Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, November 2001, p. 3962-3968, Vol. 39, No. 11
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.11.3962-3968.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Characterization of Salmonella
Associated with Pig Ear Dog Treats in Canada
Clifford
Clark,1,*
Jane
Cunningham,2
Rafiq
Ahmed,1
David
Woodward,1
Kevin
Fonseca,2
Sandy
Isaacs,3
Andrea
Ellis,3
Chandar
Anand,2
Kim
Ziebell,4
Anne
Muckle,4
Paul
Sockett,3 and
Frank
Rodgers1
National Laboratory for Enteric Pathogens,
National Microbiology Laboratory, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3E
3R21; Provincial Laboratory or Public
Health for Southern Alberta, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N
4W42; Division of Enteric Foodborne and
Waterborne Diseases, Centre for Infectious Disease Control and
Prevention, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0L23;
and Laboratory for Foodborne Zoonoses, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
N1G 3W44
Received 19 June 2001/Returned for modification 24 July
2001/Accepted 29 August 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
In the summer of 1999, the incidence of Salmonella
enterica serotype Infantis infections in Alberta rose
dramatically. Subsequent laboratory and epidemiological investigations
established that an outbreak of human disease caused by this organism
was occurring across Canada and was associated with pet treats for dogs
produced from processed pig ears. Laboratory investigations using phage typing and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) established that
isolates of Salmonella serotype Infantis from pig ear
pet treats and humans exposed to pig ear pet treats comprised a
well-defined subset of all isolates analyzed. Of the 53 subtypes of
Salmonella serotype Infantis obtained around the time of
the outbreak as defined by PFGE and phage typing, only 6 subtypes were
associated with both human infection and isolation from pig ears.
Together with information from epidemiological studies, these
investigations established pig ear pet treats as the cause of the
Salmonella serotype Infantis outbreak. The results are
consistent with a model in which contaminated pig ear pet treats
constitute a long-term, continuing vehicle for infection of the human
population rather than causing temporally delimited point-source
outbreaks. During the course of this outbreak, several other
Salmonella serotypes were also isolated from pet treats,
suggesting these products may be an important source of enteric
infection in both humans and dogs. Though isolates of
Salmonella serotypes other than
Salmonella serotype Infantis from pet treats were also
subjected to PFGE and phage typing, no link with human disease could be
definitively established, and the contribution of pig ear pet treats to
human disease remains unclear. Elimination of bacterial contamination from pet treats is required to reduce the risk of infection from these products.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Infections with nontyphoidal
Salmonella enterica serovars are most often the result of
ingestion of contaminated foods and are only rarely attributed to other
causes. Salmonella is the most frequently detected cause of
bacterial illness in parts of Europe and Korea and is the second most
frequently detected cause of bacterial illness in the United States,
England, and Australia (20, 28, 30). The estimated annual
cost of food-borne salmonellosis in the United States is $0.9 to 3.5 billion (3). Around the world, Salmonella is
the most important agent causing food-borne illness, with
Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis and
Salmonella serovar Typhimurium predominating
(28). In Canada, Salmonella serotype
Typhimurium and Salmonella serotype Enteritidis have also
caused a majority of cases of sporadic diseases and are responsible for
most outbreaks due to Salmonella since 1983 (5, 6, 8, 14-18). While other serotypes, including Salmonella
serotypes Heidelberg, Hadar, Agona, Infantis, Thompson, and Newport,
are important causes of human disease in Canada, for the most part
these organisms are thought to be acquired through ingestion of
contaminated food (11, 18). The characterization of a
Salmonella serotype Infantis outbreak in Canada in 1999 (P. N. Sockett et al., unpublished data) led to the identification
of pet treats produced from pig ears as a common source of human
illness for many of the outbreak cases, suggesting that there are
alternate ways for these bacteria to infect the human population.
