Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, January 2001, p. 328-331, Vol. 39, No. 1
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.1.328-331.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Binary Typing of Staphylococcus aureus Strains through
Reversed Hybridization Using Digoxigenin-Universal Linkage
System-Labeled Bacterial Genomic DNA
Willem
van
Leeuwen,1,*
Christel
Libregts,2
Marjolijn
Schalk,2
Jack
Veuskens,2
Henri
Verbrugh,1 and
Alex
van Belkum1
Department of Medical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam,
3015 GD Rotterdam,1 and KREATECH
Diagnostics, 1032 LG Amsterdam,2 The Netherlands
Received 17 July 2000/Returned for modification 18 September
2000/Accepted 12 October 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
A novel binary typing (BT) procedure, based on reversed
hybridization of digoxigenin-universal linkage system-labeled bacterial DNA to strip-immobilized probes, is presented. Chromogenic detection of
hybrids was performed. Staphylococcus aureus isolates
(n = 20) were analyzed to establish the feasibility of
BT. A technically simple and fast procedure has been developed for
application in routine microbiology laboratories.
 |
TEXT |
Reliable probe-based microbial
typing systems are not yet commonplace in microbiological practice
(1, 4, 7, 8, 12). In the past we identified domains that
are differentially present within the staphylococcal genome on the
basis of randomly amplified polymorphic DNA analysis. These
probes were used to develop a DNA probe-based typing approach.
The strain-specific DNA probes provide a simple binary output and have
been presented before (13-15). We describe here the
development of a new format for the binary typing technique. In the
newly described procedure DNA is extracted from overnight
Staphylococcus aureus cultures, labeled with the digoxigenin
(DIG)-universal linkage system (ULS) (9), and reversibly
hybridized to strips containing the immobilized probes. Signal is
generated by chromogenic staining, and binary types can be read
visually. This novel binary typing system will be introduced, and its
versatility will be discussed.
Well-characterized strains of S. aureus (n = 20) were obtained from a reference collection (10).
Isolates were cultured onto blood agar plates at least once, and single
colonies were used for further testing.
DNA was isolated (i) by the protocol described by Boom et al.
(3), (ii) with a miniprep of bacterial genomic DNA with a cetyltrimethylammonium bromide-NaCl solution (2), (iii) by extraction with phenol-chloroform (5), and (iv) by
proteinase K-sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-treatment and boiling.
Another method (method v) consisted of simple DNA isolation by 10 min of boiling only. An alkaline method (method vi) for DNA extraction was
used as well. Finally, a method (method vii) used the Wizard genomic
DNA purification kit. The extraction of staphylococcal DNA was
performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. The DNA size
distribution and the concentrations of all preparations were estimated
by gel electrophoresis and were compared to those of a reference series
of bacteriophage
DNA (5). DNA was stored at
20°C
for labeling and hybridization experiments.
For the optimization of DNA labeling, purified S. aureus DNA
was labeled by using three different ratios (micrograms of DNA versus units of ULS), namely, 1:1, 1:2, and 1:4
(digoxigenin-ULYSIS nucleotide labeling kit; KREATECH
Diagnostics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). A serial dilution of labeled
DNA from all strains (1 µl) was spotted onto a membrane to check the
labeling efficiency. The procedures for the generation, validation, and
application of the 12 strain-specific DNA probes have been described in
detail elsewhere (13-15). Purified DNA probes
(n = 12) were spotted (1 µl) onto a membrane strip (5 by 80 mm; Hybond N+; Amersham Life Science, Little
Chalfont, United Kingdom). For hybridization quality control, 10 ng of
petunia DNA (LMC 1322) and 0.25 ng of the S. aureus
amplified nuc gene (6) were spotted as negative
and positive hybridization controls, respectively. The DNA probes were
denatured by 0.5 M NaOH-1.5 M NaCl treatment for 15 min at room
temperature. Subsequently, the strips were neutralized with 0.5 M
Tris-HCl-1.5 M NaCl (pH 7.4) for 15 min at room temperature (RT). The
strips were washed with 2× SSC (1× SSC is 0.15 M NaCl plus 0.015 M
sodium citrate (5), and the denatured DNA was cross-linked
on the strip with UV light (280 nm). Each strip was transferred into a
Greiner tube (15 ml), and 1 ml of DIG Easy Hyb buffer (Roche Molecular
