Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2000, p. 1449-1452, Vol. 38, No. 4
0095-1137/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Analysis of Plasmid and Chromosomal DNA of
Multidrug-Resistant Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhi
from Asia
S.
Mirza,1,2
S.
Kariuki,1,3
K. Z.
Mamun,1,4
N. J.
Beeching,5 and
C.
A.
Hart1,*
Departments of Medical Microbiology and
Genitourinary Medicine1 and School of
Tropical Medicine,5 University of Liverpool,
Liverpool L69 3GA, United Kingdom; Armed Forces Institute of
Pathology, Rawalpindi, Pakistan2;
Centre for Microbiology Research, Kenya Medical Research
Institute, Nairobi, Kenya3; and
Dhaka Medical College, Dhaka,
Bangladesh4
Received 23 August 1999/Returned for modification 26 November
1999/Accepted 23 January 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Molecular analysis of chromosomal DNA from 193 multidrug-resistant
(MDR) Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi isolates from 1990 to 1995 from Pakistan, Kuwait, Malaysia, Bangladesh, and India produced
a total of five major different pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE)
patterns. Even within a particular country MDR S. enterica serovar Typhi DNA was found to be in different PFGE groups. Similar self-transferable 98-MDa plasmids belonging to either incompatibility group incHI1 or incHI1/FIIA were implicated in the MDR phenotype in
S. enterica serovar Typhi isolates from all the locations
except Quetta, Pakistan, where the majority were of incFIA. A total of five different PFGE genotypes with six different plasmids, based on
incompatibility and restriction endonuclease analysis groups, were
found among these MDR S. enterica serovar Typhi isolates.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
It is estimated that each year there
are over 20 million cases of typhoid fever, which result in 700,000 deaths worldwide (25). In developed countries, the incidence
of cases and death has been greatly decreased by a combination of
improved sanitation and hygiene, vaccines, and effective antimicrobial
chemotherapy. The first two are difficult if not impossible to
implement in many developing countries, and, unfortunately, the
effectiveness of antimicrobial chemotherapy is also being eroded by the
emergence of antibiotic resistance (5, 16, 27). In
developing countries, the antibiotics most readily available for
treatment of typhoid are chloramphenicol, ampicillin, and
co-trimoxazole. Plasmid-encoded chloramphenicol resistance emerged
first in the early 1970s (2), followed by large epidemics in
Central America (20). Although slightly less effective than
chloramphenicol, ampicillin was used both for therapy and for
elimination of the carrier state (22). Again,
plasmid-encoded resistance soon developed (1, 20). Finally,
co-trimoxazole was introduced in 1980, and plasmid-encoded resistance
to trimethoprim and sulfonamides was observed shortly afterwards
(7). The first cases of typhoid due to Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi carrying plasmid-encoded resistance to chloramphenicol, ampicillin, and co-trimoxazole were reported from
southeast Asia (14). Cases in the area increased
exponentially, and it is possible to define an epidemic zone for
multidrug-resistant (MDR) S. enterica serovar Typhi which
encompasses China, southeast Asia, and the Indian subcontinent
(16). There is also a potential epidemic zone in the Middle
East (Kuwait, Oman, and Saudi Arabia) due to importation of MDR
S. enterica serovar Typhi by migrant workers from the
epidemic zone. Interestingly MDR S. enterica serovar Typhi
is rarely, if at all, reported from Africa or South and Central
America, where some of the early epidemics of chloramphenicol-resistant typhoid were first reported (2, 20). We investigated the antimicrobial susceptibility and the genetic basis of resistance of MDR
S. enterica serovar Typhi isolates from various countries in
Asia and the Middle East. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was
used to study the genotypic relationship among the isolates.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Bacterial isolates.
A total of 193 MDR S. enterica serovar Typhi isolates obtained from 1990 to 1995 were
studied; 149 isolates were from patients from Rawalpindi and Quetta,
Pakistan, 30 were from Bangladesh, 6 were from Kuwait, 6 were from
Malaysia, and 2 were from India. The identity of S. enterica
serovar Typhi isolates was confirmed using biochemical tests on
Analytab Products strips (bioMerieux, Basingstoke, United Kingdom), and
they were serotyped using agglutinating antisera (Murex Diagnostics,
Dartford, United Kingdom). Isolates were stored at
70°C on Protect
beads (Technical Service Consultants Ltd., Heywood, United Kingdom)
until analyzed.
