Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, October 2001, p. 3733-3735, Vol. 39, No. 10
Department of Pathology, University of Texas
Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas 77555-0740
Received 28 March 2001/Returned for modification 16 May
2001/Accepted 11 July 2001
The performance of Vitek cards GPS105 with software version
VTK-R07.01 for detection of oxacillin resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) was compared to disk diffusion and PCR detection for mecA. The sensitivity and specificity of the Vitek
GPS105 method were 97.6 and 85.5%, respectively.
Coagulase-negative staphylococci
(CoNS) are important causes of nosocomial bacteremia, especially in
patients with intravenous catheters or indwelling medical devices
(1, 3, 7, 14). In some institutions, 70 to 75% of CoNS
are resistant to oxacillin; consequently, vancomycin is the therapy of
choice. If the isolate is oxacillin susceptible, treatment with a
penicillinase-resistant penicillin is preferred to minimize selection
of vancomycin-resistant organisms. A susceptibility test method that
provides accurate oxacillin results is critical.
The National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS)
changed the breakpoints for oxacillin testing of CoNS in January 1999, because of discrepancies between results of mecA genetic
assays, which are considered the reference method for detecting
oxacillin resistance in staphylococci, and the former NCCLS breakpoints
of Isolates of CoNS (n = 202) from cultures of clinical
specimens of blood and urine were collected prospectively and stored at
The 202 CoNS isolates tested (141 from urine, 61 from blood) in this
study belonged to 11 species (Table 1).
The mecA gene was detected in 126 isolates (62.4%), of five
species: Staphylococcus epidermidis, S. haemolyticus, S. hominis, S. warneri, and S. xylosus. S. capitis,
S. cohnii, S. lugdunensis, S. saprophyticus, S. sciuri, and S. simulans
were consistently mecA negative.
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.10.3733-3735.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Evaluation of the Vitek Card GPS105 and VTK-RO7.01
Software for Detection of Oxacillin Resistance in Clinically Relevant
Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
![]()
TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
4 µg/ml for resistance and
2 µg/ml for susceptibility.
Currently, for microtiter dilution and disk diffusion testing,
respectively, CoNS isolates with an MIC of
0.5 µg/ml or a zone
diameter of
17 mm are considered resistant, and those with an MIC of
0.25 µg/ml or a zone diameter of
18 mm are considered susceptible
(9). To comply with these guidelines, it was necessary for
laboratories using the Vitek (bioMerieux Vitek, Inc.) to use an
alternate method when testing CoNS. Vitek updated its software and
increased the number of oxacillin concentrations tested to accommodate
the revised oxacillin breakpoints for CoNS in September 1999. The
purpose of the present study was to evaluate the performance of the
Vitek card GPS105 with software version VTK-R07.01. The results were
compared to disk diffusion and detection of the mecA gene by PCR.
70°C. Prior to testing, isolates were subcultured twice on sheep
blood agar. Isolates were identified as CoNS using Gram stain,
catalase, and latex agglutination tests (Staphaurex; Murex Biotech
Ltd., Dartford, England). CoNS were identified to species with the API
Staph-Ident system (bioMerieux Vitek, Inc.). Disk diffusion testing was
performed according to NCCLS guidelines (10) by using
Mueller-Hinton agar without additional NaCl (BD Biosciences, Sparks,
Md.) and 1-µg oxacillin disks (BD Biosciences). Zone diameters were
measured after plates were incubated in ambient air at 35°C for
24 h. Vitek cards GPS105 were inoculated and incubated according
to manufacturer's recommendations. Results were interpreted by Vitek
software version VTK-R07.01. If disk diffusion and Vitek results
disagreed, both tests were repeated. Multiplex PCR for detection of the
mecA gene and the Staphylococcus IS431 sequence was performed as previously described (13); if isolates
did not contain the mecA gene or an IS431 sequence,
amplification of the Staphylococcus 16S rRNA sequence was
performed as described previously (6).
TABLE 1.
Vitek and disk diffusion oxacillin results after initial
testing
Initial Vitek and disk diffusion results are summarized by source in Table 1. The majority of the CoNS from blood were S. epidermidis. The mecA gene was detected in 44 (72%) of all blood isolates; all were determined to be oxacillin resistant by both disk diffusion and Vitek. All 115 mecA-negative isolates were determined to be susceptible by Vitek and disk diffusion (sensitivity and specificity of 100%).
