Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2000, p. 1688-1693, Vol. 38, No. 4
0095-1137/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Evaluation of the Sirscan Automated Zone Reader
in a Clinical Microbiology Laboratory
Antone A.
Medeiros* and
Joyce
Crellin
Brown University, Lifespan Academic Medical
Center, The Miriam Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island 02906
Received 22 June 1999/Returned for modification 21 August
1999/Accepted 25 January 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
We compared readings of Kirby-Bauer plates by the Sirscan, an
automated image analyzer that measures zone diameters, to those of
experienced clinical microbiologists measuring zones with a hand-held
caliper interfaced to a computer and with a ruler. To read plates of
Escherichia coli, Morganella morganii, and
Pseudomonas aeruginosa containing 12 antibiotic disks the
Sirscan took 11 s; technologists took 28 s by caliper and
39 s by ruler. Reading times of four different technologists
ranged from 22 to 44 s with the caliper and 10 to 12 s with
Sirscan. Upon repeated testing zone size variation rarely exceeded 3 mm
by caliper and 1 mm by Sirscan. Over a 4-month period, 368 clinical
isolates were tested prospectively by both methods in the Clinical
Microbiology Laboratory of the Miriam Hospital. There was good
correlation of zone sizes for most antibiotics, but Sirscan zone
diameter measurements tended to be 3 to 5 mm larger than caliper
readings for ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin, aztreonam, erythromycin,
clindamycin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Very major errors
(resistant by caliper and susceptible by Sirscan) occurred with 10 of
3,770 readings (0.3%), mainly where breakpoint criteria lacked an
intermediate zone. They occurred in testing staphylococci with
amoxicillin-clavulanate (5 of 127 isolates, 3.9%), pseudomonas with
piperacillin (1 of 28, 3.6%), coagulase-negative staphylococci
with oxacillin (2 of 74, 2.7%), gram-negative bacilli with cefuroxime
(1 of 209, 0.5%), and mixed species with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (1 of 366, 0.3%). The Sirscan zone reader facilitates accurate, fully quantitative susceptibility testing in clinical
microbiology laboratories.
 |
TEXT |
Early detection of emerging
resistance mechanisms requires quantitative susceptibility
testing, either zone diameter measurements or full panel MICs, as
recommended by the ASM Task Force on Antibiotic Resistance
(2). However, most commonly used automated methods provide
only breakpoint values of antibiotic susceptibility. Single disk
diffusion provides more endpoint values, about 35, than most full-panel
dilution methods, about 12, but measuring zone sizes is tedious,
time-consuming, and fraught with transcription errors. An automated
method of measuring zone sizes would obviate these limitations.
In our clinical microbiology laboratory, we evaluated the Sirscan (i2a,
Montpelier, France), an automated image analyzer that measures zone
diameters and provides a user-programmed expert system that screens the
results of each isolate. The program also extrapolates zone sizes to
MICs and reports both.
Susceptibility tests.
Testing was performed by the Kirby-Bauer
single disk diffusion method according to National Committee on
Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) guidelines (4), using
150-mm round plates of Mueller-Hinton agar purchased from BBL,
Becton-Dickinson, Cockeysville, Md.
Strains tested.
Strains were fresh clinical isolates from the
Clinical Microbiology Laboratory of the Miriam Hospital. The number of
isolates tested per species are as follows: 101 isolates of
Escherichia coli, 74 isolates of coagulase-negative
staphylococci, 53 isolates of Staphylococcus aureus, 28 isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 25 isolates of
Klebsiella pneumoniae, 15 isolates of Serratia marcescens, 13 isolates of Klebsiella oxytoca, 13 isolates of Proteus mirabilis, 12 isolates of
Enterobacter cloacae, 8 isolates of Citrobacter
freundii, 8 isolates of Acinetobacter baumanii, 8 isolates of S. maltophilia, 7 isolates of Enterobacter
aerogenes, and 1 isolate each of Serratia liquefaciens,
Proteus penneri, and Salmonella sp. Thirty-five
percent were urine isolates, 21% were from sputum, 19% were from
blood, 11% were from wounds, and the remainder came from miscellaneous sources.
Control strains were E. coli ATCC 25922, P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853, and S. aureus ATCC 25923.
Zone diameter readings with a ruler.
