Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, January 2001, p. 392-393, Vol. 39, No. 1
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.1.392-393.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Skin Disease Presenting as an Outbreak of
Pseudobacteremia in a Laboratory Worker
A.
Simhon,*
G.
Rahav,
M.
Shapiro, and
C.
Block
Department of Clinical Microbiology and
Infectious Diseases, Hadassah University Hospital, Ein Kerem, Jerusalem
Received 14 August 2000/Returned for modification 16 September
2000/Accepted 27 October 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
An outbreak of pseudobacteremia due to Streptococcus
pyogenes (group A streptococci [GAS]) and
methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) was
traced to the venting procedure for aerobic bottles prior to their
loading into the incubator of the BacT/Alert analyzer (Organon
Teknika). Bacteria shed by a laboratory worker suffering from impetigo
and cellulitis contaminated the aerobic bottles of 10 patients. All
blood culture isolates, in addition to the isolates from the laboratory
worker, were of the same GAS M and T types. All MSSA isolates from
blood cultures and the index case's hands had the same lytic phage
profile. Procedural breakdowns were identified in the laboratory.
Bottles were vented outside the biological safety cabinet, gloves were
not worn, and unprotected needles were used for the venting procedure.
The source of the aspirated bacteria that contaminated the bottles was
identified and the index case was treated promptly.
 |
TEXT |
Hadassah University Hospital, Ein
Kerem, Jerusalem, is a 650-bed, tertiary-care teaching hospital. Blood
cultures have been performed using the BacT/Alert system since 1995. Approximately 3,600 bottles (1,800 blood culture sets) are processed
monthly. We describe an unusual episode of blood culture contamination which led to the diagnosis of severe skin infection in a laboratory worker.
Description of the incident.
On day 1, a Friday, positive
bottled blood cultures taken from 25 patients on the previous day were
detected. Gram-stained smears revealed that the bottles for 11 patients
harbored gram-positive cocci in chains, and 5 of these 11 patients also
had gram-positive cocci in clusters.
The finding of streptococci in 11 patients was an extraordinary
occurrence. All of the positive bottles had been loaded into the
instrument the day before, and it was noticed that all streptococci were observed in aerobic bottles only. Aerobic bottles in the BacT/Alert system require venting immediately prior to being loaded in
the instrument, so pseudobacteremia was suspected immediately. After a
preliminary procedural review it was hypothesized that bottles had been
contaminated during the venting procedure. Bottles are habitually
underfilled at our institution, and so the remaining vacuum results in
relatively large volumes of air being aspirated at venting. The
cultures had been sent from different areas in the hospital. Despite
the expectation that the likely contaminants would be viridans
streptococci and coagulase-negative staphylococci, the infectious
disease consultant on call contacted the wards. Two seriously ill
patients were started on vancomycin. The parents of one pediatric
patient discharged from the emergency room were contacted by phone and
asked to return to the hospital for reevaluation.
On day 2, it was established that, contrary to our original assumption,
the cultures contained a mixture of
Streptococcus pyogenes
(group A streptococci [GAS]) and methicillin-susceptible
Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) from 10 of the 11 patients. The
time
to positivity in the BacT/Alert ranged from 10.2 to 15.3 h.
The
bottle of one patient in hematology who was receiving vancomycin
yielded
Klebsiella pneumoniae in addition to GAS and MSSA.
However,
it could not be established whether the former was the cause
of
genuine bacteremia, since fever was concomitant with end-stage
lymphoma.
Streptococcus pneumoniae was recovered from the
blood
cultures of the remaining
patient.
On day 3 (Sunday, the start of the working week), the procedure for
venting blood cultures was reviewed, and major breakdowns
were
identified. It was established that gloves were not worn
by two of the
three laboratory workers who vented bottles on day
0 and that venting
took place outside the biological safety cabinet.
These precautions are
included in the venting procedure, since
regular needles for injection
are used in our laboratory instead
of the covered venting needles sold
by the manufacturer of the
BacT/Alert.