Salmonella serotype Infantis is a pathogen of both humans
and animals. This organism has caused outbreaks of human disease in
England (2), Finland (12), the United States
(21), and Canada (23), and isolates of
Salmonella serotype Infantis have been recovered from pigs
in Africa (22). A Danish surveillance program for
Salmonella in fresh meat, instituted after an epidemic of
Salmonella serotype Infantis in 1993 in that country, found 3.1% of pork cuts were contaminated with Salmonella
serotype Infantis (27). In Finland, Salmonella
serotype Infantis has been isolated frequently from chickens and cattle
and is the third most common cause of human salmonellosis (24,
29). Isolates from a cattle outbreak of Salmonella
serotype Infantis associated with contaminated feed in Finland were
analyzed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), plasmid analysis,
ribotyping, and IS200 typing (19).
Salmonella serotype Infantis has been among the top 10 Salmonella serovars from humans in Canada characterized by
the National Laboratory for Enteric Pathogens (NLEP) in recent years
(5, 6,14-17), ranking second as a cause of human illness
in Canada in 1983 and then decreasing to consistently rank sixth or
seventh by the early 1990s (18). This was accompanied by a
corresponding decrease in prevalence in nonhuman isolates during this
time. Illness due to this organism has been seen in all provinces,
although more than half of the human cases identified from 1993 through 1996 were from Ontario, Canada. In the absence of identified outbreaks, it has been difficult to trace the source of human infection by this organism.
In this study, we describe the typing and fingerprinting methods used
to characterize isolates from pet treats associated with the
Salmonella serotype Infantis outbreak in Canada in 1999. The
results indicate that contact with pet treats made from pig ears or
with dogs who had eaten these pet treats was the predominant cause of
recent human Salmonella serotype Infantis illness. A variety
of other pet treats were also contaminated with additional Salmonella serotypes. Although none of these isolates
appeared to be associated with specific outbreaks, the disease burden
in terms of sporadic cases due to serotypes other than
Salmonella serotype Infantis to human disease is not known.
Possible reasons for the predominance of Salmonella serotype
Infantis in the present outbreak remain to be determined.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Bacterial isolates.
Bacterial isolates were obtained from a
number of provincial government and private laboratories across Canada.
Isolates were forwarded either to the NLEP in Winnipeg, Manitoba,
Canada, or to the Laboratory for Foodborne Zoonoses in Guelph, Ontario,
Canada. After subculture, strains were prepared for long-term storage by inoculation onto slants of Institut Pasteur maintenance medium or
were frozen at
80°C in brain heart infusion broth containing 15%
(vol/vol) glycerol.
Bacterial strains used for analysis included Salmonella
serotype Infantis isolates from humans gathered during the outbreak period (December 1998 to September 1999) as well as two animal isolates
collected in 1998. These strains included 99 isolates from humans
collected from all Canadian provinces except Newfoundland. They also
included 48 pig or pig ear isolates from Alberta, Saskatchewan, Ontario, Québec, Newfoundland, and Nova Scotia; 6 poultry
isolates from Alberta; and animal isolates from bovine stool (Alberta), an iguana (New Brunswick), and two unspecified animal sources. All but
2 of the 157 specimens analyzed were isolated in 1999.
Isolation and characterization of Salmonella.
Salmonella was isolated from human stool and urine samples
in hospital laboratories by standard methods. During the outbreak investigation, screening of pet treats and animal products for Salmonella was conducted at Provincial Laboratories of
Public Health, the Canadian Food Inspection Agency laboratories, and private laboratories by methods established by the Canadian Health Protection Branch (7, 26).
Salmonella isolates were characterized biochemically
(9) and were initially confirmed with commercially
available somatic polyvalent and monovalent antisera. Confirmation of
the serotyping reactions (13, 25) was performed using a
full set of polyclonal absorbed rabbit antiserum prepared and
standardized by the NLEP.
Phage typing.
All Salmonella strains isolated
were phage typed when appropriate using schemes developed at the
Central Public Health Laboratory, Colindale, United Kingdom, and at the
NLEP, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada (1; R. Khakhria, D. Duck,
and H. Lior, Conjoint Meet. Inf. Dis., abstr. BC = 26, 1982).
PFGE.