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
S. enterica
serovar Typhi isolates were tested for susceptibility to antimicrobials
by a controlled disk diffusion technique according to the guidelines
provided by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards
(18) on diagnostic sensitivity testing (DST) agar (Oxoid
Ltd., Basingstoke, United Kingdom) plates containing 5% lysed horse
blood. The antibiotic discs (all from Oxoid) contained ampicillin (10 µg), tetracycline (30 µg), co-trimoxazole (1.25 µg),
chloramphenicol (30 µg), streptomycin (30 µg), gentamicin (10 µg), amoxicillin (20 µg)-clavulanic acid (10 µg), ofloxacin (10 µg), ciprofloxacin (10 µg), and nalidixic acid (10 µg). MICs of
these antibiotics were determined using the E-test strips (AB BIODISK,
Solna, Sweden) following the manufacturer's instructions. Adjusted
inocula of bacteria (ca. 106 CFU/ml [ca. 0.5 MacFarland
standard]) were used on DST agar plates. Escherichia coli
ATCC 25922 (the MICs for which are known) was used as a control for
potency of antibiotics.
Beta-lactamase study.
Preparations of protein extracts from
S. enterica serovar Typhi isolates were made using the
method of Corkill et al. (6) and were analyzed by
isoelectric focusing on sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis gels (Pharmacia, St. Albans, United Kingdom). Ampholytes with pIs in the range of 3.5 to 9.5 were used to generate the pH gradient, and proteins of known pIs were included as controls, as were extracts from bacteria expressing TEM-1 and TEM-2.
PFGE of macrorestricted genomic DNA.
Chromosomal DNA from
S. enterica serovar Typhi isolates was prepared in agarose
plugs as described by Thong et al. (26). DNA in agarose
plugs was digested using 25 U of XbaI or 20 U of SpeI (Life Technologies, Paisley, United Kingdom). PFGE of
agarose plug inserts was then performed on a CHEF-DR II system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Richmond, Calif.) on a horizontal 1% agarose gel for
22 h at 120 V, with a pulse time of 1 to 40 s at 14°C. A
lambda DNA digest consisting of a ladder (ca. 22 fragments) of
increasing size from 48 kb to approximately 1,000 kb was included as a
DNA size standard. The gel was stained with ethidium bromide and
photographed on a UV transilluminator (UVP Inc., San Gabriel, Calif.).
The restriction endonuclease (RE) digest patterns were compared, and their similarities were scored by the method of Tenover et al. (24). By these criteria isolates that gave PFGE banding
patterns that were indistinguishable were assumed to be from a single
outbreak strain. Isolates that gave banding patterns showing
differences in fewer than four bands were assumed to be closely
related, as they may represent isolates differing by a single genetic
event. In addition, isolates with differences in four to six bands may also be part of an outbreak. However, isolates showing a difference in
more than seven bands of their banding patterns may represent more than
three genetic events, in which case they were considered epidemiologically unrelated.
Conjugation of plasmids and incompatibility grouping.
Conjugation experiments were carried out in broth using the method of
Walia et al. (28) with E. coli K-12
(Nalr Lac+) as the recipient. All S. enterica serovar Typhi isolates were susceptible to nalidixic
acid. Transconjugants were selected on MacConkey agar (Oxoid)
supplemented with nalidixic acid (32 mg/l each) and ampicillin or
chloramphenicol (32 mg/l each). Plasmid DNA was then extracted from the
transconjugants using an alkaline lysis method (3). Plasmids
were electrophoresed on horizontal 0.8% agarose gels and stained with
0.05% ethidium bromide (Sigma, Poole, United Kingdom). DNA bands were
then visualized using a UV transilluminator (UVP).
Incompatibility grouping was performed on plasmids extracted from
E. coli K-12 transconjugants using DNA-DNA hybridization (15) on nitrocellulose membranes (Sigma). A total of eight
rep probes (incFII, incFI, incB/O, incHI1, incK, incN, incP, and incW) labeled with biotinylated UTP by nick translation were employed as
described previously (13). Probe-target hybridization was detected using a streptavidin-alkaline phosphatase conjugate and nitroblue tetrazolium and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolylphosphate for
visualization (Sigma).
Restriction endonuclease analysis (REA).
