Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, November 2001, p. 3851-3857, Vol. 39, No. 11
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.11.3851-3857.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Validation of a Commercially Available Monoclonal Antibody-Based
Competitive-Inhibition Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Detection
of Serum Antibodies to Neospora caninum in
Cattle
Timothy V.
Baszler,1,2,*
Scott
Adams,3
John
Vander-Schalie,2
Bruce A.
Mathison,1 and
Miladin
Kostovic3
Department of Veterinary Microbiology and
Pathology, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington
99164-70401; Washington Animal Disease
Diagnostic Laboratory, Washington State University, Pullman,
Washington 99165-20342; and VMRD
Inc., Pullman, Washington 991633
Received 16 March 2001/Returned for modification 17 June
2001/Accepted 20 August 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
A previously described monoclonal antibody (MAb)-based
competitive-inhibition enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
(cELISA) was modified to optimize performance, and the assay was
validated in various defined cattle populations for detection of serum
antibody to Neospora caninum, a major cause of bovine
abortion. Modifications to the cELISA included capturing native
N. caninum antigen with a parasite-specific MAb (MAb
5B6-25) and directly conjugating the competitor MAb (MAb 4A4-2), with
both MAbs binding different epitopes of a conserved, immunodominant
65-kDa tachyzoite surface antigen. The assay was validated using three
serum sets, a "gold standard" set of 184 cow sera defined by fetal
histopathology and N. caninum immunohistochemistry and
by maternal N. caninum indirect fluorescence assay (IFA)
at a 1:200 serum dilution, a relative standard set of 330 cow sera
defined by IFA alone, and a set of 4,323 cow sera of unknown N.
caninum status. A test cutoff of 30% inhibition was
identified. The diagnostic sensitivity was 97.6%, and diagnostic
specificity was 98.6% for the gold standard abortion-defined sera. The
diagnostic sensitivity was 96.4%, and diagnostic specificity was
96.8% for the relative standard IFA-defined sera. Testing of the 4,323 bovine sera of unknown N. caninum status revealed a
distinct bimodal distribution and steep sigmoid frequency curve with
only 1.8% of samples within 5% of the test cutoff, indicating a sharp
discrimination between test-positive and test-negative samples. In
summary, the modified N. caninum cELISA provided a simple, rapid, and versatile method to accurately identify N. caninum infection status in cattle using a single cutoff value.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Infection with Neospora
caninum, an apicomplexan protozoan parasite, is reported as a
significant cause of economic loss in dairy and beef cattle herds
worldwide due primarily to abortion and reduced reproductive efficiency
but also to poor milk production, increased culling, and poor feed
efficiency (2, 10, 23, 24, 26). Similar to
Toxoplasma gondii, N. caninum has a two-host herbivore-carnivore life cycle. Domestic dogs are identified to date as
a definitive parasite host capable of shedding infective oocysts
(9, 14, 18). The diagnosis of N. caninum-induced abortion in individual cattle is based upon
examination of fetal tissues for histological lesions (3),
for tachyzoites by immunohistochemistry (13), or for
parasite DNA by PCR (4). Validated N. caninum-specific serological assays are necessary for accurate
herd-based abortion diagnosis (25) and for
population-based epidemiological investigations of disease
transmission, disease risk factors, and identification of additional
definitive and intermediate hosts.
Many serologic tests for detecting N. caninum antibodies are
described for cattle, including indirect fluorescence assay
(IFA), Western blot assay, agglutination assay, and various
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) based upon either whole or
partially purified native N. caninum antigen or recombinant
N. caninum antigen (1, 8, 10), antibody avidity
(7), or competitive inhibition with parasite-specific
monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) (5). The purpose of this
paper is to report validation data for a new
competitive-inhibition ELISA (cELISA) closely based upon a previously
described MAb-based cELISA that detects serum antibody to a 65-kDa
immunodominant N. caninum tachyzoite surface antigen
(5). The newly formatted cELISA was modified by capturing
N. caninum native 65-kDa antigen with a newly described MAb
(MAb 5B6-25) and by directly conjugating the competitor MAb
previously described (5). The captured-antigen cELISA has
decreased nonspecific antibody binding and allowed the use of
undiluted test sera to increase both assay specificity and sensitivity.