PFGE was done according to previously described
protocols (4, 10), summarized as follows. Bacteria grown
overnight in brain heart infusion broth were collected by
centrifugation, washed in TE wash buffer (100 mM Tris [pH 8.0], 100 mM EDTA), and suspended in TE wash buffer to give a density reading of
0.50 with a Dade turbidity meter. Proteinase K was added to washed
cells, which were then directly embedded in 1.2% SeaKem Gold agarose
(Mandel Scientific Co., Guelph, Ontario, Canada) prepared with TE
buffer (10 mM Tris [pH 8.0], 1 mM EDTA) containing 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate. Solidified plugs were transferred to 1.5 ml of lysis buffer
(50 mM Tris [pH 8.0], 50 mM EDTA, 1% sarcosine, 0.5 mg of proteinase
K/ml) and incubated at 54°C in a water bath with shaking at 150 rpm
for 2 h. Plugs were washed twice at 50°C with distilled water
(18 M
quality) and then washed three times for 15 min with TE buffer
with shaking. Plug slices were equilibrated in 100 µl of buffer H
(Roche Diagnostics, Laval, Quebec, Canada) at 37°C for 15 min and
digested at 37°C for 2 h with 80 U of XbaI in 100 µl of fresh buffer H. Selected isolates were also restricted with
SpeI. After digestion, plugs were equilibrated in 0.5× TBE containing 0.89 M Tris, 0.89 M boric acid, and 0.02 M disodium EDTA (pH
8.4) (Roche Diagnostics) for 5 min. Electrophoresis was performed with
the CHEF DR III unit (Bio-Rad Laboratories Canada, Ltd., Mississauga,
Ontario, Canada) in 1% PFGE agarose at 14°C. Initial and final
switch times were 2.2 and 63.8 s, respectively, and the total run
time was 22 h. Following electrophoresis the gels were stained
with ethidium bromide (0.5 µg/ml) and imaged with the Alpha Imager
2000 (Canberra Packard Canada, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada). The
interpretation of the PFGE patterns was aided by use of Molecular
Analyst Software Fingerprinting PLUS, version 1.6 (Applied Maths,
Kortrijk, Belgium). All associations obtained using these software
packages were checked visually by at least two people. For the isolates
analyzed in this study, each unique pattern was given its own number.
Dendrograms were created using the unweighted pair group method with
arithmetric means within the Molecular Analyst software.
 |
RESULTS |
Isolation of Salmonella spp. from humans and dog
treats.
Of 94 pig ear samples obtained from retail outlets at the
time of the investigation, 48 (51%) were positive for
Salmonella. Other retail products tested at this time
included treats containing lamb, turkey, or beef products and those
labeled as beef chew, rawhide, chew stick, beef hoof, braided chew,
lamb chunks, hoof delight, and roulé rôti, or just
"pet treats." Several (15 of 39, or 38%) of these treats also
contained Salmonella. In addition to retail products, pig
ears and other pet treats or animal parts were obtained directly from
production plants during the investigation. Salmonella was
found in products from 5 of the 12 plants investigated in Alberta,
Manitoba, Ontario, Québec, and New Brunswick and was found in
plants from three of the five provinces. Overall, 49 of 171 (29%) of
pig ear pet treats from these plants contained Salmonella; 7 other pet treat products (as listed above) were also contaminated with
Salmonella. Some products contained as many as four
different serotypes of Salmonella, although the relative levels of each serotype in these products were not determined.
Molecular typing of Salmonella serotype Infantis:
evidence for transmission of bacteria from pig ear dog treats to
humans.
Phage typing and PFGE using XbaI and
SpeI were used to discriminate among isolates confirmed as
Salmonella serotype Infantis by biochemical testing and
serological identification (Table 1). Nine phage types (PTs) were found among the strains tested, as well as one isolate that gave an atypical phage typing pattern and
another that was untypeable (Table 2). Of
the 156 isolates tested by phage typing, 96 (62%) were PT 4, and 20 (13%) were PT 26. Together, these two PTs accounted for 116 (74%) of
all isolates tested. PT 4 isolates comprised 53% of isolates from human patients, 85% of isolates from pig ears, and approximately one-third of the isolates from chickens. Other PTs were found in
isolates from a more restricted number of hosts: PT 3 and PT 7 in
isolates from humans and pigs, PT 8 in isolates from humans and an
iguana, PT 9 in isolates from humans and chickens, and PTs 10, 13, and
29 in humans only.
