This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reischl, U.
Right arrow Articles by Lehn, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reischl, U.
Right arrow Articles by Lehn, N.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, June 2000, p. 2429-2433, Vol. 38, No. 6
0095-1137/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Rapid Identification of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Simultaneous Species Confirmation Using Real-Time Fluorescence PCR

Udo Reischl,* Hans-Jörg Linde, Michaela Metz, Birgit Leppmeier, and Norbert Lehn

Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, University of Regensburg, D-93053 Regensburg, Germany

Received 22 October 1999/Returned for modification 31 January 2000/Accepted 23 March 2000


    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

A duplex LightCycler PCR assay targeting the mecA gene and a Staphylococcus aureus-specific marker was used to test 165 S. aureus strains and 80 strains of other bacterial species. Within an assay time of 60 min plus 10 min for sample preparation, S. aureus as well as the presence or absence of the mecA gene was correctly identified.


    TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

Staphylococcus aureus represents one of the most significant pathogens causing nosocomial and community-acquired infections. Beta-lactam antibiotics are the preferred drugs for serious S. aureus infections (11). Since the introduction of methicillin into clinical use in 1961, the occurrence of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains has increased steadily, and nosocomial infections have become a serious problem worldwide (1, 11, 14, 19, 21). Therefore, the detection of methicillin resistance has important implications for therapy and management of patients. In the clinical laboratory, S. aureus is identified by growth characteristics and the subsequent detection of catalase and coagulase activities or specific surface constituents. The DNase and thermostable endonuclease tests have been used as confirmatory tests for inconclusive or negative coagulase tests. Conventional susceptibility testing of S. aureus reliably detects resistance to methicillin or oxacillin if agar dilution or agar screening methods are used according to NCCLS standards (9). Methicillin resistance is associated with the production of a penicillin-binding protein, encoded by the mecA gene (3, 5), or, in rare cases, with the hyperproduction of beta -lactamase.

Conventional identification methods are time-consuming and may yield false-positive or false-negative results, and misclassifications with automated susceptibility testing systems or commercially available latex agglutination kits have been reported recently (16, 17, 18, 23). The rapid and sensitive PCR-based detection of the mecA gene has evolved as the method of choice for the definitive identification of MRSA and other methicillin-resistant staphylococci (2, 4, 6, 7, 10, 13, 20, 22). Since S. aureus can resemble coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) on visual examination of agar plates and the coagulase status is not always easily established in a timely fashion, the inclusion of a species-specific marker is favorable (8).

Here we describe the development and evaluation of a duplex PCR assay for the simultaneous detection of the mecA gene and a recently described S. aureus-specific genomic fragment (12). In order to meet the requirements of true rapid diagnostics, the novel LightCycler device (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Mannheim, Germany) was used for ultrarapid thermal cycling and online monitoring of the amount of specific PCR product present in the amplification mixture.

All the strains used in this study were maintained on Columbia blood agar and identified by colony morphology, Gram stain characteristics, catalase reaction, coagulase production, and the results of the API Staph System (bioMerieux Vitek, Inc., Hazelwood, Mo.). Oxacillin susceptibility was determined by the agar screening method with Mueller-Hinton agar containing 2% NaCl and 6 mg of oxacillin per liter for S. aureus or 0.5 mg of oxacillin per liter for CoNS (9).

Template DNA was prepared by a simple and rapid boiling procedure (15). Briefly, portions of individual bacterial colonies were suspended in 200 µl of lysis buffer containing 1% Triton X-100, 0.5% Tween 20, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), and 1 mM EDTA and incubated in a screw-cap reaction tube for 10 min in a boiling water bath. After centrifugation for 2 min at 10,000 × g to sediment the debris, a 2-µl aliquot of the clear supernatant was directly transferred to the PCR apparatus. Alternatively, a High Pure PCR Template Preparation Kit (Roche) was used to obtain pure genomic DNA, which can be stored at -20°C for several months. The efficiencies of the commercial kit and the boiling procedure were found to be comparable for the extraction of amplifiable S. aureus DNA.