Plasmid DNA was
extracted from MDR S. enterica serovar Typhi transconjugants
as described previously (4) and subsequently was digested
using HindIII and EcoRI (Life Technologies)
according to the manufacturer's instructions. Restriction fragments
were resolved by agarose gel electrophoresis. HindIII
digests of lambda DNA were used as size standards.
 |
RESULTS |
Antimicrobial susceptibility.
A total of 193 MDR S. enterica serovar Typhi isolates were examined. All the isolates
were uniformly resistant to the five antimicrobial agents commonly
available in developing countries, namely, ampicillin, co-trimoxazole,
chloramphenicol, tetracycline, and streptomycin. However, they were all
sensitive to nalidixic acid, cefuroxime, cefotaxime, ciprofloxacin, and
ofloxacin. MICs of ampicillin, chloramphenicol, streptomycin, and
tetracycline were all >256 mg/l, and the MICs of co-trimoxazole were
16 to 32 mg/l. MICs of nalidixic acid ranged between 2 and 4 mg/l, and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid MICs ranged between 0.25 and 10 mg/l. Resistance in each case was associated with self-transferable 98-MDa plasmids.
Beta-lactamases.
On isoelectric focusing all the MDR S. enterica serovar Typhi isolates produced beta-lactamases with a pI
of 5.4 that cofocused with the control TEM-1 beta-lactamase. As these
isolates did not show resistance to the extended-spectrum beta-lactams,
no further analysis of their beta-lactamases was carried out.
Conjugation of resistance plasmids and incompatibility
grouping.
As shown in Table 1 121 of
the 193 (62.7%) MDR S. enterica serovar Typhi isolates from
the various countries transferred resistance to three or more
antimicrobials to E. coli K-12. For all the MDR S. enterica serovar Typhi isolates resistance was carried on 98-MDa
plasmids. Apart from S. enterica serovar Typhi isolates from
Quetta, Pakistan, which transferred three different resistance
phenotypes, all the isolates transferred the same resistance phenotype
in each case. The 98-MDa resistance plasmids fell into five different
incompatibility groups (Table 2). Apart
from resistance plasmids from Pakistan, which were in three different
incompatibility groups, the plasmids were either of incHI1 or incHI1
cross-reacting with incFIIA (incHI1/FIIA). The distribution of the
other plasmid incompatibility groups is shown in Table 2.
Interestingly, the predominance of incFIA plasmids among the S. enterica serovar Typhi isolates from Pakistan contrasts with the
general association between incHI1 plasmids and S. enterica
serovar Typhi worldwide.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1.
Patterns of antibiotic resistance transfer from MDR
S. enterica serovar Typhi isolates using ampicillin and
chloramphenicol for selection of transconjugant phenotypes
|
|
REA of resistance plasmids.
RE digestion of the 98-MDa
plasmids from MDR S. enterica serovar Typhi with
EcoRI or HindIII produced 7 to 12 fragments
ranging in size from 2 to 10 kb (Table
3). Two isolates from Quetta, Pakistan,
had distinct unique restriction digestion patterns. In order to improve
resolution, the plasmid DNA was digested with HindIII
and EcoRI together. There was better discrimination between strains following digestion with the two enzymes combined than with the
individual enzymes. As expected more DNA fragments (15 to 18) were
produced with the combined restriction enzyme digestion than with
digestion by the individual enzymes, and their sizes varied from less
than 2,000 to 10,000 bp (Table 3). With the combination of
HindIII and EcoRI, REA patterns for plasmids
from four of the five different countries (the exception being Pakistan [Rawalpindi and Quetta]) were similar (Table 3). REA of plasmids from
Quetta using HindIII and EcoRI, either alone
or in combination, gave two distinct patterns; these plasmids were
clearly different from the plasmids from Rawalpindi, Pakistan, and from
the other four countries.
PFGE.
XbaI-digested DNA from S. enterica
serovar Typhi isolates from the five different countries produced a
total of five different patterns consisting of 13 to 22 fragments
ranging in size from ca. 23 to 730 kb. Figure
1 shows the PFGE banding patterns of representative MDR S. enterica serovar Typhi isolates from
various countries. The 30 MDR S. enterica serovar Typhi
isolates from Bangladesh all produced the same PFGE fragment pattern
(designated subgroup C1 in Table 3). This pattern was closely related
to the PFGE patterns for the isolates from India (C2) and Kuwait (C3).
