Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, May 2001, p. 1771-1773, Vol. 39, No. 5
Département de Virologie, Laboratoire
Alphabio,1 and Département
d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie, Hôpital Saint
Joseph,3 Marseille, Département de
Virologie et d'Hépatologie, CHU
Bordeaux,2 Département
d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie, CH
Hyéres,4 and Institut Arnault
Tzanck, Saint Laurent du Var,5 France
Received 26 July 2000/Returned for modification 26 September
2000/Accepted 5 March 2001
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotyping of samples from 184 patients
with chronic HCV infection by the Trugene 5'NC genotyping kit, based on
sequence analysis of the 5' noncoding region (5' NCR), and the InnoLiPA
assay was evaluated. In addition to these methods, the 184 samples were
also analyzed by sequencing of part of the NS5B of the HCV genome after
in-house PCR amplification, as a means of validating results obtained
with the 5' NCR. The distribution of the genotypes typed by NS5B
sequence analysis was as follows: 1a, 41 samples; 1b, 58 samples; 1d, 1 sample; 2a, 5 samples; 2b, 2 samples; 2c, 7 samples; 3a, 46 samples;
4a, 7 samples; 4c, 1 samples; 4e, 9 samples; 5a, 6 samples; 6a, 1 sample. The Trugene and InnoLiPA assays gave concordant results within
HCV types in 100% of cases. The ability to discriminate at the subtype
level was 76 and 74% for the Trugene and the InnoLiPA assays, respectively.
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is
considered the major cause of posttransfusion non-A, non-B hepatitis.
The viral genome, a positive-sense single-stranded RNA of about 9,400 nucleotides (5), is characterized by a high genetic
heterogeneity like other RNA viruses. HCV isolates show four levels of
genetic variability: types, subtypes, isolates, and quasispecies
(3). An HCV genotype is therefore used with the
histological results from liver biopsy and viral load for counseling
individual patients about the risk-benefit ratio of therapy (17,
21, 22). HCV genotypes are distributed differently depending on
geography and the etiology of infection (15, 25). For the
purpose of nomenclature, it has been proposed that HCV be classified
into types, corresponding to the main branches in the phylogenetic
tree, and subtypes, corresponding to the more related sequences within
the major groups (23, 24). HCV genotypes can be
established by methods based on PCR typing and/or serological typing
(2, 4, 16). The high degree of conservation in the 5'
noncoding regions (5' NCR) has made it the target of choice for reverse
transcriptase PCR-based detection assays. Moreover, several PCR typing
methods, such as reverse dot blot (26), restriction fragment length polymorphism (10), cleavase fragment
length polymorphism, dideoxy fingerprinting, heteroduplex mobility
analysis (28), and hybridization to genotype-specific
probes (18), exploit sequence-based differences and/or
differences in secondary structure of the 5' NCR for HCV genotyping
(9). Nucleotide sequence analysis is the reference method
for identifying different genotypes of HCV (9, 13).
However, because this method is expensive and time-consuming and
requires special equipment for sequencing, it has been restricted to
the research setting and considered impractical for large clinical
studies. A standardized sequencing assay has recently been developed
for routine determination of HCV genotypes. In order to determine
whether direct sequencing could be a routine tool for the determination
of hepatitis C virus genotype, we assessed this first commercial type
of HCV genotyping method (Trugene 5'NC HCV genotyping kit; Visible
Genetics, Toronto, Canada), based on sequence analysis of the 5' NCR,
with samples from 184 patients with chronic HCV infection, and we
compared the data with data from the most widely used genotyping method based on the reverse dot blot method, the InnoLiPA assay. In addition to these methods, the 184 patient samples were also subjected to
amplification and sequence analysis of a region within the NS5B gene as
a means of validating results obtained with the 5' NCR.
(Part of this work was presented in abstract form at the AASLD
symposium in Dallas in 1999.)