Direct conjugation of the competitor MAb was done to increase the
versatility of the test for use in multiple animal species. Both
captured N. caninum 65-kDa ELISA plates and MAb conjugate
are commercially available (VMRD Inc.).
The original description of the N. caninum 65-kDa
MAb-based cELISA reported various development and standardization
data, including the specificity of MAb 4A4-2 for N. caninum,
optimal concentrations of antigen and MAb, the analytical
specificity using a panel of sera from animals with experimental
infections with related protozoa, and testing a small panel of N. caninum defined bovine sera (5). In the present
analysis, the newly formatted cELISA was more thoroughly validated by
determining the optimal test cutoff; by determining the diagnostic
sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy using large sets of defined
reference sera; and by long-term monitoring of assay performance. The
goal was to test the discriminatory ability of the cELISA on both
high-titer sera, obtained from cows aborting N. caninum-infected fetuses, and low-titer sera, obtained from random
herd samples.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Parasites and N. caninum antigen preparation.
Polystyrene (96-well) plates coated with captured N. caninum
antigen were obtained commercially (VMRD Inc., Pullman, Wash.). Native
parasite antigen (NSo) was obtained from tachyzoites of the NC-1
isolate of N. caninum (11) as previously
described (5). Tachyzoites from the RH strain of T. gondii and bradyzoites from two isolates of Sarcocystis
cruzi were processed similarly for dot blot assay. For
plate coating, a previously unpublished N. caninum MAb, MAb
5B6-25, was used for antigen capture. The MAb was generated by
immunizing BALB/c mice with sonicated N. caninum antigen in
Freund's complete adjuvant as previously described (5).
Clinical samples and experimental design.
Cattle sera were
submitted to the Washington Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory at
Washington State University for routine diagnostic investigation. Sera
were grouped into three separate test groups according to N. caninum status (Table 1). The sera originated from commercial dairy and beef herds in the Pacific Northwest region of the United States in Washington, Idaho, and Oregon
(groups 1, 2, and 3) and from the Eastern Seaboard region of the United
States in Virginia and Maryland (portion of group 2). All sera were
stored at
70°C.
Group 1 sera, used as a "gold standard" for validation,
consisted of
N. caninum-positive and
N. caninum-negative sera defined
by IFA and abortion status as
determined by histopathology and
immunohistochemistry of aborted fetal
tissues. Aborted fetuses
were submitted to the Washington Animal
Disease Diagnostic Laboratory
as part of an abortion diagnosis kit
which included histopathology
(brain, heart, liver, lung, kidney,
placenta, thymus, adrenal
gland, thyroid gland, spleen, and skeletal
muscle), bacterial
culture and virus isolation from fresh tissue pool,
and maternal
serology for antibodies to abortofacient pathogens
(
N. caninum,
infectious bovine rhinotracheitis herpesvirus,
bovine virus diarrhea
virus,
Leptospira spp., and
Brucella abortus).
N. caninum-positive
aborted
fetuses in group 1 had histopathological changes consistent
with
N. caninum infection and tachyzoites within affected tissues
detectable by
N. caninum-specific immunohistochemistry.
Maternal
sera were obtained within 2 weeks following abortion. For the
purposes of the present study, histopathological changes compatible
with
N. caninum abortion had to be present, at a minimum, in
the
brain and heart (
3,
29). The lesions consisted of
moderate
or severe multifocal necrosis and gliosis in the brain
associated
with nonsuppurative encephalitis and moderate or severe
nonsuppurative
myocarditis. Parasite infection was confirmed by
immunohistochemical
demonstration of tachyzoites in fetal brain using
hyperimmune
goat anti-
N. caninum serum (VMRD Inc.).
Group 1
N. caninum-negative
aborted fetuses did not have
microscopic lesions compatible with
N. caninum infection.
Group 2 sera, used as relative standards for validation, were
defined as
N. caninum positive or negative by IFA alone as
described
previously (
5), using commercially available,
acetone-fixed,
N. caninum tachyzoite slides (VMRD Inc.). The
abortion status
of dams contributing individual samples was not known.
The sera
originated both from herds experiencing
N. caninum
abortion problems,
as epizootic or enzootic abortion, and from herds
not experiencing
abortion
problems.
