Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, October 2001, p. 3578-3582, Vol. 39, No. 10
Division of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory
Medicine and Pathology,1 and Department of
Health Sciences Research,2 Mayo Clinic,
Rochester, Minnesota 55905, and PE Biosystems, Foster City,
California 944043
Received 11 January 2001/Returned for modification 14 May
2001/Accepted 16 July 2001
In a previous study which evaluated the BACTEC 9240 automated blood culture system (Becton Dickinson Diagnostic Instrument Systems, Sparks, Md.), we noted a 1.3% "instrument false-positive" rate. That is, the BACTEC system signaled that a bottle (BACTEC Plus
Aerobic/F bottle or BACTEC Anaerobic Lytic/10 bottle) culture was
positive but a Gram stain was negative and there was no growth of
bacteria or yeasts on subculture to chocolate agar. Furthermore, from
the same sample of blood, cultures for fungi using the Isolator blood
culture system (Wampole Laboratories, Cranbury, N.J.) were negative for
growth. For the present study, we evaluated 76 instrument false-positive samples for the presence of 16S ribosomal DNA using the
MicroSeq 500 kit (PE Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.). These samples
also were negative for fungi by the Isolator method. This kit has a PCR
module and sequencing module for the amplification and sequencing of
the 16S RNA gene and provides a database for sequence alignment and
identification of bacteria. To optimize the assay, we evaluated
the effect of adding 0.5% bovine serum albumin to the sample from
blood culture bottles and found that it decreased the effects of
inhibitors on the PCR. Two control groups of blood culture specimens
were also evaluated. One group (n = 45) were
"instrument true positives"; the instrument signaled positive, and
subsequent Gram stains were positive and subcultures on chocolate agar
grew bacteria. The other group (n = 20) were "instrument true negatives"; the instrument signaled negative, the
Gram stain was negative, and subcultures on chocolate agar and from the
Isolator tube on fungal media showed no growth. None of the 76 instrument false-positive samples had evidence for 16S rRNA gene
sequences. All of the instrument true-positive samples and all
of the instrument true-negative specimens were positive and negative,
respectively, using the MicroSeq 500 kit. Total peripheral white blood
cell counts were statistically significantly higher for patients who
had instrument false-positive results than for patients who had
instrument true-positive or true-negative results
(P = 0.001). We conclude that instrument false
positives signaled by the BACTEC 9240 system are not due to bacteria in the blood culture samples.
Bacteremia has become a
major nosocomial infection in most medical centers and represents a
formidable source of morbidity and mortality (1, 14, 19,
26). Patients with bloodstream infections have a
three-times-greater risk of dying than that expected from the
underlying diseases alone (27). It has been estimated that
there are 500,000 cases of bacteremia each year, with an associated
crude mortality of 35% (28). The rapid and reliable
detection and subsequent identification of microorganisms from blood
remain critical so that the appropriate antimicrobial therapy can be provided.
DNA sequencing of conserved regions within phylogenetically informative
genetic targets, such as the small-subunit (16S) rRNA gene, is
promising as a means for identifying bacteria (5, 9, 22,
27). Broad-range PCR primers can be used to amplify highly
conserved regions of the 16S rRNA gene from a wide range of organisms;
highly variable regions within the amplicon permit phylogenetic
analysis and, in many cases, species-level identification (7,
29). Recently, a commercial system, MicroSeq 500 (PE Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.), for identifying bacterial species based on
amplification and sequence analysis of the first 527 bp of the 16S rRNA
genes has become available (18, 23). In the present study,
we evaluated the ability of the MicroSeq 500 system to detect and
identify bacteria directly from blood cultures signaled as positive by
the BACTEC 9240 blood culture system (Becton Dickinson Diagnostic
Instrument Systems, Sparks, Md.).
The BACTEC 9240 blood culture system uses infrared spectrophotometry to
monitor carbon dioxide produced by microorganisms on a continuous
basis. This system has been shown to be more sensitive than other
systems for the detection of a variety of microorganisms in blood. A
recent study by our group demonstrated that this system had a 1.3%
"instrument false-positive" rate; a positive signal occurred, but
both Gram stain and subculture of the specimen on chocolate agar media
showed no growth of bacteria or yeasts. Furthermore, culture of the
same sample of blood for fungi using the Isolator blood culture
system (Wampole Laboratories, Cranbury, N.J.) were negative for growth
(2).
