Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, August 2000, p. 3085-3086, Vol. 38, No. 8
0095-1137/00/$04.00+0
Validation of the Abbreviated Brucella
AMOS PCR as a Rapid Screening Method for Differentiation of
Brucella abortus Field Strain Isolates and the Vaccine
Strains, 19 and RB51
Darla R.
Ewalt1,* and
Betsy J.
Bricker2
National Veterinary Services Laboratories,
Veterinary Services, Animal and Plant Health and Inspection
Service,1 and National Animal Disease
Center, Agriculture Research Service,2 U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Ames, Iowa
Received 13 December 1999/Returned for modification 14 March
2000/Accepted 17 May 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
The Brucella AMOS PCR assay was previously developed to
identify and differentiate specific Brucella species. In
this study, an abbreviated Brucella AMOS PCR test was
evaluated to determine its accuracy in differentiating Brucella
abortus into three categories: field strains, vaccine strain 19 (S19), and vaccine strain RB51/parent strain 2308 (S2308). Two hundred
thirty-one isolates were identified and tested by the conventional
biochemical tests and Brucella AMOS PCR. This included 120 isolates identified as B. abortus S19, 9 identified as
B. abortus strain RB51, 57 identified as B. abortus biovar 1, 15 identified as B. abortus bv. 2, 1 identified as B. abortus bv. 2 (M antigen dominant), 7 identified as B. abortus bv. 4, and 22 identified as
B. abortus S2308 and isolated from experimentally infected
cattle. The Brucella AMOS PCR correctly identified each
isolate as RB51/S2308, S19, or a field strain of Brucella.
 |
TEXT |
The Brucella AMOS PCR
assay (2, 3) was developed at the National Animal Disease
Center to identify and differentiate Brucella abortus,
B. melitensis, B. ovis, and B. suis
bacteria (AMOS is an acronym for the Brucella species
identified). An abbreviated multiplex AMOS PCR assay was developed to
differentiate B. abortus into three categories: field
strains, vaccine strain 19 (S19), and vaccine strain RB51 and the RB51
parental strain, U.S. Department of Agriculture challenge strain 2308 (S2308) (3).
The abbreviated AMOS assay is based on the insertion of the genetic
element IS711 at a unique chromosomal locus in B. abortus bv. 1, 2, and 4 and the double insertion of
IS711 at a specific locus in B. abortus RB51
(2, 3). One PCR primer is anchored within the
IS711 sequence, while the differentiating primers are localized in the unique chromosomal DNAs adjacent to the insertion. The
primers were selected to amplify up to three products of different sizes. The primers amplify a 498-bp product present in B. abortus bv. 1, 2, and 4 plus two vaccine strains, and they also
amplify a 364-bp product from B. abortus RB51.
Identification of S19 is based on a PCR primer pair which amplifies a
short sequence (178 bp) (3) of the eri gene
(essential for erythritol catabolism), present in all
Brucella strains except B. abortus S19
(4). Thus, the identification of S19 is based on the absence
of amplification of this target.
The classical method of identifying the species and biovars of
Brucella strains requires a minimum of 5 days. A PCR
procedure can differentiate the vaccine strains from the field strains
in 24 h and will provide useful, early information to regulatory officials. The purpose of this paper is to report the results of using
the abbreviated Brucella AMOS PCR as a rapid screening test
for B. abortus field strains and vaccine strains.
Isolates from tissue and milk samples submitted to the
National Veterinary Services Laboratories and cultures submitted
from state, federal, and university laboratories were identified to Brucella species and biovar level by the conventional
methods (1). The following tests were performed on the
isolates: growth in the presence of basic fuchsin (1:25,000 and
1:100,000), thionin (1:25,000 and 1:100,000), thionin blue (1:500,000),
penicillin (5 U/ml), and erythritol (1 mg/ml and 2 mg/ml plus 5%
bovine serum); urease and catalase activity; lysis by the Tbilisi
phage; H2S production; and CO2 dependence. The
dominant antigen was determined by the microagglutination test. Rough
isolates were tested for susceptibility to rifampin in order to
identify RB51 isolates (5).
The isolates were also tested by the abbreviated Brucella
AMOS PCR. With a sterile inoculating loop, a small quantity of inoculum was suspended in 0.5 ml of 0.85% sterile saline. The cell
suspension (2.5 µl) was added to 22.5 µl of the master mix
consisting of 60 mM Tris-HCl (pH 9.0), 15 mM
(NH4)2SO4, 1.5 mM
MgCl2, 250 µM concentrations of each of the four
deoxynucleoside triphosphates, 1 U of Taq polymerase, and
five-primer cocktail (0.2 µM each), as previously described
(3). The mixture was cycled 35 times through a regimen of
1.2 min at 95°C, 2.0 min at 55.5°C, and 2.0 min at 72°C under the
conditions previously described (2). The amplified products
were separated by electrophoresis in a 2.5% Metaphor agarose gel (FMC)
in the presence of 0.5× Tris-borate-EDTA and were visualized by
staining with ethidium bromide under UV light. The results were
recorded by photographic methods.