Of the urine isolates (n = 141), 80 were mecA positive and 61 were mecA negative. Both Vitek and disk diffusion methods did not perform as well on isolates of CoNS from urine: 6 of the mecA positive isolates were determined to be susceptible by Vitek, and 11 of the mecA negative isolates were determined to be resistant (sensitivity, 92.5%; specificity, 82%). The 11 isolates that were mecA negative but oxacillin resistant as determined by Vitek and disk diffusion included six S. saprophyticus isolates, two S. lugdunensis isolates, and one isolate each of S. capitis, S. cohnii, and S. sciuri. Three species (S. epidermidis, S. hominis, and S. haemolyticus) comprised the majority of the isolates (122 of 141; 86.5%). For these three species, the sensitivity and specificity of Vitek were high (92.4 and 97.6%, respectively). After repeat testing, Vitek correctly identified 76 of the 79 mecA-positive isolates as resistant and 100% of the mecA-negative isolates as susceptible (sensitivity, 96.2; specificity, 100%).
Discrepancies between results of mecA PCR assays when CoNS
are tested and the NCCLS microtiter dilution and disk diffusion breakpoints for oxacillin against S. aureus have been
recognized for several years. For this reason, various investigators
recommended lowering the oxacillin MIC breakpoint for CoNS: York et al.
(15) suggested
1 µg/ml for susceptibility, Cormican et
al. (2) and McDonald et al. (8) suggested
0.5 µg/ml, and Marshall et al. (7) suggested
0.25
µg/ml.
Tenover et al. (12) concurred with the breakpoints of
0.25 µg/ml for susceptibility and
0.5 µg/ml for resistance
because these values allowed maximum sensitivity for detecting
mecA-positive isolates of S. epidermidis without
drastically compromising specificity. These authors acknowledged,
however, that these breakpoints were considerably less specific for
mecA in species of CoNS other than S. epidermidis. Tenover et al. (12) also suggested
modified breakpoints for disk diffusion:
17 mm for resistance and
18 mm for susceptibility. The NCCLS considered data from all studies and adopted the oxacillin MIC and disk diffusion breakpoints for CoNS
advocated by Tenover et al. Our results show that the new Vitek revised
cards and software system accurately predicts the presence or absence
of mecA in the three most commonly encountered species of CoNS.
For species of CoNS other than S. epidermidis, S. hominis, and S. haemolyticus, we found poor
correlation between mecA PCR and oxacillin testing by Vitek
or disk diffusion. In particular, isolates of S. capitis, S. cohnii, S. lugdunensis, S. saprophyticus, and S. sciuri that had an oxacillin
MIC of 0.5 µg/ml as determined by Vitek (and were resistant by disk
diffusion) were consistently mecA negative. Similar findings
have been reported by other investigators (4, 5, 12).
Hussain et al. (4) tested 493 isolates of 11 species of
CoNS (no S. scuiri) and found mecA-negative
isolates of S. capitis, S. cohnii, S. lugdunensis, and S. saprophyticus with
oxacillin MICs of 0.5 to 2.0 µg/ml by agar dilution. In a second
study, Hussain et al. (5) tested 463 isolates of 13 species of CoNS (no S. scuiri) and found
mecA-negative S. capitis, S. cohnii, S. lugdunensis, S. saprophyticus, S. caprae, S. warneri, and
S. xylosus with oxacillin MICs of
0.5 µg/ml. In the
latter study, isolates were tested by a latex agglutination test that detects penicillin-binding protein (PBP) 2a. Compared to
mecA PCR, the sensitivity of that latex test was 100% and
the specificity was 99.5%, whereas the specificity of the new NCCLS
breakpoint was 60.8%. The mechanism(s) of decreased susceptibility to
oxacillin in mecA-negative CoNS with an oxacillin MIC of 0.5 to 2.0 µg/ml is unknown, but alterations in PBPs other than PBP2a
have been documented in some strains of S. haemolyticus and
S. saprophyticus (11) and, therefore, suggested
as one possibility (12). It is not known whether
penicillinase-resistant penicillins can eradicate clinical isolates of
mecA-negative CoNS with an oxacillin MIC of 0.5 to 2.0 µg/ml. Clinical trials designed to answer this question are needed.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Promega Corporation (Madison, Wis.) for providing the PCR reagents used in this study. BioMerieux kindly provided the API Staph Identification kits.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: 5.114 McCullough Building, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Blvd., Galveston, TX 77555-0740. Phone: (409) 747-1424. Fax: (409) 772-5683. E-mail: lchandle{at}utmb.edu.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Cockerill, F. R., III, J. G. Hughes, E. A. Vetter, R. A. Meuller, A. L. Weaver, D. M. Ilstrup, J. E. Rosenblatt, and W. R. Wilson. 1997. Analysis of 281,797 consecutive blood cultures performed over an eight-year period: trends in microorganisms isolated and the value of anaerobic culture of blood. Clin. Infect. Dis. 24:403-418[Medline]. |
| 2. | Cormican, M. G., W. W. Wile, M. S. Barrett, M. A. Pfaller, and R. N. Jones. 1996. Phenotypic detection of mecA-positive staphylococcal blood stream isolates: high accuracy of simple disk diffusion tests. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 25:107-112[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 3. |
Emori, T. G., and R. P. Gaynes.
