Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, February 2001, p. 779-781, Vol. 39, No. 2
Department of Microbiology, Hippokration
General Hospital,1 and Department of
Microbiology, Medical School, Aristotle University of
Thessaloniki,3 Thessaloniki, and
Department of Medical Microbiology, University of
Thessalia, Larissa,2 Greece
Received 28 September 2000/Returned for modification 6 November
2000/Accepted 21 November 2000
Between January and December 1999, in Hippokration General
Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece, a large proportion of the
methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates
(34.4%) exhibited susceptibility to virtually all alternative
non- The increased incidence of
methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in many
countries during the last decades has been accompanied by the
appearance of multidrug-resistant clones, replacing other MRSA lineages
(1). Tobramycin in particular is unlikely to be effective
against MRSA because the gene (aadD) encoding tobramycin and
kanamycin resistance is present within plasmid pUB110, which is
considered a stable part of the mec DNA (3, 6).
Recently, MRSA strains sensitive to gentamicin but resistant to
tobramycin have emerged in French hospitals (5, 7, 8),
while several MRSA strains sensitive to kanamycin have been
occasionally isolated in the United Kingdom; they generally retained
resistance to several alternative antibiotics (16). We
report a hospital outbreak of clinical infections due to MRSA that
exhibits susceptibility to virtually all alternative non- Between January and December 1999, 247 S. aureus isolates
were recovered from clinical infection of separate patients in
Hippokration General Hospital, Thessaloniki, northern Greece.
Identification to species level was performed by using the Vitek
automated system (bioMerieux, Hazelwood, Mo.). MICs of oxacillin and
tobramycin were tested using an agar dilution method (10).
As many as 128 isolates (51.8%) were characterized as MRSA, and a
large proportion of them (44 isolates, 34.4%) were sensitive to
tobramycin (MICs ranged from 0.5 to 1 µg/ml). Twenty-five of the
tobramycin-sensitive isolates were selected randomly for further
testing. These isolates were recovered from clinical samples from
patients hospitalized in nine different departments, including special
intensive-care units (ICUs), and medical, pediatric, and surgery units
(Table 1). Four other
tobramycin-sensitive MRSA isolates, recovered previously in two general
hospitals of Thessaloniki (AHEPA and Agios Dimitrios; Table 1) were
also included in the study.
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.2.779-781.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Nosocomial Spread of an Unusual
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Clone That Is
Sensitive to All Non-
-Lactam Antibiotics, Including
Tobramycin
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
-lactam antibiotics, including tobramycin. Twenty-five of them
were selected randomly for further testing; all belonged to a unique
genotype and were characterized as heterogeneously resistant to
oxacillin. The aadD gene, encoding tobramycin resistance,
failed to be amplified in all cases, indicating absence of the gene or
the entire plasmid pUB110 from the mec DNA.
![]()
TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
-lactam antibiotics, including tobramycin.
TABLE 1.
Characteristics of the 29 multidrug-susceptible Greek
MRSA isolatesc
The 29 tobramycin-sensitive MRSA isolates were tested by an agar dilution method (10) for susceptibility to ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, erythromycin, fusidic acid, gentamicin, kanamycin, nitrofurantoin, rifampin, tetracycline, trimethoprim, and vancomycin. The isolates were also tested for high-level resistance to spectinomycin (500 µg/ml), which has been associated with carriage of transposon Tn554 (12). The methicillin resistance phenotype was further evaluated by the 1-µg oxacillin disk diffusion method using plates containing Mueller-Hinton agar (Difco, Detroit, Mich.) supplemented with 4% NaCl, which were incubated at 37°C for 24 h. The initial classification of the isolates as heterogeneously or homogeneously resistant was confirmed by population analysis profiles using four dilutions of the bacterial cultures (4, 12). The MIC was defined as the lowest concentration of the antibiotic that inhibited 99.9% of the bacterial cells.
PCR was performed for the tobramycin-sensitive MRSA isolates to amplify a 449-bp product within the mecA gene (2). The method was also used for the detection of genes ermA (139-bp product), which is part of transposon Tn554, and aadD (165-bp product), which is part of plasmid pUB110, using published primers (9, 14).
The protocol used for the determination of SmaI macrorestriction patterns was described previously (15). The digested chromosomal DNAs were separated with a contour-clamped homogeneous electric field DRIII apparatus (Bio-Rad, Birmingham, United Kingdom). Concatameric bacteriophage lambda DNA molecules (48.5 kb; Bio-Rad) were used as size standards. Banding patterns of the strains were compared visually according to the criteria proposed by Tenover et al. (13).
