somatic (O) antigen and a serovar Dublin
flagellar (H) antigen, prepared essentially the same as described in
the OIE Manual of Standards (10a). The antigens were washed
once, stored as stock suspension at 4°C, and just before use were
diluted from the stock suspension to an optical density at 600 nm of
approximately 0.425. Serum samples were tested in twofold dilutions
starting with a dilution of 1:20. Titers were expressed as the
reciprocal of the highest dilution yielding at least 50%
agglutination. Positive and negative controls were included in each
test run.
Analysis and analytical methods.
Data on fecal
culture-positive animals at serovar Dublin-infected farms and data on
animals at control farms were used to estimate specificity and
sensitivity of the tests. Specificity and sensitivity were evaluated at
several cutoff values of the ELISAs. Two most appropriate cutoff values
were determined for the three ELISAs: a low cutoff value and high
cutoff value. Differences in results among the three ELISAs and their
combinations were tested using McNemar's chi-square test for paired
data (3).
The proportion of positive serum samples was compared between serovar
Dublin-infected farms that remained fecal culture positive after the
initial serovar Dublin infection (seven farms) and farms without fecal
culture-positive animals after the initial infection (five farms),
using the three ELISAs and determined cutoff values. Differences were
tested using Pearson's chi-square test (3). Data on the 5 serovar Dublin-infected farms that had no fecal culture-positive
animals after the initial outbreak, were further used to study the
course of titers in initially seropositive animals. An animal was
considered initially seropositive in an ELISA when the titer at the
first sampling moment was equal to or above the low cutoff value of
that ELISA.
Data on active carriers were used to estimate test results of the
ELISAs in this category of infected animals.
Data on control farms and the first sampling moment on eight serovar
Dublin-infected farms (915 animals) were used to calculate kappa values
in order to determine agreement between ELISAs and agglutination tests
(3). Standard cutoff values were used for the routine O- and
H-agglutination test: a low cutoff value of 40 and a high cutoff value
of 80 for both tests.
Data on aborting cows were used to estimate test results of the ELISAs
and agglutination tests within these animals. The proportion of
positive serum samples was compared between the two groups of sera from
aborting cows, using Pearson's chi-square test (3).
Specificity was defined as the proportion of serum test-negative
samples (below cutoff value) among the fecal culture-negative animals
of control farms. Sensitivity was defined as the proportion of serum
test-positive samples (equal to or above the cutoff value) among the
fecal culture-positive animals where serum and fecal samples were taken
at the same point in time (9). An animal was regarded as
seropositive if the titer was equal to or above the given cutoff value.
An animal was regarded as seronegative if the titer was lower than the
given cutoff value. Combinations of tests were evaluated in parallel
(any positive test result was regarded as a positive test combination),
thereby attempting to increase the number of seropositive animals.
Statistical significance was defined at P = 0.05.
 |
RESULTS |
Test characteristics of ELISAs on serovar Dublin-infected and
control farms.
Results of the ELISAs with 840 animals on the seven
control farms are presented in Table 1.
All animals were fecal culture-negative for serovar Dublin at the time
of blood sampling. With a specificity of >99% a low and high cutoff
value was selected per test. The low cutoff values for the LPS ELISA,
GP ELISA, and GM-DAS ELISAs were determined at a titer of 100, 100, and
10, respectively. The high cutoff values for the same ELISAs were
determined at a titer of 200, 200, and 20, respectively.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1.
