Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2000, p. 1664-1667, Vol. 38, No. 4
0095-1137/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis Using Random
Chromosomal Gene Probes for Epidemiological Analysis of
Campylobacter jejuni Infections
Shuji
Fujimoto,1,*
Kenichi
Umene,2
Mitsumasa
Saito,3
Kazumi
Horikawa,4 and
Martin
J.
Blaser5
Infectious Diseases Laboratory, School of Health
Science,1 and Department of
Virology2 and Department of
Bacteriology,3 Faculty of Medicine, Kyushu
University, and Fukuoka Institute of Health and Environmental
Sciences,4 Fukuoka, Japan, and
Division of Infectious Diseases, Vanderbilt University School
of Medicine, and Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Nashville,
Tennessee5
Received 23 September 1999/Returned for modification 22 November
1999/Accepted 8 January 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
We have evaluated the ability of a new genotyping method for
Campylobacter jejuni based on restriction fragment length
polymorphisms using random chromosomal gene probes. DNAs from C. jejuni strains digested with each of three restriction enzymes,
HhaI, HaeIII, and HpaII, were
analyzed by Southern hybridization using each of two unrelated cosmid
clones, P14 and P15 (respectively containing 30- and 35-kb genomic DNA
fragments of C. jejuni strain OH4384). The method reported
provides a stable and discriminating means for identifying C. jejuni strains and should be useful for epidemiological analyses.
 |
TEXT |
Campylobacter jejuni is
one of the most common causes of human bacterial gastroenteritis in the
world. Since most C. jejuni infections are sporadic
(1), their epidemiology must be clarified in order to design
and implement effective intervention strategies. Since methods for
high-resolution identification of strains are necessary for
epidemiological surveillance and investigation of particular
infections, a number of typing methods for C. jejuni have
been developed. Recent studies indicate that molecular methods can
offer greater potential for C. jejuni strain differentiation than do phenotypic techniques such as serotyping with heat-labile antigens (13), O serotyping based on
lipopolysaccharide antigens (18), biotyping (3),
and phage typing (6). Genotyping based on molecular
methods can evaluate the phylogenetic, as well as epidemiological,
relationships among strains that share surface markers, such as those
detected by serotype or phage type determinants (5, 10,
14-16).
Detection of restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) with
either rRNA or specific DNA probes is a relatively simple and
reproducible molecular technique and has been useful in the epidemiological characterization of other pathogenic microorganisms (6, 15). Jackson et al., using a C. jejuni cosmid clone as a probe, showed greater discrimination with
RFLP than with conventional ribotyping using a 16S rRNA gene probe
(11, 12), suggesting the utility of such analyses in
Campylobacter epidemiological studies.
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the usefulness of methods
based on RFLPs using random chromosomal DNA probes in Southern
hybridizations for epidemiological analysis of C. jejuni
infection. We analyzed RFLP of C. jejuni DNA after digestion with each of three restriction enzymes (HaeIII,
HhaI, and HpaII) in Southern blots, using each of
two unrelated cosmid clones containing 30- to 40-kb C. jejuni chromosomal DNA fragments. Examining isolates obtained from
patients with sporadic infections and from a defined C. jejuni outbreak showed that we could easily distinguish unrelated and related strains.
Southern hybridization.
Purified chromosomal DNAs from these
bacteria were prepared by the method of Pitcher et al. (19)
with minor modifications, as previously reported (7). The
DNAs were digested overnight with each restriction enzyme and were
electrophoresed in 0.8% agarose gels with 0.5× TBE (90 mM
Tris-borate, 2 mM EDTA) running buffer. After electrophoresis, DNA
fragments were transferred to a nylon membrane (Biodyne B; Pall
Ultrafine Corp., East Hills, N.Y.) as described previously
(9). Membranes then were air dried and the DNA was fixed by
baking for 2 h at 80°C. Cosmid clones containing C. jejuni DNA inserts of 30 to 40 kb were used as probes. They were
obtained from a genomic library constructed from
Sau3AI-digested C. jejuni OH4384 (an isolate from
a patient with Guillain-Barré syndrome [2])
chromosomal fragments cloned into the cosmid vector SuperCOS
(Stratagene Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Extraction of purified cosmid DNA was
accomplished using the alkaline sodium dodecyl sulfate lysis method
(20). The probe (100 ng) and lambda (30 ng) control DNA were
labeled with 32P as described previously
(22). Membranes were hybridized with the probes for
18 h at 65°C. After washing, the signal was detected by exposure
to X-ray film.
