Skip to main page content

• HOME
• Current Issue
• Archive
• Alerts
• About ASM
• Contact us
• Tech Support
• Journals.ASM.org

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Watanabe, H. Articles by Nagatake, T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Watanabe, H. Articles by Nagatake, T.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, October 2001, p. 3775-3777, Vol. 39, No. 10
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.10.3775-3777.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Low Concentrations of Mupirocin in the Pharynx following Intranasal Application May Contribute to Mupirocin Resistance in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Hiroshi Watanabe,^1,* Hironori Masaki,¹ Norichika Asoh,¹ Kiwao Watanabe,¹ Kazunori Oishi,¹ Shinobu Kobayashi,² Akiyoshi Sato,³ Rinya Sugita,⁴ and Tsuyoshi Nagatake¹

Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nagasaki University,¹ and Departments of Internal Medicine² and Microbiology,³ Kyorin Hospital, Nagasaki, and Sugita Otorhinolaryngologic Clinic, Chiba,⁴ Japan

Received 21 May 2001/Returned for modification 11 July 2001/Accepted 24 July 2001

	ABSTRACT

Top Abstract Text References

We describe a patient with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonizing the pharynx. The MIC of mupirocin was 0.25 µg/ml before treatment and increased after treatment to 8 µg/ml. Using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, we confirmed that the genotypes of MRSA that colonized the pharynx before and after the use of mupirocin were identical. We measured the delivery of mupirocin to the pharynx in three normal volunteers and two patients. Low concentrations of mupirocin were present in the pharynx in all cases 10 min to 3 days after intranasal application. Our data suggested that low concentrations of the drug in the pharynx after intranasal application of mupirocin ointment might explain the selection of mupirocin resistance in MRSA.

	TEXT

Top Abstract Text References

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is an important pathogen and a major cause of nosocomial infection (19). MRSA strains easily colonize a host, particularly immunodeficient patients, and can cause a variety of serious infections that are often difficult to control, such as septicemia, endocarditis, meningitis, and postoperative intra-abdominal infection (3, 12, 13). Mupirocin is the most effective antibiotic for elimination of MRSA from the nasal passages (6). Moreover, intranasal application of mupirocin ointment is effective in reducing surgical-site infections and the likelihood of bronchopulmonary tract infection (5, 15). However, cases of mupirocin-resistant MRSA have already been reported (11). In Japan, mupirocin has been used only for the eradication of nasal colonization by MRSA since September 1996, and low-level mupirocin-resistant MRSA appeared in the early stages (17). We had a patient in whom the MRSA that colonized in the pharynx changed to low-level mupirocin-resistant MRSA after intranasal application of mupirocin ointment. We examined the genotypes of MRSA that colonized the pharynx before and after the use of mupirocin in the same patient and the delivery of mupirocin to the pharynx after intranasal application in three healthy volunteers and two patients with MRSA colonization of the pharynx.

All studies described herein were approved by the Human Ethics Review Boards of our institutions, and a signed consent form was obtained from each subject. The patient with low-level mupirocin-resistant MRSA was a 78-year-old male who had an old cerebral infarction. Spread of low-level mupirocin-resistant MRSA had been reported in the hospital to which the patient was admitted (17). MRSA colonized only the nasal cavity and pharynx, and MRSA strains in both were mupirocin susceptible (MIC, 0.25 µg/ml). MIC was determined by the agar dilution method according to the guidelines of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (8). Specimens were obtained by swabs from the anterior nares and the pharynx and then were cultured in TSA II medium supplemented with 5% rabbit blood agar and on selective medium for MRSA (OPA-Staphylococcus agar) (both from Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems) for 24 h at 37°C. Identification of S. aureus was based on the morphology of colonies and use of specific kits (Staphylo-LA [slide latex agglutination]; Denka Seiken, Tokyo, Japan). MRSA was evaluated by the oxacillin disk diffusion method (Kirby-Bauer) according to the guidelines of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (9). Intranasal application of mupirocin ointment resulted in the eradication of MRSA strains that colonized the nasal cavity but not those that colonized the pharynx. The latter were transformed into low-level mupirocin-resistant MRSA (MIC, 8 µg/ml). The genotypes of MRSA that colonized the pharynx were examined before and after intranasal application of mupirocin by using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) as described previously (18) and were found to be identical (Fig. 1). The DNA was digested with 10 U of SmaI (Takara Shuzo Co., Shiga, Japan) at 30°C overnight. A contour-clamped homogeneous electric field pulsed-field electrophoresis system (CHEF Mapper; Bio-Rad Life Science) was used for electrophoresis, with the potential set at 6 V/cm, switch times set at 0.47 and 63 s, and the run time set at 20 h 18 min. After staining with ethidium bromide, the band patterns were compared according to the criteria for bacterial strain typing described by Tenover et al. (16). Since no other antibiotics were used during this period apart from mupirocin, we suspected that application of mupirocin nasal ointment was the possible cause of the selection of mupirocin-resistant MRSA that colonized the pharynx.

