Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, June 2000, p. 2284-2291, Vol. 38, No. 6
National Reference Centre of Hygiene and
Institute of Environmental Medicine and Hospital Epidemiology,
University Hospital Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg,1 and Institute of Medical
Microbiology and Hygiene, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Hochhaus
Augustusplatz, D-55101 Mainz,2 Germany
Received 1 November 1999/Returned for modification 13 January
2000/Accepted 10 April 2000
The increased incidence of nosocomial Legionnaires' disease in two
hospitals prompted investigation of possible environmental sources. In
the search for an effective DNA-typing technique for use in hospital
epidemiology, the performance and convenience of three
methods Fatality rates of nosocomial
pneumonia due to Legionella can be higher than 50%, even
when treated appropriately (5). An increased incidence of
Legionnaires' disease in a specific setting requires a search for the
environmental source. To assess nosocomial infections and their
sources, routine methods in hospital epidemiology are to record the
length of hospital stay and to determine the serogroup of the
Legionella pneumophila isolate. However, determination of
the serogroup is of limited value, especially as L. pneumophila serogroup 1 is a common contaminant of the water
supply and the most common clinical isolate. Genotyping bacteria has
become a helpful tool in hospital epidemiology to establish
transmission pathways and to focus expensive prevention measures on the
actual reservoir of nosocomial infection.
Macrorestriction analysis (MRA) and serotyping of the subgroups of
L. pneumophila serogroup 1 are well-established methods for
the typing of L. pneumophila isolates. However, they are
often restricted to a few reference laboratories which have the
necessary skills, expensive equipment, or access to a collection
of monoclonal antibodies. Therefore, numerous PCR-based typing
protocols have been introduced, which are based upon random
amplification of genomic DNA (36, 37). However,
reproducibility of arbitrarily primed PCR (AP-PCR) typing methods is
reported to be low (18, 29), unless detailed consensus
protocols are defined and followed strictly (12). Moreover,
they result in complex fingerprinting patterns, which at best have to
be analyzed by means of DNA sequencing gels, using automated laser
fluorescence analysis systems, and compared unambiguously with
specialized software (11, 35). Another principle of
PCR-based typing relies on restriction site-directed procedures
(17, 34). Yet, the value of genotyping is reduced by the
lack of consensus protocols and of commonly accepted criteria for the
analysis of the typing data of L. pneumophila for outbreak investigation or even for epidemiological surveillance.
This report describes for the first time the use of genotyping by means
of amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) (30) in
comparison to the "gold standard" of MRA (24) and a
protocol based on the widespread principle of AP-PCR (9) in
the reality of ongoing outbreaks in two hospitals. A common,
predominant genotype L. pneumophila serogroup 1 found in the
isolates of patients and the isolates of patient-related water sources
suggests the hospital water supply as being the source of an increased
incidence of nosocomial infection. These techniques, which are known to
differ in terms of equipment, time, and skill required, were studied in
terms of reproducibility, concordance with the epidemiological data,
and their simplicity in obtaining and interpreting the DNA fingerprint
data. These are evaluation criteria for both categories, i.e., the
performance and convenience of typing systems (26).
(Parts of this work were presented at the 14th Meeting of the European
Working Group for Legionella Infections, Dresden, Germany, 27 to 29 June 1999 [D. Jonas, D. Hartung, B. Jahn, B. Jansen, H. G. Meyer,
and F. D. Daschner, Abstr. 14th Meet. Eur. Working Group
Legionella Infect. 1999, abstr. 24, 1999]).
Bacterial strains.
This study investigated 37 isolates of
L. pneumophila serogroup 1, of which 29 were related to
Legionella infection at two hospitals, one in Mainz (M),
central Germany, and the other in Freiburg (F), south Germany (Table
1). Strains of L. pneumophila were coded with a number preceded by the letter M or F to indicate the
hospital from which they originated. Patients were suspected of having
contracted a nosocomial infection (i) if they had been hospitalized for
more than 2 days before the onset of illness or (ii) if they had been
discharged from the hospital and readmitted soon after with signs and
symptoms of Legionnaires' disease and (iii) if the L. pneumophila strain's serogroup causing the infection was isolated
from the hospital's water supply system. The association of isolates
with an outbreak was originally defined on the basis of these
epidemiological investigations in the hospital. Additionally, this
study included five isolates from community-acquired pneumonia and
three type strains of L. pneumophila serogroup 1.
0095-1137/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Comparative Evaluation of Three Different Genotyping Methods for
Investigation of Nosocomial Outbreaks of Legionnaires' Disease
in Hospitals
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
SfiI macrorestriction analysis (MRA), amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP), and arbitrarily primed PCR (AP-PCR)were compared. Twenty-nine outbreak-associated and eight nonassociated strains of Legionella pneumophila with 13 MRA
types and subtypes were investigated. These strains comprised isolates from bronchoalveolar lavages, from environmental, patient-related sources, and type strains. All three typing methods detected one predominant genotype associated with the outbreaks in both hospitals. All of them correctly assigned epidemiologically associated,
environmental isolates to their respective patient specimens. AP-PCR
was the least discriminating and least reproducible technique. In
contrast, AFLP was demonstrated as being the method with the best
interassay reproducibility (90%) and concordance (94%) in comparison
to the genotyping standard of MRA and the epidemiological data.
