Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, March 2000, p. 1298-1301, Vol. 38, No. 3
School of Veterinary Medicine, Hebrew
University, Rehovot 76100,1 and Division
of Parasitology, Kimron Veterinary Institute, Beit-Dagan
500250,3 Israel; Department of
Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph,
Ontario N1G 2W1 Canada2; and College of
Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, Alabama 368494
Received 9 August 1999/Returned for modification 19 October
1999/Accepted 3 December 1999
Recognition of Hepatozoon canis and Hepatozoon
americanum as distinct species was supported by the results of
Western immunoblotting of canine anti-H. canis and
anti-H. americanum sera against H. canis
gamonts. Sequence analysis of 368 bases near the 3' end of the 18S rRNA
gene from each species revealed a pairwise difference of 13.59%.
Canine hepatozoonosis is an emerging
protozoal tick-borne infection of dogs that was first reported in the
United States from Texas (8) and Louisiana (10)
and according to recent reports has spread to Alabama, Georgia
(14), and Oklahoma (17). The causative agent of
canine hepatozoonosis in North America is Hepatozoon americanum, an apicomplexan parasite of leukocytes and muscular tissues that induces severe myositis and gait abnormalities
(20). Before 1997, H. americanum was considered a
strain of Hepatozoon canis, a protozoan with morphologically
similar gamonts in leukocytes. H. canis, first reported in
India in 1905 (12), is the cause of Old World canine
hepatozoonosis, which usually causes a milder disease that affects the
spleen, lymph nodes, and bone marrow, resulting in anemia and lethargy
(1). It has been reported from southern Europe, the Middle
East, Africa, and the Far East. The main vector for the disease is the
tick Rhipicephalus sanguineus (5). In the United
States, H. americanum-like oocysts were found in hemocoel
smears made from Amblyomma maculatum ticks found on dogs
with hepatozoonosis (20). This tick has recently been shown
to be capable of transmitting H. americanum, whereas
R. sanguineus failed to transmit this parasite
(15).
The classification of H. americanum as a new species was
based mainly on the clinical signs, tissue tropism, and pathological and morphological findings from dogs with hepatozoonosis in North America, which were different from those reported for H. canis infections from other parts of the world (20).
The aims of this study were to provide further evidence at the
molecular and antigenic levels for the recent species differentiation
between H. americanum and H. canis.
Blood was drawn in an EDTA tube from a 2-year-old Yorkshire Terrier dog
infected with H. americanum admitted to the College of
Veterinary Medicine at Auburn University in Alabama. In Israel, blood
was sampled similarly from a 10-year-old Yorkshire Terrier infected
with H. canis at the Hebrew University School of Veterinary Medicine. Gamonts of Hepatozoon were observed in neutrophils
from both dogs by light microscopy of Giemsa-stained blood smears prior to DNA extraction. Genomic DNA from gamont-infected neutrophils was
extracted and purified using the IsoQuick Kit (Orca Research Incorporated, Bothell, Wash.). A portion of the 3' end of the small-subunit (SSU) rRNA gene was amplified by PCR using internal primer 5'-CCAGGTCCAGACATGG-3' (designated Cocci A) and P3 of
Clark and Diamond (6). PCR mixtures consisted of 10 ng of
template DNA, 5 mM KCl, 1 mM Tris-HCl, 0.1% Triton X-100, 1.5 mM
MgCl2 (the last four reagents from Promega, Madison, Wis.),
200 µM (each) deoxynucleoside triphosphate (Pharmacia Biotech,
Piscataway, N.J.), 1 µM (each) primer, and 2.5 U of Taq
DNA polymerase (Gibco BRL, Life Technologies Inc., Gaithersburg, Md.)
in 100-µl reaction volumes. PCR was performed by using the
following parameters and a thermal cycler (Perkin Elmer Cetus Co.,
Wellesley, Mass.): 94°C for 30 s (melting), 56°C for 1 min
(annealing), and 72°C for 2 min (extension). The resulting PCR
products were electrophoresed on a 1% agarose gel and stained with
ethidium bromide. Product bands were excised from the gel, and DNA was
recovered from gel slices using the GeneClean II Kit (Bio 101, Vista,
Calif.). The PCR products were cloned using the Zero Background/Kan
Cloning Kit (Invitrogen Corporation, Carlsbad, Calif.) and sequenced in both directions with M13 forward and reverse primers using the ABI 377 Prism automated sequencer.
