This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Espy, M. J. Articles by Smith, T. F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Espy, M. J. Articles by Smith, T. F.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, September 2000, p. 3187-3189, Vol. 38, No. 9
0095-1137/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Diagnosis of Varicella-Zoster Virus Infections in the Clinical Laboratory by LightCycler PCR

Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota 55905

Received 17 March 2000/Returned for modification 18 May 2000/Accepted 15 June 2000

	ABSTRACT

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

Varicella-zoster virus (VZV) causes vesicular dermal lesions which are clinically evident as varicella (primary infection) or zoster (reactivated) diseases. The LightCycler system (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) is a newly developed commercially available system designed to rapidly perform PCR with real-time detection of PCR products using a fluorescence resonance energy transfer. We compared the detection of VZV from dermal specimens by shell vial cell culture (MRC-5) and by LightCycler PCR. Of 253 specimens, VZV was detected in 23 (9.1%) by shell vial cell cultures and 44 (17.4%) by LightCycler PCR directed to a nucleic acid target sequence in gene 28. Twenty-one of 44 (47.7%) specimens were exclusively positive by LightCycler PCR; the shell vial cell culture assay was never positive when DNA amplification was negative (specificity, 100%). VZV DNA was detected in 39 of 44 (88.6%) specimens positive during cycles 10 through 30 of the LightCycler PCR. These VZV DNA-positive specimens (cycles 10 to 30) and 5 of 11 other PCR positive specimens (cycles 31 to 36) were confirmed by another LightCycler PCR directed to another (gene 29) target of the viral genome. For routine laboratory practice, all specimens yielding amplified DNA to the VZV gene 28 target can be considered positive results. The increased sensitivity (91%) of the LightCycler PCR for detection of VZV, rapid turnaround time for reporting results, virtual elimination of amplicon carryover contamination, and equivalent costs compared to shell vial cell culture for detection of VZV indicate the need for implementation of this technology for routine laboratory diagnosis of this viral infection.

	INTRODUCTION

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

The most common dermal manifestation resulting from primary infection with varicella-zoster virus (VZV) is chickenpox, generally occurring in early childhood. Reactivation of latent virus occurs in about 10 to 20% of adults and produces vesicles that are typically confined to a single dermatome of the skin (16). VZV infections can cause systemic infections of the central nervous and respiratory systems in immunologically healthy patients and produce disseminated disease of multiple organ systems in those with impaired immunologic defenses (6). Laboratory diagnosis is important for distinguishing herpes simplex virus (HSV) from VZV infections, since the clinical presentation of zoster can be confused with the dermal distribution produced by HSV (10).

Standard laboratory diagnosis has been obtained by culture of the virus in diploid fibroblasts seeded into shell vial cell cultures or directly by immunostaining of viral antigens in infected cells collected by swabs of vesicles from patients (2, 3, 8, 13). In the past, several studies have demonstrated the superiority of detection of VZV antigens by immunologic techniques or, more recently, by molecular amplification of viral DNA by PCR assays compared with serologic assays for immunoglobulin G or A class antibodies or the cultivation of this virus in cell cultures (1, 4, 9, 15). Sauerbrei et al. reported that the laboratory diagnoses of VZV infections of 100 patients by culture (20%), antigen detection by immunofluorescence (82%), and serology (48%) were inferior relative to those by PCR (95%) (11).

We recently reported enhanced sensitivity and rapid detection of HSV DNA by LightCycler PCR using genital and dermal specimens of patients compared with shell vial cell culture techniques. In our laboratory, we process each dermal specimen, in contrast to genital specimens, for the detection of both HSV and VZV infections. Our goal in the present study was to optimize the primers, probes, and conditions for the detection of VZV by LightCycler PCR and compare the results of this assay with those of shell vial cell culture isolation of the virus from dermal specimens. We found a 91% increase in detection of VZV by a LightCycler PCR from dermal specimens, which indicates the need for implementation of this assay for replacement of cell culture assays for diagnosis of this viral infection.

	MATERIALS AND METHODS

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

Specimens and cell cultures. Dermal swabs (n = 253) from patients suspected of having VZV infections were extracted and inoculated into MRC-5 shell vial cell cultures as previously described for HSV (7).