Evaluation of sensitivity and specificity of three ELISAs
on animals at 13 serovar Dublin-infected and 8 control dairy farms
|
|
The percentage of seropositive animals, for two groups of animals on 13 serovar Dublin-infected farms, is given in Table 1. At time of first
sampling and with the low cutoff value, the percentage of seropositive
animals for the LPS, GP, and GM-DAS ELISA was 8.2, 9.9, and 7.9, respectively. Calves tested negative up to 2 months of age, using the
high cutoff value of the LPS ELISA. The seroprevalence determined with
the high cutoff value of the GP and GM-DAS ELISA for these calves was
11.9 and 13.6%, respectively. At the four successive sampling moments,
seven, five, three, and two farms had at least one serovar Dublin
culture-positive animal, respectively. The interval between successive
sampling moments was 6 months. The total number of fecal
culture-positive animals for serovar Dublin was, for the successive
sampling moments, 38, 21, 4, and 2 animals, respectively. Eight
culture-positive animals on three farms were culled at the initiative
of the farmer. Five of these animals could be classified as active
carriers. In total 50 animals were found fecal culture positive for
serovar Dublin at one or more sampling moments. Using the low cutoff
value, determined on the control farms, the percentage of seropositive
animals among the 50 serovar Dublin culture-positive animals by the
LPS, GP, and GM-DAS ELISA was 32.0, 46.0, and 38.0, respectively. The
percentage of seropositive animals by the LPS ELISA was lower than that
by the GP ELISA (P < 0.01). Combining the GP ELISA and
LPS ELISA, using the low cutoff values, did not increase the percentage
of seropositive animals (P = 1.00); neither did a
combination of the GP and GM-DAS ELISAs (P = 0.84).
The percentage of seropositive animals, at successive sampling moments
for 12 serovar Dublin-infected farms, is given in Table 2, comparing seven farms that remained
fecal culture positive after the initial serovar Dublin infection with
five farms without any fecal culture-positive animal after the initial
infection. There was little difference in percentage seropositive
animals between the two groups of farms at the second and third
sampling moment. However, at the fourth sampling moment, a clear
difference was found. The greatest differences between the two groups
of farms were found using the LPS ELISA or GP ELISA.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 2.
Percentage of seropositive animals at successive sampling
moments with 6-month intervals on 12 serovar Dublin-infected
farms
|
|
The results of the course of mean titers are shown in Fig. 1. There was
a mean decrease of about one log10 of the titer in the
period between two sampling moments (6 months). The percentage animals
with a decline between the first and second sampling moment of less
than one log10 of the titer, was 80, 78, and 73 for the LPS, GP, and GM-DAS ELISA, respectively. Differences in course of mean
titers between ELISAs were small.
Active carriers.
The percentage of serovar Dublin seropositive
active carriers, using the low cutoff value, was 94.4% for the LPS
ELISA and 100% for the GP and GM-DAS ELISAs. Using the high cutoff
value, 94.4% of the active carriers tested seropositive in all three ELISAs.
After purchase of the five fecal culture-positive animals the three
active carriers remained fecal culture-positive. The other two animals
remained serovar Dublin culture negative from 1 week after purchase.
Test results of the five animals are shown in Table
3. The three active carriers remained
seropositive by all three ELISAs, using the high cutoff values. The
other two animals (2205 and 2492) had no serum response in the GM-DAS
ELISA and, only in the first month after purchase, a low serum response
with the GP and LPS ELISA. After 8 months these two animals were
necropsied. Necropsy revealed no abnormalities nor any serovar
Dublin-positive culture of gut contents, lymph nodes, and internal
organs. The three active carriers were necropsied after 17 months.
Necropsy of animal 2201 revealed an extensive pyelonephritis of the
left kidney and a serovar Dublin-positive culture of the gut content, mesenteric lymph nodes, and left kidney. Necropsy of the other two
active carriers (3858 and 3863) revealed typical liver fluke-infested livers and a serovar Dublin-positive culture of the gut content, mesenteric lymph nodes, portal lymph nodes, liver tissue (10,000 to
100,000 CFU/g) and gallbladder (10,000,000 CFU/ml).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 3.
Test results with sera and feces of three active and two
passive carriers of serovar Dublin after they were housed individually
|
|
Comparison of ELISAs and agglutination tests.
Differences
between ELISAs and agglutination tests were compared by calculating
kappa values (Table 4). Agreement between tests was best for GP ELISA, GM-DAS ELISA, and the H-agglutination test. There was a poor agreement between the O-agglutination test and
the other tests.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 4.
Comparison between three ELISAs and two agglutination
tests for serovar Dublin detection using eight serovar
Dublin-infected farms and seven control farms
|
|
Aborting cows.
Test results for sera of 170 aborting cows were
compared with results of bacteriological examination of involved
aborted fetuses. In 25 cases serovar Dublin could be isolated. In 11 of
these cases there was a known history of salmonellosis on the farm.