Group 3 sera, used for monitoring assay validation, had
undefined
N. caninum status by any method but originated
from cattle
herds experiencing abortion problems. The sera were
submitted
over a 3-year period (1998 to 2000) to the Washington Animal
Disease
Diagnostic Laboratory for routine abortion screen
serology.
The specificity and sensitivity of detecting
N. caninum serum antibodies by cELISA were determined from both group
1 and group
2 sera using the following formulas: sensitivity = (number of
cELISA test-positive sera/number of reference positive
sera) ×
100; specificity = number of cELISA test-negative
sera/number
of reference negative sera) × 100); accuracy = [(number of cELISA
test-positive sera + number of cELISA test-negative
sera)/(number
of reference positive sera + number of reference negative
sera)]
× 100. The frequency distribution and bivariate
scattergram used
to analyze group 3 sera determined how sharply the
cELISA discriminated
between test-positive and test-negative
samples.
Histopathology and immunohistochemistry
Fetal tissues were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin, paraffin
embedded, and processed for routine histopathology and immunohistochemistry as previously described (16).
Positive control tissue consisted of formalin-fixed brain tissue from
BALB/c mice experimentally inoculated with the NC-1 strain of N.
caninum (15). Negative controls consisted of
replacement of the primary antibody with a similar dilution of normal
goat serum on all examined tissues.
As part of characterizing epitopes bound by
N. caninum MAbs 5B6-2 and 4A4-2, some
N. caninum-infected
mouse brains also were
immunostained with dilutions of concentrated
hybridoma supernatants
followed by biotinylated rabbit anti-mouse
immunoglobulin G and
peroxidase-conjugated streptavidin-biotin
complex as described
above.
Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
(SDS-PAGE) and immunoblotting. (i) Dot blot.
Sonicated antigens of
N. caninum, T. gondii, or S. cruzi
were absorbed to nitrocellulose sheets using a dot blot manifold and
probed with MAb 5B6-25 to determine N. caninum specificity as previously described (5).
(ii) SDS-PAGE and Western blotting.
N. caninum
antigen (NSo) was separated by SDS-PAGE under denaturing conditions,
transferred to nitrocellulose, and probed with N. caninum
antibody as previously described to determine the specificity of MAb
5B6-25 compared to MAb 4A4-2 and N. caninum-positive mouse
serum (5). Immunoblotting assay controls consisted of replacement of the primary antibody with buffer alone (secondary reagent control) and inclusion of a lane containing a
concentration-matched, isotype-matched irrelevant MAb (isotype control).
IFA for detection of antibodies to N.
caninum.
Group 1 and 2 bovine sera were tested for the
presence of N. caninum antibodies by IFA as previously
described (5) but using commercially available slides
containing acetone-fixed N. caninum tachyzoites (VMRD Inc.).
The cutoff for a positive test was a serum dilution of 1:200. Some test
sera were diluted only to 1:200, and some test sera were diluted
twofold in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) starting at a dilution of
1:50. One investigator (S.A.) read IFA slides without knowledge of
N. caninum status. Sera were considered positive if the
entire surface of the tachyzoite was fluorescent. All IFAs included
known positive and negative bovine sera as controls.
cELISA.
The cELISA procedure was modified from previously
reported techniques (5). The primary differences included
the use of N. caninum 65-kDa captured antigen, undiluted
test sera, and direct conjugate (directly conjugated competitor MAb
4A4-2). Fifty microliters of undiluted test bovine serum was added to
individual wells of 96-well plates containing captured N. caninum 65-kDa antigen (VMRD Inc.) and incubated 60 min at room
temperature. A small subset of serum samples from group 2 sera was
diluted twofold in PBS from 1:2 to 1:128 for correlation studies with
IFA titer. Following thorough washing (three times) in wash buffer (0.1 M PBS, pH 7.2, containing 0.05% Tween 20), 50 µl of
peroxidase-conjugated N. caninum MAb 4A4-2 (VMRD Inc.),
diluted 1:30, was added to each well and incubated for 20 min at room
temperature. The optimal concentration of MAb 4A4-2 was determined
previously by limiting-dilution titration of MAb 4A4-2
(5). The amount of bound MAb 4A4-2 was measured by adding
50 µl of TM-Blue substrate (BioFX Laboratories, Inc., Owings Mills,
Md.) to each well and incubating in the dark for 20 min. The reaction
was stopped by adding 50 µl of 1% NaF per well, and the optical
density at 620 nm (OD620) was measured with a
Dynatech MR-5000 ELISA plate reader. Each cELISA included controls of
(i) two wells of known positive bovine sera (as identified by IFA and
immunoblotting); (ii) MAb 4A4-2 conjugate alone (to determine maximal
OD620 of MAb 4A4-2); and (iii) four wells of pooled negative reference bovine sera, pooled from 10 cows identified as negative for N. caninum antibodies by IFA and
immunoblotting at a 1:10 dilution. After initial test validation with
group 1 sera, each test run had a mean OD for negative controls of
>0.5 and <1.2 and a mean percent inhibition for positive control of
30%. The percent inhibition of MAb 4A4-2 binding to captured NSo was
calculated as 100
[(OD of test sera/mean OD of negative reference sera) × 100].
