This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fujimoto, S.
Right arrow Articles by Blaser, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fujimoto, S.
Right arrow Articles by Blaser, M. J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2000, p. 1664-1667, Vol. 38, No. 4
0095-1137/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis Using Random Chromosomal Gene Probes for Epidemiological Analysis of Campylobacter jejuni Infections

Shuji Fujimoto,1,* Kenichi Umene,2 Mitsumasa Saito,3 Kazumi Horikawa,4 and Martin J. Blaser5

Infectious Diseases Laboratory, School of Health Science,1 and Department of Virology2 and Department of Bacteriology,3 Faculty of Medicine, Kyushu University, and Fukuoka Institute of Health and Environmental Sciences,4 Fukuoka, Japan, and Division of Infectious Diseases, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, and Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee5

Received 23 September 1999/Returned for modification 22 November 1999/Accepted 8 January 2000


    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

We have evaluated the ability of a new genotyping method for Campylobacter jejuni based on restriction fragment length polymorphisms using random chromosomal gene probes. DNAs from C. jejuni strains digested with each of three restriction enzymes, HhaI, HaeIII, and HpaII, were analyzed by Southern hybridization using each of two unrelated cosmid clones, P14 and P15 (respectively containing 30- and 35-kb genomic DNA fragments of C. jejuni strain OH4384). The method reported provides a stable and discriminating means for identifying C. jejuni strains and should be useful for epidemiological analyses.


    TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

Campylobacter jejuni is one of the most common causes of human bacterial gastroenteritis in the world. Since most C. jejuni infections are sporadic (1), their epidemiology must be clarified in order to design and implement effective intervention strategies. Since methods for high-resolution identification of strains are necessary for epidemiological surveillance and investigation of particular infections, a number of typing methods for C. jejuni have been developed. Recent studies indicate that molecular methods can offer greater potential for C. jejuni strain differentiation than do phenotypic techniques such as serotyping with heat-labile antigens (13), O serotyping based on lipopolysaccharide antigens (18), biotyping (3), and phage typing (6). Genotyping based on molecular methods can evaluate the phylogenetic, as well as epidemiological, relationships among strains that share surface markers, such as those detected by serotype or phage type determinants (5, 10, 14-16).

Detection of restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) with either rRNA or specific DNA probes is a relatively simple and reproducible molecular technique and has been useful in the epidemiological characterization of other pathogenic microorganisms (6, 15). Jackson et al., using a C. jejuni cosmid clone as a probe, showed greater discrimination with RFLP than with conventional ribotyping using a 16S rRNA gene probe (11, 12), suggesting the utility of such analyses in Campylobacter epidemiological studies.

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the usefulness of methods based on RFLPs using random chromosomal DNA probes in Southern hybridizations for epidemiological analysis of C. jejuni infection. We analyzed RFLP of C. jejuni DNA after digestion with each of three restriction enzymes (HaeIII, HhaI, and HpaII) in Southern blots, using each of two unrelated cosmid clones containing 30- to 40-kb C. jejuni chromosomal DNA fragments. Examining isolates obtained from patients with sporadic infections and from a defined C. jejuni outbreak showed that we could easily distinguish unrelated and related strains.

Southern hybridization. Purified chromosomal DNAs from these bacteria were prepared by the method of Pitcher et al. (19) with minor modifications, as previously reported (7). The DNAs were digested overnight with each restriction enzyme and were electrophoresed in 0.8% agarose gels with 0.5× TBE (90 mM Tris-borate, 2 mM EDTA) running buffer. After electrophoresis, DNA fragments were transferred to a nylon membrane (Biodyne B; Pall Ultrafine Corp., East Hills, N.Y.) as described previously (9). Membranes then were air dried and the DNA was fixed by baking for 2 h at 80°C. Cosmid clones containing C. jejuni DNA inserts of 30 to 40 kb were used as probes. They were obtained from a genomic library constructed from Sau3AI-digested C. jejuni OH4384 (an isolate from a patient with Guillain-Barré syndrome [2]) chromosomal fragments cloned into the cosmid vector SuperCOS (Stratagene Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Extraction of purified cosmid DNA was accomplished using the alkaline sodium dodecyl sulfate lysis method (20). The probe (100 ng) and lambda (30 ng) control DNA were labeled with 32P as described previously (22). Membranes were hybridized with the probes for 18 h at 65°C. After washing, the signal was detected by exposure to X-ray film.