The Malaysian isolates produced one pattern (D) that was distinct from
all the other isolates and one (E) that was also found in eight
isolates from Quetta, Pakistan. The MDR S. enterica serovar
Typhi isolates from Rawalpindi, Pakistan, fell into two groups (A and
B), and the majority of the isolates from Quetta, Pakistan, fell into
these two groups, which were not detected among isolates from any of
the other regions. As with the XbaI-digested DNA, the
SpeI-digested DNA fragment pattern analysis resulted in
similar types and a similar distribution of digestion patterns of
S. enterica serovar Typhi isolates from the five countries and hence did not offer further discrimination among the S. enterica serovar Typhi isolates. However, SpeI
digestion produced more fragments (18 to 24), ranging in size from ca.
20 to 750 kb.

View larger version (99K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
XbaI RE fragment patterns of representative
S. enterica serovar Typhi isolates from various countries.
Lanes 1 and 19 (numbering is from left to right), 48.5-kb ladder
molecular size standard; lane 2, B1 from Bangladesh in PFGE group C1;
lane 3, I1 from India in PFGE group C2; lanes 4 and 5, K1 and K2,
respectively, from Kuwait in PFGE group C3; lanes 6, 7, 8, and 9, M1,
M2, M3, and M4 from Malaysia in PFGE groups D1, D2, D2, and E1,
respectively; lanes 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14, Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4, and Q5 from
Quetta, Pakistan, in PFGE groups E2, E1, B1, B2, and A1, respectively;
lanes 15, 16, 17, and 18, R1, R2, R3, and R4 from Rawalpindi, Pakistan,
in PFGE groups B1, A1, A1, and A2, respectively.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
In this study we have examined a total of 193 MDR isolates of
S. enterica serovar Typhi from five different countries in
Asia and the Middle East. Each was included because of resistance to chloramphenicol, ampicillin, and co-trimoxazole, and this resistance phenotype is predominant in many parts of the continent (9, 16,
19, 23, 27). The MICs of ampicillin, chloramphenicol, and
co-trimoxazole among our MDR S. enterica serovar Typhi
isolates are similar to those reported from India and Vietnam (23,
27). In each case ampicillin resistance was mediated by a
-lactamase with a pI of 5.4 that cofocused with TEM-1. This confirms
and extends findings from Vellore, India, which demonstrated that all
the MDR S. enterica serovar Typhi isolates examined
expressed TEM-1 (23). All our MDR S. enterica
serovar Typhi isolates were sensitive to cefuroxime and cefotaxime and,
unlike those from Vietnam and Tajikistan (17, 27), all were
sensitive to nalidixic acid, ciprofloxacin, and ofloxacin. This is of
particular importance since the fluoroquinolones ciprofloxacin and
ofloxacin are particularly valuable in the treatment of typhoid fever
whether due to MDR S. enterica serovar Typhi or not (3,
5, 12).
In each case antimicrobial resistance was transferable to E. coli K-12 on ca. 98-MDa plasmids. In previous studies the large (90- to 110-MDa) self-transmissible plasmids from MDR S. enterica serovar Typhi have invariably been of incompatibility
group IncHI1 (1, 10, 23). Although all of the tested
plasmids from the MDR S. enterica serovar Typhi isolates
from Bangladesh, Kuwait, India, and Rawalpindi, Pakistan, fell into
this or a cross-reacting incHI1/FIIA group, none of the plasmids from
the Quetta isolates did so. The majority of the Quetta plasmids were of
incFIA but two were of incP and one was of IncB/O, a distribution which
has not been reported previously. In addition one of five Malaysian plasmids was of incFIIA. RE digestion of the plasmids revealed a total
of five different patterns. The plasmids from the MDR S. enterica serovar Typhi isolates from Kuwait, Bangladesh, Malaysia, and India all produced the same pattern regardless of their
incompatibility groups and antibiotic resistances transferred. The
isolates from Rawalpindi all produced the same plasmid RE pattern,
which was different from all the others. Finally the isolates from
Quetta carried plasmids that fell into two different RE patterns that were also unique. Those of incFIA produced one pattern, and the rest
produced the other pattern. It is thus clear that the MDR phenotype in
the isolates from our study is encoded on a variety of different
plasmids, as determined by incompatibility group and REA. However, most
of the diversity arises in the isolates from Pakistan.
