Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2000, p. 1587-1591, Vol. 38, No. 4
0095-1137/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Evaluation of CHROMagar Staph. aureus, a New
Chromogenic Medium, for Isolation and Presumptive Identification of
Staphylococcus aureus from Human Clinical
Specimens
Olivier
Gaillot,*
Muriel
Wetsch,
Nicolas
Fortineau, and
Patrick
Berche
Laboratoire de Bactériologie-Virologie,
Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, Paris, France
Received 27 September 1999/Returned for modification 13 November
1999/Accepted 11 December 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
CHROMagar Staph. aureus (CSA) is a new chromogenic medium for
presumptive identification of Staphylococcus aureus as
mauve colonies after 24 h of incubation. We conducted a
preliminary study with 100 S. aureus and 45 coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CoNS) stock isolates
plated on CSA. All S. aureus isolates yielded mauve
colonies after 24 h of incubation at 37°C, while CoNS isolates grew as blue, white, or beige colonies. Culture on CSA was then prospectively compared to a conventional laboratory method, i.e., culture on 5% horse blood agar (HBA), catalase test, and latex agglutination test (HBA-catalase-latex), for isolation and presumptive identification of S. aureus from 2,000 consecutive clinical
samples. Among the 310 S. aureus isolates recovered by at
least one of the two methods, 296 grew as typical mauve colonies on
CSA, while only 254 yielded catalase-positive, latex-positive colonies
on HBA. The sensitivity of CSA was significantly higher than that of
the conventional method (95.5 and 81.9%, respectively;
P < 0.001) and allowed the recovery of important
clinical isolates that were undetected on blood agar. The specificities
of the two methods were not significantly different, although that of
CSA was slightly higher (99.4% versus 98.9% for HBA-catalase-latex; P = 0.08). On the basis of its excellent sensitivity
and specificity, ease of identification of positive colonies, and
absence of complementary testing, CSA can be recommended as a routine
plating medium for presumptive identification of S. aureus
in clinical specimens.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Staphylococcus aureus
remains one of the most frequently encountered bacterial pathogens and
is responsible for a variety of mild to life-threatening infections.
Early isolation and identification of S. aureus as an
etiologic agent or indicator of potential health risk is essential for
appropriate patient care. In the clinical laboratory routine, S. aureus is usually isolated on nonspecific media (e.g., blood agar)
and then presumptively identified before definitive overnight
characterization (11). Although immunoenzymatic and genetic
assays (3, 5, 9) are available, presumptive identification
of suspect colonies relies mostly on the detection of specific
determinants such as clumping factor, protein A, and specific capsular
antigens by agglutination of sensitized latex particles (7, 17,
19). However, this method becomes costly and time-consuming when
more than one suspect morphotype is present on a plate. In an attempt
to achieve isolation and presumptive identification in a single step,
specific selective culture media have been proposed for use to assist
in the detection of S. aureus (reviewed in reference
1). Mannitol-salt agar and related media (2, 4,
8) are widely used for specific screening of S. aureus
in potentially contaminated samples. They can be supplemented with
antibiotics in order to detect methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) isolates (13, 18). However, the average
sensitivity and specificity of mannitol-salt agar (10, 12,
15) do not qualify it for use for early isolation and presumptive
identification of S. aureus in all clinical specimens,
although supplementation with egg yolk was shown to be of clinical
interest (15). There is still a need for more specific media
that would retain the sensitivity of blood agar and allow single-step
isolation and presumptive identification of S. aureus.
CHROMagar Staph. aureus (CSA) is a new selective chromogenic medium
proposed for detection of S. aureus as mauve colonies after
18 to 24 h of incubation. In this study, we first evaluated with
145 clinical stock isolates the ability of CSA to differentiate
S. aureus from coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS),
which are frequently encountered in human clinical samples. Isolation
and presumptive identification of S. aureus on CSA were then
compared to our standard routine protocol, i.e., culture on 5% horse
blood agar (HBA), catalase test and latex agglutination for clumping
factor, protein A, and/or specific capsular antigens
(HBA-catalase-latex), with 2,000 consecutive clinical specimens in a
teaching hospital.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Culture media.
