Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2001, p. 1618-1621, Vol. 39, No. 4
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.4.1618-1621.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Evaluation of PCR Methods for Rapid Identification
and Differentiation of Streptococcus uberis and
Streptococcus parauberis
A. A.
Hassan,
I. U.
Khan,
A.
Abdulmawjood, and
C.
Lämmler*
Institut für Tierärztliche
Nahrungsmittelkunde, Bakteriologie und Hygiene der Milch, der
Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, Giessen, Germany
Received 4 October 2000/Returned for modification 29 December
2000/Accepted 6 February 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
Streptococcus uberis and Streptococcus
parauberis reference strains and isolates obtained from routine
diagnostics were investigated by PCR with oligonucleotide primers
designed according to species-specific parts of the 16S rRNA gene, the
23S rRNA gene, and the 16S-23S rRNA intergenic spacer region of both
species. All three primer pairs allowed an identification of 67 isolates as S. uberis and 4 isolates as S. parauberis.
 |
TEXT |
The use of PCR as a diagnostic tool
for the detection of bacterial pathogens has become more frequent
during the past few years. The PCR technique allows the amplification
of preselected, species-specific DNA regions which can be used for
genotypic identification of bacteria. A molecule most suited for these
purposes appears to be the gene encoding the 16S rRNA. According to
Bentley et al. (4) and Bentley and Leigh (6),
the sequence variability of the V2 region of the 16S rRNA allows a
differentiation of 31 species of the genus Streptococcus,
including the species S. uberis and S. parauberis. Both species, formerly classified as S. uberis types I and II (19), are well known as
causative agents of bovine mastitis. According to biochemical and
serological characteristics, the two species are almost
indistinguishable (19). A molecular identification of both
species can be performed by analysis of restriction fragment length
polymorphisms (RFLPs) of the 16S rRNA gene (13, 14, 18) or
by the use of species-specific oligonucleotide probes (5,
6). A major disadvantage of these procedures is the additional
manipulation of the samples subsequent to the PCR and the
time-consuming preparation of the gene probes. In the present study,
species-specific regions of the 16S and 23S rRNA genes and the 16S-23S
rRNA intergenic spacer region of S. uberis and S. parauberis were used to construct species-specific oligonucleotide
primers. These oligonucleotide primers were used to identify and
differentiate both species.
A total of 17 S. uberis and 2 S. parauberis
strains were used in this study, all of which were obtained from the
Institute's strain collection. The cultures were identified and
differentiated into both species as described previously (15,
18). In addition, 51 streptococci obtained from routine mastitis
diagnostics and also S. parauberis strain 94/16 were
included. The latter, kindly obtained from J. F. Fernández-Garayzábal (Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad
Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain), was originally isolated from a
diseased turbot (9). The cultures isolated from routine
diagnostics were preliminarily identified as S. uberis by
using conventional methods (15, 16). These methods
included carbohydrate fermentation tests for arabinose, fructose,
inulin, lactose maltose, mannitol, raffinose, ribose, saccharose,
salicin, sorbitol, and trehalose; esculin and sodium hippurate
hydrolysis; determination of arginine hydrolysis; and analysis of
the enzymes
-D-glucuronidase,
pyrrolydonylaminopeptidase, and hyaluronidase. The
-D-glucuronidase and pyrrolydonylaminopeptidase
enzyme activities were investigated with diagnostic tablets (Rosco,
Hiss Diagnostics, Freiburg, Germany) as substrates, and the enzyme
hyaluronidase activity was determined with a plate decapsulation test
with cultivation of the isolates in close proximity to a growing mucoid
Streptococcus equi subsp. zooepidemicus strain.
The 51 isolates were additionally investigated by RFLP analysis of the
16S rRNA gene, using the restriction enzymes RsaI and
AvaII (18). For control purposes, streptococci
of the species S. pyogenes (n = 4), S. agalactiae (n = 12), S. equi subsp.
equi (n = 2), S. equi subsp.
zooepidemicus (n = 3), S. dysgalactiae serogroups C (n = 4), G (n = 4), and L (n = 4), S. canis
(n = 12), and S. porcinus (n = 4) were included.
Based on the sequence analysis of the V2 region of the 16S rRNA gene
reported by Bentley and Leigh (6) and the sequence data of
the variable region of the 23S rRNA gene given by Harland et al.
(12), species-specific primers were designed using the primer design program OLIGO 4.0.
The primer design of the species-specific part of the 16S-23S rRNA
intergenic spacer region was performed after sequencing of the genes of
S. uberis and S. parauberis reference strains. For the intergenic spacer region of S. uberis, the primer
sequences recommended by Forsman et al. (10) were used.