Nucleic acid extraction. Nucleic acids were extracted (IsoQuick; Orca Research, Inc., Bothell, Wash.) and amplified by LightCycler PCR (5).

LightCycler PCR. The LightCycler instrument (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) amplifies (in 30 to 40 min) target nucleic acid and monitors the development of PCR product by fluorescence assay after each cycle (denaturation, annealing, and extension). PCR primers for detection of target DNA in gene 28 were as follows: sense, 5'-GAC AAT ATC ATA TAC ATG GAA TGT G-3'; antisense, 5'-GCG GTA GTA ACA GAG AAT TTC TT-3'. Probes used were 5'-CGA AAA TCC AGA ATC GGA ACT TCT T-fluorescein-3' and 5'-Red 640-CCA TTA CAG TAA ACT TTA GGC GGT C phosphate-3' directed to a target of the 282-bp product (11). The master mix was optimized for the VZV, gene 28 LightCycler assay by eliminating dimethyl sulfoxide and by using 4 mM MgCl and 1 µM primers.

All samples were amplified by LightCycler PCR with primers directed to two genes of the virus: gene 28 and gene 29. Primers and probe for detection of VZV DNA gene 29 (single-stranded DNA binding protein and gene 28) were designed using the Oligo software (Molecular Biology Insights, Inc., Cascade, Colo.): sense, 5'-TGT CCT AGA GGA GGT TTT ATC TG-3'; antisense, 5'-CAT CGT CTG TAA AGAC TTA ACC AG-3'. Probes directed to target VZV DNA were of the 202-bp product. Both sets of hybridization probes contain a donor fluorophore (fluorescein) on the 3' end and 5'-GGG AAA TCG AGA AAC CAC CCT ATC GGA C-3', which, when excited by an external light source, emits light that was absorbed by a second hybridization probe, 5'-Red 640-AA GTT CGC GGT ATA ATT GTC AGT GGC G-phosphate-3' with an acceptor fluorophore, Red 640, at the 5' end. Both assays detected 20 genomic copies of VZV.

Specimen volumes, master mix composition, and amplification protocol for VZV DNA were as previously described for HSV DNA except for the use of 4 mM MgCl, 1 µM primers (gene 29), and 3% dimethyl sulfoxide (5).

	RESULTS

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

Of 253 dermal specimens, VZV was detected in 23 (9.1%) by shell vial cell cultures and 44 (17.4%) (gene 28) and 50 (19.7%) (gene 29) by LightCycler PCR tests (Table 1). Twenty-one of 44 (47.7%) (gene 28) and 27 of 50 (54.0%) (gene 29) specimens were exclusively positive by LightCycler PCR; the shell vial cell culture assay was never positive when DNA amplification was negative (specificity, 100%). VZV DNA was detected in 39 of the 44 (88.6%) (gene 28) and 39 of 50 (78.0%) (gene 29) total specimens positive during cycles 10 through 30 by the LightCycler assay. In addition, of the 23 total specimens positive by the shell vial assay, VZV DNA was detected by both LightCycler assays in these samples by cycle 26, indicating a direct relationship between the capability of culturing the virus by the shell vial assay and the recognition of amplified product in the early cycles of LightCycler PCR.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   TABLE 1.   Detection of VZV DNA by LightCycler PCR and by shell vial cell culture

Of the total 50 specimens detected by LightCycler PCR (gene 29), 11 samples were detected between cycles 30 and 36; 6 fewer samples (n = 44) were detected by LightCycler PCR (gene 28). VZV DNA was never exclusively detected by gene 28 in the absence of a positive LightCycler result using the gene 29 assay. Specificity of the LightCycler assay was further demonstrated by melting point analysis, which was performed with all samples from which a fluorescent signal was generated. All positive samples had a melting curve consistent with the positive VZV control.

	DISCUSSION

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

HSV (dermal and/or genital) and VZV (dermal) are the only two viruses routinely recovered from these sources in the clinical laboratory (14). Together (HSV, 71%; VZV, 6%), these two herpesviruses represent 77% of the almost 20,000 viruses detected in cell cultures in our laboratory over a 5-year period of time (1994 to 1998).

