Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, July 2000, p. 2633-2637, Vol. 38, No. 7
Moredun Research Institute, International
Research Centre, Pentlands Science Park, Bush Loan, Penicuik,
Midlothian EH26-OPZ, Scotland
Received 27 January 2000/Returned for modification 22 March
2000/Accepted 26 April 2000
Caseous lymphadenitis is a chronic suppurative disease caused by
Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis and is responsible for serious economic losses to the sheep and goat industry. Caseous lymphadenitis was first reported for goats in the United Kingdom in
1990 and for sheep in 1991. Recent evidence suggests that the prevalence of the disease within the national flock is increasing. Fifty isolates of C. pseudotuberculosis from the United
Kingdom comprising sheep and horse isolates, the original goat outbreak strain, and the type strain were characterized by biotyping,
antimicrobial susceptibility, production of phospholipase D, and
genotyping by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis using SfiI
and SmaI. All of the isolates were confirmed as C. pseudotuberculosis, and all produced phospholipase D but none
reduced nitrate. Restriction with SfiI generated 16 to 18 bands between 48.5 and 290 kb and differentiated six pulsotypes. We
conclude that 80% of the strains tested were epidemiologically related
to the outbreak strain and that the equine profile was distinct both
phenotypically and genotypically.
Corynebacterium
pseudotuberculosis is the causative organism of caseous
lymphadenitis (CLA) and has been isolated from sheep, goats, cattle,
horses, and more rarely man (1, 5, 8, 22, 29, 34). CLA
is prevalent worldwide but incidence is higher in areas where
intensive husbandry is practiced (5, 16; M. Edelsten, Letter, Vet. Rec. 141:631, 1997). Sheep and goat
industries worldwide suffer significant economic loss due to the
culling of infected animals, carcase condemnation, and decreased wool
production (6, 23). As European border controls have
become less stringent and livestock are moved more freely between
nations, countries previously free from CLA have reported outbreaks.
The first outbreak in The Netherlands was in 1984 and was linked to
goats imported from France (27). This outbreak could
not be contained, and CLA subsequently became established in the dairy
goat industry (9). CLA was first reported in the United
Kingdom in 1990 (12, 15, 18) in goats that had been in
contact with Boer goats imported from Germany (19).
Despite stringent restriction orders on the movement of livestock
(K. C. Meldrum, Letter, Vet. Rec., 126:369, 1990) and
the tracing of in-contact animals (R. A. Laven, J. C. Fishwick, G. C. Pritchard, and P. G. G. Jackson,
Letter, Vet. Rec. 141:479, 1997), the first occurrence
of CLA in sheep was reported in 1991 (26). Since then, cases
have been identified in sheep flocks in England (17; B. E. Preece, Letter, Vet. Rec.
141:527, 1997; S. Rizvi, L. E. Green, and M. J. Glover, Letter, Vet. Rec. 140:586, 1997), and Scotland
(G. Baird, Letter, Vet. Rec. 140:611, 1997), and more
recently in Northern Ireland (G. Baird, unpublished observations).
United Kingdom national statistics indicate that twice as many new
outbreaks of CLA occurred in 1998 as in 1997 (Veterinary Laboratories
Agency, MAFF, p. 27, 1998). Reports of CLA outbreaks in United Kingdom
flocks reveal a pattern of lesion distribution around the head and neck
that had previously been reported as uncommon in sheep (Rizvi et al.,
Vet. Rec.). Extensive variability in the cultural and biochemical
characteristics of C. pseudotuberculosis has been reported
previously (21, 29, 30), and genotypic variation has
been investigated by restriction endonuclease analysis and restriction
fragment length polymorphism. Characterization studies using
restriction endonuclease analysis have been hampered by the
overabundance of banding patterns (31) and the poor
discrimination between isolates from different animal species and
geographical locations (16, 29, 30, 31). Pulsed-field gel
electrophoresis (PFGE) is a powerful epidemiological tool that
produces unique, discernible genomic fingerprints and has been
applied to other veterinary pathogens and gram-positive organisms, such
as Listeria ivanovii and Listeria monocytogenes
(24). Correia et al. (7) published the first
report on PFGE analysis of Corynebacterium (Corynebacterium glutamicum), and other authors have
explored PFGE analysis of Corynebacterium diphtheriae using
a variety of restriction enzymes (10, 25). The aims of this
study were to characterize United Kingdom isolates of C. pseudotuberculosis on the basis of their biochemical,
antimicrobial resistance, and PFGE patterns and to establish whether
there was genetic diversity or a clonal arrangement of C. pseudotuberculosis within them. This paper describes the first
characterization of isolates from the United Kingdom and, to the
authors' knowledge, the first report of C. pseudotuberculosis genotyping by PFGE.