From 145 aborted fetuses serovar Dublin could not be isolated by
bacteriological examination. For 55 of these cases there was a known
history of salmonellosis of the farm. The percentage of seropositive
animals for serovar Dublin, using different tests, is shown in Table
5. The percentage of seropositive animals
by the O-agglutination test was substantially lower among the cows that
aborted due to serovar Dublin, using the high cutoff value
(P < 0.01). The sensitivity of the combination of
H-agglutination test and GP ELISA was 9.5% higher (95% confidence
interval [CI], 0 to 23.2%) and the specificity was 9.4% lower (95%
CI, 4.5 to 14.4%) than the sensitivity and specificity of the
H-agglutination test alone, using the low cutoff values. Using the high
cutoff values and the same combination of tests, sensitivity was 4.8%
higher (95% CI, 0 to 14.7%) and specificity was 2.2% lower (95% CI,
0 to 4.6%). There was no further positive effect on test
characteristics by other combinations of tests or by using more than
two test combinations. Limited data indicated a further improvement of
sensitivity if blood was sampled more than 4 days after abortion (data
not shown).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 5.
Percentage of animals seropositive for serovar Dublin
among 170 aborting cows, using various tests and cutoff values
|
|
The percentage of seropositive animals, among cows that aborted for
reasons other than serovar Dublin, was higher by the ELISAs than by the
agglutination tests (P < 0.05).
 |
DISCUSSION |
In this study test characteristics of three ELISAs were evaluated
in comparison with the results of bacteriological examination of
individual animals. The sensitivity of the ELISAs was low in detecting
animals with a positive fecal culture for serovar Dublin, except for
the active carriers. There can be several explanations for this low
sensitivity. First, not all animals may have a humoral immune response
after a serovar Dublin infection (20). Second, the time
interval between infection and blood sampling was probably too short
for some animals to result in a measurable immune response. Third,
young calves may not be capable of producing or may have a delayed
response in producing antibodies against LPS antigen. This age-related
response was seen for very young calves after experimental infections
(F. G. van Zijderveld, unpublished observation) and with calves up
to 3 months after immunization with killed Salmonella
bacterin (14, 22). This argument is especially important for
the LPS ELISA and O-agglutination test. Furthermore, in our study most
clinical symptoms on the serovar Dublin-infected farms were seen among
young calves.
On the infected farms, the serum response for serovar Dublin was low
based on the results of the ELISAs. This may be partly explained by the
moment of first blood sampling. The first moment of sampling for most
farms was about 4 to 6 months after the initial infection of the herd,
and there may have been a substantial decrease in antibody titer for
transiently infected animals in a period of 6 months (Fig.
1). The definition of active carrier is
important for the evaluation of the ELISAs in detecting these animals
and probably also for the detection of latent carriers. The sensitivity of the three ELISAs for detection of active carriers, according to the
definition of Field (2), was promising. Using the low cutoff
value, 94.4% of the active carriers were detected by the LPS ELISA and
100% of the active carriers were detected by the GP and GM-DAS ELISAs.
The three active carriers from the detailed study could also be
detected using higher cutoff values for the ELISAs. It is not known
from this study if the test results with the active carriers of serovar
Dublin can be extrapolated to the serology of latent carriers of
serovar Dublin. The detailed study with the five culture-positive
animals clearly shows the difference between active and passive
carriers as earlier mentioned by Field (2) and Richardson
(12). Two animals stopped shedding serovar Dublin after they
were housed separately from the active carrier. Necropsy of these
animals revealed no abnormalities nor any serovar Dublin-positive
culture. These animals can be classified as passive carriers during the
time they were housed together with the active carrier (12).

View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Course of mean titer of the LPS ( ), GP ( ), and
GM-DAS ( ) ELISA in initially seropositive animals (n = 74) on five serovar Dublin-infected farms without any positive
fecal culture at four sampling moments (6-month intervals).
|
|
The course of mean titers on serovar Dublin-infected farms without
active carriers (Fig. 1) revealed a period of about 1.5 years before
most of the serum responses were below the low cutoff value of the
tests. This is important for the detection of persistent seropositive
animals. It is concluded, in contrast with other observations
(16), that a period of 2 or 3 months between two sampling
moments is probably to short to discriminate between carriers and
transient infected animals.