For sequencing, the intergenic spacer regions of the S. parauberis reference strain NCDO 2020 and the S. uberis
reference strain NCDO 2038 were amplified with the oligonucleotide
primers c (5'-3', TTGTACACACCGCCCGTCA) and b (5'-3',
GGTACCTTAGTTTCAGTTC) described by Chanter et al.
(7). The primers were derived from conserved regions
within the 16S rRNA (primer c) and the 23S rRNA (primer b) genes. The
oligonucleotide primers were synthesized by ARK-Biosystem (Darmstadt,
Germany). The sequencing was performed with the MegaBACE 1000 DNA
sequencing system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Europe, Freiburg,
Germany) according to the protocols described by the manufacturer. The
sequence data were further studied and analyzed with the computer
program MegAlign 1993-97 (DNASTAR Inc., Constance, Germany).
The target genes, the oligonucleotide primers used, and the sizes of
the amplicons are summarized in Table 1.
For PCR, the reaction mixture (30 µl) contained 1 µl (16S rRNA
gene, 16S-23S rRNA spacer region) or 0.8 µl (23S rRNA gene) of primer
1 (10 pmol/liter), 1 µl or 0.8 µl of primer 2 (10 pmol/liter), 0.6 µl of deoxynucleotide triphosphate (10 mmol; MBI Fermentas, St.
Leon-Rot, Germany), 3 µl of 10× thermophilic buffer (Promega,
Boehringer, Ingelheim, Germany), 1.8 µl (16S rRNA gene, 16S-23S rRNA
spacer region) or 1.5 µl (23S rRNA gene) of MgCl2 (25 mmol; Promega), 0.1 µl of Taq DNA polymerase (5 U/µl;
Promega), and 20.0 µl or 20.7 µl of distilled water. Finally, 2.5 µl of DNA preparation was added to each reaction tube. For DNA
preparations, 5 to 10 colonies of the bacteria were first suspended in
100 µl of TE buffer (10 mmol/liter Tris-HCl, 1 mmol/liter EDTA [pH
8.0]) containing 5 µl of mutanolysin (50 U; Sigma, Deisenhofen,
Germany) for 60 min at 37°C, and then the bacteria were suspended in
10 µl of proteinase K (14.8 mg/ml; Boehringer) for 120 min at 56°C.
After boiling for 10 min at 100°C, the suspension was centrifuged
(10,000 × g, 5 s) and subsequently cooled before
use. The tubes were then placed in a thermal cycler (Techne-Progene;
Thermodux, Wertheim, Germany) with the programs summarized in Table 1.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1.
Oligonucleotide primers and PCR programs for
amplification of species-specific parts of the genes encoding the
16S rRNA, 23S rRNA and 16S-23S rRNA intergenic spacer region of
S. uberis and S. parauberis
|
|
The presence of PCR products was determined by electrophoresis of 12 µl of the reaction product in a 2% agarose gel with Tris acetate-electrophoresis buffer (TAE; 40 mmol of Tris-HCl per liter, 1.14 mol of glacial acetic acid per liter, 1 mmol of EDTA per liter
[pH 8.0]) with a 100-bp DNA ladder (Gibco BRL, Eggenstein, Germany)
as molecular size markers.
The oligonucleotide primers designed from the species-specific part of
the 16S rRNA and 23S rRNA genes allowed a molecular identification of
67 isolates as S. uberis and 4 isolates as S. parauberis. The latter also included the S. parauberis
strain 94/16, which was originally isolated from a diseased turbot
(9). Both PCR systems produced identical results (Fig.
1). The identity of the S. uberis and S. parauberis isolates could additionally be
confirmed by RFLP analysis (data not shown) and by the use of primer
pairs amplifying a species-specific region of the 16S-23S rRNA
intergenic spacer region. The consensus sequences of the intergenic
spacer regions of both species are given in Fig.