Heparinized peripheral blood (82 ml) was obtained by venipuncture from
a dog naturally infected with H. canis. The infected blood
was layered onto a test tube with a sintered filter (Uni-Sep10+; Novamed, Jerusalem, Israel) that prevents mixing of the blood and the
Ficoll-Hypaque density-gradient medium. After centrifugation at
800 × g for 20 min at room temperature, a fraction
containing leukocytes was collected, suspended in 30 ml of
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (pH 7.2), and washed three times with
PBS by centrifugation at 800 × g for 20 min. The
leukocytes were then resuspended in 30 ml of PBS, equilibrated in a
nitrogen cavitation chamber at 500 lbs/in2 for 10 min, and
disrupted by releasing the pressure (11). The material
containing cell-free gamonts and debris was collected in a centrifuge
tube and centrifuged for 10 min at 800 × g. The pellet
containing purified parasites was resuspended in PBS and washed three
times with PBS by centrifugation at 800 × g for 20 min
at 4°C. The final pellet containing released gamonts was resuspended in 1 ml of PBS, and the number of purified parasites was determined in
a Neubauer hemocytometer with 0.5% trypan blue. The purified and
counted gamonts were frozen at Positive anti-H. canis serum samples were obtained from a
naturally infected dog and an experimentally infected dog with H. canis parasitemia from Israel. The serum from the experimentally infected dog was collected 63 days postinfection. Sera from three dogs
naturally infected with H. americanum from Alabama diagnosed by muscle biopsy (9) were used to test reactivity with
H. canis gamont antigen by Western blotting and indirect
fluorescent-antibody testing (IFAT). Negative-control sera were
obtained from a tick-free laboratory-raised dog prior to infection with
H. canis and from a blood donor dog from the College of
Veterinary Medicine at Auburn, Alabama. The experimentally infected dog
was inoculated with H. canis as previously described
(2). Briefly, a 3-month-old laboratory-raised dog was
inoculated with 30 adult R. sanguineus ticks that were repleted as nymphs on a naturally infected dog. The dog developed hepatozoonosis with parasites which were identified in blood smears and
bone marrow aspirates by light microscopy.
The frozen suspension of purified H. canis gamonts was
thawed at room temperature, and after centrifugation at 800 × g for 5 min, the protein concentration of the supernatant was
determined by the Bradford method (4). The material was
further solubilized in sample buffer (0.025 M Tris-glycine [pH 6.8],
2% [wt/vol] sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS], 15% [wt/vol] glycerol
and bromphenol blue) at 100°C for 3 min. The gamont antigen at 10 µg of protein/lane was subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis (7.5 to 17.5% gradient gel) under nonreducing
conditions (13). The resolved polypeptides were transferred
overnight onto nitrocellulose membranes in Tris-glycine buffer
containing 20% methanol at constant 35 mA and 4°C (19).
The membranes were blocked with PBS containing 3% casein for 2 h
at room temperature, followed by five successive washings with PBS
containing 0.5% Tween 20 (PT). Dog sera were diluted in PT, applied to
individual strips, and incubated overnight at 4°C. The nitrocellulose
strips were washed seven times as described above, and the bound
antibody was detected with rabbit anti-dog immunoglobulin G (IgG)
conjugated to horseradish peroxidase at 1:3,000 dilution in PBS
containing 0.2% bovine serum albumin (BSA). After incubation for
1 h at 37°C, the nitrocellulose strips were washed eight times
with PT and developed with 0.005% 3,3'-diaminobenzidine (DAB) (Sigma,
St. Louis, Mo.) supplemented with 0.03% cobalt chloride and 0.3%
H2O2.
