Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, February 2000, p. 905-909, Vol. 38, No. 2
0095-1137/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Epidemiology of Glycopeptide-Resistant Enterococci
Colonizing High-Risk Patients in Hospitals in Johannesburg, Republic of
South Africa
Anne
von Gottberg,
Wim
van Nierop,*
Adriano
Dusé,
Marlene
Kassel,
Kerrigan
McCarthy,
Adrian
Brink,
Marilyn
Meyers,
Raymond
Smego, and
Hendrik
Koornhof
Department of Clinical Microbiology and
Infectious Diseases, University of the Witwatersrand, and the South
African Institute for Medical Research, Johannesburg, Republic of South
Africa
Received 2 June 1999/Returned for modification 4 October
1999/Accepted 19 November 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
Recent cases of infections caused by glycopeptide-resistant
enterococci (GRE) have highlighted the emergence of these organisms in
the Republic of South Africa. During May 1998 we conducted a prevalence
study in four hospitals in Johannesburg and obtained 184 rectal swabs
from patients identified as being at high risk for GRE colonization.
Twenty enterococcal isolates showing various glycopeptide resistance
genotypes were recovered: 3 Enterococcus faecium vanA
isolates, 10 E. faecium vanB isolates, 6 E. gallinarum vanC1 isolates, and 1 E. avium vanA
isolate. Macrorestriction analysis was used to demonstrate the clonal
spread of GRE strains within hospitals. Evidence also demonstrated the
likely persistence of the original E. faecium vanA isolate
associated with the first confirmed death contributed to by GRE
infection in South Africa in March 1997.
 |
TEXT |
Glycopeptide-resistant enterococci
(GRE) have emerged over the last decade as important nosocomial
pathogens (17, 27). The epidemiology of GRE colonization,
infection, and rapid dissemination in the United States and in western
Europe is well described, and prevalence rates vary among different
centers (11). Control of these infections involves stringent
infection control measures, prudent antibiotic use, and an
understanding of the epidemiology of infections through improved
surveillance (14). Risk factors for colonization with GRE
have been documented and are similar for various centers (2, 13,
14, 19, 21).
Once GRE infections are detected in a country, a rapid increase in the
number of cases is generally demonstrated (1, 14, 18). The
preponderance of the vanA genotype has been shown in some
countries (14, 18) but may become evident only after several
years of GRE endemicity (16). In a study from Australia the
predominant genotype of clinical Enterococcus faecium
isolates was vanB (1), suggesting a different
epidemiology for these organisms.
The first two documented GRE infections in the Republic of South Africa
corresponded phenotypically with VanA (3). In the present
study we characterized the strains genotypically and compared them with
those colonizing high-risk patients. Subsequent to this prevalence
study, an additional five patients in Johannesburg were confirmed to be
colonized with GRE, and details about them are included in this report.
Patients were screened for GRE in high-risk wards in four Johannesburg
hospitals. These included intensive care units (ICU), oncology wards,
renal dialysis units, and a burn unit. Criteria for screening included
admission to one of these units for
5 days or regular outpatient
attendance at oncology or renal dialysis units. After written informed
consent was obtained, demographic patient data and possible risk
factors were recorded and a rectal swab was taken. Data collected
included age, sex, ward and hospital, number of days in the hospital,
transfer from another hospital, primary diagnosis on admission,
underlying risk factors, history of diarrhea, history of surgical
procedures and other invasive medical procedures, and current and
previous antibiotics (up to 4 weeks prior) used. Of 184 rectal swabs
collected, 78 (42.4%) came from state hospital S1, a tertiary-care
academic hospital with 1,165 beds. In S1 a total of 122 patients were
considered high-risk inpatients or were on chronic hemodialysis: 6%
did not fulfill inclusion criteria, and others did not give consent or were not approached due to time constraints. In state hospital S2, a
tertiary-care academic hospital with 2,500 beds, rectal swabs were
collected from 55 patients, constituting a convenience sample of 29.9%
of a total of 172 high-risk inpatients or chronic dialysis patients. No
patients from this hospital were excluded on the basis of inclusion
criteria. From P1, a 408-bed private hospital, with 11 patients
considered eligible in ICU and 50 patients on chronic dialysis, 22 rectal swabs (12% of all swabs) were collected. Of these, 8 came from
ICU patients (informed consent was not obtained from other patients)
and 14 came from renal patients (representing a convenience sample).