 |
RESULTS |
Characteristics of N. caninum MAb 5B6-25.
Monoclonal antibody 5B6-25 was identified as immunoglobulin G1 by
radial immunodiffusion and bound diffusely to the exterior surface of
viable N. caninum tachyzoites as indicated by IFA (not shown). Dot blot assay revealed binding of MAb 5B6-25 at low
concentrations (0.05 µg/ml) to sonicated N. caninum
antigen (NSo), while binding to sonicated antigens of T. gondii or S. cruzi was not observed (not shown).
Western blot analysis revealed MAb 5B6-25 bound to a single N. caninum tachyzoite antigen with a molecular mass of 65 kDa,
similar to N. caninum competitor MAb 4A4-2 (not shown) (5). Immunohistochemistry analysis on formalin-fixed,
paraffin-embedded brain from experimentally infected mice revealed
immunoreactivity with MAb 5B6-25 but no immunoreactivity with MAb 4A4-2
(not shown).
Performance of cELISA on abortion-defined N.
caninum-positive and N. caninum-negative
sera.
A test cutoff of 30% inhibition from pooled negative
reference control sera was determined from analysis of cELISA test
performance on group 1 abortion-defined N. caninum-positive
and -negative sera (Table 1). Nonparametric statistical analysis
(Mann-Whitney test) of mean percent inhibition revealed a significant
difference between N. caninum-positive and N. caninum-negative groups (P
0.0001) (Fig.
1A). From this data analysis a 30%
inhibition cutoff was chosen because the value was greater than 2 standard deviations of the mean percent inhibition of the gold standard negative sera. Histogram analysis of percent inhibition value from
group 1 sera indicated a distinct bimodal distribution (Fig. 1B). A
frequency distribution plot of percent inhibition was a steep sigmoid
curve (Fig. 1C). Only 2.1% of samples (3 of 144) were within 5% of
the 30% inhibition cutoff, indicating a sharp distinction between
N. caninum disease-positive and -negative sera. The
calculated test sensitivity was 97.6%, and test specificity was
98.6%; test accuracy was 97.8% (Table
2).

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
cELISA analysis of bovine sera defined by N.
caninum abortion status (group 1). (A) Mean cELISA percent
inhibition and variation of test-positive and test-negative sera. Error
bars, 2 standard deviations. (B) Histogram of the distribution
of cELISA percent inhibition values. (C) Frequency distribution of the
cELISA percent inhibition values of N. caninum
abortion-positive and N. caninum abortion-negative
sera.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 2.
Performance of N. caninum MAb cELISA
using abortion-defined N. caninum-positive
and N. caninum-negative bovine sera
|
|
Performance of cELISA on IFA-defined N.
caninum-positive and N. caninum-negative
sera.
Disease-defined group 1 sera likely contained highly biased
positive and negative samples (very-high-titer postabortion samples and
negative samples) and may not represent the full spectrum of N. caninum antibody titers encountered in field investigations (19, 28). For this reason, we tested cELISA performance on group 2 sera (Table 1) obtained from cows in herds experiencing N. caninum abortions, but not necessarily originating from
individual cows aborting N. caninum-infected fetuses, and
from herds not experiencing abortions. This included cows with low
titers (<1:800) by IFA that are not consistently identified as
Neospora positive by Neospora ELISA. The titers
of group 2 N. caninum IFA-positive sera ranged from 1:200 to
1:25,600; 21% of samples had serum IFA titers of 1:200 to 1:800.