Pattern interpretation.
Band matching and estimation of
restriction fragment sizes were carried out with the Gel-Pro Analyzer
software (Media Cybernetics, Silver Spring, Md.) with
HindIII-digested lambda DNA as a control. The
designations shown in Table 1 (such as
15H2) represent the probe number (P14 or P15), the
restriction enzyme used (A, HaeIII; H, HhaI; P,
HpaII), and the RFLP pattern number, respectively. For
example, 15H2 indicates RFLP pattern 2 in
HhaI-digested samples hybridized with probe A15. The
specific patterns used in this study are available from the
corresponding author by e-mail.
Selection of restriction enzymes suitable for RFLP analyses and
probes.
As a first step, we searched for restriction enzymes for
optimal analysis using three C. jejuni cosmid clones as DNA
probes. The enzymes tested that recognize a five- or six-base sequence were not suitable for analysis, and of those that recognize a four-base
sequence, HhaI, HaeIII, and HpaII gave
the best discrimination (Fig.
1). A greater number of
distinct RFLPs were identified when cosmid clone P14 (30 kb) or P15 (35 kb) was used as the probes than when P2 was used (Fig. 1); therefore,
P14 and P15 were chosen for subsequent studies. P14 and P15 did not
cross-hybridize, and flaA and 16S ribosomal DNA probes PCR
amplified using the primers previously reported (4, 7) did
not hybridize to P14 and P15 (data not shown). Partial DNA sequence
analysis of these probes and a BLAST search of the
Campylobacter database of the Sanger Centre
(http://www.medmicro.mds.qmw.ac.uk/campylobacter/) were performed. The
sequences of the cosmids were nearly identical to those of clones
camp65g8.plc, camp104a12.plt, and camp162g3.qlc for P14 and those of
camp5a1.qlt and camp29e2.plc for P15 (data not shown).

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Southern hybridization of HaeIII (lanes 1 to
4)-, HhaI (lanes 5 to 8)-, or HpaII (lanes 9 to
12)-digested C. jejuni DNA using probes P2 (A), P14 (B), and
P15 (C). Molecular size markers are HindIII-digested fragments. Lanes: 1, 5, and 9, strain FSH1; 2, 6, and 10, strain FSH2;
3, 7, and 11, strain FSH3; 4, 8, and 12, strain FSH4.
|
|
Stability of RFLPs.
In epidemiological analysis, the stability
and reproducibility of strain identification systems are critical. To
test these, we examined strains that were serially passaged in
vitro or passaged in vivo. Strain OH4384 was subcultured serially 12 times on brucella agar plates, and then 10 single colonies
were picked and RFLPs were investigated. All of these substrains had
identical RFLP profiles. Similarly, strain OH4384 was orally inoculated
into a suckling mouse and reisolated from the liver 3 days later. This animal-passaged strain was shown to have the same RFLP patterns as the
parental strain (data not shown). These results provide confidence that
the genomic regions investigated do not mutate easily and that,
although the method proposed cannot detect base substitution mutations
except at the recognition sites, the RFLP patterns of C. jejuni strains are sufficiently stable for epidemiological analyses. The stability of RFLP patterns is supported by analyses of
isolates from a patient with long-term infection and of strains from
patients within a family cluster of infection described below. Therefore, we concluded that RFLP analyses using P14 and P15 as probes
and digestion of chromosomal DNA with HaeIII,
HhaI, or HpaII are suitable for genotyping of
C. jejuni strains.
Application to sporadic and outbreak cases.