Private hospital P2, with 321 beds, had 58 ICU patients, and swabs were
taken from 29 patients (15.8% of total) who either satisfied inclusion
criteria or gave informed consent.
Four media were used for screening for vancomycin-resistant
enterococci: bile esculin azide agar (Enterococcosel agar; Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Mich.) (15), bile esculin (Difco
Laboratories) plus staphylococcus or streptococcus supplement (Oxoid,
Basingstoke, United Kingdom), colistin-nalidixic acid agar (Difco
Laboratories) plus 2.5 µg of amphotericin B (Squibb Laboratories, SA)
per ml (26), and bile esculin azide broth (Enterococcosel
broth; Difco Laboratories). Each medium contained 10 µg of vancomycin
(Eli Lilly, SA) per ml.
Cotton wool-tipped swabs with Stuart's transport medium were
distributed to the investigators at each of the hospitals. Rectal or
perianal swabs were taken by the investigators or nursing staff or by
the patients themselves after adequate instruction. Swabs were plated
onto media within 24 h of collection in our central laboratory.
Care was taken to systematically alternate the sequence of inoculation
of all the laboratory media. No broth enrichment step was used.
Media were incubated at 35°C in ambient air, and results were read at
24 and 48 h. Esculin hydrolysis in the broth medium was considered
an indicator of the possible presence of GRE. Broths exhibiting esculin
hydrolysis were subcultured onto blood agar plates, which were then
incubated for 24 to 48 h.
The following strains were used as controls: E. casseliflavus ATCC 25788 (vanC2; vancomycin MIC, 16 µg/ml; teicoplanin MIC, 0.5 µg/ml); E. faecalis ATCC
51575 (vanB; vancomycin MIC, >64 µg/ml; teicoplanin MIC,
<0.12 µg/ml) and ATCC 51299 (vanB; vancomycin MIC, 2 µg/ml; teicoplanin MIC, <0.12 µg/ml); and E. faecium
ATCC 19434 (vancomycin MIC, 0.25 µg/ml; teicoplanin MIC, <0.12
µg/ml) and ATCC 51559 (vanA; vancomycin MIC, 64 µg/ml;
teicoplanin MIC, 64 µg/ml). Additional isolates included two strains
isolated from patients with GRE infection in 1997 from two of the study
hospitals: E. faecium vanA from S1 and E. faecalis
vanA from S2 (3). Five subsequent GRE isolates from
patients in Johannesburg were also included. One was from a tracheal
aspirate (for this patient, GRE were also found in urine, a rectal
swab, and a catheter tip), two were from catheter tips, one was from
fluid from an abdominal drain, and one was from a tissue biopsy in a
burn patient.
All isolates were identified to the species level (4, 10).
Isolates were tested for motility, determined on semisolid agar stabs,
and for pigmentation. Biotyping was correlated with species
identification using multiplex PCR (9). MICs were determined by the microdilution method according to the National Committee for
Clinical Laboratory Standards criteria. Isolates were tested for
-lactamase production with the chromogenic cephalosporin nitrocefin
(23).
Multiplex PCR based on the method developed by Dutka-Malen et al.
(9) was performed on all enterococcal isolates.
Macrorestriction analysis was performed using the methods described by
Murray et al. (22). EpiInfo (version 6.01) was used for data
analysis. For categorical variables Fisher's exact two-tailed test or
Yates' corrected chi-square test was used, and the Mann-Whitney U test was used for continuous variables.