We previously reported a 22% increase in the sensitivity of LightCycler PCR compared to cell culture for detection of HSV DNA from clinical samples (5). We currently have demonstrated a 1.9-fold increase (91%) in the detection of VZV DNA by LightCycler PCR (n = 44 [gene 28]) in dermal specimens compared to shell vial cell culture (n = 23). These results were not unexpected, since numerous reports over the last 20 years have documented the difficulty of recovering VZV in tube and shell vial cell cultures relative to other diagnostic methods, particularly antigen detection by immunofluorescence and conventional PCR methods (1, 3, 12).

Further, we have demonstrated the specificity of the LightCycler VZV assay in that VZV-specific primers and probes amplified only VZV DNA. DNA from HSV, cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, and human herpesviruses 6, 7, and 8 tested with VZV-specific primers and probes were uniformly negative. In addition, of a total of 500 dermal, genital, and ocular samples tested by LightCycler PCR, 197 and 44 were confirmed as HSV DNA positive samples and VZV DNA-confirmed samples by another LightCycler PCR. There was no cross-reaction in fluorescence signal between the VZV- and HSV-positive sample.

Results of LightCycler PCR compared to shell vial cell culture were remarkably similar for the laboratory diagnosis of VZV in the present study and for HSV in a previous report (5). In both of these studies, target nucleic acids for HSV (158 of 225 [70.2%]) and VZV (39 of 44 [genes 28 and 29] [88.6%]) were detected by two independent LightCycler PCRs during the first 30 cycles of amplification. In the present report, primers directed to VZV (gene 29) detected 50 specimens with specific viral DNA, whereas 44 specimens were positive for the gene 28 target. Therefore, in routine laboratory practice, we recommend the implementation of primers directed to gene 28 based on a recent publication in which a chemiluminescence assay was used to detect VZV DNA PCR products (11). Even though gene 29 target was more sensitive than that of gene 28 in our study and 44 samples yielding VZV product were positive by PCR directed against both targets, we feel that this conservative approach (positive by both gene targets) should be used as a criterion for reporting results for clinical implementation of the assay.

Negative controls did not generate a product regardless of the number of PCR cycles. Overall, the closed system of LightCycler PCR, which practically eliminates carryover amplification contamination, together with the real-time monitoring of PCR products (especially those detected during the first 30 cycles), and melting curve analysis provides additional confidence of true-positive results compared with conventional gel and Southern blot analysis of PCR amplicons, which do not have these features. In addition, the LightCycler PCR should allow consistent and standardized analysis of clinical samples for the detection of VZV DNA compared to "home brew" assays that have multiple variables incorporated into the assay. Such standardization should become even more achievable with the potential use of an automated nucleic acid extraction instrument (MagNa Pure LC; Roche Molecular Biochemicals) prior to LightCycler PCR amplification. Lastly, the equivalent cost analysis for LightCycler PCR and vastly increased sensitivity compared with shell vial cell culture methods indicate the need for routine implementation of this new diagnostic technique.

	FOOTNOTES

^* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Division of Clinical Microbiology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, MN 55905. Phone: (507) 284-8146. Fax: (507) 284-4272. E-mail: tfsmith{at}mayo.edu.