View larger version (43K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 1.   Mupirocin-susceptible MRSA (A; MIC, 0.25 µg/ml) that colonized the pharynx of our patient was transformed into low-level mupirocin-resistant MRSA (B; MIC, 8 µg/ml) after intranasal application of mupirocin ointment. The genotypes of MRSA that colonized the pharynx before and after the use of mupirocin in the same patient were identical by PFGE with SmaI.

To confirm this hypothesis, we measured in another series of studies the concentrations of mupirocin in the pharynges of three healthy volunteers and two patients with MRSA colonization in the pharynx (one in only the pharynx and the other in both the nasal cavity and pharynx) using a simple in vitro bioassay. For the bioassay, a standard curve was constructed by twofold serial dilutions of mupirocin-lithium phosphate buffer at pH 6.5. The bioassay was performed in brain heart infusion agar seeded with S. aureus ATCC 6538P. The detection limit of the assay was 0.05 µg. Two patients had bronchiectasis and allergic rhinitis or chronic sinusitis as the underlying disease. The MICs of MRSA against mupirocin were 4.0 and 0.25 µg/ml for the two patients. Mupirocin was applied to the anterior nares for 3 days. Cotton-tipped swab sticks were used to obtain pharyngeal secretions transorally, and the collected samples adhering to the cotton were dissolved in 6 ml of methanol. Subsequently, the dry-fixed samples were dissolved in 0.1 M phosphate buffer and analyzed. The concentration of mupirocin in the pharynx ranged from 0.13 to 27.7 µg/sample, although the local concentration of mupirocin was 20,000 µg/ml. At these concentrations, MRSA colonization in the pharynges of the two patients could not be eradicated, although MRSA colonizing the nasal cavity of one patient was eradicated. The presence of low concentrations of mupirocin in the pharynx throughout the entire observation period of 3 days was confirmed in all cases, although the numerical value was different in each case.

Cilia in the nasopharynx are known to move particles from the nasal cavity into the pharynx, and such a process might be involved in the transport of mupirocin nasal ointment to the pharynx, resulting in low concentrations of the antibiotic in the pharynx, thus enhancing the selection of mupirocin resistance. Low-level and high-level mupirocin-resistant MRSA strains have been described previously (1, 4). Mupirocin resistance in MRSA results from changes in the target enzyme, isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase, while high-level mupirocin resistance is plasmid encoded. Mupirocin-resistant MRSA was first isolated from the skin of patients who were treated with mupirocin for long periods (11, 14), and several reports have cautioned against the long-term use of mupirocin in patients with skin infection (2, 10). Other studies have reported the development of mupirocin-resistant MRSA after widespread use of nasal mupirocin ointment (7). On the basis of these studies, it could be speculated that the cause of such resistance is related to our results, i.e., low concentrations of the antibiotic in the pharynx.

In conclusion, nasal application of mupirocin at clinically effective concentrations may result in low levels of the antibiotic in the pharynx, which could consequently induce or select for the emergence of mupirocin-resistant MRSA.

	ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Akihiro Wada (Department of Bacteriology, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nagasaki University), Chieko Shimauchi (Miyazaki Prefectural Nursing University), and Matsuhisa Inoue (Kitasato University School of Medicine) for their help in completion of PFGE studies. We also thank Glaxo SmithKline K.K. for measuring the concentration of mupirocin.

	FOOTNOTES

^* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nagasaki University, 1-12-4 Sakamoto, Nagasaki 852-8523, Japan. Phone: 81 (95) 849-7842. Fax: 81 (95) 849-7843. E-mail: h-wata{at}net.nagasaki-u.ac.jp.

	REFERENCES

Top Abstract Text References

1.	Bastos, M. C., P. J. Mondino, M. L. Azevedo, K. R. Santos, and M. Giambiagi deMarval. 1999. Molecular characterization and transfer among Staphylococcus strains of a plasmid conferring high-level resistance to mupirocin. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 18:393-398[CrossRef][Medline].
2.	Cookson, B. D., R. W. Lacey, W. C. Noble, D. S. Reeves, R. Wise, and R. J. Redhead. 1990. Mupirocin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet 335:1095-1096[Medline].
3.	Fierobe, L., D. Decre, C. Muller, J. C. Lucet, J. P. Marmuse, J. Mantz, and J. M. Desmonts. 1999. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus as a causative agent of postoperative intra-abdominal infection: relation to nasal colonization. Clin. Infect. Dis. 29:1231-1238[CrossRef][Medline].
4.	Gilbart, J., C. R. Perry, and B. Slocombe. 1993. High-level mupirocin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus: evidence for two distinct isoleucyl-tRNA synthetases. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 37:32-38[Abstract/Free Full Text].
5.	Harbarth, S., S. Dharan, N. Liassine, P. Herrault, R. Auckenthaler, and D. Pittet. 1999. Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial to evaluate the efficacy of mupirocin for eradicating carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:1412-1416[Abstract/Free Full Text].
6.	Hill, R. L. R., G. J. Duckworth, and M. W. Casewell. 1988. Elimination of nasal carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with mupirocin during a hospital outbreak. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 22:377-384[Abstract/Free Full Text].
7.	Miller, M. A., A. Dascal, J. Portnoy, and J. Mendelson. 1996. Development of mupirocin resistance among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus after widespread use of nasal mupirocin ointment. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 17:811-813[Medline].
8.	National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 1998. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. Approved standard M7-A4. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
9.	National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 1998. Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests. Approved standard M2-A6. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
10.	Neu, H. C. 1990. The use of mupirocin in controlling methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 11:11-12[Medline].
11.	Rahman, M., W. C. Noble, and B. Cookson. 1987. Mupirocin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet ii:387.
12.	Rubio, M., J. Romero, O. Corral, V. Roca, and J. J. Picazo. 1999. Bacteremia by Staphylococcus aureus: analysis of 311 episodes. Enferm. Infec. Microbiol. Clin. 17:56-64[Medline].
13.	Sakamoto, T., K. Kikuchi, K. Mineura, M. Kowada, and O. Nakagomi. 1990. MRSA meningitis in postoperative patients. Report of 4 cases. Jpn. J. Antibiot. 43:1137-1142[Medline].
14.	Smith, G. E., and C. T. C. Kennedy. 1988. Staphylococcus aureus resistant tomupirocin. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 21:141-142[Free Full Text].
15.	Talon, D., C. Rouget, V. Cailleaux, P. Bailly, M. Thouverez, F. Barale, and Y. Michel-Briand. 1995. Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus and cross-contamination in a surgical intensive care unit: efficacy of mupirocin ointment. J. Hosp. Infect. 30:39-49[CrossRef][Medline].
16.	Tenover, F. C., R. D. Arbeit, R. V. Goering, P. A. Mickelsen, B. E. Murray, D. H. Persing, and B. Swaminathan. 1995. Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:2233-2239[Medline].
17.	Watanabe, H., H. Masaki, N. Asoh, K. Watanabe, K. Oishi, A. Furumoto, S. Kobayashi, A. Sato, and T. Nagatake. 2001. Emergence and spread of low-level mupirocin resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from a community hospital in Japan. J. Hosp. Infect. 47:294-300[CrossRef][Medline].
18.	Watanabe, H., H. Masaki, N. Asoh, K. Watanabe, K. Oishi, S. Kobayashi, A. Sato, and T. Nagatake. 2000. Molecular analysis of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus as a causative agent of bronchopulmonary infection: relation to colonization in the upper respiratory tract. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:3867-3869[Abstract/Free Full Text].
19.	Wenzel, R. P., M. D. Nettleman, R. N. Jones, and M. A. Pfaller. 1991. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: implications for the 1990s and effective control measures. Am. J. Med. 91(Suppl. 3B):221S-227S[CrossRef][Medline].