PFGE of Salmonella serotype Infantis isolates using
XbaI demonstrated 41 types with patterns differing by one or
more bands (Table 2). Forty isolates were tested using SpeI
restriction digestion for PFGE, but no additional discrimination was
obtained. As the distribution of patterns obtained using
SpeI correlated well with the XbaI patterns,
XbaI was used for all further analysis. PFGE patterns 1 and
3 comprised 41 of 99 (41%) of human isolates and 25 of 48 (52%) of
isolates obtained from pigs or pig ear dog treats. These patterns
differed by three bands (Fig. 1) and were widely separated in the dendrogram shown in Fig.
2, exhibiting relatedness of less than
80%. PFGE pattern 1 was more closely related to patterns 2, 3, 4, and
7, while patterns 3 and 6 were closely related (Fig. 2).

View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
PFGE profiles of Salmonella serotype
Infantis strains restriction enzyme digested with XbaI
showing representative PFGE patterns. Lanes 1, 5, 10, and 15 contained
the Salmonella serotype Newport standard strain
AM01144.
|
|
Most (four of six) of the poultry isolates had PFGE pattern 13, which
was also found in isolates from humans who did not have exposure to pig
ears (Table 2). Unique PFGE XbaI patterns were found in the
remaining two poultry isolates (patterns 17 and 18) and a bovine
isolate (pattern 38). Relationships among PFGE XbaI patterns
are summarized in Fig. 2.
A combination of PT and XbaI PFGE types was used to further
assess relationships among the isolates tested. Though other methods, such as randomly amplified polymorphic DNA analysis, were used to
investigate strain variability, they were much less discriminatory than
PFGE or phage typing and were not used to assign specific types. There
were 53 types that differed by PT and at least one band in PFGE
XbaI macrorestriction patterns. A limited number of types
were found in both humans and pigs (Table 1). Type 1 and 3 isolates
constituted the two most prevalent types found in human disease. Most
human strains with these characteristic types were found in Alberta (19 isolates), although lower numbers were also found from human cases in
British Columbia (6), Saskatchewan (1),
Manitoba (2), Ontario (4), Québec
(7), and Prince Edward Island (2). Type 1 and
4 strains were found in animals or pig ear dog treats from Alberta (15 isolates), Saskatchewan (2), and Nova Scotia
(2). Further investigations are being carried out to
determine whether isolates having the same PTs and PFGE types were also
present in other provinces.
Strains isolated from human cases with PFGE pattern 19 and PT 8 were
very similar to a human strain with PFGE pattern 19 and PT 29 and a pig
ear dog treat-associated strain with PFGE pattern 19 and PT 3, differing only by PT but having an identical PFGE type. All three types
were found only in Québec.
Most types found were from strains isolated only from pig ear dog
treats or only from humans. Human isolates with types unrelated to
those found in pig ear dog treats yielded 31 PFGE types (Table 2). PFGE
analysis subdivided most PTs into several groups, and several PFGE
patterns were shared by two or more PTs (Table
3).
Salmonella serotype Infantis was the serotype most often
isolated from pig ear pet treats, comprising 18% of all isolates obtained (Table 4). Salmonella
serotype Infantis was also isolated more frequently than other
serotypes from pet treats other than pig ear pet treats, comprising
28% of the total isolates obtained. The two serotypes with similar but
slightly reduced frequencies were Salmonella serotype
Typhimurium (11%) and Salmonella serotype Derby (10%); all
other serotypes were isolated much less frequently from pig ear pet
treats. Salmonella serotype Banana and Salmonella serotype Typhimurium var. copenhagen were found in pet treats during
the course of this investigation but were not isolated from humans
during either 1998 or 1999.
Molecular typing of other Salmonella serotypes.
Phage and PFGE typing information are available only for some of the
other serotypes of Salmonella isolated from pig ear pet treats (Table 5). Relatively low numbers
of some serotypes were isolated from humans in Canada in 1998 and 1999. These isolates included the Salmonella serotypes Agoueve,
Banana, Bovis-morbificans, Brandenberg, California, Derby, Havana,
Livingstone, Mbandaka, Meleagridis, Montevideo, Muenster, Ohio, Panama,
Schwarzengrund, and Uganda. PFGE was not done with human isolates of
these serotypes unless they were involved in outbreaks of human disease
during the course of the year. Pig ear pet treat isolates of a few
serotypes were analyzed by phage typing and by PFGE to give baseline
data for future comparisons with human isolates (see Table 5).
