Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2000, p. 1397-1403, Vol. 38, No. 4
Rabies Centre of Expertise, Animal Diseases
Research Institute, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Nepean,
Ontario, Canada, K2H 8P9
Received 30 July 1999/Returned for modification 1 December
1999/Accepted 4 January 2000
A recombinant rabies virus phosphoprotein fusion product (GST-P)
was used to generate a series of monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) with anti-P reactivity. Competitive binding assays classified 27 of
these MAbs into four groups (I to IV), and 24 of them were deemed to
recognize linear epitopes, as judged by their reaction in immunoblots.
The linear epitope recognized in each case was mapped by using two
series of N- and C-terminally deleted recombinant phosphoproteins.
Assessment of the reactivities of representative MAbs to a
variety of lyssavirus isolates by an indirect fluorescent antibody
test indicated that group I MAbs, which recognized a highly conserved
N-terminal epitope, were broadly cross-reactive with all lyssaviruses
assayed, while group III MAbs, which reacted with a site overlapping
that of group I MAbs, exhibited variable reactivities and
group IV MAbs reacted with most isolates of genotypes 1, 6, and 7 only.
In contrast, group II MAbs, which recognized an epitope located
within a highly divergent central portion of the protein, were
exquisitely strain specific. These anti-P MAbs are potentially useful
tools for lyssavirus identification and discrimination.
The negative-sense RNA genome of
lyssaviruses, of which rabies virus (RV) is the prototype, is organized
into five coding regions, N, P, M, G, and L (24). Viral
transcription and replication are catalyzed by the viral polymerase
complex, composed of the L and P proteins, by mechanisms typical of the
Rhabdoviridae (reviewed in reference 1).
Lyssavirus diagnosis targets, by an indirect fluorescent antibody (IFA)
test (6), the highly expressed and well-conserved N protein
(25). Moreover, large panels of anti-N monoclonal antibodies
(MAbs) successfully discriminate between many distinct RV strains
which circulate in specific host reservoirs in discrete geographical
regions (21). Panels of MAbs directed to the RV
surface glycoprotein (G) are also sometimes used for RV
strain discrimination (21), and both anti-N and anti-G MAbs are reported to discriminate between the various serotypes comprising the lyssavirus genus (22). However, low and variable G
protein expression in infected cells, especially in cell culture, can sometimes confound interpretation of anti-G MAb
reactivities. Many genetic analyses of lyssaviruses have targeted
the N (2, 14, 23) and G (26) genes, thereby
complementing the available antigenic data. N gene analysis
distinguished six lyssavirus genotypes corresponding to prior
serological distinctions within the genus (2). Thus,
serogenotypes 1 to 4 include classical RV, Lagos bat virus (LBV),
Mokola virus (MOKV), and Duvenhage virus (DUVV), while two groups
of European bat lyssaviruses (EBL-1 and EBL-2) were assigned to
genotypes 5 and 6, respectively. Recently discovered Australian
bat lyssaviruses (ABLs) have been tentatively assigned to genotype
7 (11). Moreover, the RV lineage was subdivided into
several discrete clades corresponding to geographically separated and host-specific viral populations. Despite the sensitivity
afforded by genotyping strategies, the application of
reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) technology and subsequent
sequence characterization of its products (16) requires
technical facilities, expertise, and considerable care to avoid
spurious results. These restrictions may impose difficult, if not
impossible, constraints on laboratories, especially in developing
countries where rabies enzootics pose a significant threat to human health.
The relatively nonconserved P protein (25), which is
produced by the infected cell in significant quantities, represents a potentially useful alternative antigen for lyssavirus
discrimination. Historically, this target was poorly characterized
antigenically due to limitations in generating monospecific anti-P
antibodies from animals receiving whole virus, and detailed genetic
information was available for only a small number of RV strains
(5, 18, 19, 27) and for MOKV (2). A recent study
on genetic variability of the lyssavirus P locus has indicated
the presence of both conserved and highly divergent domains within the
P protein (S. A. Nadin-Davis et al., manuscript in
preparation). Such regions are potentially interesting targets for the
diagnosis and serological typing of lyssaviruses, respectively. In this
report the use of several recombinant rabies P proteins to generate and
characterize a series of anti-P MAbs with potential typing utility is described.