Analysis of AFLP fragments revealed 12 different types and subtypes.
Because of its simplicity and reproducibility, AFLP proved to be the
most effective technique in outbreak investigation.
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
TABLE 1.
Epidemiologic data of the outbreak-associated isolates
from patients and drinking water
and modified Wadowsky-Yee medium agar (Heipha, Heidelberg, Germany).
Legionella organisms from respiratory tract specimens were
isolated and cultured on BCYE agar (Heipha). All specimens were
grown in 5% CO2 at 37°C for 10 days. The genus
Legionella was identified by standard microbiological
methods and PCR as described elsewhere (15). Species were
identified by direct immunofluorescence testing with fluorescein
isothiocyanate-conjugated anti-Legionella monoclonal antibodies (Gull Laboratories, Bad Homburg, Germany). Serogroups were
determined by agglutination with specific monoclonal rabbit antibodies
(21).
MRA of genomic DNAs by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). MRA patterns were obtained by SfiI digestion employing either the GenePath group 5 reagent kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, Calif.) or self-made reagents produced by modifying a published protocol (24). Briefly, bacteria resuspended in suspension buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 900 mM NaCl, 25 mM EDTA) were embedded in agarose and lysed in lysis buffer (6 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.6], 1 M NaCl, 100 mM EDTA) containing 1 mg of lysozyme (Boehringer Mannheim) per ml, 0.06 mg of DNase-free RNase A (Sigma) per ml, 0.5% Brij 58, 0.2% deoxycholate, and 0.5% N-laurosylsarkosine for 1 h at 37°C. Subsequently, proteins were removed in proteinase K buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8], 0.5 M EDTA) containing 2 mg of proteinase K (Boehringer Mannheim) per ml and 1% N-laurosylsarkosine. After extensive washing and equilibration in SfiI buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 10 mM MgCl2, 50 mM NaCl), DNA in each plug was restricted with 25 U of SfiI (Boehringer Mannheim) for 16 h at 50°C and overlaid with 250 µl of mineral oil (Sigma).
Plugs containing cleaved DNA were loaded into slots of a 1% agarose gel in 0.5× Tris-borate-EDTA buffer. Lambda concatemers (Bio-Rad) were used as size markers. Separation was accomplished with the contour-clamped homogeneous electric field (CHEF DR II) system (Bio-Rad). Running conditions were 200 V for 19.3 h at 14°C with switch times of 5.3 s (initial) and 49.9 s (final). After ethidium bromide staining, the gels were photographed with a UV light source. The macrorestriction fragments of all 37 strains were compared visually. A new PFGE type was assigned a capital letter if the pattern differed by more than three bands. If the difference was three bands or less, then a numerical suffix was allocated. To give a conclusive picture of the different macrorestriction patterns, a gel displaying all 13 different PFGE types and subtypes was photographed. This image was recorded with a Scan IIP (Hewlett-Packard Co., Vancouver, Wash.) and analyzed by means of GelCompar software (Applied Maths, Kortrijk, Belgium). A similarity matrix was created by using the band-based Dice similarity coefficient. The unweighted pair group method using arithmetic averages was used to cluster the strains on the basis of the SfiI macrorestriction patterns.AP-PCR. Colonies (three to five) from a freshly grown culture were resuspended in 100 µl of TE buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 0.1 mM EDTA) in a microcentrifuge tube and incubated for 15 min at 95°C. After chilling on ice, bacterial debris was pelleted by centrifugation at 15,000 × g for 20 s. The supernatant was transferred into a fresh microcentrifuge tube.
The AP-PCR was essentially performed as described previously (9, 22). The M13 primer (5' TTA TGT AAA ACG ACG GCC AGT 3') used for typing was fluorescently labelled with Cy-5 during manufacture (Pharmacia Biotech, Freiburg, Germany). PCR was performed in a total volume of 25 µl, with 1 µl of the bacterial lysate being added to a PCR mix comprising 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 9.0), 3 mM MgCl2, 50 mM KCl, 0.2 mM deoxynucleoside triphosphates (Pharmacia Biotech), and 1.25 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Boehringer Mannheim). The PCR comprised 45 cycles of 60 s at 94°C, 60 s at 36°C, and 120 s at 72°C and a final extension step at 72°C for 2 min. PCR products were detected by analysis of a 1.2-µl portion on an ALF Express DNA Sequencer (Pharmacia) as described previously (12). Fingerprints in the range of 120 to 1,000 nucleotides (nt) were analyzed by means of GelCompar software. After conversion, normalization, and background subtraction with mathematical algorithms, the degree of similarity between fingerprints was calculated with the Pearson product moment correlation coefficient. Cluster analysis was performed with the unweighted pair group method using arithmetic averages.AFLP. Typing of Legionella isolates by AFLP was performed according to a previously described protocol (30) except that Cy-5 fluorescently labeled PstI-G primers were used for DNA amplification. Briefly, purified DNA was prepared by digesting half a loop of bacteria resuspended in 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) and 1 mM EDTA with 50 µg of proteinase K per ml and 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate and subsequent extraction of potential inhibitors with 1% hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide, chloroform, and phenol-chloroform-isoamylalcohol. After ethanol precipitation, DNA was resolved in 20 µl of 1 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) and 0.1 mM EDTA.