The E1 PFGE pattern of an environmental Salmonella serotype
Muenchen strain obtained from a packing plant that produced pig ear pet
treats was quite different from the A1, A2, B1, B2, C1, and D1 patterns
previously found among human isolates of this organism. Both the PT and
PFGE type of Salmonella serotype Agona from pig ear pet
treats were distinct from types characteristic of human strains (Table
5). Similarly, while B1, B2, B3, and C3 PFGE patterns were found in
four pig ear isolates of Salmonella serotype Worthington,
only one human strain isolated in British Columbia in 1999 carried
the B1 pattern. Seven other human isolates associated with a
previous outbreak in British Columbia had the A1 PFGE pattern. There is
no convincing evidence that pig ear pet treats are associated
with human disease caused by these organisms.
Salmonella serotype Typhimurium PFGE types 1, 2, 3, and 4 have been isolated from pig ear dog treats obtained from Toronto, Ontario (types 1 and 2), Halifax, Nova Scotia (types 3 and 4), and
Calgary, Alberta (type 3). Strains with PFGE type 3 have been isolated
recently from a number of patients in Mississauga, Ontario, while those
with PFGE type 1 have been isolated from patients in British Columbia.
Isolates with the PFGE type 1 pattern were also obtained recently from
samples of cheese found in Toronto. Interestingly, some of the
Salmonella serotype Typhimurium isolated from pig ear dog
treats were definitive type (DT) 104 strains exhibiting the
ACSSuT multiple antibiotic resistance phenotype.
A single strain of Salmonella serotype Heidelberg PT 19 and
PFGE type 1 was isolated in Calgary from pig ear pet treats. This combination of types was found in a large number of
Salmonella serotype Heidelberg isolates from British
Columbia and from other sources. PFGE type 1 is the predominant pattern
detected by the NLEP and may be carried by the majority of
Salmonella serotype Heidelberg strains. Strains with both PT
19 and PFGE type 1 are less prevalent.
 |
DISCUSSION |
The evidence presented here indicates that pig ears and other pig
products are a potential source of human infection by many serotypes of
Salmonella. Though pet treats made from pig ears and other
porcine products were contaminated with many different kinds of
bacteria, only Salmonella serotype Infantis was identified as causing an increased number of human infections. While the reasons
for this are not clear, it may be that this organism was more virulent
or was present in higher numbers in the pet products; however,
quantitative assessments of Salmonella serotype Infantis in
these products were not made. A second possibility is that Salmonella serotype Infantis grows better in dogs than other
serotypes, thus serving to amplify the organism, and that dogs are an
intermediate source of infection for many humans. During the outbreak,
infection occurred in patients whose sole exposure was to pig ears. Few isolations from dogs were attempted, though case reports suggested that
dogs become sick as a result of exposure to pet treats. It is not clear
that methods currently available would be adequate for this kind of
analysis. Identifying the absolute numbers of bacteria contaminating
these treats may be of limited value until the role of dogs in
amplifying pathogen numbers and causing infection is understood.
Salmonella serotype Infantis characterized in this study
constituted a diverse group of organisms. Isolates from humans showed considerable variation in their PFGE patterns and PTs, and in some
cases particular types may be associated with specific sources or
routes of infection. The presence of identical PFGE and PTs in strains
of Salmonella serotype Infantis associated with both humans
and pig ear pet treats supports the idea that pig ear pet treats were
the original source of these strains. Pigs and pig ear pet treats
appeared to be contaminated with a limited variety of
Salmonella serotype Infantis PFGE and PTs, suggesting that limited type diversity is not a likely reason for the isolation of
identical PTs and PFGE types from both pig ear dog treats and humans.
The prolonged outbreak of Salmonella serotype Infantis appeared to result from multiple introductions of the organism into
pigs or pig ears and from there into the human population, rather than
introduction of bacteria from a point source. Support for this premise
comes from the fact that the PFGE patterns 1 and 3 responsible for most
of the human cases are widely separated in the dendrogram of
Salmonella serotype Infantis patterns and have less than
80% pattern similarity.
