This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martinez, F.
Right arrow Articles by Woods, G. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Martinez, F.
Right arrow Articles by Woods, G. L.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, October 2001, p. 3733-3735, Vol. 39, No. 10
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.10.3733-3735.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Evaluation of the Vitek Card GPS105 and VTK-RO7.01 Software for Detection of Oxacillin Resistance in Clinically Relevant Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci

Fernando Martinez, Laura J. Chandler,* Barbara S. Reisner, and Gail L. Woods

Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas 77555-0740

Received 28 March 2001/Returned for modification 16 May 2001/Accepted 11 July 2001


    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

The performance of Vitek cards GPS105 with software version VTK-R07.01 for detection of oxacillin resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) was compared to disk diffusion and PCR detection for mecA. The sensitivity and specificity of the Vitek GPS105 method were 97.6 and 85.5%, respectively.


    TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) are important causes of nosocomial bacteremia, especially in patients with intravenous catheters or indwelling medical devices (1, 3, 7, 14). In some institutions, 70 to 75% of CoNS are resistant to oxacillin; consequently, vancomycin is the therapy of choice. If the isolate is oxacillin susceptible, treatment with a penicillinase-resistant penicillin is preferred to minimize selection of vancomycin-resistant organisms. A susceptibility test method that provides accurate oxacillin results is critical.

The National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) changed the breakpoints for oxacillin testing of CoNS in January 1999, because of discrepancies between results of mecA genetic assays, which are considered the reference method for detecting oxacillin resistance in staphylococci, and the former NCCLS breakpoints of >= 4 µg/ml for resistance and <= 2 µg/ml for susceptibility. Currently, for microtiter dilution and disk diffusion testing, respectively, CoNS isolates with an MIC of >= 0.5 µg/ml or a zone diameter of <= 17 mm are considered resistant, and those with an MIC of <= 0.25 µg/ml or a zone diameter of >= 18 mm are considered susceptible (9). To comply with these guidelines, it was necessary for laboratories using the Vitek (bioMerieux Vitek, Inc.) to use an alternate method when testing CoNS. Vitek updated its software and increased the number of oxacillin concentrations tested to accommodate the revised oxacillin breakpoints for CoNS in September 1999. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the performance of the Vitek card GPS105 with software version VTK-R07.01. The results were compared to disk diffusion and detection of the mecA gene by PCR.

Isolates of CoNS (n = 202) from cultures of clinical specimens of blood and urine were collected prospectively and stored at -70°C. Prior to testing, isolates were subcultured twice on sheep blood agar. Isolates were identified as CoNS using Gram stain, catalase, and latex agglutination tests (Staphaurex; Murex Biotech Ltd., Dartford, England). CoNS were identified to species with the API Staph-Ident system (bioMerieux Vitek, Inc.). Disk diffusion testing was performed according to NCCLS guidelines (10) by using Mueller-Hinton agar without additional NaCl (BD Biosciences, Sparks, Md.) and 1-µg oxacillin disks (BD Biosciences). Zone diameters were measured after plates were incubated in ambient air at 35°C for 24 h. Vitek cards GPS105 were inoculated and incubated according to manufacturer's recommendations. Results were interpreted by Vitek software version VTK-R07.01. If disk diffusion and Vitek results disagreed, both tests were repeated. Multiplex PCR for detection of the mecA gene and the Staphylococcus IS431 sequence was performed as previously described (13); if isolates did not contain the mecA gene or an IS431 sequence, amplification of the Staphylococcus 16S rRNA sequence was performed as described previously (6).

The 202 CoNS isolates tested (141 from urine, 61 from blood) in this study belonged to 11 species (Table 1). The mecA gene was detected in 126 isolates (62.4%), of five species: Staphylococcus epidermidis, S. haemolyticus, S. hominis, S. warneri, and S. xylosus. S. capitis, S. cohnii, S. lugdunensis, S. saprophyticus, S. sciuri, and S. simulans were consistently mecA negative.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1.   Vitek and disk diffusion oxacillin results after initial testing

Initial Vitek and disk diffusion results are summarized by source in Table 1. The majority of the CoNS from blood were S. epidermidis. The mecA gene was detected in 44 (72%) of all blood isolates; all were determined to be oxacillin resistant by both disk diffusion and Vitek. All 115 mecA-negative isolates were determined to be susceptible by Vitek and disk diffusion (sensitivity and specificity of 100%).