The objectives of the present study were to determine the utility of
the MicroSeq 500 system to directly identify bacteria in blood culture
bottles that were (i) BACTEC instrument true positives (the instrument
signaled positive, and subsequent Gram stains were positive, and
subcultures on chocolate agar grew bacteria) and (ii) BACTEC
instrument false positives.
Clinical specimens.
Aliquots of broth from blood culture
bottles (BACTEC Plus Aerobic/F bottle and BACTEC Anaerobic Lytic/10
bottle) that signaled positive by the BACTEC 9240 blood culture system
were collected and saved at 4°C. All DNA extractions were done within
2 to 5 days after the positive instrument signal occurred. A total of 76 instrument false-positive samples, 45 instrument
true-positive samples (n = 45), and 20 instrument
true-negative samples (negative Gram stain and no growth of bacteria or
yeast on subculture on chocolate agar and for the same sample no growth
of fungi from the Isolator blood culture system) were collected.
Inoculation, processing, and incubation procedures for the BACTEC 9240 blood culture system (used for the BACTEC Plus Aerobic/F bottle and the
BACTEC Anaerobic Lytic/10 bottle) and the Isolator blood culture system
were described previously (2).
Patient leukocyte count.
All leukocyte counts were performed
in the Mayo Clinic Hematology Laboratory using a model STKS counter
(Coulter Corporation, Miami, Fla.).
Acridine orange stain.
Samples of all instrument
false-positive blood cultures were stained with acridine orange (Becton
Dickinson) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. Smears
were examined at 1,000× magnification with an oil immersion objective
using a fluorescence microscope.
Phenotypic identification of bacteria.
Conventional
biochemical tests were used for the phenotypic identification of
aerobic and anaerobic bacteria (22, 24). For some
nonfermenting aerobic bacteria, the MicroLog system, release 4.0 (Biolog, Inc., Hayward, Calif.), was used.
DNA extraction and PCR amplification.
Nucleic acids from 200 µl of the contents of blood culture aerobic and anaerobic bottles
were extracted by using the IsoQuick kit (ORCA Research, Inc., Bothell,
Wash.) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Extracted DNA was
suspended in 100 µl of water and was stored at Genotypic identification of bacteria by sequence analysis of the
16S rRNA gene.
The remaining PCR products were purified prior to
sequencing. Each 6 µl of PCR product was mixed with 1 µl of 1-U/ml
shrimp alkaline phosphatase (Amersham Life Science, Inc., Piscataway, N.J.) and 1 µl of 10-U/ml exonuclease I (Amersham Life Science, Inc.), incubated at 37°C for 30 min, and then incubated at 80°C for
15 min. The PCR products (527 bp) were then sequenced with the
fluorescent dye terminator cycle sequencing kit, which included 16S
sequencing primers 0005F and 0531R; sequencing was performed on
a GeneAmp PCR 9600 thermal cycler. Sequences were determined by
electrophoresis with the ABI PRISM 377 automated DNA sequencer. Using
the MicroSeq 500 microbial identification and analysis software, fragmentary sequence information was aligned and assembled, and the
final consensus sequence was compared with over 1,200 validated 16S
ribosomal DNA (rDNA) sequences in the database (18, 21). Identification of a specific bacterium was determined by phylogenetic analysis.
Effect of BSA on PCR.
During the evaluation of instrument
true-positive blood cultures, we found that samples from the BACTEC
9240 aerobic and anaerobic blood culture bottles demonstrated
significant inhibition of PCR. Enough material was available from 36 of
the 45 true-positive samples to study the role that BSA may play in
overcoming the PCR-inhibitory effects. As shown in Table
1, if DNA samples were not diluted before
amplification, the rate of positivity was only 32%. Upon dilution of
samples to 1:1,000, the amplification rate improved to 79%.
Pretreatment of specimens by red blood cell lysis and/or
centrifugation before extraction of DNA did not appreciably affect PCR
inhibition (data not shown). However, by addition of 0.5% BSA to the
PCR mixture, inhibition of PCR was essentially eliminated (Table 1).
The PCR-positive rate increased from 53 to 97% (35 out of 36 samples)
with BSA at a DNA sample dilution of 1:10. There was a reduction in
sensitivity (92%) of the PCR when samples were diluted to 1:100.
However, when running samples at both 1:10 and 1:100 dilutions, we
could achieve 100% sensitivity. All the 20 instrument true negatives
were PCR negative.