PFGE of macrorestricted chromosomal DNA from the MDR S. enterica serovar Typhi isolates produced five major patterns which differed from each other in more than seven bands. This was apparent when either XbaI or SpeI was used. Although until
recently it has been suggested that S. enterica serovar
Typhi represents a single clone with little interspecies divergence
(21), molecular analyses such as that by PFGE are
demonstrating much greater genetic heterogeneity among S. enterica serovar Typhi isolates (9, 23, 25, 26). It is
possible that some of the apparent genomic diversity could result from
homologous recombinations between rrn operons, as has been
observed in epidemiologically linked outbreaks in Spain (8).
It is unlikely that such events could account for all the diversity
detected in the present study and by others, especially in those
isolates that are not epidemiologically linked (8, 19, 21,
22). Previously PFGE analysis of S. enterica serovar
Typhi isolates from Vellore, India, has demonstrated that although
antibiotic-sensitive isolates showed great genomic variability, the MDR
S. enterica serovar Typhi constituted a single genotype
(23). Analysis of MDR S. enterica serovar Typhi
isolates from visitors to Canada (10) and from Bangladesh
(11) also demonstrated single genotypes. In the present
study two different PFGE patterns were detected in both Pakistan and
Malaysia. In contrast the isolates from India, Bangladesh, and Kuwait
produced identical patterns. Thus a total of five different genotypes
of MDR S. enterica serovar Typhi were detected.
Similarly, Hampton et al. (9) were able to detect
different genotypes among MDR S. enterica serovar Typhi
isolates originating from Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, and Tajikistan.
In conclusion, our study has demonstrated that there are at least five
different genotypes of MDR S. enterica serovar Typhi in
circulation in Asia. In addition it appears that there are at least six
different plasmids encoding the MDR phenotype based on a combination of
REA and incompatibility grouping. Clearly the MDR S. enterica serovar Typhi isolates that are circulating in Asia are
not derived from a single clone of S. enterica serovar Typhi
that has acquired one particular resistance plasmid.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENT |
We thank the Wellcome Trust for a grant to support this work.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Medical Microbiology and Genitourinary Medicine, University of
Liverpool, P.O. Box 147, Liverpool L69 3GA, United Kingdom. Phone:
0151-706 4381. Fax: 0151-706 5805. E-mail:
cahmm{at}liv.ac.uk.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Anderson, E. S.
1975.
Problems and implications of chloramphenicol resistance in the typhoid bacillus.
J. Hyg. Camb.
74:289-299[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Anderson, E. S., and H. R. Smith.
1972.
Chloramphenicol resistance in the typhoid bacillus.
Br. Med. J.
3:329-331.
|
| 3.
|
Arshad, A.,
S. Naseem, and A. Tasmin.
1992.
Enoxacin in the treatment of typhoid fever.
Clin. Ther.
14:825-828[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Birnboim, H. C., and J. Doly.
1979.
A rapid alkaline extraction procedure for screening recombinant plasmid DNA.
Nucleic Acids Res.
7:1513-1523[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Chandra, R.,
S. Srinivasan,
P. Nalini, and R. S. Rao.
1992.
Multidrug resistant enteric fever.
J. Trop. Med. Hyg.
95:284-287[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Corkill, J. E.,
C. A. Hart,
A. G. McLennan, and S. Aspinall.
1991.
Characterisation of a -lactamase from Pseudomonas paucimobilis.
J. Gen. Microbiol.
137:1425-1429[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Datta, N.,
H. Richards, and C. Datta.
1981.
Salmonella typhi in-vivo acquires resistance to both chloramphenicol and cotrimoxazole.
Lancet
i:1181-1183.
|
| 8.
|
Echeita, M. A., and M. A. Usera.
1998.
Chromosomal rearrangements in Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi affecting molecular typing in outbreak investigations.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
36:2123-2126[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Hampton, M. D.,
R. L. Ward,
B. Rowe, and E. J. Threlfall.
1998.
Molecular fingerprinting of multidrug-resistant Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi.
Emerg. Infect. Dis.
4:317-320[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Harnett, N.,
S. McLeod,
Y. AuYong,
J. Wan,
S. Alexander,
R. Khakhria, and C. Krishnan.
1998.
