This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zheng, X.
Right arrow Articles by Reppun, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zheng, X.
Right arrow Articles by Reppun, T.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, October 2001, p. 3718-3720, Vol. 39, No. 10
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.10.3718-3720.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Rapid Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Contaminated BACTEC 12B Broth Cultures by Testing with Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct Test

Xiaotian Zheng,1,2,* Minnie Pang,1 Howard D. Engler,3 Sherri Tanaka,1 and Thomas Reppun1,2

Diagnostic Laboratory Services, The Queen's Health Systems,1 and University of Hawaii School of Medicine,2 Honolulu, Hawaii, and Focus Technologies, Inc., Cypress, California3

Received 30 April 2001/Returned for modification 13 June 2001/Accepted 26 July 2001


    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

Contamination of broth cultures of acid-fast bacilli (AFB) by bacterial species other than Mycobacterium species frequently occurs. Many of these contaminated cultures require redecontamination and reincubation before the appropriate tests can be performed for identification, significantly affecting the turnaround time for reporting culture results. In this study, the Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct Test (MTD; Gen-Probe) was performed to detect the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) in 125 BACTEC 12B broth cultures with positive growth indices. Among these, 41 grew non-AFB bacteria only, and all 41 were negative by the MTD. The remaining 84 bottles contained contaminated cultures that grew both AFB and other bacteria or yeasts. Repeat decontamination and reincubation of these specimens required a mean time of 13 days (range, 3 to 40 days). The MTD results were positive for 10 samples, 9 of which were MTBC culture positive and 1 of which grew Myobacterium celatum, a species known to cross-react in the MTD. All cultures growing other mycobacterial species were negative by the MTD. The results of this study demonstrate that the MTD is both sensitive and specific in detecting MTBC in contaminated broth cultures and that, when used selectively, the MTD can potentially rule in or out a diagnosis of MTBC as much as 12 days earlier than using nonamplified DNA probe testing alone can.


    TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

Tuberculosis remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Rapid and accurate detection of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) is a key aspect of effective tuberculosis treatment and control. Although the recently introduced nucleic acid amplification tests provide an opportunity for the early diagnosis of disease, routine culture of acid-fast bacilli (AFB) is still necessary for its higher sensitivity and ability to identify mycobacterial species other than MTBC and for the recovery of isolates for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. For the majority of specimens for AFB culture, modern culture techniques make it possible to meet the 21-day target turnaround time for detection and identification of MTBC as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (22). However, despite standardized techniques for decontamination and concentration and for the addition of antibiotics, contamination of broth cultures by bacteria other than AFB still occurs in 2 to greater than 10% of cultures (8, 14, 15, 18, 23, 24, 26). Many of these contaminated cultures grow AFB as well as other contaminating organisms, thus requiring a redecontamination step and reincubation before the appropriate tests (such as chromatographic or biochemical methods) can be performed for organism identification. The turnaround time for reporting culture results is thus significantly affected in this group of cultures. Although the use of DNA probes for detection and identification may be helpful in some of these contaminated cultures, such use is not specified in the manufacturer's instructions or discussed in published literature. Furthermore, since both the AFB and the contaminating bacteria in the bottle contribute to the growth index, it is difficult to estimate if and ensure that there is a sufficient amount of AFB for DNA probe testing. The enhanced Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct Test (MTD; Gen-Probe Inc., San Diego, Calif.) utilizes transcription-mediated amplification to detect MTBC rRNA and has been approved for detection of MTBC directly in respiratory specimens. The performance of the MTD directly on specimens has been extensively evaluated and reported (3, 5, 7, 9, 19, 27; X. Zheng, M. Pang, R. Watase, E. Ayling, K. Hirata, and T. Reppun, Abstr. 100th Gen. Meet. Am. Soc. Microbiol., abstr. C-3, p. 126, 2000). Studies have also found that the MTD (1, 2) and other nucleic acid amplification tests (11, 16, 17, 20, 25) can be used for early detection of MTBC in AFB broth cultures. However, the use of the MTD on contaminated broths has not been reported. In the present study, the MTD was performed to detect MTBC in 125 contaminated BACTEC 12B broth cultures to investigate if the MTD can shorten the time to MTBC identification in these types of cultures.