Oligonucleotide primers and fluorescence-labeled hybridization probes, designed for amplification and sequence-specific detection of a 408-bp fragment within the mecA gene and a 179-bp fragment within an S. aureus-specific genomic marker (12), were obtained from Tib Molbiol (Berlin, Germany). Nucleotide sequences and positions are listed in Table 1. Amplification mixtures contained 2 µl of 10× LightCycler FastStart DNA Master Hybridization Probes mixture (Roche), 5 mM MgCl2 (total concentration), 1 µM each Mec-F and Mec-R primer oligonucleotide, 0.25 µM each Sa442-F and Sa442-R primer oligonucleotide, 0.2 µM each hybridization probe oligonucleotide, and 2 µl of template DNA in a final volume of 20 µl. Following an initial denaturation at 95°C for 10 min to activate the FastStart Taq DNA polymerase, the 40-cycle amplification profile consisted of heating at 20°C/s to 95°C with a 10-s hold, cooling at 20°C/s to 50°C with a 10-s hold, and heating at 20°C/s to 72°C with a 20-s hold. Fluorescence values of each capillary were measured at 640 and 705 nm (dual-color option).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1.   Oligonucleotide primers and LightCycler hybridization probes used in the PCR assay

PCR experiments performed with MRSA strain ATCC 33592 (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, Va.), grown and serially diluted in phosphate-buffered saline as described previously (12), revealed a detection limit of approximately 25 CFU (25 genome equivalents) per assay for the mecA-specific primer pair Mec-F-Mec-R in combination with hybridization probes Mec-HP-1 and Mec-HP-2 (Fig. 1A). For amplification and detection of an S. aureus-specific genomic fragment (12), a detection limit of approximately 5 CFU of S. aureus per assay was determined with primer pair Sa442-F-Sa442-R and hybridization probes Sa442-HP-1 and Sa442-HP-2 (Fig. 1B). The duplex approach, containing four different primer oligonucleotides and four different hybridization probes within a single capillary, revealed identical detection limits (data not shown). Significant formation of primer dimers or secondary structures or other cross-reactions between oligonucleotide components, which frequently interfere with the analytical sensitivity of multiplex PCR approaches, are therefore unlikely in this particular assay.


View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.   Analytical sensitivity of the PCR assay for the mecA gene (A) and the S. aureus-specific genomic fragment Sa442 (B), determined with serial dilutions of a cultured MRSA strain. Detection limits in terms of numbers of CFU, determined by a standard plating procedure, are given next to the corresponding amplicon curves.

For specificity testing, type strains of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) (ATCC 35696, ATCC 27704, ATCC 23361, ATCC 15752, and ATCC 27695) and MRSA (ATCC 43300, ATCC 33591, ATCC 33592, ATCC 33593, and ATCC 33594) and 155 clinical isolates of S. aureus, including 55 MRSA isolates with different patterns in pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, were examined. Figure 2 shows the results for a representative panel of strains. Visual examination of the plots generated by the LightCycler software (cycle number versus fluorescence) allowed for a clear discrimination between positive and negative samples. All 165 strains were correctly amplified and detected with the S. aureus-specific set of primers and hybridization probes, and all 60 methicillin-resistant strains were identified with the mecA-specific set of primers and hybridization probes. Compared with the results of conventional identification and susceptibility testing, the PCR assay showed 100% specificity and sensitivity for species identification and detection of methicillin resistance for the 165 S. aureus strains investigated.


View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2.   Evaluation of the PCR assay with clinical samples. A representative set of clinical samples was simultaneously tested for the mecA gene (A) and the S. aureus-specific marker (B). Amplicon curves representing mecA-positive (pos.) isolates are indicated by brackets. The mecA-negative (neg.) samples of this panel were two MSSA strains. The S. aureus-negative sample in this panel was a methicillin-resistant strain of S. epidermidis.