Nonparametric statistical analysis (Mann-Whitney test) revealed a
significant difference between N. caninum IFA-positive and
N. caninum IFA-negative groups (P
0.0001)
(Fig. 2A). The 30% inhibition cutoff
value was outside 2 standard deviations from the mean of both
IFA-positive and IFA-negative sera. Histogram analysis of group 2 sera
indicated a bimodal distribution of test results (Fig. 2B). The
frequency distribution plot of percent inhibition for group 2 sera was
a sigmoid curve slightly flatter than that for group 1 sera (Fig. 2C).
Nevertheless, only 4.2% of samples (14 of 330) were within 5% of the
30% inhibition cutoff, indicating a sharp distinction between
test-positive and test-negative sera. The calculated test
sensitivity was 96.4%, and test specificity was 96.8%; test accuracy
was 96.7% (Table 3).

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
cELISA analysis of bovine sera defined by N.
caninum IFA status (group 2). (A) Mean cELISA percent
inhibition and variation of test-positive and test-negative sera. Error
bars, 2 standard deviations. (B) Histogram of the distribution of
cELISA percent inhibition values. (C) Frequency distribution of the
cELISA percent inhibition values of N. caninum
IFA-positive and N. caninum IFA-negative sera.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 3.
Performance of N. caninum MAb cELISA using
IFA-defined N. caninum-positive and N. caninum-negative bovine sera
|
|
Of the 330 samples in group 2, 154 had complete IFA titer data, and for
these the correlation between cELISA values and IFA
titers was
examined. Although the concordance between IFA and
cELISA in
distinguishing test-positive and test-negative results
was high (as
shown above and in Table
3), there was poor correlation
between the
cELISA percent inhibition value or raw OD value and
the IFA titer
(
r2 = 0.22) (Fig.
3A). However, when a subset of test
sera (IFA titers
ranging from 1:200 to 1:12,800) were diluted twofold
in the cELISA
from 1:2 to 1:128, there was excellent correlation in
rank between
the cELISA titer value and the IFA titer value
(
r2 = 0.90) (Fig.
3B).

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Comparison of IFA titer and cELISA percent inhibition
(A) or IFA titer and cELISA titer (B). IFA titer is the highest serum
dilution with diffuse tachyzoite fluorescence. cELISA titer is the
highest serum dilution with 30% inhibition.
|
|
Performance of cELISA on field sera of unknown N.
caninum status.
The performance of cELISA on field samples
of unknown N. caninum status was evaluated with 4,323 bovine
sera submitted to the Washington Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory
over a 3-year period (1998 to 2000) (Table 1, group 3). The large
majority of samples originated from herds experiencing abortions. A
frequency distribution plot of percent inhibition revealed a steep
sigmoid curve and a clear distinction between test-positive and
test-negative sera (Fig. 4A), similar to
the curve obtained using abortion-defined group 1 N. caninum-positive and -negative sera (Fig. 1C). Only 1.8% (79 of
4,323) of samples were within 5% of the 30% inhibition cutoff value,
indicating clear discrimination between test-positive and test-negative
results. Histogram analysis of group 3 sera indicated a bimodal
distribution of test results, representing the clear distinction
between test-positive and test-negative samples (Fig. 4B).

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
cELISA analysis of undefined bovine sera with unknown
N. caninum antibody or abortion status (group 3).
(A) Frequency distribution of the cELISA percent inhibition values. (B)
Histogram of the distribution of cELISA percent inhibition values.
Error bars, standard deviations.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
A commercially available modification of a previously described
MAb-based cELISA provided clear discrimination of defined N. caninum-positive and -negative bovine sera. The test groups of
sera contained a full range of N. caninum antibody levels
likely to be encountered in field investigations, from 1:200 to
>1:25,000 as measured by IFA. The test performance, as shown by
diagnostic sensitivity, diagnostic specificity, and test accuracy using
a single cutoff point, was equal to or superior to those of other N. caninum serological assays using abortion-defined or
neonatal precolostral antibody-defined gold standard reference sera
(1, 17, 20, 21, 28). It was not necessary with the cELISA to change cutoff values in order to maximize diagnostic sensitivity and
diagnostic specificity, a method suggested for other N. caninum serological assays to improve test performance depending
upon the cattle population under study (postabortion, nonpostabortion, calves, whole herd, etc.) (1, 21, 22). Furthermore,
ongoing validation with more than 4,300 bovine sera of unknown N. caninum infection status showed clear bimodal distribution of data
and clear distinction of positive and negative results. These data revealed no necessity to modify the standard 30% cutoff point of the
cELISA after extensive field testing.