Specimen processing and organism identification. A total of 2,450 respiratory specimens were processed. Specimen processing, culture, sample redecontamination, and DNA probe testing and the MTD were performed at the Microbiology Laboratory, Diagnostic Laboratory Services, The Queen's Health Systems, Honolulu, Hawaii. Mycobacterial species other than MTBC and Myobacterium avium-Mycobacterium intracellulare complex were identified in the reference laboratory of Focus Technologies using a combination of high-performance liquid chromatography and conventional biochemical tests. Each specimen was mixed with Mucosol (Alpha-Tec Systems, Inc., Vancouver, Wash.) in a 1:1 ratio and left to stand for 15 min at room temperature. Specimens were then centrifuged at 3,000 × g for 20 min, and an equal volume of sodium hydroxide was added to the sediment to make a final 2% concentration of sodium hydroxide. After 15 min, phosphate buffer was added and specimens were concentrated as described above. The sediment was used to prepare a smear for staining with auramine-rhodamine and to inoculate a BACTEC 12B bottle (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, Md) and Middlebrook 7H10 solid medium. Cultures were incubated for 6 weeks. BACTEC 12B bottles were monitored for growth using the BACTEC 460TB instrument according to the manufacturer's instructions. Growth indices (GI) were measured twice a week for the first 2 weeks and once a week for the next 4 weeks. When the GI reached >10, the bottle was read daily until the GI was >= 100. Aliquots of broth were aseptically removed for (i) smears stained by the carbol-fuchsin method, (ii) identification by DNA probe testing or other methods, and (iii) inoculation of a 5% sheep blood agar plate for purity checks. Isolates of MTBC and M. avium complex were identified by nucleic acid hybridization using DNA probes (AccuProbe; Gen-Probe Inc.).

Redecontamination and enhanced MTD. The contaminated broth cultures were those in 12B bottles with elevated GI values containing non-AFB bacteria that grow on a sheep blood agar plate or are present on the smear, with or without the growth of AFB in the culture. To redecontaminate, contaminated broths were treated with sodium hydroxide (2.5% final concentration) and centrifuged. An aliquot of broth (0.5 ml) was removed before redecontamination for testing by the MTD. The MTD was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions (MTD product insert, Gen-Probe Inc.).

Comparison of MTD and culture results. At the microbiology laboratory of Diagnostic Laboratory Services, The Queen's Health Systems, the overall broth culture contamination rate is 5%. Contaminating organisms include gram-positive cocci in clusters (33%), coryneforms (27%), gram-negative rods (13%), and mixed organism types and yeasts (27%). A total of 125 broth samples contaminated with bacteria or yeasts (from 115 patients) were collected for testing by the MTD. Among these, 41 samples grew non-AFB contaminating bacteria only and were negative by the MTD. The remaining 84 contaminated cultures grew AFB as well as contaminating organisms. Redecontamination of these specimens required a mean time of 13 days (range, 3 to 40 days from the time the broth culture grew AFB to the time MTBC probe results were available). AFB and organisms recovered from the 84 contaminated cultures included 9 MTBC, 34 M. avium-M. intracellulare complex, 17 Mycobacterium chelonae species group, 17 Mycobacterium fortuitum species group, 4 Mycobacterium gordonae, 1 Mycobacterium scrofulaceum, 1 Mycobacterium celatum, 1 Nocardia asteroides complex (the complex includes N. asteroides sensu stricto, Nocardia farcinica, and Nocardia nova), and 1 Tsukamurella species. The MTD results for these broth specimens were positive for 10 samples, 9 of which were MTBC culture positive and 1 of which grew M. celatum, a species known to cross-react in the MTD (21; MTD product insert, Gen-Probe Inc.). All cultures growing other mycobacterial species were negative by the MTD (Table 1). These results demonstrate that the presence of contaminating organisms did not interfere with MTBC detection in broth cultures by the MTD.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1.   Comparison of MTD results with that of final identification of MTBC by culture