A single pig ear isolate with a PFGE type 19 pattern was found in
Québec, where there were also a number of isolates from human
patients with identical PFGE patterns. The finding of these and closely
related types only in Québec suggests a possible route of
transmission from pet treats to humans specific for this area and
indicates that there may be regional differences in the Salmonella serotype Infantis types contaminating these
treats. It is possible that the prevalence of the type 1 and 3 patterns among Salmonella serotype Infantis isolates from humans
largely reflects the distribution of pet treats from suppliers in
western Canada throughout the rest of the country (Sockett et al., unpublished).
Salmonella serotype Infantis is present in pigs, poultry,
chicken eggs, cattle, and animal feeds. In 1996, Salmonella
serotype Infantis of animal origin was predominantly recovered from
pork or pork products, especially in Québec and Prince Edward
Island (14). Very few isolates of this organism were found
in pork in 1995 (15). Poultry, especially in Ontario, was
the predominant source of nonhuman Salmonella serotype
Infantis in 1993 and 1994 (16, 17). Interestingly, a
single isolate of Salmonella serotype Infantis was obtained
from dog snacks in 1994, although not in 1995 or 1996. It is not clear
how this pathogen emerged in pork, though its present prevalence seems
to be relatively recent.
Both PFGE and phage typing were required for an adequate description of
the strain characteristics of all Salmonella serotypes analyzed in this study. Phage typing discriminated among most of the
Salmonella serotype Infantis PFGE types and less frequently among PFGE types of other Salmonella serotypes. PFGE
similarly subdivided PTs of most Salmonella serotypes
tested. It is important to note that pentaresistant
Salmonella serotype Typhimurium DT 104 was isolated from pig
ears, suggesting that this may constitute a source of human infection
with this organism as well.
The sharp increase in the numbers of Salmonella serotype
Infantis infections is a recent trend in human infection, and dog treats may have contributed to this increase. Clearly, the causal relationship between human cases and pig ear dog treats was clarified by molecular typing, which also served as the trigger for an
epidemiological investigation of this outbreak. Comprehensive and
detailed descriptions of the phenotypic, genetic, and molecular
fingerprint characteristics of the Salmonella isolates
associated with pig ear pet treats are necessary to evaluate the
effects of interventions designed to eliminate these treats as a source
of human infection. For instance, the fact that phage typing and PFGE
appear to measure biological traits that vary independently of each
other suggests that the use of both methods is necessary for adequate
typing of related isolates. The laboratory and epidemiological
components of the National Enteric Surveillance Program for enteric
bacteria currently track trends in Salmonella infections
throughout Canada to evaluate the effect of such interventions and to
determine the contribution of pig ear pet treats to the disease burden.
Pig ears and other dog treats from similar sources, produced under
similar conditions, may have been a continuing source of human disease
for quite some time and may have contributed to the background of
sporadic cases seen in Canada and elsewhere. Continued epidemiological
and laboratory monitoring of changes in the background of sporadic
human cases, especially of uncommon serotypes, will further define the
scope of the problem.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank the staff of the provincial Public Health Laboratories,
the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA), and MAPAQ, who provided
initially characterized isolates to the NLEP along with information
from plant inspections and analysis of retail samples. We also thank
Karen Grimsrud, Linda Chui, Shelley Johnson, Walter Demczuk, and
Jennifer Campbell for their valuable contributions to the
epidemiological and laboratory investigations.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: National
Laboratory for Enteric Pathogens, National Microbiology Laboratory,
1015 Arlington St., Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3E 3R2. Phone: (204)
789-2094. Fax: (204) 789-5012. E-mail:
Clifford_Clark{at}hc-sc.gc.ca.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Anderson, E. S., and R. E. O. Williams.
1956.
Bacteriophage typing of enteric pathogens and Staphylococci and its use in epidemiology.
J. Clin. Pathol.
9:94-127.
|
| 2.
|
Barrell, R. A. E.
1987.
Isolation of Salmonella from human foods in the Manchester area.
Epidemiol. Infect.
98:277-284[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Buzby, J. C., and T. Roberts.
1997.