CSA, a proprietary product, was provided for
evaluation by CHROMagar Microbiology (Paris, France), as prepared 85-mm
plates containing 20 ml of opaque creamy-white medium. As indicated by the manufacturer, CSA plates were stored at 4°C in a cold room and
used within 4 weeks. Columbia agar supplemented with 5% horse blood
(HBA) was purchased as commercially prepared plates (Becton-Dickinson, Le Pont-de-Claix, France). In our facility, HBA was preferred to sheep
blood agar for general bacterial recovery because of its better
capacity to support the growth of Streptococcus
milleri-group streptococci and to grow Streptococcus
agalactiae as beta-hemolytic colonies. All plates were incubated
in air at 37°C. Brain heart infusion broth (bioMérieux,
Marcy-l'Étoile, France) was used for cultures in liquid medium.
Stock isolates.
The 145 stock Staphylococcus
strains representing 10 species (Table 1)
were isolated from clinical human samples in our facility, except for
two reference strains (S. aureus ATCC 25923 and
Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC 14990). Among the 100 S. aureus isolates, 26 were resistant to methicillin. One of
the MRSA isolates was a small-colony variant (auxotroph for thymidine)
and was unable to grow in less than 48 h on HBA. The isolates were
stored frozen at
80°C; for the present study, they were thawed,
seeded on blood agar, and incubated overnight at 37°C. Suspensions in
saline solution were prepared from freshly grown colonies and then
streaked onto CSA plates (one isolate per plate). At this stage, the
color and size of colonies were evaluated after 24 h of
incubation. In order to compare the output of cultures and the growth
limits of S. aureus on each medium, comparative colony
counts on HBA and CSA were performed for each S. aureus
isolate. Suspensions were prepared from freshly grown colonies in
saline solution and were adjusted to a turbidity equivalent to that of
a 0.5 McFarland unit standard suspension. Dilutions were made from
these suspensions, and 100 and 5 CFU of each isolate were inoculated
onto HBA and CSA plates by spreading 100 µl of each dilution.
Clinical samples.
The second arm of the study was carried
out between March and August 1999 in the 800-bed Necker Enfants-Malades
Hospital (Paris, France) on 2,000 consecutive clinical specimens of
various origins (Table 2). Midstream
urine and routine stool samples were excluded, for S. aureus
was unlikely to be isolated from such specimens. Plating on CSA was
added to our routine testing regimen, and a comparison of recovery for
each specimen was made. Samples were inoculated in a set order: routine
medium (HBA) first and then CSA. Primary inoculation was made with a
loop or a swab. A straight wire was then used to streak the material to
achieve isolated colonies. Quantitative cultures were performed on
bronchoalveolar lavage, protected bronchial brush, and central veinous
catheter (rinsed with 500 µl of saline solution) by spreading 100 µl of sample per plate. All plates were incubated at 37°C in air
and examined after 24 h of incubation. Incubation was occasionally prolonged to 48 h for HBA plates only, in order to enhance
differences between colony morphotypes.
Presumptive identification of S. aureus.
The criteria
for presumptive identification of S. aureus were defined as
follows: (i) on CSA, well-separated mauve colonies after 24 h of
incubation, without further testing, and (ii) on HBA, colonial
appearance after 24 to 48 h of incubation (11, 12) and
Gram stain morphology, positive catalase test (ID color Catalase;
bioMérieux), and positive agglutination for Pastorex Staph Plus
(Sanofi Diagnostics Pasteur, Marnes-la-Coquette, France), as previously
described (14). Pastorex Staph Plus allows simultaneous detection of clumping factor, protein A, and two S. aureus-specific capsular and was shown to identify most S. aureus isolates, including MRSA lacking clumping factor and/or
protein A (17). On HBA plates with mixed staphylococcal
flora, one colony of each suspected different morphotype was tested for
catalase and by latex agglutination. All plates were inspected by the
same technologist.
Confirmatory identification.