The serum specimens analyzed in this study were obtained from
184 consecutive patients with histologically proven chronic HCV
infection, monitored in two hepatology units in Marseilles and
Bordeaux, France. All the patients were HCV RNA positive as determined
by PCR with a commercial detection kit (Amplicor HCV; Roche Molecular
Systems, Neuilly, France) (29). HCV RNA was quantified in
sera with the nonisotopic branched-DNA signal amplification method
(version 2.0; Bayer Corporation, Emeryville, Calif.). Patient viral
load ranged from 0.5 × 106 to 50 × 106 eq/ml. In an effort to minimize sample
degradation from multiple freeze-thaw cycles, all samples were thawed
on receipt, aliquoted, and stored at HCV genotypes were determined by two HCV typing methods using the 5'
NCR of the genome: the Trugene 5'NC HCV genotyping kit method and the
InnoLiPA test. Both tests were carried out after RNA extraction,
reverse transcription, and amplification using the Amplicor HCV RNA
assay (Roche Diagnostic Systems, Neuilly, France) according to the
manufacturer's instructions. The amplified product was analyzed using
a reverse dot blot assay (InnoLiPA) according to the manufacturer's
instructions (26) and by the Trugene 5'NC genotyping kit.
The minimum viral load needed for all typing tests to work ranges from
100 to 1,000 copies/ml.
Trugene 5'NC assay.
Bidirectional DNA sequencing of the
amplification products was performed using CLIP, a sensitive
sequencing method developed by Visible Genetics Inc. Each sequencing
reaction was loaded on a long read tower (Visible Genetics Inc.), an
automated DNA sequencer. The resulting sequence for each sample was
then compared to a database containing known HCV isolates using the
Clustal W method (8). A phylogenetic analysis of a 196-bp
segment (nucleotides
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.5.1771-1773.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Hepatitis C Virus Genotyping Based on 5'
Noncoding Sequence Analysis (Trugene)
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
70°C prior to testing
(11).
256 to
70) of the 5' NCR was performed on all
of the sequences generated in this study (19). Prototype
sequences obtained from GenBank were included in this analysis.
80°C
until use. cDNA synthesis was carried out using random hexamer
oligonucleotides. Then cDNA was amplified in a single reaction with
primers thought to be highly conserved among different isolates of HCV
(12). A second PCR was carried out using multiple primer
sets, published by Simmonds et al. (23). The resulting PCR
product of 222 bp was subsequently purified by phenol-chloroform
extraction and precipitated by ethanol. The purified product of 222 bp
was subsequently purified and bidirectionally sequenced by the
dideoxynucleotide method with the automated Clipper sequencer
(Visible Genetics). Amplification of negative samples with PCR in the
NS5B region produced no sequence. To avoid contamination, all analyses
were performed following Kwok and Higuchi's recommendations (14).
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The NS5B sequence analysis was used as a reference test for the accuracy of the genotyping. The distribution of the genotypes typed by NS5B sequence analysis was as follows: 1a, 41 samples; 1b, 58 samples; 1d, 1 sample; 2a, 5 samples; 2b, 2 samples; 2c, 7 samples; 3a, 46 samples; 4a, 7 samples; 4c, 1 sample; 4e, 9 samples; 5a, 6 samples; and 6a, 1 sample. All the samples were successfully typed by the HCV Trugene 5'NC genotyping kit and with the InnoLiPA assay.
Accuracy was defined as the number of correct genotype samples from the Trugene 5'NC genotyping kit and InnoLiPA assays divided by the total number of genotypes determined by the NS5B sequence analysis. The overall accuracies of the two tests regardless of the genotype were 76% for the Trugene 5'NC HCV and 74% for the InnoLiPA assays.
Among the samples classified as genotype 1a by NS5B sequence analysis, 31 of 41 (76%) were in agreement with the two 5' NCR typing assays, and 10 of 41 (24%) were discordant or incompletely identified by these two assays.
Among the samples classified as genotype 1b by NS5B sequence analysis, 55 of 58 (95%) were in agreement with the Trugene 5'NC genotyping kit, versus 53 of 58 (91%) with the InnoLiPA assay; 3 of 58 (5%) and 5 of 58 (9%) were discordant or incompletely identified by, respectively, the Trugene 5'NC genotyping kit and the InnoLiPA assays. The only sample typed 1d by NS5B sequence analysis was typed 1a by the two 5' NCR typing assays.
Among the samples classified as genotype 2a, 2b, or 2c by NS5B sequence analysis, 1 of 5 (20%), 1 of 2 (50%), and 1 of 7 (15%), respectively, were in agreement with the Trugene 5'NC genotyping kit, while 4 of 5 (80%), 1 of 2 (50%), and 6 of 7 (85%) were discordant or incompletely identified by the Trugene 5'NC genotyping kit. One sample identified as type 2b by NS5B sequence analysis was correctly identified using the InnoLiPA assay, while 13 of 14 (91%) were discordant or incompletely identified.