Construction of a GST-P expression cassette.
The rabies P
gene (Ontario arctic fox strain, Type 1) was amplified from total RNA
extracted from infected brain tissue by RT-PCR essentially as described
elsewhere (17, 18). To facilitate product subcloning, the
positive sense primer
(5'-GTCGGAGATCTATATGAGCAAAATCTTT-3') directed to the start of the P gene open reading frame (ORF) (in boldface) incorporated a 5'-terminal BglII restriction
endonuclease site (underlined); the negative-sense primer
[5'-GAGG(GA)TTTTTGAGTGTCCTCGTC-3'] was directed close to
the start of the neighboring M gene. The purified PCR product was
digested with BglII and EcoRI, the latter site
being present downstream of the P gene ORF, and cloned into the pGEX-3X
vector (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Baie d'Urfe, Quebec, Canada)
restricted with BamHI and EcoRI. A selected clone
(pGEX-RabP) was employed for
isopropyl- Nucleotide sequencing.
The sequences of all clones generated
in these studies were confirmed by manual sequencing using plasmid DNA
templates prepared with a Wizard plasmid isolation kit (Promega Corp.,
Madison, Wis.), 32P-labeled primers and the fmol Cycle
Sequencing Kit (Promega).
Expression of the GST-P product and generation of murine
hybridomas.
Escherichia coli cells (TG1 strain) transformed
with pGEX-RabP were used for GST-P fusion product expression as
described elsewhere (GST gene fusion manual, Pharmacia Biotech, Baie
d'Urfe, Quebec, Canada) except that IPTG induction was performed at
room temperature in the absence of glucose. For large-scale production, cells of a 100-ml culture were harvested, resuspended in 15 ml of
ice-cold 1× phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 67 µg of
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride per ml and lysed using a French press at
1,500 lb/in2. Particulate material was removed by low-speed
centrifugation, (200 × g) for 15 min, and GST-P was
affinity purified by using glutathione-Sepharose 4B resin in a batch
procedure (GST gene fusion manual [Pharmacia Biotech]). The final
eluate was concentrated and exchanged into PBS (pH 7.2) using a
Centricon 10 unit (Amicon, Beverly, Mass.), and the protein
concentration was estimated by obtaining optical density readings at
280 nm; the yield was generally 5 mg/liter of bacterial culture.
0095-1137/00/$04.00+0
A Panel of Monoclonal Antibodies Targeting the Rabies Virus
Phosphoprotein Identifies a Highly Variable Epitope of Value for
Sensitive Strain Discrimination
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG)-inducible expression of a GST-P fusion protein.
Screening of hybridomas for anti-P reactivity. Hybridoma supernatants were screened by two methods: (i) an IFA test performed according to the method of Lafon (15) and employing RV-infected (arctic fox strain) BHK21 C13 cells and (ii) an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), utilizing affinity-purified glutathione S-transferase (GST) or GST-P fusion protein as antigen. Only those MAbs found to be positive by IFA and reacting specifically with the GST-P protein, but not GST, by ELISA were selected for further characterization.
Generation of a series of C-terminally truncated
His6-tagged phosphoprotein fusions.
A positive-sense
primer
(5'-GGTACCCGGGATGAGCAAAATCTTTGTCAATC-3')
paired with a pGEX-directed negative-sense primer were used in a
PCR on pGEX-RabP to generate a new P construct incorporating a
SmaI site (underlined) immediately upstream of the
initiating codon. This product was digested with the restriction endonucleases SmaI and EcoRI, blunt ended, and
inserted into vector pQE-32 (Qiagen, Inc., Mississauga, Ontario,
Canada) restricted at the SmaI site. A plasmid
(pQE-RabP) incorporating the P insert in correct orientation encoded an
IPTG-inducible His6-tagged phosphoprotein. 3'-terminal
deletions of the P gene were generated in pQE-RabP by using the
Henikoff protocol (13), and selected clones were employed
for fusion product expression. Depending upon the alignment of the
reading frame and the stop codon contributed by the vector downstream
of the multiple cloning site, these encoded proteins contained a small
number (
6) of additional C-terminal residues. One additional
construct was generated by PCR in which the positive-sense primer was
paired with a custom negative-sense primer, corresponding to the
complementary sequence of codons for amino acids 134 to 140 and
incorporating a downstream translational stop signal and a
HindIII restriction site.