Twenty of the 184 patients (10.9%) who were included in the study were
colonized with GRE: 3 with E. faecium vanA, 10 with E. faecium vanB, 6 with E. gallinarum vanC1, and 1 with
E. avium vanA. Details for those patients harboring GRE
isolates are shown in Table 1. Of the 184 patients included in the study, 85 (46.2%) were female, and 99 (53.8%) were male; 177 (97.8%) were human immunodeficiency virus
(HIV) seronegative, and 4 (2.2%) were HIV seropositive. The mean age
of those patients above the age of 1 year was 36.3 years. Ten patients
were less than 1 year of age. Of the patients selected, 94 (51.1%) had
a history of recent surgery and 77 (42.1%) were on hemodialysis. Three
patients (1.6%) were renal transplant recipients, 5 (2.7%) were
premature infants, 34 (18.5%) had documented malignancies, and 13 (7.1%) were burn patients. History of previous or current antibiotic
use was obtained for 183 patients, with 105 (57.3%) receiving
antimicrobials.
At hospital S1, swab samples were obtained from 78 patients from
different wards; 9 (11.5%) patients were found to be colonized with
GRE (Table 2). Five patients were
colonized with E. faecium vanB (patients 2 to 6). Of these,
patients 2 and 3 (Fig. 1, lanes 2 and 3)
had identical strains, and these were very similar to the strain
isolated from patient 5 (lane 5), with a two-band difference. Patients
4 and 6 (lanes 4 and 6) show identical fingerprinting patterns but had
more than four band differences from the former strains. We therefore
had three strains isolated from five patients, two strains being
closely related and the third strain being more distantly related
(26).

View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Macrorestriction analysis of GRE isolates. Lanes 1 through 13, isolates from patients 1 through 13 as identified in Tables
1 and 2; lanes 14 to 19, E. faecium vanA (type A) isolated
from S1 in 1997 and four different private hospitals in 1998; lane 20, E. faecium vanA (ATCC 51559); lanes 21 and 22, E. faecalis vanA isolates from S1 and S2; lane 23, E. faecalis
vanA (ATCC 51299). The leftmost and rightmost lanes contain
molecular size markers (PFGE marker 1 [ ladder]; Boehringer GmbH,
Mannheim, Germany).
|
|
Patient 1 was colonized with the same strain of E. faecium
vanA as was isolated in March 1997 from a patient in S1 (Fig. 1, lane 14) and in hospital P3 (a privately run hospital not included in
the surveillance study) before transfer (lane 15). Each of these
strains has a one band variation, possibly as a consequence of repeated
subculturing. This strain has subsequently been repeatedly isolated
from a patient at a fourth private hospital, P4. The patient died 2 weeks after the first isolate was identified from a tracheal aspirate
(lane 16). A second patient from the same hospital was also colonized
with this strain a month later (lane 17). Two more private hospitals
have yielded this strain from clinical specimens in patients thought
only to be colonized (lanes 18 and 19). This strain was also isolated
from most patients involved in an outbreak in hospital S1 (K. McCarthy,
W. van Nierop, A. Dusé, W. Bezwoda, A. von Gottberg, M. Kassel,
O. Perovic, and R. Smego, submitted for publication). One patient in
hospital S1 was colonized with an E. avium strain with a
vanA genotype.
Hospital S2 had only one patient (1.8%) colonized with GRE, an
E. gallinarum strain. At hospital P1 a total of six patients (27%) were colonized with GRE. Five patients were colonized with E. faecium vanB; three of these patients carried an
identical strain (patients 7, 8, and 11 [Fig. 1, lanes 7, 8, and
11]), while the remaining two patients (lanes 9 and 10) carried the
same strain, which differed from the former by only two bands. Four
patients (13.8%) in total were colonized with GRE in hospital P2. Two
patients (lanes 12 and 13) were colonized with E. faecium
vanA, and these two strains differed only by one band in
pulse-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).
Of the variables recorded, frequency of the isolation of GRE from
different hospitals was statistically significant, the recovery of GRE
from hospital P1 being the highest and the yield from S2 being the
lowest (P = 0.011). The difference between state
hospitals and private hospitals was also statistically significant: 10 of 133 (7.5%) patients in state hospitals were colonized, compared to
10 of 51 (19.6%) in private hospitals (P = 0.036).