---

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, October 2001, p. 3775-3777, Vol. 39, No. 10
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.10.3775-3777.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Nilsson, P., Ripa, T. (2006). Staphylococcus aureus Throat Colonization Is More Frequent than Colonization in the Anterior Nares.. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 3334-3339 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Hurdle, J. G., O'Neill, A. J., Chopra, I. (2005). Prospects for Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetase Inhibitors as New Antimicrobial Agents. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49: 4821-4833 [Full Text]  
• Critchley, I. A., Young, C. L., Stone, K. C., Ochsner, U. A., Guiles, J., Tarasow, T., Janjic, N. (2005). Antibacterial Activity of REP8839, a New Antibiotic for Topical Use. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49: 4247-4252 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Ochsner, U. A., Young, C. L., Stone, K. C., Dean, F. B., Janjic, N., Critchley, I. A. (2005). Mode of Action and Biochemical Characterization of REP8839, a Novel Inhibitor of Methionyl-tRNA Synthetase. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49: 4253-4262 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Rouse, M. S., Rotger, M., Piper, K. E., Steckelberg, J. M., Scholz, M., Andrews, J., Patel, R. (2005). In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluations of the Activities of Lauric Acid Monoester Formulations against Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49: 3187-3191 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Wertheim, H. F. L., Verveer, J., Boelens, H. A. M., van Belkum, A., Verbrugh, H. A., Vos, M. C. (2005). Effect of Mupirocin Treatment on Nasal, Pharyngeal, and Perineal Carriage of Staphylococcus aureus in Healthy Adults. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49: 1465-1467 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Hurdle, J. G., O'Neill, A. J., Ingham, E., Fishwick, C., Chopra, I. (2004). Analysis of Mupirocin Resistance and Fitness in Staphylococcus aureus by Molecular Genetic and Structural Modeling Techniques. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48: 4366-4376 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kruszewska, D., Sahl, H.-G., Bierbaum, G., Pag, U., Hynes, S. O., Ljungh, A. (2004). Mersacidin eradicates methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in a mouse rhinitis model. J Antimicrob Chemother 54: 648-653 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Chaves, F., Garcia-Martinez, J., de Miguel, S., Otero, J. R. (2004). Molecular Characterization of Resistance to Mupirocin in Methicillin-Susceptible and -Resistant Isolates of Staphylococcus aureus from Nasal Samples. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 822-824 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Hurdle, J. G., O'Neill, A. J., Chopra, I. (2004). The isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase mutation V588F conferring mupirocin resistance in glycopeptide-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus is not associated with a significant fitness burden. J Antimicrob Chemother 53: 102-104 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kokai-Kun, J. F., Walsh, S. M., Chanturiya, T., Mond, J. J. (2003). Lysostaphin Cream Eradicates Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Colonization in a Cotton Rat Model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47: 1589-1597 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Horii, T., Morita, M., Muramatsu, H., Muranaka, Y., Kanno, T., Maekawa, M. (2003). Effects of mupirocin at subinhibitory concentrations on flagella formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Proteus mirabilis. J Antimicrob Chemother 51: 1175-1179 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Watanabe, H. Articles by Nagatake, T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Watanabe, H. Articles by Nagatake, T.