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.10.3578-3582.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Direct Identification of Bacteria from Positive Blood Cultures by
Amplification and Sequencing of the 16S rRNA Gene: Evaluation of
BACTEC 9240 Instrument True- Positive and False-Positive
Results


![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
70°C until use.
DNA samples were further diluted with water at 1:10 and 1:100 prior to
PCR. Amplification of the first 527 bp of the 16S rRNA gene of the
bacteria was done using the MicroSeq 500 kit (PE Biosystems) in
accordance with the manufacturer's instructions with minor
modifications: 20 µl of DNA samples and 5 µl of 5% bovine serum
albumin (BSA; Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.) were used instead of 25 µl of
DNA samples. Briefly, 20 µl of undiluted or diluted extracted DNA was
mixed with 5 µl of 5% BSA (Sigma) and 25 µl of PCR master mixture,
which included a broad-range primer set (0005F and 0531R).
Amplifications were performed on a PE Biosystems GeneAmp 9600 thermal
cycler. A total of 25 cycles were performed, and each cycle consisted
of 30 s of melting at 95°C, 30 s of annealing at 60°C,
and 45 s of extension at 72°C. Prior to the first cycle, the
samples were heated to 95°C for 10 min, and the last cycle was
followed by a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. Each 10 µl of PCR
product was electrophoresed on an agarose gel (1.5% Nusieve [FMC,
Rockland, Maine] and 1.5% electrophoresis grade agarose [Bethesda
Research Laboratories, Gaithersburg, Md.]; a total of 3% agarose gel)
to determine the presence of the amplicon. A single band was visualized
with UV light by staining the gel with ethidium bromide (10 µg/ml) if the PCR was positive (15).
![]()
RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
TABLE 1.
Effect of 0.5% BSA on PCR amplification of 16S rDNA from
instrument true-positive blood culture samples
Comparison of bacteria identification by sequencing the 16S rDNA
with conventional phenotypic identification methods.
The results
for genotypic versus phenotypic identification for the 45 instrument
true-positive samples are shown in Table 2. Initial samples were chosen on a
random basis without an awareness of phenotypic identification.
Additional samples were selected after phenotypic identification to
assure a more diverse group of organisms. The samples included 13 species of gram-positive and 17 species of gram-negative aerobic
bacteria and 3 species of gram-positive and 4 species of gram-negative
anaerobic bacteria. There was 100% agreement for phenotypic and
genotypic identification methods for all 37 aerobic isolates to the
species or genus level. Results for six of eight (75%) anaerobic
isolates by both phenotypic and genotypic methods agreed to the species
or genus level. One isolate was identified as Porphyromonas
gingivalis by the phenotypic method but as Porphyromonas
macacae (salivosa) by the sequencing method. Another
isolate was identified as Peptostreptococcus prevotii by the
phenotypic method but as Ruminococcus
(Peptostreptococcus) productus (83.2% sequence
homology) or as Peptostreptococcus prevotii (80% sequence
homology) by the sequencing method.
|
Evaluation of the instrumental false-positive samples by acridine orange stain and 16S rDNA amplification. None of the 76 instrument false-positive samples showed evidence of any microorganisms by acridine orange stain. Furthermore, no PCR amplicon was produced for any of these samples using broad-range primers for the bacterial 16S rRNA gene.
Blood leukocyte counts and instrument detection time of blood
culture samples.
To investigate if high blood leukocyte counts
contribute to the false signaling of the BACTEC 9240 blood culture
system, we obtained peripheral leukocyte counts for patients for the
following numbers of samples: 73 of 76 instrument false-positive
specimens, 43 of 45 instrument true-positive specimens, and 20 of 20 instrument true-negative specimens (Table
3). Of the 73 patients with instrument false positives, 51 (70%) had higher-than-normal leukocyte counts (normal range, 3.5 × 109 to 10.5 × 109 leukocytes/liter). Of 43 positive-control patients and 20 negative-control patients, 18 (42%)
and 11 (55%), respectively, had higher-than-normal leukocyte counts.
Elevated leukocyte counts were statistically significantly more
frequently associated with the instrument false-positive samples than
with the two other groups of samples (P = 0.001).
|
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The development of continuously monitored blood culture instruments has led to a decrease in the detection time of bloodstream infections. However, specific identification of bacteria still requires conventional phenotypic methods. DNA probe assays have been developed for a limited number of pathogens that are frequently isolated from blood cultures (3, 13). For fastidious bacteria, subculture of the bacteria from blood culture bottles to solid media may require several days to weeks before phenotypic assays can provide an identification. These organisms are infrequently a cause of infection, and so immunologic or DNA probe assays have not been developed.