S. aureus identification
was confirmed by a positive tube-coagulase test, as previously
described (11). Colonies from primary recovery plates
presumptively identified as S. aureus were inoculated into
brain heart infusion broth and incubated overnight. The cultures were
then mixed with citrated rabbit plasma (bioMérieux) and incubated
at 37°C. Clotting was evaluated after 4 h, and after 24 h
if negative after 4 h. When required, staphylococci and micrococci were identified by the API ID32 STAPH system (bioMérieux) and in-house complementary tests based on conventional phenotypic characteristics (12).
Statistical analysis.
Differences in sensitivities,
specificities, and predictive values of the two methods were evaluated
by the Yates-corrected
2 test.
 |
RESULTS |
Colonial appearance of S. aureus and other
microorganisms on CSA.
We first evaluated the colonial appearance
of 145 Staphylococcus stock isolates on CSA. All 100 S. aureus isolates yielded mauve (positive) colonies, which
were usually 2 to 3 mm in diameter after 24 h of incubation (Fig.
1A). A mat halo surrounded the S. aureus colonies, analogous to that observed on Tween
80-supplemented media when lipase-producing bacteria are present.
Colonies of the small-colony variant MRSA were smaller (0.5 to 1 mm),
although they were clearly visible and mauve after 24 h. Colonies
of other MRSA and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus isolates
(n = 25 and 74, respectively) displayed no particular
difference in terms of size, shape, and color. Except for that of the
small-colony variant which did not grow on HBA after 24 h, the
colony counts performed on both media were identical (data not shown).
When CSA was challenged with low inocula (ca. 5 CFU/plate), its
capacity to detect S. aureus was similar to that of HBA. The
CoNS stock isolates tested grew as different shades of blue, white, or
beige colonies (Table 1), as did most CoNS isolated from clinical
specimens during the second part of the study. Figure
2 shows the comparative growth of a mixed
gram-positive flora on HBA and CSA after 24 h of incubation.
Several staphylococcal morphotypes are seen on HBA, each having
required catalase and latex tests, while mauve colonies readily
identified S. aureus on CSA. Several S. epidermidis isolates produced small white colonies with a mauve
background in regions of denser growth, not to be confused with the
actual color of individualized colonies. Micrococcus spp.
grew as yellow to brown colonies, except for five Micrococcus
luteus isolates which yielded mauve colonies (Fig. 1B). None of
the numerous gram-negative organisms isolated on HBA grew on CSA.
Enterococcus isolates yielded blue colonies, as did
Listeria monocytogenes. Diphtheroids grew on CSA as minute
white colonies, except for ANF group Corynebacterium isolates, which produced pinpoint-like red colonies that were barely
visible after 24 h. Candida albicans was the only yeast species recovered on CSA, as white colonies.

View larger version (140K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Colonial appearance of S. aureus and of two
false-positive isolates on CSA. Colonies were plated out from
suspensions of S. aureus (A), M. luteus (B), and
S. cohnii (C). CSA plates were incubated for 24 h at
37°C. Magnification, ×2.
|
|

View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Colonies plated out from a central venous catheter tip.
(Left) Columbia agar supplemented with 5% horse blood; (right) CSA.
Mauve colonies of S. aureus are readily differentiated from
three other morphotypes on the chromogenic medium; light blue, smaller
white, and larger white colonies were identified as
Staphylococcus haemolyticus, S. epidermidis, and
Staphylococcus warneri, respectively. Plates were incubated
for 24 h at 37°C and are shown at their actual size.
|
|
Recovery of S. aureus from clinical isolates.