The infectious disease consultant interviewed the staff involved with
reception of the blood cultures in the laboratory. One
of the
laboratory workers had an infected eczematous lesion evident
on his
hand and a large ulcerating cellulitic lesion on his left
lower
extremity. GAS and MSSA were recovered in cultures taken
from all the
lesions, and GAS was isolated from his throat. He
was placed on sick
leave and treated with an oral cephalosporin
and mupirocin
ointment.
Results and discussion.
All blood culture isolates, in
addition to the isolates from the laboratory worker, were sent to
national reference laboratories for GAS M and T typing and
staphylococcal phage typing. All GAS isolates from the blood cultures
and the index case were typed as M3, T 3/13/B3264. All MSSA isolates
from blood cultures and the index case's hands were completely lysed
by phages 95 and D11/HK2, while the MSSA from his leg lesion was phage
type 79.
This outbreak of pseudobacteremia was most probably related to the
faulty venting of aerobic bottles in the BacT/Alert blood
culture
system. The clinical impact of the event was substantial.
Apart from
the several hours of additional work for senior Infectious
Diseases
consultants and laboratory staff, two patients received
vancomycin
during the first 24 h of the incident and one patient
was
readmitted for observation and discharged shortly thereafter.
Correct
procedures for venting the bottles were immediately reinstituted
and
laboratory staff were advised regarding health self-awareness.
The
incident was rapidly contained, and the index case was identified
and
treated within 48
h.
Pseudobacteremia with
S. aureus and
S. pyogenes
has been described previously in association with a laboratory worker
suffering
from a sore throat who contaminated blood cultures when
performing
blind subcultures after an initial 24-h incubation period
(
4).
Pseudobacteremia with
S. aureus has also
been associated with
an asymptomatic laboratory worker who had
nasopharyngeal colonization
(
1) and with a physician who
had an active skin infection and
nasal colonization and was assumed to
have contaminated the cultures
upon inoculation (
5).
Cross-contamination with GAS (
3) and
S. aureus
(
2) in radiometric analyzers was traced to defective
needle
sterilization.
We did not use the venting needles supplied by Organon Teknika, the
manufacturer of the BacT/Alert blood culture system. Removal
of the
lower part of this device exposes a short, unfiltered,
beveled needle,
which is inserted into the bottle. This procedure
allows gas exchange
via the needle. It is doubtful whether this
device would have prevented
the contamination in this case, in
view of the large volumes of air
aspirated and the likelihood
that the index case probably shed vast
numbers of bacteria from
his lesions. Nevertheless, our procedure was
changed to deploy
needles designed for vacuum tube blood collection,
since their
structure is essentially the same as that of the Organon
Teknika
units. This incident underscores that awareness of potential
pitfalls
and strict adherence to procedures are crucial in avoiding
false-positive
results. The incident described here resulted from a
frank procedural
breakdown in the presence of a highly contaminated
environment.
The planned introduction of bottles not requiring venting
will
prevent such
mishaps.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Hadassah University
Hospital, Ein Kerem, Jerusalem. Phone: 972-2-677-6543. Fax:
972-2-641-9545. E-mail: simhon{at}hadassah.org.il.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Centers for Disease Control.
1979.
Pseudobacteremia due to Staphylococcus aureus New York.
Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep.
28:82-83.
|
| 2.
|
Craven, D. E.,
D. A. Lichtenberg,
K. F. Brown,
D. M. Coffey,
T. L. Treadwell, and W. R. McCase.
1984.
Pseudobacteremia traced to cross-contamination by an automatic blood culture analyzer.
Infect. Control
5:75-78[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Griffin, M. R.,
A. D. Miller, and A. C. Davis.
1982.
Blood culture cross-contamination associated with a radiometric analyzer.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
15:567-570[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Smith, G. E., and D. A. Cook.
1989.
Streptococcus pyogenes and Staphylococcus aureus pseudobacteremia.
J. Infect.
18:194-195[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Spivak, M. L.,
R. Shannon,
G. A. Natsios, and J. Wood.
1980.
Two epidemics of pseudobacteremia due to Staphylococcus aureus and Aerococcus viridans.
Infect. Control
1:321-323[Medline].
|
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, January 2001, p. 392-393, Vol. 39, No. 1
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.1.392-393.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.