Among the 46 samples classified as genotype 3a by NS5B sequence analysis, 44 (96%) were in agreement with the Trugene 5'NC genotyping kit and the InnoLiPA assay, while 2 (4%) were discordant or incompletely identified by Trugene 5'NC genotyping kit and the InnoLiPA assays.
For the 17 samples classified as genotype 4a (seven samples), 4c (one sample), and 4e (nine samples) by NS5B sequence analysis, neither of the two assays was able to correctly identify the subtype.
For the six samples classified as genotype 5a and the only sample classified 6a by NS5B sequence analysis, both tests were able to identify the correct subtype.
Lower accuracy was observed with the two assays due to the highly conserved nature of the 5' NCR, particularly for subtypes 2 and 4. The InnoLiPA test was less discriminate than the Trugene assay in discriminating subtype 2 isolates. However, this difference was not statistically significant.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The Trugene assay is the first generation of direct sequencing tests which provide complete sequence information to characterize HCV genotypes. However, because these methods are expensive and time-consuming and require special equipment for sequencing, they have been restricted to the research setting and considered impractical for clinical diagnosis. The time required for the Trugene assay is comparable (less than 5 h, including only 30 min of sequence analysis) to that for the InnoLiPA assay, which is one of the more commonly used genotyping assays worldwide. The sequencer is more compact than other currently available sequencers, and the cost of the genotyping assay (including the sequencer) is generally comparable. The Trugene assay may be used in a routine clinical laboratory, like the InnoLiPA assay, after amplification with the Amplicor assay to genotype all the HCV isolates. The Trugene assay does not require an additional specimen-processing step and utilizes products obtained from a single, nonnested amplification reaction, thus eliminating delays and the risks of carryover contamination but without incorporation of dUTPs and uracyl-N glycosidase. Other methods, such as restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis, are able to characterize genotypes in 93% of the cases (10).
As determined by NS5B sequence analysis, which is the reference method for discriminating nucleotide sequence variation, the accuracies of the Trugene and InnoLiPA assays were, respectively, 74 and 76%. Our data on sequence analysis of the 5' NCR were confirmed by Germer et al. (9). In their study, 89.4% of the specimens were successfully classified after computer-assisted analysis of the sequence data.
The limitations of the Trugene 5'NC assay are related to the low
discriminating power of 5' NCR for determination of particular types or
subtypes (27). The high level of conservation found in
this region cannot discriminate subtypes, as in the case with subtypes 2a and 2c. The performance of the direct sequencing method is
similar to that of the InnoLiPA Test, with relative failure to subtype
the type 2 genotype (27). There are also examples in which
only one or two minor nucleotide changes distinguish unique subtypes
from each other. Two examples of this situation are illustrated by the
minor differences seen in the 5' NCR sequences of subtypes 1a and 1b: a
single base change at position
99 (adenine to guanine) is the
only change, and the thymine-to-cytosine polymorphism at position
94
describes genotypes 1a and 1b.
A crucial assumption of all genotyping assays is that the region analyzed (5' NCR, core, E1, NS4, and NS5B) is representative of the genome as a whole. This assumption would break down if recombination between HCV genotypes occurred during replication, producing hybrid viruses containing contributions from different genotypes in different parts of the genome (3). This phenomenon, well established for human immunodeficiency virus, has yet to be demonstrated for HCV.
The direct sequencing of amplification products provides more detailed sequence information than genotyping assays based on hybridization, heteroduplex mobility analysis, single-strand conformation polymorphism, or restriction analysis. This additional information could prove to be quite useful in the detection of new viral types or to demonstrate nosocomial, sporadic, or interfamilial transmission by comparing the sequences (1, 6, 7, 20).