Serum samples were analyzed by IFAT for IgG antibodies reactive with
H. canis antigen (18). Antigen slides were
prepared with blood from a naturally infected dog with high
parasitemia. The buffy coat was washed with PBS by centrifugation three
times, and the final pellet was resuspended in a mixture of equal
volumes of PBS and 3% BSA. Thin smears of buffy coat were made on
glass slides and dried at room temperature. The slides were immersed for 10 min in acetone and then stored at A partial sequence for the 18S SSU rRNA was obtained from H. americanum and H. canis using cycle sequencing of PCR
fragments generated using a combination of a coccidium-specific primer
(Cocci A) and a universal primer (6, 16). The sequences have
been submitted to GenBank under accession numbers AF206669
(H. canis) and AF206668 (H. americanum). A
region of 368 bases from the two Hepatozoon species
infecting dogs near the 3' end of their 18S rRNA genes was used for
further analysis. This region spans three hypervariable regions of the
18S rRNA gene. These partial sequences from the 18S rRNA gene from
H. americanum and H. canis were aligned by eye
against the same region from two other Hepatozoon species,
H. catesbianae (GenBank accession no. AF206670) and H. sipedon (GenBank accession no. AF206671), gamonts of
which occur in the blood of frogs and snakes, respectively. The
alignment (Fig. 1) demonstrated
relatively few differences between the two canine parasites and the
Hepatozoon species infecting frog and snake hosts. Pairwise
differences among taxa in this region of the 18S rRNA gene range from
7.64 to 14.47% (Table 1). The pairwise difference between H. canis and H. americanum was
50 of 368 bases (13.59%).
0095-1137/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Genetic and Antigenic Evidence Supports the
Separation of Hepatozoon canis and Hepatozoon
americanum at the Species Level
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
![]()
TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
70°C, and at each stage of purification, the material was examined by Nomarski phase microscopy.
80°C. Before use, antigen slides, stored at
80°C, were warmed and dried at 37°C for 30 min.
A series of successive twofold dilutions of serum in PBS, from 1:16 to
1:4,096, were applied to the smears and incubated for 30 min at 37°C
in a humid chamber. The slides were washed three times in PBS and
blotted dry. Fluorescein-conjugated rabbit anti-dog IgG was applied to
the wells at 1:70 dilution. The slides were then incubated at 37°C
for 30 min, washed as described above, and dried. The smears were
mounted under coverslips in PBS-buffered glycerol (pH 8.5) and examined
under a fluorescence microscope.

View larger version (41K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 1.
Alignment of a portion of the 18S rRNA gene from
H. americanum (United States) and H. canis
(Israel) and two Hepatozoon species, H. sipedon
from a snake and H. catesbianae from a frog. Only the
nucleotides that are different from those of H. sipedon are
shown.
TABLE 1.
Pairwise differences between pairs of
Hepatozoon species for a 368-base aligned section flanking
the 3' end of the 18S rRNA gene
Western blot analysis of anti-H. canis and anti-H.
americanum sera reacted with H. canis gamont antigens
revealed that multiple bands were recognized by sera from dogs infected
with either Hepatozoon species (Fig.
2). A similarity in the pattern of
reactivity of sera from dogs with H. canis or H. americanum infections was observed for protein bands ranging from
250 to 36 kDa with distinct bands of relative molecular mass (rMM) of
250, 107, 88, 63, and 37 kDa. Reactivity with the 63- and 37-kDa bands
was weaker with anti-H. americanum sera than with
anti-H. canis sera. A triplet of antigenic bands with lower
rMM of 32, 30, and 28 that were reactive with anti-H. canis
were not reactive with anti-H. americanum sera. Minimal weak
nonspecific reactivity was observed with the control and preinfection
sera.
|
By IFAT, serum samples from the two dogs infected with H. canis and the three dogs infected with H. americanum were all reactive with H. canis gamont antigen. Both dogs infected with H. canis demonstrated high titers of 1:1,024 for the experimentally infected dog and 1:4,096 for the naturally infected dog, while those infected with H. americanum had low titers ranging between 1:32 and 1:64. The two control sera showed no reactivity with H. canis antigen by IFAT.