Females were more likely to be colonized with glycopeptide-resistant
organisms than males (P = 0.04). History of diarrhea (3 of 11 patients with history of diarrhea versus 17 of 173 without
[P = 0.10]), hemodialysis (7 of 77 versus 13 of 106 [P = 0.66]), and current or previous antibiotic use
within 4 weeks of the rectal swab (14 of 105 versus 6 of 78 [P = 0.33]) did not show any statistical correlation
with GRE carriage. The mean number of days in the ward for inpatients (96 patients) colonized with GRE was 19.3, and that for those not
colonized was 27.2 (P = 0.386). Other variables, such
as HIV status, renal transplantation, malignancy, history of surgery, and catheterization, showed no association with GRE colonization.
Discussion.
This study of GRE strains and their
characterization with macrorestriction analysis has highlighted the
colonization patterns of E. faecium of the vanB
and vanA genotypes in our hospitals and their potential for
causing disease outbreaks in high-risk patients. Although E. faecium vanA is more commonly reported in outbreaks, the
importance of E. faecium vanB as a nosocomial pathogen has
been previously described (2, 19, 20). We documented E. faecium vanB rectal colonization only in this study, with
no clinically significant isolates yet identified in our hospitals.
We were able to demonstrate clonal spread of
vanA and
vanB strains within different hospitals, with possible
interhospital
spread and persistence of one
E. faecium vanA
strain (type A)
within hospitals in the city, as has been described for
other
centers (
8,
12,
22,
24). Spread of a strain from one
hospital (P3) to a second hospital (S1) was documented when a
patient
who was colonized a
vanA strain was transferred in 1997
to
the ICU in hospital S1. This strain was isolated from a rectal
swab
from a patient in the same ward during the prevalence study
and has
been isolated from clinical specimens from three other
hospitals in
Johannesburg (Fig.
1, lanes 16 to 19). Subsequent
to this surveillance
study there was an outbreak in hospital S1
with the above-mentioned
strain, isolated from clinical specimens
from four patients in the
affected ward (McCarthy et al.,
submitted).
The persistence of the type A strain over a period of more than 1 year,
its widespread distribution (six different hospitals
in Johannesburg
during 1997 and 1998), and its predominance among
all clinical isolates
suggest the possibility of increased virulence
and/or adaptation to
spread. Similar instances of clonal spread
of GRE have been described
(
2,
5,
12,
24), but such
spread is poorly understood. Clonal
spread is also seen once GRE
colonization is well established in a
particular center and may
play a role in maintaining the endemicity of
GRE (
16).
No
E. faecalis vanB strain has as yet been isolated in our
diagnostic laboratories in Johannesburg; this may be due to the
difficulty of identifying
vanB isolates, especially if these
have
intermediate to low levels of resistance (
6,
7,
25).
The inability to document significant clinical and epidemiological risk
factors in this study, including no significant correlation
with
previous antibiotic use, may lie in the bias of our patient
selection
and the small numbers of patients who were colonized
with GRE. Only
high-risk patients in high-risk hospital settings
were considered for
rectal swabs to increase the possible yield
and save costs, thus
reducing the ability to differentiate risk
factors that may have been
associated with GRE colonization. The
significantly higher prevalence
of GRE in the two private hospitals
suggests that such hospitals, which
are less restricted financially
and have fewer constraints on
antibiotic usage, may be at greater
risk. Rates of colonization may
also be less representative due
to limited sampling. Prevalence rates
could also have been higher
had we used the more sensitive broth
enrichment technique. The
prevalence of colonization documented in this
study refers only
to high-risk patients in tertiary-care hospitals,
where patient
profiles and antibiotic usage are very different from
those in
smaller or rural hospitals in South
Africa.
Elsewhere in South Africa, four clinical isolates of
E. faecalis
vanB and one strain of
E. gallinarum were isolated in a
hospital
in Bloemfontein, Free State, in 1995 (
7). In a
hospital in
Cape Town, an
E. faecium vanA strain was
isolated in 1993 from
a clinical specimen (
7). Another large
university hospital
in Cape Town yielded only two
E. gallinarum isolates when 230
consecutive clinical isolates from
1997 were screened by disk
susceptibility testing, E-test quantitative
MIC testing, and PCR
(
7).