Figure 1 shows that the results for the
B. abortus field strain, B. abortus vaccine
strains, and representatives of the classical Brucella
species were as expected. As designed, the typical B. abortus PCR amplifies two fragments, 498 and 178 bp. PCR using vaccine strain RB51 amplifies these two fragments plus the 364-bp fragment, while PCR with vaccine strain S19 produces only the B. abortus-specific 498-bp fragment. PCR with all other
Brucella species except B. ovis amplifies only
the 178-bp fragment from the eri gene. PCR with B. ovis, which has not been reported to infect cattle, also amplifies
the 364-bp fragment associated with tandem copies of IS711,
but this species is readily distinguished by the absence of the
B. abortus-specific 498-bp fragment.

View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Amplification of DNA fragments from different
Brucella strains. DNA was amplified by the abbreviated AMOS
PCR assay described in the text. Eight microliters of amplicons was
separated by electrophoresis, treated with ethidium bromide, and
visualized under UV light. Strain 544 is biovar 1; B. abortus S19 in lane 4 is from a lab passage; B. abortus
S19 in lanes 5 to 7 was reisolated from vaccinated cattle. For other
species, the strains used were as follows: B. canis strain
RM 6/66, B. melitensis bv. 1 strain 16M, B. neotomae strain 5K33, B. ovis strain 63/290, and
B. suis bv. 1 strain 1330.
|
|
Two hundred thirty-one isolates from cattle and bison located in
various states including Alabama, California, Florida, Kansas, Massachusetts, Texas, Vermont, Wisconsin, and Wyoming were identified and tested by the conventional biochemical tests and abbreviated Brucella AMOS PCR. This included 120 isolates identified as
B. abortus S19, 9 identified as B. abortus strain
RB51, 57 identified as B. abortus bv. 1, 15 identified as
B. abortus bv. 2, 1 identified as B. abortus bv.
2 (M antigen dominant), 7 identified as B. abortus bv. 4, and 22 identified as B. abortus S2308. The 22 B. abortus S2308 samples had all been reisolated from experimentally
challenged cattle. The abbreviated Brucella AMOS PCR was in
100% agreement with the conventional biochemical identification
procedures in identifying the Brucella isolates tested
(Table 1).
The abbreviated Brucella AMOS PCR correctly identified each
isolate as either RB51 or S2308, S19, or the field strain of
Brucella. This PCR procedure has high potential as a rapid
screening test for differentiating the two Brucella vaccines
from the virulent field strains of Brucella. B. abortus strains RB51 and S2308 are not differentiated from each
other by the abbreviated Brucella AMOS PCR. B. abortus strain S2308 is the U.S. Department of Agriculture challenge strain and is distinct from the virulent field strains in
both its PCR pattern and biochemical characteristics. It also differs
from RB51 because it forms smooth, colonies, while RB51 forms rough
ones. B. abortus strain RB51 is resistant to rifampin while
growth of the rest of the B. abortus strains is inhibited by rifampin.
In this study, PCR was shown to be a valuable tool for differentiating
the vaccine strains from the field strains of Brucella. The
conventional methods of identification require a minimum of 5 days to
identify an isolate to Brucella species and biovar level. This can delay the movement of cattle between different owners and have
a negative impact on the owners' financial planning. This study
indicates that Brucellosis eradication program personnel could reliably
use the abbreviated Brucella AMOS PCR to supplement other
diagnostic and epidemiological data (such as herd history and
serological test results) to release sale animals from quarantine before the conventional identification methods are completed.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: USDA, APHIS, VS,
NVSL, 1800 Dayton Rd., P.O. Box 844, Ames, IA 50010. Phone: (515) 663-7347. Fax: (515) 663-7673. E-mail:
Darla.R.Ewalt{at}usda.gov.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Alton, G. G.,
L. M. Jones,
R. D. Angus, and J. M. Verger.
1988.
Bacteriological methods, p. 13-61.
In
Techniques for the brucellosis laboratory. Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Paris, France.
|
| 2.
|
Bricker, B. J., and S. M. Halling.
1994.
Differentiation of Brucella abortus bv. 1, 2, and 4, Brucella melitensis, Brucella ovis, and Brucella suis bv. 1 by PCR.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
32:2660-2666[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Bricker, B. J., and S. M. Halling.
1995.
Enhancement of the Brucella AMOS PCR assay for differentiation of Brucella abortus vaccine strains S19 and RB51.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
33:1640-1642[Abstract].
|
| 4.
|
Sangari, F. J.,
J. M. Garcia-Lobo, and J. Agûero.
1994.
The Brucella abortus vaccine strain B19 carries a deletion in the erythritol catabolic genes.
FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
121:337-342[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Schurig, G. G.,
R. M. Roop II,
T. Bagchi,
S. Boyle,
D. Buhrman, and N. Sriranganathan.
1991.
Biological properties of RB51; a stable rough strain of Brucella abortus.
Vet. Microbiol.
28:171-188[CrossRef][Medline].
|
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, August 2000, p. 3085-3086, Vol. 38, No. 8
0095-1137/00/$04.00+0
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Mukherjee, F., Jain, J., Patel, V., Nair, M.
(2007). Multiple genus-specific markers in PCR assays improve the specificity and sensitivity of diagnosis of brucellosis in field animals. J Med Microbiol
56: 1309-1316
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Borriello, G., Capparelli, R., Bianco, M., Fenizia, D., Alfano, F., Capuano, F., Ercolini, D., Parisi, A., Roperto, S., Iannelli, D.
(2006). Genetic Resistance to Brucella abortus in the Water Buffalo (Bubalus bubalis). Infect. Immun.
74: 2115-2120
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Newby, D. T., Hadfield, T. L., Roberto, F. F.
(2003). Real-Time PCR Detection of Brucella abortus: a Comparative Study of SYBR Green I, 5'-Exonuclease, and Hybridization Probe Assays. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
69: 4753-4759
[Abstract]
[Full Text]