A technologist
experienced in reading zones with a ruler placed the Kirby-Bauer (K-B)
plate (150-mm diameter and round) on a view box with reflected light
against a black background and measured the zone diameters manually.
She dictated the readings to a colleague who recorded the results. When
performing repeat readings of multiple plates, the technologist cycled
the different plates.
Caliper readings.
Six technologists in the clinical
microbiology laboratory participated in these studies. They placed the
K-B plates on the viewer and measured zones by using a digital caliper
(Sylvac; Fowler Tools and Instruments, Boston, Mass.) connected to a
foot pedal. When the pedal was depressed, the zone diameter
automatically entered a database (WHONET) on a desktop personal computer.
Sirscan readings.
After putting the K-B plate on a sliding
tray, a keystroke initiates the zone readings. An image of the plate
appears on the screen, with the zone diameters encircled by a green
(susceptible), yellow (intermediate), or red (resistant) circle. At
this point the reader can modify the zone readings. Another keystroke
automatically enters the values into the Sirscan database. The timing
tests performed on the quality control strains and the three clinical isolates were done without modifying the Sirscan readings. In the
prospective study of 368 clinical isolates, the reader did not adjust
the Sirscan readings (automatic readings) with the first 114 isolates;
the remainder were adjusted as judgment dictated (reviewed readings).
Timing studies.
A stopwatch was used to time all readings.
Timing began when the technologist commenced reading the zone sizes of
the K-B plate on the viewer. With the Sirscan, timing began when the
keystroke initiated the reading of the K-B plate in the loading tray.
Time required to measure zone diameters.
Table
1 shows the results of
readings of clinical isolates of S. aureus, E. coli, and Morganella morganii by the
three different methods. The median time to read the 12 disk diameters
on the plates with gram-negative bacilli was 39 s by ruler,
28 s by caliper, and 11 seconds by Sirscan.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1.
Repeated zone diameter measurements of three clinical
isolates and three quality control strains by ruler, caliper,
and Sirscan
|
|
Reading the eight disks on the
S. aureus plate took 27 s by ruler, 18 s by caliper, and 11 s by Sirscan. The reading
times
of four different technologists using the caliper ranged from
24 to 41 s for the
E. coli plates, 22 to 44 s for the
M. morganii plates, and 17 to 31 s for the
S. aureus plates. Sirscan reading
times varied between 10 and 12 s. Similar results were observed
with the control
strains.
Zone size variation upon repeated testing.
Zone sizes of
control strains varied by more than 2 mm in 1 of 340 (0.3%)
determinations by Sirscan and 6 of 297 (2.0%) readings by caliper.
With three clinical isolates, zone diameters varied more than 2 mm in 4 of 297 (1.3%) readings by Sirscan and 7 of 330 (2.1%) readings by
caliper. Variation exceeded 3 mm in 4 of 1,254 (0.3%) readings.
Comparison of zone sizes measured by a Sirscan automated reader
with those measured by caliper.
Over a 4-month period, 368 fresh
clinical isolates were tested prospectively by both methods in the
Clinical Microbiology Laboratory. Correlation of zone diameter sizes
was very good with penicillin, vancomycin, and ampicillin disks (Fig.
1). There was also good correlation of
diameters for oxacillin and amoxicillin-clavulanate, although Sirscan
failed to detect light growth around the oxacillin disk in 3 of 131 (2.3%) isolates and around the amoxicillin-clavulanate disk in 2 of
219 isolates (0.9%) (Fig. 2).
Correlation of zone sizes was good, but not as tight, for imipenem and
cephalothin, perhaps due to species-specific variation in growth
around these disks (Fig. 3). In this
regard, zone diameters around imipenem disks were 2 to 3 mm larger by
Sirscan than by caliper with the control clinical isolates of M. morganii, but not with the E. coli or P. aeruginosa isolates.