In conclusion, considering the importance of genotyping in hepatitis C treatment management, the Trugene HCV assay may be considered reliable for differentiating between all HCV types and could be used as a routine tool for the determination of HCV genotypes. This test provided a sensitive and efficient means of HCV genotyping in a clinical setting, particularly in light of studies which show that the clinically relevant distinction is only between genotypes.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Anne Beyou and Celine Mazure (Visible Genetics Europe, Evry, France) for their assistance.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Laboratoire Alphabio, 23 Rue de Friedland, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, 13006 Marseille, France. Phone: (33) 4 91 25 41 00. Fax: (33) 4 91 79 20 44. E-mail: philippe.halfon{at}alphabio.fr.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Allander, T., A. Gruber, M. Naghavi, A. Beyene, T. Soderstrom, M. Bjorkholm, L. Grillner, and M. A. Persson. 1995. Frequent patient-to-patient transmission of hepatitis C. virus in a haematology ward. Lancet 345:603-607[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 2. |
Bhattacherjee, V.,
L. E. Prescott,
I. Pike,
B. Rodgers,
H. Bell,
A. R. El-Zayadi,
M. C. Kew,
J. Conradie,
C. K. Lin, and H. Marsden.
1995.
Use of NS-4 peptides to identify type-specific antibody to hepatitis C virus genotypes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6.
J. Gen. Virol.
76:1737-1748 |
| 3. | Bukh, J., R. H. Miller, and R. H. Purcell. 1995. Genetic heterogeneity of hepatitis C virus quasispecies and genotypes. Semin. Liver Dis. 15:41-63[Medline]. |
| 4. | Cerino, A., A. Cividini, M. Asti, A. Lanza, E. Sillini, and M. U. Mondelli. 1996. Comparative evaluation of two serologic typing methods for hepatitis C virus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:714-716[Abstract]. |
| 5. |
Choo, Q. L.,
K. H. Richman,
J. H. Han,
K. Berger,
C. Lee,
C. Dong,
C. Gallegos,
D. Coit,
R. Medina-Selby, and P. J. Barr.
1991.
Genetic organization and diversity of the hepatitis C virus.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
88:2451-2455 |
| 6. | Diago, M., R. Zapater, C. Tuset, P. Carbonell, C. Gonzalez, R. Cors, and E. Casas. 1996. Intrafamily transmission of hepatitis C virus: sexual and nonsexual contacts. J. Hepatol. 25:125-128[CrossRef][Medline]. . |
| 7. |
Esteban, J. I.,
J. Gomez,
M. Martell,
B. Cabot,
J. Quer,
J. Camps,
A. Gonzalez,
T. Otero,
A. Moya, and R. Esteban.
1996.
Transmission of hepatitis C virus by a cardiac surgeon.
N. Engl. J. Med.
334:555-560 |
| 8. | Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using bootstrap. Evolution 39:783-791[CrossRef]. |
| 9. |
Germer, J. J.,
P. N. Rys,
J. N. Thorvilson, and D. H. Persing.
1999.
Determination of hepatitis C virus genotype by direct sequence analysis of products generated with the Amplicor HCV test.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
37:2625-2630 |
| 10. | Gish, R. G., K. Qian, L. Brooks, J. Leung, I. Pike, and J. Y. Lau. 1999. Characterization of anti-hepatitis C virus-positive sera not genotyped by restriction fragment length polymorphism or serology. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 14:339-344[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 11. | Halfon, P., H. Khiri, V. Gerolami, M. Bourliere, J. M. Feryn, P. Reynier, A. Gauthier, and G. Cartouzou. 1996. Impact of various handling and storage conditions on quantitative detection of hepatitis C virus RNA. J. Hepatol. 25:307-311[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 12. | Halfon, P., Y. Quentin, B. Roquelaure, J. Sarles, G. Halimi, V. Gerolami, H. Khiri, M. Bourlière, and G. Cartouzou. 1999. Mother-to-infant transmission of hepatitis C virus: molecular evidence of superinfection by homologous virus in children. J. Hepatol. 30:970-978[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 13. | Holland, J., I. Bastian, R. M. Ratcliff, M. Y. Beers, H. Hahesy, D. R. Shaw, and G. D. Higgins. 1998. Hepatitis C genotyping by direct sequencing of the product from the Roche Amplicor test: methodology and application to a south Australian population. Pathology 30:192-195[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 14. | Kwok, S., and R. Higuchi. 1989. Avoiding false positives with PCR. Nature 339:237-238[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 15. |
Lau, J. Y.,
G. L. Davis,
L. E. Prescott,
G. Maertens,
K. L. Lindsay,
K. Qian,
M. Mizokami, and P. Simmonds.
1996.
Distribution of hepatitis C virus genotypes determined by line probe assay in patients with chronic hepatitis C seen at tertiary referral centers in the United States.
Ann. Intern. Med.