The specificity of the agglutination tests on sera of aborting cows was
higher than that for the ELISAs (Table 5). A reason might be the
occurrence of "incomplete" (nonagglutinating) antibodies in
formerly infected animals, because sera of the aborted cows were mainly
received from regions where serovar Dublin infections are endemic.
Sensitivity of the H-agglutination test was higher than the sensitivity
of the O-agglutination test in the sera of the aborting cows. This is
in agreement with other work on diagnosis of serovar Dublin, using
vaccinated animals (21) or carrier cows (12). The
lower test results of the O-agglutination test on serovar
Dublin-infected farms, also according to the lower kappa values (Table
4), is probably due to the inability of young animals to form
antibodies against LPS (14, 22).
Estimation of the costs of the tests was not part of this study, but
for reasons of automation ELISAs are favorable for testing large
numbers of sera. With individual samples agglutination tests are
cheaper than ELISAs.
It is concluded that test characteristics of the three ELISAs are
comparable in detecting animals which are fecal culture positive for
serovar Dublin and in detecting active carriers. ELISAs based on
flagellar antigen are preferred for estimation of the seroprevalence.
Test characteristics of ELISAs and agglutination tests are comparable
except for the O-agglutination test. Agglutination tests gave fewer
false-positive results with blood samples of aborting cows. The
H-agglutination test may be used successfully for single-sample
testing, especially to diagnose abortion due to serovar Dublin. ELISAs
are more suitable for use on a large scale than agglutination tests,
for reasons of automation and costs.
Test characteristics in this study were primarily based on results with
individual animals, which were not in the acute phase of the serovar
Dublin infection. Further research is therefore needed concerning the
characteristics of the ELISAs on a herd level and the diagnostic
possibilities of the ELISAs in the acute phase of the infection.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENT |
This work was supported by the Ministry of Agriculture, Nature
Management, and Fisheries, grant KWA/DS/07/94/0050.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Animal Health
Service, P.O. Box 361, 9200 AJ Drachten, The Netherlands. Phone: 31-512 570727. Fax: 31-512 520013. E-mail:
j.veling{at}gdvdieren.nl.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Carlsson, H. E.,
A. A. Lindberg, and S. Hammarstom.
1972.
Titration of antibodies to Salmonella O antigens by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
Infect. Immun.
6:703-708[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Field, H. I.
1948.
A survey of bovine salmonellosis in mid and west Wales.
Vet. J.
104:251-266.
|
| 3.
|
Fleiss, J. L.
1981.
Statistical methods for rates and proportions.
John Wiley & Sons, New York, N.Y.
|
| 4.
|
Helander, I. M.
1985.
Isolation and electrophoretic analysis of bacterial lipopolysaccharides, p. 263-274.
In
T. K. Korhonen, E. A. Dawes, and P. H. Mäkelä (ed.), Enterobacterial surface antigens: methods for molecular characterization. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
|
| 5.
|
Hoorfar, J.,
N. C. Feld,
A. L. Schirmer,
V. Bitsch, and P. Lind.
1994.
Serodiagnosis of Salmonella dublin infection in Danish dairy herds using O-antigen based ELISA.
Can. J. Vet. Res.
58:268-274[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Hoorfar, J.,
A. Wedderkopp, and P. Lind.
1996.
Comparison between persisting anti-lipopolysacharide antibodies and culture at postmortem in Salmonella-infected cattle herds.
Vet. Microbiol.
50:81-94[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 7.
|
House, J. K.,
B. P. Smith,
G. W. Dilling, and L. D. Roden.
1993.
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for serologic detection of Salmonella dublin carriers on a large dairy.
Am. J. Vet. Res.
54:1391-1399[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Ibrahim, G. F.,
G. F. Fleet,
M. J. Lyons, and R. A. Walker.
1985.
Methods for the isolation of highly purified Salmonella flagellins.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
22:1040-1044[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Martin, S. W.,
A. H. Meek, and P. Willeberg.
1987.
Veterinary epidemiology: principles and methods.
Iowa State University Press, Ames.
|
| 10.
|
Nielsen, B. B., and E. M. Vestergaard.
1992.
Use of ELISA in the eradication of Salmonella dublin infection, p. 220-224.