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Correlation of zone diameters as measured with a Sirscan
image analyzer to caliper readings. Dark lines represent the NCCLS
breakpoints. , automatic reading; X, reviewed reading. (A)
Penicillin disk with 127 clinical isolates of staphylococci. (B)
Vancomycin disk with 127 staphylococci. (C) Ampicillin disk with 209 gram-negative isolates.
|
|

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Correlation of zone diameters as measured with a Sirscan
image analyzer to caliper readings. , automatic reading; X, reviewed
reading. (A) Oxacillin disk with 53 clinical isolates of S. aureus and 74 coagulase-negative staphylococci. (B)
Amoxicillin-clavulanate disk with 127 staphylococci and 87 gram-negative bacilli. The NCCLS breakpoints are not shown because they
differ for the different groups of bacteria.
|
|

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Correlation of zone diameters as measured with a Sirscan
image analyzer to caliper readings. Dark lines represent the NCCLS
breakpoints. , automatic reading; X, reviewed reading. (A) Imipenem
disk with 241 gram-negative isolates. (B) Cephalothin disk with 210 gram-negative isolates.
|
|
Sirscan zone diameter measurements tended to be 3 to 5 mm larger than
caliper readings around ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin,
aztreonam,
trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and nitrofurantoin disks
when testing
gram-negative bacilli (Fig.
4) and around
erythromycin
and clindamycin disks with staphylococci (Fig.
5). The effect
tended to be more
pronounced the larger the zone diameter, especially
with
nitrofurantoin. A less pronounced shift of zone
sizes, about
2 to 3 mm greater with Sirscan than by caliper, occurred
with
piperacillin, mezlocillin, cefuroxime, cefotaxime, and gentamicin
(Fig.
6). There was little difference in
these shifts between
the automatic and reviewed readings.

View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Correlation of zone diameters as measured with a Sirscan
image analyzer to caliper readings. Dark lines represent the NCCLS
breakpoints. , automatic reading; X, reviewed reading. (A)
Ciprofloxacin disk with 278 staphylococci and gram-negative bacilli.
(B) Aztreonam disk with 241 gram-negative isolates. (C)
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole disk with 366 staphylococci and
gram-negative bacilli. (D) Nitrofurantoin disk with 115 staphylococci
and gram-negative bacilli. Norfloxacin readings are not shown.
|
|

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Correlation of zone diameters as measured with a Sirscan
image analyzer to caliper readings. Dark lines represent the NCCLS
breakpoints. , automatic reading; X, reviewed reading. (A)
Erythromycin disk with 127 clinical isolates of staphylococci. (B)
Clindamycin disk with 127 clinical isolates of staphylococci.
|
|

View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Correlation of zone diameters as measured with a Sirscan
image analyzer to caliper readings. Dark lines represent the NCCLS
breakpoints. , automatic reading; X, reviewed reading. (A)
Piperacillin disk with 28 Pseudomonas and 124 other
gram-negative isolates. (B) Cefuroxime disk with 209 gram-negative
isolates. (C) Cefotaxime disk with 209 gram-negative isolates.
(D) Gentamicin disk with 364 isolates of staphylococci and
gram-negative bacilli. Mezlocillin readings are not shown.
|
|
Very major errors (resistant by caliper and susceptible by Sirscan)
occurred with 10 of 3,770 (0.3%) readings (Table
2).
Eight of the 10 very major errors
were with antibiotic disks that
had no intermediate zone separating the
resistant and susceptible
populations. They occurred in testing
staphylococci with amoxicillin-clavulanate
(5 of 128, 3.9%),
pseudomonas with piperacillin (1 of 28, 3.6%),
coagulase-negative
staphylococci with oxacillin (2 of 74, 2.7%),
gram-negative bacilli
with cefuroxime (1 of 209, 0.5%), and mixed
species with
trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (1 of 366, 0.3%). The
percentages of results that were very major errors were not
statistically
different between the automatic and reviewed readings.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 2.
Isolates susceptible, intermediate, or resistant as
determined by caliper and Sirscan readings of zone diameters
|
|
Discussion.
The Sirscan image analyzer reads zone diameters
more than twice as rapidly as skilled technologists using a computer
interfaced caliper system. Reproducibility of measurements was
excellent, within about 1 mm for Sirscan and 3 mm for caliper readings.
The latter, however, tended to vary with the technologist, unlike readings made with the Sirscan.
With regard to concordance of zone diameter measurements, the Sirscan
often failed to detect light growth at the margins ("beach
effect")
of the inhibition zones of some disks. Consequently,
zone
diameters measured by Sirscan were significantly larger for
ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin, aztreonam, erythromycin, clindamycin,
and
trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. However, these differences
rarely
affected the classification of the isolate as susceptible
or resistant.