Restriction and ligation was performed simultaneously in 20 µl of ligase buffer (10 mM Tris [pH 7.5], 10 mM magnesium acetate, 50 mM potassium acetate, 2 mM dithiothreitol, 0.5 mM ATP) containing 2 µl of the DNA, 0.2 µg of each adapter oligonucleotide (5'-CTC GTA GAC TGC GTA CAT GCA and 5'-TGT ACG CAG TCT AC), 20 U of PstI, and 1 U of T4 DNA ligase (both from Boehringer Mannheim). After incubation for 3 h at 37°C, ammonium acetate was added to a final molarity of 2.5 M. Ligated DNA was selectively precipitated with 1 volume of ice-cold 98% ethanol for 5 min at ambient temperature. After centrifugation at 10,000 × g and washing with 75% ethanol, the dried pellet was dissolved in 20 µl of 1 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) and 0.1 mM EDTA. Before PCR, this DNA was diluted 1:100 with 1 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0). The amplification reaction was performed in a final volume of 25 µl containing 1 µl of the diluted DNA, 75 ng of the Cy-5 fluorescently labeled PstI-G primer (5'-GAC TGC GTA CAT GCA GG), 0.2 mM deoxynucleoside triphosphates (both from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), 5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 9.0), 50 mM KCl, and 1 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Boehringer Mannheim). The PCR comprised 33 cycles of 60 s at 94°C, 60 s at 60°C, and 150 s at 72°C and a final extension step at 72°C for 5 min. Detection of the fluorescent AFLP (fAFLP) products was performed by automated laser fluorescence analysis as described above for the AP-PCR. The lengths of different PCR products smaller than 1,000 nt in size were determined by means of the Fragment Manager software V1.2 (Pharmacia). In a second approach, PCR products were separated by agarose gel electrophoresis (1% agarose, 1× TBE buffer, 1 µg of ethidium bromide/ml, 140 V for 3 h). Fragment lengths in the range of 500 to 1,636 bp were calculated by determination of the electrophoretic mobility in comparison to fragments of strains which were previously exactly determined by sequencing gels and in comparison to the size marker X (Boehringer Mannheim). Each isolate was characterized by the presence or absence of defined fragments in a fragment size table, and the number of band differences was counted. A new AFLP type was assigned a lowercase letter if the pattern differed by more than one band. If the pattern differed by one band, a numerical suffix was allocated to designate a subtype.| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
|
|---|
Epidemiology of outbreaks. At hospital M, reexamination of clinical microbiology reports revealed repeated nosocomial infection between 1992 and 1998. Of 14 patients, eight had been hospitalized for at least 2 weeks prior to diagnosis (Table 1). At hospital F, an increase in the incidence of Legionnaires' disease was observed over a period of half a year. L. pneumophila serogroup 1 organisms were found in patients and their direct drinking water supply. As indicated in Table 1, in the case of three infections, the length of hospital stay before diagnosis could not be stated precisely. Two patients had been treated daily as outpatients at the hospital before onset of illness (M20, M32). Another patient (F131), though hospitalized for more than a month, spent every second night at a boardinghouse outside the hospital. Table 1 lists 21 strains isolated during the ongoing outbreak in hospital M and eight strains related to the increased incidence observed over 7 months at hospital F. In five cases, isolates of serogroup 1 were obtained directly from the faucets or showers in sickrooms soon after the onset of illness.
Patients with nosocomial Legionnaires' disease were either transplant recipients or had underlying diseases, such as myasthenia gravis, neurofibromatosis, forms of leukemia, or nonhematologic malignancies. Patients with community-acquired pneumonia had predisposing factors, such as leukemia, smoking, diabetes mellitus, or advanced age. The occurrence of nosocomial legionellosis ceased at both hospitals after 0.2-µm-pore-size filter units were installed on the faucets in rooms occupied by patients at risk. Additionally, eight isolates of L. pneumophila serogroup 1 which were not associated with the outbreaks were included to cover a greater number of different genotypes in this study. These consisted of three type strains and five isolates from patients with community-acquired pneumonia (Table 2).
|
Macrorestriction analysis.
The SfiI
macrorestriction analysis of the predominant clones causing the
outbreaks in the two hospitals are shown in Fig. 1. Remarkably, though some 300 km apart,
isolates from the two hospitals showed some degree of similarity. There
were two-fragment differences between the various isolates from
hospital F. Comparison of these prevailing types, B1 and B2, with the
predominant type A from hospital M showed only four and six different
bands, respectively.
|
|
AP-PCR typing.
Typing results for 33 strains by means of
AP-PCR cluster analysis are shown in Fig.