Generation of a series of N-terminally deleted His6-tagged phosphoproteins. N-terminally truncated P protein constructs were generated by PCR using a negative-sense primer flanking the pQE-32 multiple cloning site and eight different primers, each corresponding to 20 nucleotides of positive-sense internal P gene sequence and bearing an upstream SacI site. This series of 3' coterminal P gene fragments was subcloned into the pQE-30 vector at SacI and PstI sites. All selected clones encoded a truncated P protein bearing a 16-amino-acid N-terminal addition within which the His6 tag was contained.
Expression of His6-tagged P proteins. All pQE-30/32 recombinant vectors were transformed into the E. coli M15, and individual clones were picked for growth and overnight induction by IPTG. Cell extracts were recovered in a denaturing buffer (8 M urea, 0.1 M sodium phosphate, 0.01 M Tris-HCl, pH 8.0), and His6-tagged protein was purified using Ni-nitriloacetic acid resin (QIAexpressionist manual, Qiagen, Inc., Chatsworth, Calif.).
Western blotting. Immunoblots were performed by standard procedures (12). Protein preparations were subjected to electrophoresis through sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-15% polyacrylamide gels and transferred to nitrocellulose by semidry transfer. Blots were processed for colorimetric detection of the primary MAb by using a goat anti-mouse horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugate (Jackson Immunoresearch) with diaminobenzidine and H2O2.
Indirect ELISA screening of hybridoma supernatants. Ninety-six-well plates (Nunc 269260; Canadian Life Technologies, Inc.) were coated with 0.25 µg of purified recombinant protein per well in bicarbonate coating buffer overnight at 4°C. Plates were washed five times with PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20 (PBST) using a Bio-Tek Automated Plate Washer Model EL403 (Mandel Scientific, Guelph, Ontario, Canada), blocked with 2% skim milk in PBST for 1 h at 37°C, and then rewashed. Hybridoma supernatants were applied and incubated at 37°C for 1.5 h. After rewashing the plates with PBST, HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (IgG; Jackson Immunoresearch) was applied as secondary antibody, and this was detected by using 1 mM peroxide and 4 mM chromogen [2',2-azinobis (3-ethylbenzthiazol-6-sulfonic acid) [ABTS]) in citrate buffer (pH 4.0). After a 10-min incubation, the absorbance was read at 414 nm by using a Titertek Multiscan MCC MKII plate reader (Labsystem, Helsinki, Finland).
Classification of MAbs by competitive ELISA. Topographical epitope mapping of the RV P protein was performed by competitive binding assays (7, 8) which employed both unlabeled MAbs (as cell culture supernatant) and biotin-labeled (10) versions of MAbs purified from mouse ascitic fluids. Each biotinylated MAb was titrated against purified GST-P protein to determine the optimal volume required. For competitive ELISAs (cELISAs), equal volumes of unlabeled MAb and appropriately diluted biotinylated MAb were allowed to compete for antigen binding for 1 h at room temperature. After five washes with PBST, streptavidin-HRP conjugate (Kirkegaard and Perry Laboratories Gaithersburg, Md.), diluted 1:1,500 in PBST, was applied and incubated for 1 h at room temperature. After another wash with PBST, ABTS solution was added, and absorbances at 414 nm were read after 10 min. The results were expressed as the mean percent inhibition observed for the unlabeled MAb compared to control wells containing diluent in the place of hybridoma supernatant.