Bacterial strains.
The isolates used in this study are
described in Table 1. Forty-six field
isolates of C. pseudotuberculosis were collected at random
from the Borders Region, Scotland, by the Scottish Agricultural College, Veterinary Services Division, St. Boswells, over a period of
12 months. Isolates were identified by standard microbiological techniques (3) and sent to Moredun Research Institute for
confirmation and typing. Three caprine isolates from the original
United Kingdom outbreak were kindly supplied by Jean Shreeve, Central
Veterinary Laboratory (CVL), Surrey, United Kingdom. They were isolated
from goats on three separate premises in Buckinghamshire, Oxfordshire, and Cornwall, England, within a 2-week period in April 1990. The following National Collection of Type Cultures (NCTC) strains were used
as comparators throughout the biochemical characterization: Corynebacterium jeikeium, Corynebacterium
kutscheri, Corynebacterium ulcerans, and C. pseudotuberculosis. Streptococcus agalactiae and
Staphylococcus aureus strains were used for the CAMP
inhibition test. Cultures were preserved by inoculating a Microbank
vial (Pro-lab Diagnostics, Neston, Cheshire, England) according to the
manufacturer's instructions and were stored at
0095-1137/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Characterization of United Kingdom Isolates of
Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis Using Pulsed-Field
Gel Electrophoresis
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
70°C. Isolates were
passaged no more than six times from initial isolation to testing by
PFGE.
TABLE 1.
NCTC bacterial strains and field isolates of C. pseudotuberculosis used in this study
Biotyping. The isolates were grown on blood agar base (Oxoid, Basingstoke, Hampshire, England) with the addition of 5% (vol/vol) citrated sheep blood and incubated at 37°C for 48 h. The isolates were characterized using API Coryne (bioMérieux, Basingstoke, England) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Nitrate reduction was confirmed using nitrate broth and further reduction beyond nitrite was tested by the addition of zinc dust (3).
Antimicrobial susceptibility. Isolates were tested for antimicrobial susceptibility using ATB-VET (bioMérieux), a kit intended for use with veterinary isolates. The antimicrobials used and the breakpoint concentrations were as follows: amoxicillin, 4 µg/ml; amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, 4 and 2 µg/ml, respectively; apramycin, 16 µg/ml; cefoperazone, 4 µg/ml; cephalothin, 8 µg/ml; chloramphenicol, 8 µg/ml; colistin, 4 µg/ml; doxycycline, 4 µg/ml; enrofloxacin, 0.5 µg/ml; erythromycin, 1 µg/ml; flumequine, 4 µg/ml; fusidic acid, 2 µg/ml; gentamicin, 4 µg/ml; kanamycin, 8 µg/ml; lincomycin, 2 µg/ml; metronidazole, 4 µg/ml; nitrofurantoin, 25 µg/ml; oxacillin, 2 µg/ml; oxolinic acid, 2 µg/ml; penicillin, 0.25 µg/ml; pristinamycin, 2 µg/ml; rifampin, 4 µg/ml; spectinomycin, 64 µg/ml; streptomycin, 8 µg/ml; sulfamethizole, 100 µg/ml; tetracycline, 4 µg/ml; trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole, 2 and 38 µg/ml, respectively; and tylosin, 2 µg/ml. The tests were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions with the exception of incubation time, which was extended from 24 to 48 h.
PLD production. Phospholipase D (PLD) was detected by the CAMP inhibition test as described by Barksdale et al. (2).
Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. C. pseudotuberculosis isolates were grown on blood agar for 48 h at 37°C. A bacterial suspension was prepared in an Eppendorf tube in 1.5 ml of phosphate-buffered saline to a concentration of McFarland No. 6 (1.8 × 109 CFU/ml) using a Densimat densitometer (bioMérieux). Chromosomal DNA was prepared as described by Khattak and Matthews (13) with the following exceptions: following proteinase K digestion, the plugs were shaken gently at room temperature for 30 min instead of 2 h in 5 ml of Tris-EDTA buffer and phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and plugs were washed six times in 5 ml of Tris-EDTA with gentle shaking at room temperature for 15 min. A 3-mm insert was cut from the plug and equilibrated in the appropriate enzyme buffer for 1 h at room temperature. Subsequently, 20 U of the restriction enzyme SfiI (Boehringer Mannheim, Lewes, Sussex, United Kingdom) was added and digestion was carried out overnight at 50°C. Fresh restriction enzyme was added the following morning and incubated for 3 h at 50°C. PFGE was performed using a Chef DRII system (Bio-Rad laboratories, Hemel Hempstead, United Kingdom), and gels consisted of 1% agarose (Sigma) in Tris-borate-EDTA buffer. A Lambda 340 DNA ladder (Boehringer) was used as a molecular weight marker. Electrophoresis was performed at 6 V/cm at 14°C for 20 h with an initial switch time of 5 s and final switch time of 20 s. The gels were stained using 100 µl of ethidium bromide (Promega Corporation, Madison, Wis.) in 700 ml of distilled water for 30 min at room temperature with gentle shaking and were destained in 700 ml of distilled water for 30 min. The gels were photographed using Image Master, Video Display System (Pharmacia, Amersham Biotech, Buckinghamshire, England) under UV transillumination. Results were analyzed using the Image Master 3D Elite database. Other restriction enzymes tested were ApaI and SpeI. To confirm the in vitro stability of PFGE pulsotypes, five randomly chosen isolates (numbers 4, 17, 33, 41, and 45) were also passaged 20 times before preserving on cryopreservation beads.
The interpretation of PFGE patterns was based on the criteria proposed by Tenover et al. (32), who defined genetic events and categories of genetic and epidemiological relatedness as follows. A genetic event is caused by either a point mutation or an insertion or deletion resulting in three- or two-band differences, respectively. The comparison of isolates with the outbreak strain yields four categories: indistinguishable, closely related, possibly related, and different. These categories are distinguishable by the presence of zero, two to three, four to six, and seven or more band differences, respectively. The resultant epidemiological interpretations are as follows: isolate is part of the outbreak, isolate is probably part of the outbreak, isolate is possibly part of the outbreak, and isolate is not part of the outbreak.| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Biotyping.
C. pseudotuberculosis colonies were white,
regular, and
-hemolytic, and there was a tendency for the entire
colony to move when scraped. Approximate colony diameters after a 48-h
incubation were 0.5 mm with the exception of isolates 4 and 49 (both
1.5 mm) 2 (0.2 mm), and 38 (0.3 mm). Growth on blood agar produced a
mouse-like odor. All isolates were catalase positive. Of the ovine
isolates, 43 out of 45 had an identical API profile (0101324) and
were confirmed as C. pseudotuberculosis (percent
identity, 99.6). Ovine isolate 19 was identified as C. jeikeium due to its inability to hydrolyze urea and was removed
from the study. The API yielded unexpected results in that caprine and
ovine isolates were expected to be nitrate negative and equine isolates
were expected to be nitrate positive (4). The equine
isolates were nitrate negative, and repeat testing using the nitrate
broth method yielded a negative result both times for all isolates. The
equine isolates differed from the ovine and caprine isolates by
producing alpha glucosidase and differed from each other in their
production of alkaline phosphatase.
Antimicrobial susceptibility.
Variation in susceptibility was
observed with five antibiotics (Table 2):
streptomycin, kanamycin, gentamicin, sulfamethazole, and furazolidone.