The MTD has been reported to cross-react with Mycobacterium terrae-like organisms and M. celatum type 1 (21; MTD product insert, Gen-Probe Inc.). M. celatum, rarely seen in clinical specimens, has recently been found to be an important pathogen in both immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients (4, 21). Somoskövi et al. reported that performing the MTBC AccuProbe test with a selection temperature between 60 and 61°C, rather than 60 ± 1°C, helped to differentiate M. celatum from MTBC (21). Additionally, attention should be paid to colonial morphology and care should be taken to routinely include this organism as a negative control. The M. celatum isolate described in this report was identified using high-performance liquid chromatography and was not further typed.

Information regarding the interference of normal respiratory flora with the MTD is very limited in the published literature. According to the manufacturer's data, the MTD can detect MTBC rRNA at a concentration equivalent to 5 CFU per test and does not react with 150 species of microorganisms (including respiratory flora) at the level of 5 × 107 organisms per reaction (MTD product insert, Gen-Probe Inc.). In a study of the analytical sensitivity and specificity of the assay, the MTD was performed on 54 Mycobacterium species and on 124 species of bacteria and yeasts, including those frequently found in respiratory specimens (12). All non-MTBC species were negative by the MTD. One report suggests that Mycobacterium kansasii and M. avium may sometimes cause low-level positive MTD results (13). More recently, Desmond and Loretz reported using the MTD to detect MTBC in BACTEC 12B broth cultures from 239 smear-positive specimens (10). Of only two specimens from previous MTBC culture-positive patients that were now MTD positive but culture negative, one was found to be overgrown with nonmycobacterial contaminants and most likely contained MTBC and the second grew a non-MTBC mycobacterial species (NCP 201) that may have either grown over the MTBC in the specimen or cross-reacted with the MTBC probe used in the MTD procedure. All positive results were obtained only with the tuberculosis patients in the study (10). Overall, the specificity of the test as reported is very high, at over 99% in most studies (1-3, 5, 7; Zheng et al., Abstr. 100th Gen. Meet. Am. Soc. Microbiol.).

Although the MTD does not replace the AFB smear and culture, it can enhance rapid establishment of a diagnosis when used directly on clinical specimens (5, 6). However, for various reasons (ie., degree of suspicion, physician preference, and cost), most requests regarding specimens received in the laboratory are for AFB smear and culture only.

The AFB broth culture contamination rates differ among laboratories and depend on factors such as specimen handling, specimen delivery time, processing method, and culture medium used (8, 14, 15, 18, 23, 24, 26). To further identify an organism present in the broth, redecontamination and reincubation (sometimes more than once) are usually required to eliminate non-AFB organisms present in the broth. In our study, this process took an average of an extra 13 days before an identification test could be performed. This time requirement can significantly decrease a laboratory's ability to meet the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-recommended 21-day target turnaround time for detection and identification of MTBC. Data from the present study have shown that utilization of the MTD on these contaminated 12B broths improved the turnaround time required to rule in or out a laboratory diagnosis of MTBC infection. The more rapid test results may be especially helpful in the medical management of hospitalized patients.

In summary, the results of this study demonstrate that the MTD is both a sensitive and specific method of detecting MTBC in contaminated BACTEC 12B broth cultures. Although redecontamination is still required for recovery of an isolate for subsequent antimicrobial susceptibility testing, MTBC can potentially be ruled in or out as much as 12 days earlier by the MTD than by using nonamplified DNA probe testing alone.


    FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Diagnostic Laboratory Services, The Queen's Health Systems, 650 Iwilei Rd., Suite 300, Honolulu, HI 96817. Phone: (808) 589-5100. Fax: (808) 593-8357. E-mail: xzheng{at}dls.queens.org.