Pattern interpretation. Band matching and estimation of restriction fragment sizes were carried out with the Gel-Pro Analyzer software (Media Cybernetics, Silver Spring, Md.) with HindIII-digested lambda DNA as a control. The designations shown in Table 1 (such as 15H2) represent the probe number (P14 or P15), the restriction enzyme used (A, HaeIII; H, HhaI; P, HpaII), and the RFLP pattern number, respectively. For example, 15H2 indicates RFLP pattern 2 in HhaI-digested samples hybridized with probe A15. The specific patterns used in this study are available from the corresponding author by e-mail.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1.   Characteristic of C. jejuni strains examined in this study

Selection of restriction enzymes suitable for RFLP analyses and probes. As a first step, we searched for restriction enzymes for optimal analysis using three C. jejuni cosmid clones as DNA probes. The enzymes tested that recognize a five- or six-base sequence were not suitable for analysis, and of those that recognize a four-base sequence, HhaI, HaeIII, and HpaII gave the best discrimination (Fig. 1). A greater number of distinct RFLPs were identified when cosmid clone P14 (30 kb) or P15 (35 kb) was used as the probes than when P2 was used (Fig. 1); therefore, P14 and P15 were chosen for subsequent studies. P14 and P15 did not cross-hybridize, and flaA and 16S ribosomal DNA probes PCR amplified using the primers previously reported (4, 7) did not hybridize to P14 and P15 (data not shown). Partial DNA sequence analysis of these probes and a BLAST search of the Campylobacter database of the Sanger Centre (http://www.medmicro.mds.qmw.ac.uk/campylobacter/) were performed. The sequences of the cosmids were nearly identical to those of clones camp65g8.plc, camp104a12.plt, and camp162g3.qlc for P14 and those of camp5a1.qlt and camp29e2.plc for P15 (data not shown).


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.   Southern hybridization of HaeIII (lanes 1 to 4)-, HhaI (lanes 5 to 8)-, or HpaII (lanes 9 to 12)-digested C. jejuni DNA using probes P2 (A), P14 (B), and P15 (C). Molecular size markers are HindIII-digested lambda  fragments. Lanes: 1, 5, and 9, strain FSH1; 2, 6, and 10, strain FSH2; 3, 7, and 11, strain FSH3; 4, 8, and 12, strain FSH4.

Stability of RFLPs. In epidemiological analysis, the stability and reproducibility of strain identification systems are critical. To test these, we examined strains that were serially passaged in vitro or passaged in vivo. Strain OH4384 was subcultured serially 12 times on brucella agar plates, and then 10 single colonies were picked and RFLPs were investigated. All of these substrains had identical RFLP profiles. Similarly, strain OH4384 was orally inoculated into a suckling mouse and reisolated from the liver 3 days later. This animal-passaged strain was shown to have the same RFLP patterns as the parental strain (data not shown). These results provide confidence that the genomic regions investigated do not mutate easily and that, although the method proposed cannot detect base substitution mutations except at the recognition sites, the RFLP patterns of C. jejuni strains are sufficiently stable for epidemiological analyses. The stability of RFLP patterns is supported by analyses of isolates from a patient with long-term infection and of strains from patients within a family cluster of infection described below. Therefore, we concluded that RFLP analyses using P14 and P15 as probes and digestion of chromosomal DNA with HaeIII, HhaI, or HpaII are suitable for genotyping of C. jejuni strains.