Biochemicals, Almere, The Netherlands) was added. The labeled DNA was
denatured for 5 min at 100°C and quenched on ice. The sample was
centrifuged to collect condensate, and 1 ml of DIG Easy Hyb buffer was
added. The labeled DNA was then added to the hybridization mixture, and the mixture was incubated overnight at 42°C in a rotation oven. After
hybridization, the strips were washed twice in 2× SSC-0.1% SDS for 5 min each time at RT and twice in 0.5× SSC-0.1% SDS for 15 min each
time at 68°C. The strips were processed by the protocol accompanying
the Roche Molecular Biochemicals hybridization kit. After
posthybridization wash steps, the strips were equilibrated in 1×
maleic buffer for 1 min. The strips were blocked for 30 to 60 min at RT
with 1× blocking buffer under slight agitation. The strips were
incubated with conjugate (anti-DIG alkaline phosphatase conjugate, 150 mU/ml) for 10 min at RT. The strips were washed twice for 15 min each
time in 1× wash buffer at RT and were equilibrated twice for 5 min
each time in detection buffer. Finally, the strips were incubated in
freshly prepared color substrate (nitroblue tetrazolium-5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolylphosphate ready-to-use
tablets; Roche Molecular Biochemicals) for a maximum of 3 h at RT in
the dark. Hybridization of labeled genomic DNA with each of the 12 different DNA probes (probes AW-1 through AW-12) was scored with a 1 or
a 0 according to the presence or absence of the hybridization signal,
respectively. The combination of hybridization results forms the binary type.
The current conditions for the binary typing procedure are summarized
below and are outlined in Fig. 1. Genomic
staphylococcal DNA was purified with the Wizard genomic DNA
purification kit and labeled with DIG-ULS (target DNA versus label at a
ratio of 1:1). A concentration of 200 ng of labeled DNA per ml of
hybridization buffer was used.
The hybridization results for the S. aureus strain
collection, determined by the currently developed reversed
hybridization procedure, are depicted in Fig.
2 and are specified in Table
1. Strains 1 to 5 (Fig. 2, lanes 1 to 5, respectively)
showed identical binary codes. Strains 6 to 10 (Fig. 2, lanes 6 to 10, respectively), representing genetically related strains, displayed
binary patterns that varied for no more than 2 of the 12 probes. Of the
10 unique strains (Fig. 2, lanes 11 to 20, respectively), all except
strains 18 and 19 exhibited unique binary codes.

View larger version (76K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Binary typing results for the methicillin-resistant
S. aureus strain collection obtained after hybridization on
the strip-immobilized DNA probe panel (probes AW-1 through AW-15).
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1.
Comparative analysis of characteristics obtained by the
binary typing technique and other genotyping methods for the panel
of methicillin-resistant S. aureus
strainsa
|
|
Here we present a new format of binary typing as an example of a
single-species typing test developed for the characterization of
S. aureus strains. In previous studies, we defined the
resolution, reproducibility, and stability of the epidemiological
markers of the binary typing technique (11, 13-15).
Technically speaking, the initial method, which involves repeated
hybridization of the probe to digested staphylococcal DNA, was complex
and time-consuming. We therefore developed a simple and fast format for
the characterization of S. aureus strains based on reversed
hybridization with 12 strip-immobilized DNA probes. The major advantage
of ULS labeling for this application is the direct labeling of
culture-amplified total genomic S. aureus DNA (target
labeling). The additional value of binary typing is its simplicity,
speed, reproducibility, and lack of need for expensive peripheral
equipment. The efficiency of the labeling reaction with DIG-ULS
(9) depends on the time, the temperature, the label-to-DNA ratio, and the purity of the DNA. A simple and
standardized procedure resulted in optimal labeling and hybridization
results. Hybridization conditions and probe and target concentrations
were optimized.
The data obtained by the novel binary typing protocol are identical to
those that were obtained by the coventional binary typing method.
Epidemiologically linked strains were again identified as clusters,
whereas unique isolates were well differentiated. The reversed
hybridization data are corroborated by those obtained by other typing
techniques such as pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and randomly
amplified polymorphic DNA analysis (Table 1).