Recently, Turenne et al. (23) reported a rapid identification method for bacteria from blood cultures by using multiplex PCR amplification of the 16S rRNA gene and analysis of the amplified fragments using nondenaturing electrophoresis. Their method could not differentiate two important pathogens, Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae, from other bacteria of their respective genera presumably because of the limited resolution of macromolecular-gel-based separation techniques.
Previously, our group used the MicroSeq kit to amplify the first 418, 527, or 1,189 bp of the 16S rRNA gene for identification of 72 unusual aerobic gram-negative bacilli isolated from clinical specimens on solid culture media (21). We found that sequencing the first 527 bp of the 16S rRNA gene provided rapid, unambiguous identification of all 72 isolates to genus level and 97.9% of nonfermenting gram-negative bacteria and 84.0% of fermenting gram-negative bacteria to species level.
In the present study, the MicroSeq 500 method was applied directly to samples from blood culture bottles, which were signaled positive by the BACTEC 9240 blood culture system. The first 527 bp of the16S rRNA gene were analyzed. Results were obtained with the MicroSeq 500 method. Results for all 37 (100%) aerobic gram-positive and gram-negative isolates agreed with results obtained by conventional phenotypic methods to species or genus level (Table 2). The time required to complete the MicroSeq 500 analysis (DNA extraction, amplification, sequencing, and analysis of sequence data) was approximately 2 days.
Recently, it was demonstrated that the MicroSeq 500 kit was an accurate and rapid method for the identification of Mycobacterium species from isolated colonies (18). However, there has been no reported study on the analysis of anaerobic bacteria by these methods. Although the number of samples was small in the present study, the agreement between MicroSeq results and conventional phenotypic analyses for anaerobic bacteria was lower than for aerobic bacteria. This may be due to the need for more anaerobic representatives in the MicroSeq database, shortcomings in conventional identification techniques, or a combination of both factors. Few taxonomic or phylogenetic studies have addressed broad-range rDNA PCR as a method for anaerobic bacterial identification. Although the 23S rRNA gene is larger (approximately 2.5 kb, compared to 1.5 kb for the 16S rRNA gene) and may allow for more-complete identification of anaerobic bacteria (21), the 16S rRNA gene may well contain enough phylogenetically informational sites to perform well as a diagnostic target.
We, like other investigators, discovered that samples of blood culture specimens taken from the BACTEC Plus Aerobic/F bottle or BACTEC Anaerobic Lytic/10 bottle contained substantial PCR-inhibitory activity (11, 12). If DNA samples were not diluted before performing the PCR, an amplicon was obtained only 32% of the time. When the DNA samples were diluted to 1:1,000, an amplicon was obtained 79% of the time. Hemin in blood has been shown to inhibit PCR (8, 10, 17). Fredricks and Relman (6) demonstrated that sodium polyanetholesulfonate, a common additive to blood culture media was a potent PCR inhibitor.
Investigators have tried to use different methods to overcome the inhibitory effect of clinical specimens for PCR testing. Kulski and Pryce (12) determined that DNA extracted by alkali wash and heat lysis contained less inhibitory activity than that extracted by a sodium iodide-isopropanol method. Benzyl alcohol-guanidine hydrochloride organic DNA extraction can also overcome the PCR-inhibitory effect (6).
Several studies have shown that BSA can lessen PCR inhibition. Forbes and Hicks (4) reported that 0.05% BSA decreased the effects of PCR inhibition in 95% of their sputum samples. Kreader (10) found that inhibition from hemin and unknown inhibitors from feces and natural water samples was decreased 10- to 1,000-fold by BSA but that BSA could not relieve the interference from minimum inhibitory levels of a hemin degradation product, such as bilirubin. In the present study, blood culture samples taken from the BACTEC bottles contained not only hemin but also sodium polyanetholesulfonate and/or other unknown inhibitors. By supplementing the PCR mixture with 0.5% BSA and testing at both 1:10 and 1:100 dilutions of samples, the inhibitory effects on PCR were significantly reduced but not completely eliminated (Table 1).
The BACTEC 9240 blood culture system permits continuously monitoring specimens for growth of bacteria and fungi. We and others (2, 16, 20) have demonstrated that this system has a small but still significant instrument false-positive rate; a positive signal occurs, but both Gram stain and subculture of the specimen to solid (chocolate) media showed no organisms, and fungal cultures using the Isolator blood culture method from the same sample of blood showed no growth.