Application to sporadic and outbreak cases. An outbreak investigation is often used to assess the discriminatory power of a new typing method. In this case, strains from a 1996 school outbreak due to a contaminated lunch were investigated. Ten strains from outbreak-associated patients supplied by the Fukuoka Institute of Health and Environmental Sciences (HKC series; Table 1), belonged to one of three different O serotypes, O12 (one strain), O21 (four strains), or the O4,13,16,43,50 complex (five strains). The O serotypes of the strains were determined using the Campylobacter typing kit (Denkaseiken, Tokyo, Japan), following the manufacturer's instructions. SmaI-digested pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) analysis, performed as previously described (8), showed that strains with the same O serotype had identical patterns (Table 1). RFLPs of these strains were analyzed after DNA digestion with HaeIII, HhaI, or HpaII and using P14 or P15 as a probe (Table 1). All five O4,13,16,43,50 complex strains had identical genotypes for P14 (designated 14A1-14H1-14P1) and for P15 (15A1-15H1-15P1). Similarly, the four serogroup O21 strains had identical genotypes (14A2-14H2-14P2 and 15A2-15H2-15P2). The remaining strain (serotype O12) had a different genotype (14A3-14H2-14P2 and 15A3-15H3-15P3). These results indicate that this genotyping technique is feasible for epidemiological analysis of Campylobacter outbreaks.

Next, we investigated 18 clinical isolates from 16 patients with diarrhea who visited the Department of Pediatrics, Saiseikai Fukuoka Hospital, in Fukuoka City in 1996 and 1997 (FSH series 1 to 16 in Table 1). None of these patients were known to be related to the school outbreak. Thirteen strains were from cases that appeared to be sporadic (FSH1 to FSH12 and FSH14), two were from patients within a family (FSH15 and FSH16), and the remaining three were from one patient who had a persistent infection (FSH13-1, -2, and -3) (Table 1). The RFLP method clearly distinguished related and unrelated strains. Each of the 13 strains from cases 1 to 13 had a unique PFGE pattern. There were 12 different HaeIII, 12 different HhaI, and 8 different HpaII patterns using probe P15 (Table 1). This tendency was similar for probe P14; HaeIII and HhaI were the most discriminative (12 patterns by HaeIII, 11 by HhaI, and 7 by HpaII). Most of the sporadic strains examined were distinguished by the profile produced by either of these two digestions and a single probe (11 or 12 of 16 strains by HaeIII or HhaI for probe P15 and 11 or 14 for P14), but some strains required a second enzyme for complete discrimination (FSH1 and FSH10 discriminated by HaeIII, FSH11 and FSH12 discriminated by HhaI for P15 and for P14). Occasionally, for particular strains (i.e., FSH10 and FSH11), a second probe was required for discrimination. These results indicate that although the use of a single probe often yields sufficient discrimination, inclusion of a second, unrelated probe may be advantageous. For the combination of the three enzymes and two probes, each of these 13 strains had a different profile.

Three isolates from case 13 (FSH13-1, -2, and -3) were obtained from stool cultures on days 8, 15, and 25 after the onset of intestinal symptoms. During this period, the patient's strain had become resistant to norfloxacin and clarithromycin. The genotypes of the three isolates were the same as those shown by analyses using both probes with each enzyme and by independent PFGE (Table 1).

Isolates from patients FSH14, FSH15, and FSH16 had RFLP patterns (14A1-14H1-14P1 and 15A1-15H1-15P1) identical to those of one of the outbreak strains. PFGE analysis of these strains after SmaI digestion showed that the three isolates had the same RFLP pattern as the outbreak strains (Table 1 and Fig. 2). Sporadic cases 15 and 16 involved 6- and 1-year-old brothers living together. Their illness onsets were 5 days apart, suggesting that case 15 represented a secondary infection. Case 14 was not directly related to either case 15 or 16. None of these three children attended the affected school but became ill at about the same time as the outbreak cases. That the O serotypes of these strains also are identical to that of one of the outbreak strains (the O4,13,16,43,50 complex) suggests that these strains all were closely related and that the school outbreak was part of a larger outbreak in the city.