The new binary typing protocol described here provides a simple and
fast probe-based molecular typing strategy for the characterization of
S. aureus strains and generates easily interpretable
results, which can be compiled in a database. This culture-amplified
nucleic acid probe technology can be developed for the characterization of other species and can be easily expanded with probes that directly detect genes associated with virulence factors and resistance determinants. It may be concluded that this technique comprises a
compact, user-friendly S. aureus typing system suitable for use in the development of an international database for both
methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant S. aureus
strains. In addition, the binary typing system has the clear potential
to be useful in peripheral laboratories as well. The interlaboratory
reproducibility of the assay is currently the subject of a multicenter study.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
Sharmila Naidoo is acknowledged for critical reading of the manuscript.
This study was partially funded by the Dutch Ministry of Economic
Affairs (project BTS 97134).
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Erasmus
University Medical Center Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD
Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Phone: 31-10-4633668. Fax: 31-10-4633875. E-mail: vanleeuwen{at}bacl.azr.nl.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Allerberger, F., and S. J. Fritschel.
1999.
Use of automated ribotyping of Austrian Listeria monocytogenes isolates to support epidemiological typing.
J. Microbiol. Methods
35:237-244[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Anonymous.
1994.
Preparation of genomic DNA from bacteria, p. 2.4.1-2.4.2.
In
R. B. F. M. Ausubel, R. E. Kingston, D. D. Moore, J. G. Seidman, J. A. Smith, and K. Struhl (ed.), Current protocols in molecular biology, vol. 1. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y.
|
| 3.
|
Boom, R.,
C. J. Sol,
M. M. Salimans,
C. L. Jansen,
P. M. Wertheim-van Dillen, and J. van der Noordaa.
1990.
Rapid and simple method for purification of nucleic acids.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
28:495-503[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Kamerbeek, J.,
L. Schouls,
A. Kolk,
M. van Agterveld,
D. van Soolingen,
S. Kuijper,
A. Bunschoten,
H. Molhuizen,
R. Shaw,
M. Goyal, and J. van Embden.
1997.
Simultaneous detection and strain differentiation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis for diagnosis and epidemiology.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
35:907-914[Abstract].
|
| 5.
|
Sambrook, J. E.,
E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis.
1989.
Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 6.
|
Shortle, D.
1983.
A genetic system for analysis of staphylococcal nuclease.
Gene
22:181-189[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Spratt, B. G.
1999.
Multilocus sequence typing: molecular typing of bacterial pathogens in an era of rapid DNA sequencing and the internet.
Curr. Opin. Microbiol.
2:312-316[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 8.
|
van Belkum, A.,
J. Kluytmans,
W. van Leeuwen,
R. Bax,
W. Quint,
E. Peters,
A. Fluit,
C. Vandenbroucke-Grauls,
A. van den Brule,
H. Koeleman,
W. Melchers,
J. Meis,
A. Elaichouni,
M. Vaneechoute,
F. Moonens,
N. Maes,
M. Struelens,
F. Tenover, and H. Verbrugh.
1995.
Multicenter evaluation of arbitrarily primed PCR for typing of Staphylococcus aureus strains.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
33:1537-1547[Abstract].
|
| 9.
|
van Belkum, A.,
E. Linkels,
T. Jelsma,
F. M. van den Berg, and W. Quint.
1994.
Non-isotopic labeling of DNA by newly developed hapten-containing platinum compounds.
BioTechniques
16:148-153[Medline]. (Erratum, 18:636, 1995.)
|
| 10.
|
van Belkum, A.,
W. van Leeuwen,
M. E. Kaufmann,
B. Cookson,
F. Forey,
J. Etienne,
R. Goering,
F. Tenover,
C. Steward,
F. O'Brien,
W. Grubb,
P. Tassios,
N. Legakis,
A. Morvan,
N. El Solh,
R. de Ryck,
M. Struelens,
S. Salmenlinna,
J. Vuopio-Varkila,
M. Kooistra,
A. Talens,
W. Witte, and H. Verbrugh.
1998.