The findings presented in this study demonstrate that the geographically distinct H. canis and H. americanum, previously thought to be strains of the same species (7, 8) and recently classified separately mainly on the basis of different pathological, clinical, and morphological findings (20), also differ at the genetic and antigenic levels.
The genetic distances among the four Hepatozoon species in a portion of the coding region of the 18S rRNA gene were consistent with their recognition as distinct species (20). The pairwise difference between the two parasites of dogs, H. canis and H. americanum, was 13.59% in the short region of the 18S rRNA gene sampled. This interspecific variation was comparable to the differences between the two Hepatozoon species infecting frogs and snakes (e.g., 9.86% between H. catesbianae and H. sipedon). The differences in this region were comparable to the interspecific variation observed among various Eimeria species infecting poultry (3). Since the portion of the coding region sequenced from these four Hepatozoon species contains at least three hypervariable regions, the percentage differences between the various Hepatozoon species for the entire gene are likely to be considerably lower.
The Western blotting patterns observed in this study for reactivity of anti-H. canis and anti-H. americanum sera with H. canis antigen show that although some similarities in reactivity were seen for higher-molecular-mass proteins, three molecular mass bands in the 32- to 28-kDa region detected by anti-H. canis sera were not recognized by anti-H. americanum sera. In addition, the anti-H. canis serum reacted strongly with the 63- and 37-kDa bands of H. canis gamont antigen, while sera from H. americanum-infected dogs recognized these antigens weakly. These findings support the hypothesis that H. canis and H. americanum are antigenically related and show a degree of cross-reactivity by Western blotting, but H. canis is substantially different from H. americanum, as detected by the Western blotting reactivity to certain protein bands only by anti-H. canis serum and the weaker antibody response to other protein bands by anti-H. americanum serum. Similarly, high antibody titers (up to 1:4,096) were obtained in homologous IFAT reactions with the sera used for Western blotting and significantly lower titers (up to 1:64) in heterologous reactions. The low cross-reactive IFAT antibody titers to H. canis antigen demonstrated in the sera of H. americanum-infected dogs are in agreement with the findings of Vincent-Johnson et al. (20), who reported a low to negative reactivity of H. americanum-infected canine sera with H. canis antigen from Israel by IFAT. The low IFAT titers of anti-H. americanum sera may provide another indication that H. americanum shares some antigenic epitopes with H. canis, as seen by Western blotting, but anti-H. americanum serum is distinct and elicits an antibody response that detects only some H. canis antigens.
In conclusion, the genetic and antigenic analyses described in this study provide additional support for the differentiation of H. canis and H. americanum as different species of Hepatozoon that are the causative agents of unique and distinct clinical diseases.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: School of Veterinary Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, P.O. Box 12, Rehovot 76100, Israel. Phone: 972-3-9688557. Fax: 972-3-9604079. E-mail: baneth{at}agri.huji.ac.il.