It has been suggested by the manufacturer that elevated peripheral leukocyte counts may contribute to the false signaling of the BACTEC 9240 blood culture system. In the present study, elevated leukocyte counts were statistically significantly associated with instrument false-positive samples compared to instrument true-positive and instrument true-negative samples (Table 3). We also found that instrument false-positive samples were signaled by the BACTEC system statistically significantly earlier than positive controls (Table 4).
Although elevated total peripheral leukocyte counts were more frequently associated with the instrument false-positive samples, 31% of these samples had normal or lower-than-normal peripheral leukocyte counts. Therefore, elevated leukocyte counts were not the only cause for the instrument false-positive signals for this group of samples. Theoretically, there might be unusual and/or fastidious bacteria including mycobacteria (although mycobacteria do not commonly grow in the BACTEC bottles studied) present in these instrument false-positive samples; however, in none of these 76 samples was a 16S rDNA amplicon generated. These samples also had negative acridine orange stains. Acridine orange stains nucleic acids of bacteria and thus is a more sensitive method than Gram stain. It is theoretically possible that lysis of some organisms (e.g., Streptococcus pneumoniae) may occur in blood culture systems to the extent that no bacteria are subsequently cultured. In such a scenario, the instrument may signal positive. Further studies are required to verify this possibility and might include frequent sampling of blood cultures for subculture, stains, antigen detection, and nucleic acid analysis.
In conclusion, the MicroSeq 500 PCR and sequencing kit is a reliable rapid method for detecting aerobic bacteria directly from blood culture bottles of the BACTEC 9240 blood culture system. Adding 0.5% BSA to the PCR mixture greatly diminished PCR inhibitors in these specimens. The BACTEC 9240 instrument false-positive samples appeared negative for bacterial 16S rDNA. Elevated peripheral leukocyte counts were statistically significantly more frequently associated with instrument false-positive samples.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Roberta Kondert for her efforts in preparing the manuscript, Jeffrey J. Germer and Mark J. Espy for technical advice and support, and the technologists in the bacteriology and mycology laboratories for their contributions to this evaluation.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Hilton 470B, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St., S.W., Rochester, MN 55905. Phone: (507) 284-2901. Fax: (507) 284-4272. E-mail: cockerill.franklin{at}mayo.edu
Present address: Department of Pathology, Yamins 309, Beth Israel
Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02215.
Present address: Departments of Medicine and Pathology,
Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232-2605.
§ Present address: Infectious Disease Research Institute/Corixa Corporation, Seattle, WA 98104.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Adal, K. A., and B. M. Farr. 1996. Central venous catheter-related infections: a review. Nutrition 12:208-213[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 2. | Cockerill, F. R., III, G. S. Reed, J. G. Hughes, C. A. Torgerson, E. A. Vetter, W. S. Harmsen, J. C. Dale, G. D. Roberts, D. M. Ilstrup, and N. K. Henry. 1997. Clinical comparison of BACTEC 9240 plus aerobic/F resin bottles and the isolator aerobic culture system for detection of bloodstream infections. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:1469-1472[Abstract]. |
| 3. |
Davis, T. E., and D. D. Fuller.
1991.
Direct identification of bacterial isolates in blood cultures by using a DNA probe.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
29:2193-2196 |
| 4. | Forbes, B. A., and K. E. Hicks. 1996. Substances interfering with direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical specimens by PCR: effects of bovine serum albumin. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:2125-2128[Abstract]. |
| 5. | Fredricks, D. N., and D. A. Relman. 1996. Sequence-based identification of microbial pathogens: a reconsideration of Koch's postulates. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 9:18-33[Abstract]. |
| 6. |
Fredricks, D. N., and D. A. Relman.
1998.
Improved amplification of microbial DNA from blood cultures by removal of the PCR inhibitor sodium polyanetholesulfonate.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
36:2810-2816 |
| 7. |
Greisen, K.,
M. Loeffelholz,
A. Purogit, and D. Leong.
1994.