Our findings confirm the potential for interhospital spread of GRE and
highlight the importance of developing appropriate
infection control
protocols for early implementation (
14). The
media for
screening for vancomycin-resistant enterococci may be
successfully
utilized for routine surveillance, even in smaller
hospital
laboratories, without much additional cost. Measures
such as prudent
antibiotic use, contact isolation, adequate handwashing
by health-care
workers, and decontamination of environmental surfaces
and contaminated
items should be adopted to prevent escalation
of this nosocomial
problem. Such measures have been successful
in some outbreak
interventions (
2), although other authors
have documented no
decrease in endemic colonization or infections
despite their
implementation (
21).
In conclusion, although data are limited, South Africa is presently
experiencing an early stage in the epidemiology of GRE,
with patients
in certain hospitals colonized with single clones
of resistant
enterococci, while other large academic centers have
yet to describe
GRE infections (
7). The rapid evolution of
this epidemic is
predicted, with one strain,
E. faecium vanA type
A, already
exhibiting interhospital
spread.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Nancye Clark from the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention and Daniel Monget from Biomerieux S.A., Marcy L'Etoile, France, for assistance in the identification of organism 73 as E. avium and in the confirmation of the presence of the genotype vanA; thanks are also due to Heidi Toxopeus, Thora Capper,
Marshagne Smith, and Lesley McGee for technical assistance and to the
staff and patients of the participating hospitals.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: P.O. Box 2115, Houghton 2041, Republic of South Africa. Phone: 11 489 8587. Fax: 11 489 8530. E-mail: 174wim{at}chiron.wits.ac.za.
Present address: Drs Bruinette, Kramer, and Partners, Johannesburg,
Republic of South Africa.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Bell, J. M.,
J. C. Paton, and J. Turnidge.
1998.
Emergence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in Australia: phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of isolates.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
36:2187-2190[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Boyce, J. M.,
S. M. Opal,
J. W. Chow,
M. J. Zervos,
G. Potter-Bynoe,
C. B. Sherman,
R. L. C. Romulo,
S. Fortna, and A. A. Medeiros.
1994.
Outbreak of multidrug-resistant Enterococcus faecium with transferable vanB class vancomycin resistance.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
32:1148-1153[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Budavari, S. M.,
G. L. Saunders,
L. D. Liebowitz,
M. Khoosal, and H. H. Crewe-Brown.
1997.
Emergence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in South Africa.
S. Afr. Med. J.
87:1557[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Carvalho, M. D. G. S.,
L. M. Teixeira, and R. R. Facklam.
1998.
Use of tests for acidification of methyl- -D-glucopyranoside and susceptibility to efrotomycin for differentiation of strains of Enterococcus and some related genera.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
36:1584-1587[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Chow, J. W.,
A. Kuritza,
D. M. Shaes,
M. Green,
D. F. Sahm, and M. J. Zervos.
1993.
Clonal spread of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium between patients in three hospitals in two states.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
31:1609-1611[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Cookson, S. T.,
H. Lopardo,
M. Marin,
R. Arduino,
M. J. Rial,
M. Altschuler,
L. Galanternik,
J. M. Swenson,
J. I. Tokars, and W. R. Jarvis.
1997.
Study to determine the ability of clinical laboratories to detect antimicrobial-resistant Enterococcus spp. in Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.
29:107-109[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Derby, P.,
B. Allan,
M. Lambrick, and B. Gay Elisha.
1998.
Detection of glycopeptide-resistant enterococci using susceptibility testing and PCR.
S. Afr. J. Epidemiol. Infect.
13:66-69.
|
| 8.
|
Dunne, W. M., and W. Wang.
1997.
Clonal dissemination and colony morphotype variation of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium isolates in metropolitan Detroit, Michigan.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
35:388-392[Abstract].
|
| 9.
|
Dutka-Malen, S.,
S. Evers, and P. Courvalin.
1995.
Detection of glycopeptide resistance genotypes and identification to the species level of clinically relevant enterococci by PCR.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
33:24-27[Abstract].
|
| 10.
|
Facklam, R. R., and M. D. Collins.
1989.
Identification of Enterococcus species isolated from human infections by a conventional test scheme.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
27:731-734[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
French, G. L.
1998.
Enterococci and vancomycin resistance.
Clin. Infect. Dis.