The 25 isolates that were recovered from Hippokration Hospital remained
susceptible to ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, erythromycin, fusidic acid,
gentamicin, kanamycin, nitrofurantoin, rifampin, tetracycline,
trimethoprim, and vancomycin. Among the four isolates that were
recovered from two different hospitals in Thessaloniki (Table 1), two
were also susceptible to all non-
-lactam antibiotics; the remaining
two exhibited additional resistance to ciprofloxacin and tetracycline.
The PCR test for the mecA gene was positive in the 29 isolates, while aadD and ermA genes failed to be
amplified in all cases. The isolates were susceptible to spectinomycin
at 500 µg/ml, required a MIC of oxacillin equal to or higher than 16 mg/liter, and were characterized by disk diffusion and population analysis as heterogeneously resistant, belonging to class II or II/III
(12).
SmaI macrorestriction showed that the 25 isolates from
Hippokration Hospital and 2 from AHEPA hospital (Table 1) belonged to a
unique genotype (pattern I; Table 1). The remaining two isolates, which
were recovered from different hospitals (Agios Dimitrios and AHEPA),
exhibited distinct pulsotypes (patterns II and III, respectively; Fig.
1; Table 1). Patterns II and III differed
from each other by only five bands. The isolation of tobramycin-sensitive MRSA in two other tertiary hospitals in our region, two isolates from which exhibited a clonal identity with those
recovered in our hospital, may indicate the geographical spread of this
clone. The common pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) pattern of
the Greek isolates seems to differ substantially from those of other
multidrug-susceptible MRSA clones that have been described previously
(5, 7, 8, 12, 16), although these strains were not run
under the same conditions. However, most of the latter MRSA strains
exhibited resistance to some non-
-lactam antibiotics, such as
ciprofloxacin and tobramycin.
|
Tobramycin seldom retains activity against MRSA because the gene conferring resistance (aadD) is present within plasmid pUB110, which is usually part of the mec DNA (3), although recently mec elements lacking this plasmid have been described (11). pUB110 was integrated during the period when mec DNA was being formed and prior to the emergence of the first outbreaks of MRSA infections in European hospitals in the early 1960s (3). This was the era of pre-MRSA, in which transcription of the mecA gene was strongly repressed by the mecI gene encoding a repressor function. A mutation in the rep gene of pUB110 possibly served for the stabilization of the plasmid after its integration into the chromosome of S. aureus (6). The appearance of MRSA was followed by various patterns of resistance to antibiotics, but tobramycin resistance was consistently recorded (1, 5, 6). In our isolates, aadD failed to be amplified, indicating the absence of the gene or the entire plasmid from the mec DNA. Also, the susceptibility of the isolates to spectinomycin at 500 µg/ml suggested the absence of transposon Tn554, which has been related to resistance to several alternative antibiotics (3).
The MRSA strain of this report has spread into different departments of
a general hospital where antibiotic usage is heavy. This observation
might indicate the virulence of this strain, which survived and became
widespread in the hospital despite its susceptibility to a wide range
of antimicrobials. It should be noted that the antibiotics mainly in
use in this as well as other Greek hospitals are
-lactam-
-lactamase inhibitor combinations, expanded-spectrum
cephalosporins, monobactams, carbapenems, and glycopeptides. The
overuse of most of these drugs might have facilitated the spread of
this MRSA strain.
Multidrug-resistant MRSA has become a major nosocomial pathogen, and vancomycin is at present the antibiotic of choice for systemic infection. However, it is believed that the widespread use of vancomycin in regions with high proportions of MRSA will hasten the emergence of resistance in staphylococci and may also select for vancomycin-resistant enterococci. In view of the intrahospital spread of "new" multidrug-susceptible MRSA clones, we feel that additional therapeutic options are presented and vancomycin usage could be considerably reduced. Also, several of the antibiotics used on less of an intrahospital basis, such as macrolides, tetracyclines, lincosamides, and cotrimoxazole, could be used more extensively. This is of more value for regions such as Greece where the prevalence of MRSA is one of the highest in Europe. Nevertheless, vancomycin might still be the most appropriate agent for life-threatening infections. It has yet to be determined whether dissemination of this particular clone resulted from strains with enhanced virulence or genetic adaptability or from selection caused by changing consumption of antibiotics.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank A. P. Johnson and D. Morrison for helpful discussion.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Microbiology, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54006 Thessaloniki, Greece. Phone: 30 31 99 90 91. Fax: 30 31 99 91 49. E-mail: atsakris{at}med.auth.gr.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Ayliiffe, G. A. J. 1997. The progressive intercontinental spread of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Clin. Infect. Dis. 24(Suppl. 1):S74-S79. |
| 2. |
Bignardi, G. E.,
N. Woodford,
A. Chapman,
A. P. Johnson, and D. C. E. Speller.
1996.