Molecular characterization of multiresistant strains of Salmonella typhi from South Asia isolated in Ontario, Canada.
Can. J. Microbiol.
44:356-363[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Hermans, P. W. M.,
S. K. Saha,
W. J. van Leeuwen,
H. A. Verbrugh,
A. van Belkum, and W. H. F. Goessens.
1996.
Molecular typing of Salmonella typhi strains from Dhaka (Bangladesh) and development of DNA probes identifying plasmid-encoded multidrug-resistant isolates.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
34:1373-1379[Abstract].
|
| 12.
|
Hien, T. T.,
D. B. Bethel,
N. T. T. Hoa,
J. Wain,
T. S. Diep,
L. T. Phi,
B. M. Cuong,
N. M. Duong,
P. T. Thanh,
A. L. Walsh,
N. P. J. Day, and N. J. White.
1994.
Short course of ofloxacin for treatment of multidrug-resistant typhoid.
Clin. Infect. Dis.
20:917-923.
|
| 13.
|
Kariuki, S.,
C. Gilks,
J. Corkill,
J. Kimari,
A. Benea,
P. G. Waiyaki, and C. A. Hart.
1996.
Multi-drug resistant non-typhi Salmonellae in Kenya.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
38:425-434[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Ling, J., and P. Y. Chau.
1984.
Plasmid mediating resistance to chloramphenicol, trimethoprim, and ampicillin in Salmonella typhi in the Southeast Asia region.
J. Infect. Dis.
149:652[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Meinkoth, J., and G. Wahl.
1984.
Hybridization of nucleic acids immobilized on solid supports.
Anal. Biochem.
138:267-284[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Mirza, S. H.,
N. J. Beeching, and C. A. Hart.
1995.
Multi-drug resistant typhoid: a global problem.
J. Med. Microbiol.
44:317-319.
|
| 17.
|
Murdoch, D. A.,
N. Banatvaia,
A. Bone,
B. I. Shoismatulloev,
L. R. Ward, and E. J. Threlfall.
1998.
Epidemic ciprofloxacin-resistant Salmonella typhi in Tajikistan.
Lancet
351:339[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 18.
|
National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards.
1997.
Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. Approved standard M7-A4, 4th ed.
National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
|
| 19.
|
Oh, H. M. L.,
Z. Masayu, and S. K. Chew.
1997.
Typhoid fever in hospitalized children in Singapore.
J. Infect.
34:237-242[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Olarte, J., and E. Galindo.
1973.
Salmonella typhi resistant to chloramphenicol, ampicillin and other antimicrobial agents: strains isolated during an extensive typhoid fever epidemic in Mexico.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
4:597-601[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Reeves, M. W.,
G. M. Evins,
A. A. Heiba,
B. D. Plikaytis, and J. J. Farmer, III.
1989.
Clonal nature of Salmonella typhi and its genetic relatedness to other salmonellae as shown by multilocus enzyme electrophoresis, and proposal of Salmonella bongori comb. nov.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
27:313-320[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Sanders, W. L.
1965.
Treatment of typhoid fevers: a comparative trial of ampicillin and chloramphenicol.
Br. Med. J.
2:1226-1229.
|
| 23.
|
Shanahan, P. M. A.,
M. V. Jesudason,
C. J. Thomson, and S. G. B. Amyes.
1998.
Molecular analysis of and identification of antibiotic resistance genes in clinical isolates of Salmonella typhi from India.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
36:1595-1600[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Tenover, F. C.,
R. D. Arbeit,
R. V. Goering,
P. A. Mickelsen,
B. E. Murray,
D. H. Persing, and B. Swaminathan.
1995.
Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
33:2233-2239[Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Thong, K. L.,
M. Y. Cheong,
S. Puthucheary,
C. L. Koh, and T. Pang.
1994.
Epidemiologic analysis of sporadic Salmonella typhi isolates and those from outbreaks by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
32:1135-1141[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Thong, K. L.,
Y. F. Ngeow,
P. N. Altwegg, and T. Pang.
1995.
Molecular analysis of Salmonella enteritidis by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and ribotyping.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
33:1070-1074[Abstract].
|
| 27.
|
Wain, J.,
N. T. Hoa,
N. T. Chinh,
H. Vinh,
M. J. Everett,
T. S. Diep,
N. P. Day,
T. Solomon,
N. J. White,
L. J. Piddock, and C. M. Parry.
1997.