View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2.   PFGE of SmaI-digested C. jejuni chromosomal DNA. The molecular size marker is the lambda  ladder. Lanes: 1 to 3, outbreak strains HKC10, HKC16, and HKC37; 4 to 6, sporadic strains FSH14, FSH15, and FSH16.

The RFLP analysis described here used two cosmid clones containing a total of 65 kb of genomic DNA (approximately 5% of the C. jejuni chromosome) (21) as probes and digestion of target DNA with three restriction endonucleases. Use of multiple restriction enzymes in combination with multiple probes should provide excellent discriminatory power. That we were able to clearly identify related and unrelated clinical isolates by using three enzymes and two probes supports that hypothesis. In epidemiological analysis of Campylobacter infections, PFGE, random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis (7), and flagellin gene typing (RFLP analysis of PCR-amplified flagellin genes) (14) have been the most discriminative methods (17). In this study, we compared the results obtained by our random clone methods with data from PFGE analysis. PFGE analyzes bacterial genomes based on RFLP, using infrequent cutting sites scattered throughout the entire genome. The method introduced here analyzes smaller parts of the genome in greater detail. Since, for both the outbreak and sporadic strains, the data produced by the two methods are entirely consistent, we believe that use of the random chromosomal DNA probes has discriminatory power comparable to that of PFGE analysis.

In conclusion, the method described here provides a stable and discriminative tool for differentiating among C. jejuni strains that might be useful in future epidemiological analyses of this infection, together with other molecular subtyping techniques. To facilitate this, clones P14 and P15 will be made available to other investigators by the corresponding author (e-mail: fujimoto{at}shs.kyushu-u.ac.jp).


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported in part by grant A09770185 from the Ministry of Education and Science of Japan, by a grant from the Kaibara Science Foundation, and by the Medical Research Service of the Department of Veterans Affairs.

We thank Michiko Kurokawa for the clinical C. jejuni strains and Sin-ichi Yoshida for his support.


    FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Infectious Diseases Laboratory, School of Health Science, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan. Phone: 81-92-642-6732. Fax: 81-92-642-6674. E-mail: fujimoto{at}shs.kyushu-u.ac.jp.