Present address: 9723 Flagstaff Dr., San Antonio, TX 78217.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Baneth, G., and B. Weigler. 1997. Retrospective case-control study of hepatozoonosis in dogs in Israel. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 11:365-370[Medline]. |
| 2. | Baneth, G., V. Shkap, M. Samish, E. Pipano, and I. Savitsky. 1998. Antibody response to Hepatozoon canis in experimentally infected dogs. Vet. Parasitol. 74:299-305[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 3. | Barta, J. R., D. S. Martin, P. A. Liberator, M. Dashkevicz, J. W. Anderson, S. D. Feighner, A. Elbrecht, A. Perkins-Barrow, M. C. Jenkins, H. D. Danforth, M. D. Ruff, and H. Profous-Juchelka. 1997. Phylogenetic relationships among eight Eimeria species infecting the domestic fowl inferred using complete small subunit ribosomal DNA sequences. J. Parasitol. 83:262-271[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 4. | Bradford, M. M. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72:248-254[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 5. | Christophers, S. R. 1907. The sexual life cycle of Leucocytozoon canis in the tick. Sci. Mem. Off. Med. Sanit. Dep. Gov. India 28:1-11. |
| 6. | Clark, C. G., and L. S. Diamond. 1991. The Laredo strain and other `Entamoeba histolytica-like' amoebae are Entamoeba moshkovskii. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 46:11-18[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 7. | Craig, T. M. 1990. Hepatozoonosis, p. 778-785. In C. E. Greene (ed.), Clinical microbiology and infectious diseases of the dog and cat. W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia, Pa. |
| 8. | Craig, T. M., J. E. Smallwood, K. W. Knauer, and J. P. McGrath. 1978. Hepatozoon canis infection in dogs: clinical, radiographic, and hematological findings. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 173:967-972[Medline]. |
| 9. | Craig, T. M., L. P. Jones, and R. M. Nordgren. 1984. Diagnosis of Hepatozoon canis by muscle biopsy. J. Am. Anim. Hosp. Assoc. 20:301-303. |
| 10. | Gosset, K. A., S. D. Gaunt, and D. S. Aja. 1985. Hepatozoonosis and ehrlichiosis in a dog. J. Am. Anim. Hosp. Assoc. 21:265-267. |
| 11. | Hunter, M. J., and S. L. Commerford. 1961. Pressure homogenization of mammalian tissues. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 47:580-586[Medline]. |
| 12. | James, S. P. 1905. On a parasite found in the white corpuscles of the blood of dogs. Sci. Mem. Off. Med. Sanit. Dep. Gov. India 14:1-12. |
| 13. | Laemmli, U. K. 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680-685[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 14. | Macintire, D. K., N. Vincent-Johnson, A. R. Dillon, B. L. Blagburn, D. S. Lindsay, E. M. Whitley, and C. Banfield. 1997. Hepatozoonosis in dogs: 22 cases (1989-1994). J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 210:916-922[Medline]. |
| 15. | Mathew, J. S., S. A. Ewing, R. J. Panciera, and P. J. Woods. 1998. Experimental transmission of Hepatozoon americanum Vincent-Johnson et al., 1997 to dogs by the Gulf Coast tick, Amblyomma maculatum Koch. Vet. Parasitol. 80:1-14[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 16. | Medlin, L., H. J. Elwood, S. Stickel, and M. L. Sogin. 1988. The characterization of enzymatically amplified eukaryotic 16S-like rRNA-coding regions. Gene 71:491-499[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 17. | Panciera, R. J., N. T. Gatto, M. A. Crystal, R. G. Helman, and R. W. Ely. 1997. Canine hepatozoonosis in Oklahoma. J. Am. Anim. Hosp. Assoc. 33:221-225[Abstract]. |
| 18. |
Shkap, V.,
G. Baneth, and E. Pipano.
1994.
Circulating antibodies to Hepatozoon canis demonstrated by immunofluorescence.
J. Vet. Diagn. Investig.
6:121-123 |
| 19. |
Towbin, H.,
T. Staehelin, and J. Gordon.
1979.
Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and some applications.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
76:4350-4354 |
| 20. | Vincent-Johnson, N. A., D. K. Macintire, D. S. Lindsay, S. D. Lenz, G. Baneth, V. Shkap, and B. L. Blagburn. 1997. A new Hepatozoon species from dogs: description of the causative agent of canine hepatozoonosis in North America. J. Parasitol. 83:1165-1172[CrossRef][Medline]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»