3. Cophenetic correlation of the
dendrogram was 95%. All five epidemiologically linked isolates from
patients and their immediate environment had a similarity of >75%.
All isolates from both outbreaks with the predominant PFGE types A and
B were grouped together in a cluster. A similarity of 
77% ± 10%
(mean ± standard deviation [SD]) was measured.
|
) and hospital F (
) are marked. Isolates of the same genotype,
which were epidemiologically linked, i.e., organisms from patients
(Pat) and their immediate environment (such as faucets [Fau] or
showers [Shw]), are indicated by vertical bars at the right site of
the dendrogram. The arrow denotes the cutting level for separation
clusters and single strains. Stippled boxes in the dendrogram indicate
SDs with respect to the similarity matrix for every branch of the
dendrogram.
Interassay reproducibility of PCR-based typing.
All AP-PCR
experiments were performed with one lot of reagents. However, the
interassay reproducibility of AP-PCR proved to be low. Fingerprints of
the same strains generated in four independent experiments were
compared for similarity (Table 3). The
Pearson correlation coefficient might be as low as 57 or 54% (ATCC
33152 and RIVM 83-147, respectively), which is below the cutoff value indicating different AP-PCR genotypes. This actually implies that a
comparison of new isolates with previous ones requires a reanalysis of
all isolatesthe new ones and the strains already typedwithin a
single experiment. In contrast, reanalysis experiments with AFLP
demonstrated an interassay reproducibility of at least 84% (ATCC
33152), a value also useful for discrimination between related and
unrelated strains.
|
Fluorescent AFLP typing using ALF Express.
All strains were
typed by means of fAFLP and analyzed in the same manner as the AP-PCR
fingerprints (Fig. 4). Due to the high interassay reproducibility, data from two gels comprising all the 37 isolates were combined for a single cluster analysis. Cophenetic correlation of the dendrogram was 97%. All five epidemiologically related isolates from patients and their direct drinking water source
had a similarity of >92%. The isolates from outbreak M with PFGE type
A were grouped in a cluster with a similarity of >90%. Yet, these
results were not statistically significant, as indicated by the error
bars (Fig. 4). Isolates from the two outbreaks with the predominant
PFGE type A and B were grouped in a cluster. A similarity of 89% ± 4% (mean ± SD) was measured. On this basis, a cutoff of 85%
similarity was taken to discriminate nine different genotypes by
cluster analysis (Table 2).
|
AFLP typing by means of agarose gel. Since the protocol of AFLP typing by means of agarose gel employs just one restriction enzyme, the fingerprints are less complex. Therefore, it was investigated next whether similar typing results might be obtained by the use of ordinary agarose gel electrophoresis available in any PCR laboratory.
The AFLP products were separated on agarose gels. The fragment sizes, in the range 500 to 1,636 bp, were estimated in comparison with data defined by the previous sequencer-based analysis (500 to 1,000 nt) and in comparison to DNA size standards (1,000 to 1,636 bp). A fragment size table representing all the different types of fingerprints is shown in Table 4. These data proved to be at least as useful as the even more convenient computer-based analysis of fAFLP fingerprints. Moreover, additional differences within three fAFLP types could be demonstrated, since fragments larger than 1,000 bp in size, which cannot be separated under the denaturing sequencing gel conditions used, were taken into account.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
|
|---|
The increased incidence of Legionnaires' disease required clarification of a possible nosocomial mode of transmission. The length of hospital stay before onset of clinical signs or even diagnosis could not prove a hospital-acquired infection in all the cases presented because the incubation period varies from 2 to 10 days (38) and three patients were not hospitalized continuously. In the case of one patient (F131), no corresponding environmental isolate could be found, though all conceivable water sources (F134, F135, F136) were investigated. It might be that the patient acquired the infectious strain outside the hospital during overnight stays in the nearby boardinghouse. Water samples outside the hospital were not investigated. However, in the case of two other patients treated continuously as outpatients (M20, M32), a clear link to the hospital water supply could be shown.
The predominance of one genotype in patient specimens seemed to suggest transmission from common sources. Since L. pneumophila is also ubiquitously found in water supplies without history of any cases, the actual causative, infectious reservoir should be demonstrated by means of typing methods to enforce allocation of financial resources for prevention measures.
The importance of this issue in hospital epidemiology is reflected by the multitude of techniques proposed for the last 15 years, such as plasmid typing (19), serotyping (14), multilocus enzyme electrophoresis (25), or different restriction enzyme-based methods, such as restriction fragment length polymorphism (33), Southern hybridization (23), ribotyping (1), and MRA by means of PFGE (20, 24). In general, the latter is considered to be a gold standard, especially when combined with serotyping. However, the use of MRA is confined to specialized centers, because expensive equipment and special skills are required. Monoclonal antibodies for serotyping are not available commercially and antibody-producing hybridoma cell lines are maintained in only a few reference centers.
Therefore, multiple, simple PCR-based approaches for the typing of Legionella organisms have been proposed, such as AP-PCR (2, 9, 10, 22) or rep-PCR (7, 31).
