Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, March 2000, p. 1286-1289, Vol. 38, No. 3
Department of Virology, Oswaldo Cruz
Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro,
Brazil1; Department of Virology, Centro
Nacional de Diagnóstico y Referencia, Ministry of Health,
Managua, Nicaragua2; and Infectious
Diseases Unit, Division of Public Health Biology and Epidemiology,
School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley,
California3
Received 7 October 1999/Returned for modification 22 November
1999/Accepted 24 December 1999
We previously reported a simple subtyping method, restriction
site-specific PCR (RSS-PCR), for dengue virus serotypes 2 and 3; here
we describe its application for subtyping dengue virus serotypes 1 and
4. Three major RSS-PCR types were observed for dengue virus serotype 1 and two types were observed for dengue virus serotype 4, in agreement
with previous strain classifications based on sequence analysis.
Because of its simplicity, this method is amenable to rapid subtyping
and application to epidemiological studies of dengue in countries where
dengue is endemic.
Dengue viruses are single-stranded,
enveloped RNA flaviviruses which are traditionally classified into four
serotypes, designated dengue-1, -2, -3, and -4, based on antigenic
characteristics (2, 19). Numerous methods, including RNase
T1 oligonucleotide fingerprinting, restriction enzyme
analysis, and nucleotide sequencing of different genomic fragments,
have demonstrated strain variation within each dengue serotype,
dividing them into distinct genetic subtypes (4, 5, 10, 11, 12,
13, 16, 17, 18). Dengue virus classification into subtypes is
useful for studying the global distribution and movement of dengue
serotypes, which contributes to the identification of viral factors
that influence disease severity and risk factors associated with the
transmission of particular strains.
Accurate characterization of strain difference usually requires
labor-intensive typing procedures, which are difficult to perform in a
timely manner during epidemic periods. Recently, a new PCR-based
approach to rapidly subtype dengue viruses was developed (8)
and consists of a single reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR)
amplification using four primers that target regions spanning
polymorphic endonuclease restriction sites within the envelope (E)
gene. This method, called restriction site-specific PCR (RSS-PCR), is
simple, rapid, requires minimal laboratory equipment, and uses widely
available reagents. The successful results obtained with dengue-2 and
dengue-3 led us to develop the RSS-PCR method for dengue-1 and dengue-4 strains.
Dengue-1 (Table 1) and dengue-4 (Table
2) strains representing a broad
geographical distribution were obtained from existing collections;
Brazilian and Nicaraguan viruses were isolated from sera by inoculation
into the Aedes albopictus cell line C6/36 (9) and
were identified by immunofluorescence using type-specific monoclonal
antibodies (6). Viral seeds were propagated once in C6/36
cells grown in Leibovitz-15 or minimal essential medium (Gibco BRL,
Grand Island, N.Y.) containing 10% fetal bovine serum. Primers were
designed based on the sequence around polymorphic restriction sites in
the E gene region of dengue-1 and dengue-4 as described previously
(8). The sequences and genomic positions of primers RSS9 to
RSS12 (dengue-1) and RSS21 to RSS24 (dengue-4) are listed in Table
3.
0095-1137/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Rapid Subtyping of Dengue Virus Serotypes 1 and 4 by Restriction Site-Specific PCR
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
![]()
TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
TABLE 1.
Dengue-1 strains used in
this studya
TABLE 2.
Dengue-4 strains used in this study
TABLE 3.
Sequences and positions of oligonucleotide primers used
to amplify dengue-1 and dengue-4 strains
Viral RNAs were extracted from the supernatants of infected cells using a QIAamp Viral RNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Inc., Valencia, Calif.) according to the manufacturer's protocol or by lysis with guanidine isothiocyanate, extraction with organic solvents, and ethanol precipitation (7). The reaction mixture and electrophoresis conditions were as described previously (8), except that 25-µl reaction volumes were used. Briefly, 2.5 µl of viral RNA was added to 22.5 µl of an RT-PCR mixture consisting of 50 mM potassium chloride, 10 mM Tris (pH 8.5), 0.01% gelatin, 200 µM concentrations of each of the four deoxynucleoside triphosphates, 1.5 mM magnesium chloride, 30 mM tetramethylammonium chloride, 0.5 M betaine, 5 mM dithiothreitol, 0.5 µM concentrations of each of four RSS-PCR primers (RSS9 to -12 for dengue-1 and RSS21 to -24 for dengue-4), 0.025 U of RT RAV-2 (Amersham Corp., Arlington Heights, Ill.) per µl and 0.025 U of Taq DNA polymerase (AmpliTaq; Perkin-Elmer Corp., Foster City, Calif.) per µl. Reverse transcription was conducted at 42°C for 60 min, followed directly by 30 amplification cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 60°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 2 min, with a final extension at 72°C for 5 min. Amplification was conducted with 0.5-ml tubes (USA Scientific, Ocala, Fla.) in a model PTC-200 thermocycler (MJ Research, Inc., Watertown, Mass.).