An outbreak
investigation is often used to assess the discriminatory power of a new
typing method. In this case, strains from a 1996 school outbreak due to
a contaminated lunch were investigated. Ten strains from
outbreak-associated patients supplied by the Fukuoka Institute
of Health and Environmental Sciences (HKC series; Table 1), belonged to
one of three different O serotypes, O12 (one strain), O21 (four
strains), or the O4,13,16,43,50 complex (five strains).
The O serotypes of the strains were determined using the Campylobacter
typing kit (Denkaseiken, Tokyo, Japan), following the manufacturer's
instructions. SmaI-digested pulsed-field gel
electrophoresis (PFGE) analysis, performed as
previously described (8), showed that strains with the same
O serotype had identical patterns (Table 1). RFLPs of these strains
were analyzed after DNA digestion with HaeIII,
HhaI, or HpaII and using P14 or P15 as a probe
(Table 1). All five O4,13,16,43,50 complex strains had identical
genotypes for P14 (designated
14A1-14H1-14P1) and for P15
(15A1-15H1-15P1). Similarly, the
four serogroup O21 strains had identical genotypes
(14A2-14H2-14P2 and
15A2-15H2-15P2). The remaining
strain (serotype O12) had a different genotype
(14A3-14H2-14P2 and
15A3-15H3-15P3). These results
indicate that this genotyping technique is feasible for epidemiological
analysis of Campylobacter outbreaks.
Next, we investigated 18 clinical isolates from 16 patients with
diarrhea who visited the Department of Pediatrics, Saiseikai
Fukuoka
Hospital, in Fukuoka City in 1996 and 1997 (FSH series
1 to 16 in Table
1). None of these patients were known to be
related to the school
outbreak. Thirteen strains were from cases
that appeared to be sporadic
(FSH1 to FSH12 and FSH14), two were
from patients within a family
(FSH15 and FSH16), and the remaining
three were from one patient who
had a persistent infection (FSH13-1,
-2, and -3) (Table
1). The RFLP
method clearly distinguished
related and unrelated strains. Each of the
13 strains from cases
1 to 13 had a unique PFGE pattern. There were 12 different
HaeIII,
12 different
HhaI, and 8 different
HpaII patterns using probe
P15 (Table
1). This
tendency was similar for probe P14;
HaeIII
and
HhaI were the most discriminative (12 patterns by
HaeIII,
11 by
HhaI, and 7 by
HpaII). Most of the sporadic strains examined
were
distinguished by the profile produced by either of these
two digestions
and a single probe (11 or 12 of 16 strains by
HaeIII
or
HhaI for probe P15 and 11 or 14 for P14), but some strains
required a second enzyme for complete discrimination (FSH1 and
FSH10
discriminated by
HaeIII, FSH11 and FSH12 discriminated by
HhaI for P15 and for P14). Occasionally, for particular
strains
(i.e., FSH10 and FSH11), a second probe was required for
discrimination.
These results indicate that although the use of a
single probe
often yields sufficient discrimination, inclusion of a
second,
unrelated probe may be advantageous. For the combination of the
three enzymes and two probes, each of these 13 strains had a different
profile.
Three isolates from case 13 (FSH13-1, -2, and -3) were obtained from
stool cultures on days 8, 15, and 25 after the onset
of intestinal
symptoms. During this period, the patient's strain
had become
resistant to norfloxacin and clarithromycin. The genotypes
of the three
isolates were the same as those shown by analyses
using both probes
with each enzyme and by independent PFGE (Table
1).
Isolates from patients FSH14, FSH15, and FSH16 had RFLP
patterns (
14A1-
14H1-
14P1 and
15A1-
15H1-
15P1) identical to those
of
one of the outbreak strains. PFGE analysis of these strains after
SmaI digestion showed that the three isolates had the same
RFLP
pattern as the outbreak strains (Table
1 and Fig.
2). Sporadic
cases 15 and 16 involved 6- and 1-year-old brothers living together.
Their illness onsets were 5 days apart, suggesting that case 15
represented a secondary infection.