27(Suppl. 1):S75-S83.
|
| 12.
|
Fridkin, S. K.,
D. S. Yokoe,
C. G. Whitney,
A. Onderdonk, and D. C. Hooper.
1998.
Epidemiology of a dominant clonal strain of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium at separate hospitals in Boston, Massachusetts.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
36:965-970[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Gordts, B.,
H. Van Landuyt,
M. Ieven,
P. Vandamme, and H. Goossens.
1995.
Vancomycin-resistant enterococci colonizing the intestinal tracts of hospitalized patients.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
33:2842-2846[Abstract].
|
| 14.
|
Huycke, M. M.,
D. F. Sahm, and M. S. Gilmore.
1998.
Multiple-drug resistant enterococci: the nature of the problem and an agenda for the future.
Emerg. Infect. Dis.
4:239-249[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Jensen, B. J.
1996.
Screening specimens for vancomycin-resistant enterococcus.
Lab. Med.
27:53-55.
|
| 16.
|
Kim, W.,
R. A. Weinstein, and M. K. Hayden.
1999.
The changing molecular epidemiology and establishment of endemicity of vancomycin resistance in enterococci at one hospital over a 6-year period.
J. Infect. Dis.
179:163-171[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Leclercq, R.,
E. Derlot,
J. Duval, and P. Courvalin.
1988.
Plasmid-mediated resistance to vancomycin and teicoplanin in Enterococcus faecium.
N. Engl. J. Med.
319:157-161[Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Marcus, N.,
N. Peled, and P. Yagupsky.
1997.
Rapid increase in the prevalence of antimicrobial drug resistance among enterococcal blood isolates in southern Israel.
Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.
16:913-915[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 19.
|
McNeeley, D. F.,
A. E. Brown,
G. J. Noel,
M. Chung, and H. de Lancastre.
1998.
An investigation of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium within the pediatric service of a large urban medical center.
Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J.
17:184-188[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Moreno, F.,
P. Grota,
C. Crisp,
K. Magnon,
G. P. Melcher,
J. H. Jorgensen, and J. E. Patterson.
1995.
Clinical and molecular epidemiology of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium during its emergence in a city in southern Texas.
Clin. Infect. Dis.
21:1234-1237[Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Morris, J. G., Jr.,
D. K. Shay,
J. N. Hebden,
R. J. McCarter, Jr.,
B. E. Perdue,
W. Jarvis,
J. A. Johnson,
T. C. Dowling,
L. B. Polish, and R. S. Schwalbe.
1995.
Enterococci resistant to multiple antimicrobial agents, including vancomycin. Establishment of endemicity in a university medical center.
Ann. Intern. Med.
123:250-259[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Murray, B. E.,
K. V. Singh,
J. D. Heath,
B. R. Sharma, and G. M. Weinstock.
1990.
Comparison of genomic DNAs of different enterococcal isolates using restriction endonucleases with infrequent recognition sites.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
28:2059-2063[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
O'Callaghan, C. H.,
A. Morris,
S. M. Kirby, and A. H. Shingler.
1972.
Novel method for detection of -lactamases by using a chromogenic cephalosporin substrate.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
1:283-288[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Pegues, D. A.,
C. F. Pegues,
P. L. Hibberd,
D. S. Ford, and D. C. Hooper.
1997.
Emergence and dissemination of a highly vancomycin-resistant vanA strain of Enterococcus faecium at a large teaching hospital.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
35:1565-1570[Abstract].
|
| 25.
|
Tenover, F. C.
1998.
Laboratory methods for surveillance of vancomycin-resistant enterococci.
Clin. Microbiol. Newsl.
20:1-5.
|
| 26.
|
Tenover, F. C.,
R. D. Arbeit,
R. V. Goering,
P. A. Mickelsen,
B. A. Murray,
D. H. Persing, and B. Swaminathan.
1995.
Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
33:2233-2239[Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Uttley, A. H. C.,
C. H. Collins,
J. Naidoo, and R. C. George.
1988.
Vancomycin-resistant enterococci.
Lancet
i:57-58[CrossRef].
|
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, February 2000, p. 905-909, Vol. 38, No. 2
0095-1137/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.