According to the Office International Des Epizooties, validation of
diagnostic assays for infectious diseases involves five stages: (i)
determination of test feasibility; (ii) optimization and
standardization of reagents and protocols; (iii) determination of assay
performance; (iv) monitoring assay performance for validity; and (v)
maintenance and extension of validation criteria (12). Stages i and ii for a MAb-based cELISA for detection of serum antibodies to N. caninum in cattle were reported previously
and demonstrated that MAb 4A4-2 conjugate detected an epitope on
N. caninum that was not present in members of the closely
related Sarcocystidae family; that the epitope was immunodominant, as indicated by inducing a high antibody titer (>1:10,000) in infected cattle; and that MAb 4A4-2 was competitively inhibited by sera from a
small sample of N. caninum-infected cows (5).
The present data report on modifications of stage ii and implementation
of stages iii and iv, validation of test performance (establishment of
test cutoff, normalization of data, and calculation of diagnostic sensitivity and diagnostic specificity) and ongoing test monitoring. Although our data included only a total of 212 defined N. caninum-positive sera and 302 defined N. caninum-negative sera (group 1 and group 2 sera), numbers that
fall below the Office International Des Epizooties standards of 300 known positive sera and 1,000 known negative sera for initial
determination of diagnostic sensitivity and specificity, our sample
numbers are above those of most other reports for performance of
serological tests for N. caninum to allow for reasonable
comparisons between tests (6, 20, 21, 27, 28).
Quantitative analysis of N. caninum cELISA percent
inhibition values or raw OD values correlated poorly with individual
IFA titers despite excellent qualitative concordance between the two assays in distinguishing positive from negative sera for several possible reasons. Most importantly, the titration of sera in cELISA results in a sigmoid curve of percent inhibition values, with plateaus
at high and low antibody levels. The percent inhibition values in the
high plateau occur with bovine sera with both high and low IFA titers,
as indicated in Fig. 3A. This shows that competitive inhibition in the
cELISA format reaches a maximum after which addition of more competing
antibody does not significantly effect the OD or percent inhibition
value. Thus, comparing the cELISA results with indirect ELISA or
non-ELISA serological assays will draw erroneous conclusions if raw
percent inhibition or OD values are compared with test values obtained
by serum dilution. Secondly, IFA and cELISA may measure different
biological properties of immunoglobulin and likely measure different
total antibody populations. IFA is affected primarily by antibody
quantity, whereas cELISA is affected by both quantity and binding
affinity of serum antibody in order to effectively compete with MAb
conjugate. Finally, serum antibodies that compete for binding to
N. caninum antigen may be present at low levels, not high
enough to affect IFA titer, yet still be efficiently detected by cELISA.
The specificity of the N. caninum cELISA in this report
relies on the N. caninum-specific MAb conjugate 4A4-2.
Formatting the assay for use with undiluted sera maximizes test
sensitivity. Because the MAb 4A4-2 is directly conjugated, there is no
need for species-specific linker reagents or secondary functions such as agglutination, which makes the assay simple, very rapid, and adaptable to sera from a broad range of test species. The use of cELISA
in other species will require validation data similar to this report
and may result in some adjustment of the percent inhibition cutoff
value. MAb-based cELISA should be easy to standardize for large-scale
epidemiological studies and disease-monitoring programs of multiple
animal species.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We acknowledge the technical expertise in the serology,
immunohistochemistry, and histology sections at the Washington Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory. We also thank Travis McGuire for his
critical review of the manuscript.
This research was supported in part by research grant US-2913-97 from
The United States-Israel Binational Agricultural Research and
Development Fund.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Veterinary Microbiology and Pathology, Bustad Hall, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-7040. Phone: (509) 335-6047. Fax: (509)
335-8529. E-mail: baszlert{at}vetmed.wsu.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Atkinson, R.,
P. A. Harper,
M. P. Reichel, and J. T. Ellis.
2000.
Progress in the serodiagnosis of Neospora caninum infections of cattle.