In this study, we report the suitability of applying two variably demanding PCR-based DNA typing techniques and MRA in hospital epidemiology during two nosocomial outbreaks of Legionnaires' disease. Working on the premise that an outbreak constitutes at least two cases of nosocomial infection occurring at one institution within a half-year period, we found one outbreak at hospital M involving 11 patients with prevailing PFGE type A and one outbreak at hospital F involving two patients with the predominant subtypes B1 and B2. All three genotyping methods revealed the predominant genotypes in both hospitals.
In five cases, isolates were obtained from the direct faucets or the shower in sickrooms soon after the onset of illness. In these cases all three genotyping methods established an unambiguous link between the strains isolated from the patients and the ones isolated from their immediate drinking water supply.
Use of SfiI MRA resulted in the largest number of genotypes. This was the only technique to reveal minor genetic differences between isolates of outbreak F. However, even employment of this expensive equipment was found to have limitations. One clinical isolate (M33) could not be distinguished from the Bellingham I type strain (ATCC 43111), even by MRA. Yet, it is unreasonable to assume an epidemiologic relation between these two strains. Several isolates showed a banding pattern similar to that of type E, though they originated from entirely different European regions, such as Crete (F64) and central (M5) and southern (F65) Germany. Thus, even typing by means of MRA can suggest epidemiologic links erroneously. Apart from the technical demands and the workload, an unambiguous, visual interpretation and comparison of a larger number of PFGE patterns is rather tedious.
On the other hand, AP-PCR, the simplest technique employed here, is suitable for processing isolates within a short time, particularly if the fingerprints are resolved by means of automated laser fluorescence analysis and the primarily digitized data are interpreted with the help of computer programs. However, only seven different genotypes were distinguished here. As reported by others (18, 29), reproducibility of AP-PCR is low, which renders comparison of new fingerprints in ongoing or repeated outbreaks with previous ones more difficult. Typing data cannot be stored in a database for future comparison. All previous strains representing the different genotypes have to be reanalyzed together with the new isolate in the same experiment. Therefore, the number of isolates which can be analyzed ultimately depends on the number of gel lanes available.
AP-PCR experiments in this report were not performed using strictly standardized manufactured reagents (e.g., Ready-To-Go RAPD beads supplied by Pharmacia). If they had been, reproducibility might have improved, but it was not considered prudent to rely on a continuous supply of special PCR reagents and polyacrylamide formulations from one manufacturer. Even more demanding typing approaches have shown the limitations of this general idea (32). Moreover, AP-PCR patterns are too complex to be described in detail and to be exchanged between different laboratories without the aid of special software. This sort of exchange may be of interest, e.g., in travel-associated legionellosis (16).
In contrast, the more recently introduced technique of AFLP features a high degree of reproducibility (13). This study proved AFLP to have an interassay reproducibility of 90%, which is high enough for comparing fingerprints from different experiments at different times. This is particularly effective in cases of continuous or repeated outbreaks when the fingerprints of new isolates can be compared with previous ones and then deposited in fingerprint pattern databases. Therefore, this method is suitable as a library typing system (27). An epidemiological surveillance of environmental spread and association with disease might show that strains with a certain genotype are more often associated with disease. In principle, this was already suggested by serotyping results 1 decade ago (4).
The AFLP technique, as described initially, includes two restriction enzymes and results in complex patterns of 30 to 50 different fragment sizes (34). Unlike these fingerprints, which have to be resolved by means of sequencing gels, less complex patterns are obtained by AFLP protocols employing just one restriction enzyme, which can be analyzed by simple agarose gels. This has been demonstrated for Chlamydia psittaci, Helicobacter pylori, and L. pneumophila (3, 8, 30).
In a basic approach in this study, AFLP fragments were also analyzed by means of agarose gels. Accordingly, it was possible to discriminate 12 types and subtypes; 35 of 37 isolates (94%) were typed in concordance with MRA.
In interpreting MRA patterns, it is assumed that one genetic difference will result in three PFGE fragment differences (28). Similarly, in terms of this AFLP method we assumed just one difference in PCR fragments because rearranged PstI fragments would most probably be too large for amplification by PCR. Therefore, isolates with one fragment difference were designated as subtypes. Interestingly, the fragment differences in MRA between isolates of outbreak F and M were mirrored by just one additional fragment in the outbreak F strains 1,415 bp in size. Patterns could even be interpreted in a simple fragment size table. They might be communicated between laboratories, provided fragment length can be precisely defined. This could be achieved by means of a small panel of well-chosen type strains representing most, if not all, AFLP fragment sizes.
Yet, analysis of AFLP patterns by means of automated laser fluorescence provides a more accurate definition of fragment sizes, an improved resolution of similarly large fragments, e.g., 710 and 720 bp, and a superior detection of smaller fragments, which are only faintly stained with ethidium bromide on agarose gels.