124:868-876 |
| 16. | Lee, J. H., W. K. Roth, and S. Zeuzem. 1997. Evaluation and comparison of different hepatitis C virus genotyping and serotyping assays. J. Hepatol. 26:1001-1009[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 17. |
McHutchison, J. G.,
S. C. Gordon,
E. R. Schiff,
M. L. Shiffman,
W. M. Lee,
V. K. Rustgi,
Z. D. Goodman,
M. H. Ling,
S. Cort, and J. K. Albrecht.
1998.
Interferon alfa-2b alone or in combination with ribavirin as initial treatment for chronic hepatitis C. Hepatitis Interventional Therapy Group.
N. Engl. J. Med.
339:1485-1492 |
| 18. |
Okamoto, H.,
Y. Sugiyama,
S. Okada,
K. Kurai,
Y. Akahane,
Y. Sugai,
T. Tanaka,
K. Sato,
F. Tsuda, and Y. Miyakawa.
1992.
Typing hepatitis C virus by polymerase chain reaction with type-specific primers: application to clinical surveys and tracing infectious sources.
J. Gen. Virol.
73:673-679 |
| 19. |
Olsen, G. J.,
H. Matsuda,
R. Hagstrom, and R. Overbeek.
1994.
Fast DNAml, a tool for construction of phylogenetic trees of DNA sequences using maximum likelihood.
Comput. Appl. Biol. Sci.
10:41-48 |
| 20. | Power, J. P., E. Lawlor, F. Davidson, E. C. Holmes, P. L. Yap, and P. Simmonds. 1995. Molecular epidemiology of an outbreak of infection with hepatitis C virus in recipients of anti-D immunoglobulin. Lancet 345:1211-1213[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 21. | Poynard, T., P. Marcellin, S. S. Lee, C. Niederau, G. S. Minuk, G. Ideo, V. Bain, J. Heathcote, S. Zeuzem, C. Trepo, and J. Albrecht. 1998. Randomised trial of interferon alpha2b plus ribavirin for 48 weeks or for 24 weeks versus interferon alpha2b plus placebo for 48 weeks for treatment of chronic infection with hepatitis C virus. International Hepatitis Interventional Therapy Group (IHIT). Lancet 35:1426-1432. |
| 22. | Poynard, T., J. McHutchison, Z. Goodman, M. H. Ling, and J. Albrecht. 2000. Is an "a la carte" combination interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin regimen possible for the first line treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis C? Hepatology 31:211-218[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 23. | Simmonds, P., A. Alberti, H. J. Alter, F. Bonino, D. W. Braddley, C. Bréchot, J. T. Brouwer, S. W. Chan, K. Chayama, and D. S. Chen. 1994. A. proposed system for the nomenclature of hepatitis C viral genomes. Hepatology 19:1321-1324[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 24. | Smith, D. B., and P. Simmonds. 1997. Molecular epidemiology of hepatitis C virus. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 12:522-527[Medline]. |
| 25. |
Stuyver, L.,
W. Van Arnhem,
A. Wyseur,
F. Hernandez,
E. Delaporte, and G. Maertens.
1994.
Classification of hepatitis C viruses based on phylogenetic analysis of the envelope 1 and nonstructural 5B regions and identification of five additional subtypes.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:10134-10138 |
| 26. | Stuyver, L., A. Wyseur, W. Van Arnhem, F. Hernandez, and G. Maertens. 1996. Second-generation line probe assay for hepatitis C virus genotyping. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:2259-2266[Abstract]. |
| 27. | Stuyver, L., A. Wyseur, W. Van Arnhem, F. Lunel, P. Laurent-Puig, J. M. Pawlotsky, B. Kleter, L. Bassit, J. Nkengasong, and L. J. Van Doorn. 1995. Hepatitis C virus genotyping. by means of 5'-UR/core line probe assay and molecular analysis of untypeable samples. Virus Res. 38:137-157[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 28. |
White, P. A.,
X. Zhai,
I. Carter,
Y. Zhao, and W. D. Rawlinson.
2000.
Simplified hepatitis C virus genotyping by heteroduplex mobility analysis.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
38:477-482 |
| 29. |
Young, K.,
R. M. Resnick, and T. W. Myers.
1993.
Detection of hepatitis C virus RNA by a combined reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction assay.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
31:882-886 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. |
|---|---|
| Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |
|---|