Of the urine isolates (n = 141), 80 were mecA positive and 61 were mecA negative. Both Vitek and disk diffusion methods did not perform as well on isolates of CoNS from urine: 6 of the mecA positive isolates were determined to be susceptible by Vitek, and 11 of the mecA negative isolates were determined to be resistant (sensitivity, 92.5%; specificity, 82%). The 11 isolates that were mecA negative but oxacillin resistant as determined by Vitek and disk diffusion included six S. saprophyticus isolates, two S. lugdunensis isolates, and one isolate each of S. capitis, S. cohnii, and S. sciuri. Three species (S. epidermidis, S. hominis, and S. haemolyticus) comprised the majority of the isolates (122 of 141; 86.5%). For these three species, the sensitivity and specificity of Vitek were high (92.4 and 97.6%, respectively). After repeat testing, Vitek correctly identified 76 of the 79 mecA-positive isolates as resistant and 100% of the mecA-negative isolates as susceptible (sensitivity, 96.2; specificity, 100%).

Discrepancies between results of mecA PCR assays when CoNS are tested and the NCCLS microtiter dilution and disk diffusion breakpoints for oxacillin against S. aureus have been recognized for several years. For this reason, various investigators recommended lowering the oxacillin MIC breakpoint for CoNS: York et al. (15) suggested <= 1 µg/ml for susceptibility, Cormican et al. (2) and McDonald et al. (8) suggested <= 0.5 µg/ml, and Marshall et al. (7) suggested <= 0.25 µg/ml.

Tenover et al. (12) concurred with the breakpoints of <= 0.25 µg/ml for susceptibility and >= 0.5 µg/ml for resistance because these values allowed maximum sensitivity for detecting mecA-positive isolates of S. epidermidis without drastically compromising specificity. These authors acknowledged, however, that these breakpoints were considerably less specific for mecA in species of CoNS other than S. epidermidis. Tenover et al. (12) also suggested modified breakpoints for disk diffusion: <= 17 mm for resistance and >= 18 mm for susceptibility. The NCCLS considered data from all studies and adopted the oxacillin MIC and disk diffusion breakpoints for CoNS advocated by Tenover et al. Our results show that the new Vitek revised cards and software system accurately predicts the presence or absence of mecA in the three most commonly encountered species of CoNS.

For species of CoNS other than S. epidermidis, S. hominis, and S. haemolyticus, we found poor correlation between mecA PCR and oxacillin testing by Vitek or disk diffusion. In particular, isolates of S. capitis, S. cohnii, S. lugdunensis, S. saprophyticus, and S. sciuri that had an oxacillin MIC of 0.5 µg/ml as determined by Vitek (and were resistant by disk diffusion) were consistently mecA negative. Similar findings have been reported by other investigators (4, 5, 12). Hussain et al. (4) tested 493 isolates of 11 species of CoNS (no S. scuiri) and found mecA-negative isolates of S. capitis, S. cohnii, S. lugdunensis, and S. saprophyticus with oxacillin MICs of 0.5 to 2.0 µg/ml by agar dilution. In a second study, Hussain et al. (5) tested 463 isolates of 13 species of CoNS (no S. scuiri) and found mecA-negative S. capitis, S. cohnii, S. lugdunensis, S. saprophyticus, S. caprae, S. warneri, and S. xylosus with oxacillin MICs of >= 0.5 µg/ml. In the latter study, isolates were tested by a latex agglutination test that detects penicillin-binding protein (PBP) 2a. Compared to mecA PCR, the sensitivity of that latex test was 100% and the specificity was 99.5%, whereas the specificity of the new NCCLS breakpoint was 60.8%. The mechanism(s) of decreased susceptibility to oxacillin in mecA-negative CoNS with an oxacillin MIC of 0.5 to 2.0 µg/ml is unknown, but alterations in PBPs other than PBP2a have been documented in some strains of S. haemolyticus and S. saprophyticus (11) and, therefore, suggested as one possibility (12). It is not known whether penicillinase-resistant penicillins can eradicate clinical isolates of mecA-negative CoNS with an oxacillin MIC of 0.5 to 2.0 µg/ml. Clinical trials designed to answer this question are needed.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Promega Corporation (Madison, Wis.) for providing the PCR reagents used in this study. BioMerieux kindly provided the API Staph Identification kits.


    FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: 5.114 McCullough Building, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Blvd., Galveston, TX 77555-0740. Phone: (409) 747-1424. Fax: (409) 772-5683. E-mail: lchandle{at}utmb.edu.