During investigation of different ongoing outbreaks of nosocomial Legionnaires' disease, we demonstrated that in terms of technical demands, reproducibility, and simplicity of the patterns, AFLP is the most effective typing method for application in standard hospital epidemiology laboratories. These findings correspond to a recently presented study employing a European strain collection (6). Using nosocomial Legionella infections as an example, this report once again demonstrates the impact of appropriate molecular typing in hospital infection control and prevention measures.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We are indebted to T. Harrison and N. Fry, Respiratory and Systemic Infection Laboratory, PHLS Central Public Health Laboratory, London, United Kingdom, and to C. Valsangiacomo, Laboratorio Cantonale, Lugano, Switzerland.
Parts of this study were supported by the Robert Koch-Institut, Berlin, Germany.
We thank Deborah Lawrie-Blum for assistance with the manuscript.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institute of Environmental Medicine and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106 Freiburg, Germany. Phone: 49-761-270.5445. Fax: 49-761-270.5485. E-mail: djonas{at}IUK3.UKL.uni-Freiburg.de.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
|
|---|
| 1. | Bangsborg, J. M., P. Gerner-Smidt, H. Colding, N. E. Fiehn, B. Bruun, and N. Hoiby. 1995. Restriction fragment length polymorphism of rRNA genes for molecular typing of members of the family Legionellaceae. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:402-406[Abstract]. |
| 2. | Bansal, N. S., and F. McDonell. 1997. Identification and DNA fingerprinting of Legionella strains by randomly amplified polymorphic DNA analysis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:2310-2314[Abstract]. |
| 3. | Boumedine, K. S., and A. Rodolakis. 1998. AFLP allows the identification of genomic markers of ruminant Chlamydia psittaci strains useful for typing and epidemiological studies. Res. Microbiol. 149:735-744[Medline]. |
| 4. | Dournon, E., W. F. Bibb, P. Rajagopalan, N. Desplaces, and R. M. McKinney. 1988. Monoclonal antibody reactivity as a virulence marker for Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 strains. J. Infect. Dis. 157:496-501[Medline]. |
| 5. | Edelstein, P. H. 1995. Antimicrobial chemotherapy for Legionnaires' disease: a review. Clin. Infect. Dis. 21(Suppl. 3):5265-5276. |
| 6. | Fry, N. K., S. Alexion-Daniel, J. M. Bangsborg, S. Bernander, M. Castellani-Pastoris, J. Etienne, B. Forsblom, V. Gaia, J. H. Helbig, D. Lindsay, P. C. Luck, C. Pelaz, S. A. Uldum, and T. G. Harrison. 1999. A multicenter evaluation of genotypic methods for epidemiologic typing of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1: results of a pan-European study. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 5:462-477[Medline]. |
| 7. |
Georghiou, P. R.,
A. M. Doggett,
M. A. Kielhofner,
J. E. Stout,
D. A. Watson,
J. R. Lupski, and R. J. Hamill.
1994.
Molecular fingerprinting of Legionella species by repetitive element PCR.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
32:2989-2994 |
| 8. |
Gibson, J. R.,
E. Slater,
J. Xerry,
D. S. Tompkins, and R. J. Owen.
1998.
Use of an amplified-fragment length polymorphism technique to fingerprint and differentiate isolates of Helicobacter pylori.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
36:2580-2585 |
| 9. |
Gomez-Lus, P.,
B. S. Fields,
R. F. Benson,
W. T. Martin,
S. P. O'Connor, and C. M. Black.
1993.
Comparison of arbitrarily primed polymerase chain reaction, ribotyping, and monoclonal antibody analysis for subtyping Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
31:1940-1942 |
| 10. | Grattard, F., P. Berthelot, M. Reyrolle, A. Ros, J. Etienne, and B. Pozzetto. 1996. Molecular typing of nosocomial strains of Legionella pneumophila by arbitrarily primed PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:1595-1598[Abstract]. |
| 11. |
Grundmann, H.,
C. Schneider,
H. V. Tichy,
R. Simon,
I. Klare,
D. Hartung, and F. D. Daschner.
1995.
Automated laser fluorescence analysis of randomly amplified polymorphic DNA: a rapid method for investigating nosocomial transmission of Acinetobacter baumannii.
J. Med. Microbiol.
43:446-451 |
| 12. | Grundmann, H. J., K. J. Towner, L. Dijkshoorn, P. Gerner-Smidt, M. Maher, H. Seifert, and M. Vaneechoutte. 1997. Multicenter study using standardized protocols and reagents for evaluation of reproducibility of PCR-based fingerprinting of Acinetobacter spp. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:3071-3077[Abstract]. |
| 13. |
Janssen, P.,
R. Coopman,
G. Huys,
J. Swings,
M. Bleeker,
P. Vos,
M. Zabeau, and K. Kersters.
1996.
Evaluation of the DNA fingerprinting method AFLP as a new tool in bacterial taxonomy.
Microbiology
142:1881-1893 |
| 14. |
Joly, J. R.,
R. M. McKinney,
J. O. Tobin,
W. F. Bibb,
I. D. Watkins, and D. Ramsay.
1986.