The overall frequency of very major errors (resistant
by caliper and
susceptible by Sirscan) was low, i.e., 0.3% (10/3,770
readings).
Three of these errors occurred with the oxacillin disk,
reflecting the
difficulty of visualizing the light growth that
sometimes occurs around
the oxacillin disk with resistant
S. aureus organisms.
Another possible source of error is failure to swab
the K-B plate
thoroughly. If growth is not confluent, the Sirscan
may read
between the growth. A technician screening the Sirscan
readings prior
to validation and modifying them as needed can
minimize these
errors.
A study comparing the Sirscan readings to manual readings done in four
laboratories in France reported a higher rate (1.76%)
of very major
errors, which varied according to species, antibiotic,
and hospital
(
1).
Burkholderia cepacia,
Staphylococcus
epidermidis,
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and
Branhamella isolates were especially
problematical.
Differences between the two studies are probably
due to the mix of
species and antibiotics tested. For example,
our study did not include
Branhamella isolates and the antibiotics
fosfomycin and
cefoperazone, which had high discordance rates.
Interestingly, their
study showed that square petri dishes yielded
more reliable results
than round
dishes.
The Sirscan image analyzer merits strong consideration as a method of
measuring and recording zone diameters. It provides
a fully
quantitative measure of antibiotic resistance, an important
parameter
for tracking emerging mechanisms of resistance and their
spread in
hospital bacteria (
2). The computer interface with
an expert
system that screens each result according to user-defined
algorithms
enhances quality control. It also would make it feasible
to employ
species-specific breakpoints if and when such criteria
are developed
(
3,
5). A limitation of the Sirscan is its
inability to read
plates inoculated with enterococcus or haemophilus
species due to their
light
growth.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We are grateful to Louise Alaownis, Nancy Miller, Susan
Mitchison, Susan Rainone, Leslie Roop, and Lorraine Sinesi for
performing expert caliper readings.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Miriam Hospital,
164 Summit Ave., Providence, RI 02906. Phone: (401) 793-4622. Fax: (401) 751-2398. E-mail: Antone_Medeiros{at}brown.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Acar, J.,
O. Bellon,
H. Chardon,
J. Charrel,
F. Goldstein,
R. Labia, and J. Sirot.
1997.
[Statistical study of the SIRSCAN computerized camera].
Pathol. Biol.
45:383-388[Medline]. [In French.]
|
| 2.
|
ASM Task Force on Antibiotic Resistance.
1995.
Report of the ASM Task Force on Antibiotic Resistance.
American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
|
| 3.
|
Furtado, G. L., and A. A. Medeiros.
1980.
Single-disk diffusion testing (Kirby-Bauer) of susceptibility of Proteus mirabilis to chloramphenicol: significance of the intermediate category.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
12:550-553[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
National Committee on Clinical Laboratory Standards.
1999.
Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests. NCCLS document M2-A6, vol. 19.
, no. 1. National Committee on Clinical Laboratory Standards. Wayne, Pa.
|
| 5.
|
Ringertz, S.,
B. Olsson-Liljequist,
G. Kahlmeter, and G. Kronvall.
1997.
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing in Sweden. II. Species-related zone diameter breakpoints to avoid interpretive errors and guard against unrecognized evolution of resistance.
Scand. J. Infect. Dis.
29:8-12.
|
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2000, p. 1688-1693, Vol. 38, No. 4
0095-1137/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Hocquet, D., Nordmann, P., El Garch, F., Cabanne, L., Plesiat, P.
(2006). Involvement of the MexXY-OprM Efflux System in Emergence of Cefepime Resistance in Clinical Strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
50: 1347-1351
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Nijs, A., Cartuyvels, R., Mewis, A., Peeters, V., Rummens, J. L., Magerman, K.
(2003). Comparison and Evaluation of Osiris and Sirscan 2000 Antimicrobial Susceptibility Systems in the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory. J. Clin. Microbiol.
41: 3627-3630
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hocquet, D., Bertrand, X., Kohler, T., Talon, D., Plesiat, P.
(2003). Genetic and Phenotypic Variations of a Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Epidemic Clone. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
47: 1887-1894
[Abstract]
[Full Text]