	REFERENCES

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

1.	Beards, G., C. Graham, and D. Pillay. 1998. Investigation of vesicular rashes for HSV and VZV by PCR. J. Med. Virol. 54:155-157[CrossRef][Medline].
2.	Brinker, J. P., and G. V. Doern. 1993. Comparison of MRC-5 and A-549 cells in conventional culture tubes and shell vial assays for the detection of varicella-zoster virus. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 17:75-77[CrossRef][Medline].
3.	Coffin, S. E., and R. L. Hodinka. 1995. Utility of direct immunofluorescence and virus culture for detection of varicella-zoster virus in skin lesions. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:2792-2795[Abstract].
4.	Dahl, H., J. Marcoccia, and A. Linde. 1997. Antigen detection: the method of choice in comparison with virus isolation and serology for laboratory diagnosis of herpes zoster in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:347-349[Abstract].
5.	Espy, M. J., J. R. Uhl, P. S. Mitchell, J. N. Thorvilson, K. A. Svien, A. D. Wold, and T. F. Smith. 2000. Diagnosis of herpes simplex virus infections in the clinical laboratory by LightCycler PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:795-799[Abstract/Free Full Text].
6.	Gilden, D. H., B. K. Kleinschmidt-DeMasters, J. J. LaGuardia, R. Mahalingam, and R. J. Cohrs. 2000. Neurologic complications of the reactivation of varicella-zoster virus. N. Eng. J. Med. 342:635-645[Free Full Text].
7.	Gleaves, C. A., D. J. Wilson, A. D. Wold, and T. F. Smith. 1985. Detection and serotyping of herpes simplex virus in MRC-5 cells by use of centrifugation and monoclonal antibodies 16 h postinoculation. J. Clin. Microbiol. 21:29-32[Abstract/Free Full Text].
8.	McCarter, Y. S., and I. N. Ratkiewicz. 1998. Comparison of virus culture and direct immunofluorescent staining of cytocentrifuged virus transport medium for detection of varicella-zoster virus in skin lesions. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 109:631-633[Medline].
9.	Perez, J. L., A. Garcia, J. Niubo, J. Salva, D. Podzamczer, and R. Martin. 1994. Comparison of techniques and evaluation of three commercial monoclonal antibodies for laboratory diagnosis of varicella-zoster virus in mucocutaneous specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 32:1610-1613[Abstract/Free Full Text].
10.	Rubben, A., J. M. Baron, and E. I. Grussendorf-Conen. 1997. Routine detection of herpes simplex virus and varicella zoster virus by polymerase chain reaction reveals that initial herpes zoster is frequently misdiagnosed as herpes simplex. Br. J. Dermatol. 137:259-261[CrossRef][Medline].
11.	Sauerbrei, A., U. Eichorn, M. Schacke, and P. Wutzler. 1999. Laboratory diagnosis of herpes zoster. J. Clin. Virol. 14:31-36[CrossRef][Medline].
12.	Schmidt, N. J., D. Gallo, V. Devlin, J. D. Woodie, and R. W. Emmons. 1980. Direct immunofluorescence staining for detection of herpes simplex and varicella-zoster virus antigens in vesicular lesions and certain tissue specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 12:651-655[Abstract/Free Full Text].
13.	Shirm, J., J. J. Muelenberg, G. W. Pastoor, P. C. Van Voorst Vader, and F. P. Schroder. 1989. Rapid detection of varicella-zoster virus in clinical specimens using monoclonal antibodies on shell vials and smears. J. Med. Virol. 28:1-6[Medline].
14.	Smith, T. F., and A. D. Wold. 1991. Changing trends of diagnostic virology in a tertiary care medical center. Med. Virol. 10:1-20.
15.	Soushi, S., H. Ozawa, M. Matsuhashi, J. Shimazaki, U. Saga, and T. Kurata. 1988. Demonstration of varicella-zoster virus antigens in the vitreous aspirates of patients with acute retinal necrosis syndrome. Ophthalmology 95:1394-1398[Medline].
16.	Weller, T. H. 1992. Varicella and herpes zoster: a perspective and overview. J. Infect. Dis. 166(Suppl. 1):S1-S6.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Kido, S, Sugita, S, Horie, S, Miyanaga, M, Miyata, K, Shimizu, N, Morio, T, Mochizuki, M (2008). Association of varicella zoster virus load in the aqueous humor with clinical manifestations of anterior uveitis in herpes zoster ophthalmicus and zoster sine herpete. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 92: 505-508 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Binnicker, M. J., Buckwalter, S. P., Eisberner, J. J., Stewart, R. A., McCullough, A. E., Wohlfiel, S. L., Wengenack, N. L. (2007). Detection of Coccidioides Species in Clinical Specimens by Real-Time PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45: 173-178 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Natarajan, G., Johnson, Y. R., Zhang, F., Chen, K. M., Worsham, M. J. (2006). Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction for the Rapid Detection of Group B Streptococcal Colonization in Neonates. Pediatrics 118: 14-22 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Espy, M. J., Uhl, J. R., Sloan, L. M., Buckwalter, S. P., Jones, M. F., Vetter, E. A., Yao, J. D. C., Wengenack, N. L., Rosenblatt, J. E., Cockerill, F. R. III, Smith, T. F. (2006). Real-Time PCR in Clinical Microbiology: Applications for Routine Laboratory Testing. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 19: 165-256 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Aslanzadeh, J. (2004). Preventing PCR Amplification Carryover Contamination in a Clinical Laboratory. Annals of Clinical & Laboratory Science 34: 389-396 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Nitsche, A., Ellerbrok, H., Pauli, G. (2004). Detection of Orthopoxvirus DNA by Real-Time PCR and Identification of Variola Virus DNA by Melting Analysis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 1207-1213 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Weidmann, M., Meyer-Konig, U., Hufert, F. T. (2003). Rapid Detection of Herpes Simplex Virus and Varicella-Zoster Virus Infections by Real-Time PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 1565-1568 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• van Doornum, G. J. J., Guldemeester, J., Osterhaus, A. D. M. E., Niesters, H. G. M. (2003). Diagnosing Herpesvirus Infections by Real-Time Amplification and Rapid Culture. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 576-580 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Li, H., Dummer, J. S., Estes, W. R., Meng, S., Wright, P. F., Tang, Y.-W. (2003). Measurement of Human Cytomegalovirus Loads by Quantitative Real-Time PCR for Monitoring Clinical Intervention in Transplant Recipients. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 187-191 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Uhl, J. R., Adamson, S. C., Vetter, E. A., Schleck, C. D., Harmsen, W. S., Iverson, L. K., Santrach, P. J., Henry, N. K., Cockerill, F. R. (2003). Comparison of LightCycler PCR, Rapid Antigen Immunoassay, and Culture for Detection of Group A Streptococci from Throat Swabs. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 242-249 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Miller, N., Cleary, T., Kraus, G., Young, A. K., Spruill, G., Hnatyszyn, H. J. (2002). Rapid and Specific Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from Acid-Fast Bacillus Smear-Positive Respiratory Specimens and BacT/ALERT MP Culture Bottles by Using Fluorogenic Probes and Real-Time PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 4143-4147 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Fukunaga, H., Murakami, T., Gondo, T., Sugi, K., Ishihara, T. (2002). Sensitivity of Acid-Fast Staining for Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Formalin-fixed Tissue. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 166: 994-997 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Espy, M. J., Cockerill III, F. R., Meyer, R. F., Bowen, M. D., Poland, G. A., Hadfield, T. L., Smith, T. F. (2002). Detection of Smallpox Virus DNA by LightCycler PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 1985-1988 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Druce, J., Catton, M., Chibo, D., Minerds, K., Tyssen, D., Kostecki, R., Maskill, B., Leong-Shaw, W., Gerrard, M., Birch, C. (2002). Utility of a Multiplex PCR Assay for Detecting Herpesvirus DNA in Clinical Samples. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 1728-1732 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Mackay, I. M., Arden, K. E., Nitsche, A. (2002). Real-time PCR in virology. Nucleic Acids Res 30: 1292-1305 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Whiley, D. M., Mackay, I. M., Sloots, T. P. (2001). Detection and Differentiation of Human Polyomaviruses JC and BK by LightCycler PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39: 4357-4361 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Read, S. J., Mitchell, J. L., Fink, C. G. (2001). LightCycler Multiplex PCR for the Laboratory Diagnosis of Common Viral Infections of the Central Nervous System. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39: 3056-3059 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Espy, M. J., Rys, P. N., Wold, A. D., Uhl, J. R., Sloan, L. M., Jenkins, G. D., Ilstrup, D. M., Cockerill, F. R. III, Patel, R., Rosenblatt, J. E., Smith, T. F. (2001). Detection of Herpes Simplex Virus DNA in Genital and Dermal Specimens by LightCycler PCR after Extraction using the IsoQuick, MagNA Pure, and BioRobot 9604 Methods. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39: 2233-2236 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Foy, C. A., Parkes, H. C. (2001). Emerging Homogeneous DNA-based Technologies in the Clinical Laboratory. Clin. Chem. 47: 990-1000 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kessler, H. H., Muhlbauer, G., Stelzl, E., Daghofer, E., Santner, B. I., Marth, E. (2001). Fully Automated Nucleic Acid Extraction: MagNA Pure LC. Clin. Chem. 47: 1124-1126 [Full Text]  

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Espy, M. J. Articles by Smith, T. F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Espy, M. J. Articles by Smith, T. F.