    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Text
References

1. Bergmann, J. S., and G. L. Woods. 1999. Enhanced Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct Test for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in positive BACTEC 12B broth cultures of respiratory specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:2099-2101[Abstract/Free Full Text].
2. Bergmann, J. S., and G. L. Woods. 1999. Enhanced Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct Test for detection of M. tuberculosis complex in positive ESP II broth cultures of nonrespiratory specimens. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 35:245-248[CrossRef][Medline].
3. Bergmann, J. S., G. Yuoh, G. Fish, and G. L. Woods. 1999. Clinical evaluation of the enhanced Gen-Probe Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct Test for rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis in prison inmates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:1419-1425[Abstract/Free Full Text].
4. Bux-Gewehr, I., H. P. Hagen, S. Rüsch-Gerdes, and G. E. Feurle. 1998. Fatal pulmonary infection with Mycobacterium celatum in an apparently immunocompetent patient. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:587-588[Abstract/Free Full Text].
5. Catanzaro, A., S. Perry, J. E. Clarridge, S. Dunbar, S. Goodnight-White, P. A. Lo-Bue, C. Peter, G. E. Pfyffer, M. F. Sierra, R. Weber, G. Woods, G. Mathews, V. Jonas, K. Smith, and P. Della-Latta. 2000. The role of clinical suspicion in evaluating a new diagnostic test for active tuberculosis. JAMA 283:639-645[Abstract/Free Full Text].
6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2000. Update: nucleic acid amplification tests for tuberculosis. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 49:593-594[Medline].
7. Chedore, P., and F. B. Jamieson. 1999. Routine use of the Gen-Probe MTD2 amplification test for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical specimens in a large public health mycobacteriology laboratory. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 35:185-191[CrossRef][Medline].
8. Cornfield, D. B., K. G. Beavis, J. A. Greene, M. Bojak, and J. Bondi. 1997. Mycobacterial growth and bacterial contamination in the Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube and BACTEC 460 culture systems. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:2068-2071[Abstract].
9. Della-Latta, P., and S. Whittier. 1998. Comprehensive evaluation of performance, laboratory application, and clinical usefulness of two direct amplification technologies for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. In Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 110:301-310.
10. Desmond, E. P., and K. Loretz. 2001. Use of the Gen-Probe Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct Test for early detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in BACTEC 12B medium. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:1993-1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].
11. Hernandez, A., J. S. Bergmann, and G. L. Woods. 1997. AMPLICOR MTB polymerase chain reaction test for identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in positive ESP II broth cultures. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 27:17-20[CrossRef][Medline].
12. Jonas, V., M. J. Alden, J. I. Curry, K. Kamisango, C. A. Knott, R. Lankford, J. M. Wolfe, and D. F. Moore. 1993. Detection and identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis directly from sputum sediments by amplification of rRNA. J. Clin. Microbiol. 31:2410-2416[Abstract/Free Full Text].
13. Jorgensen, J. H., J. R. Salinas, R. Paxson, K. Magnon, J. E. Patterson, and T. F. Patterson. 1999. False-positive Gen-Probe Direct Mycobacterium tuberculosis amplification test results for patients with pulmonary M. kansasii and M. avium infections. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:175-178[Abstract/Free Full Text].
14. Kanchana, M. V., D. Cheke, I. Natyshak, B. Connor, A. Warner, and T. Martin. 2000. Evaluation of the BACTEC MGIT 960 system for the recovery of mycobacteria. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 37:31-36[CrossRef][Medline].
15. Katila, M.-L., P. Katila, and R. Erkinjuntti-Pekkanen. 2000. Accelerated detection and identification of mycobacteria with MGIT 960 and COBAS AMPLICOR systems. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:960-964[Abstract/Free Full Text].