Epitope mapping by cELISA with synthetic peptides. Synthetic peptides were obtained from Southwest Scientific Resources (Alberquerque, N.Mex.). The sequences were as follows: PVEP1, N'-CSTQTTGRELKKETTS-C'; PVEP2, N'-CGRELKKETTSISSQRD-C'; and PVEP3, N'-CKKETTSISSQRDSQSSKA-C'; the N-terminal cys residue had been included to allow conjugation to a carrier protein if required. These peptides, which correspond to residues 145 to 159 (PVEP1), 150 to 165 (PVEP2), and 154 to 171 (PVEP3), respectively, of the RV (arctic fox strain) P protein were employed in a cELISA in which various amounts of peptides (1 ng to 20 µg) were used in place of labeled MAbs. Primary antibody binding was visualized by using HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG and ABTS chromogen as described for indirect ELISA.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Generation of a series of antiphosphoprotein MAbs. IPTG induction of E. coli cells transformed with vector pGEX-RabP (see Materials and Methods) resulted in high-level expression of a 55-kDa protein; this size was close to the expected value for the GST-P fusion product of 59.7 kDa. Furthermore, this 55-kDa product, but not the 27-kDa GST protein produced in cells transformed with the pGEX-3X plasmid, was reactive against an anti-P MAb (16AD8) generated previously from the inoculation of mice with whole-virus preparations of the HEP RV laboratory strain (data not shown). These findings confirmed the authenticity of the fusion product. Mice were inoculated with preparations of the GST-P protein and subsequently used for hybridoma generation as described above. Hybridoma screening yielded several independent IgG class anti-P MAbs, of which 27 have been extensively characterized here.
Anti-P MAb classification by a competitive binding assay.
cELISAs were performed with all 27 anti-P MAbs and with biotin-labeled
versions of 7 of them. The MAbs were grouped according to the magnitude
of their reciprocal inhibition, with values of >80% indicating that
the two antibodies are either directed against the same epitope or
that the epitopes are spatially close to each other within the same
antigenic site. The percent inhibition results shown in Table
1 clearly divide the epitopes
represented by the 27 MAbs into four antigenic sites. Some overlap is
observed between sites I and III, but sites II and IV appear to be
discrete and nonoverlapping. MAbs were distributed fairly evenly among
these four groups (eight in I, six in II, eight in III, and five in IV). Complete inhibition of M960 by group II MAbs was not observed. M960 could not be efficiently labeled with biotin; therefore, complete
saturation of the antigenic sites with biotinylated M960 was never
possible.
|
Mapping of linear epitopes recognized by anti-P MAbs. Two series of nested P gene deletions were generated and employed to express a total of 16 His6-tagged P products, of which 8 were C-terminally truncated and 8 were N-terminally truncated. Proteins smaller than the 11.2-kDa product, P1-66, did not accumulate to any measurable level and could not, therefore, be included in the study. All truncated proteins migrated through SDS-polyacrylamide gels with observed sizes close to, but slightly larger than, those predicted; this was possibly due to the positive charge provided by the His6 tag.
Preliminary studies demonstrated that three of the anti-P MAbs (M951, M955, and M978) did not react to the full-length P protein or to several of the truncated products on Western analysis; it is likely that these MAbs recognize conformational epitopes. The remaining 24 MAbs were assessed for their reactivity against all truncated P proteins. Table 2 presents the reactivity patterns observed for representatives of all MAb groups, and representative blots are shown in Fig. 1. Table 3 summarizes the location of each epitope site for all MAbs that could be analyzed in this manner. While the epitopes recognized by MAbs of groups I and III were all located close to amino acids 37 to 66 and could not thus be distinguished by this method, in other respects these mapping data closely matched the classification scheme presented in Table 1. The epitope site for group II MAbs appeared to be localized within residues 145 to 165 (but see below), while group IV MAbs bound to a region encompassing amino acids 82 to 140, with one MAb of this group (M969) mapped more precisely (residues 82 to 113).
|
|
|
Assessment of the reactivity of all anti-P MAbs against a variety
of lyssaviruses.