During the second part of this work, the performances of CSA and
HBA-catalase-latex were compared in laboratory routine. A total of 310 S. aureus strains were isolated on at least one medium from
the 2,000 consecutive clinical specimens. All 310 isolates were
coagulase positive after 4 h, regardless of the medium from which
they had been isolated. The distribution of the isolates in the
different specimens is indicated in Table 2. On HBA, 254 isolates
yielded catalase-positive, latex-positive colonies and were confirmed
as S. aureus (sensitivity, 81.9%) (Table
3). A total of 1,157 latex agglutination
tests were performed, representing a mean of 4.55 tests for each
S. aureus isolate actually identified by the conventional
method. On CSA, 296 S. aureus isolates grew as typical mauve
colonies (sensitivity, 95.5%; P < 0.001). The majority (n = 53) of the 56 falsely negative isolates
missed on HBA but not on CSA were either masked or inhibited by a
gram-negative associated flora (n = 45) or were unable
to grow (n = 8) on primary plating, probably because of
a low inoculum. When subcultured from CSA to HBA, those 53 isolates
grew as typical staphylococcal colonies. The remaining three isolates
falsely negative on HBA were subcultured from CSA to HBA and yielded
latex-negative colonies. Among the 14 falsely negative isolates missed
on CSA but identified on HBA, 1 grew as blue-violet colonies
(suggesting the superposition of mauve and blue colors) and proved to
be coagulase positive. Six grew as creamy-white colonies with a mauve
background, and these isolates originated from mucoid sputa of patients
with cystic fibrosis. Subculture of such colonies on CSA restored
typical mauve morphotypes, which were then identified as S. aureus by a coagulase test. Seven isolates originated as scant
colonies on HBA, and no S. aureus growth was observed on the
corresponding CSA plates, but subculture from HBA to CSA yielded
typical mauve colonies.
Specificity of S. aureus presumptive
identification.
As shown in Table 4,
the specificities of both methods were high (98.9 and 99.4% for
HBA-catalase-latex and CSA, respectively) and not significantly
different (P = 0.08). A total of 18 and 8 false-positive strains were isolated on HBA and CSA, respectively. They
consisted of Staphylococcus lugdunensis (n = 5), Staphylococcus schleiferi (n = 4),
Staphylococcus cohnii (n = 4),
Staphylococcus saprophyticus (n = 3),
S. epidermidis (n = 1), and
Kocuria (formerly Micrococcus)
kristinae (n = 1) on HBA (catalase- and
latex-positive colonies). On CSA, false-positive isolates consisted of
M. luteus (n = 5) and S. cohnii
(n = 3). Falsely positive M. luteus colonies on CSA (Fig. 1B) were pink-mauve, convex, and smaller than typical S. aureus colonies (Fig. 1A) after 24 h of incubation,
and they lacked the mat halo observed around S. aureus
colonies. The three false-positive S. cohnii isolates
yielded violet colonies after 24 h (Fig. 1C), which in our opinion
were not different enough from typical mauve colonies of S. aureus and therefore were considered suspect. All colonies falsely
positive with the conventional method were subcultured on CSA, and none
of them grew as mauve colonies. Conversely, the three S. cohnii isolates falsely positive on CSA were also falsely positive
(latex-positive) on HBA. The five M. luteus isolates that
were mauve on CSA were latex negative when grown on HBA. The negative
predictive values (Table 4) of the two methods were significantly
different (96.8 and 99.2% for HBA-catalase-latex and CSA,
respectively; P < 0.001), demonstrating a better
capacity of CSA to exclude the presence of S. aureus in
clinical specimens.
 |
DISCUSSION |
The first stage of this study, performed with stock bacteria,
indicated the ability of CSA to grow a variety of clinical S. aureus isolates as typical positive colonies, including MRSA. Conversely, CoNS isolates, including species frequently encountered in
clinical specimens, did not yield positive colonies. The similar yields
of S. aureus from cultures on HBA and CSA demonstrated that
there was no inhibitory effect of CSA on the growth of S. aureus compared to HBA, even when the medium was challenged with very low inocula. The performance of CSA was then compared in routine
analysis of clinical specimens to our routine protocol (HBA-catalase-latex) for isolation and presumptive identification of
S. aureus. Good separation added to easy distinction of
mauve from blue or white colonies (Fig. 2) was of considerable help for
identification of suspect colonies. The difference in sensitivity observed between plating on CSA and the conventional method (Table 3)
appeared to result from the complete inhibition of gram-negative bacterial growth on CSA. This was demonstrated by the recovery on CSA
of 53 S. aureus isolates that were unable to grow on primary plating on HBA and were associated with abundant gram-negative flora,
especially Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia
coli. In such cases, the selectivity of CSA was an asset for the
recovery of several clinically important S. aureus isolates.