16. Ninet, B., P. Rohner, C. Metral, and R. Auckenthaler. 1999. Assessment of use of the COBAS AMPLICOR System with BACTEC 12B cultures for rapid detection of frequently identified mycobacteria. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:782-784[Abstract/Free Full Text].
17. Pfyffer, G. E., C. Cieslak, H.-M. Welscher, P. Kissling, and S. Rüsch-Gerdes. 1997. Rapid detection of mycobacteria in clinical specimens by using the automated BACTEC 9000 MB system and comparison with radiometric and solid-culture systems. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:2229-2234[Abstract].
18. Pfyffer, G. E., H.-M. Welscher, P. Kissling, C. Cieslak, M. J. Casal, J. Gutierrez, and S. Rüsch-Gerdes. 1997. Comparison of the Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) with radiometric and solid culture for recovery of acid-fast bacilli. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:364-368[Abstract].
19. Scarparo, C., P. Piccoli, A. Rigon, G. Ruggiero, M. Scagnelli, and C. Piersimoni. 2000. Comparison of enhanced Mycobacterium tuberculosis Amplified Direct Test with COBAS AMPLICOR Mycobacterium tuberculosis Assay for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in respiratory and extrapulmonary specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:1559-1562[Abstract/Free Full Text].
20. Smith, M. B., J. S. Bergmann, and G. L. Woods. 1997. Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in BACTEC 12B broth cultures by the Roche Amplicor PCR Assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:900-902[Abstract].
21. Somoskövi, A., J. E. Hotaling, M. Fitzgerald, V. Jonas, D. Stasik, L. M. Parsons, and M. Salfinger. 2000. False-positive results for Mycobacterium celatum with the AccuProbe Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:2743-2745[Abstract/Free Full Text].
22. Tenover, F. C., J. T. Crawford, R. E. Huebner, L. J. Geiter, C. R. Horsburgh, Jr., and R. C. Good. 1993. The resurgence of tuberculosis: is your laboratory ready? J. Clin. Microbiol. 31:767-770[Free Full Text].
23. Tortoli, E., P. Cichero, M. G. Chirillo, M. R. Gismondo, L. Bono, G. Gesu, M. T. Simonetti, G. Volpe, G. Nardi, and P. Marone. 1998. Multicenter comparison of ESP Culture System II with BACTEC 460TB and with Lowenstein-Jensen medium for recovery of mycobacteria from different clinical specimens, including blood. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:1378-1381[Abstract/Free Full Text].
24. Tortoli, E., P. Cichero, C. Piersimoni, M. T. Simonetti, G. Gesu, and D. Nista. 1999. Use of BACTEC MGIT 960 for recovery of mycobacteria from clinical specimens: multicenter study. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:3578-3582[Abstract/Free Full Text].
25. Tortoli, E., F. Lavinia, and M. T. Simonetti. 1998. Early detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in BACTEC cultures by ligase chain reaction. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:2791-2792[Abstract/Free Full Text].
26. Zanetti, S., F. Ardito, L. Sechi, M. Sanguinetti, P. Molicotti, G. Delogu, M. P. Pinna, A. Nacci, and G. Fadda. 1997. Evaluation of a nonradiometric system (BACTEC 9000 MB) for detection of mycobacteria in human clinical samples. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:2072-2075[Abstract].
27. Zheng, X., and G. D. Roberts. 1999. Diagnosis and susceptibility testing, p. 57-64. In D. Schlossberg (ed.), Tuberculosis and nontuberculosis mycobacterial infections. W. B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, Pa.

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, October 2001, p. 3718-3720, Vol. 39, No. 10
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.10.3718-3720.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.


This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Lima, D. M., Bollela, V. R., Jacomo, B. J. T., Martinez, R., Lopes da Fonseca, B. A. (2005). Identification of Mycobacterium Species in Contaminated Cultures by Polymerase Chain Reaction. Chest 127: 1283-1288 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zheng, X.
Right arrow Articles by Reppun, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zheng, X.
Right arrow Articles by Reppun, T.

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»