MAbs representative of all four groups were
assessed by IFA for their reactivities to a variety of RV strains and
to several lyssaviruses of other genotypes. Table
4 summarizes a representative selection
of these data. Clearly, the group I MAbs are broadly cross-reactive
with all lyssavirus P proteins, including those of the most divergent
lyssaviruses LBV and MOKV, while the group IV MAbs were reactive with
most isolates except for MOKV, LBV, DUV, and EBL-1. Group III MAbs
reacted against most street (wild-type) RVs but exhibited greater
variability in their reaction with laboratory strains of RV and other
lyssavirus serotypes. The most striking pattern was displayed by group
II MAbs, which, as expected, generally reacted strongly with the arctic
fox RV strain used for their generation but not to any other lyssavirus
isolate. Notably, none of these MAbs reacted substantially to the two
nonlyssavirus rhabdoviruses (Adelaide and Manitoba viruses) included in
the study.
|
Use of synthetic peptides to further delineate the epitope site
of group II MAbs.
Three synthetic peptides denoted PVEP (P
variable epitope) bearing overlapping sequences corresponding to P
protein residues 145 to 159 (PVEP1), 150 to 165 (PVEP2), and 154 to 171 (PVEP3) were evaluated for their ability to inhibit MAb binding to the complete P antigen in a cELISA. Five MAbs were selected for testing in
this assay: M972, a member of group III, and M963, a representative of
group IV, were used as negative controls, while M958, M960, and M977
were representative of group II. The only peptide which interfered with
binding of all group II MAbs but not to M972 and M963 was PVEP3 (Fig.
2A). Although the efficiency of this
inhibitory effect apparently differed slightly between the group II
MAbs, complete inhibition was achieved in each case at a peptide
concentration of 10 µg/ml. In contrast, over the peptide
concentration range tested, PVEP2 was able to inhibit M960 only (Fig.
2B) and with far less efficiency than PVEP3, indicating that PVEP2 most
likely lacked a complete epitope site and hence competed poorly
with the antigen for MAb binding. PVEP1 did not inhibit antigen binding by any of the five MAbs tested (data not shown). The observation that
the binding of MAbs M972 and M963 to P antigen was unaffected by the
presence of any of the three peptides was consistent with previous data
mapping the positions of their epitopes elsewhere in the protein.
These analyses suggest that residues 154 to 171 contain the epitope
site for group II MAbs and that, interestingly, this site is not
completely retained within residues 150 to 165.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The RV P protein, which is functionally analogous to its vesicular stomatitis virus P counterpart, is an RNA polymerase cofactor which binds to both the L and N viral proteins. The domains responsible for these interactions have been examined; N binding requires two distinct N- and C-terminal P protein domains (3, 9), while interaction with the L protein was mapped more precisely to the first 19 amino acids of P (4). This functional requirement of the P N terminus may place considerable constraints on variation in this region of the protein and, indeed, the first 50 amino acids are the most conserved of the entire P protein (S. A. Nadin-Davis, manuscript in preparation). The physically close antigenic sites I and III identified by cELISA, which were mapped to amino acids 37 to 66, overlap this conserved region. While linear epitope mapping could not distinguish these two sites, the differential reactivities of group III MAbs to certain lyssaviruses suggest their target more precisely. For example, of the five ABL isolates examined, group III MAbs reacted weakly or variably with four of them, whereas most were unreactive to the human isolate (ABL-V), which has been noted as segregating distinctly by phylogenetic analysis (Nadin-Davis et al., in preparation). Comparison of the first 66 amino acids of the five ABL P proteins indicated identity over the first 49 residues but differences at several positions between residues 50 and 66. It is therefore likely that group III MAbs recognize a site which includes the less-conserved amino acids downstream of residue 50. Further support for this conclusion was provided by a variant isolate of the Western Canada skunk strain (SK:WCANADA-V [see Table 4]) which, in contrast to other isolates of this strain (SK:WCANADA), was unreactive with all group III MAbs. Sequence comparison of the normal and variant isolates of this strain over the first 66 codons revealed a single coding change; the conserved Met53 was replaced by Thr in the variant form (data not shown). This observation indicates the important contribution of residue 53 to the binding of group III MAbs. In contrast, since group I MAbs bind to a strictly conserved lyssavirus sequence, this site is most likely contained within residues 37 to 50.