Parasitol. Today
16:110-114[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Barling, K. S.,
J. W. McNeill,
J. A. Thompson,
J. C. Paschal,
F. T. McCollum,
T. M. Craig, and L. G. Adams.
2000.
Association of serologic status for Neospora caninum with postweaning weight gain and carcass measurements in beef calves.
J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc.
217:1356-1360[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Barr, B. C.,
M. L. Anderson,
P. C. Blanchard,
B. M. Daft,
H. Kinde, and P. A. Conrad.
1990.
Bovine fetal encephalitis and myocarditis associated with protozoal infections.
Vet. Pathol.
27:354-361[Abstract].
|
| 4.
|
Baszler, T. V.,
L. J. Gay,
M. T. Long, and B. A. Mathison.
1999.
Detection by PCR of Neospora caninum in fetal tissues from spontaneous bovine abortions.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
37:4059-4064[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Baszler, T. V.,
D. P. Knowles,
J. P. Dubey,
J. M. Gay,
B. A. Mathison, and T. F. McElwain.
1996.
Serological diagnosis of bovine neosporosis by Neospora caninum monoclonal antibody-based competitive inhibition enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
34:1423-1428[Abstract].
|
| 6.
|
Bjorkman, C.,
O. J. Holmdahl, and A. Uggla.
1997.
An indirect enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA) for demonstration of antibodies to Neospora caninum in serum and milk of cattle.
Vet. Parasitol.
68:251-260[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Bjorkman, C.,
K. Naslund,
S. Stenlund,
S. W. Maley,
D. Buxton, and A. Uggla.
1999.
An IgG avidity ELISA to discriminate between recent and chronic Neospora caninum infection.
J. Vet. Diagn. Investig.
11:41-44[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Bjorkman, C., and A. Uggla.
1999.
Serological diagnosis of Neospora caninum infection.
Int. J. Parasitol.
29:1497-1507[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 9.
|
De Marez, T.,
S. Liddell,
J. P. Dubey,
M. C. Jenkins, and L. Gasbarre.
1999.
Oral infection of calves with Neospora caninum oocysts from dogs: humoral and cellular immune responses.
Int. J. Parasitol.
29:1647-1657[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Dubey, J. P.
1999.
Neosporosis in cattle: biology and economic impact.
J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc.
214:1160-1163[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Dubey, J. P.,
A. L. Hattel,
D. S. Lindsay, and M. J. Topper.
1988.
Neonatal Neospora caninum infection in dogs: isolation of the causative agent and experimental transmission.
J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc.
193:1259-1263[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Jacobson, R.
2000.
Principles of validation of diagnostic assays for infectious diseases, p. 15-23.
In
OIE manual of standards for diagnostic tests and vaccines, 4th ed. Office International Des Epizooties, World Organization for Animal Health, Paris, France.
|
| 13.
|
Lindsay, D. S., and J. P. Dubey.
1989.
Immunohistochemical diagnosis of Neospora caninum in tissue sections.
Am. J. Vet. Res.
50:1981-1983[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Lindsay, D. S.,
J. P. Dubey, and R. B. Duncan.
1999.
Confirmation that the dog is a definitive host for Neospora caninum.
Vet. Parasitol.
82:327-333[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Lindsay, D. S.,
S. D. Lenz,
R. A. Cole,
J. P. Dubey, and B. L. Blagburn.
1995.
Mouse model for central nervous system Neospora caninum infections.
J. Parasitol.
81:313-315[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Long, M. T.,
T. V. Baszler, and B. A. Mathison.
1998.
Comparison of intracerebral parasite load, lesion development, and systemic cytokines in mouse strains infected with Neospora caninum.
J. Parasitol.
84:316-320[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Louie, K.,
K. W. Sverlow,
B. C. Barr,
M. L. Anderson, and P. A. Conrad.
1997.
Cloning and characterization of two recombinant Neospora protein fragments and their use in serodiagnosis of bovine neosporosis.
Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol.
4:692-699[Abstract].
|
| 18.
|
McAllister, M. M.,
J. P. Dubey,
D. S. Lindsay,
W. R. Jolley,
R. A. Wills, and A. M. McGuire.
1998.
Dogs are definitive hosts of Neospora caninum.
Int. J. Parasitol.
28:1473-1478[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Otter, A.,
M. Jeffrey,
S. F. Scholes,
B. Helmick,
J. W. Wilesmith, and A. J. Trees.
1997.