Specificity was further confirmed by testing a panel of 40 gram-negative and 40 gram-positive bacterial species, including methicillin-resistant isolates of Staphylococcus epidermidis (n = 3), Staphylococcus hominis (n = 2), and Staphylococcus pasteuri (n = 1) as well as methicillin-susceptible isolates of S. hominis (n = 1), Staphylococcus warneri (n = 1), Staphylococcus capitis (n = 1), and Staphylococcus haemolyticus (n = 1). Among the CoNS, methicillin-resistant isolates were positive for the mecA gene but negative for the S. aureus-specific marker (e.g., the negative curve in Fig. 2B representing a methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis strain). All other bacterial isolates were found negative for both parameters of the duplex PCR assay. These findings were in accordance with the results of Martineau et al. (12), who reported 100% sensitivity and specificity for this particular S. aureus target sequence.

Taq DNA polymerase inhibition was investigated with 64 samples, which were randomly selected from DNA preparations obtained with both extraction methods. Each of the samples was spiked with 300 pg of human DNA. PCR was performed using the components of the LightCycler Control Kit (Roche), allowing for specific detection of the human beta -globin gene. Inhibition events were observed with none of the DNA preparations tested.

Showing a detection limit of at least 25 MRSA genome equivalents, this PCR assay should also be sensitive enough for direct detection and identification of MRSA in clinical specimens. However, direct detection of MRSA is restricted to clinical specimens from normally sterile sites where the presence of only a single bacterial species is expected. If a clinical specimen contains, for example, a mixture of MSSA and methicillin-resistant CoNS (even in trace amounts in cases of contamination), PCR performed directly on this particular specimen will be positive for both S. aureus and mecA. Due to this dilemma, our PCR assay was routinely applied to bacterial colonies on agar plates judged to be pure.

Since procedures for sequence-specific detection of amplicons have evolved as the "gold standard" in the field of diagnostic PCR, we concentrated on the LightCycler HybProbe concept to avoid the application of time-consuming and laborious postamplification procedures, such as Southern blotting, solid-phase hybridization, or DNA sequencing. Due to its compact and reliable nature, our duplex PCR assay proved to be a valuable tool for the rapid identification of MRSA isolates in the environment of a routine microbiological laboratory setting. In combination with the simple boiling protocol for template DNA preparation, it can be easily integrated into the work flow of any diagnostic laboratory. Once the growth of staphylococci is observed on agar plates, a portion of the colony can be transferred to PCR. After 10 min of physical manipulation necessary for DNA extraction and completion of the reaction mixture, results are available within 60 min.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Markus Heep and Stefan Lukas for active support and Vanessa Bennett and Jeffrey Emch for critically reading the manuscript. We gratefully acknowledge the excellent technical assistance of Michaela Hien and Xiaojun Wu during the study.


    FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie und Hygiene, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, D-93053 Regensburg, Germany. Phone: 49-941-59609-50. Fax: 49-941-944-6402. E-mail: Udo.Reischl{at}klinik.uni-regensburg.de.