Group II MAbs, in contrast, exhibited a very high degree of strain specificity, which can be explained by their binding to a site contained within a highly variable central region (Nadin-Davis et al., in preparation). While the nested protein deletions had suggested this site was contained within residues 145 to 165, cELISA using synthetic peptides located the site at residues 154 to 171. A possible explanation for this discrepancy between the two methods may be considered. The native P protein encodes a serine at position 168; a serine residue, encoded by vector cloning junction sequence, is retained in this position within the truncated P1-165 product. We speculate that Ser168 is an important component of antigenic site II and that the fortuitous retention of this residue in P1-165 facilitates MAb binding. From a combination of all of the data, it can be inferred that site II is probably contained within residues 154 to 168. However, the differential reactivity of peptide PVEP2 with M960, M958, and M977 suggests that the residues involved differ slightly for individual MAbs. Indeed, M960 is also distinguishable from the M958 and M977 MAbs by its ability to bind, in Western analysis, the P protein of the ONT T2 RV variant (unpublished data), which, within the variable epitope, differs from the ONT T1 variant protein used throughout these studies by a single substitution, i.e., Ile160 (T1) versus Val160 (T2). Since M958 and M977 are unreactive to the T2 variant protein as seen by Western analysis (data not shown), Ile160 is clearly implicated as an essential component of their epitopes. These MAbs may therefore facilitate antigenic discrimination of these two Ontario virus variants, which, to date, have been distinguished only by genetic methods (17). Indeed, the failure of M977 to recognize some isolates of the arctic fox strain by IFA (see Table 4) might be an indication of this discriminatory capability, although the variant nature of the viral isolates employed in these studies was not examined.
Comparison of the hydrophilicity profiles of the central variable region of lyssavirus phosphoproteins shows that despite the divergent nature of its primary sequence this domain is highly hydrophilic and has a high probability for exposure on the protein surface, a finding consistent with its highly immunogenic properties. Again by analogy to the VSV P product (see reference 1), it is hypothesized that this variable central region may act as a molecular hinge by which the N and L binding domains on opposite ends of the molecule may interact. This linker function may explain the relative lack of sequence constraints apparently operating on this domain.
Three MAbs generated in these studies
M951, M955, and M978
were
deemed to bind conformational epitopes based on their nonreactivity with P protein by immunoblotting. These same three MAbs gave reduced levels of inhibition in competitive binding assays but were
nevertheless placed into groups III, IV, and I, respectively. These
conformational epitopes may physically overlap the linear
epitopes represented by the other MAbs and hence explain their lack
of ability to fully inhibit binding of the labeled MAbs. The nature of
these conformational epitopes could be more fully understood by
carrying out two-way competitive binding assays.
There has been one other report describing the generation of a panel of anti-P MAbs using recombinant P protein generated from the PV laboratory RV strain (20). The sites bound by these MAbs were also examined, and the results can be summarized as follows: of 36 MAbs examined in detail, 3 mapped to the first 19 N-terminal residues, 7 bound to a region defined by residues 20 to 82, 21 bound to an antigenic site located in amino acids 83 to 172, and 5 reacted with residues 177 to 297 at the C terminus. In many respects these results are in accord with ours except that Raux et al. (20) did obtain MAbs directed to the phosphoprotein C terminus; our panel lacked MAbs targeting this region (residues 170 to 297). It appears that, at least in the GST-P fusion product, this area was poorly antigenic. Since Raux et al. employed a His6-tagged protein for MAb generation, it is possible that the different affinity tags employed influenced the presentation of the C-terminal portion of the protein to the mouse immune system. Apart from documenting differential reactivities of certain of these MAbs with the PV and CVS rabies strains, the discriminatory potential of the MAb panel of Raux et al. was not explored (20).