Assessment of resolution and intercenter reproducibility of results of genotyping Staphylococcus aureus by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of SmaI macrorestriction fragments: a multicenter study.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
36:1653-1659[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
van Belkum, A.,
W. van Leeuwen,
R. Verkooyen,
S. C. Sacilik,
C. Cokmus, and H. Verbrugh.
1997.
Dissemination of a single clone of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among Turkish hospitals.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
35:978-981[Abstract].
|
| 12.
|
van der Zee, A.,
H. Verbakel,
J. C. van Zon,
I. Frenay,
A. van Belkum,
M. Peeters,
A. Buiting, and A. Bergmans.
1999.
Molecular genotyping of Staphylococcus aureus strains: comparison of repetitive element sequence-based PCR with various typing methods and isolation of a novel epidemicity marker.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
37:342-349[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
van Leeuwen, W.,
M. Sijmons,
J. Sluijs,
H. Verbrugh, and A. van Belkum.
1996.
On the nature and use of randomly amplified DNA from Staphylococcus aureus.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
34:2770-2777[Abstract].
|
| 14.
|
van Leeuwen, W.,
A. van Belkum,
B. Kreiswirth, and H. Verbrugh.
1998.
Genetic diversification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus as a function of prolonged geographic dissemination and as measured by binary typing and other genotyping methods.
Res. Microbiol.
149:497-507[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
van Leeuwen, W.,
H. Verbrugh,
J. van der Velden,
N. van Leeuwen,
M. Heck, and A. van Belkum.
1999.
Validation of binary typing for Staphylococcus aureus strains.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
37:664-674[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, January 2001, p. 328-331, Vol. 39, No. 1
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.1.328-331.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Willemse-Erix, D. F. M., Scholtes-Timmerman, M. J., Jachtenberg, J.-W., van Leeuwen, W. B., Horst-Kreft, D., Bakker Schut, T. C., Deurenberg, R. H., Puppels, G. J., van Belkum, A., Vos, M. C., Maquelin, K.
(2009). Optical Fingerprinting in Bacterial Epidemiology: Raman Spectroscopy as a Real-Time Typing Method. J. Clin. Microbiol.
47: 652-659
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Singh, A., Goering, R. V., Simjee, S., Foley, S. L., Zervos, M. J.
(2006). Application of Molecular Techniques to the Study of Hospital Infection. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
19: 512-530
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Somer, L., Danin-Poleg, Y., Diamant, E., Gur-Arie, R., Palti, Y., Kashi, Y.
(2005). Amplified Intergenic Locus Polymorphism as a Basis for Bacterial Typing of Listeria spp. and Escherichia coli. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
71: 3144-3152
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Gilot, P., van Leeuwen, W.
(2004). Comparative Analysis of agr Locus Diversification and Overall Genetic Variability among Bovine and Human Staphylococcus aureus Isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol.
42: 1265-1269
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Koning, S., van Belkum, A., Snijders, S., van Leeuwen, W., Verbrugh, H., Nouwen, J., Op 't Veld, M., van Suijlekom-Smit, L. W. A., van der Wouden, J. C., Verduin, C.
(2003). Severity of Nonbullous Staphylococcus aureus Impetigo in Children Is Associated with Strains Harboring Genetic Markers for Exfoliative Toxin B, Panton-Valentine Leukocidin, and the Multidrug Resistance Plasmid pSK41. J. Clin. Microbiol.
41: 3017-3021
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Zadoks, R. N., van Leeuwen, W. B., Kreft, D., Fox, L. K., Barkema, H. W., Schukken, Y. H., van Belkum, A.
(2002). Comparison of Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Bovine and Human Skin, Milking Equipment, and Bovine Milk by Phage Typing, Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis, and Binary Typing. J. Clin. Microbiol.
40: 3894-3902
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
van Gijlswijk, R. P.M., Talman, E. G., Peekel, I., Bloem, J., van Velzen, M. A., Heetebrij, R. J., Tanke, H. J.
(2002). Use of Horseradish Peroxidase- and Fluorescein-modified Cisplatin Derivatives for Simultaneous Labeling of Nucleic Acids and Proteins. Clin. Chem.
48: 1352-1359
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
(2002). Molecular typing of micro-organisms: at the centre of diagnostics, genomics and pathogenesis of infectious diseases?. J Med Microbiol
51: 7-10
[Full Text]