Development of a standardized subgrouping scheme for Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 using monoclonal antibodies.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
23:768-771 |
| 15. | Jonas, D., A. Rosenbaum, S. Weyrich, and S. Bhakdi. 1995. Enzyme-linked immunoassay for detection of PCR-amplified DNA of legionellae in bronchoalveolar fluid. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:1247-1252[Abstract]. |
| 16. | Joseph, C., D. Morgan, R. Birtles, C. Pelaz, C. Martin-Bourgon, M. Black, I. Garcia-Sanchez, M. Griffin, N. Bornstein, and C. Bartlett. 1996. An international investigation of an outbreak of Legionnaires' disease among UK and French tourists. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 12:215-219[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 17. | Mazurek, G. H., V. Reddy, B. J. Marston, W. H. Haas, and J. T. Crawford. 1996. DNA fingerprinting by infrequent-restriction-site amplification. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:2386-2390[Abstract]. |
| 18. | Meunier, J. R., and P. A. Grimont. 1993. Factors affecting reproducibility of random amplified polymorphic DNA fingerprinting. Res. Microbiol. 144:373-379[Medline]. |
| 19. | Nolte, F. S., C. A. Conlin, A. J. Roisin, and S. R. Redmond. 1984. Plasmids as epidemiological markers in nosocomial Legionnaires' disease. J. Infect. Dis. 149:251-256[Medline]. |
| 20. |
Ott, M.,
L. Bender,
R. Marre, and J. Hacker.
1991.
Pulsed field electrophoresis of genomic restriction fragments for the detection of nosocomial Legionella pneumophila in hospital water supplies.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
29:813-815 |
| 21. | Pietsch, M. 1993. Ph.D. thesis. Ernst Moritz Arndt-Universität Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany. |
| 22. | Pruckler, J. M., L. A. Mermel, R. F. Benson, C. Giorgio, P. K. Cassiday, R. F. Breiman, C. G. Whitney, and B. S. Fields. 1995. Comparison of Legionella pneumophila isolates by arbitrarily primed PCR and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: analysis from seven epidemic investigations. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:2872-2875[Abstract]. |
| 23. |
Saunders, N. A.,
T. G. Harrison,
A. Haththotuwa,
N. Kachwalla, and A. G. Taylor.
1990.
A method for typing strains of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 by analysis of restriction fragment length polymorphisms.
J. Med. Microbiol.
31:45-55 |
| 24. |
Schoonmaker, D.,
T. Heimberger, and G. Birkhead.
1992.
Comparison of ribotyping and restriction enzyme analysis using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for distinguishing Legionella pneumophila isolates obtained during a nosocomial outbreak.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
30:1491-1498 |
| 25. |
Selander, R. K.,
R. M. McKinney,
T. S. Whittam,
W. F. Bibb,
D. J. Brenner,
F. S. Nolte, and P. E. Pattison.
1985.
Genetic structure of populations of Legionella pneumophila.
J. Bacteriol.
163:1021-1037 |
| 26. | Struelens, M. J., A. Bauernfeind, A. Van Belkum, D. Blanc, B. D. Cookson, L. Dijkshoorn, N. El Solh, J. Etienne, J. Garaizar, P. Gerner-Smidt, N. Legakis, H. de Lencastre, M. H. Nicolas, T. L. Pitt, U. Romling, V. Rosdahl, and W. Witte. 1996. Consensus guidelines for appropriate use and evaluation of microbial epidemiologic typing systems. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2:2-11[Medline]. |
| 27. | Struelens, M. J., Y. De Gheldre, and A. Deplano. 1998. Comparative and library epidemiological typing systems: outbreak investigations versus surveillance systems. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 19:565-569[Medline]. |
| 28. | Tenover, F. C., R. D. Arbeit, R. V. Goering, P. A. Mickelsen, B. E. Murray, D. H. Persing, and B. Swaminathan. 1995. Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:2233-2239[Medline]. |
| 29. | Tyler, K. D., G. Wang, S. D. Tyler, and W. M. Johnson. 1997. Factors affecting reliability and reproducibility of amplification-based DNA fingerprinting of representative bacterial pathogens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:339-346[Medline]. |
| 30. | Valsangiacomo, C., F. Baggi, V. Gaia, T. Balmelli, R. Peduzzi, and J. C. Piffaretti. 1995. Use of amplified fragment length polymorphism in molecular typing of Legionella pneumophila and application to epidemiological studies. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:1716-1719[Abstract]. |
| 31. |
Van Belkum, A.,
M. Struelens, and W. Quint.
1993.
Typing of Legionella pneumophila strains by polymerase chain reaction-mediated DNA fingerprinting.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
31:2198-2200 |
| 32. |
Van Belkum, A.,
W. van Leeuwen,
M. E. Kaufmann,
B. Cookson,
F. Forey,
J. Etienne,
R. Goering,
F. Tenover,
C. Steward,
F. O'Brien,
W. Grubb,
P. Tassios,
N. Legakis,
A. Morvan,
N. El Solh,
R. de Ryck,
M. Struelens,
S. Salmenlinna,
J. Vuopio-Varkila,
M. Kooistra,
A. Talens,
W. Witte, and H. Verbrugh.
1998.
Assessment of resolution and intercenter reproducibility of results of genotyping Staphylococcus aureus by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of SmaI macrorestriction fragments: a multicenter study.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
36:1653-1659 |
| 33. |
van Ketel, R. J.,
J. ter Schegget, and H. C. Zanen.
1984.