We selected sets of strains in our collection that represented each of
three dengue-1 genotypes previously described by E-NS1 sequence
pairwise comparison (13), with one set including strains from Southeast Asia and the South Pacific, another containing viruses
from Thailand and Taiwan, and a third containing isolates from the
Americas, Africa, and Southeast Asia. The bands generated by the
RSS-PCR assay using primers RSS9 to -12 showed distinct patterns for
American and Asian strains. Figure 1
shows representative examples of each RSS-PCR pattern for dengue-1
viruses, along with a schematic diagram summarizing the results. The
first group (type A), which includes viruses from the Philippines (1983 to 1984), Indonesia (1976 to 1978), Thailand (1975, 1979, and 1980),
and the western Pacific (1980), was divided into two subgroups (A1 and
A2), depending on the presence of an ~200-bp fragment. The second
group (type B) contains isolates from Thailand (1973, 1974, and 1980),
and the third group (type C) is composed of strains from the Americas,
Africa, and Sri Lanka. These RSS primers are specific for dengue-1, as
dengue-2, -3, and -4 did not generate amplified products in this assay
(Fig. 1, lanes 1 to 3).
|
As with dengue-1, several primer sets were tested with dengue-4 strains
from our collection that matched strains previously classified by
sequence analysis of the E gene (10) with respect to
location and date of isolation. The best results were obtained with
primers RSS21 to -24 (Table 3), which were used to analyze the rest of
our dengue-4 strains. Two patterns were generated, as shown in Fig.
2 and Table 2, one (type A) representing
strains from Thailand (1977 to 1988) and the other (type B)
representing viruses isolated in Mexico and the Caribbean. Type A was
divided into two subgroups due to variation in one of the amplified
fragments from a Thai isolate from 1984. Again, no product was obtained with the other three serotypes (Fig. 2).
|
The RSS-PCR method for dengue-1 and -4 fulfills the requisites of a molecular typing assay: the primers were specific to the serotype to which they were developed, the patterns were stable over time, repeated amplification of the same specimens reproducibly yielded the same results, and geographic and temporal clustering was observed. In addition, in areas with extensive dengue transmission, such as Thailand, the cocirculation of two distinct subtypes and of genetic variants within the same subtype was observed, which is consistent with previous reports (13, 15).
The dengue-1 RSS-PCR results, categorized according to country and year of isolation, are essentially the same as the sequence analysis results showing geographic and temporal clustering. A phylogenetic analysis of 40 dengue-1 strains from different geographic areas based on a 240-nt region from the E-NS1 junction defined three main genotypes and two additional ones, each represented by a single virus isolate (13). Similarly, another study comparing the sequences of a 179-nt region of the E genes of 35 dengue-1 isolates yielded three genotypes (4). The largest genotypic group in both analyses consisted of dengue-1 strains from the Americas, Africa, and Southeast Asia, and it corresponds to our RSS-PCR type C. The second genotype, containing viruses from the Philippines, Indonesia, Thailand, and the South Pacific, coincides with RSS-PCR type A, and the third group, consisting of Thai and Taiwanese viruses, corresponds to RSS-PCR type B. RSS-PCR revealed two distinct subtypes (A and B) circulating simultaneously in Thailand, in agreement with previous observations (13).
The dengue-4 isolates we analyzed by RSS-PCR fell into two subtypes, consistent with the two genotypes that resulted from sequence analysis of the entire E gene (10). By both methods, American isolates were contained in a different group than that of Thai viruses. Another phylogenetic analysis derived from sequence comparison of a small 179-nt region of the E gene revealed two subgroups that differed in sequence by 4.9%, again grouping the isolates from the Americas, South Pacific, and Indonesia separately from those from the Philippines, Sri Lanka, and Thailand (4). That dengue-4 yielded fewer subtypes than dengue-1, -2, and -3 is not surprising, since dengue-4 is reported to have less sequence variation in the E gene than the other dengue serotypes (4). A minor difference was observed in pattern A (the absence of a 420 bp-fragment in type A1 compared to A2), indicating a certain degree of genetic variation in Thai isolates (1984).
The occurrence of new dengue epidemics every year emphasizes the need for a simple assay that can facilitate analysis of a large number of samples in order to obtain more detailed epidemiologic information during epidemic periods. The relation between dengue subtype and disease severity has not been extensively studied for dengue-1 or dengue-4 strains, but it warrants further investigation since an association between viruses of Southeast Asian origin and dengue hemorrhagic fever has been reported for dengue-2 and -3 (4, 11, 14). RSS-PCR generates a classification of dengue virus subtypes similar to that obtained using the more labor-intensive and costly sequence analysis approach. In this report, RSS-PCR proved useful in quickly identifying recent isolates of dengue-1 from Brazil (type C) and dengue-4 from Nicaragua (type B). This technique should be valuable as a simple alternative for the rapid characterization of viral isolates and for epidemiologic analysis.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Srisakul Kliks (University of California, San Francisco), Angel Balmaseda (Ministry of Health, Managua, Nicaragua), and Hermann Schatzmayr (Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) for viral strains.