PCR primers and probes for the 16S rRNA gene of most species of pathogenic bacteria, including bacteria found in cerebrospinal fluid.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
32:335-351 |
| 8. | Higuchi, R. 1989. Simple and rapid preparation of samples for PCR, p. 31-38. In H. A. Erlich (ed.), PCR technology: principles and applications for DNA amplification. Stockton Press, New York, N.Y. |
| 9. | Kolbert, C. P., and D. H. Persing. 1999. Ribosomal DNA sequencing as a tool for identification of bacterial pathogens. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2:299-305[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 10. | Kreader, C. A. 1996. Relief of amplification inhibition in PCR with bovine serum albumin or T4 gene 32 protein. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62:1102-1106[Abstract]. |
| 11. | Kulski, J. K., C. Khinsoe, T. Pryce, and K. Christiansen. 1995. Use of a multiplex PCR to detect and identify Mycobacterium avium and M. intracellulare in blood culture fluids of AIDS patients. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:668-674[Abstract]. |
| 12. | Kulski, J. K., and T. Pryce. 1996. Preparation of mycobacterial DNA from blood culture fluids by simple alkali wash and heat lysis method for PCR detection. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:1985-1991[Abstract]. |
| 13. |
Kuritza, A. P.,
C. E. Getty,
P. Shaughnessy,
R. Hesse, and A. A. Salyers.
1986.
DNA probe for identification of clinically important bacteroides species.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
23:343-349 |
| 14. | Make, D. G. 1981. Nosocomial bacteremia: an epidemiologic overview. Am. J. Med. 70:719-732[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 15. |
Mendez, J. C.,
M. J. Espy,
T. F. Smith,
J. A. Wilson, and C. V. Paya.
1998.
Evaluation of PCR primers for early diagnosis of cytomegalovirus infection following liver transplantation.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
36:526-530 |
| 16. |
Nolte, F. S.,
J. M. Williams,
R. C. Jerris,
J. A. Morello,
C. D. Leitch,
S. Matushek,
L. D. Schwabe,
F. Dorigan, and F. E. Kocka.
1993.
Multicenter clinical evaluation of a continuous monitoring blood culture system using fluorescent-sensor technology (BACTEC 9240).
J. Clin. Microbiol.
31:552-557 |
| 17. |
Panaccio, M., and A. Lew.
1991.
PCR in the presence of 8% (v/v) blood.
Nucleic Acids Res.
19:1151-1156 |
| 18. |
Patel, J. B.,
D. G. B. Leonard,
X. Pan,
J. M. Musser,
R. E. Berman, and I. Nachamkin.
2000.
Sequence-based identification of Mycobacterium species using MicroSeq 500 16S rDNA bacterial identification system.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
38:246-251 |
| 19. | Salzman, M. B., and L. G. Rubin. 1995. Intravenous catheter-related infections. Adv. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. 10:337-368[Medline]. |
| 20. | Shigei, J. T., J. A. Shimabukuro, M. T. L. Pezzlo, M. de la Maza, and E. M. Peterson. 1995. Value of terminal subcultures for blood cultures monitored by BACTEC 9240. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:1385-1388[Abstract]. |
| 21. |
Tang, Y.,
N. M. Ellis,
M. K. Hopkins,
D. H. Smith,
D. E. Dodge, and D. H. Persing.
1998.
Comparison of phenotypic and genotypic techniques for identification of unusual aerobic pathogenic Gram-negative bacilli.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
36:3674-3679 |
| 22. | Temesgen, Z., D. R. Toal, and F. R. Cockerill, III. 1997. Leclercia adecarboxylata infections: case report and review. Clin. Infect. Dis. 25:79-81[Medline]. |
| 23. |
Turenne, C. Y.,
E. Witwicki,
D. J. Hoban,
J. A. Karlowsky, and A. M. Kabani.
2000.
Rapid identification of bacteria from positive blood cultures by fluorescence-based PCR-single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis of the 16S rRNA gene.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
38:513-520 |
| 24. | Washington, J. A. 1985. Laboratory procedures in clinical microbiology, 2nd ed. Springer-Verlag, New York, N.Y. |
| 25. |
Weisburg, W. G.,
S. M. Barns,
D. A. Pelletier, and D. J. Lane.
1991.
16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study.
J. Bacteriol.
173:697-703 |
| 26. | Wenzel, R. P., M. R. Pinsky, R. J. Ulevitch, and L. Young. 1996. Current understanding of sepsis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 22:407-413[Medline]. |
| 27. |
Wenzel, R. P.
1992.
Anti-endotoxin monoclonal antibodies a second look.
N. Engl. J. Med.
326:1151-1153[Medline].
|
| 28. |
Woese, C. R.
1987.
Bacterial evolution.
Microbiol. Rev.
51:221-271 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. |
|---|---|
| Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |
|---|