Economic costs and trade impacts of microbial foodborne illness.
World Health Stat. Q.
50:57-66[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
1998.
Standardized molecular subtyping of foodborne bacterial pathogens by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.
The National Molecular Subtyping Network for Foodborne Disease Surveillance. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Ga.
|
| 5.
|
Cuff, W.,
R. Khakhria,
D. L. Woodward,
R. Ahmed,
C. G. Clark, and F. G. Rodgers.
2000.
Enteric pathogens identified in Canada: annual summary 1997.
Laboratory Centre for Disease Control, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
|
| 6.
|
Cuff, W.,
R. Khakhria,
D. L. Woodward,
R. Ahmed,
C. G. Clark, and F. G. Rodgers.
2001.
Enteric pathogens identified in Canada: annual summary 1998.
Laboratory Centre for Disease Control, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
|
| 7.
|
D'Aoust, J.-Y., and U. Purvis.
1998.
Isolation and identification of Salmonella from foods. MFHPB-20.
In
D. Warburton (ed.), Compendium of analytical methods. Health Protection Branch, Health Canada. Polyscience Publications, Laval, Quebec, Canada.
|
| 8.
|
Ellis, A.
1999.
National foodborne, waterborne, and enteric outbreak summary report 1997-1998. LCDC report.
Can. J. Infect. Dis.
10:201-206.
|
| 9.
|
Ewing, W. H.
1986.
The genus Salmonella, p. 181-340.
In
Edwards and Ewings's identification of Enterobacteriaceae, 4th ed. Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc., New York, N.Y.
|
| 10.
|
Gautom, R. K.
1997.
Rapid pulsed-field gel electrophoresis protocol for typing of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and other gram-negative organisms in 1 day.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
35:2977-2980[Abstract].
|
| 11.
|
Gomez, T. M.,
Y. Motarjemi,
S. Miyagawa,
F. K. Käferstein, and K. Stöhr.
1997.
Foodborne salmonellosis.
World Health Stat. Q.
50:81-89[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Hatakka, M.
1992.
Salmonella outbreak among railway and airline passengers.
Acta Vet. Scand.
33:253-260[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Kauffman, F.
1966.
The bacteriology of Enterobacteriaceae.
The Williams & Wilkins Co., Baltimore, Md.
|
| 14.
|
Khakhria, R.,
D. Woodward,
W. Cuff,
F. Rodgers, and W. Johnson.
1999.
Enteric pathogens identified in Canada: annual summary 1996.
Laboratory Centre for Disease Control, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
|
| 15.
|
Khakhria, R.,
D. Woodward, and W. Johnson.
1997.
Salmonellae, shigellae, pathogenic E. coli, campylobacters and Aeromonas identified in Canada: annual summary 1995.
Laboratory Centre for Disease Control, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
|
| 16.
|
Khakhria, R.,
D. Woodward, and W. Johnson.
1996.
Salmonellae, shigellae, pathogenic E. coli, campylobacters and Aeromonas identified in Canada: annual summary 1994.
Laboratory Centre for Disease Control, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
|
| 17.
|
Khakhria, R.,
D. Woodward, and W. Johnson.
1995.
Salmonellae, shigellae, pathogenic E. coli, campylobacters and Aeromonas identified in Canada: annual summary 1993.
Laboratory Centre for Disease Control, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
|
| 18.
|
Khakhria, R.,
D. Woodward,
W. M. Johnson, and C. Poppe.
1997.
Salmonella isolated from humans, animals, and other sources in Canada, 1982-92.
Epidemiol. Infect.
119:15-23[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Lindqvist, N.,
S. Heinikainen,
A.-M. Toivonen, and S. Pelkonen.
1999.
Discrimination between endemic and feedborne Salmonella Infantis infection in cattle by molecular typing.
Epidemiol. Infect.
122:497-504[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Mead, P. S.,
L. Slutsker,
V. Dietz,
L. F. McCaig,
J. S. Bresee,
C. Shapiro,
P. M. Griffin, and R. V. Tauxe.
1999.
Food-related illness and death in the United States.
Emerg. Infect. Dis.
5:607-625[Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Meehan, P. J.,
T. Atkeson,
D. E. Kepner, and M. Melton.
1992.