The MAb panel described here has excellent potential utility for lyssavirus strain identification and classification. The broadly cross-reactive MAbs (group I) apparently identify all members of this genus, group IV MAbs recognize the phylogenetically most closely related lyssaviruses (genotypes 1, 6, and 7), while several group III MAbs were reactive to isolates of genotypes 2 and 4, poorly reactive to viruses of genotypes 5 and 7, and unreactive to genotype 3 isolates. Additional anti-P MAbs which recognize genotype 3 isolates have recently been generated (unpublished data), and these will be highly complementary to this MAb panel. The availability of all of these MAbs, especially to laboratories examining Old World isolates, would allow their further evaluation with additional field isolates and may eventually facilitate epidemiological investigations into the prevalence of nonrabies lyssaviruses. The highly strain-specific group II MAbs described here are of clear value in detailed epidemiological studies of rabies in areas in which the arctic fox strain cocirculates with strains in other host reservoirs, e.g., insectivorous bats and raccoons. Moreover, the generation of additional strain-specific MAbs may be entertained through the immunological presentation of this variable antigenic site using either recombinant P protein fragments or synthetic peptides. If successful, this would allow relatively rapid production of additional highly specific tools for the surveillance of areas invaded by multiple, spatially overlapping rabies enzootics. These highly specific reagents could be more advantageous than the large anti-N MAbs now in current use. Finally, the delineation of the binding sites of these MAbs makes them valuable tools for future structure-function analyses of the P protein.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported in part by a contract from the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources.
We thank W. Huang for excellent technical support and C. Elmgren for expert assistance in hybridoma production and generation of the anti-P MAbs.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Rabies Centre of Expertise, Animal Diseases Research Institute, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, 3851 Fallowfield Rd., Nepean, Ontario K2H 8P9, Canada. Phone: (613) 228-6698. Fax: (613) 228-6669. E-mail: nadindaviss{at}em.agr.ca.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Banerjee, A. K., and S. Barik. 1992. Gene expression of vesicular stomatitis virus genome RNA. Virology 188:417-428[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 2. | Bourhy, H., K. Bachir, and N. Tordo. 1993. Molecular diversity of the Lyssavirus genus. Virology 194:70-81[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 3. |
Chenik, M.,
K. Chebli,
Y. Gaudin, and D. Blondel.
1994.
In vivo interaction of rabies virus phosphoprotein (P) and nucleoprotein (N): existence of two N-binding sites on P protein.
J. Gen. Virol.
75:2889-2896 |
| 4. |
Chenik, M.,
M. Schnell,
K. K. Conzelmann, and D. Blondel.
1998.
Mapping the interacting domains between the rabies virus polymerase and phosphoprotein.
J. Virol.
72:1925-1930 |
| 5. | Conzelmann, K., J. H. Cox, L. G. Schneider, and H. Thiel. 1990. Molecular cloning and complete nucleotide sequence of the attenuated rabies virus SAD B19. Virology 175:485-499[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 6. | Dean, D. J., M. K. Ableseth, and P. Atanasiu. 1996. The fluorescent antibody test, p. 88-95. In F. X. Meslin, M. M. Kaplan, and H. Koprowski (ed.), Laboratory techniques in rabies, 4th ed. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. |
| 7. | Elmgren, L. D., and A. I. Wandeler. 1996. Competitive ELISA for the detection of rabies virus neutralizing antibodies, p. 200-208. In F.-X. Meslin, M. M. Kaplan, and H. Koprowski (ed.), Laboratory techniques in rabies, 4th ed. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. |
| 8. | Elmgren, L. D. 1999. Epitope mapping of lyssavirus structural proteins. Ph.D. thesis. School of Graduate Studies and Research, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. |