2. All control strains of various species
and serogroups were negative throughout. As reported earlier (13,
18), the occurrence of S. parauberis as a
mastitis-causing pathogen appears to be rare. This species seems to be
more frequent among British dairy herds (11). Isolation of
S. parauberis from diseased fish was described by
Doménech et al. (9). According to the results of the
present study, the species-specific regions of the described target
genes of S. uberis and S. parauberis did not show
any sequence variations. Corresponding to these results, no
intraspecies variations were reported in the 16S rRNA genes of S. agalactiae (1, 17) and S. porcinus
(3). However, a variation in the sequence of the 16S rRNA
gene was observed for S. suis (8) and for
S. equi subsp. zooepidemicus (2).

View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Typical amplicons of S. uberis (lanes 1 and 2)
with a size of 445 bp and with S. parauberis (lane 3) as
negative control, using the S. uberis 16S rRNA-specific
primers ub-I and ub-II, and amplicons of S. parauberis
(lanes 4 and 5) with a size of 884 bp and S. uberis (lane 6)
as negative control, using the S. parauberis 16S
rRNA-specific primers paraub-I and paraub-II. M, 100-bp ladder as size
marker.
|
|

View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Alignment of the consensus gene sequences of the 16S-23S
rRNA intergenic spacer region of S. parauberis NCDO 2020 (417 bp) (accession no. AF255656) and S. uberis NCDO 2038 (338 bp) (accession no. AF255657). The selected S. parauberis-specific oligonucleotide primers are underlined; the
marked areas indicate the differences in nucleotide sequences. The
region arrangement was performed according to Chanter et. al.
(7); stuffer regions inserted to achieve alignment are
indicated by -----. Sequence 1, S. parauberis NCDO 2020; sequence 2, S. uberis
NCDO 2038. A (top), end of 16S rRNA gene; B (bottom right), start of
23S rRNA gene.
|
|
The PCR amplification of species-specific sequences of S. uberis and S. parauberis in the present study offers a
rapid and sensitive method by which to identify both biochemically and
serologically almost indistinguishable species. This might help in
determining the prevalence of both species in dairy herds.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institut
für Tierärztliche Nahrungsmittelkunde, Bakteriologie und
Hygiene der Milch, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, Frankfurter
Str. 107, 35392 Gießen, Germany. Phone: 49641-9938383. Fax:
49641-9938389. E-mail: Christoph.Laemmler{at}vetmed.uni-giessen.de.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Abdulmawjood, A., and C. Lämmler.
1999.
Amplification of 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequences for the identification of streptococci of Lancefield group B.
Res. Vet. Sci.
67:159-162[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Abdulmawjood, A., and C. Lämmler.
2000.
Determination of intraspecies variations of the V2 region of the 16S rRNA gene of Streptococcus equi subsp. zooepidemicus.
Res. Vet. Sci.
68:33-39[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Abdulmawjood, A.,
R. Weiß, and C. Lämmler.
1998.
Species identification of Streptococcus porcinus by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of 16S ribosomal DNA.
Res. Vet. Sci.
65:85-86[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Bentley, R. W.,
J. A. Leigh, and M. D. Collins.
1991.
Intrageneric structure of Streptococcus based on comparative analysis of small-subunit rRNA sequences.
Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.
41:487-494[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Bentley, R. W.,
J. A. Leigh, and M. D. Collins.
1993.
Development and use of species-specific oligonucleotide probes for differentiation of Streptococcus uberis and Streptococcus parauberis.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
31:57-60[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Bentley, R. W., and J. A. Leigh.
1995.
Development of the PCR-based hybridization protocol for identification of streptococcal species.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
33:1296-1301[Abstract].
|
| 7.
|
Chanter, N.,
N. Collin,
N. Holmes,
M. Binns, and J. Mumford.
1997.
Characterization of the Lancefield group C Streptococcus 16S-23S rRNA gene intergenic spacer and its potential for identification and sub-specific typing.
Epidemiol. Infect.
118:125-135[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Chatellier, S.,
J. Harel,
Y. Zhang,
M. Gottschalk,
R. Higgins,
L. A. Devriese, and R. Brousseau.
1998.
Phylogenetic diversity of Streptococcus suis strains of various serotypes as revealed by 16S rRNA gene sequence comparison.
Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.
48:581-589[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Doménech, A.,
J. F. Fernández-Garayzábal,
C. Pascual,
J. A. Garcia,
M. T. Cutuli,
M. A. Moreno,
M. D. Collins, and L. Dominguez.
1996.
Streptococcosis in cultured turbot, Scophthalmus maximus (L.), associated with Streptococcus parauberis.
J. Fish Dis.
19:33-38[CrossRef].
|
| 10.
|
Forsman, P.,
A. Tilsala-Timisjärvi, and T. Alatossava.
1997.
Identification of streptococcal causes of bovine mastitis using 16S-23S rRNA spacer regions.
Microbiology
143:3491-3500[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Garvie, E. I., and A. Bramley.
1979.
Streptococcus uberis: an approach to its classification.
J. Appl. Bacteriol.
46:295-304.
|
| 12.
|
Harland, N. M.,
J. A. Leigh, and M. D. Collins.
1993.