Case 14 was not directly related
to either case 15 or 16. None of these
three children attended
the affected school but became ill at about the
same time as the
outbreak cases. That the O serotypes of these strains
also are
identical to that of one of the outbreak strains (the
O4,13,16,43,50
complex) suggests that these strains all were closely
related
and that the school outbreak was part of a larger outbreak in
the city.

View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
PFGE of SmaI-digested C. jejuni
chromosomal DNA. The molecular size marker is the ladder. Lanes: 1 to 3, outbreak strains HKC10, HKC16, and HKC37; 4 to 6, sporadic
strains FSH14, FSH15, and FSH16.
|
|
The RFLP analysis described here used two cosmid clones containing a
total of 65 kb of genomic DNA (approximately 5% of the
C. jejuni chromosome) (
21) as probes and
digestion of target
DNA with three restriction endonucleases. Use
of multiple restriction
enzymes in combination with multiple
probes should provide excellent
discriminatory power. That we were able
to clearly identify related
and unrelated clinical isolates by using
three enzymes and two
probes supports that hypothesis. In
epidemiological analysis of
Campylobacter infections, PFGE,
random amplified polymorphic DNA
analysis (
7), and flagellin
gene typing (RFLP analysis of PCR-amplified
flagellin genes)
(
14) have been the most discriminative methods
(
17). In this study, we compared the results obtained by our
random clone methods with data from PFGE analysis. PFGE analyzes
bacterial genomes based on RFLP, using infrequent cutting sites
scattered throughout the entire genome. The method introduced
here analyzes smaller parts of the genome in greater detail. Since,
for both the outbreak and sporadic strains, the data produced
by the
two methods are entirely consistent, we believe that use
of the random
chromosomal DNA probes has discriminatory power
comparable to
that of PFGE
analysis.
In conclusion, the method described here provides a stable and
discriminative tool for differentiating among
C. jejuni strains
that might be useful in future
epidemiological analyses of this
infection, together with other
molecular subtyping techniques.
To facilitate this, clones P14 and P15
will be made available
to other investigators by the corresponding
author (e-mail:
fujimoto{at}shs.kyushu-u.ac.jp).
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This study was supported in part by grant A09770185 from the
Ministry of Education and Science of Japan, by a grant from the Kaibara
Science Foundation, and by the Medical Research Service of the
Department of Veterans Affairs.
We thank Michiko Kurokawa for the clinical C. jejuni strains
and Sin-ichi Yoshida for his support.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Infectious
Diseases Laboratory, School of Health Science, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan. Phone: 81-92-642-6732. Fax: 81-92-642-6674. E-mail:
fujimoto{at}shs.kyushu-u.ac.jp.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Allos, B. M., and M. J. Blaser.
1995.
Campylobacter jejuni and the expanding spectrum of related infections.
Clin. Infect. Dis.
20:1092-1099[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Aspinall, G. O.,
S. Fujimoto,
A. G. McDonald,
H. Pang,
L. A. Kurjanczyk, and J. L. Penner.
1994.
Lipopolysaccharides from Campylobacter jejuni associated with Guillain-Barré syndrome patients mimic human gangliosides in structure.
Infect. Immun.
62:2122-2125[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Bolton, F. J.,
H. C. Dawkins, and D. N. Hutchinson.
1985.
Biotypes and serotypes of thermophilic campylobacters isolated from cattle, sheep and pig offal and other red meats.
J. Hyg.
95:1-6.
|
| 4.
|
Edwards, U.,
T. Rogall,
H. Blocker,
M. Emde, and E. C. Bottger.
1989.
Isolation and direct complete nucleotide determination of entire genes. Characterization of a gene coding for 16S ribosomal RNA.
Nucleic Acids Res.
17:7843-7853[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Fayos, A.,
R. J. Owen,
J. Hernandez,
C. Jones, and A. Lastovica.
1993.
Molecular subtyping by genome and plasmid analysis of Campylobacter jejuni serogroups O1 and O2 (Penner) from sporadic and outbreak cases of human diarrhoea.
Epidemiol. Infect.
111:415-427[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Frost, E. H.,
S. Deslandes,
S. Veilleux, and D. Bourgaux-Ramoisy.
1991.