    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Text
References

1. Allos, B. M., and M. J. Blaser. 1995. Campylobacter jejuni and the expanding spectrum of related infections. Clin. Infect. Dis. 20:1092-1099[Medline].
2. Aspinall, G. O., S. Fujimoto, A. G. McDonald, H. Pang, L. A. Kurjanczyk, and J. L. Penner. 1994. Lipopolysaccharides from Campylobacter jejuni associated with Guillain-Barré syndrome patients mimic human gangliosides in structure. Infect. Immun. 62:2122-2125[Abstract/Free Full Text].
3. Bolton, F. J., H. C. Dawkins, and D. N. Hutchinson. 1985. Biotypes and serotypes of thermophilic campylobacters isolated from cattle, sheep and pig offal and other red meats. J. Hyg. 95:1-6.
4. Edwards, U., T. Rogall, H. Blocker, M. Emde, and E. C. Bottger. 1989. Isolation and direct complete nucleotide determination of entire genes. Characterization of a gene coding for 16S ribosomal RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 17:7843-7853[Abstract/Free Full Text].
5. Fayos, A., R. J. Owen, J. Hernandez, C. Jones, and A. Lastovica. 1993. Molecular subtyping by genome and plasmid analysis of Campylobacter jejuni serogroups O1 and O2 (Penner) from sporadic and outbreak cases of human diarrhoea. Epidemiol. Infect. 111:415-427[Medline].
6. Frost, E. H., S. Deslandes, S. Veilleux, and D. Bourgaux-Ramoisy. 1991. Typing Chlamydia trachomatis by detection of restriction fragment length polymorphism in the gene encoding the major outer membrane protein. J. Infect. Dis. 163:1103-1107[Medline].
7. Fujimoto, S., B. M. Allos, N. Misawa, C. M. Patton, and M. J. Blaser. 1997. Restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis and random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis of Campylobacter jejuni strains isolated from patients with Guillain-Barre syndrome. J. Infect. Dis. 176:1105-1108[Medline].
8. Fujita, M., S. Fujimoto, T. Morooka, and K. Amako. 1995. Analysis of strains of Campylobacter fetus by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:1676-1678[Abstract].
9. Fujita, M., T. Morooka, S. Fujimoto, T. Moriya, and K. Amako. 1995. Southern blotting analyses of strains of Campylobacter fetus using the conserved region of sapA. Arch. Microbiol. 164:444-447[CrossRef][Medline].
10. Gibson, J. R., C. Fitzgerald, and R. J. Owen. 1995. Comparison of PFGE, ribotyping and phage-typing in the epidemiological analysis of Campylobacter jejuni serotype HS2 infections. Epidemiol. Infect. 115:215-225[Medline].
11. Jackson, C. J., A. J. Fox, D. R. Wareing, D. N. Hutchinson, and D. M. Jones. 1996. The application of genotyping techniques to the epidemiological analysis of Campylobacter jejuni. Epidemiol. Infect. 117:233-244[Medline].
12. Jackson, C. J., A. J. Fox, D. R. Wareing, E. M. Sutcliffe, and D. M. Jones. 1997. Genotype analysis of human blood isolates of Campylobacter jejuni in England and Wales. Epidemiol. Infect. 118:81-89[CrossRef][Medline].
13. Lior, H., D. L. Woodward, J. A. Edgar, L. J. Laroche, and P. Gill. 1982. Serotyping of Campylobacter jejuni by slide agglutination based on heat-labile antigenic factors. J. Clin. Microbiol. 15:761-768[Abstract/Free Full Text].
14. Nachamkin, I., K. Bohachick, and C. M. Patton. 1993. Flagellin gene typing of Campylobacter jejuni by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 31:1531-1536[Abstract/Free Full Text].
15. Ni, H., A. I. Knight, K. A. Cartwright, and J. J. McFadden. 1992. Phylogenetic and epidemiological analysis of Neisseria meningitidis using DNA probes. Epidemiol. Infect. 109:227-239[Medline].
16. Owen, R. J., K. Sutherland, C. Fitzgerald, J. Gibson, P. Borman, and J. Stanley. 1995. Molecular subtyping scheme for serotypes HS1 and HS4 of Campylobacter jejuni. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:872-877[Abstract].
17. Patton, C. M., I. K. Wachsmuth, G. M. Evins, J. A. Kiehlbauch, B. D. Plikaytis, N. Troup, L. Tompkins, and H. Lior. 1991. Evaluation of 10 methods to distinguish epidemic-associated Campylobacter strains. J. Clin. Microbiol. 29:680-688[Abstract/Free Full Text].
18. Penner, J. L., J. N. Hennessy, and R. V. Congi. 1983. Serotyping of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli on the basis of thermostable antigens. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2:378-383[CrossRef][Medline].
19. Pitcher, D. G., N. A. Saunders, and R. J. Owen. 1989. Rapid extraction of bacterial genomic DNA with guanidium thiocyanate. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 8:151-156.
20. Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed., p. 25-28. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
21. Taylor, D. E. 1992. Genetic analysis of Campylobacter spp., p. 241-254. In I. Nachamkin, M. J. Blaser, and L. S. Tompkins (ed.), Campylobacter jejuni: current status and future trends. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
22. Umene, K. 1985. Variability of the region of the herpes simplex virus type 1 genome yielding DNA: SmaI fragment polymorphism. Intervirology 23:131-139[Medline].


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2000, p. 1664-1667, Vol. 38, No. 4
0095-1137/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fujimoto, S.
Right arrow Articles by Blaser, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fujimoto, S.
Right arrow Articles by Blaser, M. J.