On HBA, only three S. aureus isolates were negative for the
Pastorex Staph Plus agglutination, confirming the excellent sensitivity
of this test, as previously reported (17, 19). Except for
one strain which yielded atypical blue-violet colonies, all S. aureus isolates grew as typical mauve colonies on CSA, either on
primary plating of clinical specimens (n = 296) or by
subculture of falsely negative isolates (n = 13).
Obstacles to the recovery of all isolates on primary plating on CSA
appeared to be related mainly to very low inocula, possibly due to the
set order of inoculation (first HBA and then CSA) and to the nature of
some sputum specimens from patients with cystic fibrosis. In this
setting, S. aureus colonies were atypical on primary
plating, although they were typically mauve when subcultured. We have
no explanation for this phenomenon and recommend that usage of CSA
should be further evaluated in the particular setting of cystic fibrosis.
In this study, both methods were shown to be highly specific. The 18 false positives with the conventional method included isolates of
clumping factor-producing staphylococci (S. lugdunensis and
S. schleiferi) and other CoNS known to occasionally show
falsely positive latex agglutination (6, 17). Only eight
false-positive isolates of infrequently isolated species (S. cohnii and M. luteus) grew on CSA. As the presence of a
mat halo around S. aureus colonies on CSA was not indicated
as discriminant by the manufacturer, we did not take it into account.
However, this characteristic could be of diagnostic interest, since
there was no halo around the M. luteus colonies as opposed
to S. aureus colonies. The white color and smaller size of
individualized colonies of S. epidermidis were clearly
distinct from the color and size positive colonies despite a mauve
background in the regions of dense, confluent growth. With a little
experience, the difference between isolates producing a mauve
background and those growing as mauve colonies was straightforward.
Still, we recommend that workers who are using CSA for the first time
include a mauve background-producing S. epidermidis isolate
(e.g., strain ATCC 14990) for comparison with S. aureus.
The excellent negative predictive value in the absence of mauve
colonies on CSA was particularly appreciated when screening for
S. aureus in specimens contaminated with skin flora, which often requires several catalase and latex tests with the conventional method (Fig. 2). This suggests that CSA supplemented with antibiotics could be an interesting alternative to selective media currently used
for screening of MRSA in hospitalized patients (13, 18, 16).
Our results indicate that primary plating on CSA provides a convenient
and time-saving method for the presumptive identification of S. aureus in routine clinical microbiology. Interpretation of colony
colors is easy and false positives are rare when the plates are
incubated for 24 h. The selectivity of CSA, resulting in the
absence of growth of gram-negative organisms, allows rate of recovery
of S. aureus higher than that with HBA, and definitive identification requires only a tube-coagulase or thermonuclease test.
Plating on CSA is an excellent alternative to conventional multistep
techniques presently used for the isolation and presumptive identification of S. aureus.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Alain Rambach and CHROMagar Microbiology for providing
us with the CHROMagar Staph. aureus medium. We are grateful to Claire
Poyart for the kind gift of strains and to Michel Simonet and Colin R. Tinsley for their helpful comments and critical reading of the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Laboratoire de
Bactériologie-Virologie, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades,
149, rue de Sèvres, 75730 Paris CEDEX 15, France. Phone: (33) (1)
44 49 49 61. Fax: (33) (1) 44 49 49 60. E-mail:
gaillot{at}necker.fr.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Baird, R. M., and W. H. Lee.
1995.
Media used in the detection and enumeration of Staphylococcus aureus.
Int. J. Food Microbiol.
26:15-24[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Blair, E. B., and J. S. Emerson.
1967.
A new medium, salt plasma agar, for the isolation of Staphylococcus aureus.
Am. J. Clin. Pathol.
47:30-39[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Brakstad, O. G.,
K. Aasbakk, and J. A. Maeland.
1992.