Typing Chlamydia trachomatis by detection of restriction fragment length polymorphism in the gene encoding the major outer membrane protein.
J. Infect. Dis.
163:1103-1107[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Fujimoto, S.,
B. M. Allos,
N. Misawa,
C. M. Patton, and M. J. Blaser.
1997.
Restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis and random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis of Campylobacter jejuni strains isolated from patients with Guillain-Barre syndrome.
J. Infect. Dis.
176:1105-1108[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Fujita, M.,
S. Fujimoto,
T. Morooka, and K. Amako.
1995.
Analysis of strains of Campylobacter fetus by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
33:1676-1678[Abstract].
|
| 9.
|
Fujita, M.,
T. Morooka,
S. Fujimoto,
T. Moriya, and K. Amako.
1995.
Southern blotting analyses of strains of Campylobacter fetus using the conserved region of sapA.
Arch. Microbiol.
164:444-447[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Gibson, J. R.,
C. Fitzgerald, and R. J. Owen.
1995.
Comparison of PFGE, ribotyping and phage-typing in the epidemiological analysis of Campylobacter jejuni serotype HS2 infections.
Epidemiol. Infect.
115:215-225[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Jackson, C. J.,
A. J. Fox,
D. R. Wareing,
D. N. Hutchinson, and D. M. Jones.
1996.
The application of genotyping techniques to the epidemiological analysis of Campylobacter jejuni.
Epidemiol. Infect.
117:233-244[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Jackson, C. J.,
A. J. Fox,
D. R. Wareing,
E. M. Sutcliffe, and D. M. Jones.
1997.
Genotype analysis of human blood isolates of Campylobacter jejuni in England and Wales.
Epidemiol. Infect.
118:81-89[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Lior, H.,
D. L. Woodward,
J. A. Edgar,
L. J. Laroche, and P. Gill.
1982.
Serotyping of Campylobacter jejuni by slide agglutination based on heat-labile antigenic factors.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
15:761-768[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Nachamkin, I.,
K. Bohachick, and C. M. Patton.
1993.
Flagellin gene typing of Campylobacter jejuni by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
31:1531-1536[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Ni, H.,
A. I. Knight,
K. A. Cartwright, and J. J. McFadden.
1992.
Phylogenetic and epidemiological analysis of Neisseria meningitidis using DNA probes.
Epidemiol. Infect.
109:227-239[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Owen, R. J.,
K. Sutherland,
C. Fitzgerald,
J. Gibson,
P. Borman, and J. Stanley.
1995.
Molecular subtyping scheme for serotypes HS1 and HS4 of Campylobacter jejuni.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
33:872-877[Abstract].
|
| 17.
|
Patton, C. M.,
I. K. Wachsmuth,
G. M. Evins,
J. A. Kiehlbauch,
B. D. Plikaytis,
N. Troup,
L. Tompkins, and H. Lior.
1991.
Evaluation of 10 methods to distinguish epidemic-associated Campylobacter strains.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
29:680-688[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Penner, J. L.,
J. N. Hennessy, and R. V. Congi.
1983.
Serotyping of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli on the basis of thermostable antigens.
Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol.
2:378-383[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Pitcher, D. G.,
N. A. Saunders, and R. J. Owen.
1989.
Rapid extraction of bacterial genomic DNA with guanidium thiocyanate.
Lett. Appl. Microbiol.
8:151-156.
|
| 20.
|
Sambrook, J.,
E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis.
1989.
Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed., p. 25-28.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 21.
|
Taylor, D. E.
1992.
Genetic analysis of Campylobacter spp., p. 241-254.
In
I. Nachamkin, M. J. Blaser, and L. S. Tompkins (ed.), Campylobacter jejuni: current status and future trends. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
|
| 22.
|
Umene, K.
1985.
Variability of the region of the herpes simplex virus type 1 genome yielding DNA: SmaI fragment polymorphism.
Intervirology
23:131-139[Medline].
|
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2000, p. 1664-1667, Vol. 38, No. 4
0095-1137/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.