In
Proceedings. International symposium Salmonella and salmonellosis. Zoopôle, Ploufragan, France.
|
| 10a.
|
Office International des Epizooties.
1996.
OIE manual of standards for diagnostic tests and vaccines.
Office International des Epizooties, Paris, France.
|
| 11.
|
Richardson, A.
1973.
Serological responses of Salmonella dublin carrier cows.
Br. Vet. J.
129:liii-liv[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Richardson, A. R.
1973.
The transmission of Salmonella dublin to calves from adult carrier cows.
Vet. Rec.
92:112-115[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Robertsson, J. A.
1984.
Humoral antibody responses to experimental and spontaneous Salmonella infections in cattle measured by ELISA.
Zentbl. Vet. Med.
31:367-380.
|
| 14.
|
Roden, D. L.,
B. P. Smith,
S. J. Spier, and G. W. Dilling.
1992.
Effect of calf age and Salmonella bacterin type on ability to produce immunoglobulins directed against Salmonella whole cells or lipopolysaccharide.
Am. J. Vet. Res.
53:1895-1899[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Smith, B. P.,
D. G. Oliver,
P. Singh,
G. Dilling,
P. A. Marvin,
B. P. Ram,
L. S. Jang,
N. Sharkov,
J. S. Orsborn, and K. Jackett.
1993.
Detection of Salmonella dublin mammary gland infection in carrier cows, using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for antibody in milk or serum.
Am. J. Vet. Res.
50:1352-1360.
|
| 16.
|
Spier, S. J.,
B. P. Smith,
J. W. Cullor,
J. S. Dilling, and L. D. Pfaff.
1990.
Use of Elisa for detection of immunoglobulins G and M that recognize Salmonella dublin lipopolysaccharide for prediction of carrier status in cattle.
Am. J. Vet. Res.
51:1900-1904[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
van Zijderveld, F. G.,
F. Westenbrink,
J. Anakotta,
R. A. M. Brouwers, and A. M. van Zijderveld.
1989.
Characterization of the F41 fimbrial antigen of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli by using monoclonal antibodies.
Infect. Immun.
57:1192-1199[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
van Zijderveld, F. G.,
A. M. van Zijderveld-van Bemmel, and J. Anakotta.
1992.
Comparison of four different enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for serological diagnosis of Salmonella enteritidis infection in experimentally infected chickens.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
30:2560-2566[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Visser, I. J. R.,
M. Veen, and J. W. B van der Giesen.
1992.
Salmonella dublin infections in dairy cattle, a review.
Tijdschr. Diergeneeskd.
117:730-735[Medline].
|
| 20.
|
World Health Organization.
1988.
Salmonellosis control: the role of animal and product hygiene. WHO technical report series no. 774.
World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
|
| 21.
|
Wray, C.,
J. A. Morris, and W. J. Sojka.
1975.
A comparison of indirect haemagglutination tests and serum agglutination tests for the serological diagnosis of Salmonella dublin infection in cattle.
Br. Vet. J.
131:727-737[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Wray, C., and W. J. Sojka.
1984.
The serological responses of calves to live Salmonella dublin vaccine a comparison of different serological tests.
J. Biol. Stand.
12:277-282[CrossRef][Medline].
|
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, December 2000, p. 4402-4407, Vol. 38, No. 12
0095-1137/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Kroll, J. J., Eichmeyer, M. A., Schaeffer, M. L., McOrist, S., Harris, D. L., Roof, M. B.
(2005). Lipopolysaccharide-Based Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Experimental Use in Detection of Antibodies to Lawsonia intracellularis in Pigs. CVI
12: 693-699
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Pao, S., Patel, D., Kalantari, A., Tritschler, J. P., Wildeus, S., Sayre, B. L.
(2005). Detection of Salmonella Strains and Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Feces of Small Ruminants and Their Isolation with Various Media. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
71: 2158-2161
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Veling, J., van Zijderveld, F. G., van Zijderveld-van Bemmel, A. M., Schukken, Y. H., Barkema, H. W.
(2001). Evaluation of Two Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays for Detecting Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica Serovar Dublin Antibodies in Bulk Milk. CVI
8: 1049-1055
[Abstract]
[Full Text]