Detection of Staphylococcus aureus by polymerase chain reaction amplification of the nuc gene.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
30:1654-1660[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Chapman, G. H.
1945.
The significance of sodium chloride in studies of staphylococci.
J. Bacteriol.
50:201-203[Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Davis, T. E., and D. D. Fuller.
1991.
Direct identification of bacterial isolates in blood cultures by using a DNA probe.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
29:2193-2196[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Felten, A.,
E. Lepage, and P. Lagrange.
1995.
Critical analysis of tests for rapid detection of Staphylococcus aureus, Pastorex Staph plus, Slidex Staph-kit and Staph aureus in clinical isolates.
Pathol. Biol.
43:471-476[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Fournier, J. M.,
A. Bouvet,
D. Mathieu,
F. Nato,
A. Boutonnier,
R. Gerbal,
P. Brunengo,
C. Saulnier,
N. Sagot, and B. Slizewicz.
1993.
New latex reagent using monoclonal antibodies to capsular polysaccharide for reliable identification of both oxacillin-susceptible and oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
31:1342-1344[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Gunn, B. A.,
W. E. Dunkelberg, and J. R. Creitz.
1972.
Clinical evaluation of 2% LSM medium for primary isolation and identification of staphylococci.
Am. J. Clin. Pathol.
57:230-240.
|
| 9.
|
Guzmàn, C. A.,
M. C. Guardati,
D. Fenoglio,
G. Coratza,
C. Pruzzo, and G. Satta.
1992.
A novel immunoenzymatic assay for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus strains negative for coagulase and protein A.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
30:1194-1197[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Jones, E. M.,
K. E. Bowker,
R. Cooke,
R. J. Marshall,
D. S. Reeves, and A. P. MacGowan.
1997.
Salt tolerance of EMRSA-16 and its effect on the sensitivity of screening cultures.
J. Hosp. Infect.
35:59-62[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Kloos, W. E., and T. L. Bannermann.
1995.
Staphylococcus and Micrococcus, p. 282-298.
In
P. R. Murray, E. J. Baron, M. A. Pfaller, F. C. Tenover, and R. H. Yolken (ed.), Manual of clinical microbiology, 6th ed. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
|
| 12.
|
Koneman, E. W.,
S. D. Allen,
W. M. Janda,
P. C. Schreckenberger, and W. C. Winn, Jr.
1997.
Staphylococci and related organisms, p. 539-576.
In
E. W. Koneman, S. D. Allen, W. M. Janda, P. C. Schreckenberger, and W. C. Winn, Jr. (ed.), Color atlas and textbook of diagnostic microbiology, 5th ed. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, Pa.
|
| 13.
|
Lally, R. T.,
M. N. Ederer, and B. F. Woolfrey.
1985.
Evaluation of mannitol salt agar with oxacillin as a screening medium for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
22:501-504[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Luijendijk, A.,
A. van Belkum,
H. Verbrugh, and J. Kluytmans.
1996.
Comparison of five tests for identification of Staphylococcus aureus from clinical samples.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
34:2267-2269[Abstract].
|
| 15.
|
Merlino, J.,
R. Gill, and G. J. Robertson.
1996.
Application of lipovitellin-salt-mannitol agar for screening, isolation, and presumptive identification of Staphylococcus aureus in a teaching hospital.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
34:3012-3015[Abstract].
|
| 16.
|
Perry, P. L.,
G. W. Coombs,
J. D. Boehm, and J. W. Pearman.
1998.
A rapid (20 h) solid screening medium for detecting methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
J. Hosp. Infect.
40:67-72[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Personne, P.,
M. Bes,
G. Lina,
F. Vandenesch,
Y. Brun, and J. Etienne.
1997.
Comparative performances of six agglutination kits assessed by using typical and atypical strains of Staphylococcus aureus.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
35:1138-1140[Abstract].
|
| 18.
|
van Enk, R. A., and K. D. Thompson.
1992.