A foodborne outbreak of gastroenteritis involving two different pathogens.
Am. J. Epidemiol.
136:611-616[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Ngoma, M.,
G. S. Pandey,
A. Suzuki,
G. Sato, and H. Chimana.
1996.
Prevalence of Salmonella in apparently healthy slaughtered cattle and pigs in Zambia.
Indian J. Anim. Health
35:197-200.
|
| 23.
|
Page, W. E.,
V. Shimes, and L. Vair.
1988.
Salmonella infantis in a hospital obstetrical department Ontario.
Canada Dis. Wkly. Rep.
14:42-43.
|
| 24.
|
Pelkonen, S.,
E.-L. Romppanen,
A. Siitonen, and J. Pelkonen.
1994.
Differentiation of Salmonella serovar Infantis isolates from human and animal sources by fingerprinting IS200 and 16S rrn loci.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
32:2128-2133[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Popoff, M. Y., and L. LeMinor.
1992.
Antigenic formulas of the Salmonella serovars
In
W. H. O. Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Salmonella., 6th ed. Institut Pasteur, Paris, France.
|
| 26.
|
Poppe, C., and E. D. Mann.
1998.
Procedure for the isolation of Salmonella species by the modified semi-solid Rappaport Vassiliadis (MSRV) method. MFLP-75.
In
D. Warburton (ed.), Compendium of analytical methods. Health Protection Branch, Health Canada. Polyscience Publications, Laval, Québec, Canada.
|
| 27.
|
Sørensen, L. L., and F. Bager.
1995.
Salmonella forekomst i svinekød 1993-1994.
Dansk Veterinærtidsskr.
78:159-162.
|
| 28.
|
Todd, E. C.
1997.
Epidemiology of foodborne diseases: a worldwide review.
World Health Stat. Q.
50:30-50[Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Vasa, M.
1984.
Epidemiological aspects of Salmonella infantis and Salmonella typhi infections in Finnish broiler chickens.
Nord. Vet. Med.
36:317-323[Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Wheeler, J. G.,
D. Sethi,
J. M. Cowden,
P. G. Wall,
L. C. Rodrigues,
D. S. Tomkins,
M. J. Hudson, and P. J. Roderick.
1999.
Study of infectious intestinal disease in England: rates in the community, presenting to general practice, and reported to national surveillance. The Infectious Intestinal Disease Study Executive.
Br. Med. J.
318:1046-1050[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, November 2001, p. 3962-3968, Vol. 39, No. 11
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.11.3962-3968.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Apanavicius, C. J., Powell, K. L., Vester, B. M., Karr-Lilienthal, L. K., Pope, L. L., Fastinger, N. D., Wallig, M. A., Tappenden, K. A., Swanson, K. S.
(2007). Fructan Supplementation and Infection Affect Food Intake, Fever, and Epithelial Sloughing from Salmonella Challenge in Weanling Puppies. J. Nutr.
137: 1923-1930
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Alvarez, J., Porwollik, S., Laconcha, I., Gisakis, V., Vivanco, A. B., Gonzalez, I., Echenagusia, S., Zabala, N., Blackmer, F., McClelland, M., Rementeria, A., Garaizar, J.
(2003). Detection of a Salmonella enterica Serovar California Strain Spreading in Spanish Feed Mills and Genetic Characterization with DNA Microarrays. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
69: 7531-7534
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
White, D. G., Datta, A., McDermott, P., Friedman, S., Qaiyumi, S., Ayers, S., English, L., McDermott, S., Wagner, D. D., Zhao, S.
(2003). Antimicrobial susceptibility and genetic relatedness of Salmonella serovars isolated from animal-derived dog treats in the USA. J Antimicrob Chemother
52: 860-863
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Pitout, J. D. D., Reisbig, M. D., Mulvey, M., Chui, L., Louie, M., Crowe, L., Church, D. L., Elsayed, S., Gregson, D., Ahmed, R., Tilley, P., Hanson, N. D.
(2003). Association between Handling of Pet Treats and Infection with Salmonella enterica Serotype Newport Expressing the AmpC {beta}-Lactamase, CMY-2. J. Clin. Microbiol.
41: 4578-4582
[Abstract]
[Full Text]