In addition, all isolates were susceptible to penicillin G,
amoxicillin, co-amoxiclav, oxacillin, cephalothin, cefoperazone,
spectinomycin, apramycin, chloramphenicol, tetracycline, doxycycline, erythromycin, lincomycin, pristinamycin, tylosin, co-trimoxazole, flumequine, enrofloxacin, fusidic acid, and
rifampin.
|
PLD production. All C. pseudotuberculosis isolates produced PLD.
PFGE.
Of the 50 isolates tested, six pulsotypes were
identified (Fig. 1; Table 2). Band size
ranged from 48.5 to 240 kb, and the average number of bands within this
range was 17. Three rare-cutting restriction enzymes were tested:
SfiI, ApaI, and SpeI. SfiI
proved to be the optimal choice under these running conditions. The
reproducibility of the PFGE method was confirmed by repeated testing of
a panel of five isolates. Inserts prepared from the same batch of
plugs, when run on eight different gels, yielded identical banding
patterns. The in vitro stability of the pulsotypes was confirmed in
that the banding patterns before and after 20 passages were identical. Pulsotypes were first identified by eye and were confirmed using the
Image Master Database 3D Elite. Figure 2
illustrates the computer-generated dendrogram of best-fit analysis
using the Dice coefficient. Pulsotype 1 was a unique profile produced
by both the equine isolates. Pulsotype P2 comprised 43 of 46 ovine
isolates. Pulsotypes P3, P5, and P6 were represented by single ovine
isolates. Two of the caprine isolates typed as P2 and one as P4.
Isolate 33 did not produce a clear fingerprint in Fig. 1, but in
previous gels was confirmed to be pulsotype P3 (our unpublished
observations). The PFGE profiles obtained clearly distinguished between
the horse isolates and the goat and sheep isolates.
|
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Previous characterization studies of C. pseudotuberculosis have been hampered by the wide variation in the biochemical characteristics of the organism (5, 6, 29). Some of these variations may be attributed to the different identification methods and techniques, but there may also be individual strain to strain variation.
This study showed that on the basis of biochemical and molecular characterization, the United Kingdom isolates of C. pseudotuberculosis are clonally arranged. Our results confirm the findings of others in that the ovine and caprine isolates belong to biovar ovis (4, 21) and support the findings in regard to the nitrate reduction variability of the equine isolates (4).
Of the restriction enzymes tested, SfiI proved superior in both the range of band sizes generated and the fragment resolution. The six pulsotypes were differentiated by the presence or absence of one or more bands at various positions. These differences can be caused by a point mutation or by an insertion or deletion, resulting in three or two fragment differences, respectively (32). Kodjo et al. (14) demonstrated that such variations in banding patterns of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Yersinia pestis could occur after in vitro passage or after passage through different hosts. However, after 20 consecutive passages, no such variation was evident in our C. pseudotuberculosis isolates. Since there are no universally agreed criteria for designating pulsotypes, we have used Tenover's guidelines as a working hypothesis (32). Tenover et al. designated isolates of the same pulsotype indistinguishable. We postulate that the modal pulsotype 2 is indistinguishable from the original outbreak strain and that the isolates differing by a single genetic event are clonally related. The equine profile, by contrast, differs by at least three genetic events and is deemed to be genetically different.
Two studies on CLA in sheep and goats are of particular relevance to this report. In Australia, Sutherland et al. (30) compared isolates from sheep and goats with severe visceral disease imported from North America with isolates from indigenous merino sheep with typical superficial lesions. The isolates were identical both biochemically and genetically. This was an unexpected result, as the animals were from different parts of the world and presented different clinical pictures. Studies in Europe and Japan demonstrated a high degree of similarity among ovine and caprine isolates of C. pseudotuberculosis (16).
Peel et al. (22) reviewed 12 previously published human cases and reported on 10 new ones and suggested that due to clinical or laboratory misdiagnosis, infection might be more common than published accounts indicate. There would appear to be a strong zoonotic implication, as all but two of the cases were thought to be linked to occupational exposure.
The results of the antimicrobial susceptibility testing are largely in agreement with others (16, 21, 28), in that isolates were susceptible to the majority of the antimicrobial agents tested and most were resistant to streptomycin.
Having shown the applicability of PFGE in the characterization of C. pseudotuberculosis, future studies will include a wider range of isolates in order to extend our knowledge of the epidemiology of CLA in the United Kingdom.