Use of a primary isolation medium for recovery of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
30:504-505[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Wilkerson, M.,
S. McAllister,
J. M. Miller,
B. J. Heiter, and P. P. Bourbeau.
1997.
Comparison of five agglutination tests for identification of Staphylococcus aureus.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
35:148-151[Abstract].
|
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2000, p. 1587-1591, Vol. 38, No. 4
0095-1137/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Glupczynski, Y., Berhin, C., Bauraing, C., Bogaerts, P.
(2007). Evaluation of a New Selective Chromogenic Agar Medium for Detection of Extended-Spectrum {beta}-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae. J. Clin. Microbiol.
45: 501-505
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Han, Z., Lautenbach, E., Fishman, N., Nachamkin, I.
(2007). Evaluation of mannitol salt agar, CHROMagar Staph aureus and CHROMagar MRSA for detection of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from nasal swab specimens. J Med Microbiol
56: 43-46
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Vinh, D. C., Nichol, K. A., Rand, F., Karlowsky, J. A.
(2006). Not So Pretty in Pink: Staphylococcus cohnii Masquerading as Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus on Chromogenic Media. J. Clin. Microbiol.
44: 4623-4624
[Full Text]
-
Shittu, A., Lin, J., Morrison, D., Kolawole, D.
(2006). Identification and molecular characterization of mannitol salt positive, coagulase-negative staphylococci from nasal samples of medical personnel and students.. J Med Microbiol
55: 317-324
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hedin, G., Fang, H.
(2005). Evaluation of Two New Chromogenic Media, CHROMagar MRSA and S. aureus ID, for Identifying Staphylococcus aureus and Screening Methicillin-Resistant S. aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol.
43: 4242-4244
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Holmes, A., Ganner, M., McGuane, S., Pitt, T. L., Cookson, B. D., Kearns, A. M.
(2005). Staphylococcus aureus Isolates Carrying Panton-Valentine Leucocidin Genes in England and Wales: Frequency, Characterization, and Association with Clinical Disease. J. Clin. Microbiol.
43: 2384-2390
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Diederen, B., van Duijn, I., van Belkum, A., Willemse, P., van Keulen, P., Kluytmans, J.
(2005). Performance of CHROMagar MRSA Medium for Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol.
43: 1925-1927
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kipp, F., Kahl, B. C., Becker, K., Baron, E. J., Proctor, R. A., Peters, G., von Eiff, C.
(2005). Evaluation of Two Chromogenic Agar Media for Recovery and Identification of Staphylococcus aureus Small-Colony Variants. J. Clin. Microbiol.
43: 1956-1959
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Perry, J. D., Davies, A., Butterworth, L. A., Hopley, A. L. J., Nicholson, A., Gould, F. K.
(2004). Development and Evaluation of a Chromogenic Agar Medium for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol.
42: 4519-4523
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Flayhart, D., Lema, C., Borek, A., Carroll, K. C.
(2004). Comparison of the BBL CHROMagar Staph aureus Agar Medium to Conventional Media for Detection of Staphylococcus aureus in Respiratory Samples. J. Clin. Microbiol.
42: 3566-3569
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Perry, J. D., Rennison, C., Butterworth, L. A., Hopley, A. L. J., Gould, F. K.
(2003). Evaluation of S. aureus ID, a New Chromogenic Agar Medium for Detection of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol.
41: 5695-5698
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kluytmans, J., Van Griethuysen, A., Willemse, P., Van Keulen, P.
(2002). Performance of CHROMagar Selective Medium and Oxacillin Resistance Screening Agar Base for Identifying Staphylococcus aureus and Detecting Methicillin Resistance. J. Clin. Microbiol.
40: 2480-2482
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Carricajo, A., Treny, A., Fonsale, N., Bes, M., Reverdy, M. E., Gille, Y., Aubert, G., Freydiere, A. M.
(2001). Performance of the Chromogenic Medium CHROMagar Staph Aureus and the Staphychrom Coagulase Test in the Detection and Identification of Staphylococcus aureus in Clinical Specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol.
39: 2581-2583
[Abstract]
[Full Text]