    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Text
References

1. Barber, M. 1961. Methicillin-resistant staphylococci. J. Clin. Pathol. 14:385-393.
2. Bekkaoui, F., J. P. McNevin, C. H. Leung, G. J. Peterson, A. Patel, R. S. Bhatt, and R. N. Bryan. 1999. Rapid detection of the mecA gene in methicillin resistant staphylococci using a colorimetric cycling probe technology. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 34:83-90[CrossRef][Medline].
3. Chambers, H. F. 1987. Coagulase-negative staphylococci resistant to beta-lactam antibiotics in vivo produce penicillin-binding protein 2a. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 31:1919-1924[Abstract/Free Full Text].
4. Chambers, H. F. 1997. Methicillin resistance in staphylococci: molecular and biochemical basis and clinical implications. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 10:781-791[Abstract].
5. Hartman, B. J., and A. Tomasz. 1984. Low-affinity penicillin-binding protein associated with beta-lactam resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol. 158:513-516[Abstract/Free Full Text].
6. Hussain, Z., L. Stoakes, R. Lannigan, S. Longo, and B. Nancekivell. 1998. Evaluation of screening and commercial methods for detection of methicillin resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:273-274[Abstract/Free Full Text].
7. Hussain, Z., L. Stoakes, V. Massey, D. Diagre, V. Fitzgerald, S. El Sayed, and R. Lannigan. Correlation of oxacillin MIC with mecA gene carriage in coagulase-negative staphylococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:752-754.
8. Kearns, A. M., P. R. Seiders, J. Wheeler, R. Freeman, and M. Steward. 1999. Rapid detection of methicillin-resistant staphylococci by multiplex PCR. J. Hosp. Infect. 43:33-37[CrossRef][Medline].
9. Kohner, P., J. Uhl, C. Kolbert, D. Persing, and F. Cockerill. 1999. Comparison of susceptibility testing methods with mecA gene analysis for determining oxacillin (methicillin) resistance in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:2952-2961[Abstract/Free Full Text].
10. Kolbert, C. P., J. Arruda, P. Varga-Delmore, X. Zheng, M. Lewis, J. Kolberg, and D. H. Persing. 1998. Branched-DNA assay for detection of the mecA gene in oxacillin-resistant and oxacillin-sensitive staphylococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:2640-2644[Abstract/Free Full Text].
11. Lowy, F. D. 1998. Staphylococcus aureus infections. N. Engl. J. Med. 339:520-532[Free Full Text].
12. Martineau, F., F. J. Picard, P. H. Roy, M. Ouellette, and M. G. Bergeron. 1998. Species-specific and ubiquitous-DNA-based assays for rapid identification of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:618-623[Abstract/Free Full Text].
13. Murakami, K., W. Minamide, K. Wada, E. Nakamura, H. Teraoka, and S. Watanabe. 1991. Identification of methicillin-resistant strains of staphylococci by polymerase chain reaction. J. Clin. Microbiol. 29:2240-2244[Abstract/Free Full Text].
14. Panlilio, A. L., D. H. Culver, R. P. Gaynes, S. Banerjee, T. S. Henderson, J. S. Tolson, and W. J. Martone. 1992. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in U.S. hospitals, 1975-1991. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 13:582-586[Medline].
15. Reischl, U., M. Pulz, W. Ehret, and H. Wolf. 1994. PCR-based detection of mycobacteria in sputum samples using a simple and reliable DNA extraction protocol. BioTechniques 17:844-845[Medline].
16. Ribeiro, J., F. D. Vieira, T. King, J. B. D'Arezzo, and J. M. Boyce. 1999. Misclassification of susceptible strains of Staphylococcus aureus as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by a rapid automated susceptibility testing system. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:1619-1620[Abstract/Free Full Text].
17. Ruane, P. J., M. A. Morgan, D. M. Citron, and M. E. Mulligan. 1986. Failure of rapid agglutination methods to detect oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 24:490-492[Abstract/Free Full Text].
18. Schwarzkopf, A., H. Karch, H. Schmidt, W. Lenz, and J. Heesemann. 1993. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of epidemic clumping factor-negative, oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 31:2281-2285[Abstract/Free Full Text].
19. Towner, K. J., D. C. Talbot, R. Curran, C. A. Webster, and H. Humphreys. 1998. Development and evaluation of a PCR-based immunoassay for the rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Med. Microbiol. 47:607-613[Abstract/Free Full Text].
20. Vannuffel, P., P. F. Laterre, M. Bouyer, J. Gigi, B. Vandercam, M. Reynaert, and J. L. Gala. 1998. Rapid and specific molecular identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in endotracheal aspirates from mechanically ventilated patients. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:2366-2368[Abstract/Free Full Text].
21. Voss, A., D. Milatovic, C. Wallrauch-Schwarz, V. T. Rosdahl, and I. Braveny. 1994. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Europe. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 13:50-55[CrossRef][Medline].
22. Wallet, F., M. Roussel-Delvallez, and R. J. Courcol. 1996. Choice of a routine method for detecting methicillin-resistance in staphylococci. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 37:901-909[Abstract/Free Full Text].
23. Wilkerson, M., S. McAllister, J. M. Miller, B. J. Heiter, and P. P. Bourbeau. 1997. Comparison of five agglutination tests for identification of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:148-151[Abstract].