1993.
An overview of nosocomial infections, including the role of the microbiology laboratory.
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
6:428-442 |
| 4. |
Hussain, Z.,
L. Stoakes,
V. Massey,
D. Diagre,
V. Fitzgerald,
S. El Sayed, and R. Lannigan.
2000.
Correlation of oxacillin MIC with mecA gene carriage in coagulase-negative staphylococci.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
38:752-754 |
| 5. |
Hussain, Z.,
L. Stoakes,
S. Garrow,
S. Longo,
V. Fitzgerald,
S. El Sayed, and R. Lannigan.
2000.
Rapid detection of mecA-positive and mecA-negative coagulase-negative staphylococci by an anti-penicillin binding protein 2a slide latex agglutination test.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
38:2051-2054 |
| 6. |
Jaffe, R. I.,
J. D. Lane,
S. V. Albury, and D. M. Niemeyer.
2000.
Rapid extraction from and direct identification in clinical samples of methicillin-resistant staphylococci using the PCR.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
38:3407-3412 |
| 7. | Marshall, S. A., W. W. Wilke, M. A. Pfaller, and R. N. Jones. 1998. Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci from blood stream infections: frequency of occurrence, antimicrobial susceptibility, and molecular (mecA) characterization of oxacillin resistance in the SCOPE Program. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 30:205-214[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 8. | McDonald, C. L., W. E. Maher, and R. J. Fass. 1995. Revised interpretation of oxacillin MICs for Staphylococcus epidermidis based on mecA detection. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 39:982-984[Abstract]. |
| 9. | National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2001. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, 11th information supplement: M100-211, vol. 21. , no. 1. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa. |
| 10. | National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2000. Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests, 7th ed. Approved Standard M2-A7. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa. |
| 11. |
Suzuki, E.,
K. Hiramatsu, and T. Yokota.
1992.
Survey of methicillin-resistant clinical strains of coagulase-negative staphylococci for mecA gene distribution.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
36:429-434 |
| 12. |
Tenover, F. C.,
R. N. Jones,
J. M. Swenson,
B. Zimmer,
S. McAllister, and J. H. Jorgensen for the NCCLS Staphylococcal Working Group.
1999.
Methods for improved detection of oxacillin resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci: results of a multicenter study.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
37:4051-4058 |
| 13. | Vannuffel, P., J. Gigi, H. Ezzedine, B. Vandercam, M. Delmee, G. Wauters, and J. L. Gala. 1995. Specific detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus species by multiplex PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:2864-2867[Abstract]. |
| 14. | Weinstein, M. P., M. L. Towns, S. M. Quartey, S. Mirrett, L. G. Reimer, G. Parmigiani, and L. B. Reller. 1997. The clinical significance of positive blood cultures in the 1990s: a prospective comprehensive evaluation of the microbiology, epidemiology, and outcome of bacteremia and fungemia in adults. Clin. Infect. Dis. 24:584-602[Medline]. |
| 15. | York, M. K., L. Gibbs, F. Chehab, and G. F. Brooks. 1996. Comparison of PCR detection of mecA with standard susceptibility testing methods to determine methicillin resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:249-253[Abstract]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»