This research was supported by Fogarty International Center grant TW-00905.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Infectious Diseases Unit, Division of Public Health Biology and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, 140 Warren Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720-7360. Phone: (510) 642-4845. Fax: (510) 642-6350. E-mail: eharris{at}socrates.berkeley.edu.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Brazilian Ministry of Health. 1998. Gerência técnica de febre amarela e dengue, Dez 1998. Informe técnico. National Foundation of Health, Brazilian Ministry of Health, Brazilia, Brazil. |
| 2. | Chambers, T. J., C. S. Hahn, R. Galler, and C. M. Rice. 1990. Flavivirus genome organization, expression, and replication. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 44:649-688[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 3. |
Chu, M. C.,
E. J. O. Rourke, and D. W. Trent.
1989.
Genetic relatedness among structural protein genes of dengue 1 virus strains.
J. Gen. Virol.
70:1701-1712 |
| 4. |
Chungue, E.,
O. Cassar,
M. T. Drouet,
M. G. Guzman,
M. Laille,
L. Rosen, and V. Deubel.
1995.
Molecular epidemiology of dengue-1 and dengue-4 viruses.
J. Gen. Virol.
76:1877-1884 |
| 5. | Deubel, V., R. M. Nogueria, M. T. Drouet, H. Zeller, J. M. Reynes, and D. Q. Ha. 1993. Direct sequencing of genomic cDNA fragments amplified by the polymerase chain reaction for molecular epidemiology of dengue-2 viruses. Arch. Virol. 129:197-210[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 6. | Gubler, D. J., G. Kuno, E. Sather, M. Valez, and A. Olivre. 1984. Mosquito cell cultures and specific monoclonal antibodies in surveillance for dengue viruses. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 33:158-165. |
| 7. |
Harris, E.,
T. G. Roberts,
L. Smith,
J. Selle,
L. D. Kramer,
S. Valle,
E. Sandoval, and A. Balmaseda.
1998.
Typing of dengue viruses in clinical specimens and mosquitoes by single-tube multiplex reverse transcriptase PCR.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
36:2634-2639 |
| 8. | Harris, E., E. Sandoval, M. Johnson, A. M. Xet-Mull, and L. W. Riley. 1999. Rapid subtyping of dengue viruses by restriction site-specific (RSS)-PCR. Virology 253:86-95[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 9. | Igarashi, A. 1985. Mosquito cell cultures and the study of arthropod-borne togaviruses. Adv. Virus Res. 30:21-39[Medline]. |
| 10. | Lanciotti, R. S., D. J. Gubler, and D. W. Trent. 1997. Molecular evolution and phylogeny of dengue-4 viruses. J. Gen. Virol. 78:2279-2286[Abstract]. |
| 11. |
Lanciotti, R. S.,
J. G. Lewis,
D. J. Gubler, and D. W. Trent.
1994.
Molecular evolution and epidemiology of dengue-3 viruses.
J. Gen. Virol.
75:65-75 |
| 12. | Lewis, J. G., G.-J. Chang, R. S. Lanciotti, R. M. Kinney, L. M. Mayer, and D. W. Trent. 1993. Phylogenetic relationships of dengue-2 viruses. Virology 197:216-224[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 13. | Rico-Hesse, R. 1990. Molecular evolution and distribution of dengue viruses type 1 and 2 in nature. Virology 174:479-493[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 14. | Rico-Hesse, R., L. M. Harrison, R. Alba Salas, D. Tovar, A. Nisalak, C. Ramos, J. Boshell, M. T. R. De Mesa, R. M. R. Nogueira, and A. Travassos Da Rosa. 1997. Origins of dengue type 2 viruses associated with increased pathogenicity in the Americas. Virology 230:244-251[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 15. | Rico-Hesse, R., L. M. Harrison, A. Nisalak, D. W. Vaughn, S. Kalayanarooj, S. Green, A. L. Rothman, and F. A. Ennis. 1998. Molecular evolution of dengue type 2 virus in Thailand. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 58:96-101[Abstract]. |
| 16. | Trent, D. W., J. A. Grant, T. P. Monath, C. L. Manske, M. Corina, and G. E. Fox. 1989. Genetic variation and microevolution of dengue 2 virus in Southeast Asia. Virology 172:523-535[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 17. | Vorndam, V., G. Kuno, and N. Rosado. 1994. A PCR-restriction enzyme technique for determining dengue virus subgroups within serotypes. J. Virol. Methods 48:237-244[Medline]. |
| 18. | Vorndam, V., R. M. R. Nogueira, and D. W. Trent. 1994. Restriction enzyme analysis of American region dengue viruses. Arch. Virol. 136:191-196[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 19. | Westaway, E. G., M. A. Brinton, S. Y. Gaidamovich, M. C. Horzinek, A. Igarashi, L. Kaariainen, D. K. Lvov, J. E. Porterfield, P. K. Russell, and D. W. Trent. 1985. Flaviviridae. Intervirology 24:183-192[Medline]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»