Molecular epidemiology of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
20:362-364 |
| 34. |
Vos, P.,
R. Hogers,
M. Bleeker,
M. Reijans,
T. van de Lee,
M. Hornes,
A. Frijters,
J. Pot,
J. Peleman, and M. Kuiper.
1995.
AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting.
Nucleic Acids Res.
23:4407-4414 |
| 35. |
Webster, C. A.,
K. J. Towner,
H. Humphreys,
B. Ehrenstein,
D. Hartung, and H. Grundmann.
1996.
Comparison of rapid automated laser fluorescence analysis of DNA fingerprints with four other computer-assisted approaches for studying relationships between Acinetobacter baumannii isolates.
J. Med. Microbiol.
44:185-194 |
| 36. |
Welsh, J., and M. McClelland.
1990.
Fingerprinting genomes using PCR with arbitrary primers.
Nucleic Acids Res.
18:7213-7218 |
| 37. |
Williams, J. G.,
A. R. Kubelik,
K. J. Livak,
J. A. Rafalski, and S. V. Tingey.
1990.
DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers.
Nucleic Acids Res.
18:6531-6535 |
| 38. | Yu, V. L. 1995. Legionella pneumophila (Legionnaires' disease), p. 2087-2097. In G. L. Mandell, J. E. Bennet, and R. Dolin (ed.), Mandell, Douglas and Bennett's principles and practice of infectious disease. Churchill Livingstone, New York, N.Y. |
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, June 2000, p. 2284-2291, Vol. 38, No. 6
0095-1137/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Ni, Y., Wan, D., He, K.
(2008). 16S rDNA and 16S-23S internal transcribed spacer sequence analyses reveal inter- and intraspecific Acidithiobacillus phylogeny. Microbiology
154: 2397-2407
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Kalpoe, J. S., Templeton, K. E., Horrevorts, A. M., Endtz, H. P., Kuijper, E. J., Bernards, A. T., Klaassen, C. H. W.
(2007). Molecular Typing of a Suspected Cluster of Nocardia farcinica Infections by Use of Randomly Amplified Polymorphic DNA, Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis, and Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism Analyses. J. Clin. Microbiol.
45: 4048-4050
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Keto-Timonen, R., Heikinheimo, A., Eerola, E., Korkeala, H.
(2006). Identification of Clostridium Species and DNA Fingerprinting of Clostridium perfringens by Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis. J. Clin. Microbiol.
44: 4057-4065
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Rubin, C.-J., Thollesson, M., Kirsebom, L. A., Herrmann, B.
(2005). Phylogenetic relationships and species differentiation of 39 Legionella species by sequence determination of the RNase P RNA gene rnpB. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.
55: 2039-2049
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Aurell, H., Farge, P., Meugnier, H., Gouy, M., Forey, F., Lina, G., Vandenesch, F., Etienne, J., Jarraud, S.
(2005). Clinical and Environmental Isolates of Legionella pneumophila Serogroup 1 Cannot Be Distinguished by Sequence Analysis of Two Surface Protein Genes and Three Housekeeping Genes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
71: 282-289
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Huang, B., Heron, B. A., Gray, B. R., Eglezos, S., Bates, J. R., Savill, J.
(2004). A Predominant and Virulent Legionella pneumophila Serogroup 1 Strain Detected in Isolates from Patients and Water in Queensland, Australia, by an Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism Protocol and Virulence Gene-Based PCR Assays. J. Clin. Microbiol.
42: 4164-4168
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Gaia, V., Fry, N. K., Harrison, T. G., Peduzzi, R.
(2003). Sequence-Based Typing of Legionella pneumophila Serogroup 1 Offers the Potential for True Portability in Legionellosis Outbreak Investigation. J. Clin. Microbiol.
41: 2932-2939
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Bernander, S., Jacobson, K., Helbig, J. H., Luck, P. C., Lundholm, M.
(2003). A Hospital-Associated Outbreak of Legionnaires' Disease Caused by Legionella pneumophila Serogroup 1 Is Characterized by Stable Genetic Fingerprinting but Variable Monoclonal Antibody Patterns. J. Clin. Microbiol.
41: 2503-2508
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Pourcel, C., Vidgop, Y., Ramisse, F., Vergnaud, G., Tram, C.
(2003). Characterization of a Tandem Repeat Polymorphism in Legionella pneumophila and Its Use for Genotyping. J. Clin. Microbiol.
41: 1819-1826
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Jonas, D., Engels, I., Hartung, D., Beyersmann, J., Frank, U., Daschner, F. D.
(2003). Development and mechanism of fluoroquinolone resistance in Legionella pneumophila. J Antimicrob Chemother
51: 275-280
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Lan, R., Reeves, P. R.
(2002). Pandemic Spread of Cholera: Genetic Diversity and Relationships within the Seventh Pandemic Clone of Vibrio cholerae Determined by Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism. J. Clin. Microbiol.
40: 172-181
[Abstract] [Full Text]
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»