Development of gene probes for the specific identification of Streptococcus uberis and Streptococcus parauberis based upon large subunit rRNA gene sequences.
J. Appl. Bacteriol.
74:526-531[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Jayarao, B. M.,
J. J. F. Doré, Jr.,
G. A. Baumbach,
K. R. Matthews, and S. P. Oliver.
1991.
Differentiation of Streptococcus uberis from Streptococcus parauberis by polymerase chain reaction and restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of the 16S ribosomal DNA.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
29:2774-2778[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Jayarao, B. M.,
J. J. E. Doré, Jr., and S. P. Oliver.
1992.
Restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of 16S ribosomal DNA of Streptococcus and Enterococcus species of bovine origin.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
30:2235-2240[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Lämmler, C.
1991.
Biochemical and serological properties of Streptococcus uberis.
J. Vet. Med.
38:737-742.
|
| 16.
|
Lämmler, C., and G. Hahn.
1994.
Streptokokken.
In
H. Blobel, and T. Schließer (ed.), Handbuch der bakteriellen Infektionen bei Tieren. Band II/2: Streptokokken-Infektionen und Rotlauf. 2. Auflage. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena, Germany.
|
| 17.
|
Lämmler, C.,
A. Abdulmawjood, and R. Weiß.
1998.
Properties of serological group B streptococci of dog, cat and monkey origin.
J. Vet. Med.
B45:561-566.
|
| 18.
|
Lämmler, C.,
A. Abdulmawjood,
G. Danic,
S. Vaillant, and R. Weiß.
1998.
Differentiation of Streptococcus uberis and Streptococcus parauberis by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of the 16S ribosomal RNA gene and further studies on serological properties.
Med. Sci. Res.
26:177-179.
|
| 19.
|
Williams, A. M., and M. D. Collins.
1990.
Molecular taxonomic studies on Streptococcus uberis types I and II. Description of Streptococcus parauberis sp. nov.
J. Appl. Bacteriol.
68:485-490[Medline].
|
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2001, p. 1618-1621, Vol. 39, No. 4
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.4.1618-1621.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Pitkala, A., Koort, J., Bjorkroth, J.
(2008). Identification and Antimicrobial Resistance of Streptococcus uberis and Streptococcus parauberis Isolated from Bovine Milk Samples. J DAIRY SCI
91: 4075-4081
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Tomita, T., Meehan, B., Wongkattiya, N., Malmo, J., Pullinger, G., Leigh, J., Deighton, M.
(2008). Identification of Streptococcus uberis Multilocus Sequence Types Highly Associated with Mastitis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
74: 114-124
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Schmitt-Van de Leemput, E., Zadoks, R. N.
(2007). Genotypic and Phenotypic Detection of Macrolide and Lincosamide Resistance in Streptococcus uberis. J DAIRY SCI
90: 5089-5096
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Odierno, L., Calvinho, L., Traverssa, P., Lasagno, M., Bogni, C., Reinoso, E.
(2006). Conventional Identification of Streptococcus uberis Isolated from Bovine Mastitis in Argentinean Dairy Herds.. J DAIRY SCI
89: 3886-3890
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Coffey, T. J., Pullinger, G. D., Urwin, R., Jolley, K. A., Wilson, S. M., Maiden, M. C., Leigh, J. A.
(2006). First Insights into the Evolution of Streptococcus uberis: a Multilocus Sequence Typing Scheme That Enables Investigation of Its Population Biology. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
72: 1420-1428
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Zadoks, R. N., Schukken, Y. H., Wiedmann, M.
(2005). Multilocus Sequence Typing of Streptococcus uberis Provides Sensitive and Epidemiologically Relevant Subtype Information and Reveals Positive Selection in the Virulence Gene pauA. J. Clin. Microbiol.
43: 2407-2417
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hassan, A. A., Akineden, O., Usleber, E.
(2005). Identification of Streptococcus canis Isolated from Milk of Dairy Cows with Subclinical Mastitis. J. Clin. Microbiol.
43: 1234-1238
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Field, T. R., Ward, P. N., Pedersen, L. H., Leigh, J. A.
(2003). The Hyaluronic Acid Capsule of Streptococcus uberis Is Not Required for the Development of Infection and Clinical Mastitis. Infect. Immun.
71: 132-139
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ventura, M., Zink, R.
(2002). Rapid Identification, Differentiation, and Proposed New Taxonomic Classification of Bifidobacterium lactis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
68: 6429-6434
[Abstract]
[Full Text]