    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Text
References

1. Cockerill, F. R., III, J. G. Hughes, E. A. Vetter, R. A. Meuller, A. L. Weaver, D. M. Ilstrup, J. E. Rosenblatt, and W. R. Wilson. 1997. Analysis of 281,797 consecutive blood cultures performed over an eight-year period: trends in microorganisms isolated and the value of anaerobic culture of blood. Clin. Infect. Dis. 24:403-418[Medline].
2. Cormican, M. G., W. W. Wile, M. S. Barrett, M. A. Pfaller, and R. N. Jones. 1996. Phenotypic detection of mecA-positive staphylococcal blood stream isolates: high accuracy of simple disk diffusion tests. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 25:107-112[CrossRef][Medline].
3. Emori, T. G., and R. P. Gaynes. 1993. An overview of nosocomial infections, including the role of the microbiology laboratory. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 6:428-442[Abstract/Free Full Text].
4. Hussain, Z., L. Stoakes, V. Massey, D. Diagre, V. Fitzgerald, S. El Sayed, and R. Lannigan. 2000. Correlation of oxacillin MIC with mecA gene carriage in coagulase-negative staphylococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:752-754[Abstract/Free Full Text].
5. Hussain, Z., L. Stoakes, S. Garrow, S. Longo, V. Fitzgerald, S. El Sayed, and R. Lannigan. 2000. Rapid detection of mecA-positive and mecA-negative coagulase-negative staphylococci by an anti-penicillin binding protein 2a slide latex agglutination test. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:2051-2054[Abstract/Free Full Text].
6. Jaffe, R. I., J. D. Lane, S. V. Albury, and D. M. Niemeyer. 2000. Rapid extraction from and direct identification in clinical samples of methicillin-resistant staphylococci using the PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:3407-3412[Abstract/Free Full Text].
7. Marshall, S. A., W. W. Wilke, M. A. Pfaller, and R. N. Jones. 1998. Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci from blood stream infections: frequency of occurrence, antimicrobial susceptibility, and molecular (mecA) characterization of oxacillin resistance in the SCOPE Program. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 30:205-214[CrossRef][Medline].
8. McDonald, C. L., W. E. Maher, and R. J. Fass. 1995. Revised interpretation of oxacillin MICs for Staphylococcus epidermidis based on mecA detection. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 39:982-984[Abstract].
9. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2001. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, 11th information supplement: M100-211, vol. 21. , no. 1. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
10. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2000. Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests, 7th ed. Approved Standard M2-A7. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
11. Suzuki, E., K. Hiramatsu, and T. Yokota. 1992. Survey of methicillin-resistant clinical strains of coagulase-negative staphylococci for mecA gene distribution. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 36:429-434[Abstract/Free Full Text].
12. Tenover, F. C., R. N. Jones, J. M. Swenson, B. Zimmer, S. McAllister, and J. H. Jorgensen for the NCCLS Staphylococcal Working Group. 1999. Methods for improved detection of oxacillin resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci: results of a multicenter study. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:4051-4058[Abstract/Free Full Text].
13. Vannuffel, P., J. Gigi, H. Ezzedine, B. Vandercam, M. Delmee, G. Wauters, and J. L. Gala. 1995. Specific detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus species by multiplex PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:2864-2867[Abstract].
14. Weinstein, M. P., M. L. Towns, S. M. Quartey, S. Mirrett, L. G. Reimer, G. Parmigiani, and L. B. Reller. 1997. The clinical significance of positive blood cultures in the 1990s: a prospective comprehensive evaluation of the microbiology, epidemiology, and outcome of bacteremia and fungemia in adults. Clin. Infect. Dis. 24:584-602[Medline].
15. York, M. K., L. Gibbs, F. Chehab, and G. F. Brooks. 1996. Comparison of PCR detection of mecA with standard susceptibility testing methods to determine methicillin resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:249-253[Abstract].


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, October 2001, p. 3733-3735, Vol. 39, No. 10
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.10.3733-3735.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Horstkotte, M. A., Knobloch, J. K.-M., Rohde, H., Dobinsky, S., Mack, D. (2004). Evaluation of the BD PHOENIX Automated Microbiology System for Detection of Methicillin Resistance in Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 5041-5046 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Horstkotte, M. A., Knobloch, J. K.-M., Rohde, H., Dobinsky, S., Mack, D. (2002). Rapid Detection of Methicillin Resistance in Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci with the VITEK 2 System. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 3291-3295 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martinez, F.
Right arrow Articles by Woods, G. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Martinez, F.
Right arrow Articles by Woods, G. L.