Comparison of histology with maternal and fetal serology for the diagnosis of abortion due to bovine neosporosis.
Vet. Rec.
141:487-489[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Packham, A. E.,
K. W. Sverlow,
P. A. Conrad,
E. F. Loomis,
J. D. Rowe,
M. L. Anderson,
A. E. Marsh,
C. Cray, and B. C. Barr.
1998.
A modified agglutination test for Neospora caninum: development, optimization, and comparison to the indirect fluorescent-antibody test and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol.
5:467-473[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Pare, J.,
S. K. Hietala, and M. C. Thurmond.
1995.
An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for serological diagnosis of Neospora sp. infection in cattle.
J. Vet. Diagn. Investig.
7:352-359[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Schares, G.,
M. Rauser,
P. Sondgen,
P. Rehberg,
A. Barwald,
J. P. Dubey,
R. Edelhofer, and F. J. Conraths.
2000.
Use of purified tachyzoite surface antigen p38 in an ELISA to diagnose bovine neosporosis.
Int. J. Parasitol.
30:1123-1130[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Thurmond, M. C., and S. K. Hietala.
1996.
Culling associated with Neospora caninum infection in dairy cows.
Am. J. Vet. Res.
57:1559-1562[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Thurmond, M. C., and S. K. Hietala.
1997.
Effect of Neospora caninum infection on milk production in first-lactation dairy cows.
J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc.
210:672-674[Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Thurmond, M. C.,
S. K. Hietala, and P. C. Blanchard.
1997.
Herd-based diagnosis of Neospora caninum-induced endemic and epidemic abortion in cows and evidence for congenital and postnatal transmission.
J. Vet. Diagn. Investig.
9:44-49[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Waldner, C. L.,
E. D. Janzen, and C. S. Ribble.
1998.
Determination of the association between Neospora caninum infection and reproductive performance in beef herds.
J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc.
213:685-690[Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Williams, D. J.,
H. C. Davison,
B. Helmick,
J. McGarry,
F. Guy,
A. Otter, and A. J. Trees.
1999.
Evaluation of a commercial ELISA for detecting serum antibody to Neospora caninum in cattle.
Vet. Rec.
145:571-575[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Wouda, W.,
J. Brinkhof,
C. van Maanen,
A. L. de Gee, and A. R. Moen.
1998.
Serodiagnosis of neosporosis in individual cows and dairy herds: a comparative study of three enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays.
Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol.
5:711-716[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Wouda, W.,
A. R. Moen,
I. J. Visser, and F. van Knapen.
1997.
Bovine fetal neosporosis: a comparison of epizootic and sporadic abortion cases and different age classes with regard to lesion severity and immunohistochemical identification of organisms in brain, heart, and liver.
J. Vet. Diagn. Investig.
9:180-185[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, November 2001, p. 3851-3857, Vol. 39, No. 11
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.11.3851-3857.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Ghalmi, F., China, B., Kaidi, R., Losson, B.
(2009). Evaluation of a SRS2 sandwich commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of anti-Neospora caninum antibodies in bovine and canine sera. jvdi
21: 108-111
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Baszler, T. V., Shkap, V., Mwangi, W., Davies, C. J., Mathison, B. A., Mazuz, M., Resnikov, D., Fish, L., Leibovitch, B., Staska, L. M., Savitsky, I.
(2008). Bovine Immune Response to Inoculation with Neospora caninum Surface Antigen SRS2 Lipopeptides Mimics Immune Response to Infection with Live Parasites. CVI
15: 659-667
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Staska, L. M., Davies, C. J., Brown, W. C., McGuire, T. C., Suarez, C. E., Park, J. Y., Mathison, B. A., Abbott, J. R., Baszler, T. V.
(2005). Identification of Vaccine Candidate Peptides in the NcSRS2 Surface Protein of Neospora caninum by Using CD4+ Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes and Gamma Interferon-Secreting T Lymphocytes of Infected Holstein Cattle. Infect. Immun.
73: 1321-1329
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Staska, L. M., McGuire, T. C., Davies, C. J., Lewin, H. A., Baszler, T. V.
(2003). Neospora caninum-Infected Cattle Develop Parasite-Specific CD4+ Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes. Infect. Immun.
71: 3272-3279
[Abstract]
[Full Text]