Detection of the mec-A gene and phenotypic detection of resistance in Staphylococcus aureus isolates with borderline or low-level methicillin resistance.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
37:53-63 |
| 3. | Chambers, H. F. 1997. Methicillin resistance in staphylococci: molecular and biochemical basis and clinical implications. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 10:781-791[Abstract]. |
| 4. |
de Lencastre, H.,
A. M. S. Figueiredo,
C. Urban,
J. Rahal, and A. Tomasz.
1991.
Multiple mechanisms of methicillin resistance and improved methods for detection in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
35:632-639 |
| 5. |
Galdbart, J. O.,
A. Morvan, and N. El Solh.
2000.
Phenotypic and molecular typing of nosocomial methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains susceptible to gentamicin isolated in France from 1995 to 1997.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
38:185-190 |
| 6. |
Ito, T.,
Y. Katayama, and K. Hiramatsu.
1999.
Cloning and nucleotide sequence determination of the entire mec DNA of pre-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus N315.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
43:1449-1458 |
| 7. |
Lelievre, H.,
G. Lina,
M. E. Jones,
C. Olive,
F. Forey,
M. Roussel-Delvallez,
M.-H. Nicolas-Chanoine,
C. M. Bebear,
V. Jarlier,
A. Andremont,
F. Vandenesch, and J. Etienne.
1999.
Emergence and spread in French hospitals of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with increasing susceptibility to gentamicin and other antibiotics.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
37:3452-3457 |
| 8. |
Lemaitre, N.,
W. Sougakoff,
A. Masmoudi,
M.-H. Fievet,
R. Bismuth, and V. Jarlier.
1998.
Characterization of gentamicin-susceptible strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus involved in nosocomial spread.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
36:81-85 |
| 9. |
Martineau, F.,
F. J. Picard,
N. Lansac,
C. Menard,
P. H. Roy,
M. Ouellette, and M. G. Bergeron.
2000.
Correlation between the resistance genotype determined by multiplex PCR assays and the antibiotic susceptibility patterns of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
44:231-238 |
| 10. | National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 1997. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically, 4th ed. Approved standard M7-A4. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa. |
| 11. |
Oliveira, D. C.,
S. W. Wu, and H. de Lencastre.
2000.
Genetic organization of the downstream region of the mecA element in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates carrying different polymorphisms of this region.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
44:1906-1910 |
| 12. |
Sa-Leao, R.,
I. Santos Sanches,
D. Dias,
I. Peres,
R. M. Barros, and H. de Lencastre.
1999.
Detection of an archaic clone of Staphylococcus aureus with low-level resistance to methicillin in a pediatric hospital in Portugal and in international samples: relics of a formerly widely disseminated strain?
J. Clin. Microbiol.
37:1913-1920 |
| 13. | Tenover, F. C., R. D. Arbeit, R. V. Goering, P. A. Mickelsen, B. E. Murray, D. H. Persing, and B. Swaminathan. 1995. Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:2233-2239[Medline]. |
| 14. |
van Asselt, G. J.,
J. S. Vliegenthart,
P. L. Petit,
J. A. van de Klundert, and R. P. Mouton.
1992.
High-level aminoglycoside resistance among enterococci and group A streptococci.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
30:651-659 |
| 15. |
van Belkum, A.,
W. van Leeuwen,
M. E. Kaufmann,
B. Cookson,
F. Forey,
J. Etienne,
R. Goering,
F. Tenover,
C. Steward,
F. O'Brien,
W. Grubb,
P. Tassios,
N. Legakis,
A. Morvan,
N. El Solh,
R. de Ryck,
M. Struelens,
S. Salmenlinna,
J. Vuopio-Varkila,
M. Kooistra,
W. Talens,
W. Witte, and H. Verbrugh.
1998.
Assessment of resolution and intercenter reproducibility of results of genotyping Staphylococcus aureus by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of SmaI macrorestriction fragments: a multicenter study.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
36:1653-1659 |
| 16. | Working Party Group. 1998. Revised guidelines for the control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in hospitals. J. Hosp. Infect. 39:253-290[CrossRef][Medline]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. |
|---|---|
| Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |
|---|