In summary, 49 of 50 United Kingdom isolates were confirmed as C. pseudotuberculosis on the basis of their biochemical characterization. Six pulsotypes were identified by PFGE, which clearly distinguished the equine isolates from the caprine and ovine isolates. The results suggest that there is a clonal arrangement of C. pseudotuberculosis in the United Kingdom, and given that the three caprine isolates were from the original outbreak, it is probable that the source of infection was the imported Boer goats.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by Scottish Executive Rural Affairs Department and the Meat and Livestock Commission.
We thank Jean Shreeve for researching the CVL data and supplying the outbreak isolates.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Moredun Research Institute, International Research Centre, Pentlands Science Park, Bush Loan, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26-OPZ, Scotland. Phone: 0131-445-5111. Fax: 0131-445-6111. E-mail: connk{at}mri.sari.ac.uk.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Aleman, M., S. J. Spier, D. Wilson, and M. Doherr. 1996. Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis infection in horses: 538 cases (1982-1993). J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 209:804-809[Medline]. |
| 2. |
Barksdale, L.,
R. Linder,
I. T. Sulea, and M. Pollice.
1981.
Phospholipase D activity of Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis (Corynebacterium ovis) and Corynebacterium ulcerans, a distinctive marker within the genus Corynebacterium.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
13:335-343 |
| 3. | Barrow, G. I., and R. K. A. Feltham. 1993. Cowan and Steel's manual for the identification of medical bacteria. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England. |
| 4. | Biberstein, E. L., H. D. Knight, and S. Jang. 1971. Two biotypes of Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis. Vet. Rec. 89:691-692[Medline]. |
| 5. | Brown, C. C., and H. J. Olander. 1987. Caseous lymphadenitis of goats and sheep: a review. Vet. Bull. 57:1-12. |
| 6. | Collett, M. G., G. F. Bath, and C. M. Cameron. 1994. Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis infections, p. 1387-1395. In J. Coetzer, G. R. Thomson, and R. C. Justin (ed.), Infectious diseases of livestock with special reference to Southern Africa. Oxford University Press, Cape Town, South Africa. |
| 7. |
Correia, A.,
J. F. Martin, and J. M. Castro.
1994.
Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis of the genome of amino acid producing corynebacteria: chromosome sizes and diversity of restriction patterns.
Microbiology
140:2841-2847 |
| 8. |
Davis, E. W.
1990.
Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis infections in animals, p. 1120-1126.
In
B. P. Smith (ed.), Large animal internal medicine diseases of horses, cattle, sheep and goats. The C. V. Mosby Company, Toronto, Canada.
|
| 9. |
Dercksen, D. P.,
E. A. ter Laak, and B. E. C. Shreuder.
1996.
Eradication programme for caseous lymphadenitis in goats in the Netherlands.
Vet. Rec.
138:237 |
| 10. | De Zoysa, A., A. Efstratiou, R. C. George, M. Jahkola, J. Vuopio-Varkila, S. Deshevoi, G. Tseneva, and Y. Rikushin. 1995. Molecular epidemiology of Corynebacterium diphtheria from Northwestern Russia and surrounding countries studied by using ribotyping and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:1080-1083[Abstract]. |
| 11. | Gilmour, N. J. L. 1990. Caseous lymphadenitis: a cause for concern. Vet. Rec. 126:566[Medline]. |
| 12. | Harker, D. B. 1990. Investigation of an outbreak of caseous lymphadenitis in goats in the United Kingdom. Goat Vet. Soc. J. 11:52-54. |
| 13. |
Khattak, M. N., and R. C. Matthews.
1993.
Genetic relatedness of Bordetella species as determined by macrorestriction digests resolved by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.
Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.
43:659-664 |
| 14. |
Kodjo, A.,
L. Villard,
C. Bizet,
J.-L. Martel,
R. Sanchis,
E. Borges,
D. Gauthier,
F. Maurin, and Y. Richard.
1999.
Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis is more efficient than ribotyping and random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis in discrimination of Pasteurella haemolytica strains.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
37:380-385 |
| 15. | Lindsay, H. J., and S. Lloyd. 1991. Diagnosis of caseous lymphadenitis in goats. Vet. Rec. 128:86[Medline]. |
| 16. | Literak, I., A. Horvathova, M. Jahnova, I. Rychlik, and B. Skalka. 1999. Phenotype and genotype characteristics of the Slovak and Czech Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis strains isolated from sheep and goats. Small Ruminant Res. 32:107-111[CrossRef]. |
| 17. |
Lloyd, S.
1994.
Caseous lymphadenitis in sheep and goats.
In Pract.
16:24-29 |
| 18. | Lloyd, S., H. J. Lindsay, J. D. Slater, and P. G. G. Jackson. 1990. Caseous lymphadenitis in goats in England. Vet. Rec. 127:478[Medline]. |
| 19. | Lloyd, S., H. J. Lindsay, J. D. Slater, and P. G. G. Jackson. 1999. Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis infection (caseous lymphadenitis) in goats. Goat Vet. Soc. J. 11:55-65. |
| 20. | Miers, K. C., and W. B. Ley. 1980. Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis infection in the horse: study of 117 clinical cases and consideration of etiopathogenesis. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 177:250-253[Medline]. |
| 21. | Muckle, C. A., and C. L. Gyles. 1982. Characterization of strains of Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis. Can. J. Comp. Med. 46:206-208[Medline]. |
| 22. | Peel, M. M., G. G. Palmer, A. M. Stacpoole, and T. G. Kerr. 1997. Human lymphadenitis due to Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis: report of ten cases from Australia and review. Clin. Infect. Dis. 24:185-191[Medline]. |
| 23. | Pepin, M., M. Paton, and L. M. Hodgson. 1994. Pathogenesis and epidemiology of Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis infection in sheep. Curr. Top. Vet. Res. 1:63-82. |
| 24. | Ramage, C. P., J. C. Low, J. McLauchlin, and W. Donachie. 1999. Characterisation of Listeria ivanovii isolates from the UK using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 170:349-353[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 25. | Riegel, P., F. I. S. Freitas, G. Prevost, C. Andronescu, F. Bimet, M. Kiredjian, E. Estrangin, J. P. Emond, S. Dellion, B. Halioua, H. Monteil, and O. Patey. 1997. Comparison of traditional and molecular methods for typing nontoxigenic strains of Corynebacterium diphtheria. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 16:610-614[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 26. | Robins, R. 1991. Focus on caseous lymphadenitis. State Vet. J. 1:7-10. |
| 27. |
Shreuder, B. E. C.,
E. A. ter Laak, and H. W. Griesen.
1986.
An outbreak of caseous lymphadenitis in dairy goats 1st report of the disease in the Netherlands.
Vet. Q.
8:61-67[Medline].
|
| 28. | Skalka, B., I. Literak, I. Michalik, and M. Skrivanek. 1998. Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis infection in goats in the Czech Republic. J. Vet. Med. Ser. B 45:31-35. |
| 29. | Songer, J. G., K. Bechenbach, M. M. Marshall, G. B. Olsen, and L. Kelley. 1988. Biochemical and genetic characterization of Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis. Am. J. Vet. Res. 49:223-226[Medline]. |
| 30. | Sutherland, S. S., R. A. Hart, and N. B. Buller. 1993. Ribotype analysis of Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis isolates from sheep and goats. Aust. Vet. J. 70:454-456[Medline]. |
| 31. | Sutherland, S. S., R. A. Hart, and N. B. Buller. 1996. Genetic differences between nitrate-negative and nitrate-positive C. pseudotuberculosis strains using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Vet. Microbiol. 49:1-9[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 32. | Tenover, F. C., R. D. Arbeit, R. V. Goering, P. A. Mickelsen, B. A. Murray, D. H. Persing, and B. Swaminathan. 1995. Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:2233-2239[Medline]. |
| 33. | Welsh, R. D. 1990. Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis in the horse. Equine Pract. 12:7-16. |
| 34. |
Yeruham, I.,
D. Elad,
M. Van-Ham,
N. Y. Shpigel, and S. Perl.
1997.
Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis infection in Israeli cattle: clinical and epidemiological studies.
Vet. Rec.
140:423-427 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»