| 9. | Fu, Z. F., Y. Zheng, W. H. Wunner, H. Koprowski, and B. Dietzschold. 1994. Both the N- and the C-terminal domains of the nominal phosphoprotein of rabies virus are involved in binding to the nucleoprotein. Virology 200:590-597[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 10. | Goding, J. W. 1986. Monoclonal antibodies: principles and practice, 2nd ed. Academic Press, Inc., London, England. |
| 11. | Gould, A. R., A. D. Hyatt, R. Lunt, J. A. Kattenbelt, S. Hengstberger, and S. D. Blacksell. 1998. Characterisation of a novel lyssavirus isolated from Pteropid bats in Australia. Virus Res. 54:165-187[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 12. | Harlow, E., and D. Lane. 1988. Immunoblotting, p. 471-510. In Antibodies: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. |
| 13. | Henikoff, S. 1984. Unidirectional digestion with exonuclease III creates targeted breakpoints for DNA sequencing. Gene 28:351-359[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 14. | Kissi, B., N. Tordo, and H. Bourhy. 1995. Genetic polymorphism in the rabies virus nucleoprotein gene. Virology 209:526-537[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 15. | Lafon, M. 1996. Techniques for the production, screening and characterisation of monoclonal antibodies, p. 133-144. In F. X. Meslin, M. M. Kaplan, and H. Koprowski (ed.), Laboratory techniques in rabies, 4th ed. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. |
| 16. | Nadin-Davis, S. A. 1998. Polymerase chain reaction protocols for rabies virus discrimination. J. Virol. Methods 75:1-8[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 17. |
Nadin-Davis, S. A.,
G. A. Casey, and A. Wandeler.
1993.
Identification of regional variants of the rabies virus within the Canadian province of Ontario.
J. Gen. Virol.
74:829-837 |
| 18. | Nadin-Davis, S. A., W. Huang, and A. I. Wandeler. 1997. Polymorphism of rabies viruses within the phosphoprotein and matrix protein genes. Arch. Virol. 142:1-14[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 19. | Poch, O., N. Tordo, and G. Keith. 1988. Sequence of the 3386 3' nucleotides of the genome of the AVO1 strain rabies virus: structural similarities in the protein regions involved in transcription. Biochimie 70:1019-1029[Medline]. |
| 20. | Raux, H., F. Iseni, F. Lafay, and D. Blondel. 1997. Mapping of monoclonal antibody epitopes of the rabies virus P protein. J. Gen. Virol. 78:119-124[Abstract]. |
| 21. | Rupprecht, C. E., B. Dietzschold, W. H. Wunner, and H. Koprowski. 1991. Antigenic relationships of lyssaviruses, p. 69-100. In G. M. Baer (ed.), The natural history of rabies, 2nd ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla. |
| 22. | Smith, J. S., and A. A. King. 1996. Monoclonal antibodies for the identification of rabies and non-rabies lyssaviruses, p. 145-156. In F. X. Meslin, M. M. Kaplan, and H. Koprowski (ed.), Laboratory techniques in rabies, 4th ed. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. |
| 23. | Smith, J. S., L. A. Orciari, P. A. Yager, H. D. Seidel, and C. K. Warner. 1992. Epidemiologic and historical relationships among 87 rabies virus isolates as determined by limited sequence analysis. J. Infect. Dis. 166:296-307[Medline]. |
| 24. | Tordo, N. 1996. Characteristics and molecular biology of the rabies virus, p. 28-51. In F. X. Meslin, M. M. Kaplan, and H. Koprowski (ed.), Laboratory techniques in rabies, 4th ed. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. |
| 25. | Tordo, N., and A. Kouknetzoff. 1993. The rabies virus genome: an overview. Onderstepoort J. Vet. Res. 60:263-269[Medline]. |
| 26. | Tordo, N., H. Badrane, H. Bourhy, and D. Sacramento. 1993. Molecular epidemiology of Lyssaviruses: focus on the glycoprotein and pseudogenes. Onderstepoort J. Vet. Res. 60:315-323[Medline]. |
| 27. |
Tordo, N.,
O. Poch,
A. Ermine,
G. Keith, and F. Rougeon.
1986.
Walking along the rabies genome: is the large G-L intergenic region a remnant gene?
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
83:3914-3918 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»