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, June 2000, p. 2429-2433, Vol. 38, No. 6
0095-1137/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Shore, A. C., Rossney, A. S., O'Connell, B., Herra, C. M., Sullivan, D. J., Humphreys, H., Coleman, D. C. (2008). Detection of Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome mec-Associated DNA Segments in Multiresistant Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) and Identification of Staphylococcus epidermidis ccrAB4 in both Methicillin-Resistant S. aureus and MSSA. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52: 4407-4419 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Lee, K.-H., Lee, J.-W., Wang, S.-W., Liu, L.-Y., Lee, M.-F., Chuang, S.-T., Shy, Y.-M., Chang, C.-L., Wu, M.-C., Chi, C.-H. (2008). Development of a novel biochip for rapid multiplex detection of seven mastitis-causing pathogens in bovine milk samples. jvdi 20: 463-471 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Buhlmann, M., Bogli-Stuber, K., Droz, S., Muhlemann, K. (2008). Rapid Screening for Carriage of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus by PCR and Associated Costs. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46: 2151-2154 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Rupp, J., Fenner, I., Solbach, W., Gieffers, J. (2006). Be Aware of the Possibility of False-Positive Results in Single-Locus PCR Assays for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus.. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 2317-2317 [Full Text]  
  • Desjardins, M., Guibord, C., Lalonde, B., Toye, B., Ramotar, K. (2006). Evaluation of the IDI-MRSA Assay for Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus from Nasal and Rectal Specimens Pooled in a Selective Broth. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 1219-1223 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Ishii, Y., Alba, J., Maehara, C., Murakami, H., Matsumoto, T., Tateda, K., Furuya, N., Iwata, M., Yamaguchi, K. (2006). Identification of biochemically atypical Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates with three automated identification systems.. J Med Microbiol 55: 387-392 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Espy, M. J., Uhl, J. R., Sloan, L. M., Buckwalter, S. P., Jones, M. F., Vetter, E. A., Yao, J. D. C., Wengenack, N. L., Rosenblatt, J. E., Cockerill, F. R. III, Smith, T. F. (2006). Real-Time PCR in Clinical Microbiology: Applications for Routine Laboratory Testing. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 19: 165-256 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Shrestha, N. K., Tuohy, M. J., Padmanabhan, R. A., Hall, G. S., Procop, G. W. (2005). Evaluation of the LightCycler Staphylococcus MGRADE Kits on Positive Blood Cultures That Contained Gram-Positive Cocci in Clusters. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 6144-6146 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Gillespie, B. E., Oliver, S. P. (2005). Simultaneous Detection of Mastitis Pathogens, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus uberis, and Streptococcus agalactiae by Multiplex Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction. J DAIRY SCI 88: 3510-3518 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Sinsimer, D., Leekha, S., Park, S., Marras, S. A. E., Koreen, L., Willey, B., Naidich, S., Musser, K. A., Kreiswirth, B. N. (2005). Use of a Multiplex Molecular Beacon Platform for Rapid Detection of Methicillin and Vancomycin Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 4585-4591 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Miller, M. B., Meyer, H., Rogers, E., Gilligan, P. H. (2005). Comparison of Conventional Susceptibility Testing, Penicillin-Binding Protein 2a Latex Agglutination Testing, and mecA Real-Time PCR for Detection of Oxacillin Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and Coagulase-Negative Staphylococcus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 3450-3452 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Adams, D. N. (2005). Shortcut Method for Extraction of Staphylococcus aureus DNA from Blood Cultures and Conventional Cultures for Use in Real-Time PCR Assays. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 2932-2933 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Warren, D. K., Liao, R. S., Merz, L. R., Eveland, M., Dunne, W. M. Jr. (2004). Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Directly from Nasal Swab Specimens by a Real-Time PCR Assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 5578-5581 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Sakai, H., Procop, G. W., Kobayashi, N., Togawa, D., Wilson, D. A., Borden, L., Krebs, V., Bauer, T. W. (2004). Simultaneous Detection of Staphylococcus aureus and Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci in Positive Blood Cultures by Real-Time PCR with Two Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer Probe Sets. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 5739-5744 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Reischl, U., Youssef, M. T., Wolf, H., Hyytia-Trees, E., Strockbine, N. A. (2004). Real-Time Fluorescence PCR Assays for Detection and Characterization of Heat-Labile I and Heat-Stable I Enterotoxin Genes from Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 4092-4100 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Huletsky, A., Giroux, R., Rossbach, V., Gagnon, M., Vaillancourt, M., Bernier, M., Gagnon, F., Truchon, K., Bastien, M., Picard, F. J., van Belkum, A., Ouellette, M., Roy, P. H., Bergeron, M. G. (2004). New Real-Time PCR Assay for Rapid Detection of Methicillin- Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Directly from Specimens Containing a Mixture of Staphylococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 1875-1884 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Shrestha, N. K., Tuohy, M. J., Hall, G. S., Reischl, U., Gordon, S. M., Procop, G. W. (2003). Detection and Differentiation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Isolates by Real-Time PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 5121-5126 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Fukushima, H., Tsunomori, Y., Seki, R. (2003). Duplex Real-Time SYBR Green PCR Assays for Detection of 17 Species of Food- or Waterborne Pathogens in Stools. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 5134-5146 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Klaassen, C. H. W., de Valk, H. A., Horrevorts, A. M. (2003). Clinical Staphylococcus aureus Isolate Negative for the Sa442 Fragment. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 4493-4493 [Full Text]  
  • Fang, H., Hedin, G. (2003). Rapid Screening and Identification of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus from Clinical Samples by Selective-Broth and Real-Time PCR Assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 2894-2899 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Lapierre, P., Huletsky, A., Fortin, V., Picard, F. J., Roy, P. H., Ouellette, M., Bergeron, M. G. (2003). Real-Time PCR Assay for Detection of Fluoroquinolone Resistance Associated with grlA Mutations in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 3246-3251 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Wilson, D. A., Yen-Lieberman, B., Reischl, U., Gordon, S. M., Procop, G. W. (2003). Detection of Legionella pneumophila by Real-Time PCR for the mip Gene. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 3327-3330 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Sutterlin, K., Englert, R., Schmidt-Wieland, T., Schmitt, J., Reischl, U., Lehn, N. (2003). Sporadic Cases of Staphylococcus aureus Organisms Negative for a Species-Specific 442-Base Pair Chromosomal Fragment. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 3449-3449 [Full Text]  
  • Martagon-Villamil, J., Shrestha, N., Sholtis, M., Isada, C. M., Hall, G. S., Bryne, T., Lodge, B. A., Reller, L. B., Procop, G. W. (2003). Identification of Histoplasmacapsulatum from Culture Extracts by Real-Time PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 1295-1298 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Hasegawa, T., Suzuki, K., Sakamoto, C., Ohta, K., Nishiki, S., Hino, M., Tatsumi, N., Kitagawa, S. (2003). Expression of the inhibitor of apoptosis (IAP) family members in human neutrophils: up-regulation of cIAP2 by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and overexpression of cIAP2 in chronic neutrophilic leukemia. Blood 101: 1164-1171 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Miller, N., Cleary, T., Kraus, G., Young, A. K., Spruill, G., Hnatyszyn, H. J. (2002). Rapid and Specific Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from Acid-Fast Bacillus Smear-Positive Respiratory Specimens and BacT/ALERT MP Culture Bottles by Using Fluorogenic Probes and Real-Time PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 4143-4147 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Grisold, A. J., Leitner, E., Muhlbauer, G., Marth, E., Kessler, H. H. (2002). Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Simultaneous Confirmation by Automated Nucleic Acid Extraction and Real-Time PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 2392-2397 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Shrestha, N. K., Tuohy, M. J., Hall, G. S., Isada, C. M., Procop, G. W. (2002). Rapid Identification of Staphylococcus aureus and the mecA Gene from BacT/ALERT Blood Culture Bottles by Using the LightCycler System. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 2659-2661 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Tan, T. Y., Corden, S., Barnes, R., Cookson, B. (2001). Rapid Identification of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus from Positive Blood Cultures by Real-Time Fluorescence PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39: 4529-4531 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kessler, H. H., Muhlbauer, G., Stelzl, E., Daghofer, E., Santner, B. I., Marth, E. (2001). Fully Automated Nucleic Acid Extraction: MagNA Pure LC. Clin. Chem. 47: 1124-1126 [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reischl, U.
Right arrow Articles by Lehn, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reischl, U.
Right arrow Articles by Lehn, N.