Quinolone-resistant Salmonella typhi in Viet Nam: molecular basis of resistance and clinical response to treatment.
Clin. Infect. Dis.
25:1404-1410[Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Walia, S. K.,
T. Madhavan,
T. D. Chagh, and K. B. Sharma.
1987.
Characterization of self-transmissible plasmids determining lactose fermentation and multiple antibiotic resistance in clinical strains of Klebsiella pneumoniae.
Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.
7:279-284.
|
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2000, p. 1449-1452, Vol. 38, No. 4
0095-1137/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Phan, M.-D., Kidgell, C., Nair, S., Holt, K. E., Turner, A. K., Hinds, J., Butcher, P., Cooke, F. J., Thomson, N. R., Titball, R., Bhutta, Z. A., Hasan, R., Dougan, G., Wain, J.
(2009). Variation in Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhi IncHI1 Plasmids during the Global Spread of Resistant Typhoid Fever. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
53: 716-727
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
WEILL, F.-X., TRAN, H. H., ROUMAGNAC, P., FABRE, L., MINH, N. B., STAVNES, T. L., LASSEN, J., BJUNE, G., GRIMONT, P. A.D., GUERIN, P. J.
(2007). CLONAL RECONQUEST OF ANTIBIOTIC-SUSCEPTIBLE SALMONELLA ENTERICA SEROTYPE TYPHI IN SON LA PROVINCE, VIETNAM. Am J Trop Med Hyg
76: 1174-1181
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Dutta, S., Sur, D., Manna, B., Bhattacharya, S. K., Deen, J. L., Clemens, J. D.
(2005). Rollback of Salmonella enterica Serotype Typhi Resistance to Chloramphenicol and Other Antimicrobials in Kolkata, India. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
49: 1662-1663
[Full Text]
-
Kubota, K., Barrett, T. J., Ackers, M. L., Brachman, P. S., Mintz, E. D.
(2005). Analysis of Salmonella enterica Serotype Typhi Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis Patterns Associated with International Travel. J. Clin. Microbiol.
43: 1205-1209
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Le, T. A. H., Lejay-Collin, M., Grimont, P. A. D., Hoang, T. L., Nguyen, T. V., Grimont, F., Scavizzi, M. R.
(2004). Endemic, Epidemic Clone of Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhi Harboring a Single Multidrug-Resistant Plasmid in Vietnam between 1995 and 2002. J. Clin. Microbiol.
42: 3094-3099
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kariuki, S., Revathi, G., Muyodi, J., Mwituria, J., Munyalo, A., Mirza, S., Hart, C. A.
(2004). Characterization of Multidrug-Resistant Typhoid Outbreaks in Kenya. J. Clin. Microbiol.
42: 1477-1482
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Wain, J., Diem Nga, L. T., Kidgell, C., James, K., Fortune, S., Song Diep, T., Ali, T., O Gaora, P., Parry, C., Parkhill, J., Farrar, J., White, N. J., Dougan, G.
(2003). Molecular Analysis of incHI1 Antimicrobial Resistance Plasmids from Salmonella Serovar Typhi Strains Associated with Typhoid Fever. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
47: 2732-2739
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lawley, T. D., Taylor, D. E.
(2003). Characterization of the Double-Partitioning Modules of R27: Correlating Plasmid Stability with Plasmid Localization. J. Bacteriol.
185: 3060-3067
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ploy, M.-C., Chainier, D., Tran Thi, N. H., Poilane, I., Cruaud, P., Denis, F., Collignon, A., Lambert, T.
(2003). Integron-Associated Antibiotic Resistance in Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhi from Asia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
47: 1427-1429
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Parry, C. M., Hien, T. T., Dougan, G., White, N. J., Farrar, J. J.
(2002). Typhoid Fever. NEJM
347: 1770-1782
[Full Text]
-
Thong, K.-L., Goh, Y.-L., Yasin, R. M., Lau, M. G., Passey, M., Winston, G., Yoannes, M., Pang, T., Reeder, J. C.
(2002). Increasing Genetic Diversity of Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhi Isolates from Papua New Guinea over the Period from 1992 to 1999. J. Clin. Microbiol.
40: 4156-4160
[Abstract]
[Full Text]